正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

“This really puts it into perspective what the Australian Human Rights Commission has been trying to do: say that sex is changeable, that a man can just declare that he is a woman & the rest of us have to accept that…”

Sall Grover

176,765 subscribers

22,016 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“We’ve been forced to have males who identify as lesbians in the lesbian community. There’s been no consultation. This is what the Australian Human Rights Commission are expecting us to accept, that males can be lesbians. And we say no.”

“We’ve been forced to have males who identify as lesbians in the lesbian community. There’s been no consultation. This is what the Australian Human Rights Commission are expecting us to accept, that males can be lesbians. And we say no.”

Sall Grover

100,630 次观看 • 4 个月前

“The Australian Human Rights Commission has never once considered that I might have human rights, that myself & other women in Australia who want female only spaces should have access to them… it’s come from the Australian Human Rights Commission.”

“The Australian Human Rights Commission has never once considered that I might have human rights, that myself & other women in Australia who want female only spaces should have access to them… it’s come from the Australian Human Rights Commission.”

Sall Grover

41,038 次观看 • 1 年前

“The judge has basically said, go back & do the tribunal again & this time remember that women & lesbians also have human rights…” A quick explainer on the Lesbian Action Group v Australian Human Rights Commission decision:

“The judge has basically said, go back & do the tribunal again & this time remember that women & lesbians also have human rights…” A quick explainer on the Lesbian Action Group v Australian Human Rights Commission decision:

Sall Grover

63,170 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jonathan Reynolds: "It's wrong to say that India is being offered something different to what we have with the US, EU, Canada or Japan... this is the Tories & Reform unable to accept that this govt has done what they couldn't do... this is a great deal for the UK."

Jonathan Reynolds: "It's wrong to say that India is being offered something different to what we have with the US, EU, Canada or Japan... this is the Tories & Reform unable to accept that this govt has done what they couldn't do... this is a great deal for the UK."

Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺

164,060 次观看 • 1 年前

“This is the first moment of common sense & reality that we’ve had from the judiciary on women’s rights. We have the Australian Human Rights Commission determined to push gender ideology onto citizens… But this judge has said, ‘oh remember women & lesbians also have rights.”

“This is the first moment of common sense & reality that we’ve had from the judiciary on women’s rights. We have the Australian Human Rights Commission determined to push gender ideology onto citizens… But this judge has said, ‘oh remember women & lesbians also have rights.”

Sall Grover

34,746 次观看 • 2 个月前

Another message to girls: once a man is wearing that costume, he doesn’t just get to take your rights. He can take away your safety. He can hurt you. If he does hurt you, he’ll have a fanatical group of people around him, trying to ensure that he’s protected and that HIS rights (AS A WOMAN) aren’t violated.

Another message to girls: once a man is wearing that costume, he doesn’t just get to take your rights. He can take away your safety. He can hurt you. If he does hurt you, he’ll have a fanatical group of people around him, trying to ensure that he’s protected and that HIS rights (AS A WOMAN) aren’t violated.

Staci Bryant

15,195 次观看 • 10 个月前

“God does not say, ‘hey, if that feeling that you have that is not in congruence with scripture—whether it’s homosexual desire or a desire to have sex with someone outside of marriage—is strong enough, then you can just go ahead and do it.’ He asks us to do really difficult things. He asks us to pick up a cross—a fork of execution—and to carry it.”

“God does not say, ‘hey, if that feeling that you have that is not in congruence with scripture—whether it’s homosexual desire or a desire to have sex with someone outside of marriage—is strong enough, then you can just go ahead and do it.’ He asks us to do really difficult things. He asks us to pick up a cross—a fork of execution—and to carry it.”

Natalie Jean Beisner

63,431 次观看 • 8 个月前

“I’m not opposed to a human rights commission that is apolitical, ensuring legislation is working & every citizens rights are being considered. But that is not what is happening. The AHRC is a gender ideology commission using taxpayer money to force the ideology upon citizens.”

“I’m not opposed to a human rights commission that is apolitical, ensuring legislation is working & every citizens rights are being considered. But that is not what is happening. The AHRC is a gender ideology commission using taxpayer money to force the ideology upon citizens.”

Sall Grover

16,415 次观看 • 2 个月前

It seems that Jessica has been caught by a masked woman. Is there anything that she can do to get out of the situation?

It seems that Jessica has been caught by a masked woman. Is there anything that she can do to get out of the situation?

MADGLAD (Doin Coms)

37,799 次观看 • 1 年前

Khanna: Vance was so emotional about this.. why can't he just say the person should apologize before being reconsidered. What is the hesitancy for him to say it? Is it political that he doesn't want to offend a base? What is it that that he can't say that?

Khanna: Vance was so emotional about this.. why can't he just say the person should apologize before being reconsidered. What is the hesitancy for him to say it? Is it political that he doesn't want to offend a base? What is it that that he can't say that?

Acyn

541,670 次观看 • 1 年前

A Filmmaker has dared to tell the story of a man falsely accused of Rape & what a false accusation like that can do to strongest of a man It is now upon us especially ones who know what this pain is, to make it a success Do watch #Bandar this weekend 🙏

A Filmmaker has dared to tell the story of a man falsely accused of Rape & what a false accusation like that can do to strongest of a man It is now upon us especially ones who know what this pain is, to make it a success Do watch #Bandar this weekend 🙏

Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj

12,235 次观看 • 1 个月前

“The sex discrimination commissioner is in the awkward position of having to argue that a man is not only a woman but that men can be lesbians if they say so. As painful as it has been for me being put through this, I can’t fathom the agony of having to make those arguments.”

“The sex discrimination commissioner is in the awkward position of having to argue that a man is not only a woman but that men can be lesbians if they say so. As painful as it has been for me being put through this, I can’t fathom the agony of having to make those arguments.”

Sall Grover

92,105 次观看 • 11 个月前

Do you agree with Republican Liz Cheney that we are "sleepwalking into a dictatorship? Cheney says of Trump: "He's told us what he will do. It's very easy to see the steps that he will take. … People who say, 'Well, if he's elected, it's not that dangerous because we have all of these checks and balances,' don't fully understand the extent to which the Republicans in Congress today have been co-opted. … One of the things that we see happening today is a sort of a sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States." "If you look at what Donald Trump is trying to do, he can't do it by himself. He has to have collaborators. And the story of Mike Johnson is a story of, of a collaborator and of someone who knew then – and knows now – that what he's doing and saying is wrong, but he's willing to do it in an effort to please Donald Trump. And that's what makes it dangerous."

Do you agree with Republican Liz Cheney that we are "sleepwalking into a dictatorship? Cheney says of Trump: "He's told us what he will do. It's very easy to see the steps that he will take. … People who say, 'Well, if he's elected, it's not that dangerous because we have all of these checks and balances,' don't fully understand the extent to which the Republicans in Congress today have been co-opted. … One of the things that we see happening today is a sort of a sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States." "If you look at what Donald Trump is trying to do, he can't do it by himself. He has to have collaborators. And the story of Mike Johnson is a story of, of a collaborator and of someone who knew then – and knows now – that what he's doing and saying is wrong, but he's willing to do it in an effort to please Donald Trump. And that's what makes it dangerous."

Brian Krassenstein

1,140,083 次观看 • 2 年前

Really, just what does this stupid woman think that she is going to do to that man? She is lucky that she never caught a tightie. Why embarrass yourself like this? If the uncivilised savage wants to push in the line, let him. He will get what is coming to him one day. This is Namibia.

Really, just what does this stupid woman think that she is going to do to that man? She is lucky that she never caught a tightie. Why embarrass yourself like this? If the uncivilised savage wants to push in the line, let him. He will get what is coming to him one day. This is Namibia.

Pookie's Polls & Opinions

17,564 次观看 • 3 个月前

This woman reportedly poured hot water on a small boy. Reports indicate that he has been subjected to prolonged maltreatment. We are calling on the police and human rights authorities to ensure that justice is served.

This woman reportedly poured hot water on a small boy. Reports indicate that he has been subjected to prolonged maltreatment. We are calling on the police and human rights authorities to ensure that justice is served.

Kingsley Uchenna

71,678 次观看 • 22 天前

“But I do want to place on record that we don't accept many of these submissions and in particular the one worrying thing that we see is what the medical reports disclose is that Mr Suliman Carrim has not been hospitalized continuously since April he tends to get hospitalised just as his appearances before this commission are scheduled and that is worrying” Madlanga Commission evidence leader Adv Matthew Chaskalson The hearing of Suliman Carrim's Evidence before the Madlanga Commission has been postponed to 15 July

“But I do want to place on record that we don't accept many of these submissions and in particular the one worrying thing that we see is what the medical reports disclose is that Mr Suliman Carrim has not been hospitalized continuously since April he tends to get hospitalised just as his appearances before this commission are scheduled and that is worrying” Madlanga Commission evidence leader Adv Matthew Chaskalson The hearing of Suliman Carrim's Evidence before the Madlanga Commission has been postponed to 15 July

News Live SA

32,952 次观看 • 11 天前

Aussies warned about questioning climate change The Australian Human Rights Commission, in a stunning reversal of its core mission, is now calling for the government to regulate what citizens say about climate change. Their justification? Combating "misinformation." This immediately begs the question: Who becomes the arbiter of truth? The same establishment with a long track record of failed apocalyptic predictions? From "permanent droughts" that never came to pass, to deadlines for coastal nations being "wiped out" that expired decades ago, the alarmist narrative has been consistently wrong. Now, the proposed solution to this credibility gap isn't debate or better science—it's silence. The Commission admits censorship can "erode trust," yet demands "swift and decisive" action to stifle dissent anyway. This is a fundamental betrayal. A Human Rights Commission should be the guardian of free expression—the right to question, to disagree, and to challenge the powerful. It is the bedrock of a free society. The lesson here is global: The most dangerous "misinformation" is the idea that you can protect human rights by dismantling them first.

Aussies warned about questioning climate change The Australian Human Rights Commission, in a stunning reversal of its core mission, is now calling for the government to regulate what citizens say about climate change. Their justification? Combating "misinformation." This immediately begs the question: Who becomes the arbiter of truth? The same establishment with a long track record of failed apocalyptic predictions? From "permanent droughts" that never came to pass, to deadlines for coastal nations being "wiped out" that expired decades ago, the alarmist narrative has been consistently wrong. Now, the proposed solution to this credibility gap isn't debate or better science—it's silence. The Commission admits censorship can "erode trust," yet demands "swift and decisive" action to stifle dissent anyway. This is a fundamental betrayal. A Human Rights Commission should be the guardian of free expression—the right to question, to disagree, and to challenge the powerful. It is the bedrock of a free society. The lesson here is global: The most dangerous "misinformation" is the idea that you can protect human rights by dismantling them first.

Camus

30,657 次观看 • 9 个月前

TikTok question: “When I say to them that they don't have a women's experience (that being a woman is so much more than a costume) they say "no women has the same experience" what can I say to that?”

TikTok question: “When I say to them that they don't have a women's experience (that being a woman is so much more than a costume) they say "no women has the same experience" what can I say to that?”

Amy E. Sousa, MA Depth Psychology

11,492 次观看 • 6 个月前

“The moment you have legislation that says you have to accept a man as a woman [etc] your freedom of speech belief & association is violated. That’s the actual human rights abuse” Full clip by Brett Cooper + a great piece on The Girl Spot gym nightmare:

“The moment you have legislation that says you have to accept a man as a woman [etc] your freedom of speech belief & association is violated. That’s the actual human rights abuse” Full clip by Brett Cooper + a great piece on The Girl Spot gym nightmare:

Sall Grover

91,287 次观看 • 1 年前

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Sall Grover

33,164 次观看 • 1 年前