Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This was called a flagrant on Angel Reese. She was clearly going for the ball. It was obviously not intentional. It’s just hoops, it’s not that serious.

1,255,338 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Women’s Hoops Network's profile picture
Women’s Hoops Network2 years ago

No one is saying this is not a flagrant. We are saying that it was clearly not intentional, a basketball play, and that harassing a player for hooping and doing their job is wrong.

Pat MacAfein (Parody)'s profile picture
Pat MacAfein (Parody)2 years ago

How do you have a whole page dedicated to basketball and still not see why this was a flagrant

Be free🦋's profile picture
Be free🦋2 years ago

A flagrant 1 is classified as unintentional thoo. It can be unintentional and dangerous at the same time.

Women’s Hoops Network's profile picture
Women’s Hoops Network2 years ago

No one is not saying that.

JoakimNoahsark's profile picture
JoakimNoahsark2 years ago

We only know Angel Reese because of Caitlin Clark

Jeramiah Poyer's profile picture
Jeramiah Poyer2 years ago

Incidental contact to the head is always a flagrant 1 in every level every gender

Aaron J. Fentress's profile picture
Aaron J. Fentress2 years ago

Nah. Good call. Angel wasn’t close to the ball. Had no real chance at it from behind. Unnecessary foul.

onegospel's profile picture
onegospel2 years ago

Your coverage is worse than her game

Josh C.'s profile picture
Josh C.2 years ago

Doesn’t matter if it wasn’t intentional. It was a hard hit to the head. If it would be the other way around you would be demanding CC fined and suspended

Related Videos