Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This issue transcends politics. Imran Khan’s health cannot be reduced to a single medical report, an isolated reading, or competing claims from different sides. A credible assessment requires his complete medical history, established baseline, medications, ongoing readings, and independent specialist evaluation. It is time to move beyond speculation, secrecy,...

97,097 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Beebarg Baloch, a young paraplegic man, was taken for surgery today while still in illegal detention. Despite his severe medical condition, he has been denied the care and environment required for his survival. Beebarg has been paralyzed from the waist down and needs continuous physical support from 2–3 individuals for essential tasks such as toileting, changing positions, and transferring between his wheelchair and bed. These are basic human needs, yet he has been forced to endure them inside a prison cell. Even after surgery, authorities plan to send him back to jail. This cruel decision disregards all medical ethics and international human rights standards. Returning a paralyzed patient to detention without rehabilitation care risks severe infection, bedsores, and further complications that could become life-threatening. Beebarg’s case reflects the deep inhumanity of targeting a paralyzed individual for political reasons. No system that claims to uphold justice can justify keeping a disabled person in such degrading conditions. We urge the international community, human rights defenders, and medical associations to speak out. Beebarg Baloch must be released immediately and provided with urgent medical care under professional supervision. His continued detention is a violation of both humanity and law. Human Rights Watch Amnesty International UN Special Procedures Front Line Defenders Mary Lawlor Human Rights Commission of Pakistan

Sabiha Baloch

14,899 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEW: 🚨 Self Proclaimed “Physician” Abdul El-Sayed Once Admitted On Audio He Was Only “Cosplaying As A Doctor” 🚨 Abdul El-Sayed repeatedly presents himself as a “physician” and “medical doctor” on the campaign trail, in bios, LinkedIn, and interviews, yet his own words prove he’s been overstating his position. Michigan Jihadist Democrat Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed Dr. Abdul El-Sayed has made his so called “medical credentials” a centerpiece of his pitch to voters. He often calls himself a physician and he regularly says, “I’ve been a doctor my whole career.” His LinkedIn lists him as a physician. However, records tell a different story. He has never held a medical license in Michigan or New York. His documented hands-on patient care consists of a four-week sub-internship (a clinical rotation) at a small Manhattan hospital at the end of medical school. In a 2022 podcast, El-Sayed himself described that experience this way: his “job was to be the, like, worst doctor on the team” and he was “cosplaying a doctor.” Listen to him say this in his own words below. 👇🏻 He earned an MD from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons (after time at the University of Michigan Medical School) and he has worked in epidemiology and as Detroit’s health officer where he oversaw the slaughter of nearly 4,000 innocent dogs and cats that were held at Detroit animal control. An MD is an academic degree. A licensed, practicing physician is someone who completed residency, passed boards, obtained a state license, and treats patients under ongoing regulatory oversight on a regular basis. El-Sayed has not done the latter, and thus, he should stop referring to himself as a practicing physician. Abdul’s Islamic ideology compels him and encourages him to lie to non-Muslims for the purpose of advancing Islam, which is why he feels comfortable lying to Michigan voters about being a “practicing physican”. This is called Taqiyya, and it’s the foundation of Abdul’s US Senate campaign. In his own words, Abdul was only “cosplaying” as a doctor, specifically the worst doctor. Michigan voters, BEWARE!

Laura Loomer

254,984 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Alastor’s refusal to step in and help with chaos at the hotel at the beginning of Season 2 is absolutely a defensive recoil after the physical (and psychological) damage he experienced after his defeat by Adam. It wasn’t just his angelic injury that caused this dismissive nature, the idea of dying an altruist fully destabilizes the narrative Alastor’s constructed for himself. To die a martyr on behalf of the hotel would retroactively rewrite his afterlife as service rather than sovereignty. When Vaggie and Husk ask for Alastor to help, Alastor withdraws entirely, fully posturing as someone who just enjoys being difficult and doesn’t care. Clearly, if he cannot control the outcome, he will refuse participation entirely. Still, there’s a deeper narrative tension building here — the hotel promising (and delivering) on redemption is in direct contrast to Alastor’s worldview. The hotel is no longer a spectacle for him to be entertained by, but a project that threatens the hierarchies of Hell Alastor had worked to establish himself within even before his human death. Alastor cannot tolerate these positions where he must rely on others or act altruistically. Those positions strip him of narrative agency, of the control and self-preservation critical to his character. This refusal to assist the hotel isn’t just Alastor’s classic brattiness, it is a defensive maneuver designed to restore his sense of autonomy.

⊹ ࣪ ˖ ၊၊||၊ ⋆˙alastor fm 𐂂 (🎙)

18,725 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Delusional? When Religion Is Mocked for Politics The recent remarks made by the U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth are deeply inflammatory and deserving of serious criticism. While addressing Iran’s nuclear issue, he referred to Islamic prophecies as “delusional.” Such language is not only disrespectful to millions of Muslims worldwide, but it also dangerously shifts what is presented as a political and strategic matter into the realm of religious confrontation. If the U.S. position toward Iran is truly grounded in national security and geopolitical considerations, then invoking and mocking religious beliefs undermines that claim. Introducing theology into a political conflict exposes bias and damages credibility. It sends a troubling signal that the issue is not purely strategic, but ideologically charged. Now compare it with the statement of US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee few weeks ago when in an interview with Tucker Carlson , he expressed that Israel has a divine right to whole of Middle east from the Nile river in Egypt to Euphrates in Iraq, and "it would be fine if they take it all" as it has been promised in Genesis 15 to the descendants of Abraham. One must ask: if someone were to describe those biblical prophecies as “delusional,” would that not immediately be condemned as offensive or even antisemitic? Respect for faith cannot be selective. Even while defining "delusion" in terms of psychiatry, they exclude religious beliefs. Transforming a geopolitical conflict into a theological or ideological struggle is reckless and dangerous. It deepens divisions, fuels resentment, and risks escalating tensions far beyond diplomatic or strategic boundaries. Political disputes must remain political; once they are framed as religious battles, the consequences become far more volatile. Such statements deserve clear condemnation from Muslim leaders and from all those who believe in equal respect for religious traditions. Making a political war theological and ideological is dangerous and it shows how the 350 million Americans have been told a lie that it is a war for their security. --------------------------------------------------- Ryan Grim Mehdi Hasan Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani Murtaza Hussain Moeed Pirzada

Dr Waqas Nawaz

11,357 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

If Peter Obi truly said, “Nobody knows the qualifications required to be Nigerian President,” then that statement deserves serious scrutiny. Because Nigeria’s Constitution is not silent on who is qualified to contest for President. There are clearly stated constitutional requirements covering citizenship, age, political-party sponsorship and educational qualification. So the real question is not whether “nobody knows.” The real question is: does a man seeking to lead Nigeria understand the constitutional framework governing the very office he wants to occupy? This is where leadership must go beyond popularity, emotional appeal and social-media enthusiasm. A presidential candidate should understand the Constitution. He should understand the powers of the office. He should understand the limits of the office. He should understand the qualifications for seeking that office. Nigeria is too complicated to be governed by vibes. The presidency is not an experiment. It is an institution governed by law. Peter Obi’s supporters may defend the statement as context, humour or rhetoric, and that context should be considered. But if the statement is being presented literally, then Nigerians are entitled to ask uncomfortable questions. Before anyone asks for the keys to Aso Rock, Nigerians should first ask: Does he understand the constitutional door he is trying to enter? 2027 should be about competence, preparation, constitutional literacy and capacity. Not just popularity.

ADC Vanguard

22,342 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat