Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 “This Problem Is a Muslim Problem” Julie Hartley-Brewer Drops the Truth Bomb Starmer, Labour and the Establishment Are Too Cowardly to Admit 🔥 Julie Hartley-Brewer is spot on, and refreshingly unafraid to say what far too many politicians are too cowardly to admit. We should be arresting non-British...

19,400 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I asked the Safeguarding Minister, Jess Phillips, if she'd considered the impact that mass migration has on the safety of women and girls. She said that there's no reliable data on this issue. But that isn't entirely true. There is indicative data, and it is damning. It's true that people from any country, or culture, can be violence towards women and girls, including sexually. It's also true that, regardless of a person's background, we should come down hard on those who commit violent or sexual abuse. However, we should also recognise that not every culture has the same attitudes towards women and girls. In some cultures, for example, it's seen as indecent for a woman to walk around without her hair covered. In most cultures, it’s normal for men and women to be segregated for some things (like getting changed); in some cultures, men and women are segregated for many more things. In some cultures, physical and sexual violence towards women is commonplace. When men from those cultures come to this country, those are the cultural assumptions they bring with them. This makes intuitive sense. Why would we expect people to suddenly adopt British norms, habits, and behaviours, immediately upon arriving here? Particularly when so many people in the British state are unwilling to recognise that different cultures have different norms in the first place? That's not to say that everybody from these cultures poses a threat to women and girls. And of course, some of those people may have wanted to come here to get away from those very cultural expectations. But what we often see is that, 'per capita' (or per person), people from certain nationalities are more likely to commit certain types of crime when they come to the UK. That's particularly true in the case of illegal migrants, who are disproportionately likely to be young men - the group most likely to commit violent or sexual crime. Back in October, Labour MPs voted to block the release of detailed migrant crime data, which would have given us the full picture about how likely different migrant groups are to commit certain crimes. Some nationalities might be more likely to commit crime than British nationals. Others might be less likely. But at least we'd have the data, which would allow us to have an informed debate about this. However, thanks to the hard work of campaigners and journalists, we have some indicative data about the rates at which different nationalities commit crime, including crime which disproportionately targets women and girls. For example, data obtained from the Ministry of Justice last year showed that two nationalities, Afghans and Eritreans, were more than 20 times as likely to be convicted of a sexual offence than British nationals. This data showed that Afghans had a conviction rate for sexual offences of 59 per 10,000 people, while Eritreans had a conviction rate of 53.6 per 10,000 people. British nationals, on the other hand, had a conviction rate of 2.66 per 10,000. People have since disputed those figures. They say that, since the population figures used to work out this data are taken from the 2021 Census, we're likely to be undercounting the number of Afghans and Eritreans in the country. But even if that's true, the rate of conviction for sexual offences would still be much higher amongst Afghans and Eritreans than amongst British nationals. If this indicative data is wrong, then the Government should publish the full figures. Their failure to do so is a choice. We can collect a person's nationality when they're arrested, when they stand trial, and when they go to prison. People deserve to know what impact mass migration is having on the safety of women and girls. We need to be able to tell the truth about the fact that not every culture treats women in the same way, and that when people arrive here, they often bring that cultural baggage with them.

Katie Lam

174,637 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The grotesque hypocrisy of Keir Starmer & our political class They celebrated mass immigration of peoples who hold views & beliefs that are abhorrent to our culture Now, they are SHOCKED at the state of Britain Yet still they will not name radical Islam as the cause of rampant anti-Semitism...not to mention anti-white racism, misogyny, homophobia, cousin marriage, child marriage, a loathing of Britain and the West etc. etc. What self-serving cowards. They have no problem denouncing "the far right" or "online hate", but they cannot bring themselves to call out Islamic extremism by name. Instead, the best they can do is to deflect attention on to the pro-Palestine marches. I loathe the marches. But what is banning going to achieve? Banning marches is no more a solution to the problem than banning the sale of pointy kitchen knives is a solution to knife crime. The problem Britain faces is not the marches. It is the PEOPLE in those marches: In other words, Muslim extremists and their far-left enablers – a poisonous alliance that despises the West, despises Jews, and despises everything Britain once stood for. You will not change their hearts by banning their parades. They will simply find new ways to express the hatred they were taught, many from the cradle. This is not political incompetence. This is the deliberate, sustained betrayal of the British people by their own political class. Our political elite imported sectarianism, bigotry, and hatred into a peaceful, tolerant country – and now, when the consequences are plain for all to see, they offer us meaningless platitudes and milquetoast bans. This is beyond shameful. We will not forgive them. We cannot afford to. Remember this when you cast your vote.

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

34,833 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Unfortunately, we have many people in Congress and, I suspect, many people in this current administration, who are dual citizens... they are loyal not to the sovereign interests of the U.S., but to this network... who, I believe, run Israel." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Christian Elliot posted to the Deconstructing Convention YouTube channel on January 24, 2026. *Note that I did not make the subtitles in the video. They are from the source video. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "To me, the most important issue, because we do have a constitution. It still exists, it's very powerful, and we still have a sovereign government. Unfortunately, we have many people in Congress and I suspect many people in this current administration who are dual citizens. They are not just Americans. They have passports. Many, I suspect, to Israel. "I did an interview with Cynthia McKinney, used to be a congresswoman from the Atlanta area. And she said the number one problem in Congress is the dual citizen passport group. And they are loyal not to the sovereign interests of the United States, but to this network. And many of those people, again, are in the United States who run, I believe, who run Israel. And this is a real problem. "And one of the reasons it's a real problem is if you look at that network, they are deeply involved in pushing for financial transaction control. And if you're going to give them a get out of jail free card on what they're doing in Israel, and it's not just in Palestine. Netanyahu was very clear. He said, we're going to turn Israel into a lab for Pfizer. And he mandated the shot. "So if you look at what is happening, the genocide is not just in Palestine, it's in Israel, too. [And] Congress gave [Netanyahu] 54 standing ovations."

Sense Receptor

15,079 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Lindsey German, "I'd like you to just look around at your neighbours here this afternoon on this demonstration." "I'd like you to look at the diversity — the different nationalities, the different religions that are here." "Then I would like to ask you whether you think this looks like a hate march, because we are the exact opposite of hate marchers." "Despite what has been said by the police, by Keir Starmer, by the politicians and by the media, everybody is here today because they oppose hate, they oppose war, they oppose genocide, they oppose what is being done to the people of Palestine." "And we are here today in solidarity with the people of Palestine, because it is still going on." "Gaza was bombed last night. Lebanon was bombed last night." "There is no ceasefire and no justice for the Palestinians." "And if you want to see what a real hate march looks like, just look over St James’s Park to Parliament Square." "That’s a hate march." "They hate Muslims, they hate people from abroad, they hate migrants, they hate women, they hate absolutely anybody who isn’t like them." "They are the real hate marchers." "And we are here today to take a stand in solidarity with the Palestinians, but also against any form of racism and fascism." "And one of the most shocking things about all this is the way the police have been criminalising our marches, the way they have been arresting people, the way they try to ban slogans, the way in which they say that people are not allowed to stand up for the Palestinians." "And I’ve got a message for Mark Rowley and the Metropolitan Police." "Do not start telling us what racism looks like." "We know what racism looks like, and we know it much better than the Metropolitan Police know what it looks like." "My final point is this." "Keir Starmer is toast." "He’s not going to last until the autumn, nor should he." "And one of the main reasons he’s toast is because of his foreign policy, because of his support for the genocide, because of all those sorts of deeds." "But do not think that whoever takes his place, they need to change their foreign policy." "We have a big political crisis in this country." "We do not want to have to pay for their crisis."

Farrukh

12,791 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten