正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This Time Andhra Podcaster Coming With All CAG Data! CAG Data కూడా పేటీఎం అని ఇప్పుడు అనండి. Sales Tax -2.28% State Excise Duty - 7.69% States Own Tax Revenues - 1.97% Debt - 10.60% Capital Expenditure - 0.06%

𝐍𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐘𝐒𝐉 𝐕𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐠

29,703 subscribers

10,891 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Andhra Podcaster Is Back With All Data And Proofs On Borrowings! సిబిఎన్ ప్రెసెంట్ చేసింది వైట్ పేపర్ కాదు BLACK PAPER! డేటా అండ్ ఆధారాలతో వైసిపి లేవనెత్తిన నిజాలు ఇవే! కూటమి ప్రభుత్వం ఎలాంటి CAG/RBI ఆధారాలు లేకుండా 9.74 లక్షల కోట్ల అప్పు అని చెప్తోంది. కానీ రికార్డుల ప్రకారం మార్చి 2024 నాటికి ఉన్నది ₹6.46 లక్షల కోట్లు. అందులో జగన్ హయాంలో చేసింది ₹3.31 లక్షల కోట్లు మాత్రమే. రెండేళ్ల కూటమి పాలనలోనే ఏకంగా ₹3,53,700 కోట్ల అప్పులు. 15వ ఫైనాన్స్ కమిషన్ లిమిట్ కంటే ₹15,300 కోట్లు ఎక్కువ అప్పు చేశారు. CAG లెక్కల ప్రకారం డెట్‌లో క్యాపిటల్ ఎక్స్‌పెండిచర్ వైసిపి టైమ్‌లో 33.24% ఉంటే ఇప్పుడు 26.45%కి పడిపోయింది. వైసిపి ప్రతీ డేటా పాయింట్‌కి CAG/RBI సోర్సెస్ చూపిస్తే. కూటమి ప్రభుత్వం సోర్స్ లేని బొగస్ నంబర్లతో బ్రెయిన్ వాషింగ్ చేస్తోంది.

Andhra Podcaster Is Back With All Data And Proofs On Borrowings! సిబిఎన్ ప్రెసెంట్ చేసింది వైట్ పేపర్ కాదు BLACK PAPER! డేటా అండ్ ఆధారాలతో వైసిపి లేవనెత్తిన నిజాలు ఇవే! కూటమి ప్రభుత్వం ఎలాంటి CAG/RBI ఆధారాలు లేకుండా 9.74 లక్షల కోట్ల అప్పు అని చెప్తోంది. కానీ రికార్డుల ప్రకారం మార్చి 2024 నాటికి ఉన్నది ₹6.46 లక్షల కోట్లు. అందులో జగన్ హయాంలో చేసింది ₹3.31 లక్షల కోట్లు మాత్రమే. రెండేళ్ల కూటమి పాలనలోనే ఏకంగా ₹3,53,700 కోట్ల అప్పులు. 15వ ఫైనాన్స్ కమిషన్ లిమిట్ కంటే ₹15,300 కోట్లు ఎక్కువ అప్పు చేశారు. CAG లెక్కల ప్రకారం డెట్‌లో క్యాపిటల్ ఎక్స్‌పెండిచర్ వైసిపి టైమ్‌లో 33.24% ఉంటే ఇప్పుడు 26.45%కి పడిపోయింది. వైసిపి ప్రతీ డేటా పాయింట్‌కి CAG/RBI సోర్సెస్ చూపిస్తే. కూటమి ప్రభుత్వం సోర్స్ లేని బొగస్ నంబర్లతో బ్రెయిన్ వాషింగ్ చేస్తోంది.

𝐍𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐘𝐒𝐉 𝐕𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐠

16,001 次观看 • 14 天前

Georgia audited its own data center tax breaks and found that the state gave up $474 million in sales taxes in one year—and got back just $41 million from the industry. At least 38 states have deals like this. (It's not clear whether all that money the state waived was needed to attract the construction: in Georgia's case, by the state's own estimate, 70% of the data center construction would have happened anyway.)

Georgia audited its own data center tax breaks and found that the state gave up $474 million in sales taxes in one year—and got back just $41 million from the industry. At least 38 states have deals like this. (It's not clear whether all that money the state waived was needed to attract the construction: in Georgia's case, by the state's own estimate, 70% of the data center construction would have happened anyway.)

Ronan Farrow

542,852 次观看 • 4 天前

New data shows that under Democrats Zohran Mamdani and Kathy Hochul, New York now has the highest taxes in the nation When you add together the total tax burden for each state. That's income tax, property tax, sales, and excise tax as a share of total income: - New York topped that list with a tax burden of 12.5% - Hawaii ranked second at 12.3% - Maine is 3rd - Vermont is 4th - Connecticut is 5th - New Jersey is 6th Every one of these states is run by Democrat control. (Vermont is the exception with a Republican governor but the state is run by a Democrat majority legislator) Alaska had the lowest tax burden at just 5%. Also near the bottom was Tennessee at number 47, Florida at number 46, both with burdens around 6%

New data shows that under Democrats Zohran Mamdani and Kathy Hochul, New York now has the highest taxes in the nation When you add together the total tax burden for each state. That's income tax, property tax, sales, and excise tax as a share of total income: - New York topped that list with a tax burden of 12.5% - Hawaii ranked second at 12.3% - Maine is 3rd - Vermont is 4th - Connecticut is 5th - New Jersey is 6th Every one of these states is run by Democrat control. (Vermont is the exception with a Republican governor but the state is run by a Democrat majority legislator) Alaska had the lowest tax burden at just 5%. Also near the bottom was Tennessee at number 47, Florida at number 46, both with burdens around 6%

Wall Street Apes

276,121 次观看 • 4 个月前

If you want to see an AI agent work the worst job on the planet, watch as Numeral’s tax agent navigates a state sales tax portal. Every time you remit sales tax, you basically have to navigate portals like this. I say “like this” because there are 50 states and 190+ countries, so of course no two are the same. Thankfully, it all boils down to a bunch of data entry and confusing rules to interpret and follow. So to an AI agent (like Numeral’s), it’s a breeze. But still, even fancy Cisco hold music can’t save how annoying this is. And if you’re a founder, you have to do this hundreds of times. Thanks to our team for making this happen; I wouldn’t wish this task on my worst enemy! (h/t and Paul Klein IV - we use BrowserBase under the hood to run this, and couldn’t imagine it any other way)

If you want to see an AI agent work the worst job on the planet, watch as Numeral’s tax agent navigates a state sales tax portal. Every time you remit sales tax, you basically have to navigate portals like this. I say “like this” because there are 50 states and 190+ countries, so of course no two are the same. Thankfully, it all boils down to a bunch of data entry and confusing rules to interpret and follow. So to an AI agent (like Numeral’s), it’s a breeze. But still, even fancy Cisco hold music can’t save how annoying this is. And if you’re a founder, you have to do this hundreds of times. Thanks to our team for making this happen; I wouldn’t wish this task on my worst enemy! (h/t and Paul Klein IV - we use BrowserBase under the hood to run this, and couldn’t imagine it any other way)

Sam Ross

10,593 次观看 • 11 个月前

Elon just got Mississippi to pay for his $20 billion AI data center. And the state thinks they WON. This is funny, let me explain: xAI announced a massive data center in Southaven, Mississippi. Governor Tate Reeves called it "the largest private investment in state history." $20 billion. Hundreds of jobs. Economic transformation. Except Mississippi isn't getting $20 billion. They're GIVING Elon $2-3 billion in tax breaks. The fine print: Under Mississippi's 2024 data center law, xAI pays ZERO sales tax on equipment, ZERO corporate income tax, ZERO franchise tax. xAI is buying $15-18 billion in computing hardware. Mississippi sales tax is 7%. That's $1+ billion waived just on equipment purchases. Add corporate tax exemptions over the next decade and you're looking at $2-3 billion in total giveaways. For a state with a $7 billion annual budget. What Mississippi actually gets: "Hundreds of permanent jobs" (no specific number). "Thousands of indirect jobs" (construction work that ends when building is done). Tax revenue from... wait, they exempted all the taxes. So the only money coming in is property tax and income tax from a few hundred employees. In a state that already has super low tax rates. The timeline makes it obvious this was already done: Announced January 8th. Operations begin February. Three weeks from announcement to launch? They bought and retrofitted an 800,000 sq ft building BEFORE telling anyone. This wasn't a negotiation. It was a press conference for a done deal. Mississippi Development Authority said xAI "didn't ask for special treatment." Because Mississippi already created a law giving data centers everything they want. xAI just exploited it at the biggest scale yet. The name is perfect: MACROHARDRR. Opposite of Microsoft. Elon trademarked it last year. He's building a $20 billion troll to Microsoft funded by Mississippi taxpayers. What actually happens: xAI operates tax-free for a decade. Builds the world's most powerful AI supercomputer. Generates billions in revenue. Pays Mississippi nothing. Meanwhile Mississippi schools and hospitals stay underfunded. When locals complain about environmental impact, xAI points to the jobs they created. Perfect closed loop. Every other state is watching this. "If Mississippi can give away billions in taxes and call it economic development, why can't we?" Race to the bottom starts now. Elon just proved the playbook: Raise $20 billion, find a desperate state, get them to waive all taxes, build your infrastructure for free, own it forever, profit tax-free. All while media calls it "investment." It's not investment IN Mississippi. It's extraction FROM Mississippi. Mississippi gave Elon a $20 billion playground and didn't charge admission. He gets the world's most powerful AI infrastructure. They get a press release and construction jobs. Biggest corporate giveaway in modern history or genius economic development... Next 5 years will tell us. But one thing is for sure: Elon's smart as f*ck for this.

Elon just got Mississippi to pay for his $20 billion AI data center. And the state thinks they WON. This is funny, let me explain: xAI announced a massive data center in Southaven, Mississippi. Governor Tate Reeves called it "the largest private investment in state history." $20 billion. Hundreds of jobs. Economic transformation. Except Mississippi isn't getting $20 billion. They're GIVING Elon $2-3 billion in tax breaks. The fine print: Under Mississippi's 2024 data center law, xAI pays ZERO sales tax on equipment, ZERO corporate income tax, ZERO franchise tax. xAI is buying $15-18 billion in computing hardware. Mississippi sales tax is 7%. That's $1+ billion waived just on equipment purchases. Add corporate tax exemptions over the next decade and you're looking at $2-3 billion in total giveaways. For a state with a $7 billion annual budget. What Mississippi actually gets: "Hundreds of permanent jobs" (no specific number). "Thousands of indirect jobs" (construction work that ends when building is done). Tax revenue from... wait, they exempted all the taxes. So the only money coming in is property tax and income tax from a few hundred employees. In a state that already has super low tax rates. The timeline makes it obvious this was already done: Announced January 8th. Operations begin February. Three weeks from announcement to launch? They bought and retrofitted an 800,000 sq ft building BEFORE telling anyone. This wasn't a negotiation. It was a press conference for a done deal. Mississippi Development Authority said xAI "didn't ask for special treatment." Because Mississippi already created a law giving data centers everything they want. xAI just exploited it at the biggest scale yet. The name is perfect: MACROHARDRR. Opposite of Microsoft. Elon trademarked it last year. He's building a $20 billion troll to Microsoft funded by Mississippi taxpayers. What actually happens: xAI operates tax-free for a decade. Builds the world's most powerful AI supercomputer. Generates billions in revenue. Pays Mississippi nothing. Meanwhile Mississippi schools and hospitals stay underfunded. When locals complain about environmental impact, xAI points to the jobs they created. Perfect closed loop. Every other state is watching this. "If Mississippi can give away billions in taxes and call it economic development, why can't we?" Race to the bottom starts now. Elon just proved the playbook: Raise $20 billion, find a desperate state, get them to waive all taxes, build your infrastructure for free, own it forever, profit tax-free. All while media calls it "investment." It's not investment IN Mississippi. It's extraction FROM Mississippi. Mississippi gave Elon a $20 billion playground and didn't charge admission. He gets the world's most powerful AI infrastructure. They get a press release and construction jobs. Biggest corporate giveaway in modern history or genius economic development... Next 5 years will tell us. But one thing is for sure: Elon's smart as f*ck for this.

Ricardo

41,539 次观看 • 7 个月前

These are the 5 worst states for retirees financially: - Number 5, California, they tax your entire 401k withdrawal, $100,000 in distributions, $8,000 bucks straight to Sacramento. And if you own a home at the median price, which is now above $900,000 bucks, property tax is nearly $9,000. On top of that, not to mention it's the only state to fully tax military retirement benefits. - Number 4, New York, they give a $40,000 exclusion for married couples. Sounds decent, but — the other$60 grand gets taxed, add on 8.25% sales tax. And if you live in the city, add an additional extra city income tax because why not - Number 3, Jersey highest property tax in the country with the average bill just hitting $10,000. But they do offer retirement income exclusion up to a $100,000. The only catch total income has to stay below $150 grand, cross that threshold by even a dollar and say hello to $6,500 bucks of new taxes - Number 2, Connecticut property taxes. Third highest nationally at $7,700 a year on a $400,000 home, but they are phasing in full retirement income exemption. That hits a hundred percent in 2026. They're the only state on this list actually getting better. They're not there yet, and I blame Greenwich - Number 1, Illinois. Yes, they exempt all retirement income, zero state tax on your 401k. but property tax is second highest nationally and in Chicago the sales tax is 10.25%

These are the 5 worst states for retirees financially: - Number 5, California, they tax your entire 401k withdrawal, $100,000 in distributions, $8,000 bucks straight to Sacramento. And if you own a home at the median price, which is now above $900,000 bucks, property tax is nearly $9,000. On top of that, not to mention it's the only state to fully tax military retirement benefits. - Number 4, New York, they give a $40,000 exclusion for married couples. Sounds decent, but — the other$60 grand gets taxed, add on 8.25% sales tax. And if you live in the city, add an additional extra city income tax because why not - Number 3, Jersey highest property tax in the country with the average bill just hitting $10,000. But they do offer retirement income exclusion up to a $100,000. The only catch total income has to stay below $150 grand, cross that threshold by even a dollar and say hello to $6,500 bucks of new taxes - Number 2, Connecticut property taxes. Third highest nationally at $7,700 a year on a $400,000 home, but they are phasing in full retirement income exemption. That hits a hundred percent in 2026. They're the only state on this list actually getting better. They're not there yet, and I blame Greenwich - Number 1, Illinois. Yes, they exempt all retirement income, zero state tax on your 401k. but property tax is second highest nationally and in Chicago the sales tax is 10.25%

Wall Street Apes

206,331 次观看 • 5 个月前

🗣️ Just saw this on .FOX Business “EXIT TAX” 😳plastered over a mountain of cash. The caption says it all: “They’re gonna tax you with a knife in your back when you leave, too.” 😱 And it’s not just talk. Across the country, at least 10 states are now exploring or have already pushed wealth taxes and “exit taxes” to punish residents who dare to flee their high-tax, high-spending disasters for lower-tax states like Florida, Texas, or Tennessee. Leading the pack: 1. California — “Billionaire Tax Act” (5% one-time hit on net worth over $1 billion) 2. New York Wealth and high-income tax proposals, plus aggressive residency audits on departing residents. 3. Washington Recently passed 9.9% tax on incomes over $1M; earlier capital gains tax. 4. Michigan Ballot proposal for 5%+ tax on high earners (over $500K); constitutional amendment efforts. 5.Massachusetts Millionaire surtax already in place; additional wealth/exit ideas under discussion. 6. Connecticut Wealth tax proposals and high-income surcharges. 7. Illinois — Debating 3% tax on income over $1M. 8. New Jersey — Has existing withholding rules on real estate sales for former residents (often called an exit mechanism). 9. Maryland — High-income and capital gains adjustments; history of targeting departing wealthy residents. 10. Hawaii or others in the broader group — Part of earlier coordinated wealth tax pushes (some reports fold in states like these for ongoing discussions). ✅ …plus others quietly lining up. Some proposals include “look-back” rules so they can keep taxing your worldwide assets even after you move out. This isn’t about “fairness.” It’s about governments that refuse to cut wasteful spending, so instead they try to trap the golden geese who actually pay the bills.

🗣️ Just saw this on .FOX Business “EXIT TAX” 😳plastered over a mountain of cash. The caption says it all: “They’re gonna tax you with a knife in your back when you leave, too.” 😱 And it’s not just talk. Across the country, at least 10 states are now exploring or have already pushed wealth taxes and “exit taxes” to punish residents who dare to flee their high-tax, high-spending disasters for lower-tax states like Florida, Texas, or Tennessee. Leading the pack: 1. California — “Billionaire Tax Act” (5% one-time hit on net worth over $1 billion) 2. New York Wealth and high-income tax proposals, plus aggressive residency audits on departing residents. 3. Washington Recently passed 9.9% tax on incomes over $1M; earlier capital gains tax. 4. Michigan Ballot proposal for 5%+ tax on high earners (over $500K); constitutional amendment efforts. 5.Massachusetts Millionaire surtax already in place; additional wealth/exit ideas under discussion. 6. Connecticut Wealth tax proposals and high-income surcharges. 7. Illinois — Debating 3% tax on income over $1M. 8. New Jersey — Has existing withholding rules on real estate sales for former residents (often called an exit mechanism). 9. Maryland — High-income and capital gains adjustments; history of targeting departing wealthy residents. 10. Hawaii or others in the broader group — Part of earlier coordinated wealth tax pushes (some reports fold in states like these for ongoing discussions). ✅ …plus others quietly lining up. Some proposals include “look-back” rules so they can keep taxing your worldwide assets even after you move out. This isn’t about “fairness.” It’s about governments that refuse to cut wasteful spending, so instead they try to trap the golden geese who actually pay the bills.

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

20,383 次观看 • 4 个月前

On 4th of July Independence Day everyone should be aware of this Donald Trump exposed on Joe Rogan the only reason we’re still paying an income tax in America is because US Politicians are paid off by foreign countries You should be furious. It’s time to Abolish the IRS and set Americans free. We are not free if we are forced to pay an income tax “In the early 1900, they switched over stupidly to an income tax. And you know why? Because countries were putting a lot of pressure on America. We don't wanna pay tariffs. Believe me, they control our politicians. If you look at the kind of numbers that these guys make then and now” We are all literally paying an income tax because US Politicians are taking bribes from foreign counties to enrich themselves It’s time to abolish the IRS There are roughly 97 distinct taxes and fees we are already expected to pay with income that’s already being taxed Here are just some ways the government steals your money: If you earn it, income tax If you live somewhere, property tax If you spend it, sales tax If you save it, inflation tax If you invest it, capital gains tax If you start a business, licenses If you own a good business, profit tax If you give it away, gift tax If you die, inheritance tax

On 4th of July Independence Day everyone should be aware of this Donald Trump exposed on Joe Rogan the only reason we’re still paying an income tax in America is because US Politicians are paid off by foreign countries You should be furious. It’s time to Abolish the IRS and set Americans free. We are not free if we are forced to pay an income tax “In the early 1900, they switched over stupidly to an income tax. And you know why? Because countries were putting a lot of pressure on America. We don't wanna pay tariffs. Believe me, they control our politicians. If you look at the kind of numbers that these guys make then and now” We are all literally paying an income tax because US Politicians are taking bribes from foreign counties to enrich themselves It’s time to abolish the IRS There are roughly 97 distinct taxes and fees we are already expected to pay with income that’s already being taxed Here are just some ways the government steals your money: If you earn it, income tax If you live somewhere, property tax If you spend it, sales tax If you save it, inflation tax If you invest it, capital gains tax If you start a business, licenses If you own a good business, profit tax If you give it away, gift tax If you die, inheritance tax

Wall Street Apes

183,770 次观看 • 1 个月前

Months ago I went on Nick’s Right Podcast to talk about H-1B abuse. Even back then, the evidence of tax-payer funded labor trafficking was surfacing. Now it’s gotten to the point where all state agencies need to cross reference their active contracts with LCA data - because there is a lot that isn’t making sense. How did we double our IT Staffing contract spend in 6 years and why are we importing visa workers and sponsoring green cards on the tax payer’s bill? Greg Abbott Attorney General Ken Paxton it’s time to actually get serious about this - no more half-measures. Comptroller Don Huffines your attention is needed on this.

Months ago I went on Nick’s Right Podcast to talk about H-1B abuse. Even back then, the evidence of tax-payer funded labor trafficking was surfacing. Now it’s gotten to the point where all state agencies need to cross reference their active contracts with LCA data - because there is a lot that isn’t making sense. How did we double our IT Staffing contract spend in 6 years and why are we importing visa workers and sponsoring green cards on the tax payer’s bill? Greg Abbott Attorney General Ken Paxton it’s time to actually get serious about this - no more half-measures. Comptroller Don Huffines your attention is needed on this.

Nick Plumb

10,656 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 FLORIDA IS ABSOLUTELY BOOMING... And the Blue States are LOSING BIG TIME High-income Americans are flooding into the Sunshine State. IRS data shows $20.6 BILLION in migration income pouring into Florida. Not just bodies, it's wealthy, productive people bringing their money and businesses with them. Post-COVID exodus from failing blue cities + new tech wave = major companies and titans like Peter Thiel, Ken Griffin, and Mark Zuckerberg all piling in. Griffin even dropping money into charter schools so Florida kids get top-tier education. Power moves creating a domino effect: IPOs, investments, development, turning South Florida into a powerhouse. One in 40 people in Florida moved there from another state in 2024 alone. Low taxes. No state income tax. Pro-business. Safe. Strong leadership. This is what winning looks like. Blue states like California and Illinois keep bleeding people and cash while Florida keeps stacking wins.

🚨 FLORIDA IS ABSOLUTELY BOOMING... And the Blue States are LOSING BIG TIME High-income Americans are flooding into the Sunshine State. IRS data shows $20.6 BILLION in migration income pouring into Florida. Not just bodies, it's wealthy, productive people bringing their money and businesses with them. Post-COVID exodus from failing blue cities + new tech wave = major companies and titans like Peter Thiel, Ken Griffin, and Mark Zuckerberg all piling in. Griffin even dropping money into charter schools so Florida kids get top-tier education. Power moves creating a domino effect: IPOs, investments, development, turning South Florida into a powerhouse. One in 40 people in Florida moved there from another state in 2024 alone. Low taxes. No state income tax. Pro-business. Safe. Strong leadership. This is what winning looks like. Blue states like California and Illinois keep bleeding people and cash while Florida keeps stacking wins.

Gunther Eagleman™

38,385 次观看 • 2 个月前

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 次观看 • 7 个月前

Yesterday I was opportune to be part of a Town Hall event organised by Channels Television anchored by SeunOkin Channels tv to discuss the Tax Reform Bills currently before the national assembly. The bills have seen significant opposition coming from some northern leaders and the NGF, especially on the issue of VAT revenue sharing among the states with many calling for the bills to be withdrawn by the President on account of this singular issue. Personally, I feel that part of the opposition from the bills stems from ignorance of the actual provisions contained in them or misconception of some aspects of the bill. However, when we look at the amount of VAT revenue that is triggering this whole haggling, you'll realise how precarious our revenue situation is. A dispassionate look at the data is essential to guide our positions on the necessity of these tax reforms. By the end of 2024, we may hit a record VAT collection of N6 trillion but that's just around $3.5 billion. In many states, their share of VAT revenue from FAAC in a year is bigger than their entire IGR! How on earth do you develop with such a revenue profile? This shows clearly that we need to reorganise and re-engineer our finances for optimum performance. This is what these bills seek to do. Although, increasing revenue collection is actually one of the intentions of these reforms but it is not the MAJOR reason. The major aim is to remove all the cogs and bottlenecks that affect growth and profitability of businesses in Nigeria by reducing their tax burden and exempting the small businesses from paying income tax. The vast majority of Nigerians who are poor would also be exempt from paying income tax. We're talking about 90% of Nigerians here! In other climes, any piece of legislation that brings overall tax relief to low income earners is always a popular bill with massive support. It is therefore bizarre that some persons are up in arms in Nigeria to oppose this kind of landmark legislation and they claim they're fighting for the masses. Data and logic should guide our positions and not sentiments or mischievous ignorance. Any reservations held by any individual or group about any section of the bills should be presented to the NASS during the public hearings and not calling for the withdrawal of the bills. Let's be serious in this country please.

Michael Chibuzo®

16,022 次观看 • 1 年前

The United States Is A Corporation. American History Your Were NEVER Told “It was all masterfully planned and executed. During the Civil War, the Constitutional Republic abandoned Congress, which forced President Lincoln to issue martial law. At this time, the Republic was taken over by foreign insurgents who replaced it with the United States of America, Inc. in all caps in 1871. A corporation that had the same name. The United States. ‌ What better way to replace it without anyone noticing that they just got turned into a business and commercialized? Now, this corporation was later purchased by the banking powers behind the Fed in 1912. The Fed was created in 1913. Why did this happen? Well, the US was bankrupt. When we sold the United States to foreign banking cartels, if you will, salvage liens were placed on every asset. Check this out. Including the people of the new federalized states. Now let's fast forward to 1933. Income tax was placed on the people to pay these foreign bankers who own the IMF, which owns the IRS. Look into what the IRS actually is. Who is the IMF owned by? You gotta follow the money. Who funds it? It's the same people that own the United States, Inc. Same few families, and they're not American. So when I say foreign insurgents, that's what I mean. ‌ So 1933, USA, Inc. It was bankrupt. ‌ An income tax is placed on its people. In other words, you and I were turned into property. Look it up, we were turned into cattle, and we were collateralized in order to turn us, humans, flesh and blood, into a means of paying off a massive debt. But the problem is, is that while you are technically a person, you've entered into contracts that you're completely unaware of, such as your birth certificate, social security number, et cetera that are all saying I consent to being collateralized, you're living as property, as opposed to living as a blood and flesh natural being ‌ On paper, you are property, you are a corporation right now. You might be hearing this and thinking, we're fucked. We're property, are you kidding me? And that's true, and property doesn't have rights. But here is both the blessing and the curse. There are multiple of you. Just like there's multiple United States of Americas, sleight of hand, remember? What hat do they wanna wear? ‌ There are multiple of you. The insane irony in all of this is the fact that they are actually now liable for all of your alleged obligations, aka debts. That's what a debt means. You can play a wrong move in chess and still win the game. And commerce is chess. Their greatest attempt to set us back, actually, is their greatest weakness. How can we owe debt if the United States is liable for all of its property? ‌ If we're its property, then it's the United States' burden to pay our debt and that is exactly what the law says. I'm going to leave you guys with two different codes that I highly recommend you look into first is going to be the House Joint Resolution Act 192. & when that occurred, the dollar was turned into what is called Federal Reserve debt notes. If we're being asked to pay debts, but all we are given from the system is debt notes, AKA fiat money to pay back those debts. How can we pay a debt with a debt? I just want you to sit with that. They never gave you lawful money ‌ They never gave you gold. They never gave you silver. The other side of it is looking into 18 USC 818 United States code 8. You're going to come to find out that that's literally telling you that the United States is liable for all debt, all of your debt. The United States is liable for it. How can you pay a debt with debt notes? Don't let that go over your head. They already got paid. Whoever's coming after you saying you a debt, whatever. They already got paid. Why would you be paying it twice? Common law, a completely different higher level set of law that comes from God, the Creator is for a natural blood and flesh man. & yet you have been following legal law your entire life.”

The United States Is A Corporation. American History Your Were NEVER Told “It was all masterfully planned and executed. During the Civil War, the Constitutional Republic abandoned Congress, which forced President Lincoln to issue martial law. At this time, the Republic was taken over by foreign insurgents who replaced it with the United States of America, Inc. in all caps in 1871. A corporation that had the same name. The United States. ‌ What better way to replace it without anyone noticing that they just got turned into a business and commercialized? Now, this corporation was later purchased by the banking powers behind the Fed in 1912. The Fed was created in 1913. Why did this happen? Well, the US was bankrupt. When we sold the United States to foreign banking cartels, if you will, salvage liens were placed on every asset. Check this out. Including the people of the new federalized states. Now let's fast forward to 1933. Income tax was placed on the people to pay these foreign bankers who own the IMF, which owns the IRS. Look into what the IRS actually is. Who is the IMF owned by? You gotta follow the money. Who funds it? It's the same people that own the United States, Inc. Same few families, and they're not American. So when I say foreign insurgents, that's what I mean. ‌ So 1933, USA, Inc. It was bankrupt. ‌ An income tax is placed on its people. In other words, you and I were turned into property. Look it up, we were turned into cattle, and we were collateralized in order to turn us, humans, flesh and blood, into a means of paying off a massive debt. But the problem is, is that while you are technically a person, you've entered into contracts that you're completely unaware of, such as your birth certificate, social security number, et cetera that are all saying I consent to being collateralized, you're living as property, as opposed to living as a blood and flesh natural being ‌ On paper, you are property, you are a corporation right now. You might be hearing this and thinking, we're fucked. We're property, are you kidding me? And that's true, and property doesn't have rights. But here is both the blessing and the curse. There are multiple of you. Just like there's multiple United States of Americas, sleight of hand, remember? What hat do they wanna wear? ‌ There are multiple of you. The insane irony in all of this is the fact that they are actually now liable for all of your alleged obligations, aka debts. That's what a debt means. You can play a wrong move in chess and still win the game. And commerce is chess. Their greatest attempt to set us back, actually, is their greatest weakness. How can we owe debt if the United States is liable for all of its property? ‌ If we're its property, then it's the United States' burden to pay our debt and that is exactly what the law says. I'm going to leave you guys with two different codes that I highly recommend you look into first is going to be the House Joint Resolution Act 192. & when that occurred, the dollar was turned into what is called Federal Reserve debt notes. If we're being asked to pay debts, but all we are given from the system is debt notes, AKA fiat money to pay back those debts. How can we pay a debt with a debt? I just want you to sit with that. They never gave you lawful money ‌ They never gave you gold. They never gave you silver. The other side of it is looking into 18 USC 818 United States code 8. You're going to come to find out that that's literally telling you that the United States is liable for all debt, all of your debt. The United States is liable for it. How can you pay a debt with debt notes? Don't let that go over your head. They already got paid. Whoever's coming after you saying you a debt, whatever. They already got paid. Why would you be paying it twice? Common law, a completely different higher level set of law that comes from God, the Creator is for a natural blood and flesh man. & yet you have been following legal law your entire life.”

Wall Street Apes

631,624 次观看 • 3 年前

I went to the local Drag Queen Storytime, so you didn't have to. I wanted to see who was putting on the event & funding it. I met Eli from Parasol Patrol & Clark from the Arvada Center. Clark claims that this was funded by the Arvada Center Non-profit & NOT tax dollars. However, that's not entirely true. They DO receive public funds via tax dollars! The Arvada Center for the Arts & Humanities (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit in Arvada, Colorado) receives public funds. Its primary public funding sources include: •Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD): This is a voter-approved regional sales tax district (0.1% tax) across seven Colorado counties that distributes public tax dollars to arts, culture, and science organizations. The Arvada Center is a Tier II SCFD-funded organization and has received major funding from it—for example, about 9% of its revenue in FY24. It actively supports SCFD reauthorization and is listed among SCFD’s funded partners. •City of Arvada: The Center has a longstanding public partnership with the City of Arvada (it originated as a city-supported initiative). The city is explicitly listed among its key supporters on the Center’s website, alongside SCFD. Historical records and position descriptions reference ongoing relationships and city involvement. The Center’s own website highlights these public supporters (with logos for SCFD and the City of Arvada) and notes that, as a nonprofit, it also relies on private philanthropic donations, ticket sales, sponsorships, and other earned revenue. It maintains a grant writer on staff and has received or been eligible for various grants over time (though it has stated it is not currently receiving direct National Endowment for the Arts funding). Financial filings (e.g., Form 990 data via ProPublica) show “contributions” (which include grants from public and private sources), making up a significant portion of revenue, alongside program service revenue. In short, while the Center depends on a mix of public and private support, it clearly receives public funds through SCFD (tax-supported) and the City of Arvada.

I went to the local Drag Queen Storytime, so you didn't have to. I wanted to see who was putting on the event & funding it. I met Eli from Parasol Patrol & Clark from the Arvada Center. Clark claims that this was funded by the Arvada Center Non-profit & NOT tax dollars. However, that's not entirely true. They DO receive public funds via tax dollars! The Arvada Center for the Arts & Humanities (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit in Arvada, Colorado) receives public funds. Its primary public funding sources include: •Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD): This is a voter-approved regional sales tax district (0.1% tax) across seven Colorado counties that distributes public tax dollars to arts, culture, and science organizations. The Arvada Center is a Tier II SCFD-funded organization and has received major funding from it—for example, about 9% of its revenue in FY24. It actively supports SCFD reauthorization and is listed among SCFD’s funded partners. •City of Arvada: The Center has a longstanding public partnership with the City of Arvada (it originated as a city-supported initiative). The city is explicitly listed among its key supporters on the Center’s website, alongside SCFD. Historical records and position descriptions reference ongoing relationships and city involvement. The Center’s own website highlights these public supporters (with logos for SCFD and the City of Arvada) and notes that, as a nonprofit, it also relies on private philanthropic donations, ticket sales, sponsorships, and other earned revenue. It maintains a grant writer on staff and has received or been eligible for various grants over time (though it has stated it is not currently receiving direct National Endowment for the Arts funding). Financial filings (e.g., Form 990 data via ProPublica) show “contributions” (which include grants from public and private sources), making up a significant portion of revenue, alongside program service revenue. In short, while the Center depends on a mix of public and private support, it clearly receives public funds through SCFD (tax-supported) and the City of Arvada.

Break The Chains Media

19,357 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jim Cramer just went on Mad Money and told investors to stay away from Nebius and that alone might be the strongest buy signal of the week (Save this). "Nebius is at the nexus of the craziness right now," Cramer said. "This stock is not done going down. There will be another time to buy it, but that time is not now." If you were waiting for one more confirmation, this week handed you several and the fundamentals moved the opposite direction from the stock price. Job postings in Singapore for Data Center Project Development, Site Selection & Colocation and Technical Due Diligence show Nebius actively scouting a new market, following similar signals in Wales and India within the same four day window. Job postings are a leading indicator that typically show up before a formal data center announcement, not after. Now here is the actual fundamental news from this week and it matters. Nebius announced a brand new business model, asset light infrastructure partnerships. Instead of financing every data center itself, outside partners will finance, own and operate the physical facilities. Nebius supplies the systems architecture, hardware design, software stack and its global sales organization. This is the same playbook major cloud providers and chipmakers have used for years, outsource the capital heavy physical layer, keep the high margin design and customer relationship layer. This directly addresses Nebius's biggest historical risk, the capital intensity of building GPU data centers fast enough to keep pace with demand. Nebius has already signed initial partnership deals under the new structure, meaning capacity can now scale globally without spending its own capital on land, steel, and power. None of this guarantees the stock stops falling in the short term, momentum is negative and the stock sits roughly 40% below its June all time high. The stock may keep falling but the thesis just got stronger and I am buying the company Nebius is becoming. Extremely bullish on Nebius and make sure to follow me Melvin for more underrated gems.

Melvin

27,692 次观看 • 1 个月前

.david friedberg: “A wealth tax takes away private property. If you give the government the ability to do that on even 1% of net worth for billionaires, the next step is 5% of the billionaires, or maybe 2% of millionaires, and then maybe it’s 3% on people that have a net worth of 100 grand a year. And by the way, to figure out how much you have, what your assets are, you’ve got to send me a list every year of everything you own. So now the government gets to look into your house, not just see what’s in your bank account, what stocks you own, but what cars do you own? What’s the value of those cars? How much is that art worth? What’s everything here worth? Private property rights go out the window when you institute a wealth tax. Because now the government has the right to assess all your value and to take anything they want from you based on a vote where a bunch of people raise their hand and say, we’ll increase the tax rate to this—5%, 2%, 10%, whatever it is—and here’s the threshold, and we’ll take it every year. And when you do that, it eventually leads to 51% of people voting to take everything from 49%. That’s the worst case. That’s the end state of this. It eats itself, and that’s socialism. And so I think that a wealth tax—and look, it’s not going to affect me, this California tax. So don’t think that I’m trying to speak my book or whatever the comments or bullshit are. I think this is a fundamental, principled issue. By degrading private property rights, we are setting a precedent in the United States that is the foundation of why the United States was set up in the first place, which is for all of us that came to this country to get away from tyrannical governments outside the United States that took all our shit and controlled everything and told us what to do all the time. And we came here and we get to have private property. Sure, I’ll pay my tax. Here’s my 53%. Thank you very much, government, for all the great stuff you do, for all the services you provide. But now, f*ck off and leave me alone. And that’s not the case anymore when this passes. Bernie Sanders, Ro Khanna, all these national politicians, AOC, Elizabeth Warren—they’re all saying we need to have a national wealth tax now. So it’s not just in California. This is going to be the issue between 2026 and 2028. The elites are the billionaires and the tech people. They’re coming after them. And the manifestation of that is to create this wealth tax. And that gives the government the system by which private property rights are gone. And the United States has a very questionable future at that point. That’s the thing I worry about the most. And I juxtapose that with my optimism about the future and this amazing shit. I mean, think about it—this amazing shit that’s happening in the world. We’re going to have free f*cking energy. We’re going to live forever. We’re going to have all of this insane stuff that we never imagined. Abundance and resources that we could never contemplate. Happiness. Spending time with family. Working less hours. Robots that build shit for us. Everything is going to get better. Everything is getting better. Everything is getting more amazing. And then we’re like, let’s f*ck ourselves. Why not? Because we’ll just f*ck ourselves.”

.david friedberg: “A wealth tax takes away private property. If you give the government the ability to do that on even 1% of net worth for billionaires, the next step is 5% of the billionaires, or maybe 2% of millionaires, and then maybe it’s 3% on people that have a net worth of 100 grand a year. And by the way, to figure out how much you have, what your assets are, you’ve got to send me a list every year of everything you own. So now the government gets to look into your house, not just see what’s in your bank account, what stocks you own, but what cars do you own? What’s the value of those cars? How much is that art worth? What’s everything here worth? Private property rights go out the window when you institute a wealth tax. Because now the government has the right to assess all your value and to take anything they want from you based on a vote where a bunch of people raise their hand and say, we’ll increase the tax rate to this—5%, 2%, 10%, whatever it is—and here’s the threshold, and we’ll take it every year. And when you do that, it eventually leads to 51% of people voting to take everything from 49%. That’s the worst case. That’s the end state of this. It eats itself, and that’s socialism. And so I think that a wealth tax—and look, it’s not going to affect me, this California tax. So don’t think that I’m trying to speak my book or whatever the comments or bullshit are. I think this is a fundamental, principled issue. By degrading private property rights, we are setting a precedent in the United States that is the foundation of why the United States was set up in the first place, which is for all of us that came to this country to get away from tyrannical governments outside the United States that took all our shit and controlled everything and told us what to do all the time. And we came here and we get to have private property. Sure, I’ll pay my tax. Here’s my 53%. Thank you very much, government, for all the great stuff you do, for all the services you provide. But now, fck off and leave me alone. And that’s not the case anymore when this passes. Bernie Sanders, Ro Khanna, all these national politicians, AOC, Elizabeth Warren—they’re all saying we need to have a national wealth tax now. So it’s not just in California. This is going to be the issue between 2026 and 2028. The elites are the billionaires and the tech people. They’re coming after them. And the manifestation of that is to create this wealth tax. And that gives the government the system by which private property rights are gone. And the United States has a very questionable future at that point. That’s the thing I worry about the most. And I juxtapose that with my optimism about the future and this amazing shit. I mean, think about it—this amazing shit that’s happening in the world. We’re going to have free fcking energy. We’re going to live forever. We’re going to have all of this insane stuff that we never imagined. Abundance and resources that we could never contemplate. Happiness. Spending time with family. Working less hours. Robots that build shit for us. Everything is going to get better. Everything is getting better. Everything is getting more amazing. And then we’re like, let’s fck ourselves. Why not? Because we’ll just fck ourselves.”

Arjun Khemani

49,324 次观看 • 4 个月前

Tucker Carlson says Flock Cameras will being “The slave state” This is the building of the surveillance state He calls out the founded of Flock, “Here is the founder of Flock Safety describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project:” Founder “Terroristic organizations like Deflock, primary motivation is chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else.” Tucker Carlson says he’s on side of Deflock, he believes “They're an invasion of your privacy. They're dehumanizing” They’re funded by taxpayer money, so he’s a smug billionaire calling us all terrorists for being worried about surveillance while at the same time only being rich because our tax money The good news is, cities are responding to public outrage over this unlawful surveillance Dozens of cities and towns across the United States have pulled out of or even declined to renew contracts with Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader cameras due to public pushback, privacy concerns and data-sharing issues. I’ll go over a few at the end of the video You have to keep being loud and not accept unlawful surveillance 82+ communities across 28 states have terminated contracts or deactivated cameras since early 2025

Tucker Carlson says Flock Cameras will being “The slave state” This is the building of the surveillance state He calls out the founded of Flock, “Here is the founder of Flock Safety describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project:” Founder “Terroristic organizations like Deflock, primary motivation is chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else.” Tucker Carlson says he’s on side of Deflock, he believes “They're an invasion of your privacy. They're dehumanizing” They’re funded by taxpayer money, so he’s a smug billionaire calling us all terrorists for being worried about surveillance while at the same time only being rich because our tax money The good news is, cities are responding to public outrage over this unlawful surveillance Dozens of cities and towns across the United States have pulled out of or even declined to renew contracts with Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader cameras due to public pushback, privacy concerns and data-sharing issues. I’ll go over a few at the end of the video You have to keep being loud and not accept unlawful surveillance 82+ communities across 28 states have terminated contracts or deactivated cameras since early 2025

Wall Street Apes

68,487 次观看 • 1 个月前

When people say things like ‘Why are people worried about wealth taxes that will never affect them’ it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how the economy works and why even people who aren’t rich, don’t want wealth taxes. Wealthy people like it or not, are amongst the most economically productive people in our country, the top 1% of earners contribute 30% of our income tax receipts. The top 1% are responsible for approx 340,000 jobs in the economy etc. Wealthy people are also best placed to restructure their tax affairs to avoid wealth taxes and the most geographically mobile in our country, leaving for them is as easy as rearranging dates in their calendar. There is a wealth of comparative data from other countries showing wealth taxes are economically damaging, difficult to implement, expensive to administer and never raise the levels of taxes promised. There is no country in world that has ever raised anywhere near the £25 billion cited as the potential amounts that would be raised from an annual wealth tax. If the wealthy leave that impacts our tax base, which inevitably means that everyone else who isn’t wealthy, has to pay more tax. If they leave they will shift their strategic focus and capital to wherever they go, which means that money that would otherwise would have been invested in the UK will go elsewhere. This is precisely why other countries like Italy have tax regimes specially designed to incentivise wealthy people to come, they understand that having wealthy people is great for tax receipts, job creation and economic growth. It’s very disingenuous to assume the reason why people don’t support wealth taxes is because they believe they will one day be in the 1%. They don’t support wealth taxes for the most part because they understand they simply do not work. Zack Polanski is a dangerous man who isn’t even clear in his own mind why we need wealth taxes. His commitment to wealth taxes is ideological rather than evidence based. In the interview he explains that there’s a lot of the wealth in the city of London yet at the same time maintains that wealth taxes aren’t needed for raising tax revenues but are principally for reducing wealth inequality. So you mean to tell me the goal is the force some of the most economically productive people to leave so that we can all be poorer collectively but be more equal? In a country where 53% of households take more out of the state in benefits than they put in, what do you think will happen to the tax burden for working /middle class people if the top 1% leave or restructure their tax affairs in such as way that reduces their exposure to the UK. We are already at a post world war high when it comes to the tax burden and we are in real time seeing the damage it is doing to business and investor confidence in the UK economy. Yet you somehow think that levying even more taxes will have no impact on ordinary people?

When people say things like ‘Why are people worried about wealth taxes that will never affect them’ it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how the economy works and why even people who aren’t rich, don’t want wealth taxes. Wealthy people like it or not, are amongst the most economically productive people in our country, the top 1% of earners contribute 30% of our income tax receipts. The top 1% are responsible for approx 340,000 jobs in the economy etc. Wealthy people are also best placed to restructure their tax affairs to avoid wealth taxes and the most geographically mobile in our country, leaving for them is as easy as rearranging dates in their calendar. There is a wealth of comparative data from other countries showing wealth taxes are economically damaging, difficult to implement, expensive to administer and never raise the levels of taxes promised. There is no country in world that has ever raised anywhere near the £25 billion cited as the potential amounts that would be raised from an annual wealth tax. If the wealthy leave that impacts our tax base, which inevitably means that everyone else who isn’t wealthy, has to pay more tax. If they leave they will shift their strategic focus and capital to wherever they go, which means that money that would otherwise would have been invested in the UK will go elsewhere. This is precisely why other countries like Italy have tax regimes specially designed to incentivise wealthy people to come, they understand that having wealthy people is great for tax receipts, job creation and economic growth. It’s very disingenuous to assume the reason why people don’t support wealth taxes is because they believe they will one day be in the 1%. They don’t support wealth taxes for the most part because they understand they simply do not work. Zack Polanski is a dangerous man who isn’t even clear in his own mind why we need wealth taxes. His commitment to wealth taxes is ideological rather than evidence based. In the interview he explains that there’s a lot of the wealth in the city of London yet at the same time maintains that wealth taxes aren’t needed for raising tax revenues but are principally for reducing wealth inequality. So you mean to tell me the goal is the force some of the most economically productive people to leave so that we can all be poorer collectively but be more equal? In a country where 53% of households take more out of the state in benefits than they put in, what do you think will happen to the tax burden for working /middle class people if the top 1% leave or restructure their tax affairs in such as way that reduces their exposure to the UK. We are already at a post world war high when it comes to the tax burden and we are in real time seeing the damage it is doing to business and investor confidence in the UK economy. Yet you somehow think that levying even more taxes will have no impact on ordinary people?

D 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

86,441 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨ALL-IN INTERVIEW: Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley joins @jason ! All-In Interview Series is brought to you by: AppLovin & Numeral Garrett Langley covers: -- The Real Price of Safety vs. Privacy -- Why People Are Cutting the Cameras Down -- Who Really Gets Your License Plate Data -- The Tool That Got 9 Cops Fired -- Drones That Beat Cops to the Scene -- The AI He Refuses to Build (0:00) The most controversial company in privacy right now, Flock CEO joins the show! (7:23) License plate data retention: 7 days solves 90% of crimes (13:00) Camera vandalism, felony charges, and privacy concerns (18:15) Dirty cops exposed: Flock's audit tool got 9 Georgia officers fired (28:25) AI, drones, facial recognition, and avoiding predictive policing (39:43) Safety is a privilege and who actually needs Flock (45:36) Flock’s PR crisis: internal morale, churn, and 20 cities turning the cameras back on ---------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partners for making this possible! AppLovin Ads is AppLovin's AI advertising platform reaching over a billion daily active users across mobile games. Full-screen video ads with a 35-second median watch time. Advertisers are profitably spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day. AppLovin Ads is now open to all advertisers. Sign up at Numeral is the trusted solution for U.S. sales tax, VAT, and GST, used by 3,000+ businesses globally. They handle registrations, filings, and tax rates, so you can stay ahead of risk. Learn more at

🚨ALL-IN INTERVIEW: Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley joins @jason ! All-In Interview Series is brought to you by: AppLovin & Numeral Garrett Langley covers: -- The Real Price of Safety vs. Privacy -- Why People Are Cutting the Cameras Down -- Who Really Gets Your License Plate Data -- The Tool That Got 9 Cops Fired -- Drones That Beat Cops to the Scene -- The AI He Refuses to Build (0:00) The most controversial company in privacy right now, Flock CEO joins the show! (7:23) License plate data retention: 7 days solves 90% of crimes (13:00) Camera vandalism, felony charges, and privacy concerns (18:15) Dirty cops exposed: Flock's audit tool got 9 Georgia officers fired (28:25) AI, drones, facial recognition, and avoiding predictive policing (39:43) Safety is a privilege and who actually needs Flock (45:36) Flock’s PR crisis: internal morale, churn, and 20 cities turning the cameras back on ---------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partners for making this possible! AppLovin Ads is AppLovin's AI advertising platform reaching over a billion daily active users across mobile games. Full-screen video ads with a 35-second median watch time. Advertisers are profitably spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day. AppLovin Ads is now open to all advertisers. Sign up at Numeral is the trusted solution for U.S. sales tax, VAT, and GST, used by 3,000+ businesses globally. They handle registrations, filings, and tax rates, so you can stay ahead of risk. Learn more at

The All-In Podcast

155,353 次观看 • 14 天前