Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This traffic stop was one bad decision away from being over in five minutes. Naturally, he chose the other option. A 20-year-old driver was pulled over for an excessively loud exhaust. Officers then spotted a nicotine vape and ordered him out of the pickup. He refused. Again. And again....

314,032 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 35

Фото профиля HowlingRetard Holocaust
HowlingRetard Holocaust1 месяц назад

That cop is a complete faggot. If you think this is a good thing you're a moron.

Фото профиля Drduce
Drduce1 месяц назад

Cant have nicotine at 20 but he can be sent to war. Thats messed up

Фото профиля Matters
Matters1 месяц назад

@HistorianUSA1 Searching his car over a nic vape, no wonder these kids hate cops.

Фото профиля Ultra Hoosier
Ultra Hoosier1 месяц назад

This is crazy. I’m w kid. I would not be upset if my son did this. This was ridiculous

Фото профиля KINGOFTHEFARM
KINGOFTHEFARM1 месяц назад

These cops are such capital Douche bags He’s 20… old enough to go into the military and die for the country… take his vape, Write him a ticket, and fuck off. This isn’t communist, Russia, or Nazi Germany We have to start pushing back

Фото профиля Only malinois
Only malinois1 месяц назад

Seriously over a tobacco vape? That’s fucking unreal.

Фото профиля Independent
Independent1 месяц назад

Turning innocent people into hardened criminals with a sheet

Фото профиля GOD WE NEED YOU NOW
GOD WE NEED YOU NOW1 месяц назад

In what state is nicotine illegal to possess under 21?

Фото профиля J
J1 месяц назад

This cop was just looking for shit to pinch the kid for smh, I’m all for abiding the law but he seemed to be jealous of his truck

Фото профиля Stephen Patrick
Stephen Patrick1 месяц назад

This cop is a complete faggot. The kid is too nieve to understand that this cop is not his friend, one bit. Every question is trying to get him in trouble or tied up.

Фото профиля Someguyspoasts
Someguyspoasts1 месяц назад

He's lucky the cop didn't draw down on him. When they start bullshitting like that, a lot of times they might pull a gun.

Фото профиля Polska Wódka
Polska Wódka1 месяц назад

Underage nicotine is not probable cause to search entire vehicle

Фото профиля Jimmy Richardson
Jimmy Richardson1 месяц назад

Dumbest White boy ever! that is literally the coolest cop you’re ever gonna fucking get, and this white boy is a fucking idiot who thinks he knows something. He must’ve watched half a Judge Judy and thinks he’s a lawyer now, lol, fucking retard.

Фото профиля TheBetting_Golfer
TheBetting_Golfer1 месяц назад

Fuck the police dude. The notion that we need them is one of the biggest psy ops out there. The police are here to serve and protect us….. which they don’t do.. Literally all the cop had to do is take the vape and write citation for it. Literally took him to jail because he didn’t want to give up his constitutional right. It’s ridiculous that possession of a vape is probable cause to a search.

Фото профиля shin
shin1 месяц назад

This interaction & being arrested over a nicotine vape??

Фото профиля Jeff Rogers
Jeff Rogers1 месяц назад

He can ask him to step out because of PennVSmims but he can’t search his vehicle without PC of something other than Nicotine can he, Or am I missing something somebody?

Фото профиля Nick
Nick1 месяц назад

Does this cop really think he’s gonna stop this 20 year-old from ever smoking nicotine again?

Фото профиля Chris
Chris1 месяц назад

He is 20 years old. I looked up the age to have nicotine. You could be 18 to 21 years old.

Фото профиля Kenneth Bartlett 🌟🌟🌟
Kenneth Bartlett 🌟🌟🌟1 месяц назад

Another tyrant cop you can go die from a factory, but I can’t have nicotine. It’s not even a cigarette. It’s a fricking. Vape

Фото профиля Ryan B
Ryan B1 месяц назад

I’m usually on the police side buuuuut this is wild. It’s not that serious

Фото профиля Anthony
Anthony1 месяц назад

@johnbryanesq that cannot possibly be probable cause to search his vehicle

Фото профиля Hi-Tech Red-Nech
Hi-Tech Red-Nech1 месяц назад

@grok does the vape give probably cause for the officer to search the vehicle?

Фото профиля George Combs
George Combs1 месяц назад

20yo can’t have nicotine? What???

Фото профиля RVT
RVT1 месяц назад

When it's a colored person it's " he should just obey the officer " when it's a white person " the cop should be fired , he had no reason to arrest him for not listening " 😆 🤣 the Ole classic racist American thinking

Фото профиля Iceberg Slim
Iceberg Slim1 месяц назад

Just get out of the truck, say you don’t consent to any searches…..take care of the rest at court

Фото профиля Russini’s Side Dish
Russini’s Side Dish1 месяц назад

Can fight a war but not smoke a cigarettes or vape! lol! Our government is retarded

Фото профиля G
G1 месяц назад

This is bullshit nicotine is not probable cause to search the vehicle. It’s not a DUI.

Фото профиля Danny Mullins
Danny Mullins1 месяц назад

The cop did this shit on purpose, he knows exactly how to escalate any situation he wants to get charges on somebody smh. Pos

Фото профиля JR 🦇
JR 🦇1 месяц назад

All this for something that doesn’t alter the mental state and harms only the user. Meanwhile, the government can force kids to die at 17-18 but they can’t enjoy a smoke or a drink of alcohol

Фото профиля Gingergurl69 (Krustycrab not panties)
Gingergurl69 (Krustycrab not panties)1 месяц назад

I think this wussy cop needs to man up and go find criminals instead of 20 year olds with a damn vape.

Фото профиля christian
christian1 месяц назад

Such bullshit by this cop. Trying to play the cool guy but he was really just trying to catch this kid with something with no real suspicion. Kid was not swerving, slurring, under any influence. This is what trains young people to not like the police.

Фото профиля Satoshi
Satoshi1 месяц назад

I get its small potatoes but This cop did a wonderful job. The kid shouldn’t have had it or hid it better knowing the law. It was an educational event and the cop did an exceptional job as his duty’s.

Фото профиля matthew
matthew1 месяц назад

@grok is it illegal to possess nicotine products under the age of 21. Does a cop have the right to search a vehicle if they find a 20-year-old in possession of nicotine products

Фото профиля Jason Schumacher
Jason Schumacher1 месяц назад

This cop is an absolute piece of shit. Seriously.

Фото профиля Don Jaunito
Don Jaunito1 месяц назад

If you’re gonna argue w an armed government agent, you should know about PA v Mimms 😆. If you think you’re right, don’t beat the ride, beat the case in court 🤦🏻‍♂️

Похожие видео

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Gannon

194,555 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Albuquerque, New Mexico — Police received a call from an employee at a gas station who said a vehicle had been parked at the gas pump for several hours. The caller said the vehicle was not running, and she could barely see the driver because of the dark, tinted windows. She asked for officers to check on the driver. Officers arrived and ran the license plate and determined the registered owner of the car was Keshawn Thomas. Officers discovered the driver, later confirmed to be Thomas, was asleep in the driver’s seat of the vehicle. Officers noticed alcohol, including an open container, inside the vehicle. They determined that since the vehicle was not running, they did not have charges for drunk driving. Officers decided they would tell Thomas he needed to have someone come and pick up the car. They woke Thomas and asked him to exit the vehicle and take a seat. They told Thomas not to start the car and told him he was not in trouble. Thomas exited the vehicle but declined to sit down. An officer asked Thomas what he was doing with open containers in the car and pointed out he was drunk, and had been passed out for several hours. Officers later told investigators that they detected signs of intoxication during the encounter. An officer told him he should not be driving drunk because he could hurt himself or others. Thomas and officers argued with each other, and as the conversation became more heated, an additional officer was requested for assistance. Thomas sat in the driver’s seat of his vehicle with the door open and appeared to be searching the interior of the car. Officers directed him to get his phone and exit the vehicle. After about 30 second, one of the officers called out that Thomas had a gun. All three officers fired their handguns, striking Thomas. He died at the scene.

Damon Strong

138,080 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A routine traffic stop quickly escalated after a driver refused to provide identification and actively resisted officers. ​The entire encounter—from the initial tailgating violation to the final arrest—was captured on bodycam footage. ​ The officer initiated the stop after Joe reportedly followed her squad car at an unsafe distance while constantly honking his horn and flashing his lights. ​Throughout the encounter, Joe was extremely confrontational, aggressive, and uncooperative: ​He repeatedly used profanity and hurled derogatory insults at the officer. ​He refused to identify himself or provide his driver's license. ​He instructed his young child, who was a passenger in the vehicle, to get out and scream for help. ​He claimed that the officer was the one breaking the law by using her cell phone while driving. ​When a backup officer (a supervisor) arrived on the scene, Joe continued his combative behavior. He argued that honking his horn was not illegal and demanded to know what specific law he had broken. ​When the officers attempted to place Joe under arrest, he actively resisted. He refused to exit his vehicle, screamed that the officers were choking him (which the video evidence contradicts), and had to be physically removed and secured in the back of the police cruiser. Joe's actions during the traffic stop led to several specific criminal charges: ​1. Following Too Closely / Unlawful Use of a Horn ​The initial reason for the stop was a traffic violation. Under most state traffic laws (including Wisconsin, where this incident took place), drivers must maintain a safe following distance. Furthermore, vehicle horns are legally intended only to warn of immediate danger, not to harass or signal displeasure. Joe's continuous honking and tailgating constituted a valid reason for a traffic stop. ​2. Refusal to Identify / Provide a License ​While Joe correctly noted that citizens do not always have to identify themselves to police, traffic stops are a major exception. When operating a motor vehicle, a driver is legally required to present a valid driver's license upon the request of a law enforcement officer. Refusing to do so is a secondary offense and prevents the officer from issuing a standard citation. ​3. Resisting and Obstructing an Officer ​Joe was charged with resisting/obstructing an officer. Legally, "obstructing" includes knowingly giving false information or refusing to comply with lawful commands (such as refusing to sign a ticket or show ID). "Resisting" applies to his physical non-compliance when officers ordered him out of the vehicle and his subsequent physical struggle against being handcuffed and placed in the squad car. ​4. Disorderly Conduct ​Joe's loud, profane screaming in a public space, combined with triggering a disruptive situation by forcing his child to scream for help, falls under disorderly conduct. This charge applies to behavior that is violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, or otherwise unreasonably disruptive. ​5. Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer ​During the physical struggle to place Joe under arrest, his actions escalated to physical resistance that resulted in a charge of battery to a law enforcement officer. This is a felony charge in many jurisdictions, applying when an individual intentionally causes bodily harm (or takes actions likely to cause harm) to an officer acting in their official capacity.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

16,503 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад