Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This mom storms into court, dead set against cutting child support—even though dad's income dropped and he now has a new kid to support. Judge: 'You agree to the reduction?' Mom: 'No, I'm not.' She vents: He's slacking on father duties, has a new fiancée, blowing money on her...

end3of6days9's profile picture

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

124,078 subscribers

267,661 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Judge Juan Merchan has ordered Donald Trump to be sentenced for 34 counts on January 10th ahead of inauguration Judge Merchan was never supposed to oversee Donald Trump’s case, he was specifically assigned the case to weaponize our legal system against Trump, here’s the proof “Understand there's absolutely no reason that Judge Merchan should have even had a chance to be assigned to this case? Now, I'm sure the left is just gonna call this a conspiracy theory. ‌ So I'll issue a challenge to them, and maybe they can tell me how he managed to be the judge. Because for these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. ‌ That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. So even though they're trying to claim that they didn't pick the judge, that it was randomly assigned, that's not possible because judge Merchan isn't in the pool to be randomly assigned. So the only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. ‌ And the wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. ‌ So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats. ‌ But, yeah, I'm sure this was just a coincidence. It was a coincidence that one of the most high profile cases ever, we didn't assign a judge, we assigned an acting judge. ‌ And that that judge somehow got selected even though he wasn't in the pool of judges available to be selected, and that that same judge that was selected also caught 2 other Trump related cases in the same year, and then that judge's daughter makes tens of millions of dollars a year promoting Democrats. Yeah. I'm sure that's all a coincidence.”
1:53

Judge Juan Merchan has ordered Donald Trump to be sentenced for 34 counts on January 10th ahead of inauguration Judge Merchan was never supposed to oversee Donald Trump’s case, he was specifically assigned the case to weaponize our legal system against Trump, here’s the proof “Understand there's absolutely no reason that Judge Merchan should have even had a chance to be assigned to this case? Now, I'm sure the left is just gonna call this a conspiracy theory. ‌ So I'll issue a challenge to them, and maybe they can tell me how he managed to be the judge. Because for these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. ‌ That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. So even though they're trying to claim that they didn't pick the judge, that it was randomly assigned, that's not possible because judge Merchan isn't in the pool to be randomly assigned. So the only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. ‌ And the wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. ‌ So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats. ‌ But, yeah, I'm sure this was just a coincidence. It was a coincidence that one of the most high profile cases ever, we didn't assign a judge, we assigned an acting judge. ‌ And that that judge somehow got selected even though he wasn't in the pool of judges available to be selected, and that that same judge that was selected also caught 2 other Trump related cases in the same year, and then that judge's daughter makes tens of millions of dollars a year promoting Democrats. Yeah. I'm sure that's all a coincidence.”

Wall Street Apes

514,459 views • 1 year ago

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel “I'm calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant's Daughter's company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father's courtroom - I wanna know the bank records because money doesn't lie - I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction - Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“ That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.
0:56

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel “I'm calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant's Daughter's company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father's courtroom - I wanna know the bank records because money doesn't lie - I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction - Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“ That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.

Wall Street Apes

3,331,472 views • 1 year ago

Kenya is proud to formally launch the candidature of Judge Phoebe Okowa for a full term at the International Court of Justice (2027–2036). As the first African woman on the International Law Commission and now a Judge of the World Court, Judge Okowa is a trailblazer whose scholarship and practical expertise in international law have shaped global jurisprudence. Her re-election isn't just a win for Kenya; it is a commitment to a fair, diverse, and rules-based international order. We invite our partners in the diplomatic community to support this distinguished jurist as she continues to serve the cause of global justice. 🇰🇪⚖️ State Department for Foreign Affairs | Kenya #DiplomacyInActionKE
5:54

Kenya is proud to formally launch the candidature of Judge Phoebe Okowa for a full term at the International Court of Justice (2027–2036). As the first African woman on the International Law Commission and now a Judge of the World Court, Judge Okowa is a trailblazer whose scholarship and practical expertise in international law have shaped global jurisprudence. Her re-election isn't just a win for Kenya; it is a commitment to a fair, diverse, and rules-based international order. We invite our partners in the diplomatic community to support this distinguished jurist as she continues to serve the cause of global justice. 🇰🇪⚖️ State Department for Foreign Affairs | Kenya #DiplomacyInActionKE

Korir Sing'Oei

17,863 views • 6 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."
2:34

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

Press Trust of India

99,583 views • 4 months ago

Watch this judge go scorched the earth on defendant. He knew he was cooked at that point. As Judge Evans began delivering her findings, Thornton reached a breaking point, screaming “F*** you! I’m innocent!” directly at the bench. ​Judge Evans’ reaction became legendary. She didn't just have him removed; she delivered a blistering lecture on respect and the gravity of his actions. She made it clear: the courtroom belongs to the law, not the criminal by calling him back in to rip his behavior apart to his face. Keeping her cool the judge continues on with the verdict. Thornton was found guilty of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and unlawful imprisonment. Judge Evans sentenced him to 15 to 30 years in prison, ensuring he would no longer be a threat to the community.
1:31

Watch this judge go scorched the earth on defendant. He knew he was cooked at that point. As Judge Evans began delivering her findings, Thornton reached a breaking point, screaming “F*** you! I’m innocent!” directly at the bench. ​Judge Evans’ reaction became legendary. She didn't just have him removed; she delivered a blistering lecture on respect and the gravity of his actions. She made it clear: the courtroom belongs to the law, not the criminal by calling him back in to rip his behavior apart to his face. Keeping her cool the judge continues on with the verdict. Thornton was found guilty of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and unlawful imprisonment. Judge Evans sentenced him to 15 to 30 years in prison, ensuring he would no longer be a threat to the community.

Giggling Ganon

209,142 views • 3 months ago

NEW: California judge bans Kars4Kids ads from broadcasting in California, says the money was mostly going to a Jewish organization in New Jersey. Judge Gassia Apkarian alleged that the ads were misleading because they led the public “into believing donations aid underprivileged children in California.” “…the funds primarily support a separate organization benefiting specific families in New York, New Jersey, and abroad based on religious affiliation,” the judge said. Kars4Kids primarily funds Oorah, which spends money on various programs and initiatives including a $16.5 million purchase of a building in Israel, according to the New York Times. “We believe this decision is deeply flawed, ignores the facts and misapplies the law,” the organization said. “It’s well known that we are a Jewish organization and our website makes it abundantly clear.”
0:26

NEW: California judge bans Kars4Kids ads from broadcasting in California, says the money was mostly going to a Jewish organization in New Jersey. Judge Gassia Apkarian alleged that the ads were misleading because they led the public “into believing donations aid underprivileged children in California.” “…the funds primarily support a separate organization benefiting specific families in New York, New Jersey, and abroad based on religious affiliation,” the judge said. Kars4Kids primarily funds Oorah, which spends money on various programs and initiatives including a $16.5 million purchase of a building in Israel, according to the New York Times. “We believe this decision is deeply flawed, ignores the facts and misapplies the law,” the organization said. “It’s well known that we are a Jewish organization and our website makes it abundantly clear.”

Collin Rugg

1,784,631 views • 2 months ago

People are dragging this mom all over social media… but they’re missing the part that actually matters. She’s not speaking from politics — she’s speaking from experience. A single mom. A child in the hospital for a MONTH. And when she needed help the most? Nothing. No assistance. No safety net. No backup. So yeah… she has an opinion. And honestly? It didn’t come from a headline — it came from real life. Funny how quick people are to judge… until they’re the one sitting in that hospital room, exhausted, scared, and out of options. I’m on her side. What would YOU do in her situation? 👇
1:51

People are dragging this mom all over social media… but they’re missing the part that actually matters. She’s not speaking from politics — she’s speaking from experience. A single mom. A child in the hospital for a MONTH. And when she needed help the most? Nothing. No assistance. No safety net. No backup. So yeah… she has an opinion. And honestly? It didn’t come from a headline — it came from real life. Funny how quick people are to judge… until they’re the one sitting in that hospital room, exhausted, scared, and out of options. I’m on her side. What would YOU do in her situation? 👇

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

47,243 views • 3 months ago

JUST IN: Judge threatens to kick Donald Trump out of courtroom during E. Jean Carroll's defamation trial against him in New York. Trump reportedly taunted the judge in response by saying: "I would love it!" Judge: "Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive, which what has been reported to me consists of. And if he disregards court orders, Mr. Trump, I hope I don’t have to consider excluding you from the trial." Trump: *Throws hands up* Judge: "I understand you’re probably eager for me to do that." Trump: "I would love it!" The video below is Trump's deposition from 2022 where he told E. Jean Carroll’s lawyer to her face that she is not his type. 🔥
0:28

JUST IN: Judge threatens to kick Donald Trump out of courtroom during E. Jean Carroll's defamation trial against him in New York. Trump reportedly taunted the judge in response by saying: "I would love it!" Judge: "Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive, which what has been reported to me consists of. And if he disregards court orders, Mr. Trump, I hope I don’t have to consider excluding you from the trial." Trump: *Throws hands up* Judge: "I understand you’re probably eager for me to do that." Trump: "I would love it!" The video below is Trump's deposition from 2022 where he told E. Jean Carroll’s lawyer to her face that she is not his type. 🔥

Collin Rugg

5,571,528 views • 2 years ago

#JulianaPeresMagalhaes #BrendanBanfield #ChristineBanfield #JosephRyan 🚨 SENTENCED ‼️ Judge Penney S. Azcarate sentences Juliana Peres Magalhaes to the max 10 YEARS in prison for the death of Joseph Ryan. Judge says “You could have stopped this - the plan did not work without your involvement!” Judge Azcarate said “This is the most serious manslaughter scenario the court has ever seen.” “You brought a child into the basement knowing 2 people were going to be killed, including the child’s mother!” “You watched as Mr Banfield stabbed Mrs Banfield over and over again!” “You told a child it was ok to call you ‘mommy’ hours after the murders” Judge Azcarate finished by saying; “So let’s get this straight…. You DO NOT deserve anything other than a life of incarceration and reflection for what you have done to the victim and his family…. may it weigh heavily on your soul”. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
3:28

#JulianaPeresMagalhaes #BrendanBanfield #ChristineBanfield #JosephRyan 🚨 SENTENCED ‼️ Judge Penney S. Azcarate sentences Juliana Peres Magalhaes to the max 10 YEARS in prison for the death of Joseph Ryan. Judge says “You could have stopped this - the plan did not work without your involvement!” Judge Azcarate said “This is the most serious manslaughter scenario the court has ever seen.” “You brought a child into the basement knowing 2 people were going to be killed, including the child’s mother!” “You watched as Mr Banfield stabbed Mrs Banfield over and over again!” “You told a child it was ok to call you ‘mommy’ hours after the murders” Judge Azcarate finished by saying; “So let’s get this straight…. You DO NOT deserve anything other than a life of incarceration and reflection for what you have done to the victim and his family…. may it weigh heavily on your soul”. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼

Adriienne F

35,884 views • 5 months ago

Lindsey Graham didn’t just “go along” with the swamp; he is one of the major architects of it! In 2011, Graham voted YES to confirm Judge James Boasberg. Now look at what that decision has produced: - A federal judge who tried to go after Trump officials for carrying out deportation flights and enforcing our immigration law - A judge who was slapped down by an appeals court for overstepping his authority - A judge who blocked a grand jury investigation into Jerome Powell’s $2.5 BILLION Fed overspend This is the judiciary Lindsey Graham helped put in power. No accountability No law and order Not America First Lindsey Graham has consistently put judges in power who protect the status quo and punish anyone who challenges it. Graham had a choice, and he chose Boasberg. Americans are still living with the consequences.
4:18

Lindsey Graham didn’t just “go along” with the swamp; he is one of the major architects of it! In 2011, Graham voted YES to confirm Judge James Boasberg. Now look at what that decision has produced: - A federal judge who tried to go after Trump officials for carrying out deportation flights and enforcing our immigration law - A judge who was slapped down by an appeals court for overstepping his authority - A judge who blocked a grand jury investigation into Jerome Powell’s $2.5 BILLION Fed overspend This is the judiciary Lindsey Graham helped put in power. No accountability No law and order Not America First Lindsey Graham has consistently put judges in power who protect the status quo and punish anyone who challenges it. Graham had a choice, and he chose Boasberg. Americans are still living with the consequences.

Mark Lynch for U.S. Senate

54,365 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING: High Court Judge blocks Enoch Burke’s family from courtroom. Teacher Enoch Burke’s mother Martina and siblings Isaac and Ammi have stood by his side since May 2022 when the Principal of Wilson’s Hospital School demanded he use the “they” pronoun for a child in the school. Enoch Burke refused and was subsequently suspended in a flagrant breach of his constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience. Today he was forced to dial in by video link from Mountjoy Prison instead of attending in person a hearing before High Court Judge Brian Cregan. Before proceedings even began, and before anyone had spoken, Judge Cregan ordered Martina Burke, Isaac Burke and Ammi Burke to leave the room. The Burke family remained seated and reminded the Judge of their constitutional right to be present. Judge Cregan then rose, ordered the Gardaí to forcibly remove the Burkes, and left the courtroom. Open justice is a fundamental aspect of any functioning democracy. These are dark days in Irish courts. Judge Cregan then re-entered the courtroom and doubled down on his slander against Enoch Burke. The Judge restated that Enoch Burke was a “baleful and malign” presence in the school, “roaming” around the corridors of the school and “stalking the school, its teachers and pupils.” All of these statements are utterly false. Judge Cregan also reaffirmed that the pupils and teachers in the school had sworn affidavits against Enoch Burke. This is a blatant lie. Judge Brian Cregan has shown himself to be devoid of credibility. Three weeks ago Judge Cregan directed the Attorney General to bring criminal contempt proceedings against members of the Burke family. Judge Cregan had no right to do this, as the Judiciary and the Executive are separate powers. Last week, lawyers for the Attorney General appeared before Judge Cregan requesting that this direction would be withdrawn. They stated that it was inappropriate and wrong in law for Judge Cregan to instruct the Attorney General as to what to do in this regard. The direction was then withdrawn by the judge and changed to a request to “consider” bringing proceedings. Judge Cregan also continues to instruct Rosemary Mallon BL in these proceedings, despite the fact that her instructions should only be coming from her client, Wilson’s Hospital School. Rosemary Mallon willingly receives those instructions from the judge. Corrupt judges can disregard the Constitution and seek to strip upright citizens of their rights, but they will never succeed in removing God’s truth from society. Scripture says: “He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh” (Psalm 2:4). Truth will prevail.
7:48

BREAKING: High Court Judge blocks Enoch Burke’s family from courtroom. Teacher Enoch Burke’s mother Martina and siblings Isaac and Ammi have stood by his side since May 2022 when the Principal of Wilson’s Hospital School demanded he use the “they” pronoun for a child in the school. Enoch Burke refused and was subsequently suspended in a flagrant breach of his constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience. Today he was forced to dial in by video link from Mountjoy Prison instead of attending in person a hearing before High Court Judge Brian Cregan. Before proceedings even began, and before anyone had spoken, Judge Cregan ordered Martina Burke, Isaac Burke and Ammi Burke to leave the room. The Burke family remained seated and reminded the Judge of their constitutional right to be present. Judge Cregan then rose, ordered the Gardaí to forcibly remove the Burkes, and left the courtroom. Open justice is a fundamental aspect of any functioning democracy. These are dark days in Irish courts. Judge Cregan then re-entered the courtroom and doubled down on his slander against Enoch Burke. The Judge restated that Enoch Burke was a “baleful and malign” presence in the school, “roaming” around the corridors of the school and “stalking the school, its teachers and pupils.” All of these statements are utterly false. Judge Cregan also reaffirmed that the pupils and teachers in the school had sworn affidavits against Enoch Burke. This is a blatant lie. Judge Brian Cregan has shown himself to be devoid of credibility. Three weeks ago Judge Cregan directed the Attorney General to bring criminal contempt proceedings against members of the Burke family. Judge Cregan had no right to do this, as the Judiciary and the Executive are separate powers. Last week, lawyers for the Attorney General appeared before Judge Cregan requesting that this direction would be withdrawn. They stated that it was inappropriate and wrong in law for Judge Cregan to instruct the Attorney General as to what to do in this regard. The direction was then withdrawn by the judge and changed to a request to “consider” bringing proceedings. Judge Cregan also continues to instruct Rosemary Mallon BL in these proceedings, despite the fact that her instructions should only be coming from her client, Wilson’s Hospital School. Rosemary Mallon willingly receives those instructions from the judge. Corrupt judges can disregard the Constitution and seek to strip upright citizens of their rights, but they will never succeed in removing God’s truth from society. Scripture says: “He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh” (Psalm 2:4). Truth will prevail.

Enoch Burke

641,885 views • 7 months ago

You don't lie to the Judge. Watch this judge destroy the argument of the defendant as she calls out the blatant lies. Here are the case details. ​Mr. Schatowski, a man convicted of arson back in 2014, finally had his day in court for a restitution hearing. Despite owing his victims over $481,000, he hasn’t paid a single cent since his release in 2023. ​The drama peaked when his sister, Naomi, took the stand to claim he’s broke and unemployed. The problem? She previously signed a document stating he pays her $500 a month in rent. ​The judge wasn't having it, accusing her of lying to the court and threatening her with contempt. Since they "proved" he could afford $500 for rent, the judge ordered him to pay $500 a month to his victims—double what the state even asked for. The judge ended by saying he will be in jail if he does not pay.
2:30

You don't lie to the Judge. Watch this judge destroy the argument of the defendant as she calls out the blatant lies. Here are the case details. ​Mr. Schatowski, a man convicted of arson back in 2014, finally had his day in court for a restitution hearing. Despite owing his victims over $481,000, he hasn’t paid a single cent since his release in 2023. ​The drama peaked when his sister, Naomi, took the stand to claim he’s broke and unemployed. The problem? She previously signed a document stating he pays her $500 a month in rent. ​The judge wasn't having it, accusing her of lying to the court and threatening her with contempt. Since they "proved" he could afford $500 for rent, the judge ordered him to pay $500 a month to his victims—double what the state even asked for. The judge ended by saying he will be in jail if he does not pay.

Giggling Ganon

64,973 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | New York, US: US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis' order asking DOJ to justify dropping charges against Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani | "In theory, yes. In practice, that essentially never happens, because the judge is really just trying to make sure that there's no funny business going on here, and it's extremely rare for a judge to refuse to dismiss a case, and as a practical matter, even if a judge did refuse to dismiss a case under rule 48, the government could essentially get a dismissal anyway by just not prosecuting the case, not bringing it to trial, not doing the things that it needed to do, and then the case would just get dismissed just later in time..." says Benjamin A. Gianforti, a US based lawyer Partner in the firm’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution Group when asked can Judge Garaufis refuse DOJ’s request to drop a case
1:05

#WATCH | New York, US: US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis' order asking DOJ to justify dropping charges against Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani | "In theory, yes. In practice, that essentially never happens, because the judge is really just trying to make sure that there's no funny business going on here, and it's extremely rare for a judge to refuse to dismiss a case, and as a practical matter, even if a judge did refuse to dismiss a case under rule 48, the government could essentially get a dismissal anyway by just not prosecuting the case, not bringing it to trial, not doing the things that it needed to do, and then the case would just get dismissed just later in time..." says Benjamin A. Gianforti, a US based lawyer Partner in the firm’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution Group when asked can Judge Garaufis refuse DOJ’s request to drop a case

ANI

40,439 views • 1 month ago

You know it's crazy when even judge Isenhower has no idea why the person is in jail. Judge Daryl Isenhower expresses confusion as to why Mr. Butler is even in his courtroom. The judge states there are only two ways to end up in jail and in court like this and it's either due to a signed warrant or if the person commited a crime. This guy has neither. This is what the judge laid out. ​Lack of Legal Grounds: The judge notes that the Florida Highway Patrol brought Mr. Butler to jail, but there was no formal criminal complaint filed against him. ​Missing Warrant: While there was a "teletype" from authorities in Calhoun County indicating they intended to seek a warrant for a vehicle theft and pursuit, no such warrant had actually been signed by a judge. ​The Judge's Ruling: Judge Isenhower explains that there are only two legal ways to hold someone: a signed warrant or probable cause laid out in a sworn complaint. Since neither existed, he ordered Mr. Butler’s immediate release from jail, stating, "It should have never happened this way."
2:17

You know it's crazy when even judge Isenhower has no idea why the person is in jail. Judge Daryl Isenhower expresses confusion as to why Mr. Butler is even in his courtroom. The judge states there are only two ways to end up in jail and in court like this and it's either due to a signed warrant or if the person commited a crime. This guy has neither. This is what the judge laid out. ​Lack of Legal Grounds: The judge notes that the Florida Highway Patrol brought Mr. Butler to jail, but there was no formal criminal complaint filed against him. ​Missing Warrant: While there was a "teletype" from authorities in Calhoun County indicating they intended to seek a warrant for a vehicle theft and pursuit, no such warrant had actually been signed by a judge. ​The Judge's Ruling: Judge Isenhower explains that there are only two legal ways to hold someone: a signed warrant or probable cause laid out in a sworn complaint. Since neither existed, he ordered Mr. Butler’s immediate release from jail, stating, "It should have never happened this way."

Giggling Ganon

270,518 views • 2 months ago

🚨WHAT THE HELL?!!! A California judge let a CONVICTED CHILD MOL*STER walk out of his courtroom... ...after a jury convicted him on SIX FELONY COUNTS of se*ually abusing an 11-year-old girl. He has now been on the RUN FOR 9 MONTHS!!! The DA begged the judge not let him out, but did it anyway. Carl Cacconie was facing 18 years in prison, but instead, Judge McLaughlin let him post bail and walk out with a GPS ankle monitor. 10 days later, the ankle monitor mysteriously "lost connection" and when probation finally called him, Cacconie told them he was "charging the anklet." THEY BELIEVED HIM. He skipped sentencing and now a convicted child mol*ster is FREE because ONE California judge refused to take him into custody. WHAT ARE WE DOING?!!!!!!!!
4:00

🚨WHAT THE HELL?!!! A California judge let a CONVICTED CHILD MOL*STER walk out of his courtroom... ...after a jury convicted him on SIX FELONY COUNTS of se*ually abusing an 11-year-old girl. He has now been on the RUN FOR 9 MONTHS!!! The DA begged the judge not let him out, but did it anyway. Carl Cacconie was facing 18 years in prison, but instead, Judge McLaughlin let him post bail and walk out with a GPS ankle monitor. 10 days later, the ankle monitor mysteriously "lost connection" and when probation finally called him, Cacconie told them he was "charging the anklet." THEY BELIEVED HIM. He skipped sentencing and now a convicted child mol*ster is FREE because ONE California judge refused to take him into custody. WHAT ARE WE DOING?!!!!!!!!

Matt Van Swol

394,052 views • 2 months ago

An FIR for abetment of suicide has been registered at Safdarjung Enclave Police Station under section 108/61(2)BNS against the wife Swati who is also a Judge and her IAS sister Nidhi Malik in the suicide case of Karkardooma Court Judge Aman Kumar Sharma. But it seems more like a planned murder than a suicide as per the statement of Adv Prem Kumar Sharma, Father of Judge Aman Kumar Sharma. IAS Nidhi Malik is a 2013 Batch IAS officer who is posted in Jammu at Present. She is married to 2012 Batch IPS Officer Devesh Kumar Mahla who was posted as DCP at New Delhi District of Delhi Police and is currently posted as Director, FSSAI with Central Government. It is speculated that even Nidhi Malik is not having a harmonious relationship with her husband. We are waiting to see that how Delhi Police will handle this case with the names of Judge, IAS and even IPS connected with the case now.
16:56

An FIR for abetment of suicide has been registered at Safdarjung Enclave Police Station under section 108/61(2)BNS against the wife Swati who is also a Judge and her IAS sister Nidhi Malik in the suicide case of Karkardooma Court Judge Aman Kumar Sharma. But it seems more like a planned murder than a suicide as per the statement of Adv Prem Kumar Sharma, Father of Judge Aman Kumar Sharma. IAS Nidhi Malik is a 2013 Batch IAS officer who is posted in Jammu at Present. She is married to 2012 Batch IPS Officer Devesh Kumar Mahla who was posted as DCP at New Delhi District of Delhi Police and is currently posted as Director, FSSAI with Central Government. It is speculated that even Nidhi Malik is not having a harmonious relationship with her husband. We are waiting to see that how Delhi Police will handle this case with the names of Judge, IAS and even IPS connected with the case now.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

59,950 views • 2 months ago

Allen Inverson says he earned $200,000,00 told a judge in court I don’t even have money for a cheeseburger his wife handed him $61 cash on the spot ‘The most awkward feeling is I don’t want to be shining and looking good and my homeboys not, so when I go to the jewelry store they going to the jewelry store’ ‘When I get cars they get cars I ain’t have the word no in my vocabulary when it come to people, I traveled with an entourage of 50 people paid everyone’s rent,cars,jewelry and bail bonds’ ‘In 2012 in the courtroom about to divorce my wife I wold the judge I don’t even have money for a cheeseburger and my wife Tawanna reached into her purse and handed me $61 cash’
1:23

Allen Inverson says he earned $200,000,00 told a judge in court I don’t even have money for a cheeseburger his wife handed him $61 cash on the spot ‘The most awkward feeling is I don’t want to be shining and looking good and my homeboys not, so when I go to the jewelry store they going to the jewelry store’ ‘When I get cars they get cars I ain’t have the word no in my vocabulary when it come to people, I traveled with an entourage of 50 people paid everyone’s rent,cars,jewelry and bail bonds’ ‘In 2012 in the courtroom about to divorce my wife I wold the judge I don’t even have money for a cheeseburger and my wife Tawanna reached into her purse and handed me $61 cash’

zaza

1,523,190 views • 23 days ago

This is insane So it turns out Donald Trump didn’t order an end to the temporary protected status of the 350,000 Haitians The executive order was made by Biden and was just expiring, but a Federal Judge decided it’s not allowed to expire “This is starting to border on insanity. So Biden administration put in a temporary protection order for 350,000 Haitians. It was done through executive order, so there was no vote, there was no law, there was no legislation. It was just the Biden administration saying, I wanna give these people temporary protected status, which he's allowed to do. Now, when Trump came in office, he could have created an executive order and got rid of it, but he said, I'm not even gonna do that. I'm just gonna let it expire. Like, this is not the Trump administration doing anything. They are just letting the policy from Biden expire when it was supposed to. However, a Washington DC based federal judge, Ana Reyes, who is a Biden appointee, has blocked the Department of Homeland Security from ending temporary protected status, which is, I hate the way that's worded because that's not what they did. No, the Trump administration isn't ending their protected status. They're simply letting the executive order from the Biden administration expire when it was supposed to. And now you have a judge who basically says, You don't get to do that. You don't get to let executive orders expire. That is f*cking insane. This isn't a law. This isn't legislation. Nobody voted on this. This was just the Biden administration saying, I want to temporarily protect these 350,000 Haitians. And Trump saying, okay, I'm gonna let that status expire and they can be deported. And a judge who has no purview in this whatsoever was just like, No, I'm gonna set immigration legislation. I'm gonna set policy….. She doesn't get to do that.”
1:31

This is insane So it turns out Donald Trump didn’t order an end to the temporary protected status of the 350,000 Haitians The executive order was made by Biden and was just expiring, but a Federal Judge decided it’s not allowed to expire “This is starting to border on insanity. So Biden administration put in a temporary protection order for 350,000 Haitians. It was done through executive order, so there was no vote, there was no law, there was no legislation. It was just the Biden administration saying, I wanna give these people temporary protected status, which he's allowed to do. Now, when Trump came in office, he could have created an executive order and got rid of it, but he said, I'm not even gonna do that. I'm just gonna let it expire. Like, this is not the Trump administration doing anything. They are just letting the policy from Biden expire when it was supposed to. However, a Washington DC based federal judge, Ana Reyes, who is a Biden appointee, has blocked the Department of Homeland Security from ending temporary protected status, which is, I hate the way that's worded because that's not what they did. No, the Trump administration isn't ending their protected status. They're simply letting the executive order from the Biden administration expire when it was supposed to. And now you have a judge who basically says, You don't get to do that. You don't get to let executive orders expire. That is f*cking insane. This isn't a law. This isn't legislation. Nobody voted on this. This was just the Biden administration saying, I want to temporarily protect these 350,000 Haitians. And Trump saying, okay, I'm gonna let that status expire and they can be deported. And a judge who has no purview in this whatsoever was just like, No, I'm gonna set immigration legislation. I'm gonna set policy….. She doesn't get to do that.”

Wall Street Apes

994,438 views • 5 months ago

Despite stating that “only medical doctors” are qualified & can testify as to the medical causation of an injury on June 18, 2024, Judge Cannone just ruled that Mr. Crosby can testify to the medical causation of an injury even though he’s not a medical doctor, he’s not a forensic odontologist or veterinarian, and he has no medical training or experience. Apparently, the Court’s rules, case law, and the rules of criminal procedure don’t apply to the prosecution, but are applied with the highest, strictest, most unreasonable and impossible to meet standards to the defense. In Judge Bev’s court, Karen Read’s defense team has the burden of proof! Even though criminal defendants are presumed innocent, if you don’t have at least $5 million dollars to throw away, you’re f*cked! And if you do, you’re still f*cked! Especially in Judge Beverly Cannone’s court. Is Judge Beverly Cannone unwell? I’ve truly not seen such a nonsensical decision that’s so obviously in direct contradiction with the Court’s own stated ruling on qualifying medical causation experts. In her decision, Judge Cannone states: “The defendant's objection goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility.” Either Judge Cannone is lying or she doesn’t read the defense’s moving papers and affidavits, because the defense laid out a 15-page Motion, and 6-page Affidavit from its already qualified expert Dr. Marie Russell, detailing how Mr. Crosby is unqualified to offer medical causation testimony under the Daubert Lanigan standard. The Daubert Lanigan standard has everything to do with the admissibility of evidence, or expert testimony, and nothing to do with “the weight of the evidence.” But I thought Judge Cannone knew that? Her decision today suggests otherwise. Foundationally, it is undisputed that Mr. Crosby is not a medical doctor. He thus fails per se the “crucial” qualifications inquiry of the Daubert-Lanigan standard; this failure is not curable. On this basis alone his testimony must be excluded as he fails to meet the first, and crucial, prong of the Daubert-Lanigan standard for the reason expressed in the Court’s June 18th ruling during the first trial. In addition, the methodology that Crosby proffered is not generally accepted in the relevant medical community and is otherwise unreliable. But, who cares about the law, or Judge Bev’s candor to the court, right? Apparently in Massachusetts, candor to the court doesn’t apply to judges and they’re permitted to make amorphous, ever-evolving, fluid statements and rulings not based in the law, but rather subjectively and selectively applied to benefit one side. If ever you needed proof to show you just how unfit this Judge is to preside over this case—because her emotions and bias so overwhelm her ability to make fair, impartial rulings rooted in the law, literally causing her to defy her own standard previously stated in this courtroom on the record—well, here it is. If the Judge’s own standard is selectively enforced to ALWAYS prejudice the defendant and benefit the Commonwealth, then why do we even have standards to begin with? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead
0:35

Despite stating that “only medical doctors” are qualified & can testify as to the medical causation of an injury on June 18, 2024, Judge Cannone just ruled that Mr. Crosby can testify to the medical causation of an injury even though he’s not a medical doctor, he’s not a forensic odontologist or veterinarian, and he has no medical training or experience. Apparently, the Court’s rules, case law, and the rules of criminal procedure don’t apply to the prosecution, but are applied with the highest, strictest, most unreasonable and impossible to meet standards to the defense. In Judge Bev’s court, Karen Read’s defense team has the burden of proof! Even though criminal defendants are presumed innocent, if you don’t have at least $5 million dollars to throw away, you’re f*cked! And if you do, you’re still f*cked! Especially in Judge Beverly Cannone’s court. Is Judge Beverly Cannone unwell? I’ve truly not seen such a nonsensical decision that’s so obviously in direct contradiction with the Court’s own stated ruling on qualifying medical causation experts. In her decision, Judge Cannone states: “The defendant's objection goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility.” Either Judge Cannone is lying or she doesn’t read the defense’s moving papers and affidavits, because the defense laid out a 15-page Motion, and 6-page Affidavit from its already qualified expert Dr. Marie Russell, detailing how Mr. Crosby is unqualified to offer medical causation testimony under the Daubert Lanigan standard. The Daubert Lanigan standard has everything to do with the admissibility of evidence, or expert testimony, and nothing to do with “the weight of the evidence.” But I thought Judge Cannone knew that? Her decision today suggests otherwise. Foundationally, it is undisputed that Mr. Crosby is not a medical doctor. He thus fails per se the “crucial” qualifications inquiry of the Daubert-Lanigan standard; this failure is not curable. On this basis alone his testimony must be excluded as he fails to meet the first, and crucial, prong of the Daubert-Lanigan standard for the reason expressed in the Court’s June 18th ruling during the first trial. In addition, the methodology that Crosby proffered is not generally accepted in the relevant medical community and is otherwise unreliable. But, who cares about the law, or Judge Bev’s candor to the court, right? Apparently in Massachusetts, candor to the court doesn’t apply to judges and they’re permitted to make amorphous, ever-evolving, fluid statements and rulings not based in the law, but rather subjectively and selectively applied to benefit one side. If ever you needed proof to show you just how unfit this Judge is to preside over this case—because her emotions and bias so overwhelm her ability to make fair, impartial rulings rooted in the law, literally causing her to defy her own standard previously stated in this courtroom on the record—well, here it is. If the Judge’s own standard is selectively enforced to ALWAYS prejudice the defendant and benefit the Commonwealth, then why do we even have standards to begin with? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead

Olivia

85,088 views • 1 year ago