Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

'This isn’t about blasphemy — it’s about public order.' Lawyer Mohammed Akunjee defends the conviction of Hamit Coskun for burning a Koran, saying it wasn’t religiously motivated but based on causing public alarm and distress — not ‘blasphemy laws through the backdoor’.

99,719 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Skipster's profile picture
Skipster1 year ago

Why would the public be alarmed and distressed about a book being burned. It's a fucking book.

James's profile picture
James1 year ago

@GBNEWS And a vile hate filled one at that.

Baroness Foster DBE #FreeTheHostages🇮🇱❤️'s profile picture
Baroness Foster DBE #FreeTheHostages🇮🇱❤️1 year ago

Whatever happened to … Monty Python 🤷‍♀️ Half the population was ‘offended’ … So we just laughed it off 😂 This drama is just so … boring & exhausting 🙄 … And is a ‘in’ to reintroducing blasphemy law and needs to stop … Judges need to get a grip !!!

Roger Wade ✡️ 🎗's profile picture
Roger Wade ✡️ 🎗1 year ago

@GBNEWS Self deprivation and mockery is part of English humour. This is another sign of how our culture is being forced to change to suit people who aren't willing to adapt despite moving to the UK.

Daughters of Persia's profile picture
Daughters of Persia1 year ago

🚨 Unimaginable news from Iran: 10 Baha'i women have been sentenced to a combined 90 YEARS in PRISON for activities as innocent as teaching music, art, and language to kids. Their "crime"? Simply belonging to a faith the regime doesn't recognize. Women in Iran deserve freedom, not fear. Share their story. Let the world know. 💔 #womanlifefreedom #iranianwomen

Brunhylde Lingus 💚🤍💜🇬🇧🇮🇱🎗️'s profile picture
Brunhylde Lingus 💚🤍💜🇬🇧🇮🇱🎗️1 year ago

Mohammed Tasnime Akunjee was photographed in the crowd of Islamists outside Batley Grammar School in 2021. He was also ISIS terrorist Shamima Begum's lawyer.

SandyxB's profile picture
SandyxB1 year ago

@GBNEWS Was he? How many of that violent mob in Batley, threatening the life of the teacher, over a cartoon were arrested? Imagine the distress and fear he and his family have endured for years because of the stoneage, violent mob.

TheOldMan's profile picture
TheOldMan1 year ago

So on that basis if I see someone ugly and am distressed I should take them to court? Utter nonsense In the UK there is a long tradition of freedom of speech @JohnCleese @montypython & Life of Brian ……👊🤣

NollyPreep's profile picture
NollyPreep1 year ago

@BearGund @GBNEWS @JohnCleese @montypython Nobody in the UK has a right to be protected from feeling offended. I wonder how many Jewish people have been offended by endless chants of "From the river to the sea"?

Alan Fraser's profile picture
Alan Fraser1 year ago

Your guest himself failing to realise this very ruling is in itself undermining him. Many now believing that he is simply a beneficiary of such a perceived unfairness for no other reason than who he is. The reality is 90% of those on Terrorist watch lists in the UK are Muslim fundamentalists. That is in itself, given the demographic is only 7% Muslim, a terrifying figure. That 90% pose an unimaginable and unprecedented risk to the rest of society. Fundamentalism is by absolute definition the strict adherence to literal interpretation of scripture, a scripture within the book a man burnt. Is it not arguable that this man was attacking a book that by its content has inspired some of the worst events on the shores of UK and wider Europe. This legal ruling today is blasphemy legislation at work and no amount of angry defence of that judge or the system under which he functions will change that reality. A now flawed but much trusted justice system doing immeasurable damage to itself and the nation from which it may not recover. A system that we have so long relied upon to offer fairness and balance now doing neither. The result of that collapse is beyond worrying.

The H Files's profile picture
The H Files1 year ago

@GBNEWS 🎯

Related Videos

“The Government is struggling to bring in a Muslim blasphemy law through the backdoor, so instead it’s going to try and do it via the front.” The Crown Prosecution Service is seeking to overturn a High Court judge’s judgment acquitting Hamit Coskun last month. Hamit was originally convicted of a religiously aggravated public order offence for burning a copy of the Quran in protest outside the Turkish consulate in London. The judgment in the appeal hearing was a welcome reaffirmation of ancient English liberties. Mr Justice Bennathan said: “The right to freedom of expression, if it is a right worth having, must include the right to express views that offend, shock or disturb.” Now the CPS says it isn’t happy with the judgment. This is hugely significant because the outcome will set legal precedent and will almost certainly be cited in all future cases involving not just Quran burning, but public challenges to Islam in general. The CPS is arguing that what Hamit did was disorderly not because it was blasphemous, but because it was an ‘act of desecration’ that provoked those who see it as blasphemous—namely Muslims—to commit acts of violence. If the Crown wins, it will mean we effectively have a Muslim blasphemy law in the UK. But if Hamit wins, it will be a victory for all of us who believe in freedom of expression and the fundamental liberty to criticise ANY religion. The FSU continues to stand with Hamit. We’ve arranged for the same top legal team who won the case in the Crown Court – Tim Owen KC and Rosalind Comyn, instructed by 3D Solicitors – to represent him.

The Free Speech Union

76,541 views • 8 months ago