Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This remote viewer just warned that the real purpose of data centers is even darker than you think. “They’re utilizing AI right now to program our subconscious.” It’s MKUltra mind control on steroids. “They’re surveilling us.” “They’re collecting data on us.” But Elizabeth April warns they’re also being used...

166,040 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

The Pragmatic Engineer

39,073 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“The Grey aliens appear to be engineering a human-alien hybrid species.” “They look just like us.” “But they retain telepathic capabilities.” “They can control us.” “The end game of the abduction program is planetary conquest by stealth.” Timothy Alberino just broke down the best evidence for what’s really going on with alien abductions. And it’s even more terrifying than you might think: “One of the most alarming things about [David Jacobs’] final book, Walking Among Us, is he documents that … the Greys have been trying to perfect a hybrid.” “As the years progressed … you were getting more refined hybrids that looked more and more like us.” “They’re so advanced that … they’re indistinguishable from us.” “And their allegiance is to the Greys, not to human beings.” “What’s really alarming is that these hybrids, according to Jacobs, are psychopaths.” “David Jacobs said that the end game of the abduction program was … the Greys integrate themselves into our civilization, and it’s a conquest by stealth.” “I think that elements of the United States government are aware of this.” “Karla Turner was always talking about the fact that some of these abductees would be abducted by Grey aliens, and then when they were returned … the military would show up.” “Turner’s husband was abducted by elements of the military.” “They think they were brought onto Air Force bases, in some cases underground bases.” “And they were interrogated in regard to what was happening on the alien vessel.” Alberino is persuaded that the “Greada contract was real.” Jesse Michels: “This is this Eisenhower agreement.” “In exchange for some tactical advantage … we would let the aliens do medical experiments across the United States population.” “I don’t know, but if you look at the data, it seems like abductions ramped up around that time.” Then, Alberino suspects that “panic ensued” once the military started to realize what the Greys were doing. “And the abduction phenomenon is exponential.” “Because it’s hereditary.” Michels: “Eisenhower’s granddaughter is an abductee, and is all over this issue.” “Laura.” Alberino: “If your parents were abductees, or one of your parents, then you’re also an abductee.” “I found no exception to that rule.” “I interact with a lot of abductees.” “They’re being abducted and integrated into this breeding program forcibly.” “The men are having the sperm taken, the women are having ova taken.” “Then, the Greys create an artificial womb.” “These women carry these hybrid fetuses for about three months right before they start to show.” “Then they’re abducted, and the fetuses are taken out and put in gestation tanks.” Timothy Alberino Jesse Michels Laura Eisenhower

Holden Culotta

176,345 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

Deutsch Explains

72,475 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

James Cameron & Arnold Schwarzenegger on people becoming slaves to machines: "Cameron: People always ask me, “Do you think the machines will ever win? You think the machines will ever beat us?” I say, “They beat us a long time ago.” Just look around when you’re in a public place and how many people are riveted to their phone. We’re already slaves of the machines created by people in Silicon Valley to get rich, to tap into human behavior. And now nobody is complete without their cell phone. I mean something that we couldn’t even imagine thirty or forty years ago, we can’t imagine not having it with us. It’s become a part of us. I actually think we’re co-evolving with our machines. We’re changing. Schwarzenegger: I think people are now glued to the machines. I mean through the iPhones or mobile phones in general, iPads and whatever it is. Every second there’s new news out there or new information. In the old days, the routine was to get up in the morning, coffee, get the newspaper. You read the newspaper. Your favorite section of news, sports. Cameron: Our kids would not even understand what that was. The kids are blank slates. They’re just adapting, they’re co-evolving with the machines. We’re so willing to give away all of our powers, all of the things that we used to do, all of our skills and everything, to a machine to do for us, that if you just progressed that out over time, we might give them everything to do. And then what’s left for us? What’s left for us to be human? Schwarzenegger: I think this is a challenge of the new generation. It’s not the challenge for me because I still love to drive. I like to do all this stuff myself. I come from the old school, but I think the newer generation, you’re absolutely right. It is a big challenge, and what do we develop because of that? They’re becoming vegetables in some ways. I don’t know." ("James Cameron's Story of Science Fiction", 2018) Clip From: Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) Director: James Cameron P.S: Happy 72nd birthday, James Cameron!

DepressedBergman

16,742 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen