正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This was a real case from Germany. A surgeon accidentally cut his left hand with a scalpel while removing a malignant abdominal tumour called a fibrous histiocytoma. Five months later, a new tumour appeared at the site of the surgeon’s injured hand. Molecular testing confirmed the impossible: the surgeon...

8,568,822 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

43 条评论

Keith Siau 的头像
Keith Siau2 个月前

Based on this published case report 👇

Dr. Yonni 的头像
Dr. Yonni2 个月前

A surgeon's scalpel slipped, leaving a tiny cut. Invisible seeds from a patient's sarcoma found fertile ground, took root, and months later bloomed into the same cancer at the wound. Science confirmed the cells were identical, proving that, in extraordinarily rare moments, cancer can be transplanted by accident. Never say never in medicine.

Rafael Sirera 的头像
Rafael Sirera2 个月前

As far as transmissible (infectious) tumours go, that Life cover is rather more alarming than that singular transmission case, wouldn't you say? And it becomes quite a lot more concerning when you've got Marilyn Monroe sharing the cover....

Keith Siau 的头像
Keith Siau2 个月前

Life magazine was ahead of its time 😅

Dr.Simon Poul raj MD 的头像
Dr.Simon Poul raj MD2 个月前

A cancer cells doesn’t know or care which body it is in, just survive and divide. The far more documented version happens in organ transplantation - donor-derived cancer transmission, where a kidney or liver harbouring undetected malignant cells is transplanted, and the recipient (on immunosuppressants, unable to reject the foreign cells) develops the donor's cancer. There are dozens of recorded cases, versus this handful from sharps injuries. Same underlying truth in both: cancer isn't really "a disease of an organ," it's a population of rogue cells that will colonise wherever the immune system lets them in. The scalpel case is just the freakiest possible delivery mechanism for something transplant medicine sees far more often. Great case to pull out doc

Choen Lee 的头像
Choen Lee2 个月前

Wow cancer cells can be contagious?

Keith Siau 的头像
Keith Siau2 个月前

Foreign cancer cells are usually intercepted and cleared by the immune system - this particular type must have been able to evade the usual defences to implant successfully.

Real Rotator 的头像
Real Rotator2 个月前

@ahchoen Or the surgeon was immunocompromised at that time by a secondary cause, unbeknownst to him. A healthy immune system generally protects against this scenario.

The Ashes of Absolution 的头像
The Ashes of Absolution2 个月前

@drkeithsiau @ahchoen So in theory a nation could weaponize cancer against assassination targets if combined with a immunosuppressant or if factors are intentionally set to cause an individual to be immunocompromised. I wonder if they could make the cancer more resistant to treatment via mutation?

Real Rotator 的头像
Real Rotator2 个月前

@drkeithsiau @ahchoen “make the cancer more resistant to treatment via mutation” => cancers do this by default unfortunately. It’s why a reoccurrence often doesn’t respond to the same treatment. “Weaponise cancer”? It’s not a drop dead quick disease. It takes some time to grow and kill.

Choen Lee 的头像
Choen Lee2 个月前

@Aesop_Was_Right @drkeithsiau Perfect assassination. Not suspicious looking

Big Thinker 的头像
Big Thinker2 个月前

Doesnt this mean that surgically removing a tumor can spread the cancer

Rohan 的头像
Rohan2 个月前

And yet biopsies are “standard medical procedure” lol. Current medical system is evil

Popo Korne 的头像
Popo Korne2 个月前

good news: successfully removed. bad news: the case study will haunt every med student forever 😅

Sanal MG 的头像
Sanal MG2 个月前

Was the surgeon immunocompromised?

Keith Siau 的头像
Keith Siau2 个月前

Good thought! Apparently not!

Rob M.D. 🫀 的头像
Rob M.D. 🫀2 个月前

A lot of people are afraid that biopsies spread cancer.. this has been a "myth" in oncology... But this case will cause a lot of fear out there .

bucket 的头像
bucket2 个月前

Interesting. Tumor seeding….seems plausible that a biopsy may ‘scatter the seeds’

Josh LaFrance 的头像
Josh LaFrance2 个月前

And we laugh when it's said biopsies spread cancer. SMDH.

Venlafaxine withdrawal 的头像
Venlafaxine withdrawal2 个月前

This proves that biopsies can cause cancer to spread.

Marco 🇳🇱 的头像
Marco 🇳🇱2 个月前

And lately this seems to happen to fish in canada and the US, some kind of skin cancer is spreading. See @outbreakupdates latest post(s)

Keith Siau 的头像
Keith Siau2 个月前

@outbreakupdates Not sure about marine life, but transmissible cancers caused by infection is well known in humans, the most common one being HPV.

Helen Metcalfe 🩵 ⚽️👩‍⚕️ 🚴 ✝️ 的头像
Helen Metcalfe 🩵 ⚽️👩‍⚕️ 🚴 ✝️2 个月前

Wow 😮 That’s extremely unusual! Perils of being a surgeon.

Keith Siau 的头像
Keith Siau2 个月前

Tumour seeding is something we are paranoid about, although we tend to see this transmitted across different sites within the same person

who cares 的头像
who cares2 个月前

Does this prove that cancer can spread by doing biopsy ?

NovaCourt 的头像
NovaCourt2 个月前

Seeding. Literally obsessed over this while my tumor was still in my body. I was horrified after my biopsy.

Tom O'Hare 的头像
Tom O'Hare2 个月前

I've often wondered if that would be possible, given the mechanisms cancers cells use to avoid immune detection

St. Trina 的头像
St. Trina2 个月前

Blood-borne mentioned

TexasMotivator 的头像
TexasMotivator2 个月前

Reminds me of another bizarre medical history fact:

Sadia A 🇵🇰 的头像
Sadia A 🇵🇰2 个月前

😮

Christophe Dubuit 的头像
Christophe Dubuit2 个月前

"I would bet that by 2050 we’ll have found that more than 80 percent of all human cancer is caused by infection. In 1975 the number was considered to be zero." Paul W. Ewald, 2009 (biologist, University of Louisville in Kentucky, author of Plague Time : the new germ theory of disease, published in 2000).

Ease of Lyfe 的头像
Ease of Lyfe2 个月前

So a biopsy done on cancer could potentially spread cancer?

ShayGaetz 的头像
ShayGaetz2 个月前

Here’s another head-scratcher Donor clonal hematopoiesis can occasionally progress toward rare malignant disease in the recipient, even while the donor remains clinically well.

Dr. CZ 的头像
Dr. CZ2 个月前

Wild case — cancer cells are surprisingly resilient. Solid reminder that sharps safety isn't just about blood-borne viruses. Thanks for sharing!"

(✿◠‿◠) 的头像
(✿◠‿◠)2 个月前

@grok can cancer be spread from cat to human

Salt & Light Now 的头像
Salt & Light Now2 个月前

Parasites are contagious - ivermectin kills cancer and parasites. Correlation?

D John 的头像
D John2 个月前

Imagine explaining this to your insurance: ‘I caught my patient’s sarcoma through a paper cut.’ Proof that sharps safety isn’t just about HIV and hep C

ラコフフ 的头像
ラコフフ2 个月前

ウィルス細菌カビ、寄生虫の類いやな。

Red White Blue🐭 的头像
Red White Blue🐭2 个月前

This was seen also with the nazi experiments…this is not new!

His Divine Shadow 的头像
His Divine Shadow2 个月前

So if you biopsy a tumor in your body, you can spread the same cancer throughout your body?

Rajesh punia 的头像
Rajesh punia2 个月前

This case highlights why meticulous handling of sharps, careful surgical technique, and prompt management of percutaneous injuries are essential—not only to prevent infections but also because, in extremely rare instances, tumour cell implantation can occur.

DaveSmith1462 的头像
DaveSmith14622 个月前

Yet we biopsy people routinely

DOCTOR ON CALL 🩺 的头像
DOCTOR ON CALL 🩺2 个月前

Fascinating case, proof that cancer cells can implant directly, but still not contagious like a virus. Accidental tumor transplantation via scalpel is crazyyy

相关视频

Can you help? Mateo is eight. In November his much worshipped big sister Liz died age 17 from a rare and aggressive sarcoma called Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumour. It’s a cancer that is so destructive only 15% of those diagnosed live five years. Liz lived just ten months. Mateo wants to make a difference. So many people haven’t yet heard of DSRCT that he wants to get everyone talking about it. His mission is to make a video with as many different people, in as many different places, doing as many different things as they can whilst talking about Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumour. He would love your help in recording a line he can use in his video: All you have to do is say ‘I’m/ we’re talking about Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumour whilst…’ then point to the right to pass it on. You can tag PumpkinsandPost-Its on Twitter, @lizhatton_photography on Instagram or use the hashtag #DesmoplasticSmallRoundCellTumour on any platform to make sure he sees your videos. If you could link to the Just Giving page we have set up to raise funds for research that would be amazing: Mateo knows some people will find being in a video tricky. So, he is offering a print of one of Liz’s photographs of your choice, paid for with his own money for the video he loves the most. Even if you can’t make a video please do like, share, comment or tag someone else who you think we might be able to persuade to join in. Together we can make a difference! (Competition closes 01.03.25 - talking about Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumour encouraged ad infinitum)

PumpkinsandPost-Its

55,855 次观看 • 1 年前

Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin has multiple anti-cancer effects. “There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin,” oncologist Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, told The Epoch Times. The news outlet reported: "It [ivermectin] has a broad impact on the immune system, increasing immune offense against cancers." "It also inhibits cancer cell cycles, helping prevent the formation of new cancer cells. The drug promotes the killing of cancer cells by inducing mitochondrial stress and prevents cancer survival by preventing new blood vessels, which transport energy and fuel to cancers, from forming near cancer cells." Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, a cancer surgeon, observed a resounding improvement in three patients under her consultation after they started using ivermectin with additional therapies. One patient, facing terminal stage 4 prostate cancer and given only three weeks to live after all treatments failed, began using ivermectin. Remarkably, within two months, his indicators of prostate cancer plummeted, and by six months, his cancer had significantly receded. Less than a year later, he was energetically dancing for four hours, three nights a week. This miraculous recovery was not isolated, as two more patients experienced similar outcomes. Dr. Ruddy, with over 30 years in cancer surgery, reflected on these cases, saying, “I’ve been a cancer surgeon for over 30 years. I’ve never seen anything like this in one patient—let alone three in a row.” Read the full report in the comment below:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,192,398 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says drpaulmarik: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says drpaulmarik. Yes, ivermectin. Independent Medical Alliance

Jan Jekielek

96,002 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨🇺🇸“WHY ISN’T THIS FRONT-PAGE NEWS?” — DR DIAZ ON CANCER These numbers stopped me in my tracks. During my conversation with Dr Diaz, he described results from a cancer treatment approach that he says included: 32.8% — NO EVIDENCE OF DISEASE and 15.6% — TUMOUR REGRESSION Not merely in early disease. We were discussing late-stage cancer as well. My immediate reaction was: Why aren't more doctors talking about this? Why isn't this front-page news? Dr Diaz's answer was extraordinary. “That is called indoctrination, Jim.” He argues that medical education teaches doctors to remain within established treatment frameworks — and that stepping outside accepted medical orthodoxy can carry serious professional consequences. That's a provocative accusation. And the cancer figures themselves need context: percentages alone cannot establish whether a treatment works without knowing the study design, patient population, controls, endpoints and statistical strength of the evidence. But if results of this magnitude are being reported, there is an obvious response: INVESTIGATE THEM. Run properly controlled clinical trials. Replicate the findings independently. Publish everything. Because cancer patients don't need hype. They don't need promising treatments suppressed either. THEY NEED THE TRUTH. And if an inexpensive or unconventional treatment really can produce meaningful tumour regression in advanced cancer... THE WORLD DESERVES TO KNOW. The Wellness Company Dr. Alejandro Díaz

Jim Ferguson

13,588 次观看 • 1 个月前

Professor Emeritus Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University of Science: "It is almost certain that vaccines are contaminated with DNA. mRNA vaccines containing the DNA causes turbo cancers." Professor Murakami explains the mechanism of turbo cancers: The covid vaccines are expected to contain only mRNA. However, it has been proven that the vaccines contain considerable amounts of DNA and other substances that should not be present. There is no doubt about it now. DNA can enter human cells very easily, regardless of length, and can get into cells everywhere. When DNA gets in the center of an important gene, the important gene will stop functioning. One problem is that the mRNA vaccine of Pfizer contains a promoter sequence of the cancer virus called SV40. This sequence could enter the human genome, and awakens and activates dormant carcinogenic genes. As a result, the risk of developing cancer increases. mRNA vaccines increase the risk of developing cancer while suppressing the immunity. Vaccination increases the risk of developing cancer dramatically compared to the unvaccinated state. The more people get vaccinated, the more people will probably get cancer. Vaccines appear to increase the risk of all types of cancers. There is credible information that the number of leukemia cases is on the rise. Vaccination causes the promoter sequence of the cancer virus to enter white blood cells and attach to red blood cells everywhere. As a result, more and more leukemia cases are reported. A lot of spikes of mRNA are produced. The spikes would be most protected from destruction. Possibly, long spike genes remain intact. So, if the long spike genes remain there, gene expression will continue to take place all the time. That is, spikes are generated forever. Once the DNA gets into the stem cells, the DNA will keep creating more and more spikes. As a result, IgG4 antibodies are induced. The number of spike-producing cells will not decrease, and it becomes impossible to get rid of spike-producing cells. As a results, It becomes normal for spikes to be present in cells. The produced spikes then flow into the bloodstream and cause a variety of health problems. So, any vaccine that induces IgG4 is deemed as a defective vaccine, and should no longer be produced. Normally, cancer cells are born and grow slowly. However, the vaccine suppresses the immunity, which makes it easier for cancer cells to grow. The vaccines cause turbo cancers. Suppression of the immunity is a major factor of turbo cancers. The increase in IgG4 antibodies results in suppression of cancer immunity. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more intense the inflammation caused by the vaccine becomes. DNA is a foreign substance to the cells. So, DNA causes a severe reaction and kills the immune system of the cells. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more severe the side effects caused by the vaccine become. Vaccines could contain many different impurities, but one possibility could be DNA. In the first place, DNA is something that should not be put into cells of your body.

You

574,563 次观看 • 2 年前

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why. 1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects: Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, "There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin." 2. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation: Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also "enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy." This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments. 3. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles: The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells. 4. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells: Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread. 5. Synergizes with Immunotherapy: Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body's immune response to fight cancer. "What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations," he said. 6. Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer's resilience and ability to recur. 7. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson: Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors. After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson's carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months. Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson's liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden. Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

532,851 次观看 • 2 年前