Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This man got pulled over for a traffic stop in another state while driving home. The officer asked him for his information, the man gave it to him. The officer came back, gave him the ticket, told him where to appear if he wanted to contest and pointed out...

TheEXECUTlONER_'s profile picture

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

302,193 subscribers

77,679 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаЗдоровье и велнес
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?
1:00

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,681 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.
6:08

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

193,729 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Police Broke Down Door in Mistaken Identity Case in Baton Rouge Officers asked for Brooks’ name. He refused to answer and asked them to get off his property. The video shows officers following him, kicking open his door, and detaining him. Shortly after, the officers put Brooks in handcuffs. He said he then told officers his name, and that is when they realized they had the wrong person. “What took place was, you were mistaken for someone else. We got a call that said the person that we were looking for was at this house, and when they pulled up, you looked just like that person,” another officer said.
1:54

Police Broke Down Door in Mistaken Identity Case in Baton Rouge Officers asked for Brooks’ name. He refused to answer and asked them to get off his property. The video shows officers following him, kicking open his door, and detaining him. Shortly after, the officers put Brooks in handcuffs. He said he then told officers his name, and that is when they realized they had the wrong person. “What took place was, you were mistaken for someone else. We got a call that said the person that we were looking for was at this house, and when they pulled up, you looked just like that person,” another officer said.

American Crime Stories

15,630 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

On behalf of the largest police news outlet in the world, we're officially calling for the resignation or termination of this officer IMMEDIATELY. A female Fort Worth police officer was caught on camera threatening to ticket a retired federal law enforcement officer and Christian street preacher for “offensive speech.” The officer told the man that if someone is offended by his preaching, then “we have a problem” and said she would issue him a ticket. When he asked if she was really going to ticket him for offensive speech, she replied, “Yes, I am.” This is a blatant violation of the First Amendment. Police officers do not have the authority to ticket people for speech that offends others. That is the exact opposite of how freedom of speech works in America. The fact that this officer targeted a retired federal law enforcement officer who was simply preaching makes this even more unacceptable. Departments that employ officers who openly disregard the Constitution need to clean house. This kind of behavior erodes public trust and makes every good officer’s job harder. Pass this along so more people see what is happening on our streets. #FortWorthPD #FirstAmendment
1:02

On behalf of the largest police news outlet in the world, we're officially calling for the resignation or termination of this officer IMMEDIATELY. A female Fort Worth police officer was caught on camera threatening to ticket a retired federal law enforcement officer and Christian street preacher for “offensive speech.” The officer told the man that if someone is offended by his preaching, then “we have a problem” and said she would issue him a ticket. When he asked if she was really going to ticket him for offensive speech, she replied, “Yes, I am.” This is a blatant violation of the First Amendment. Police officers do not have the authority to ticket people for speech that offends others. That is the exact opposite of how freedom of speech works in America. The fact that this officer targeted a retired federal law enforcement officer who was simply preaching makes this even more unacceptable. Departments that employ officers who openly disregard the Constitution need to clean house. This kind of behavior erodes public trust and makes every good officer’s job harder. Pass this along so more people see what is happening on our streets. #FortWorthPD #FirstAmendment

Blue Lives Matter

1,529,262 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A black man from Chicago walked into a restaurant, ordered a drink, and the manager told him he had to pay first. He asked other people there if they had to pay first; they said no. Then he asked the manager why he had to pay first. The manager said it was normal. He thinks they're being racist towards him because he's black. What do you think of this situation?
2:58

A black man from Chicago walked into a restaurant, ordered a drink, and the manager told him he had to pay first. He asked other people there if they had to pay first; they said no. Then he asked the manager why he had to pay first. The manager said it was normal. He thinks they're being racist towards him because he's black. What do you think of this situation?

Goofies Of Chicago

30,362 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This out of control officer gets owned as he pulls his gun on this guy because he reached for his wallet. Keep in mind the officer asked him to present his ID. Things escalate to where the officer threatened to violently pull him from his vehicle. The man asked to wait for backup. When they arrived he alerted he has everything on video. The man was thus told he was free to go and he answered then I'm free to stay and told the first officer what he thought of him exercising his freedom of speech.
0:51

This out of control officer gets owned as he pulls his gun on this guy because he reached for his wallet. Keep in mind the officer asked him to present his ID. Things escalate to where the officer threatened to violently pull him from his vehicle. The man asked to wait for backup. When they arrived he alerted he has everything on video. The man was thus told he was free to go and he answered then I'm free to stay and told the first officer what he thought of him exercising his freedom of speech.

Chuckling Charlie

41,369 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

How bold this officer is with violating the rights of this man. Illegally searched his weapon in an open carry state. Took his personal property and refused to return it. Refused to get a supervisor out at the scene. Flat out said no. He assaulted the man by aggressively grabbing him. The list goes on and on. This officer should be relieved of duty. Also every other officer that pulled up should be investigated for not shutting down this tyrant. Know your rights folks and do not allow them to infringe on your 2A or any other right.
12:00

How bold this officer is with violating the rights of this man. Illegally searched his weapon in an open carry state. Took his personal property and refused to return it. Refused to get a supervisor out at the scene. Flat out said no. He assaulted the man by aggressively grabbing him. The list goes on and on. This officer should be relieved of duty. Also every other officer that pulled up should be investigated for not shutting down this tyrant. Know your rights folks and do not allow them to infringe on your 2A or any other right.

Giggling Ganon

32,893 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This man was trying to take his pregnant wife that's having severe labor pains to the hospital. They have had a previous 26 week pre-mature baby. This police officer pulled him over for speeding. The man even asked the cop if he could give him an escort to the hospital and then write the ticket or even arrest him? He just wants to get to the hospital. I back the blue, I do, I do, but it seems to me that this was not handled properly. Would you have handled it this way? 🤔
2:39

This man was trying to take his pregnant wife that's having severe labor pains to the hospital. They have had a previous 26 week pre-mature baby. This police officer pulled him over for speeding. The man even asked the cop if he could give him an escort to the hospital and then write the ticket or even arrest him? He just wants to get to the hospital. I back the blue, I do, I do, but it seems to me that this was not handled properly. Would you have handled it this way? 🤔

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

29,679 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This man was arrested at Fort Walton Beach in Florida for being in the water. Apparently he grabbed his boogie board and sprinted into the ocean. 🌊 🏃🏻‍♂️ They had told him to get out of the water. Double Red flags were in effect. You can see that the officer had to physically take him down in the sand with help from others and handcuff him. 😳 People said that he told police and lifeguards that it was federal water and that he should be allowed to swim. Some said why can’t we live at our own risk? That he should be allowed to do what he wants. Others said they possibly saved his life and he doesn’t even know it. I have never seen that happen before, but I understand it. Have you ever witnessed this happen before, someone getting arrested for going in the water? Do you think it is a good look? Or who cares about looks, they saved his life and you have to follow the rules?
0:51

This man was arrested at Fort Walton Beach in Florida for being in the water. Apparently he grabbed his boogie board and sprinted into the ocean. 🌊 🏃🏻‍♂️ They had told him to get out of the water. Double Red flags were in effect. You can see that the officer had to physically take him down in the sand with help from others and handcuff him. 😳 People said that he told police and lifeguards that it was federal water and that he should be allowed to swim. Some said why can’t we live at our own risk? That he should be allowed to do what he wants. Others said they possibly saved his life and he doesn’t even know it. I have never seen that happen before, but I understand it. Have you ever witnessed this happen before, someone getting arrested for going in the water? Do you think it is a good look? Or who cares about looks, they saved his life and you have to follow the rules?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

82,989 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dude rips into tyrant officer who lied about the reason he pulled him over. ​The video starts with Officer Nablo pulling over a motorcyclist right outside his own home. Right out of the gate, the officer asks didn't you hear me when I was trying to pull you over? The rider said no, because he has a Bluetooth speaker in his helmet. The officer falsely claims having helmet speakers is illegal (spoiler: it’s not). So this was off to a wonderful start. ​When the rider directly asks, "Why are you pulling me over first?" the officer completely deflects, stating it's simply "to ID who you are." That is a massive red flag. Officers need reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to initiate a traffic stop—they cannot just pull you over to demand papers and see who you are. ​It isn't until long after the confrontation begins, after the officer has already demanded ID, that he walks to the back of the motorcycle to look for a retroactive justification. He then tries to claim that the plate has to be visible and says he can't see the plate. The rider pushes back calling out it officer for lying. After getting the ID and running the plate the officer did happen to get lucky as he discovered the vehicle registration expired , meaning it is expired. ​The rider immediately calls out the absolute hypocrisy and shifting narrative: ​The officer first claimed he couldn't see the license plate at all. ​Yet, the officer simultaneously claimed he pulled the rider over because he knew the registration on that very plate was expired. ​How can you pull someone over for an expired plate that you just admitted you couldn't even see until after you detached him from the bike? It makes zero sense. ​Failure to Yield or Safe Stopping Point? ​Officer Nablo tries to claim the rider was "failing to yield" and evading the stop because he didn't pull over the exact second the lights went on. However, the rider stands his ground, explaining that he did not flee; he simply continued riding a short distance to his own home where he felt safe and where he had multiple security cameras recording the interaction. ​ ​This doesn't seem to be a random encounter, either. The rider alleges a disturbing pattern of personal harassment from Officer Nablo, claiming this exact same officer previously came onto his property and threatened to shoot his dog just for barking inside the house. ​ ​Eventually, a supervisor/sergeant steps in to de-escalate the hostile officer. The supervisor confirms that the citations for the expired registration will be sent by mail and that the rider has 10 days to contest them. When the rider demands to file a formal complaint for harassment, the supervisor instructs him that individual officer complaints must be taken up directly with the Chief of Police. ​The rider made it clear this is going straight to court and social media. ​What do you think? Was this officer legitimately enforcing traffic laws, or was he a tyrant fishing for a reason to flex his badge?
6:59

Dude rips into tyrant officer who lied about the reason he pulled him over. ​The video starts with Officer Nablo pulling over a motorcyclist right outside his own home. Right out of the gate, the officer asks didn't you hear me when I was trying to pull you over? The rider said no, because he has a Bluetooth speaker in his helmet. The officer falsely claims having helmet speakers is illegal (spoiler: it’s not). So this was off to a wonderful start. ​When the rider directly asks, "Why are you pulling me over first?" the officer completely deflects, stating it's simply "to ID who you are." That is a massive red flag. Officers need reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to initiate a traffic stop—they cannot just pull you over to demand papers and see who you are. ​It isn't until long after the confrontation begins, after the officer has already demanded ID, that he walks to the back of the motorcycle to look for a retroactive justification. He then tries to claim that the plate has to be visible and says he can't see the plate. The rider pushes back calling out it officer for lying. After getting the ID and running the plate the officer did happen to get lucky as he discovered the vehicle registration expired , meaning it is expired. ​The rider immediately calls out the absolute hypocrisy and shifting narrative: ​The officer first claimed he couldn't see the license plate at all. ​Yet, the officer simultaneously claimed he pulled the rider over because he knew the registration on that very plate was expired. ​How can you pull someone over for an expired plate that you just admitted you couldn't even see until after you detached him from the bike? It makes zero sense. ​Failure to Yield or Safe Stopping Point? ​Officer Nablo tries to claim the rider was "failing to yield" and evading the stop because he didn't pull over the exact second the lights went on. However, the rider stands his ground, explaining that he did not flee; he simply continued riding a short distance to his own home where he felt safe and where he had multiple security cameras recording the interaction. ​ ​This doesn't seem to be a random encounter, either. The rider alleges a disturbing pattern of personal harassment from Officer Nablo, claiming this exact same officer previously came onto his property and threatened to shoot his dog just for barking inside the house. ​ ​Eventually, a supervisor/sergeant steps in to de-escalate the hostile officer. The supervisor confirms that the citations for the expired registration will be sent by mail and that the rider has 10 days to contest them. When the rider demands to file a formal complaint for harassment, the supervisor instructs him that individual officer complaints must be taken up directly with the Chief of Police. ​The rider made it clear this is going straight to court and social media. ​What do you think? Was this officer legitimately enforcing traffic laws, or was he a tyrant fishing for a reason to flex his badge?

Giggling Ganon

723,794 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This man claims to be a police officer and openly threatened that anyone who records him while on duty won’t only be shot by him, but even innocent people nearby could be hit by his gunfire. He also said the police boss who encouraged citizens to record officers would be the one to bury them. This is disturbing and honestly very scary.
2:22

This man claims to be a police officer and openly threatened that anyone who records him while on duty won’t only be shot by him, but even innocent people nearby could be hit by his gunfire. He also said the police boss who encouraged citizens to record officers would be the one to bury them. This is disturbing and honestly very scary.

Kunmi Àgbà Farmer

510,346 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨#BREAKING: Tyjuan Crenshaw, a man who works with special needs children, saw a young man being BEATEN IN THE STREET. He stepped in and saved the man and chased the attacker off... ...AND THE POLICE ARRESTED HIM FOR IT He was charged with assault. Tyjuan is a MANDATORY REPORTER because he works with special needs kids. He is LEGALLY REQUIRED to step in when he sees a vulnerable person being abused. Crenshaw says he saw a man beating a vulnerable young man on Baylor's Lane in Petersburg, Virginia. In his words: "He was beating the hell out of him. After he dropped, he hit him across his head five more times." So Crenshaw stepped in. He says the man told him to mind his own business... then went and got a dog to sic on him. He stood his ground and protected the man until the police got there. When the police showed up, they arrested CRENSHAW. Charged him with assault and listed the man he was trying to stop as the VICTIM!!! But here's the kicker. TWO DAYS LATER, police arrested that same man, Harold Parker, and charged him with ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF AN INCAPACITATED ADULT. The exact thing Crenshaw said he was trying to stop! So the man who stepped in to protect the vulnerable is facing charges. When asked if he would do anything different, Crenshaw said: "If I had to do it all over, I'd do it again!"
1:17

🚨#BREAKING: Tyjuan Crenshaw, a man who works with special needs children, saw a young man being BEATEN IN THE STREET. He stepped in and saved the man and chased the attacker off... ...AND THE POLICE ARRESTED HIM FOR IT He was charged with assault. Tyjuan is a MANDATORY REPORTER because he works with special needs kids. He is LEGALLY REQUIRED to step in when he sees a vulnerable person being abused. Crenshaw says he saw a man beating a vulnerable young man on Baylor's Lane in Petersburg, Virginia. In his words: "He was beating the hell out of him. After he dropped, he hit him across his head five more times." So Crenshaw stepped in. He says the man told him to mind his own business... then went and got a dog to sic on him. He stood his ground and protected the man until the police got there. When the police showed up, they arrested CRENSHAW. Charged him with assault and listed the man he was trying to stop as the VICTIM!!! But here's the kicker. TWO DAYS LATER, police arrested that same man, Harold Parker, and charged him with ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF AN INCAPACITATED ADULT. The exact thing Crenshaw said he was trying to stop! So the man who stepped in to protect the vulnerable is facing charges. When asked if he would do anything different, Crenshaw said: "If I had to do it all over, I'd do it again!"

Matt Van Swol

116,863 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.
0:57

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.

Giggling Ganon

30,366 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This is unbelievable, the police officer that was sent round to warn someone about attending a local protest is under investigation because he basically said he didnt want to actually do it and he laughed.. to all Police Officers... is this what u signed up for when you joined the Police? Every time you question anything or simply dont want to follow orders this could be you... 🤬
1:16

This is unbelievable, the police officer that was sent round to warn someone about attending a local protest is under investigation because he basically said he didnt want to actually do it and he laughed.. to all Police Officers... is this what u signed up for when you joined the Police? Every time you question anything or simply dont want to follow orders this could be you... 🤬

🤍𝕁𝕆🤍

29,038 просмотров • 1 год назад

This accident was caused by the police officer in this video..the traffic light was showing yellow when he moved in to stop my car and when I match the break pad..the car behind me couldn’t respond faster and that was how the accident happened. So many accident like this has occurred..for god sake there is traffic light there and there was no need for an officer to interfere. If there traffic sign is broken..issue a ticket for breaking traffic laws.. Nigeria needs to fix a lot of things 📌
1:30

This accident was caused by the police officer in this video..the traffic light was showing yellow when he moved in to stop my car and when I match the break pad..the car behind me couldn’t respond faster and that was how the accident happened. So many accident like this has occurred..for god sake there is traffic light there and there was no need for an officer to interfere. If there traffic sign is broken..issue a ticket for breaking traffic laws.. Nigeria needs to fix a lot of things 📌

Aluya_pov

15,722 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I cannot believe what I’ve just heard WHAT?! I warn you now. This will make your blood boil. It’s infuriating. This ex-Met cop DEFENDS the police officer’s handling of the Henry Nowak case, even AFTER seeing the horrific bodycam footage. He told the police officer NINE times he couldn’t breathe, he told the officer FOUR times he had been stabbed and the officer believed the murderer and still said “I don’t think you have mate” after dragging his body across the gravel while he choked on his own blood. He says the police officer was “misled” and he “naturally assumed” - oh that’s okay then? And this guy is defending that. If that is the standard of policing we are to expect in the UK - if us or our loved ones are in a similar situation to Henry. We need to be VERY concerned. Patrick Christys is absolutely right when he said that officer should be charged criminally in my opinion! Well bloody said.
8:29

I cannot believe what I’ve just heard WHAT?! I warn you now. This will make your blood boil. It’s infuriating. This ex-Met cop DEFENDS the police officer’s handling of the Henry Nowak case, even AFTER seeing the horrific bodycam footage. He told the police officer NINE times he couldn’t breathe, he told the officer FOUR times he had been stabbed and the officer believed the murderer and still said “I don’t think you have mate” after dragging his body across the gravel while he choked on his own blood. He says the police officer was “misled” and he “naturally assumed” - oh that’s okay then? And this guy is defending that. If that is the standard of policing we are to expect in the UK - if us or our loved ones are in a similar situation to Henry. We need to be VERY concerned. Patrick Christys is absolutely right when he said that officer should be charged criminally in my opinion! Well bloody said.

Kosher

39,690 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyer: We asked the ICE officer what the reason for his detention was. The ICE officer didn't answer. We asked the ICE officer which detention center he would be taken to. The ICE officer said that they weren't able to say. We asked the ICE officer for a copy of any paperwork that's being served on him today. The ICE officer wouldn't commit to even giving us that paperwork
1:41

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyer: We asked the ICE officer what the reason for his detention was. The ICE officer didn't answer. We asked the ICE officer which detention center he would be taken to. The ICE officer said that they weren't able to say. We asked the ICE officer for a copy of any paperwork that's being served on him today. The ICE officer wouldn't commit to even giving us that paperwork

FactPost

136,665 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: Local police and ICE agents were filmed surrounding a Black man in Columbus, Ohio… despite openly admitting he had NO warrants. In the video, you can hear an officer ask: “So you have no warrants?” The man responds that they already KNOW he doesn’t… because he handed over all of his information. Then he asks: “Why did you pull me over?” An officer says, “You can’t have weed out in the car like that.” The man responds, “Weed’s not illegal. Are you all going to write me a ticket for weed?!?” And another officer ACTUALLY replies… “It’s frowned upon.” It’s frowned upon? Now yes… Ohio law does regulate how marijuana is transported in vehicles, similar to alcohol. If it’s open or improperly stored, officers can issue a citation. A CITATION. Not a situation where a man is pulled out of his car, and have multiple agencies run his information. Because if the issue was truly “improper storage,” then write the ticket and let him go. That’s how laws are supposed to work in a constitutional republic. Instead, what we’re watching is officers fishing for reasons to escalate AFTER already deciding this man was “suspicious.” The Fourth Amendment exists specifically to stop the government from detaining people without legitimate legal justification. And then you have the issue of ICE agents being involved… ICE is a federal immigration agency. They are not traffic police. They are not supposed to be part of routine traffic stops, especially when they involve U.S. citizens. That separation exists on purpose. Because when federal agencies start getting involved in traffic stops, it expands government power, fast. And once that happens, the line between enforcement and overreach gets blurred… and that’s when your constitutional rights start to disappear.
0:58

🚨BREAKING: Local police and ICE agents were filmed surrounding a Black man in Columbus, Ohio… despite openly admitting he had NO warrants. In the video, you can hear an officer ask: “So you have no warrants?” The man responds that they already KNOW he doesn’t… because he handed over all of his information. Then he asks: “Why did you pull me over?” An officer says, “You can’t have weed out in the car like that.” The man responds, “Weed’s not illegal. Are you all going to write me a ticket for weed?!?” And another officer ACTUALLY replies… “It’s frowned upon.” It’s frowned upon? Now yes… Ohio law does regulate how marijuana is transported in vehicles, similar to alcohol. If it’s open or improperly stored, officers can issue a citation. A CITATION. Not a situation where a man is pulled out of his car, and have multiple agencies run his information. Because if the issue was truly “improper storage,” then write the ticket and let him go. That’s how laws are supposed to work in a constitutional republic. Instead, what we’re watching is officers fishing for reasons to escalate AFTER already deciding this man was “suspicious.” The Fourth Amendment exists specifically to stop the government from detaining people without legitimate legal justification. And then you have the issue of ICE agents being involved… ICE is a federal immigration agency. They are not traffic police. They are not supposed to be part of routine traffic stops, especially when they involve U.S. citizens. That separation exists on purpose. Because when federal agencies start getting involved in traffic stops, it expands government power, fast. And once that happens, the line between enforcement and overreach gets blurred… and that’s when your constitutional rights start to disappear.

Jesus Freakin Congress

556,300 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This young man was handwashing his car since there was no line here. He does it all the time. The cars we see are for the automatic car wash. Anyways he already paid once and got water in the bucket so he could hand wash, after he did that he was preparing to put more money in so he could rinse. An employee comes up and takes the money out of his hand and pushes him and tells him to leave. Claiming Hess making others wait yet we see nobody there waiting. Would you have left too? The cops came and heard him out but since the employee wanted him to never come back, he was asked to respect that. I used to do this all the time especially when traveling. Sometimes I like doing it in the winter because of all the salt and such, I don’t want it damaging my paint. One time I decided to do this at about 2 in the morning on the way to the gym. Obviously there was nobody there and there is usually an officer parked in the parking lot because there used to be reports of people parking back there in the dark sleeping and doing other stuff. I was in the middle of my hand wash when a homeless man literally climbed from behind the dumpster nearby and asked why I was being noisy. I told him I was only washing my car and I was allowed to as it was a 24 hr spot and h paid after all. He started being unreasonable and I flagged the officer behind me, it took him about 30 seconds to notice and he pulled up and I explained what was going on. He said he figured that’s what I was doing since he often saw me doing it before. He did tell the homeless man to leave, and he did without incident. I was able to finish rinsing and drying my car and I left. I don’t live in a bad area, so I don’t feel unsafe doing this, have you ever had an issue washing the car at night? Night time is so much better, quieter and less busy.
1:58

This young man was handwashing his car since there was no line here. He does it all the time. The cars we see are for the automatic car wash. Anyways he already paid once and got water in the bucket so he could hand wash, after he did that he was preparing to put more money in so he could rinse. An employee comes up and takes the money out of his hand and pushes him and tells him to leave. Claiming Hess making others wait yet we see nobody there waiting. Would you have left too? The cops came and heard him out but since the employee wanted him to never come back, he was asked to respect that. I used to do this all the time especially when traveling. Sometimes I like doing it in the winter because of all the salt and such, I don’t want it damaging my paint. One time I decided to do this at about 2 in the morning on the way to the gym. Obviously there was nobody there and there is usually an officer parked in the parking lot because there used to be reports of people parking back there in the dark sleeping and doing other stuff. I was in the middle of my hand wash when a homeless man literally climbed from behind the dumpster nearby and asked why I was being noisy. I told him I was only washing my car and I was allowed to as it was a 24 hr spot and h paid after all. He started being unreasonable and I flagged the officer behind me, it took him about 30 seconds to notice and he pulled up and I explained what was going on. He said he figured that’s what I was doing since he often saw me doing it before. He did tell the homeless man to leave, and he did without incident. I was able to finish rinsing and drying my car and I left. I don’t live in a bad area, so I don’t feel unsafe doing this, have you ever had an issue washing the car at night? Night time is so much better, quieter and less busy.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

137,397 просмотров • 21 дней назад