Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🔞 This NSFW video is for mature audiences only. 🔞 Expect explicit content, filthy dialogue, and saucy humour. 🔞 For those who prefer their mature women bold, busty, and completely indifferent to HR guidelines... Lydia Foxworth delivers another outrageous GILF tease. #GILF #NSFW #EroticComedy #LydiaFoxworth

61,493 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

FAKE FEMINISTS: Women's org celebrates man for International Women's Day You know, Canada used to produce real feminists. Women who actually fought for women. Women who risked their reputations, their safety, and sometimes even their freedom to win basic rights that seem obvious today. One of the most prominent examples of that fight happened right here in Canada with a group known as the “Famous Five.” In the 1920s, Emily Murphy, Nellie McClung, Henrietta Edwards, Louise McKinney and Irene Parlby took on the Canadian government over a simple but outrageous question: Were women legally considered “persons”? Yes. That was the actual legal question. At the time, women could not sit in the Senate because the law only allowed “qualified persons.” And according to the courts, that word did not include women. So, the Famous Five challenged the system. They fought their case all the way to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain and in 1929 they won the historic Persons Case, which affirmed that women were indeed persons under the law. It was a foundational victory for women’s political rights in Canada. Their legacy is supposed to be about defending women as a distinct class with their own rights and interests. Which makes what just happened in Ottawa so astonishing. Because the Famous Five Foundation — the organization that claims to carry on the legacy of those women — has decided to honour a biological man. Not just any man. A man who has openly advocated for silencing women who defend women-only spaces. His name is Fae Johnstone, a prominent activist in Canada’s trans lobby. Through organizations like Queer Momentum and Wisdom2Action, groups that together receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in public and institutional funding, he has built a professional advocacy career pushing gender ideology into Canadian institutions and fighting against parents' rights. That advocacy often comes with a very clear message to women: fall in line or be shut up — or worse. Women who question whether female-only spaces, sports, shelters or prisons should remain female-only are routinely labelled hateful, bigoted or dangerous by activists in this movement and by Johnstone more specifically. In other words, women who try to defend the very rights that the Famous Five fought to establish are treated like enemies. And yet, somehow, the Famous Five Foundation in Ottawa decided this was the person worthy of recognition as part of International Women's Day. Think about the absurdity of that for a moment. The women who fought to have women recognized as persons are now being invoked to celebrate a man who believes womanhood is simply a matter of personal identification. A movement that once fought to define women as a legal and biological reality is now apparently comfortable honouring someone who insists those boundaries don’t exist at all. And this isn’t the first time institutions have tried to sell Canadians this idea. Johnstone was previously the keynote speaker at the YWCA Regina’s Women of Distinction Awards, another event meant to celebrate women’s achievements — but apparently now open to men who identify as women. At some point, we have to ask the obvious question: If awards for women keep going to men, what exactly is left that belongs to women? It’s institutional cowardice dressed up as progress. Real feminism used to mean defending women, even when it was unpopular. Even when powerful people didn’t like it. The Famous Five challenged the establishment because women were being erased from the definition of “persons.” Today, their legacy is being used to applaud the erasure of women from their own spaces. If Emily Murphy and Nellie McClung could see what their foundation is doing now, they would probably ask a very simple question: After everything we fought for… how did it come to this? Because the truth is, the people running these institutions today are not continuing the legacy of the Famous Five. They’re dismantling it. REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid:

Rebel News

63,895 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This is what Smash Sisters looked like in 2017. The recent attention that Smash Sisters has gotten, has made me realize that I had almost entirely forgotten that this group even exists. Smash Sisters events used to be scheduled into the streaming blocks of major tournaments. They had crew battles on the big stage streamed live in front of thousands of people. You could literally see top melee players in the crowd supporting these events, as evidenced in this video. So... why is it that we now only hear faint whispers of these events through locked down social media posts like this one? What happened? Simply - The group of people that Smash Sisters was created in order to platform and protect no longer exists within the melee community, at least not to a meaningful degree, and they have been replaced by an entirely different group of people. To deny that is to deny reality. This is not a hateful message. This is not a bigoted message. It is a truthful and well-meaning one. As stated in this video by the founders of Smash Sisters, the group was created in order to grow the melee scene by providing an incentive for women to sign up for smash events. That incentive being community. Comradery. By lowering the barrier of entry, it allows an opportunity for growth - particularly for those women who had an interest in smash, but lacked a support system, or for women who had qualms about signing up for a tournament, going 0-2, and then sitting around for three days by themselves. It was an inherently inclusive endeavor, and a net positive on the community. Now, Smash Sisters is completely unrecognizable. It is a pale imitation of what it once was, and was meant to be. Their events are, almost entirely, transgender exclusive - run by and competed in by individuals who regularly and openly advocate for violence, attempt to silence any and all criticism of the group in its current iteration, and call for the removal of individuals from the melee community who do not agree with their personal beliefs and ideologies. It is, now, inherently exclusionary and polarizing, and conceivably off-putting to those very same women for whom Smash Sisters was created in the first place.

MeleeIsCooked

81,852 просмотров • 1 год назад

Once again Labor and the Greens have taken an alarming and undemocratic step by blocking my bill that sought to uphold the biological definitions of 'man' and 'woman' and protect the rights of women before it even had a chance to be debated. This silencing of important discussions is not only an attack on free speech but also a complete disregard for the voices of Australians who support One Nation’s stance on protecting biological reality. As elected representatives, we all have a duty to allow debate on issues that matter to Australians. Women in this country have fought for their rights for generations, and it’s outrageous that their rights are being undermined by a small minority pushing a radical agenda. You can’t disrupt society as a whole when the majority of people in this country are either male or female. By allowing this small group to impinge on women’s rights, their private spaces, change rooms, and sporting events, you are disregarding the very women who have fought so long and hard for their place in society. How dare Labor, the Greens, and Senators Pocock, Tyrell and Thorpe deny women these rights without an open and honest debate! Biological sex is a reality, and it’s critical in how we deal with these issues. It’s quite telling when feminists, who’ve never supported me before, are coming out and saying, “I’ve got to support Pauline Hanson on this one. She’s right.” So what are Labor and the Greens so afraid of? Is this purely about securing votes or political gain? Common sense must prevail. Listen to the Australian people. They want debate. They want answers. They want fairness. They don’t want to be shut down. This government, with the help of a few crossbenchers, is doing everything it can to silence those who stand up for biological reality and women’s rights. Australians deserve better. It’s time to stand up for women’s rights, for biological reality, and for the democratic process. Let’s have the debate, not shut it down. It’s time to put the people of Australia first. This video contains the full debate on the bill so I encourage you to watch it, hear the arguments for yourself, and see the pathetic arguments Labor and the Greens are using to shut down these important discussions are being silenced in Parliament.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

173,517 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 **CALLING ALL FEMALE NHS WORKERS** 🚨 If you’re a member of UNISON - UK's largest union , you might want to know what your union is campaigning for. In this video, UNISON’s general secretary Andrea Egan says the union wants the law changed so it is easier for men who identify as women to be legally recognised as women. This isn't about pronouns or paperwork. It is about whether women can expect spaces such as toilets, showers and changing rooms to remain for women only. We have already seen what happens when employers get this wrong. The Darlington Nurses had to take their NHS Trust to court after a male colleague who identified as a woman was allowed to use their changing room. Nurse Sandie Peggie was suspended and investigated after objecting to sharing a female changing room with a male doctor who identified as a woman. Both succeeded in significant parts of their legal cases - but legal action should never have been necessary. These were women simply asking to get changed at work without a man present. Egan also appears confused about the law. The new EHRC guidance covers services and public functions. Workplace toilets, showers and changing rooms are governed separately by the 1992 Workplace Regulations. Perhaps she is simply making a political point. But the absence of any acknowledgement of female workers’ rights to privacy and dignity is extraordinary for the leader of a union whose membership is overwhelmingly female. So if you’re a female healthcare worker paying UNISON membership fees, it’s worth knowing that your money may be helping fund campaigns that aim to weaken the rights of women and girls. If that doesn’t sit well with you, perhaps it’s time to ask whether UNISON is still the right union for you.

Janet Murray

25,292 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

⚡️Women Rights Under the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan For years, the West and the United States have persistently tried to portray Afghanistan as a country where women are denied all rights. Yet such claims often rely more on political narratives than on verifiable realities. There is, in fact, substantial evidence and numerous examples that challenge this portrayal and present a different picture. One clear example can be seen in footage aired by Afghanistan’s well-known broadcaster TOLO, where large gatherings of women are shown openly discussing women’s rights in Islam on television. This video also includes footage of Afghan women working abroad, teaching, learning, and doing business. A notable example is women’s growing role in commerce. Recently, an exhibition for female entrepreneurs and businesswomen was held in Kabul, featuring 120 booths dedicated to showcasing their products and services. Thousands of women in Kabul remain actively engaged in business, with their enterprises continuing to expand. Similar examples can be found across different provinces, where women are involved in trade and entrepreneurship in various sectors, all within the framework of Islamic values. In the governmental and public-service sectors, women continue to serve in areas where their presence is considered necessary. This includes roles in police departments, particularly in responsibilities related to women and family matters, as well as positions in national ID centers, healthcare institutions, and other administrative sectors. Women in Afghanistan also continue to receive religious education, work as teachers in girls’ schools, teach in madrasas, and serve in hospitals and health centers nationwide. For women who prefer to remain at home, opportunities have also been created for home-based businesses and the use of personal skills and crafts as a source of income. The broader message, therefore, is that observers should look beyond external propaganda and examine realities on the ground through official Afghan media and credible domestic outlets. Those seeking an accurate understanding of Afghanistan’s situation are encouraged to assess the facts directly rather than relying solely on foreign narratives.

W.A. Mubariz - وکیل احمد مبارز

15,209 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад