Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
This was called a flagrant on Angel Reese. She was clearly going for the ball. It was obviously not intentional. It’s just hoops, it’s not that serious.
1,255,338 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)
9 Comments

No one is saying this is not a flagrant. We are saying that it was clearly not intentional, a basketball play, and that harassing a player for hooping and doing their job is wrong.

How do you have a whole page dedicated to basketball and still not see why this was a flagrant

A flagrant 1 is classified as unintentional thoo. It can be unintentional and dangerous at the same time.

No one is not saying that.

We only know Angel Reese because of Caitlin Clark

Incidental contact to the head is always a flagrant 1 in every level every gender

Nah. Good call. Angel wasn’t close to the ball. Had no real chance at it from behind. Unnecessary foul.

Your coverage is worse than her game

Doesn’t matter if it wasn’t intentional. It was a hard hit to the head. If it would be the other way around you would be demanding CC fined and suspended


