正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This morning’s grandstanding at Quantico only solidified what we already know: Pete Hegseth continues to disparage and lie about women in the military. He claimed the military needs to “return to the male standard” in combat jobs (of 1990!), but here’s the truth: there has never been a separate... show more

Amy McGrath

445,067 subscribers

877,638 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Years after women have entered combat jobs following generations of restrictions, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has directed every combat job to return “to the highest male standard.”

Years after women have entered combat jobs following generations of restrictions, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has directed every combat job to return “to the highest male standard.”

The Washington Post

78,946 次观看 • 9 个月前

.Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announces new directives to ensure that every military Combat MOS and Combat Arms position will return "to the highest male standard only — because this job is life or death." "Standards must be met... it's common sense and core to who we are and what we do."

.Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announces new directives to ensure that every military Combat MOS and Combat Arms position will return "to the highest male standard only — because this job is life or death." "Standards must be met... it's common sense and core to who we are and what we do."

Rapid Response 47

5,747,671 次观看 • 9 个月前

Pete Hegseth on Having ‘Gender Equality’ in U.S. Military Combat Roles “My stance has been the standards need to be universally high, and I mean at the male standard high. If that excludes females, then so be it. That's not the intent, but it could be the effect. And that's okay.”

Pete Hegseth on Having ‘Gender Equality’ in U.S. Military Combat Roles “My stance has been the standards need to be universally high, and I mean at the male standard high. If that excludes females, then so be it. That's not the intent, but it could be the effect. And that's okay.”

Chief Nerd

514,399 次观看 • 7 个月前

Sen. Duckworth called Pete Hegseth an “incompetent fool,” a “misogynist,” and accused him of a “personal vendetta” against women in the military. Here’s the reality she omitted: Hegseth wants combat roles held to the highest male standard because these are life or death jobs where physical capability keeps troops alive. Duckworth even admits physical fitness standards already differ by both age and gender. Yet she pretends enforcing peak performance for combat is anti-woman. This is the left choosing ideology over military effectiveness.

Sen. Duckworth called Pete Hegseth an “incompetent fool,” a “misogynist,” and accused him of a “personal vendetta” against women in the military. Here’s the reality she omitted: Hegseth wants combat roles held to the highest male standard because these are life or death jobs where physical capability keeps troops alive. Duckworth even admits physical fitness standards already differ by both age and gender. Yet she pretends enforcing peak performance for combat is anti-woman. This is the left choosing ideology over military effectiveness.

Media Lies

44,026 次观看 • 2 个月前

I asked Pete Hegseth if he's laying the groundwork to reverse the policy on women in combat. He didn't say no, then began rambling about "the highest male standard." His overt misogyny is an insult to the sacrifice of the MILLIONS of women who serve and have served our country.

I asked Pete Hegseth if he's laying the groundwork to reverse the policy on women in combat. He didn't say no, then began rambling about "the highest male standard." His overt misogyny is an insult to the sacrifice of the MILLIONS of women who serve and have served our country.

Senator Mazie Hirono

98,080 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨Mark “White Rage” Milley really wants your daughters to fight in military combat: “Don’t lecture me about women in combat. Women have been in combat and it doesn’t matter if that 762 hits you in the chest, no one gives a sh*t if it's a woman or guy who pulled the trigger. If you meet the standards, our military must be and always should be a standard-based merit-based military, period, full stop. Doesn't matter if you are white, black, a man, a woman, Catholic, Protestant . What matters are standards, readiness standards. Do you meet the standard or not. If yes, pass go, collect 200, join the infantry.”

🚨Mark “White Rage” Milley really wants your daughters to fight in military combat: “Don’t lecture me about women in combat. Women have been in combat and it doesn’t matter if that 762 hits you in the chest, no one gives a sh*t if it's a woman or guy who pulled the trigger. If you meet the standards, our military must be and always should be a standard-based merit-based military, period, full stop. Doesn't matter if you are white, black, a man, a woman, Catholic, Protestant . What matters are standards, readiness standards. Do you meet the standard or not. If yes, pass go, collect 200, join the infantry.”

Steve Cortes

3,162,792 次观看 • 1 年前

A lot of us believed Pete Hegseth hated women even before he was confirmed. We weren’t wrong. Quotes on women in the military: • In a 2024 interview, Hegseth stated that "Women shouldn't be in combat at all. They're life-givers, not life-takers". • He has also called for only applying "male physical standards for combat jobs". 1/2

A lot of us believed Pete Hegseth hated women even before he was confirmed. We weren’t wrong. Quotes on women in the military: • In a 2024 interview, Hegseth stated that "Women shouldn't be in combat at all. They're life-givers, not life-takers". • He has also called for only applying "male physical standards for combat jobs". 1/2

Christopher Webb

173,926 次观看 • 9 个月前

It’s fine to set standards however you want. That’s not the issue. What’s false is Hegseth’s continued narrative that combat standards were somehow lowered for women. They were not. And for the SecDef to lie about that is a slap in the face to all women who have served in combat roles. Thanks to @TheWeekendMSNBC for having me on this morning.

It’s fine to set standards however you want. That’s not the issue. What’s false is Hegseth’s continued narrative that combat standards were somehow lowered for women. They were not. And for the SecDef to lie about that is a slap in the face to all women who have served in combat roles. Thanks to @TheWeekendMSNBC for having me on this morning.

Amy McGrath

289,797 次观看 • 9 个月前

Misconstrued? Pete Hegseth has been crystal clear: he doesn't think women in the military belong in combat and now he's trying to cover up his dangerous views.

Misconstrued? Pete Hegseth has been crystal clear: he doesn't think women in the military belong in combat and now he's trying to cover up his dangerous views.

Elizabeth Warren

103,258 次观看 • 1 年前

Thousands of women have served in combat, with honor and distinction, and at levels that Pete Hegseth himself has not reached. Having personally served for twenty-four years, in combat for three separate tours, I take great offense at his indefensible position. It’s shameful to suggest that women can not do jobs that we’ve already done. #womenincombat

Thousands of women have served in combat, with honor and distinction, and at levels that Pete Hegseth himself has not reached. Having personally served for twenty-four years, in combat for three separate tours, I take great offense at his indefensible position. It’s shameful to suggest that women can not do jobs that we’ve already done. #womenincombat

Amy McGrath

221,002 次观看 • 1 年前

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand yells at Hegseth for statements about not wanting to have women serve in combat roles: "We have hundreds – HUNDREDS of women who are currently in the infantry...You degrade them. You say, we need moms but not in the military, especially in combat units.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand yells at Hegseth for statements about not wanting to have women serve in combat roles: "We have hundreds – HUNDREDS of women who are currently in the infantry...You degrade them. You say, we need moms but not in the military, especially in combat units.

Julio Rosas

611,358 次观看 • 1 年前

Combat isn’t the place for social experiments. Lowering standards puts lives at risk—and that’s beyond dangerous. It’s cruel. Tim Kennedy, former UFC fighter & Green Beret: “If you’re in combat arms, there’s one standard—you can do the job or you can’t. This is not the place to play games.”

Combat isn’t the place for social experiments. Lowering standards puts lives at risk—and that’s beyond dangerous. It’s cruel. Tim Kennedy, former UFC fighter & Green Beret: “If you’re in combat arms, there’s one standard—you can do the job or you can’t. This is not the place to play games.”

Laura Ingraham

99,528 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨ICYMI: Hosted Rob Finnerty and touched on the controversial topic: women fighting in ground combat. The Marine Corps conducted a nine-month study to assess the feasibility of women serving in infantry roles. Upon completion, the study concluded that integrating women into infantry units was a "lethal mistake", as it significantly compromised combat readiness. Despite this, President Obama and his Secretary of the Navy chose to ignore the findings, dismissing the overwhelming evidence of its negative impact. Women cannot physically match men in hand-to-hand combat and claims that "many men can't do the job either" are not a valid justification. This argument sets a dangerously low standard for what is required. Regardless of training, women will not achieve the same muscle mass or lung capacity as men, and their lack of testosterone makes them more vulnerable to injuries. Advocates for placing women in combat roles are effectively setting them up for higher injury rates and even death, leading to shorter military careers and long term disability.

🚨ICYMI: Hosted Rob Finnerty and touched on the controversial topic: women fighting in ground combat. The Marine Corps conducted a nine-month study to assess the feasibility of women serving in infantry roles. Upon completion, the study concluded that integrating women into infantry units was a "lethal mistake", as it significantly compromised combat readiness. Despite this, President Obama and his Secretary of the Navy chose to ignore the findings, dismissing the overwhelming evidence of its negative impact. Women cannot physically match men in hand-to-hand combat and claims that "many men can't do the job either" are not a valid justification. This argument sets a dangerously low standard for what is required. Regardless of training, women will not achieve the same muscle mass or lung capacity as men, and their lack of testosterone makes them more vulnerable to injuries. Advocates for placing women in combat roles are effectively setting them up for higher injury rates and even death, leading to shorter military careers and long term disability.

Gunnery Sergeant Jessie Jane Duff

60,301 次观看 • 1 年前

Earlier this week, I released an exclusive report about how Army Secretary Dan Driscoll Secretary of the Army has been aggressively working to undermine Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in an effort to steal his job. My report has since gone viral, and high level sources at Department of War 🇺🇸 tell me it is the talk of the town at the Pentagon this week. Source: .Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth recently went on The Katie Miller Podcast and talked about the differences between men and women in combat. He said, “My stance has been the standards need to be universally high, and I mean at the male standard high. If that excludes females, then so be it. That's not the intent, but it could be the effect. And that's okay.” That’s not what Army Secretary Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll recently said. Driscoll told Politico’s Dasha Burns in a recent interview there is “no difference” between men and women in combat because he “couldn’t tell the difference between the men and women” at a Ranger school training. Wow. The Army Secretary is pushing woke gender nonsense while Hegseth is trying to create elite, super warriors who can defend our nation from our enemies. I really hope we never see a day where Dan Driscoll replaces Pete Hegseth, or else we’re going to have a bunch of feminists on the battlefield and our nation will be captured. That’s the ultimate fantasy of Driscoll’s best buddy Jake Sullivan Jake Sullivan.

Earlier this week, I released an exclusive report about how Army Secretary Dan Driscoll Secretary of the Army has been aggressively working to undermine Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in an effort to steal his job. My report has since gone viral, and high level sources at Department of War 🇺🇸 tell me it is the talk of the town at the Pentagon this week. Source: .Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth recently went on The Katie Miller Podcast and talked about the differences between men and women in combat. He said, “My stance has been the standards need to be universally high, and I mean at the male standard high. If that excludes females, then so be it. That's not the intent, but it could be the effect. And that's okay.” That’s not what Army Secretary Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll recently said. Driscoll told Politico’s Dasha Burns in a recent interview there is “no difference” between men and women in combat because he “couldn’t tell the difference between the men and women” at a Ranger school training. Wow. The Army Secretary is pushing woke gender nonsense while Hegseth is trying to create elite, super warriors who can defend our nation from our enemies. I really hope we never see a day where Dan Driscoll replaces Pete Hegseth, or else we’re going to have a bunch of feminists on the battlefield and our nation will be captured. That’s the ultimate fantasy of Driscoll’s best buddy Jake Sullivan Jake Sullivan.

Laura Loomer

361,631 次观看 • 7 个月前

Women make up nearly one in five members of our military - serving on the frontlines. But Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, doesn’t believe women in the military should serve in combat roles. That's a national security risk.

Women make up nearly one in five members of our military - serving on the frontlines. But Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, doesn’t believe women in the military should serve in combat roles. That's a national security risk.

Elizabeth Warren

293,378 次观看 • 1 年前

These women are the most powerful and skilled female fighter pilots in the Air-force! Imagine Pete Hegseth trying to do what they do,but he thinks women aren’t capable of being in the Military! 🤬

These women are the most powerful and skilled female fighter pilots in the Air-force! Imagine Pete Hegseth trying to do what they do,but he thinks women aren’t capable of being in the Military! 🤬

Suzie rizzio

771,678 次观看 • 9 个月前

OMG this guy who is a member of the Military says that he can’t be deployed to Iran and the reason he can’t is disturbing and disgusting and he needs to be reported! This man sounds like a threat to women in & out of the Military! What do you think! 🤬

OMG this guy who is a member of the Military says that he can’t be deployed to Iran and the reason he can’t is disturbing and disgusting and he needs to be reported! This man sounds like a threat to women in & out of the Military! What do you think! 🤬

Suzie rizzio

167,989 次观看 • 4 个月前