正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This obvious and conclusive evidence which did not overturn the wrong call is getting out of hand in MLB. Detroit Tigers manager A.J. Hinch was ejected after the Tigers lost their challenge on an out call at third base. Just get rid of replay then if you have people... show more

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

299,474 subscribers

72,889 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治体育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This happened during the Cubs vs Rangers game. A grounder to first and the first baseman throws home to get the out at home plate. Catcher applies the tag, the runner is called safe. Replay clearly shows the runner is out. The Cubs challenge the call and are confident it is going to be overturned. After replay, the runner is called safe! 🤯 How can the replay booth who has every angle in the book at their disposal (not that you needed more than one) botch this call after the umpire just botched it? Do people lose their jobs over this? Have you seen a more terrible call ever in the replay challenge era?

This happened during the Cubs vs Rangers game. A grounder to first and the first baseman throws home to get the out at home plate. Catcher applies the tag, the runner is called safe. Replay clearly shows the runner is out. The Cubs challenge the call and are confident it is going to be overturned. After replay, the runner is called safe! 🤯 How can the replay booth who has every angle in the book at their disposal (not that you needed more than one) botch this call after the umpire just botched it? Do people lose their jobs over this? Have you seen a more terrible call ever in the replay challenge era?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

2,657,000 次观看 • 5 个月前

Not sure how on earth they can review that call at first and say Sal Stewart’s foot wasn’t on the base??? All the cameras and they still get it wrong. #Reds manager Terry Francona ejected after coming out to argue with the umpires.

Not sure how on earth they can review that call at first and say Sal Stewart’s foot wasn’t on the base??? All the cameras and they still get it wrong. #Reds manager Terry Francona ejected after coming out to argue with the umpires.

Joey DeBerardino

15,931 次观看 • 4 个月前

Joe West says one of the greatest benefits of replay review was the players' realization that umpires care about getting every call right. "You'd call a guy out, and he'd say, 'You just called me out because you didn't like me.' That's the furthest thing from the truth."

Joe West says one of the greatest benefits of replay review was the players' realization that umpires care about getting every call right. "You'd call a guy out, and he'd say, 'You just called me out because you didn't like me.' That's the furthest thing from the truth."

Foul Territory

360,235 次观看 • 6 个月前

This 96 mph high and inside pitch by Cubs pitcher Ben Brown almost beans Pittsburgh Pirates batter Konnor Griffin. Griffin thinks and acts like it hit him and starts to trot down to first. The home plate umpire rules that the batter was not hit by the pitch. The replay booth checks it out and rules with the umpire- the batter was not hit. Pirates manager Don Kelly came out to argue and was ejected. The announcer says Griffin isn’t just going to drop his bat and run to first. Uhm, yes, players have been known to fake getting hit. After replay, to be honest, I cannot tell if he got hit. Replay has to be conclusive to overturn it. What do you think? Do your eyes see the ball hit the bill of the helmet? Was he hit or not? Did replay get it right or wrong?

This 96 mph high and inside pitch by Cubs pitcher Ben Brown almost beans Pittsburgh Pirates batter Konnor Griffin. Griffin thinks and acts like it hit him and starts to trot down to first. The home plate umpire rules that the batter was not hit by the pitch. The replay booth checks it out and rules with the umpire- the batter was not hit. Pirates manager Don Kelly came out to argue and was ejected. The announcer says Griffin isn’t just going to drop his bat and run to first. Uhm, yes, players have been known to fake getting hit. After replay, to be honest, I cannot tell if he got hit. Replay has to be conclusive to overturn it. What do you think? Do your eyes see the ball hit the bill of the helmet? Was he hit or not? Did replay get it right or wrong?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

158,147 次观看 • 4 个月前

First off great throw from the right fielder. But it’s beyond obvious he never got the tag on him. Most telling reason is him immediately going to put the tag back on his knee after swiping wildly and missing. Ump is right on top of it and misses it. Ok, at least that’s why we have replay. Replay also gets it wrong. Home plate ump then gets the announcement of the incorrect call, incorrect. Bad all the way around. Failed at every aspect of the execution of that play/call. And did it in a tie game in an elimination game. Pathetic.

First off great throw from the right fielder. But it’s beyond obvious he never got the tag on him. Most telling reason is him immediately going to put the tag back on his knee after swiping wildly and missing. Ump is right on top of it and misses it. Ok, at least that’s why we have replay. Replay also gets it wrong. Home plate ump then gets the announcement of the incorrect call, incorrect. Bad all the way around. Failed at every aspect of the execution of that play/call. And did it in a tie game in an elimination game. Pathetic.

Chris Marler

74,305 次观看 • 4 个月前

This happened between the Dodgers and Cardinals several days ago. Mookie Betts singles to right and Andy Pages is on his way home from second base. Phillies right fielder Adolis Garcia comes up firing and throws a strike to home plate. The catcher goes to tag, Pages slides- the call- safe! The Cardinals challenged the call but in looking over the replay you can see that Andy Pages never touched home plate. But, the challenge was to see if the catcher tagged him. Replay rules that the catcher did not tag him. So the call stands- he’s safe! But, he missed home plate! Replay does not have the authority to change the call just because he missed home plate. 🤯 That is a bizarre play!💯 Do you think a call should be overturned if they are looking at a particular part of the play but notice something else like this where the runner didn’t touch home plate?

This happened between the Dodgers and Cardinals several days ago. Mookie Betts singles to right and Andy Pages is on his way home from second base. Phillies right fielder Adolis Garcia comes up firing and throws a strike to home plate. The catcher goes to tag, Pages slides- the call- safe! The Cardinals challenged the call but in looking over the replay you can see that Andy Pages never touched home plate. But, the challenge was to see if the catcher tagged him. Replay rules that the catcher did not tag him. So the call stands- he’s safe! But, he missed home plate! Replay does not have the authority to change the call just because he missed home plate. 🤯 That is a bizarre play!💯 Do you think a call should be overturned if they are looking at a particular part of the play but notice something else like this where the runner didn’t touch home plate?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

29,832 次观看 • 4 个月前

THERE’S NO WAY YOU CAN OVERTURN THAT CALL‼️ Called a FUMBLE on the field, now you’re trying to split fucking micro-hairs to give Georgia yet ANOTHER favorable call Replay is meant for “clear and obvious errors” not to manipulate games 🚮 #GoGators 🐊

THERE’S NO WAY YOU CAN OVERTURN THAT CALL‼️ Called a FUMBLE on the field, now you’re trying to split fucking micro-hairs to give Georgia yet ANOTHER favorable call Replay is meant for “clear and obvious errors” not to manipulate games 🚮 #GoGators 🐊

Sebastian Fearon DPT, CSCS, OCS

222,655 次观看 • 11 个月前

The only call I do is you 👤: since working together have you guys been talking more? 🧸: stuck on each other like a fried dough stick 🦋: we talk to each other about everything. If there’s anything I just pick up the phone and call. I’m an introvert so I don’t usually call anyone but I do it with Miu. But Miu calls me anyway, so no worry there. 🧸: nooo, I usually just call the same people in my favourites, so I’d call P’Lena. I’m impatient, and with texts I’m like when will they respond, so I just call. If she doesn’t pick up and there’s a beep, means she has put on ‘do not disturb’ so I call again to get rid of the ‘do not disturb’ 😭

The only call I do is you 👤: since working together have you guys been talking more? 🧸: stuck on each other like a fried dough stick 🦋: we talk to each other about everything. If there’s anything I just pick up the phone and call. I’m an introvert so I don’t usually call anyone but I do it with Miu. But Miu calls me anyway, so no worry there. 🧸: nooo, I usually just call the same people in my favourites, so I’d call P’Lena. I’m impatient, and with texts I’m like when will they respond, so I just call. If she doesn’t pick up and there’s a beep, means she has put on ‘do not disturb’ so I call again to get rid of the ‘do not disturb’ 😭

Shez.

34,847 次观看 • 11 个月前

What a HORRIBLE strike call with the go ahead run on third base in the bottom of the ninth inning. Coach Bolt is a saint for not chewing this umpires head off. Nebraska Baseball and USC to extra innings.

What a HORRIBLE strike call with the go ahead run on third base in the bottom of the ninth inning. Coach Bolt is a saint for not chewing this umpires head off. Nebraska Baseball and USC to extra innings.

Derrick Pearson

48,332 次观看 • 5 个月前

Harness vs. Graphs, clearly explained! a harness is great, and most people think it is the whole thing: retries, timeouts, a sandbox, a log, the context it assembles before every call. all of that is real work, and all of it wraps exactly one call. run it a hundred times and you have one call, made very safely, a hundred times. Graph engineering fixes this by moving the decision up a layer: not how safely one call is made, but which calls exist to be made at all. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: the harness is everything around one call. the graph is everything between them. ↳ around one call: retry, timeout, sandbox, log, assemble the context, hand back a result ↳ between calls: split, fan out, merge, gate, send back Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the harness does not go away when you build a graph. it moves under each node, and now there are five of them, each wrapping a call you would never have made by hand. the trick is knowing which layer a failure belongs to. turn a piece off and run it again. if the call still works, it was the harness. if the wrong step runs at all, it was the graph. people spend weeks hardening a harness around a node that should not have existed. one thing to know before you scale it. most of what people call their agent is a harness with a chat box on it. ↳ it retries, it times out, it logs, it assembles context, it holds one call up beautifully ↳ it has never once decided that a second call should exist, and that is the entire difference that last one catches careful people. a harness that never fails is not evidence the system is right. it is evidence one call went well, which is the smallest possible claim. and the one that eats whole nights: a harness cannot save you from the wrong step running. you can retry a bad decision three times with a clean log and perfect isolation, and all you bought was three copies of it. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Harness vs. Graphs, clearly explained! a harness is great, and most people think it is the whole thing: retries, timeouts, a sandbox, a log, the context it assembles before every call. all of that is real work, and all of it wraps exactly one call. run it a hundred times and you have one call, made very safely, a hundred times. Graph engineering fixes this by moving the decision up a layer: not how safely one call is made, but which calls exist to be made at all. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: the harness is everything around one call. the graph is everything between them. ↳ around one call: retry, timeout, sandbox, log, assemble the context, hand back a result ↳ between calls: split, fan out, merge, gate, send back Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the harness does not go away when you build a graph. it moves under each node, and now there are five of them, each wrapping a call you would never have made by hand. the trick is knowing which layer a failure belongs to. turn a piece off and run it again. if the call still works, it was the harness. if the wrong step runs at all, it was the graph. people spend weeks hardening a harness around a node that should not have existed. one thing to know before you scale it. most of what people call their agent is a harness with a chat box on it. ↳ it retries, it times out, it logs, it assembles context, it holds one call up beautifully ↳ it has never once decided that a second call should exist, and that is the entire difference that last one catches careful people. a harness that never fails is not evidence the system is right. it is evidence one call went well, which is the smallest possible claim. and the one that eats whole nights: a harness cannot save you from the wrong step running. you can retry a bad decision three times with a clean log and perfect isolation, and all you bought was three copies of it. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Hanako

51,536 次观看 • 29 天前

I love this from Andrew Klavan because I value integrity from people who supposedly profess to care about the truth. There are a lot of people in the conservative ecosphere right now who think they will just go along to get along and not make waves. That’s not how this works. I call out the left on their racism, Marxism and antisemitism or just plan old narrative and agenda driving lies. If we cannot call out our own side when they do it, we have no business saying a word about the left. Gaslighting. Narrative building. Agenda setting and them playing dumb isn’t new. It’s what MSNBC does. I call it out when they do it. I will call it out when Tucker or any other public voice is the a giant platform does it. And yes, people are scared to call it out. They shouldn’t be.

I love this from Andrew Klavan because I value integrity from people who supposedly profess to care about the truth. There are a lot of people in the conservative ecosphere right now who think they will just go along to get along and not make waves. That’s not how this works. I call out the left on their racism, Marxism and antisemitism or just plan old narrative and agenda driving lies. If we cannot call out our own side when they do it, we have no business saying a word about the left. Gaslighting. Narrative building. Agenda setting and them playing dumb isn’t new. It’s what MSNBC does. I call it out when they do it. I will call it out when Tucker or any other public voice is the a giant platform does it. And yes, people are scared to call it out. They shouldn’t be.

Insurrection Barbie

66,560 次观看 • 1 年前

This was the most controversial decisions in modern soccer. The ball hit a camera cable, and the play should have been stopped.This is an objective rules error, not a bad call. Norway has the right to request a replay.

This was the most controversial decisions in modern soccer. The ball hit a camera cable, and the play should have been stopped.This is an objective rules error, not a bad call. Norway has the right to request a replay.

VICTORIA FOREVER MAGA 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 🇬🇷

59,799 次观看 • 3 个月前

OMG 🤣 Candace Owens REASSURES her demoralized fan base that her FAKE theories weren’t actually debunked after all. She claims it was all just a PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION to mislead them and that people are being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in bitcoin to LAUGH at her and call her crazy. There’s an EASY way to figure out if all of this is actually TRUE or not. Just LAUGH at Candace and call her CRAZY in the comments below. If you get a MYSTERIOUS call and $600,000 comes ROLLING IN to your bank accounts or crypto wallets then we’ll have no choice but to ADMIT that Candace was actually right. Go ahead and give it a try. 👇

OMG 🤣 Candace Owens REASSURES her demoralized fan base that her FAKE theories weren’t actually debunked after all. She claims it was all just a PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION to mislead them and that people are being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in bitcoin to LAUGH at her and call her crazy. There’s an EASY way to figure out if all of this is actually TRUE or not. Just LAUGH at Candace and call her CRAZY in the comments below. If you get a MYSTERIOUS call and $600,000 comes ROLLING IN to your bank accounts or crypto wallets then we’ll have no choice but to ADMIT that Candace was actually right. Go ahead and give it a try. 👇

Cinema Shogun

34,084 次观看 • 9 个月前

The way these people steal and then get offended when you call them out on it needs to be studied. Or is stealing just a form of reparations?

The way these people steal and then get offended when you call them out on it needs to be studied. Or is stealing just a form of reparations?

Amiri King

104,648 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 JD Vance BOMBSHELL: "Alien Abductions could be demons" 👽🇺🇸 "You can call it an ALIEN if you want but there is a lot of historical precedent to call it a DEMON" "if we are talking about an extraterrestrial being that is human like but not human, one that contains effectively infinite powers and is torturing human beings, you can call it an alien if you want. But there is a lot of historical precedent to call that a demon" As Vice President, Vance has repeatedly said he is obsessed with getting to the bottom of the UAP files and has the highest level security clearance to do so. What do you think this means for the ongoing conversation around non human intelligence?

🚨 JD Vance BOMBSHELL: "Alien Abductions could be demons" 👽🇺🇸 "You can call it an ALIEN if you want but there is a lot of historical precedent to call it a DEMON" "if we are talking about an extraterrestrial being that is human like but not human, one that contains effectively infinite powers and is torturing human beings, you can call it an alien if you want. But there is a lot of historical precedent to call that a demon" As Vice President, Vance has repeatedly said he is obsessed with getting to the bottom of the UAP files and has the highest level security clearance to do so. What do you think this means for the ongoing conversation around non human intelligence?

Interstellar

57,670 次观看 • 2 个月前

This minor league pitcher for the Lake County Captains threw an inside pitch and the initial call was a foul ball against the batter for the Dayton Dragons. The batter was bent over in pain. Replay clearly shows that the batter was hit on the elbow but he is wearing a plastic elbow guard so maybe the sound made the umpire think it hit the bat. The coach comes over to vehemently argue the call and the umpire ejects him from the game. I didn’t see the plate umpire ask for help from the infield umpires. If he didn’t, he should have. The coach had a legitimate argument and was correct. I thought minor league baseball used replay too so not sure why it wasn’t reviewed. Maybe they don’t. What’s even more bizarre is the pitcher ends up striking the batter out and then starts celebrating and walking towards him. They ejected him. 🤯 Do you think if an umpire ejects a player or coach over arguing a call but it is determined later that the player or coach was indeed correct that the umpire should be penalized somehow? A fine maybe? A game assignment taken away? I think they should.

This minor league pitcher for the Lake County Captains threw an inside pitch and the initial call was a foul ball against the batter for the Dayton Dragons. The batter was bent over in pain. Replay clearly shows that the batter was hit on the elbow but he is wearing a plastic elbow guard so maybe the sound made the umpire think it hit the bat. The coach comes over to vehemently argue the call and the umpire ejects him from the game. I didn’t see the plate umpire ask for help from the infield umpires. If he didn’t, he should have. The coach had a legitimate argument and was correct. I thought minor league baseball used replay too so not sure why it wasn’t reviewed. Maybe they don’t. What’s even more bizarre is the pitcher ends up striking the batter out and then starts celebrating and walking towards him. They ejected him. 🤯 Do you think if an umpire ejects a player or coach over arguing a call but it is determined later that the player or coach was indeed correct that the umpire should be penalized somehow? A fine maybe? A game assignment taken away? I think they should.

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

37,541 次观看 • 4 个月前

This happened in a game between the Chicago Cubs and New York Mets that I’ve never seen before. Pete Crow-Armstrong was on first base. The pitch goes to home and Armstrong is off trying to steal second base. He slides into second and is called safe. New York challenges the call and it is overturned and he is called out. They said he came off the bag. Not strange right? However, it was ball four. Pete is entitled to second base. You can hear the announcers- “it doesn’t matter if he’s tagged. It’s ball four. The base is his.” Craig Counsel the Cubs manager was ejected when he came out to argue. Did the umpires and replay get it right? Have you ever seen such a thing? Isn’t he entitled to the base on a walk?

This happened in a game between the Chicago Cubs and New York Mets that I’ve never seen before. Pete Crow-Armstrong was on first base. The pitch goes to home and Armstrong is off trying to steal second base. He slides into second and is called safe. New York challenges the call and it is overturned and he is called out. They said he came off the bag. Not strange right? However, it was ball four. Pete is entitled to second base. You can hear the announcers- “it doesn’t matter if he’s tagged. It’s ball four. The base is his.” Craig Counsel the Cubs manager was ejected when he came out to argue. Did the umpires and replay get it right? Have you ever seen such a thing? Isn’t he entitled to the base on a walk?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

234,225 次观看 • 3 个月前

“It’s urgent for me, I can’t drive the car.” If you can’t work out how to unplug your new electric car, do NOT call the police. Please only call 999 only if a crime is in progress, there’s a threat to life, or someone is in immediate danger. If it’s not an emergency, report online or call 101.

“It’s urgent for me, I can’t drive the car.” If you can’t work out how to unplug your new electric car, do NOT call the police. Please only call 999 only if a crime is in progress, there’s a threat to life, or someone is in immediate danger. If it’s not an emergency, report online or call 101.

Metropolitan Police

136,161 次观看 • 11 个月前