正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This traffic stop was one bad decision away from being over in five minutes. Naturally, he chose the other option. A 20-year-old driver was pulled over for an excessively loud exhaust. Officers then spotted a nicotine vape and ordered him out of the pickup. He refused. Again. And again....

272,052 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

193,913 次观看 • 2 个月前

Albuquerque, New Mexico — Police received a call from an employee at a gas station who said a vehicle had been parked at the gas pump for several hours. The caller said the vehicle was not running, and she could barely see the driver because of the dark, tinted windows. She asked for officers to check on the driver. Officers arrived and ran the license plate and determined the registered owner of the car was Keshawn Thomas. Officers discovered the driver, later confirmed to be Thomas, was asleep in the driver’s seat of the vehicle. Officers noticed alcohol, including an open container, inside the vehicle. They determined that since the vehicle was not running, they did not have charges for drunk driving. Officers decided they would tell Thomas he needed to have someone come and pick up the car. They woke Thomas and asked him to exit the vehicle and take a seat. They told Thomas not to start the car and told him he was not in trouble. Thomas exited the vehicle but declined to sit down. An officer asked Thomas what he was doing with open containers in the car and pointed out he was drunk, and had been passed out for several hours. Officers later told investigators that they detected signs of intoxication during the encounter. An officer told him he should not be driving drunk because he could hurt himself or others. Thomas and officers argued with each other, and as the conversation became more heated, an additional officer was requested for assistance. Thomas sat in the driver’s seat of his vehicle with the door open and appeared to be searching the interior of the car. Officers directed him to get his phone and exit the vehicle. After about 30 second, one of the officers called out that Thomas had a gun. All three officers fired their handguns, striking Thomas. He died at the scene.

Damon Strong

137,362 次观看 • 12 天前

A routine traffic stop quickly escalated after a driver refused to provide identification and actively resisted officers. ​The entire encounter—from the initial tailgating violation to the final arrest—was captured on bodycam footage. ​ The officer initiated the stop after Joe reportedly followed her squad car at an unsafe distance while constantly honking his horn and flashing his lights. ​Throughout the encounter, Joe was extremely confrontational, aggressive, and uncooperative: ​He repeatedly used profanity and hurled derogatory insults at the officer. ​He refused to identify himself or provide his driver's license. ​He instructed his young child, who was a passenger in the vehicle, to get out and scream for help. ​He claimed that the officer was the one breaking the law by using her cell phone while driving. ​When a backup officer (a supervisor) arrived on the scene, Joe continued his combative behavior. He argued that honking his horn was not illegal and demanded to know what specific law he had broken. ​When the officers attempted to place Joe under arrest, he actively resisted. He refused to exit his vehicle, screamed that the officers were choking him (which the video evidence contradicts), and had to be physically removed and secured in the back of the police cruiser. Joe's actions during the traffic stop led to several specific criminal charges: ​1. Following Too Closely / Unlawful Use of a Horn ​The initial reason for the stop was a traffic violation. Under most state traffic laws (including Wisconsin, where this incident took place), drivers must maintain a safe following distance. Furthermore, vehicle horns are legally intended only to warn of immediate danger, not to harass or signal displeasure. Joe's continuous honking and tailgating constituted a valid reason for a traffic stop. ​2. Refusal to Identify / Provide a License ​While Joe correctly noted that citizens do not always have to identify themselves to police, traffic stops are a major exception. When operating a motor vehicle, a driver is legally required to present a valid driver's license upon the request of a law enforcement officer. Refusing to do so is a secondary offense and prevents the officer from issuing a standard citation. ​3. Resisting and Obstructing an Officer ​Joe was charged with resisting/obstructing an officer. Legally, "obstructing" includes knowingly giving false information or refusing to comply with lawful commands (such as refusing to sign a ticket or show ID). "Resisting" applies to his physical non-compliance when officers ordered him out of the vehicle and his subsequent physical struggle against being handcuffed and placed in the squad car. ​4. Disorderly Conduct ​Joe's loud, profane screaming in a public space, combined with triggering a disruptive situation by forcing his child to scream for help, falls under disorderly conduct. This charge applies to behavior that is violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, or otherwise unreasonably disruptive. ​5. Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer ​During the physical struggle to place Joe under arrest, his actions escalated to physical resistance that resulted in a charge of battery to a law enforcement officer. This is a felony charge in many jurisdictions, applying when an individual intentionally causes bodily harm (or takes actions likely to cause harm) to an officer acting in their official capacity.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

16,503 次观看 • 2 个月前