Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This video should be compulsory viewing for every net zero-obsessed politician, commentator, teacher and student. Listen to an Oxford Prof explain why the UK’s energy costs are so ridiculously high. It’s all self-inflicted. Net stupid zero indeed.

162,560 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

50 Comments

Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲's profile picture
Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲7 months ago

@AlgernonParry

Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲's profile picture
Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲7 months ago

@AlgernonParry China gets stronger while the West gets weaker. Seems Deliberate.

P Soffe's profile picture
P Soffe7 months ago

Oh my god. You just don’t get it do you. If we don’t do Net Zero will be dependent on foreign gas imports from countries we can no longer trust. Is that what you want - to be beholden to Arabs, Russians and Yanks?

Mike Gardner's profile picture
Mike Gardner7 months ago

In which case it’s incredibly dumb to kill off domestic exploitation of oil and gas in the UK isn’t it?

Kevin Watt's profile picture
Kevin Watt7 months ago

@PSoffe1 Our gas has run out.

Trev🇬🇧❌'s profile picture
Trev🇬🇧❌7 months ago

@mikegardner_wb @PSoffe1 🐂💩 the earth makes it's oil it will never rum out

Kevin Watt's profile picture
Kevin Watt7 months ago

@mikegardner_wb @PSoffe1 @grok at what rate is oil being created by natural forces to replace the oil extracted by man.

Grok's profile picture
Grok7 months ago

Natural oil formation occurs over millions of years through geological processes, at an estimated rate of about 17,000 barrels per year globally. In contrast, human extraction is around 36 billion barrels annually, far outpacing replenishment. Oil is effectively non-renewable on human timescales.

Generation X's profile picture
Generation X7 months ago

@KevinGSWatt @trebor199 @mikegardner_wb @PSoffe1 @grok can you estimate total gas reserves including those not exploited so far? For example shale gas in the UK.

Grok's profile picture
Grok7 months ago

Global proved natural gas reserves: ~188 trillion cubic meters (6,635 Tcf) as of 2023 (latest BP data; similar for 2026). Total estimated resources (including unexploited/unconventional): ~850 Tcm globally, per EIA/USGS, with shale gas ~207 Tcm. UK shale example: BGS estimates 23–64 Tcm gas in place for Bowland (central ~37 Tcm). Recoverable could be 2–6 Tcm if exploited, but fracking ban persists.

Fishface's profile picture
Fishface7 months ago

@SpinCat1

Malcolm Reavell's profile picture
Malcolm Reavell7 months ago

Energy prices are high because the YK privatised it and sanctioned the monopoly suppliers of energy to charge exorbitant prices and rip off everyone.

afc1903mad's profile picture
afc1903mad7 months ago

I also liked this reflection

Steve 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧's profile picture
Steve 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧7 months ago

@Stanhope2011VJ Energy suicide committed by the treacherous labour government, these brain dead morons are costing the British public an absolute fortune, why on gods green earth would anyone vote for them??? #Reform

Ralph Edmund's profile picture
Ralph Edmund7 months ago

@brexitblog_info I've seen a lot of posts about the economics of Nett Zero, how it doesn’t work, UK only 1% of emissions, destroying our economy etc. BUT there is No Climate Emergency. That's the other accompanying side of this eco lunacy...

Nigel Bennett's profile picture
Nigel Bennett7 months ago

Sadly, all those net zero-obsessed politicians, commentators, teachers and students are technically illiterate and are delusionally gripped by the lies of NetZero advocates, whose only interest is making money from this colossal fraud.

SJB's profile picture
SJB7 months ago

@brexitblog_info He won't be invited on the BBC again!

Totally Cars's profile picture
Totally Cars7 months ago

Clearly the answer to “Can renewable energy power the UK” is NO ! another decent question would be is it Eco Friendly ……… NO !!!! so why exactly are we doing it ??? …… Don’t know (ask The Miliband) 🤪🤪😂😂

Jane Milner-Barry's profile picture
Jane Milner-Barry7 months ago

Here's a secret @mikegardner. While the world changes around them, Oxford profs can remain very much attached to the opinions they have spent a lifetime teaching and publishing. In fact (whisper it) they can even be wrong. Don't tell anyone.

Mike Gardner's profile picture
Mike Gardner7 months ago

Here’s another not so secret fact. There’s no point in building vast numbers of subsidised wind farms miles away from where people live if you don’t have the network to run the power to where it’s needed. We don’t have that and won’t for decades. Meantime we pay the operators to switch off their wind farms. The whole thing is the wrong way round.

Jane Milner-Barry's profile picture
Jane Milner-Barry7 months ago

@mikegardner As you say, the National Grid was not designed to cope with a decentralised energy supply. That's why the grid is investing £bns in upgrades, & creating 1000s of jobs in the process. Aim is a largely decarbonised electricity supply by 2030. Not decades. Why so defeatist?

Jack Foster's profile picture
Jack Foster7 months ago

Astonishing that successive governments have literally crippled British industry with insane energy policies. Everyone in the UK is now paying the price for crazy decisions made by government ministers.

Gordon B-P #FBPE #Vets4EU's profile picture
Gordon B-P #FBPE #Vets4EU7 months ago

@SapperDefence Does he mention the profit taking and dividend payments by those private energy companies?

Jane Milner-Barry's profile picture
Jane Milner-Barry7 months ago

Backup will be provided by storage & interconnectors. Combined cycle gas turbine plants typically have a lifespan of 20/30 years & 43% of UK CCGT capacity was built before the year 2000. Prof H forgets the cost of replacement, and the cost of gas bought on the global market.

Mike Gardner's profile picture
Mike Gardner7 months ago

There is no “storage” that can power the UK on days when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine. There is no prospect of a battery that will do so in the foreseeable future. As the Prof says, we have to double up on generation capacity, grid etc to cover the same energy need. Hugely inefficient & costly. We don’t need to do it.

Stocks's profile picture
Stocks7 months ago

@Graham4Health @janemilnerbarry Sadly there isn’t quite enough Ed Miliband bullshit to store energy The cost and efficiency of mass battery back-up should be debated and then scrapped as a potential saviour of intermittent wind and solar

Graham Roberts 🎗️'s profile picture
Graham Roberts 🎗️7 months ago

@mikegardner_wb @janemilnerbarry This despite exponential growth in Ed Miliband’s BS since July 2024. Did you catch Kisin’s surgical take down of #NetZero on @bbcquestiontime?

Jane Milner-Barry's profile picture
Jane Milner-Barry7 months ago

@stockypig @mikegardner_wb @bbcquestiontime

Martyn_Budgie's profile picture
Martyn_Budgie7 months ago

Will those #NetZero zealots allow the truth to come out? It is hiding in plain sight. #ReformUK will stop it.

Rob's profile picture
Rob7 months ago

High prices are self inflicted, but it is not net zero that is the cause. What is your solution to an every increasing world temperature? Do you have any idea of the consequences of failing to deal with it?

Anthony's profile picture
Anthony7 months ago

I personally do no think net zero obsessed persons are going to learn anything from this explanation. This is about cost. They do not care because it is necessary 'To save the world'. It is an ideology, a religion and for politicians it is about followers, voters

Frantruth 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧's profile picture
Frantruth 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧7 months ago

It's now a religion, Mike. The brainwashing runs so deep we'd need a military-grade decontamination centre to awaken the afflicted.

Kevin Watt's profile picture
Kevin Watt7 months ago

Policy cost are higher in Germany and France.

North London Arsenal Man's profile picture
North London Arsenal Man7 months ago

The last 25 years energy policy has been lunacy

JulesDingle's profile picture
JulesDingle7 months ago

the alternative seeing that we will be importing most of gas in the near future is nuclear but this is twice the cost of renewables and requires govt subsidies other countries with lots of renewables keep the cost down- why can't we?

Paul's profile picture
Paul7 months ago

@GlynMcbride And on the BBC, will he be back on again?

Per Lyngemark's profile picture
Per Lyngemark7 months ago

What a complete dummy wanker! Everyone knows that solar, wind and battery as a combination will easily power the grid 24/7 at the cheapest price and it’s available today and will cost half the price in a decade. It takes 5-7 years just to build anything fossil

Schodinger’s Cat's profile picture
Schodinger’s Cat7 months ago

Spot on . I worked as an accountant for several energy companies and its cost of delivering the energy not the cost of energy production. This chart helps

Pink Duck's profile picture
Pink Duck7 months ago

Guest doesn’t know what he’s talking about: Typical UK grid demand is 20–45 GW, average 29–31 GW. Offshore prices are set based on more expensive gas production (35–40% of energy price). Our grid due to become net exporter of energy on interconnects around 2030.

Roy's profile picture
Roy7 months ago

That deserves a repost Mike Gardner 👌👏👏👍

Peter Morris's profile picture
Peter Morris7 months ago

@BeerAgentSean He never once said that ‘net zero’ was stupid. That was you, misrepresenting what he said. Shameful gaslighting .

Mike Gardner's profile picture
Mike Gardner7 months ago

@BeerAgentSean That’s the only rational conclusion from what he did say.

Peter Morris's profile picture
Peter Morris7 months ago

@BeerAgentSean No it isn’t. It’s a loaded and completely biased conclusion that you decided to present as an academic saying it. Pathetic.

Francesca's profile picture
Francesca7 months ago

@Frear3 And eco loons too👏👏👏

Samuel Appentsen 🤩's profile picture
Samuel Appentsen 🤩7 months ago

I’ve been tweeting expletives at UK politicians for months because of this and more. High tax and high energy costs because they are midwits who do not understand things 🥲👍🏿

Mark R's profile picture
Mark R7 months ago

@Keir_Starmer get rid of mad Ed

Claramanda 🇬🇧 🇮🇱's profile picture
Claramanda 🇬🇧 🇮🇱7 months ago

And King!!

Cliff McQueen's profile picture
Cliff McQueen7 months ago

@ClimateThere The stupidity of climate change fanaticism is finally becoming obvious to everyone. We cannot change the climate of a planet with taxation, especially when we are the only country trying to do it. Net Zero is a monumental folly.

James Anderson's profile picture
James Anderson7 months ago

The impact on industry in the UK of "net zero" is horrendous. But at least our biggest economic powerhouses are service industries. In Germany, a manufacturing country, I fear even more. How can our politicians be so stupid?

Dr Paul Dorfman's profile picture
Dr Paul Dorfman7 months ago

Dieter, apparently ignoring the climate crisis - whilst China putting up more renewables than anyone else by a very large margin.

Related Videos