Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This tweet breaks down the distinction between basic administration and revolutionary struggle, debunking the myth of the "Zuma Revolution" with the hard facts. Debunking the Zuma "Revolutionary" Myth. Jacob Zuma was not a revolutionary. We must distinguish between basic governance and revolutionary transformation. If you measure success by RDP...

AfricaisBlack's profile picture

Andile Gogoda

29,023 subscribers

39,764 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducationHealth & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Jacob Zuma, has proclaimed himself a revolutionary, but the success of his administration is often measured by conventional metrics such as building roads and schools. However, for a leader who claims to be a revolutionary and a leftist, the real test of his commitment to his efforts lies in his ability to solve the core problems of the struggle. The core of the South African struggle is the quest for equality and economic justice, which includes redistributing Land from the rich to the poor and changing the ownership of Mineral Resources. Zuma's administration should be judged by its progress in these areas, not just its infrastructure development plans. The ANC's 1992 promises were to return 30% of Land to people within five years of its rule, but since 1994, only 4 to 7% of Land has been returned to people in the 30 years of the ANC's rule, 10 of which were under Zuma's government. No matter how you try to change Zuma's legacy, the truth is clear: Zuma has failed miserably unless you admit that he is not the revolutionary you are portraying him to be.
1:56

Jacob Zuma, has proclaimed himself a revolutionary, but the success of his administration is often measured by conventional metrics such as building roads and schools. However, for a leader who claims to be a revolutionary and a leftist, the real test of his commitment to his efforts lies in his ability to solve the core problems of the struggle. The core of the South African struggle is the quest for equality and economic justice, which includes redistributing Land from the rich to the poor and changing the ownership of Mineral Resources. Zuma's administration should be judged by its progress in these areas, not just its infrastructure development plans. The ANC's 1992 promises were to return 30% of Land to people within five years of its rule, but since 1994, only 4 to 7% of Land has been returned to people in the 30 years of the ANC's rule, 10 of which were under Zuma's government. No matter how you try to change Zuma's legacy, the truth is clear: Zuma has failed miserably unless you admit that he is not the revolutionary you are portraying him to be.

Andile Gogoda

57,605 views • 1 year ago

Don’t be fooled by the political theater! The DA’s rollout of Home Affairs in banks isn't a reform, it is the completion of a project started by Jacob Zuma in April 2016. Zuma and Ramaphosa are two sides of the same neoliberal coin. 🇿🇦 While Zuma shouted about Radical Economic Transformation, he was busy merging the State Apparatus with Finance Capital. He stood with the CEOs of ABSA and Standard Bank to sell your birthright to the highest bidder. He didn't build state capacity, he hollowed it out. From Zuma to Ramaphosa, the ANC has acted as a managerial committee for the Bourgeoisie. They both chose to pay service fees to private banks rather than hire our millions of unemployed youth to build world-class Home Affairs offices in every township and village. We demand the Nationalization of Banks and a Public Sector that serves the people where they are.
2:39

Don’t be fooled by the political theater! The DA’s rollout of Home Affairs in banks isn't a reform, it is the completion of a project started by Jacob Zuma in April 2016. Zuma and Ramaphosa are two sides of the same neoliberal coin. 🇿🇦 While Zuma shouted about Radical Economic Transformation, he was busy merging the State Apparatus with Finance Capital. He stood with the CEOs of ABSA and Standard Bank to sell your birthright to the highest bidder. He didn't build state capacity, he hollowed it out. From Zuma to Ramaphosa, the ANC has acted as a managerial committee for the Bourgeoisie. They both chose to pay service fees to private banks rather than hire our millions of unemployed youth to build world-class Home Affairs offices in every township and village. We demand the Nationalization of Banks and a Public Sector that serves the people where they are.

Andile Gogoda

13,529 views • 4 months ago

“I can't be threatened by Zuma, no I defeated Zuma, Jacob Zuma thought he buried me, he expelled me from the ANC for comparing him with Thabo Mbeki. for saying there is a regime change which happened in Botswana. I was expelled from the ANC by Zuma and Ramaphosa was used as an instrument” EFF President Julius Malema “Jacob Zuma is inviting me back to fight with him and I'll do it and I will do it with ease , I'm not scared of Zuma or all of his people who are working with him, there's no way anyone is going to threaten the existence of the EFF and that person becomes a friend” Julius Sello Malema
1:20

“I can't be threatened by Zuma, no I defeated Zuma, Jacob Zuma thought he buried me, he expelled me from the ANC for comparing him with Thabo Mbeki. for saying there is a regime change which happened in Botswana. I was expelled from the ANC by Zuma and Ramaphosa was used as an instrument” EFF President Julius Malema “Jacob Zuma is inviting me back to fight with him and I'll do it and I will do it with ease , I'm not scared of Zuma or all of his people who are working with him, there's no way anyone is going to threaten the existence of the EFF and that person becomes a friend” Julius Sello Malema

News Live SA

1,034,643 views • 1 year ago

Adv Tembeka Ngcukaitobi: “We are asking for a non-custodial punishment, and no one can sensibly say that other forms of punishment do not constitute punishment...you have a range of penal options that would reflect the society’s disapproval.” This is quite interesting coming from Adv Ngcukaitobi. In 2021, during the Zondo Commission/Jacob Zuma ConCourt proceedings, Ngcukaitobi explicitly told the court that the two years imprisonment sought by the Zondo commission was a serious penalty that took into consideration Zuma’s seniority and political standing. He further said the court should consider Zuma’s influence in society and the public nature of his disobedience. And on the question of a suspended sentence, Ngcukaitobi was unambiguous: “The question really is how long Mr Zuma should go to prison for? That he should go to prison should be clear.” To reiterate, in the Julius Malema case today, Ngcukaitobi is arguing that a custodial sentence is not the only option, that there’s a range of penal options available and that imprisonment actually achieves the opposite of what society wants. Yet in the Zuma matter, his position was the exact reverse. He told that court that a fine was out of the question, and that imprisonment was a “clear, effective remedy.” He specifically argued that a suspended sentence was inappropriate for Zuma, and that the only real question was how long Zuma should go to prison, not whether he should. So, the same advocate who argued there was essentially one appropriate punishment, i.e. direct imprisonment for Zuma, is now criticising the prosecution for allegedly thinking there is only one punishment for Malema. In Zuma’s case, whom he stringently presented as a former head of state, defying the highest court in the land, Ngcukaitobi pushed for the harshest custodial outcome available, using Zuma’s status as an aggravating factor. In Malema’s case, he is now arguing that imprisonment is counterproductive and that a person’s status should be irrelevant.
0:34

Adv Tembeka Ngcukaitobi: “We are asking for a non-custodial punishment, and no one can sensibly say that other forms of punishment do not constitute punishment...you have a range of penal options that would reflect the society’s disapproval.” This is quite interesting coming from Adv Ngcukaitobi. In 2021, during the Zondo Commission/Jacob Zuma ConCourt proceedings, Ngcukaitobi explicitly told the court that the two years imprisonment sought by the Zondo commission was a serious penalty that took into consideration Zuma’s seniority and political standing. He further said the court should consider Zuma’s influence in society and the public nature of his disobedience. And on the question of a suspended sentence, Ngcukaitobi was unambiguous: “The question really is how long Mr Zuma should go to prison for? That he should go to prison should be clear.” To reiterate, in the Julius Malema case today, Ngcukaitobi is arguing that a custodial sentence is not the only option, that there’s a range of penal options available and that imprisonment actually achieves the opposite of what society wants. Yet in the Zuma matter, his position was the exact reverse. He told that court that a fine was out of the question, and that imprisonment was a “clear, effective remedy.” He specifically argued that a suspended sentence was inappropriate for Zuma, and that the only real question was how long Zuma should go to prison, not whether he should. So, the same advocate who argued there was essentially one appropriate punishment, i.e. direct imprisonment for Zuma, is now criticising the prosecution for allegedly thinking there is only one punishment for Malema. In Zuma’s case, whom he stringently presented as a former head of state, defying the highest court in the land, Ngcukaitobi pushed for the harshest custodial outcome available, using Zuma’s status as an aggravating factor. In Malema’s case, he is now arguing that imprisonment is counterproductive and that a person’s status should be irrelevant.

Sizwe SikaMusi

89,574 views • 3 months ago

THABO MBEKI The reason we are in this mess in South Africa it is because of, amongst others, counter revolutionary people like Jacob Zuma. These are people who never wanted this democratic dispensation. It is no coincidence that ANC of 1994 - 2008 is different from ANC of 2009 - 2022. Zuma & them destroyed this country Eskom, SARS and the ANC. He is now saying he is MK but ANC member. It can't be. Something is wrong. MK Party is led by the same crooks who tried to destroy SARS The ANCYL of Malema pursued policies of someone else. The land issue they made noise about is not ANC policy Our policy says everyone must share the land.
6:42

THABO MBEKI The reason we are in this mess in South Africa it is because of, amongst others, counter revolutionary people like Jacob Zuma. These are people who never wanted this democratic dispensation. It is no coincidence that ANC of 1994 - 2008 is different from ANC of 2009 - 2022. Zuma & them destroyed this country Eskom, SARS and the ANC. He is now saying he is MK but ANC member. It can't be. Something is wrong. MK Party is led by the same crooks who tried to destroy SARS The ANCYL of Malema pursued policies of someone else. The land issue they made noise about is not ANC policy Our policy says everyone must share the land.

Constitution First 🇿🇦

204,272 views • 2 years ago

Up next at Socialism 2025, longtime Marxist theorist David McNally—now Cullen Distinguished Professor of History & Business at the University of Houston—took the mic to spell out what revolution looks like. And make no mistake: it doesn’t include the state. “Oppressed people have to create a set of revolutionary institutions to take power away from their oppressors.” That’s not metaphor—it’s a roadmap. McNally argues that while calls for a “free Palestinian state” are common, what’s really needed is a transitional revolutionary state—one deliberately designed to “wither away” and be replaced by “democratic councils of self-governance.” “Radical council democracy is not a state in the meaningful sense of the word… It is the dissolution of the state.” This isn't democratic socialism—it’s soft-coded Leninism. McNally distinguishes “self-governance” from “the state,” which he calls “an alienated and oppressive form of governance.” His ideal is a world where traditional government disappears and is replaced by “directly controlled elected councils of the oppressed.” It’s a familiar fantasy: revolution now, institutions later—maybe. Even when he acknowledges that some form of power must exist early on, it’s only to serve as a placeholder until the state can be erased. “We may need… revolutionary power as we hope to see in Palestine, but one that is constantly moving in the direction of radical self-governance from below.” What Geo Maher hinted at, McNally says outright: the state must die, and liberal democracy along with it. Socialism 2025 isn’t just airing academic critiques—it’s platforming ideologues openly theorizing the end of constitutional government. It’s not reform they’re after. It’s a reset.
2:15

Up next at Socialism 2025, longtime Marxist theorist David McNally—now Cullen Distinguished Professor of History & Business at the University of Houston—took the mic to spell out what revolution looks like. And make no mistake: it doesn’t include the state. “Oppressed people have to create a set of revolutionary institutions to take power away from their oppressors.” That’s not metaphor—it’s a roadmap. McNally argues that while calls for a “free Palestinian state” are common, what’s really needed is a transitional revolutionary state—one deliberately designed to “wither away” and be replaced by “democratic councils of self-governance.” “Radical council democracy is not a state in the meaningful sense of the word… It is the dissolution of the state.” This isn't democratic socialism—it’s soft-coded Leninism. McNally distinguishes “self-governance” from “the state,” which he calls “an alienated and oppressive form of governance.” His ideal is a world where traditional government disappears and is replaced by “directly controlled elected councils of the oppressed.” It’s a familiar fantasy: revolution now, institutions later—maybe. Even when he acknowledges that some form of power must exist early on, it’s only to serve as a placeholder until the state can be erased. “We may need… revolutionary power as we hope to see in Palestine, but one that is constantly moving in the direction of radical self-governance from below.” What Geo Maher hinted at, McNally says outright: the state must die, and liberal democracy along with it. Socialism 2025 isn’t just airing academic critiques—it’s platforming ideologues openly theorizing the end of constitutional government. It’s not reform they’re after. It’s a reset.

Stu

31,872 views • 1 year ago

"In a ruined country, neither the land nor the people can remain at peace. Under the roofs of houses in a ruined country, even the traitors who live in luxury as a reward for betraying their country will not be able to sleep in peace. Even though they are alive, the people are worse than gutter dogs, and even if the mountains and rivers remain the same, they will not retain their beauty. A man who perceives this truth before others is called a forerunner; he who struggles against difficulties to save his country from tragedy is called a patriot; and he who sets fire to himself to demonstrate the truth and overthrows the unjust society by rousing the people to action is called a revolutionary." Kim Il Sung ("Kim Become the Sun") Founder and liberator of Korea
0:44

"In a ruined country, neither the land nor the people can remain at peace. Under the roofs of houses in a ruined country, even the traitors who live in luxury as a reward for betraying their country will not be able to sleep in peace. Even though they are alive, the people are worse than gutter dogs, and even if the mountains and rivers remain the same, they will not retain their beauty. A man who perceives this truth before others is called a forerunner; he who struggles against difficulties to save his country from tragedy is called a patriot; and he who sets fire to himself to demonstrate the truth and overthrows the unjust society by rousing the people to action is called a revolutionary." Kim Il Sung ("Kim Become the Sun") Founder and liberator of Korea

COMBATE |🇵🇷

20,200 views • 1 year ago

‘PATRIA O MUERTE!’ On this day in 1928, Argentine communist revolutionary Che Guevara was born. As a young medical student, he traveled across Latin America on his motorbike and was appalled by the sheer amount of disease, hunger, and poverty across the continent. He began to view Latin America as dominated and exploited by US capitalism, a belief that hardened after the CIA orchestrated the coup against Guatemala’s President Jacobo Arbenz, destroying much of the reforms he had implemented. In Mexico City, he met two brothers who shared his ideas; Fidel and Raul Castro. From that moment he joined the 26th of July Movement and became instrumental in the success of the Cuban Revolution and the destruction of the US-backed Batista dictatorship. In Cuba’s government, he spearheaded a successful and rapid literacy campaign, enacted land reform to distribute land from bourgeois land owners to Cuban peasants, and played a key role in defeating the CIA’s Bay of Pigs Invasion. After succeeding in Cuba, Guevara left Cuba to assist revolutionary struggles abroad. He would be captured by CIA-backed Bolivian forces. When Mario Terán, the soldier who would execute him, entered the room, Guevara reportedly said “I know you’ve come to kill me. Shoot, coward! You are only going to kill a man.” In death, Che Guevara would become the iconic symbol of revolutionary martyrdom; giving up his own life with no fear, for the cause of fighting oppression and liberating others. Hasta La Victoria Siempre!
0:39

‘PATRIA O MUERTE!’ On this day in 1928, Argentine communist revolutionary Che Guevara was born. As a young medical student, he traveled across Latin America on his motorbike and was appalled by the sheer amount of disease, hunger, and poverty across the continent. He began to view Latin America as dominated and exploited by US capitalism, a belief that hardened after the CIA orchestrated the coup against Guatemala’s President Jacobo Arbenz, destroying much of the reforms he had implemented. In Mexico City, he met two brothers who shared his ideas; Fidel and Raul Castro. From that moment he joined the 26th of July Movement and became instrumental in the success of the Cuban Revolution and the destruction of the US-backed Batista dictatorship. In Cuba’s government, he spearheaded a successful and rapid literacy campaign, enacted land reform to distribute land from bourgeois land owners to Cuban peasants, and played a key role in defeating the CIA’s Bay of Pigs Invasion. After succeeding in Cuba, Guevara left Cuba to assist revolutionary struggles abroad. He would be captured by CIA-backed Bolivian forces. When Mario Terán, the soldier who would execute him, entered the room, Guevara reportedly said “I know you’ve come to kill me. Shoot, coward! You are only going to kill a man.” In death, Che Guevara would become the iconic symbol of revolutionary martyrdom; giving up his own life with no fear, for the cause of fighting oppression and liberating others. Hasta La Victoria Siempre!

Going Underground

20,589 views • 1 month ago

The Wars of the Elohim Continue to This Day.. Paul Wallis & Mauro Biglino "The Elohim were portioned land and people groups, the land is being portioned by an entity referred to as El Elyon - the powerful one, higher than the other powerful ones, and Yahweh is one of the Elohim, a Junior Elohim - who gets a people group with no land. He does not get all the descendants of Abraham, he gets the tribes of Jacob, the tribes of Israel. This is a problem. So Yahweh goes to war as he wants justice for himself, and for his people group." Yahweh was not kicked out of the Elohim for his warfare, as so many of the ELOHIM were WAREFARING BEINGS - and when we look at the sky council or the council of powers in the Hebrew scriptures, we find that a lot of the time, what they are doing is fomenting war. " - Paul Wallis #IsraelPalestineWar #Palestine #elohim #Yahweh #israel #paulwallis #maurobiglino #the5thkind #war #god #elyon #el
10:18

The Wars of the Elohim Continue to This Day.. Paul Wallis & Mauro Biglino "The Elohim were portioned land and people groups, the land is being portioned by an entity referred to as El Elyon - the powerful one, higher than the other powerful ones, and Yahweh is one of the Elohim, a Junior Elohim - who gets a people group with no land. He does not get all the descendants of Abraham, he gets the tribes of Jacob, the tribes of Israel. This is a problem. So Yahweh goes to war as he wants justice for himself, and for his people group." Yahweh was not kicked out of the Elohim for his warfare, as so many of the ELOHIM were WAREFARING BEINGS - and when we look at the sky council or the council of powers in the Hebrew scriptures, we find that a lot of the time, what they are doing is fomenting war. " - Paul Wallis #IsraelPalestineWar #Palestine #elohim #Yahweh #israel #paulwallis #maurobiglino #the5thkind #war #god #elyon #el

5thkind.tv

27,229 views • 2 years ago

When the Zondo Commission had called for Zuma to come and testify and he refused, it is the EFF President who foresaw the bloodshed that would ensue if he was to be arrested, and went to plead with him in Nkandla. Many today want to distort that history and that visit, and frame it as a historical mistake, when Malema was being a responsible leader to protect black life. Zuma, knowing that there would be a loss of life in his name, refused to testify at the Zondo Commission because of pettiness of recusal applications with his friend. The youngest leader, pleaded for wisdom and humility to an elder and a statesman, to no avail. Zuma knew that blood would flow in his name and instead of a simple process of swallowing his pride and talking at the Zondo Commission, was defiant for defiance sake, because he thrives on victimhood Now you tell us, who has the maturity and capacity to lead black unity? Till today, Zuma wears those deadly unrests with pride, because his ego means more than the black life he claims he wants to unify today. “Nearly 400 people died” Zuma: “Yebo, Yebo” 😔
1:08

When the Zondo Commission had called for Zuma to come and testify and he refused, it is the EFF President who foresaw the bloodshed that would ensue if he was to be arrested, and went to plead with him in Nkandla. Many today want to distort that history and that visit, and frame it as a historical mistake, when Malema was being a responsible leader to protect black life. Zuma, knowing that there would be a loss of life in his name, refused to testify at the Zondo Commission because of pettiness of recusal applications with his friend. The youngest leader, pleaded for wisdom and humility to an elder and a statesman, to no avail. Zuma knew that blood would flow in his name and instead of a simple process of swallowing his pride and talking at the Zondo Commission, was defiant for defiance sake, because he thrives on victimhood Now you tell us, who has the maturity and capacity to lead black unity? Till today, Zuma wears those deadly unrests with pride, because his ego means more than the black life he claims he wants to unify today. “Nearly 400 people died” Zuma: “Yebo, Yebo” 😔

Sinawo Thambo

122,841 views • 1 year ago

Listen to every word “Islam, by nature seeks to control people through government. So by nature, Islam is government.” “I don't think you need intelligence to know what the plans of Islam are. It's very clear. — This is the basic core of what Islam wants to do. This is the basis of sharia, Islamic law. World domination is part of Islamic ambitions. You have to understand the impact on Islam on society is tyranny, and there is a reason for it. Islam, by nature, is not a religion. It's not just a faith between you and God. Islam, by nature is a state. Islam, by nature seeks to control people through government. So by nature, Islam is government. And if you welcome Islam in your midst, you are welcoming the seed for a coup d'etat in your system. You are welcoming the seed of a revolution in your country. Islam is by nature revolutionary against the system.”
1:17

Listen to every word “Islam, by nature seeks to control people through government. So by nature, Islam is government.” “I don't think you need intelligence to know what the plans of Islam are. It's very clear. — This is the basic core of what Islam wants to do. This is the basis of sharia, Islamic law. World domination is part of Islamic ambitions. You have to understand the impact on Islam on society is tyranny, and there is a reason for it. Islam, by nature, is not a religion. It's not just a faith between you and God. Islam, by nature is a state. Islam, by nature seeks to control people through government. So by nature, Islam is government. And if you welcome Islam in your midst, you are welcoming the seed for a coup d'etat in your system. You are welcoming the seed of a revolution in your country. Islam is by nature revolutionary against the system.”

Wall Street Apes

74,971 views • 1 year ago

BHEKI MTOLO 🔥🔥 When we remind Zuma that he is a liar we are not insulting him. We are telling him the truth Zuma thinks people of South Africa are stupid. He destroyed the ANC by dropping its vote which was increasing under Mbeki. But he now blames Ramaphosa for that. He is drunk. Show me one person who was a friend of Zuma in 2007 and who is still his friend today. He spits everyone. Who are we not not be spat by him! It's all about himself. He destroyed Cosatu, SACP, ANCYL, ANC. He is a wrecking ball. It is Ramaphosa who is introducing pro poor policies which Zuma rejected. Ramaphosa may not be a good singer and dancer, but he is more sympathic to the poor in deeds than Zuma. Zuma is just telling us that he is poor, but his actions show a selfish man. It is not a surprise why ANC loses votes in Nkandla. People there can't relate to him. They will now vote ANC since he has left ANC.
9:17

BHEKI MTOLO 🔥🔥 When we remind Zuma that he is a liar we are not insulting him. We are telling him the truth Zuma thinks people of South Africa are stupid. He destroyed the ANC by dropping its vote which was increasing under Mbeki. But he now blames Ramaphosa for that. He is drunk. Show me one person who was a friend of Zuma in 2007 and who is still his friend today. He spits everyone. Who are we not not be spat by him! It's all about himself. He destroyed Cosatu, SACP, ANCYL, ANC. He is a wrecking ball. It is Ramaphosa who is introducing pro poor policies which Zuma rejected. Ramaphosa may not be a good singer and dancer, but he is more sympathic to the poor in deeds than Zuma. Zuma is just telling us that he is poor, but his actions show a selfish man. It is not a surprise why ANC loses votes in Nkandla. People there can't relate to him. They will now vote ANC since he has left ANC.

Constitution First 🇿🇦

227,833 views • 2 years ago

Ernesto “Che” Guevara’s farewell took the form of a letter he wrote in 1965 to Fidel Castro before leaving Cuba to continue the revolutionary struggle abroad. In it, Che explains that he is stepping away from all his official positions and even renouncing his Cuban citizenship, not out of disappointment, but out of a profound sense of duty. He writes that Cuba has already given him everything, and that he cannot remain in safety while other nations are still fighting against oppression. The letter reflects his deep loyalty to Fidel and the Cuban Revolution, as well as his belief in international revolution rather than remaining in power. Che openly accepts the possibility of failure, imprisonment, or death, presenting his departure as a moral obligation rather than a personal choice. The farewell later became one of the most iconic texts associated with his legacy as a committed, self-sacrificing revolutionary.
0:38

Ernesto “Che” Guevara’s farewell took the form of a letter he wrote in 1965 to Fidel Castro before leaving Cuba to continue the revolutionary struggle abroad. In it, Che explains that he is stepping away from all his official positions and even renouncing his Cuban citizenship, not out of disappointment, but out of a profound sense of duty. He writes that Cuba has already given him everything, and that he cannot remain in safety while other nations are still fighting against oppression. The letter reflects his deep loyalty to Fidel and the Cuban Revolution, as well as his belief in international revolution rather than remaining in power. Che openly accepts the possibility of failure, imprisonment, or death, presenting his departure as a moral obligation rather than a personal choice. The farewell later became one of the most iconic texts associated with his legacy as a committed, self-sacrificing revolutionary.

Antifa_Ultras

22,970 views • 5 months ago

The abuse of state resources by Duduzane Zuma is on steroids. On a visit to Eastern Cape, Duduzane Zuma’s motorcade had full SA Police Service 🇿🇦 escort, his vehicles were fitted with blue lights. His security personal armed with machines guns which are illegal and this was in full view of the South African Police . This is the corrupt Zuma family, not even in power but this much abuse of resources. Just imagine what they will do if they get into power.
0:26

The abuse of state resources by Duduzane Zuma is on steroids. On a visit to Eastern Cape, Duduzane Zuma’s motorcade had full SA Police Service 🇿🇦 escort, his vehicles were fitted with blue lights. His security personal armed with machines guns which are illegal and this was in full view of the South African Police . This is the corrupt Zuma family, not even in power but this much abuse of resources. Just imagine what they will do if they get into power.

Goolam

78,841 views • 2 years ago

NO PAN-AFRICANISM WITHOUT SOCIALISM Revolutionary activist Kwame Ture was born on this day in 1941. Let’s remember him by watching him in action: in this clip, he makes the case that Pan-Africanist ideals can only be realised under socialism, because capitalism is the system of the colonialists. To be good Pan-Africanists, he says, we must also be anti-capitalists. Originally from Trinidad and Tobago and known as Stokely Carmichael, he was politically active in US politics as part of the civil rights movement, and was elected chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) in 1966. He vacated the post a year later and, with his wife - the South African songstress Miriam Makeba - moved to Guinea, where he changed his name to Kwame Ture. This was a tip of the hat to his two patrons, Kwame Nkrumah and Sekou Touré. A leading figure of the Pan-African movement, Ture was instrumental in establishing the All African People's Revolutionary Party. Today, the All-African People's Revolutionary Party (A-APRP) extends across the continent, from Guinea-Bissau to Kenya. The ideas he planted continue informing the struggle for liberation today.
1:30

NO PAN-AFRICANISM WITHOUT SOCIALISM Revolutionary activist Kwame Ture was born on this day in 1941. Let’s remember him by watching him in action: in this clip, he makes the case that Pan-Africanist ideals can only be realised under socialism, because capitalism is the system of the colonialists. To be good Pan-Africanists, he says, we must also be anti-capitalists. Originally from Trinidad and Tobago and known as Stokely Carmichael, he was politically active in US politics as part of the civil rights movement, and was elected chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) in 1966. He vacated the post a year later and, with his wife - the South African songstress Miriam Makeba - moved to Guinea, where he changed his name to Kwame Ture. This was a tip of the hat to his two patrons, Kwame Nkrumah and Sekou Touré. A leading figure of the Pan-African movement, Ture was instrumental in establishing the All African People's Revolutionary Party. Today, the All-African People's Revolutionary Party (A-APRP) extends across the continent, from Guinea-Bissau to Kenya. The ideas he planted continue informing the struggle for liberation today.

African Stream

27,447 views • 3 years ago

Under the Shah, Ramadan had a familiar voice. Before the 1979 Revolution, Mohammad Javad Zabihi’s recitations of the athan and Quran were regularly broadcast on national radio. He was a muezzin (a religious singer) whose voice was widely heard, and for many, the sound of Islam. The Shah reportedly took a personal liking to Zabihi’s voice, and his recitations sometimes included brief prayers for the Shah (which is normal for a societies ruled by monarchs). Following the Revolution, he was briefly imprisoned for his mere association with the Shah, but was released without charge. Not long after, he was brutally stabbed to death. Newspapers received a photo of his mutilated body, along with a note from an extremist revolutionary cell claiming responsibility.
0:35

Under the Shah, Ramadan had a familiar voice. Before the 1979 Revolution, Mohammad Javad Zabihi’s recitations of the athan and Quran were regularly broadcast on national radio. He was a muezzin (a religious singer) whose voice was widely heard, and for many, the sound of Islam. The Shah reportedly took a personal liking to Zabihi’s voice, and his recitations sometimes included brief prayers for the Shah (which is normal for a societies ruled by monarchs). Following the Revolution, he was briefly imprisoned for his mere association with the Shah, but was released without charge. Not long after, he was brutally stabbed to death. Newspapers received a photo of his mutilated body, along with a note from an extremist revolutionary cell claiming responsibility.

Mohsen, Esq.

17,210 views • 5 months ago

EXCLUSIVE: Ron Gochez, Union del Barrio, a history teacher at LA public schools and one of the people responsible for organizing the anti ice protests in LA, Paramount, Compton, etc. did an interview with Democracy Now! this morning. Listen to the language he uses. He refers to the people being deported as indigenous to this land and calls it “ancestral land”. This is a revolution. His organization, Union del Barrio, is a Marxist Revolutionary group that also advocates for Palestine. He is trying to paint the illegal aliens as indigenous people with rights to the land. DataRepublican (small r) this is so dangerous. I hope you understand how serious this situation is. Here is one clip. I will post the entire interview in the comments.
2:42

EXCLUSIVE: Ron Gochez, Union del Barrio, a history teacher at LA public schools and one of the people responsible for organizing the anti ice protests in LA, Paramount, Compton, etc. did an interview with Democracy Now! this morning. Listen to the language he uses. He refers to the people being deported as indigenous to this land and calls it “ancestral land”. This is a revolution. His organization, Union del Barrio, is a Marxist Revolutionary group that also advocates for Palestine. He is trying to paint the illegal aliens as indigenous people with rights to the land. DataRepublican (small r) this is so dangerous. I hope you understand how serious this situation is. Here is one clip. I will post the entire interview in the comments.

SKDoubleDub

190,270 views • 1 year ago