Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

This peer-reviewed paper has been viewed almost 2 million times. There's a reason for that. It blows a hole straight through the foundations of modern climate theory. The authors show that human CO2 is only 4% of the annual carbon cycle, that natural variability overwhelms the models, and that... show more

Electroverse

44,968 subscribers

68,501 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

$We've been told that a trace gas controls Earth's climate, but the science simply doesn't add up. New analyses show that climate models can't match real-world temperature and sea ice trends unless a strong solar influence is included. Other recent studies from Scafetta, Connolly and Harde all reach the same conclusion: CO2's effect is real but limited, already near saturation, meaning that even doubling it will add only a fraction of a degree to the global temperature. The real drivers are solar variability, ocean dynamics and cloud feedbacks, not a trace gas.$

We've been told that a trace gas controls Earth's climate, but the science simply doesn't add up. New analyses show that climate models can't match real-world temperature and sea ice trends unless a strong solar influence is included. Other recent studies from Scafetta, Connolly and Harde all reach the same conclusion: CO2's effect is real but limited, already near saturation, meaning that even doubling it will add only a fraction of a degree to the global temperature. The real drivers are solar variability, ocean dynamics and cloud feedbacks, not a trace gas.

Electroverse

15,575 просмотров • 23 дней назад

"This is probably the biggest con that we've ever had." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "There is no climate emergency... It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate." "That has never been addressed."

"This is probably the biggest con that we've ever had." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "There is no climate emergency... It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate." "That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

734,912 просмотров • 1 год назад

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

234,342 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Scientists Kesten Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole 'climate crisis' depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.

Scientists Kesten Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole 'climate crisis' depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.

Electroverse

38,576 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

New research says it isn't CO2 driving the climate, rather it's gradients and water vapor. A 2025 study in Frontiers argues the real thermostat is the vertical temperature gradient and the water cycle. Water vapor and clouds account for about 95% of the atmosphere's radiative effect. CO2 contributes roughly 4-5%, with only 4% of that human-made. Without the lapse rate, i.e. the steady cooling with altitude, extra CO2 would have no warming effect at all. On Earth, air cools about 6.5C per kilometer, and that gradient, not carbon, sets surface warmth. In their model, doubling CO2 adds at most 1.5C, or nothing. Moisture, clouds and natural dynamics run the climate. CO2 is just along for the ride.

New research says it isn't CO2 driving the climate, rather it's gradients and water vapor. A 2025 study in Frontiers argues the real thermostat is the vertical temperature gradient and the water cycle. Water vapor and clouds account for about 95% of the atmosphere's radiative effect. CO2 contributes roughly 4-5%, with only 4% of that human-made. Without the lapse rate, i.e. the steady cooling with altitude, extra CO2 would have no warming effect at all. On Earth, air cools about 6.5C per kilometer, and that gradient, not carbon, sets surface warmth. In their model, doubling CO2 adds at most 1.5C, or nothing. Moisture, clouds and natural dynamics run the climate. CO2 is just along for the ride.

Electroverse

22,957 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Studies show temperatures over Greenland peaked around 2012 and have stalled or declined ever since. The authors point to natural variability driven by shifting wind patterns, adding that modern climate models can't reproduce Greenland's natural swings. And now in 2026, Greenland is flirting with record cold: Summit Station posted -65.3C on Feb 25, a reading just 2C shy of its monthly record. Natural variability is still in control.

Studies show temperatures over Greenland peaked around 2012 and have stalled or declined ever since. The authors point to natural variability driven by shifting wind patterns, adding that modern climate models can't reproduce Greenland's natural swings. And now in 2026, Greenland is flirting with record cold: Summit Station posted -65.3C on Feb 25, a reading just 2C shy of its monthly record. Natural variability is still in control.

Electroverse

14,031 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The IPCC says 'man-made' CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries longer than 'natural' CO2. A new paper shows there is no physical basis for that claim. The atmosphere, oceans and land biosphere form one coupled system. CO2 is constantly exchanged between them. If human CO2 really lingered for decades longer, these observed exchange relationships would break. They do not. The sinks do not 'know' whether a CO2 molecule came from a chimney stack or a forest. Man-made and natural CO2 are absorbed at the same rate, with measurements showing an average atmospheric residence time of about four years. That behavior follows basic physics. However, when the physics don't cooperate, the IPCC rewrites reality.

The IPCC says 'man-made' CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries longer than 'natural' CO2. A new paper shows there is no physical basis for that claim. The atmosphere, oceans and land biosphere form one coupled system. CO2 is constantly exchanged between them. If human CO2 really lingered for decades longer, these observed exchange relationships would break. They do not. The sinks do not 'know' whether a CO2 molecule came from a chimney stack or a forest. Man-made and natural CO2 are absorbed at the same rate, with measurements showing an average atmospheric residence time of about four years. That behavior follows basic physics. However, when the physics don't cooperate, the IPCC rewrites reality.

Electroverse

15,080 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

One of the stranger claims I see online is that reducing CO₂ would somehow be “the end of humanity because we need CO2 to breathe.” In reality, the carbon we exhale (not inhale) is part of a short, natural cycle: plants take it in, we eat the plants (or animals that ate them), and we release that carbon back into the air within a year or so. What’s not natural is digging up fossil fuels—carbon that’s been locked underground for millions of years—and releasing it all at once. Watch more CO2-related comment section chaos by subscribing on Substack: or Patreon: #climatechange

One of the stranger claims I see online is that reducing CO₂ would somehow be “the end of humanity because we need CO2 to breathe.” In reality, the carbon we exhale (not inhale) is part of a short, natural cycle: plants take it in, we eat the plants (or animals that ate them), and we release that carbon back into the air within a year or so. What’s not natural is digging up fossil fuels—carbon that’s been locked underground for millions of years—and releasing it all at once. Watch more CO2-related comment section chaos by subscribing on Substack: or Patreon: #climatechange

Prof. Katharine Hayhoe

20,585 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

"The whole thing is a fallacy right from the start." Geologist Ian Plimer dispels the "climate crisis" narrative, arguing that no scientific paper to date has demonstrated human-induced carbon dioxide emissions as a driver of global warming. He maintains that climate models fail because they assume CO₂ drives temperature rise, which he describes as a religious belief unsupported by evidence.

"The whole thing is a fallacy right from the start." Geologist Ian Plimer dispels the "climate crisis" narrative, arguing that no scientific paper to date has demonstrated human-induced carbon dioxide emissions as a driver of global warming. He maintains that climate models fail because they assume CO₂ drives temperature rise, which he describes as a religious belief unsupported by evidence.

Wide Awake Media

49,163 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

On the absurdity of the CO2 theory of climate change and on the real reason the Net Zero fraud is being pushed by the powers that be. The theory itself is a scientific impossibility: it can never be proven empirically.

On the absurdity of the CO2 theory of climate change and on the real reason the Net Zero fraud is being pushed by the powers that be. The theory itself is a scientific impossibility: it can never be proven empirically.

Robin Monotti

29,931 просмотров • 1 год назад

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

35,265 просмотров • 13 дней назад

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

Electroverse

215,359 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 CLIMATE SCIENTIST REVEALS THE TRUTH! 🌍 CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT THE PROBLEM…“In my training carbon dioxide and it’s rise or fall could explain everything that had EVER happened in our climatic history!”. The truth is that carbon dioxide has a logarithmic relationship with temperature, and as CO2 increases it has LESS of a warming effect. We are already at 99% of its saturation point, which means no matter how much more carbon dioxide we pump into the atmosphere, the Earth will NOT warm significantly in response. This makes the man-made climate argument, frankly, fall on it’s arse 🫡

🚨 CLIMATE SCIENTIST REVEALS THE TRUTH! 🌍 CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT THE PROBLEM…“In my training carbon dioxide and it’s rise or fall could explain everything that had EVER happened in our climatic history!”. The truth is that carbon dioxide has a logarithmic relationship with temperature, and as CO2 increases it has LESS of a warming effect. We are already at 99% of its saturation point, which means no matter how much more carbon dioxide we pump into the atmosphere, the Earth will NOT warm significantly in response. This makes the man-made climate argument, frankly, fall on it’s arse 🫡

Anika

42,475 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

770,537 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Astrophysicist Dr Willie Soon says the climate is driven overwhelmingly by the sun, not by human carbon dioxide. He notes the sun supplies 99.99% of Earth's energy and its output fluctuates matching temperature shifts far better than CO2 trends. Soon argues the CO2 signal is below detection as a primary driver and that past climate swings like the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age line up with solar variability, not emissions. Dr Soon calls the obsession with carbon dioxide political. You can tax CO2 but you can't tax the sun. He describes an "iron triangle" of government funding, compliant science and media amplification that turns uncertainty into dogma. Soon's message is simple: The climate system is solar driven, the CO2 narrative is wildly overstated and the real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy, not pretending we can regulate the sun.

Astrophysicist Dr Willie Soon says the climate is driven overwhelmingly by the sun, not by human carbon dioxide. He notes the sun supplies 99.99% of Earth's energy and its output fluctuates matching temperature shifts far better than CO2 trends. Soon argues the CO2 signal is below detection as a primary driver and that past climate swings like the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age line up with solar variability, not emissions. Dr Soon calls the obsession with carbon dioxide political. You can tax CO2 but you can't tax the sun. He describes an "iron triangle" of government funding, compliant science and media amplification that turns uncertainty into dogma. Soon's message is simple: The climate system is solar driven, the CO2 narrative is wildly overstated and the real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy, not pretending we can regulate the sun.

Electroverse

35,322 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Joe Rogan and Mel Gibson explore how the human-induced climate change narrative has been weaponised into a tool for propagating fear, consolidating power and enriching powerful interests. "There's no static temperature of Earth, ever... Way before human beings had ever existed, there's always this rise and fall, and this idea that the whole thing is based on carbon emissions from human beings is total bull*hit. It's not true."

Joe Rogan and Mel Gibson explore how the human-induced climate change narrative has been weaponised into a tool for propagating fear, consolidating power and enriching powerful interests. "There's no static temperature of Earth, ever... Way before human beings had ever existed, there's always this rise and fall, and this idea that the whole thing is based on carbon emissions from human beings is total bull*hit. It's not true."

Wide Awake Media

33,604 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

A powerful moment from a recent Senate hearing exposed the shaky foundation of the World Health Organization's (WHO) claim that vaccines saved "154 million lives" over 50 years. A critical analysis revealed the claim is not based on solid data, but on unreliable modeling. The bombshell was found buried on page 42 of the study's own supplement. In a section titled "Uncertainty of Estimates," the authors explicitly admit they cannot put "bounds around the veracity of the estimates," stating that any bounds would be "arbitrary." This means the widely touted "154 million" figure has no statistical confidence interval. As presented, the number is so unbounded and unreliable that, by the study's own admission, it holds no verifiable scientific weight. The encounter highlighted a critical clash between evidence-based science and the presentation of unscrutinized models as fact. It serves as a crucial reminder that all claims, especially those driving global public health policy, must be grounded in transparent, peer-reviewed data that can withstand rigorous scrutiny.

A powerful moment from a recent Senate hearing exposed the shaky foundation of the World Health Organization's (WHO) claim that vaccines saved "154 million lives" over 50 years. A critical analysis revealed the claim is not based on solid data, but on unreliable modeling. The bombshell was found buried on page 42 of the study's own supplement. In a section titled "Uncertainty of Estimates," the authors explicitly admit they cannot put "bounds around the veracity of the estimates," stating that any bounds would be "arbitrary." This means the widely touted "154 million" figure has no statistical confidence interval. As presented, the number is so unbounded and unreliable that, by the study's own admission, it holds no verifiable scientific weight. The encounter highlighted a critical clash between evidence-based science and the presentation of unscrutinized models as fact. It serves as a crucial reminder that all claims, especially those driving global public health policy, must be grounded in transparent, peer-reviewed data that can withstand rigorous scrutiny.

Camus

13,120 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

A study in Communications Earth and Environment shows temperatures over Greenland peaked around 2012 and have stalled or declined ever since. The authors point to natural variability driven by shifting wind patterns, and they add that modern climate models struggle to reproduce Greenland's natural swings. A second study backs this up. It also finds Greenland temperatures are essentially flat, with no significant trend. Greenland is not following the warming script. Temperatures peak, stall or cool depending on circulation, not CO2. And in 2026, Greenland has been flirting with record cold. Summit Station logged -65.3C on February 25, a reading just 2C shy of its monthly record. Natural variability is still in control.

A study in Communications Earth and Environment shows temperatures over Greenland peaked around 2012 and have stalled or declined ever since. The authors point to natural variability driven by shifting wind patterns, and they add that modern climate models struggle to reproduce Greenland's natural swings. A second study backs this up. It also finds Greenland temperatures are essentially flat, with no significant trend. Greenland is not following the warming script. Temperatures peak, stall or cool depending on circulation, not CO2. And in 2026, Greenland has been flirting with record cold. Summit Station logged -65.3C on February 25, a reading just 2C shy of its monthly record. Natural variability is still in control.

Electroverse

12,214 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад