Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
this narrative that the Celtics are "better without Tatum" is absolutely crazy. "can they win games without Tatum? absolutely. they're a deep team. that doesn't make them better without him (...) his absence simply makes other guys HAVE to step up." CBS Sports
27,777 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

@CBSSports She a 10 but she a Knicks fan 😍😒👎🏾

@CBSSports I agree but is this a shot at @EmmanuelAcho ?

@CBSSports who?

@CBSSports Great observation and that's fair. Thibs has to gameplan for a different team. Celtics play without guys all year this isn't anything new to them. If they get ANYTHING from KP its going back to Boston. Keep attacking Brunson old school style. Celtics on 7. ☘️☘️

@CBSSports Hope they eventually lose him if this narrative keeps up. He just went down with an injury and this is how people are talking. Just nefarious work

@CBSSports And i get bashed for saying this at times

@CBSSports They are better without JT if they come back and win that series and he's not playing then that will be the narrative

@CBSSports 💯!!! Emmanuel Acho started that BS, no one with any hoop knowledge with even fathom that , the Cs are serious contenders with Tatum, without him they’re not! That’s like saying Goodfellas would be better without Ray Liotta because now Joe Pesci can shine more

@CBSSports Jason Tatum, Celtics hate ‘em, you can quote me verbatim….your Knicks in 6 Ash

@CBSSports Team basketball 🏀 is better give me 3 dudes hitting like 20 + to your 1 hitting 35 kinda makes sense to me.
Related Videos
Are the Celtics a better team without Tatum? Pardon My Take
Barstool Sports
187,572 views • 1 year ago



!["Are [the Boston Celtics] a contender without Jayson Tatum? No. Are they are a really good playoff team? Without question." Kenny Smith thinks the Celtics are worth the hype 🙌](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2009047489874178053/media/G-GSCxwWAAAYUb9.jpg)

