Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This isn’t really about Erika being CEO. It’s about whether a man’s intimate knowledge of his wife dies with him. Charlie knew Erika better than any board, any podcaster, any X influencer, any keyboard warrior, or any Candace Owens groupie. He knew what was best for her and their...

bren45000's profile picture

Bren

12,827 subscribers

113,534 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Watch Candace Owens' FLIP from praising Erika Kirk to SUDDENLY ATTACKING her. For months, Candace Owens has told her fans to “put themselves in Erika Kirk’s shoes,” insisting that Erika knew Charlie Kirk better than anyone and is a genuinely good person in a deeply loving marriage with Charlie. NOW SUDDENLY Candace expects people to forget she said all that and believe she knows better than Erika what Charlie Kirk wanted - apparently attacking his own grieving widow. If people can’t see that what Candace Owens is doing is a sick, shameless exploitation of Charlie Kirk’s death at this point, then they never will.
4:38

Watch Candace Owens' FLIP from praising Erika Kirk to SUDDENLY ATTACKING her. For months, Candace Owens has told her fans to “put themselves in Erika Kirk’s shoes,” insisting that Erika knew Charlie Kirk better than anyone and is a genuinely good person in a deeply loving marriage with Charlie. NOW SUDDENLY Candace expects people to forget she said all that and believe she knows better than Erika what Charlie Kirk wanted - apparently attacking his own grieving widow. If people can’t see that what Candace Owens is doing is a sick, shameless exploitation of Charlie Kirk’s death at this point, then they never will.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

73,025 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Candace Owens questions what happened in the last 7 months to make Erika Kirk fear for her safety. This is disgusting because Candace knows the answer to that question. What happened? Candace happened. Candace started a psychotic witch hunt against Erika and the people at TPUSA encouraging millions of psychopaths to target Erika with nonstop harassment. She told people that Erika was evil and that she killed her husband. She completely made up stories about fake military meetings. Gave her psycho fans the orders to track and follow Erika everywhere she goes. On multiple occasions she’s tried to convince her psycho fans that Erika isn’t even a human. She’s told her fans that Erika is a robot and has even suggested stabbing her and others to see if they bleed. Personally I believe that Candace Owens fans pose more of a threat to Erika and TPUSA than the left does.
0:43

Candace Owens questions what happened in the last 7 months to make Erika Kirk fear for her safety. This is disgusting because Candace knows the answer to that question. What happened? Candace happened. Candace started a psychotic witch hunt against Erika and the people at TPUSA encouraging millions of psychopaths to target Erika with nonstop harassment. She told people that Erika was evil and that she killed her husband. She completely made up stories about fake military meetings. Gave her psycho fans the orders to track and follow Erika everywhere she goes. On multiple occasions she’s tried to convince her psycho fans that Erika isn’t even a human. She’s told her fans that Erika is a robot and has even suggested stabbing her and others to see if they bleed. Personally I believe that Candace Owens fans pose more of a threat to Erika and TPUSA than the left does.

Cinema Shogun

22,099 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Once again, Candace references Charlie having been “very very very into” another woman (Sammie) before Erika. We get it. We all have crushes and relationships before getting married. But woman to woman, it’s disrespectful to publicly talk about how a man who’s not your husband was “very very very into” another woman before meeting his wife. Candace hates this woman. It’s clear she never even really was close with her. She has zero allegiance or loyalty to her. That’s explained only be Candace being secretly in love with Charlie and thus distancing from Charlie once he got with Erika. Given the fact she has no evidence Erika plotted or facilitated the murder of Charlie, the level of contempt is unreal. Again, only explained by jealousy. And if she was “best friends” with Charlie, it’s inexplicable that she never likewise got close to Erika.
0:50

Once again, Candace references Charlie having been “very very very into” another woman (Sammie) before Erika. We get it. We all have crushes and relationships before getting married. But woman to woman, it’s disrespectful to publicly talk about how a man who’s not your husband was “very very very into” another woman before meeting his wife. Candace hates this woman. It’s clear she never even really was close with her. She has zero allegiance or loyalty to her. That’s explained only be Candace being secretly in love with Charlie and thus distancing from Charlie once he got with Erika. Given the fact she has no evidence Erika plotted or facilitated the murder of Charlie, the level of contempt is unreal. Again, only explained by jealousy. And if she was “best friends” with Charlie, it’s inexplicable that she never likewise got close to Erika.

Natalie Jean Beisner

36,455 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 Alex Clark may have accidentally exposed a MASSIVE contradiction in the Charlie story… Erika publicly claimed she never knew about Charlie’s alleged text saying “they are going to kill me.” But now Alex appears to confirm people around Charlie DID know about the message — even discussing having him wear a vest because of safety concerns. That creates a huge problem: If people inside Charlie’s circle already knew about these texts and fears… how was Erika supposedly the ONLY person who didn’t know? Either Erika was not telling the truth publicly… or somehow everyone around Charlie knew except his own wife. Candace Owens Baron Coleman Stew Peters #candaceowens #charliekirk #erikakirk #tpusa
2:30

🚨 Alex Clark may have accidentally exposed a MASSIVE contradiction in the Charlie story… Erika publicly claimed she never knew about Charlie’s alleged text saying “they are going to kill me.” But now Alex appears to confirm people around Charlie DID know about the message — even discussing having him wear a vest because of safety concerns. That creates a huge problem: If people inside Charlie’s circle already knew about these texts and fears… how was Erika supposedly the ONLY person who didn’t know? Either Erika was not telling the truth publicly… or somehow everyone around Charlie knew except his own wife. Candace Owens Baron Coleman Stew Peters #candaceowens #charliekirk #erikakirk #tpusa

dailyfreddo

45,015 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“How did Erika Kirk scam a genius like Charlie? The more I hear her past interviews, the dumber she sounds.” Candace Owens is asked how Charlie could fall for Erika. Her answer is that “we’re all human, and we all make mistakes.” She suggests that Charlie didn’t know the real Erika, and if he had things might’ve been different. But sure, tell me this woman isn’t in love with Charlie and bitter towards Erika. This is a despicable way for a Christian woman to talk about her murdered “best friend” and the widow he leaves behind. But that’s the trap Candace and her fans fall into—for them to be right about even half of this, Charlie had to have been really dumb. And we’re not talking one or two big betrayals over the course of a life. We’re talking about being—according to Candace—“betrayed by EVERYONE.”
1:30

“How did Erika Kirk scam a genius like Charlie? The more I hear her past interviews, the dumber she sounds.” Candace Owens is asked how Charlie could fall for Erika. Her answer is that “we’re all human, and we all make mistakes.” She suggests that Charlie didn’t know the real Erika, and if he had things might’ve been different. But sure, tell me this woman isn’t in love with Charlie and bitter towards Erika. This is a despicable way for a Christian woman to talk about her murdered “best friend” and the widow he leaves behind. But that’s the trap Candace and her fans fall into—for them to be right about even half of this, Charlie had to have been really dumb. And we’re not talking one or two big betrayals over the course of a life. We’re talking about being—according to Candace—“betrayed by EVERYONE.”

Natalie Jean Beisner

44,068 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

How is what Erika Kirk did any different than grieving widows who lose their husbands in combat? Why are you guys making it look like it’s bad awful wrong and creepy? It’s not. People take video of funerals all the time. People take pictures of their dead loved ones all the time. Erika showed you her pain. That’s not weird or creepy. She showed you her nightmare and you guys dragged her for it. Dragged her in her grief. That’s a fucking problem bro. That’s why I stand for her. And combat Candace’s bullshit lies.
0:49

How is what Erika Kirk did any different than grieving widows who lose their husbands in combat? Why are you guys making it look like it’s bad awful wrong and creepy? It’s not. People take video of funerals all the time. People take pictures of their dead loved ones all the time. Erika showed you her pain. That’s not weird or creepy. She showed you her nightmare and you guys dragged her for it. Dragged her in her grief. That’s a fucking problem bro. That’s why I stand for her. And combat Candace’s bullshit lies.

Sassafrass84

73,842 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

So I happened to remember a clip of Candace right after Charlie was killed and her saying she loved Erika as soon as she met her. And she told him to go for it!! Now she’s saying basically Erika was just a rebound and she didn’t think Erika would be more than a girlfriend and that Erika basically was saying all the right things to get Charlie. However, Charlie’s recollection of how he fell in love with her is much different. Candace Baby you’re lying again. So which was it? You loved her and pushed him to go for it? Or you thought she was a rebound and would only ever be just a girlfriend until he found someone else? Candace can’t even stop lying. Sounds like he was falling from the first moment they met not that he was going to use Erika to make someone jealous. That wasn’t who Charlie was Candace. You made him sound so shallow and you know he wasn’t that type of man.
0:38

So I happened to remember a clip of Candace right after Charlie was killed and her saying she loved Erika as soon as she met her. And she told him to go for it!! Now she’s saying basically Erika was just a rebound and she didn’t think Erika would be more than a girlfriend and that Erika basically was saying all the right things to get Charlie. However, Charlie’s recollection of how he fell in love with her is much different. Candace Baby you’re lying again. So which was it? You loved her and pushed him to go for it? Or you thought she was a rebound and would only ever be just a girlfriend until he found someone else? Candace can’t even stop lying. Sounds like he was falling from the first moment they met not that he was going to use Erika to make someone jealous. That wasn’t who Charlie was Candace. You made him sound so shallow and you know he wasn’t that type of man.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

52,121 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Charlie meets Erika - They met at the office. Erika was introduced to Charlie at that time and they talked for a moment about a job. Then they were set to meet again. Charlie says when he DM’d her to Urgently meet up it was partially for an interview but “partially for something else”. Sounds like that meeting at the office had Charlie crushing on Erika. When they met up for dinner…… 15 MINUTES into it he knew he was going to date her. Not hours but 15 minutes into it. Then they went on a second date because he had to see her again immediately and then took her to Hawaii the NEXT day. Josh and Sarah was there. Interesting Candace because you said he only dated her as a rebound and when you met her you believed she would only be a girlfriend. And that Erika basically wore him down over time claiming to be a Godly woman. That’s not how it sounds coming from Charlie. Sounds to me at the first meeting at the office he liked her. He took her to HAWAII the week after meeting her for dinner. They had already been dating and already gone on vacation to Hawaii before you met her. Why would you think she was only going to be a girlfriend? I think you’re fibbing again Candace. I don’t think Charlie was using Erika to make anyone jealous. Besides that wouldn’t be a Christian thing to do and I don’t see Charlie being that way. You on the other hand…..were you trying to make Charlie jealous with George and getting engaged so fast? Just asking questions. Seems suspicious to me. Super sweet video of Charlie and Erika about their meeting. He looks so young.
0:56

Charlie meets Erika - They met at the office. Erika was introduced to Charlie at that time and they talked for a moment about a job. Then they were set to meet again. Charlie says when he DM’d her to Urgently meet up it was partially for an interview but “partially for something else”. Sounds like that meeting at the office had Charlie crushing on Erika. When they met up for dinner…… 15 MINUTES into it he knew he was going to date her. Not hours but 15 minutes into it. Then they went on a second date because he had to see her again immediately and then took her to Hawaii the NEXT day. Josh and Sarah was there. Interesting Candace because you said he only dated her as a rebound and when you met her you believed she would only be a girlfriend. And that Erika basically wore him down over time claiming to be a Godly woman. That’s not how it sounds coming from Charlie. Sounds to me at the first meeting at the office he liked her. He took her to HAWAII the week after meeting her for dinner. They had already been dating and already gone on vacation to Hawaii before you met her. Why would you think she was only going to be a girlfriend? I think you’re fibbing again Candace. I don’t think Charlie was using Erika to make anyone jealous. Besides that wouldn’t be a Christian thing to do and I don’t see Charlie being that way. You on the other hand…..were you trying to make Charlie jealous with George and getting engaged so fast? Just asking questions. Seems suspicious to me. Super sweet video of Charlie and Erika about their meeting. He looks so young.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

43,430 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk CAUGHT Lying —Candace Owens Drops PROOF Charlie Kirk KNEW They Were Coming For Him 24 Hours Before Assassination! 🧾 Coach Colin just dropped a must-watch breakdown of Candace Owens absolutely DESTROYING Erika Kirk's lies on the Jimmy Dore show yesterday. Remember Erika Kirk's Fox News interview where she flat-out claimed Charlie NEVER sent any such texts where Charlie said "They are going to kill me", that they "never existed," and she knew because she had his phone. She basically called Candace a liar. Well, guess what? That's the FIRST provable LIE from Erika herself. Immediate backlash hit her hard—and now Candace Owens has cornered them with undeniable receipts. Candace finally revealed what she's been holding back: Andrew Kolvet (that's right, TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet) told her DIRECTLY that Charlie Kirk texted him JUST 24 HOURS before his public execution: "They're going to kill me tomorrow." This is ON TOP of the receipts I already dropped—from Frank Turek and Harrison H. Smith ✞, both confirming Charlie sent them similar desperate messages in the days leading up to his assassination, begging for prayers because he KNEW they were coming for him. Why the cover-up? Why deny what multiple people received? Is she lying or did someone delete those messages from Charlie's phone before it made it back to Erika? If the latter that would be pretty incriminating, proving someone was trying to cover their tracks. And why is TPUSA acting like everything's fine instead of demanding REAL answers about who really took out Charlie? The deep state narrative is crumbling. A "lone shooter"? Please. Charlie KNEW something big—and they silenced him fast. Go FOLLOW Coach Colin and watch his FULL Video (link in the comments below) and wake up. The truth is coming out, and we won't let them bury it with Charlie. Tag someone who needs to see this. Those of us that can't be bought are demanding justice.🇺🇸
12:37

🚨BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk CAUGHT Lying —Candace Owens Drops PROOF Charlie Kirk KNEW They Were Coming For Him 24 Hours Before Assassination! 🧾 Coach Colin just dropped a must-watch breakdown of Candace Owens absolutely DESTROYING Erika Kirk's lies on the Jimmy Dore show yesterday. Remember Erika Kirk's Fox News interview where she flat-out claimed Charlie NEVER sent any such texts where Charlie said "They are going to kill me", that they "never existed," and she knew because she had his phone. She basically called Candace a liar. Well, guess what? That's the FIRST provable LIE from Erika herself. Immediate backlash hit her hard—and now Candace Owens has cornered them with undeniable receipts. Candace finally revealed what she's been holding back: Andrew Kolvet (that's right, TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet) told her DIRECTLY that Charlie Kirk texted him JUST 24 HOURS before his public execution: "They're going to kill me tomorrow." This is ON TOP of the receipts I already dropped—from Frank Turek and Harrison H. Smith ✞, both confirming Charlie sent them similar desperate messages in the days leading up to his assassination, begging for prayers because he KNEW they were coming for him. Why the cover-up? Why deny what multiple people received? Is she lying or did someone delete those messages from Charlie's phone before it made it back to Erika? If the latter that would be pretty incriminating, proving someone was trying to cover their tracks. And why is TPUSA acting like everything's fine instead of demanding REAL answers about who really took out Charlie? The deep state narrative is crumbling. A "lone shooter"? Please. Charlie KNEW something big—and they silenced him fast. Go FOLLOW Coach Colin and watch his FULL Video (link in the comments below) and wake up. The truth is coming out, and we won't let them bury it with Charlie. Tag someone who needs to see this. Those of us that can't be bought are demanding justice.🇺🇸

Project Constitution

19,485 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Candace Owens true colors are shining brightly in this new Erika Kirk “series”. The jealousy is really oozing out now. Here she fumes over the fact that Erika first met Charlie at an airport while he was on a trip with Candace. Candace questions why Erika never mentions that when talking about how they met. Sounds like Candace has been holding a grudge against Erika for a while now. She’s angry that Charlie was talking to women while on a trip with her. And years later she still hasn’t let that go. It’s all so obvious.
0:24

Candace Owens true colors are shining brightly in this new Erika Kirk “series”. The jealousy is really oozing out now. Here she fumes over the fact that Erika first met Charlie at an airport while he was on a trip with Candace. Candace questions why Erika never mentions that when talking about how they met. Sounds like Candace has been holding a grudge against Erika for a while now. She’s angry that Charlie was talking to women while on a trip with her. And years later she still hasn’t let that go. It’s all so obvious.

Cinema Shogun

18,217 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Candace Owens is so stupid and dishonest. Here she is trying to say Charlie Kirk wouldn’t have wanted Erika Kirk to take over TPUSA because he preached traditional values for men and women. Candace doubts that Charlie ever said that he wanted Erika Kirk to take over TPUSA if anything ever happened to him. Funny she says that now because several months ago she said that she heard from a donor who was at the meeting where Charlie said this and he told her that he heard him say this. Candace herself even said that she believes this donor. So she’s full of shit and contradicting herself already. Candace [I will attach that video on a comment to this post below]. More to the point though, Erika Kirk’s situation is different than those scenarios Charlie described. Charlie was talking about in an ideal situation there would be traditional gender roles in place. Erika’s husband was murdered in broad daylight. That’s different than being some sort of career striver who was trying to get to the top of the business world. Do you really not think Erika wouldn’t prefer to be at home with the kids right now if she could just have Charlie back? You’re an idiot.
2:29

Candace Owens is so stupid and dishonest. Here she is trying to say Charlie Kirk wouldn’t have wanted Erika Kirk to take over TPUSA because he preached traditional values for men and women. Candace doubts that Charlie ever said that he wanted Erika Kirk to take over TPUSA if anything ever happened to him. Funny she says that now because several months ago she said that she heard from a donor who was at the meeting where Charlie said this and he told her that he heard him say this. Candace herself even said that she believes this donor. So she’s full of shit and contradicting herself already. Candace [I will attach that video on a comment to this post below]. More to the point though, Erika Kirk’s situation is different than those scenarios Charlie described. Charlie was talking about in an ideal situation there would be traditional gender roles in place. Erika’s husband was murdered in broad daylight. That’s different than being some sort of career striver who was trying to get to the top of the business world. Do you really not think Erika wouldn’t prefer to be at home with the kids right now if she could just have Charlie back? You’re an idiot.

Jordan S90

11,708 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

If you watch Candace Owens’ series on Erika Kirk, ask yourself, “Is any of this actual evidence of wrongdoing on Erika's part, or is it merely insinuation of wrongdoing on Erika’s part?” I'm all about asking questions. We should always be skeptical of the official narrative. We should always question people definitively telling us something. Maybe you would've acted differently than Erika in her grief during the past five months. Grief hits everyone differently. But that does NOT make her complicit in her husband's murder. Erika wearing a sequined jumpsuit. Erika talking about merchandise as CEO of TPUSA on a video call with the company shortly after Charlie was assassinated. Erika texting a 15-year-old girl she was mentoring in pageantry. Erika spending time overseas doing work with orphanages. Erika crying over Charlie's casket in a video. I could go on… Are any of these incidents evidence of crimes? All of these examples are intended to spark emotion inside of you and manipulate you into believing salacious insinuations about Erika. The sober reality of the situation is that all evidence points to Tyler Robinson assassinating Charlie because of Charlie’s beliefs about transgenderism. But that airtight case isn’t as interesting as fantasy. Fact doesn't sell as well as fiction. So Candace Owens continues weaving webs of baseless, slanderous conspiracies.
3:37

If you watch Candace Owens’ series on Erika Kirk, ask yourself, “Is any of this actual evidence of wrongdoing on Erika's part, or is it merely insinuation of wrongdoing on Erika’s part?” I'm all about asking questions. We should always be skeptical of the official narrative. We should always question people definitively telling us something. Maybe you would've acted differently than Erika in her grief during the past five months. Grief hits everyone differently. But that does NOT make her complicit in her husband's murder. Erika wearing a sequined jumpsuit. Erika talking about merchandise as CEO of TPUSA on a video call with the company shortly after Charlie was assassinated. Erika texting a 15-year-old girl she was mentoring in pageantry. Erika spending time overseas doing work with orphanages. Erika crying over Charlie's casket in a video. I could go on… Are any of these incidents evidence of crimes? All of these examples are intended to spark emotion inside of you and manipulate you into believing salacious insinuations about Erika. The sober reality of the situation is that all evidence points to Tyler Robinson assassinating Charlie because of Charlie’s beliefs about transgenderism. But that airtight case isn’t as interesting as fantasy. Fact doesn't sell as well as fiction. So Candace Owens continues weaving webs of baseless, slanderous conspiracies.

Liz Wheeler

60,263 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Two months after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Megyn Kelly invited Erika Kirk as a guest for the final stop of her tour and this is how she introduced Erika: “Since she lost Charlie, that’s when she and I became friends. I had met Erika prior to Charlie’s death, but we didn’t know each other. Since then, I have had this incredible urge. It’s a strange urge because I have this huge urge to take care of her—to make sure nothing happens to her, not from the media, not from the terrible leftists who are hating, and certainly not from anybody who actually wishes to do her or her children, God forbid, any harm. But I also have, at the same time, this wish to be near her so she can heal me.” Now you tell me — do you really think people are paid to run smear campaigns, or is it because Megyn just comes across as fake and disingenuous, and people can see through her bullshit now? 🤷🏻‍♀️
0:59

Two months after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Megyn Kelly invited Erika Kirk as a guest for the final stop of her tour and this is how she introduced Erika: “Since she lost Charlie, that’s when she and I became friends. I had met Erika prior to Charlie’s death, but we didn’t know each other. Since then, I have had this incredible urge. It’s a strange urge because I have this huge urge to take care of her—to make sure nothing happens to her, not from the media, not from the terrible leftists who are hating, and certainly not from anybody who actually wishes to do her or her children, God forbid, any harm. But I also have, at the same time, this wish to be near her so she can heal me.” Now you tell me — do you really think people are paid to run smear campaigns, or is it because Megyn just comes across as fake and disingenuous, and people can see through her bullshit now? 🤷🏻‍♀️

Gina Milan

51,693 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Candace Owens is FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST this is why it's a bad idea to debate her. Just today responding to TPUSA/Blake Neff's claim Candace: "Accused us of lying about Charlie wanting Erika to take over for him if he died." She said: "It never happened." Watch Candace below ABSOLUTELY question the legitimacy of Charlie Kirk's plan that he laid out in his notebooks in case of his death that included Erika Kirk becoming CEO. There's a George Bernard Shaw quote about avoiding engaging with people who enjoy cheating or don't care about the rules: “Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.”
1:27

Candace Owens is FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST this is why it's a bad idea to debate her. Just today responding to TPUSA/Blake Neff's claim Candace: "Accused us of lying about Charlie wanting Erika to take over for him if he died." She said: "It never happened." Watch Candace below ABSOLUTELY question the legitimacy of Charlie Kirk's plan that he laid out in his notebooks in case of his death that included Erika Kirk becoming CEO. There's a George Bernard Shaw quote about avoiding engaging with people who enjoy cheating or don't care about the rules: “Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.”

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

104,199 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk's "ALIBI" Just Got Completely DESTROYED – Listen to What She Actually Said on Jesse Watters In her own Jesse Watters interview, Erika Kirk admits: Charlie was "at the office" all day on Sept 9. She never once says she was with him. They were "supposed to meet up" for dinner with a friend to pray before the event... wait – if she was really with Charlie "all day" in Tucson like Kolvet claims, why would she need to "meet up" with him? They would just go together. Her mom had a medical issue, so Erika stayed in Phoenix to care for her. Charlie came home alone that night. Their daughter Gigi woke up and slept in the master bed with Erika – so Erika told Charlie to sleep in Gigi's room for a better night's rest. Separate beds. Separate rooms. She didn't even see him the morning of Sept 10 – no goodbye kiss. Kolvet's "metadata proof" photo supposedly shows Erika having dinner with Charlie on Sept 9 – the exact day Erika herself says she wasn't with him all day, had to "meet up" if dinner happened, and slept in a completely different room. That photo covers ZERO of the critical window: September 8 evening (whistleblower sighting of Erika at Candlewood Suites on Fort Huachuca) leading into the mysterious Sept 9 early-morning activity. Candace has been crystal clear – the key sighting was Sept 8, with follow-up on Sept 9. Erika's own words leave Sept 8 wide open and cast massive doubt on Sept 9. Why push a mismatched photo as "definitive proof"? Why the coordinated spin and straw-man attacks? This isn't clarification. This is desperation. Charlie Kirk deserves the full, unfiltered truth. Candace Owens – we're standing with you 100%. The timeline doesn't lie. People do. No more deflection. The cracks are showing. 🔥
2:15

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk's "ALIBI" Just Got Completely DESTROYED – Listen to What She Actually Said on Jesse Watters In her own Jesse Watters interview, Erika Kirk admits: Charlie was "at the office" all day on Sept 9. She never once says she was with him. They were "supposed to meet up" for dinner with a friend to pray before the event... wait – if she was really with Charlie "all day" in Tucson like Kolvet claims, why would she need to "meet up" with him? They would just go together. Her mom had a medical issue, so Erika stayed in Phoenix to care for her. Charlie came home alone that night. Their daughter Gigi woke up and slept in the master bed with Erika – so Erika told Charlie to sleep in Gigi's room for a better night's rest. Separate beds. Separate rooms. She didn't even see him the morning of Sept 10 – no goodbye kiss. Kolvet's "metadata proof" photo supposedly shows Erika having dinner with Charlie on Sept 9 – the exact day Erika herself says she wasn't with him all day, had to "meet up" if dinner happened, and slept in a completely different room. That photo covers ZERO of the critical window: September 8 evening (whistleblower sighting of Erika at Candlewood Suites on Fort Huachuca) leading into the mysterious Sept 9 early-morning activity. Candace has been crystal clear – the key sighting was Sept 8, with follow-up on Sept 9. Erika's own words leave Sept 8 wide open and cast massive doubt on Sept 9. Why push a mismatched photo as "definitive proof"? Why the coordinated spin and straw-man attacks? This isn't clarification. This is desperation. Charlie Kirk deserves the full, unfiltered truth. Candace Owens – we're standing with you 100%. The timeline doesn't lie. People do. No more deflection. The cracks are showing. 🔥

Project Constitution

1,610,609 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Welp, there it is, guys. As if we didn’t already know—but it’s worth stating again. To the conservative Christian commentators—Michael Knowles, Matt Walsh, Megyn Kelly, and Brandon Tatum—who claim or ignore that Candace Owens isn’t accusing Erika Kirk of conspiring to murder her husband, Charlie Kirk. How much more proof do you need? She doesn’t believe Erika Kirk’s alibi (as if Erika even needed one in the first place). So now that Candace has come right out and said it plainly, are you going to call this wicked woman exactly what she is? A slanderer who is accusing innocent people at TPUSA of murdering Charlie Kirk? With zero evidence whatsoever, she’s also accusing Erika of conspiring to kill her husband—the father of her two now-fatherless children. Plain as day. Will you still bite your tongues? Michael Knowles Matt Walsh Megyn Kelly Brandon Tatum
0:27

Welp, there it is, guys. As if we didn’t already know—but it’s worth stating again. To the conservative Christian commentators—Michael Knowles, Matt Walsh, Megyn Kelly, and Brandon Tatum—who claim or ignore that Candace Owens isn’t accusing Erika Kirk of conspiring to murder her husband, Charlie Kirk. How much more proof do you need? She doesn’t believe Erika Kirk’s alibi (as if Erika even needed one in the first place). So now that Candace has come right out and said it plainly, are you going to call this wicked woman exactly what she is? A slanderer who is accusing innocent people at TPUSA of murdering Charlie Kirk? With zero evidence whatsoever, she’s also accusing Erika of conspiring to kill her husband—the father of her two now-fatherless children. Plain as day. Will you still bite your tongues? Michael Knowles Matt Walsh Megyn Kelly Brandon Tatum

Jordan S90

44,281 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“There are a lot of people.. that keep commenting about Erika Kirk and why she is so put together, why her speeches look performative, why does she look so cold even though she just lost her husband.. my answer to you is faith.” Absolutely 100% this!!! 🙏🏼🔥 “Who Erika Kirk is is the complete opposite of a lukewarm Christian. She is cloaked by Jesus and His love and His comfort.” “I really didn’t realize until yesterday how many of you didn’t actually know what a true, devoted follower of Christ looks like. What a lioness for Christ looks like.” “Don’t weaponize your lack of knowing and loving Jesus Christ as a way to put her down.”
2:11

“There are a lot of people.. that keep commenting about Erika Kirk and why she is so put together, why her speeches look performative, why does she look so cold even though she just lost her husband.. my answer to you is faith.” Absolutely 100% this!!! 🙏🏼🔥 “Who Erika Kirk is is the complete opposite of a lukewarm Christian. She is cloaked by Jesus and His love and His comfort.” “I really didn’t realize until yesterday how many of you didn’t actually know what a true, devoted follower of Christ looks like. What a lioness for Christ looks like.” “Don’t weaponize your lack of knowing and loving Jesus Christ as a way to put her down.”

TONY™

177,693 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨PART ONE: Aspen Donors BREAK Their Silence on the Allegedly FAKED Audio Of Charlie Wanting Erika Kirk To Be CEO —Charlie Kirk’s Alleged "Death Wish" CONTRADICTS His Entire Life’s Work🏔️🚫 Candace Owens just opened the floodgates on the "Shady Bunch" at TPUSA, and she’s using a new word of the day: Mythomania. It’s the pathological tendency to lie and overthink until you accidentally incriminate yourself. The Aspen "Transcript": When Candace sat down with Erika Kirk on December 15th, she wasn't even questioning the CEO transition. She assumed it was a symbolic move for public morale. But TPUSA overthought it. Without being asked, they shoved a "transcript" in her face from an August donor meeting in Aspen, claiming Charlie hand-picked Erika to lead in the event of his death. The Red Flags: The 180-Degree Turn: Charlie Kirk built his entire platform on the idea that women should not be corporate CEOs, especially mothers of young children. Are we to believe he suddenly reversed his lifelong worldview just three weeks before he died? The "Single Mother" Narrative: Erika has been curating a story about her mother being a "blueprint" for a single-mother CEO—except Candace revealed Erika grew up with a stepfather and a present father. It’s a curated backstory for a pre-planned role. The AmFest "Walkout" Audio: This is where it gets truly bizarre. At AmFest, TPUSA played audio of Charlie allegedly appointing Erika. But there was no video. Think about the logic: If you have 4K video of Charlie Kirk’s final "vision-casting" moment where he blesses his wife as his successor, that is the most powerful PR tool in history. Why would you strip the video and only play the audio? The "Franken-Audio" Analysis: If you listen closely to the clip (which Candace did), the ending is jarring. Charlie talks about the board "figuring it out," and then a clunky, out-of-place edit jumps in: "I appoint my wife..." It’s edited. It’s unnatural. It’s Franken-audio. Candace spoke to people who were at that Aspen meeting. Their response? Charlie never said that. 🚫 Was the "CEO" title a reward for silence? Was the audio fabricated to justify a takeover that Charlie never wanted? The "unnecessary complexity" is starting to look like a cover-up. 🏗️⚔️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. 👇
9:38

🚨PART ONE: Aspen Donors BREAK Their Silence on the Allegedly FAKED Audio Of Charlie Wanting Erika Kirk To Be CEO —Charlie Kirk’s Alleged "Death Wish" CONTRADICTS His Entire Life’s Work🏔️🚫 Candace Owens just opened the floodgates on the "Shady Bunch" at TPUSA, and she’s using a new word of the day: Mythomania. It’s the pathological tendency to lie and overthink until you accidentally incriminate yourself. The Aspen "Transcript": When Candace sat down with Erika Kirk on December 15th, she wasn't even questioning the CEO transition. She assumed it was a symbolic move for public morale. But TPUSA overthought it. Without being asked, they shoved a "transcript" in her face from an August donor meeting in Aspen, claiming Charlie hand-picked Erika to lead in the event of his death. The Red Flags: The 180-Degree Turn: Charlie Kirk built his entire platform on the idea that women should not be corporate CEOs, especially mothers of young children. Are we to believe he suddenly reversed his lifelong worldview just three weeks before he died? The "Single Mother" Narrative: Erika has been curating a story about her mother being a "blueprint" for a single-mother CEO—except Candace revealed Erika grew up with a stepfather and a present father. It’s a curated backstory for a pre-planned role. The AmFest "Walkout" Audio: This is where it gets truly bizarre. At AmFest, TPUSA played audio of Charlie allegedly appointing Erika. But there was no video. Think about the logic: If you have 4K video of Charlie Kirk’s final "vision-casting" moment where he blesses his wife as his successor, that is the most powerful PR tool in history. Why would you strip the video and only play the audio? The "Franken-Audio" Analysis: If you listen closely to the clip (which Candace did), the ending is jarring. Charlie talks about the board "figuring it out," and then a clunky, out-of-place edit jumps in: "I appoint my wife..." It’s edited. It’s unnatural. It’s Franken-audio. Candace spoke to people who were at that Aspen meeting. Their response? Charlie never said that. 🚫 Was the "CEO" title a reward for silence? Was the audio fabricated to justify a takeover that Charlie never wanted? The "unnecessary complexity" is starting to look like a cover-up. 🏗️⚔️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

46,286 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨SHOCKING BETRAYAL: Erika’s BFF Sensed "Danger" & Saved Her Own Kid... But Stayed Silent on Charlie.😱 We are way past coincidences. We are now playing a toddler's game of Blue's Clues because the truth is staring us right in the face. Candace just dropped a BOMBSHELL that destroys the entire narrative around Charlie’s assassination: Erika Kirk’s best friend of 15 years, Tracy Martin, STOPPED her own daughter from going to the UVU event because she had a "bad feeling." Here is the kicker: Her daughter is Erika Kirk's personal assistant. So let me get this straight... Tracy senses "danger" strong enough to keep her daughter from going to work that day. She DOESN'T warn her best friend (Erika) whose husband is heading into that exact danger? Erika DOESN'T ask why her own assistant is refusing to show up for the biggest event of the week? While we are told Charlie was "excited like a kid on Christmas," the people closest to his wife were terrified enough to stay home. They saved themselves, but they let Charlie walk right into the trap. This isn't "mommy intuition." It looks a lot like prior knowledge. And if you believe the official story after hearing this, Candace says it best: "You are asking me to be an idiot." FOLLOW Candace Owens, Watch her FULL episode linked below, and RT if you believe It’s time for a police interrogation. NOW.
11:44

🚨SHOCKING BETRAYAL: Erika’s BFF Sensed "Danger" & Saved Her Own Kid... But Stayed Silent on Charlie.😱 We are way past coincidences. We are now playing a toddler's game of Blue's Clues because the truth is staring us right in the face. Candace just dropped a BOMBSHELL that destroys the entire narrative around Charlie’s assassination: Erika Kirk’s best friend of 15 years, Tracy Martin, STOPPED her own daughter from going to the UVU event because she had a "bad feeling." Here is the kicker: Her daughter is Erika Kirk's personal assistant. So let me get this straight... Tracy senses "danger" strong enough to keep her daughter from going to work that day. She DOESN'T warn her best friend (Erika) whose husband is heading into that exact danger? Erika DOESN'T ask why her own assistant is refusing to show up for the biggest event of the week? While we are told Charlie was "excited like a kid on Christmas," the people closest to his wife were terrified enough to stay home. They saved themselves, but they let Charlie walk right into the trap. This isn't "mommy intuition." It looks a lot like prior knowledge. And if you believe the official story after hearing this, Candace says it best: "You are asking me to be an idiot." FOLLOW Candace Owens, Watch her FULL episode linked below, and RT if you believe It’s time for a police interrogation. NOW.

Project Constitution

35,728 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨BOMBSHELL: Candace Says Erika Kirk ORCHESTRATED The 2018 Kanye-Candace FALLOUT—Was Kanye's Tweet In Support Of Candace The Catalyst For Charlie And Candace Being TARGETED? 🕵️‍♀️💣 Candace Owens just revealed a bombshell that changes everything we know about the 2018 fallout between her, Charlie, and Kanye West. The Receipts: The "Invisible" Hand: Candace is 100% certain—with proof—that while she and Charlie were devastated by Kanye’s "distancing" tweet, Erika Kirk was behind the scenes bragging that her "family" connections to Kanye’s circle forced his hand. The Infiltration: Erika was "back-dialing" and pushing for that tweet to go out, all while playing the part of the supportive girlfriend to Charlie. The Timeline: Just weeks after Charlie predicted he might be "wiped out," Erika suddenly appears at a "job interview" with the CEO at a private NYC restaurant—not how TPUSA actually hires. Candace says it herself: Erika Kirk is a "whole fraud." Was she sent to rip the movement apart from the inside? 🧐 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT, and watch her FULL episode below! 👇
9:27

🚨BOMBSHELL: Candace Says Erika Kirk ORCHESTRATED The 2018 Kanye-Candace FALLOUT—Was Kanye's Tweet In Support Of Candace The Catalyst For Charlie And Candace Being TARGETED? 🕵️‍♀️💣 Candace Owens just revealed a bombshell that changes everything we know about the 2018 fallout between her, Charlie, and Kanye West. The Receipts: The "Invisible" Hand: Candace is 100% certain—with proof—that while she and Charlie were devastated by Kanye’s "distancing" tweet, Erika Kirk was behind the scenes bragging that her "family" connections to Kanye’s circle forced his hand. The Infiltration: Erika was "back-dialing" and pushing for that tweet to go out, all while playing the part of the supportive girlfriend to Charlie. The Timeline: Just weeks after Charlie predicted he might be "wiped out," Erika suddenly appears at a "job interview" with the CEO at a private NYC restaurant—not how TPUSA actually hires. Candace says it herself: Erika Kirk is a "whole fraud." Was she sent to rip the movement apart from the inside? 🧐 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT, and watch her FULL episode below! 👇

Project Constitution

74,596 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten