正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This was called a flagrant on Angel Reese. She was clearly going for the ball. It was obviously not intentional. It’s just hoops, it’s not that serious.

1,255,356 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Women’s Hoops Network 的头像
Women’s Hoops Network2 年前

No one is saying this is not a flagrant. We are saying that it was clearly not intentional, a basketball play, and that harassing a player for hooping and doing their job is wrong.

Pat MacAfein (Parody) 的头像
Pat MacAfein (Parody)2 年前

How do you have a whole page dedicated to basketball and still not see why this was a flagrant

Be free🦋 的头像
Be free🦋2 年前

A flagrant 1 is classified as unintentional thoo. It can be unintentional and dangerous at the same time.

Women’s Hoops Network 的头像
Women’s Hoops Network2 年前

No one is not saying that.

JoakimNoahsark 的头像
JoakimNoahsark2 年前

We only know Angel Reese because of Caitlin Clark

Jeramiah Poyer 的头像
Jeramiah Poyer2 年前

Incidental contact to the head is always a flagrant 1 in every level every gender

Aaron J. Fentress 的头像
Aaron J. Fentress2 年前

Nah. Good call. Angel wasn’t close to the ball. Had no real chance at it from behind. Unnecessary foul.

onegospel 的头像
onegospel2 年前

Your coverage is worse than her game

Josh C. 的头像
Josh C.2 年前

Doesn’t matter if it wasn’t intentional. It was a hard hit to the head. If it would be the other way around you would be demanding CC fined and suspended

相关视频