正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This video should be compulsory viewing for every net zero-obsessed politician, commentator, teacher and student. Listen to an Oxford Prof explain why the UK’s energy costs are so ridiculously high. It’s all self-inflicted. Net stupid zero indeed.

162,560 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

50 条评论

Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 的头像
Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲7 个月前

@AlgernonParry

Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 的头像
Joe 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲7 个月前

@AlgernonParry China gets stronger while the West gets weaker. Seems Deliberate.

P Soffe 的头像
P Soffe7 个月前

Oh my god. You just don’t get it do you. If we don’t do Net Zero will be dependent on foreign gas imports from countries we can no longer trust. Is that what you want - to be beholden to Arabs, Russians and Yanks?

Mike Gardner 的头像
Mike Gardner7 个月前

In which case it’s incredibly dumb to kill off domestic exploitation of oil and gas in the UK isn’t it?

Kevin Watt 的头像
Kevin Watt7 个月前

@PSoffe1 Our gas has run out.

Trev🇬🇧❌ 的头像
Trev🇬🇧❌7 个月前

@mikegardner_wb @PSoffe1 🐂💩 the earth makes it's oil it will never rum out

Kevin Watt 的头像
Kevin Watt7 个月前

@mikegardner_wb @PSoffe1 @grok at what rate is oil being created by natural forces to replace the oil extracted by man.

Grok 的头像
Grok7 个月前

Natural oil formation occurs over millions of years through geological processes, at an estimated rate of about 17,000 barrels per year globally. In contrast, human extraction is around 36 billion barrels annually, far outpacing replenishment. Oil is effectively non-renewable on human timescales.

Generation X 的头像
Generation X7 个月前

@KevinGSWatt @trebor199 @mikegardner_wb @PSoffe1 @grok can you estimate total gas reserves including those not exploited so far? For example shale gas in the UK.

Grok 的头像
Grok7 个月前

Global proved natural gas reserves: ~188 trillion cubic meters (6,635 Tcf) as of 2023 (latest BP data; similar for 2026). Total estimated resources (including unexploited/unconventional): ~850 Tcm globally, per EIA/USGS, with shale gas ~207 Tcm. UK shale example: BGS estimates 23–64 Tcm gas in place for Bowland (central ~37 Tcm). Recoverable could be 2–6 Tcm if exploited, but fracking ban persists.

Fishface 的头像
Fishface7 个月前

@SpinCat1

Malcolm Reavell 的头像
Malcolm Reavell7 个月前

Energy prices are high because the YK privatised it and sanctioned the monopoly suppliers of energy to charge exorbitant prices and rip off everyone.

afc1903mad 的头像
afc1903mad7 个月前

I also liked this reflection

Steve 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 的头像
Steve 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧7 个月前

@Stanhope2011VJ Energy suicide committed by the treacherous labour government, these brain dead morons are costing the British public an absolute fortune, why on gods green earth would anyone vote for them??? #Reform

Ralph Edmund 的头像
Ralph Edmund7 个月前

@brexitblog_info I've seen a lot of posts about the economics of Nett Zero, how it doesn’t work, UK only 1% of emissions, destroying our economy etc. BUT there is No Climate Emergency. That's the other accompanying side of this eco lunacy...

Nigel Bennett 的头像
Nigel Bennett7 个月前

Sadly, all those net zero-obsessed politicians, commentators, teachers and students are technically illiterate and are delusionally gripped by the lies of NetZero advocates, whose only interest is making money from this colossal fraud.

SJB 的头像
SJB7 个月前

@brexitblog_info He won't be invited on the BBC again!

Totally Cars 的头像
Totally Cars7 个月前

Clearly the answer to “Can renewable energy power the UK” is NO ! another decent question would be is it Eco Friendly ……… NO !!!! so why exactly are we doing it ??? …… Don’t know (ask The Miliband) 🤪🤪😂😂

Jane Milner-Barry 的头像
Jane Milner-Barry7 个月前

Here's a secret @mikegardner. While the world changes around them, Oxford profs can remain very much attached to the opinions they have spent a lifetime teaching and publishing. In fact (whisper it) they can even be wrong. Don't tell anyone.

Mike Gardner 的头像
Mike Gardner7 个月前

Here’s another not so secret fact. There’s no point in building vast numbers of subsidised wind farms miles away from where people live if you don’t have the network to run the power to where it’s needed. We don’t have that and won’t for decades. Meantime we pay the operators to switch off their wind farms. The whole thing is the wrong way round.

Jane Milner-Barry 的头像
Jane Milner-Barry7 个月前

@mikegardner As you say, the National Grid was not designed to cope with a decentralised energy supply. That's why the grid is investing £bns in upgrades, & creating 1000s of jobs in the process. Aim is a largely decarbonised electricity supply by 2030. Not decades. Why so defeatist?

Jack Foster 的头像
Jack Foster7 个月前

Astonishing that successive governments have literally crippled British industry with insane energy policies. Everyone in the UK is now paying the price for crazy decisions made by government ministers.

Gordon B-P #FBPE #Vets4EU 的头像
Gordon B-P #FBPE #Vets4EU7 个月前

@SapperDefence Does he mention the profit taking and dividend payments by those private energy companies?

Jane Milner-Barry 的头像
Jane Milner-Barry7 个月前

Backup will be provided by storage & interconnectors. Combined cycle gas turbine plants typically have a lifespan of 20/30 years & 43% of UK CCGT capacity was built before the year 2000. Prof H forgets the cost of replacement, and the cost of gas bought on the global market.

Mike Gardner 的头像
Mike Gardner7 个月前

There is no “storage” that can power the UK on days when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine. There is no prospect of a battery that will do so in the foreseeable future. As the Prof says, we have to double up on generation capacity, grid etc to cover the same energy need. Hugely inefficient & costly. We don’t need to do it.

Stocks 的头像
Stocks7 个月前

@Graham4Health @janemilnerbarry Sadly there isn’t quite enough Ed Miliband bullshit to store energy The cost and efficiency of mass battery back-up should be debated and then scrapped as a potential saviour of intermittent wind and solar

Graham Roberts 🎗️ 的头像
Graham Roberts 🎗️7 个月前

@mikegardner_wb @janemilnerbarry This despite exponential growth in Ed Miliband’s BS since July 2024. Did you catch Kisin’s surgical take down of #NetZero on @bbcquestiontime?

Jane Milner-Barry 的头像
Jane Milner-Barry7 个月前

@stockypig @mikegardner_wb @bbcquestiontime

Martyn_Budgie 的头像
Martyn_Budgie7 个月前

Will those #NetZero zealots allow the truth to come out? It is hiding in plain sight. #ReformUK will stop it.

Rob 的头像
Rob7 个月前

High prices are self inflicted, but it is not net zero that is the cause. What is your solution to an every increasing world temperature? Do you have any idea of the consequences of failing to deal with it?

Anthony 的头像
Anthony7 个月前

I personally do no think net zero obsessed persons are going to learn anything from this explanation. This is about cost. They do not care because it is necessary 'To save the world'. It is an ideology, a religion and for politicians it is about followers, voters

Frantruth 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧 的头像
Frantruth 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧7 个月前

It's now a religion, Mike. The brainwashing runs so deep we'd need a military-grade decontamination centre to awaken the afflicted.

Kevin Watt 的头像
Kevin Watt7 个月前

Policy cost are higher in Germany and France.

North London Arsenal Man 的头像
North London Arsenal Man7 个月前

The last 25 years energy policy has been lunacy

JulesDingle 的头像
JulesDingle7 个月前

the alternative seeing that we will be importing most of gas in the near future is nuclear but this is twice the cost of renewables and requires govt subsidies other countries with lots of renewables keep the cost down- why can't we?

Paul 的头像
Paul7 个月前

@GlynMcbride And on the BBC, will he be back on again?

Per Lyngemark 的头像
Per Lyngemark7 个月前

What a complete dummy wanker! Everyone knows that solar, wind and battery as a combination will easily power the grid 24/7 at the cheapest price and it’s available today and will cost half the price in a decade. It takes 5-7 years just to build anything fossil

Schodinger’s Cat 的头像
Schodinger’s Cat7 个月前

Spot on . I worked as an accountant for several energy companies and its cost of delivering the energy not the cost of energy production. This chart helps

Pink Duck 的头像
Pink Duck7 个月前

Guest doesn’t know what he’s talking about: Typical UK grid demand is 20–45 GW, average 29–31 GW. Offshore prices are set based on more expensive gas production (35–40% of energy price). Our grid due to become net exporter of energy on interconnects around 2030.

Roy 的头像
Roy7 个月前

That deserves a repost Mike Gardner 👌👏👏👍

Peter Morris 的头像
Peter Morris7 个月前

@BeerAgentSean He never once said that ‘net zero’ was stupid. That was you, misrepresenting what he said. Shameful gaslighting .

Mike Gardner 的头像
Mike Gardner7 个月前

@BeerAgentSean That’s the only rational conclusion from what he did say.

Peter Morris 的头像
Peter Morris7 个月前

@BeerAgentSean No it isn’t. It’s a loaded and completely biased conclusion that you decided to present as an academic saying it. Pathetic.

Francesca 的头像
Francesca7 个月前

@Frear3 And eco loons too👏👏👏

Samuel Appentsen 🤩 的头像
Samuel Appentsen 🤩7 个月前

I’ve been tweeting expletives at UK politicians for months because of this and more. High tax and high energy costs because they are midwits who do not understand things 🥲👍🏿

Mark R 的头像
Mark R7 个月前

@Keir_Starmer get rid of mad Ed

Claramanda 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 的头像
Claramanda 🇬🇧 🇮🇱7 个月前

And King!!

Cliff McQueen 的头像
Cliff McQueen7 个月前

@ClimateThere The stupidity of climate change fanaticism is finally becoming obvious to everyone. We cannot change the climate of a planet with taxation, especially when we are the only country trying to do it. Net Zero is a monumental folly.

James Anderson 的头像
James Anderson7 个月前

The impact on industry in the UK of "net zero" is horrendous. But at least our biggest economic powerhouses are service industries. In Germany, a manufacturing country, I fear even more. How can our politicians be so stupid?

Dr Paul Dorfman 的头像
Dr Paul Dorfman7 个月前

Dieter, apparently ignoring the climate crisis - whilst China putting up more renewables than anyone else by a very large margin.

相关视频