Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

This was meant to be a low effort edit why did DaVinci freeze like 4 different times!? Anyways Salem captured Ruby yada yada seggs Art: NyxxZeiss 🔞 Ruby/Salem: 🍒 CherryRuby_VA🎙🔞 (COMMISSIONS OPEN) (voice pack) Edit: CandyAudio 🔞(COMMS OPEN)

CandyAudioEdits's profile picture

CandyAudio 🔞(COMMS OPEN)

16,455 subscribers

28,326 次观看 • 28 天前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Shego vs Mavis | Voice acted video 🥊 Art by Danito Shego voiced by 🍒 CherryRuby_VA🎙🔞 (COMMISSIONS OPEN) Mavis voiced by VixxenVA 💋 (comms open!) Patreon exclusive since September 2, 2024 #boxing #femaleboxing #fanart #HotelTransylvania #KimPossible #crossover
0:39

Shego vs Mavis | Voice acted video 🥊 Art by Danito Shego voiced by 🍒 CherryRuby_VA🎙🔞 (COMMISSIONS OPEN) Mavis voiced by VixxenVA 💋 (comms open!) Patreon exclusive since September 2, 2024 #boxing #femaleboxing #fanart #HotelTransylvania #KimPossible #crossover

InvadermuriloX 🇧🇷 (COMMISSIONS ARE CLOSED)

25,555 次观看 • 1 年前

Okay okay, here's the actually video (2/2) 🎙️VA: 🔞PhosphorusVA | NSFW Voice Actor | DM For Booking 🎨Art: 🔞XStupid_FurryX🔞 (OPEN COMMS) 🔊SFX Pack: HentAudio 🇺🇦 🟢COMMS OPEN🟢 💵Commissioned: Nice and Grey 💻Edit: Take a guess #NSFW #Furry #Yaoi
1:19

Sensitive content

Okay okay, here's the actually video (2/2) 🎙️VA: 🔞PhosphorusVA | NSFW Voice Actor | DM For Booking 🎨Art: 🔞XStupid_FurryX🔞 (OPEN COMMS) 🔊SFX Pack: HentAudio 🇺🇦 🟢COMMS OPEN🟢 💵Commissioned: Nice and Grey 💻Edit: Take a guess #NSFW #Furry #Yaoi

Fumio Bukita

69,530 次观看 • 2 年前

Queen Tyr’Ahnee gonna need to get used to her GIGANTIC new assets cause something tells me it's gonna take a LONG time to repair the ray! 😏 🎨 = 🔞 Mei Lewds 🔞 - OPENING COMMS AUGUST 3RD 🎙️ = 🍒 CherryRuby_VA🎙🔞 (COMMISSIONS OPEN)
0:23

Queen Tyr’Ahnee gonna need to get used to her GIGANTIC new assets cause something tells me it's gonna take a LONG time to repair the ray! 😏 🎨 = 🔞 Mei Lewds 🔞 - OPENING COMMS AUGUST 3RD 🎙️ = 🍒 CherryRuby_VA🎙🔞 (COMMISSIONS OPEN)

Crimson Crow VA (Commissions Open) 🔞

143,286 次观看 • 2 年前

🐇Incubus Roommate🏥 🎨 - 🌟 ＡＫＩ🌟 @ DADSON YAOI TIME Merryweather Comics 🎙️ (Human Prey) - 🔞TwinkyKaiju VA🔞| {COMMs Open} 🎙️ (Incubus) - Me!! Collab!! This was a fun one to edit!
1:01

🐇Incubus Roommate🏥 🎨 - 🌟 ＡＫＩ🌟 @ DADSON YAOI TIME Merryweather Comics 🎙️ (Human Prey) - 🔞TwinkyKaiju VA🔞| {COMMs Open} 🎙️ (Incubus) - Me!! Collab!! This was a fun one to edit!

Aurum Amartis 💛 Bimgle!💜

26,652 次观看 • 6 个月前

How about a romantic evening with the vixen that leads to an intimate finale?... Today is February 14th, so Blaine decided to prepare a little surprise for you 📷 A racier version is viewable via this link: VA: 🍒 CherryRuby_VA🎙🔞 (COMMISSIONS OPEN)
0:33

Sensitive content

How about a romantic evening with the vixen that leads to an intimate finale?... Today is February 14th, so Blaine decided to prepare a little surprise for you 📷 A racier version is viewable via this link: VA: 🍒 CherryRuby_VA🎙🔞 (COMMISSIONS OPEN)

Alcyone legends

200,578 次观看 • 2 年前

I put together a compilation of all the 'I Think We're Gonna Have To Kill This Guy' Steven Universe memes we voiced! Which one was your favorite? 🎨 Artists Featured: ✨seasaltcosmos✨OPEN FOR WORK! ʙᴇᴄᴋʏ🔞 Fab (COMMISSIONS OPEN) rad 💜🏹 shop open! @Thatbirdguy_ ııdouǝɯǝlƎ (Commissions Closed) Dae 💫✨ @DessyDreamer 💜💛 DJ_Drawsome 💛💜 | Back to the Art Stuff 🖌️ ⋆˙✦ Robby💫. ݁₊ kiwii 𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓾𝓴𝓸 🍓🎀 Jun Kurosu ilu Brandon Santiago @tokenblckfrnd Sam @/purplepipp Nati on VGen @hugs4toh MarlineAnimates🌱 💀burger water💀 ColorBrews(.bsky) 🎙️ VAs Featured: Kevin Paculan Meggie-Elise | Voice Actor 🎙️🌸✨ 🎙Juan🌌 Voice Actor Josh Portillo 🎙 D. Tyler Fultz Dray/Lüstaire Liv Smith 🏳️‍⚧️🇮🇪 Pax ➡️ DFW SJ Harris | Voice Actress Diana Helen Kennedy, Voice Actor HyperVoiceActing Max Lindsey Voice Over DietDrKelpVA @/someactingguy Jacie Wiley Malcolm Ray ✌🏿 BigBenVA Josie O' Lantern - VA🏳️‍⚧️🌈🐢 @/RaymonVillaVO GM Hakim 🎙️ Voice Actor ColorBrews(.bsky)
3:05

I put together a compilation of all the 'I Think We're Gonna Have To Kill This Guy' Steven Universe memes we voiced! Which one was your favorite? 🎨 Artists Featured: ✨seasaltcosmos✨OPEN FOR WORK! ʙᴇᴄᴋʏ🔞 Fab (COMMISSIONS OPEN) rad 💜🏹 shop open! @Thatbirdguy_ ııdouǝɯǝlƎ (Commissions Closed) Dae 💫✨ @DessyDreamer 💜💛 DJ_Drawsome 💛💜 | Back to the Art Stuff 🖌️ ⋆˙✦ Robby💫. ݁₊ kiwii 𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓾𝓴𝓸 🍓🎀 Jun Kurosu ilu Brandon Santiago @tokenblckfrnd Sam @/purplepipp Nati on VGen @hugs4toh MarlineAnimates🌱 💀burger water💀 ColorBrews(.bsky) 🎙️ VAs Featured: Kevin Paculan Meggie-Elise | Voice Actor 🎙️🌸✨ 🎙Juan🌌 Voice Actor Josh Portillo 🎙 D. Tyler Fultz Dray/Lüstaire Liv Smith 🏳️‍⚧️🇮🇪 Pax ➡️ DFW SJ Harris | Voice Actress Diana Helen Kennedy, Voice Actor HyperVoiceActing Max Lindsey Voice Over DietDrKelpVA @/someactingguy Jacie Wiley Malcolm Ray ✌🏿 BigBenVA Josie O' Lantern - VA🏳️‍⚧️🌈🐢 @/RaymonVillaVO GM Hakim 🎙️ Voice Actor ColorBrews(.bsky)

Meggie-Elise | Voice Actor 🎙️🌸✨

15,295 次观看 • 1 年前

🗣️: Pls. tell us about the cake. Did Bright order the wrong one, or did he not know about the cake? 👩: It was like this.🙄 Can I just say it? 😂 👩: Well... This is a boy, you know? He didn't order it himself. You know what I mean? He had his manager order it. And he probably... Lemme put things in order first. 👩: From the start, I knew he didn't order it himself for sure. I know my friend well. So, I pretended to ask him what kind of cake he ordered and he replied with that cake. Gulf was confused why Bright didn't know about it since Bright was the one who sent Gulf the shop info and had Gulf choose which to order. And at that time, Bright kinda said [to Gulf], "Oh, it's this shop?" So, Gulf thought Bright knew what kinds of cake this shop had. But in fact he didn't even know what kind of cake he brought. 🗣️: Give him credit for effort. 👩: Full marks💯 for effort. 👩: At first my friends said they would buy me a present. So, I was glad that I got a cake because if I got a present, I had no idea what that would be.😂 You know what I mean?😂 👩: And the funny thing was... Did I bring it with me? Is it in my bag? 🗣️: The card? 👩: Yes! Well, he brought me the cake, right? We were eating it and then Bright said, "Oh, right! There was a card that we (B & G) really meant to write especially for you." I was like... Oh... I would cry over this again for sure. What did my friends write for me? I thought it must be very touching. He then walked to the staff to look for the card. At first, I told him it was fine as I thought it was just a typical card [from the shop]; they might have thrown it away. But he said no, he and Gulf really, really meant to write this card for me. So, I kinda prepared to shed tears. He went to get the card. When it came, I was about to open it, and then I told myself, "No, don't cry, don't cry. I had cried several times this week." 👩: "Happy birthday [to] TN from Bright & Gulf"🙏 👩: ....🙄 👩: "Dudes, you could have just DMed me that!" 👩: It was like that. Boys. (😂) #Thanaerng #GulfKanawut #bbrightvc #bright #BrightVachirawit
2:20

🗣️: Pls. tell us about the cake. Did Bright order the wrong one, or did he not know about the cake? 👩: It was like this.🙄 Can I just say it? 😂 👩: Well... This is a boy, you know? He didn't order it himself. You know what I mean? He had his manager order it. And he probably... Lemme put things in order first. 👩: From the start, I knew he didn't order it himself for sure. I know my friend well. So, I pretended to ask him what kind of cake he ordered and he replied with that cake. Gulf was confused why Bright didn't know about it since Bright was the one who sent Gulf the shop info and had Gulf choose which to order. And at that time, Bright kinda said [to Gulf], "Oh, it's this shop?" So, Gulf thought Bright knew what kinds of cake this shop had. But in fact he didn't even know what kind of cake he brought. 🗣️: Give him credit for effort. 👩: Full marks💯 for effort. 👩: At first my friends said they would buy me a present. So, I was glad that I got a cake because if I got a present, I had no idea what that would be.😂 You know what I mean?😂 👩: And the funny thing was... Did I bring it with me? Is it in my bag? 🗣️: The card? 👩: Yes! Well, he brought me the cake, right? We were eating it and then Bright said, "Oh, right! There was a card that we (B & G) really meant to write especially for you." I was like... Oh... I would cry over this again for sure. What did my friends write for me? I thought it must be very touching. He then walked to the staff to look for the card. At first, I told him it was fine as I thought it was just a typical card [from the shop]; they might have thrown it away. But he said no, he and Gulf really, really meant to write this card for me. So, I kinda prepared to shed tears. He went to get the card. When it came, I was about to open it, and then I told myself, "No, don't cry, don't cry. I had cried several times this week." 👩: "Happy birthday [to] TN from Bright & Gulf"🙏 👩: ....🙄 👩: "Dudes, you could have just DMed me that!" 👩: It was like that. Boys. (😂) #Thanaerng #GulfKanawut #bbrightvc #bright #BrightVachirawit

Bright International Fanclub☀️🌏🤍

24,200 次观看 • 19 天前

A Plea for Difficult Images (A small rant about what I think art is today) Why does the contemporary art world embrace the ugly, the every day, the absurd, the nonsensical, and the visually and conceptually challenging? Why is that? You know this is the case because, 5 out 10 times, you come out of a contemporary art museum asking: What just happened!? What the f*** is this? Why is this art? Well, it is a long story, but let's start with something basic, like, pretty, beautiful images have been done ad infinitum up until the 20th century. Every pretty sunset, cityscape, landscape, still life, and portrait has been done before to perfection. You just need to open up a history of art book, and you will find hundreds of examples of pretty images. The challenge for artists after the invention of the photographic camera, which rendered things so perfectly, was to see other things. The challenge for artists today is to see the world differently: ugly, weird, absurd, unrecognizable. The artist´s mission suddenly became to ask questions and to think and represent differently: art is the place where we can have no certainty; where it is ok to make no sense and just present questions. Beautiful things still get made. Cute is still a thing in 21st-century art, But for completely different reasons. Beauty is not done for beauty's sake, but to challenge why we would, after thousands of years, still want to see beautiful images. Abstract art was once a f*** you to the establishment. But ever since the world tamed it, abstract art has become decorative at best. The last moment or revival of this form was called "Zombie Formalism" for it´s complacent visuals with "modernist and expressionistic styles,” which worked perfectly to please collectors interested in flipping works of art they did not understand from emerging artists who essentially crafted hundreds of generic images indistinguishable from one another. Contemporary art has moved into a space where artists tend to challenge art and beauty. They´ve become philosophers of the image, and in doing so, they have left many viewers perplexed and confused as to what exactly it is that they are witnessing or supposed to connect with. It seems that art today asks viewers and collectors to go on the same trip that the artist has gone through: understand thousands of years of art, read all the books that questioned why that was all made, and experiment with them in what can be considered art today. For those curious about art and collecting, they usually come to art with a blank slate and arrive at pretty pictures and, as many viewers for thousands of years, enjoy what they are looking at. The creators of those pretty pictures call themselves artists, and so it seems the system works. But when those pretty pictures escape the niche they are produced in and try to mingle with the contemporary art world, rarely do they become accepted, because, the museums, the informed collectors and the contemporary art market ask the questions of why pretty pictures again? Why today? How is this advancing our understanding of art? How is this commenting on all we know about art? What are these poster-looking, perfectly designed illustrations proposing to the art world that we have not considered before? And so those questions need to be answered for pretty images to be seen as art. And pretty is not only an aesthetic concept, but it is also about the intentions and the way the artist is capable of expressing his artistic intent. You can have “pretty intentions,” and that, too will be challenged. Simple themes, simple concepts without historical and conceptual rigor, are torn down and debunked because why do we need pretty artistic intentions anymore? Why do we need to see images based on explorations of color or form, self-portraits as an exploration of self, the line between reality and fiction, and the list goes on... These ideas have already been explored to the depths of their possibilities and those explorations became movement in the past. To go down that path again is a matter of practicing or studying to be an artist, but the contemporary art world rarely could see this as a proposal to move forward the world of art. So, you see, a plea for difficult images is a plea to be committed, respectful, thoughtful, and innovative. We cannot move forward, as in all practices that thrive on “the new,” without committing to understanding and challenging what came before. Science asks this of us, technology asks this, literature asks this, and cinema, too. We need pretty images, but they should only be a path to something way more profound. To do and understand art takes time, vulnerability, and a willingness to change… not everyone is willing to take that path. (Healed by Jess Mac)
0:42

A Plea for Difficult Images (A small rant about what I think art is today) Why does the contemporary art world embrace the ugly, the every day, the absurd, the nonsensical, and the visually and conceptually challenging? Why is that? You know this is the case because, 5 out 10 times, you come out of a contemporary art museum asking: What just happened!? What the f*** is this? Why is this art? Well, it is a long story, but let's start with something basic, like, pretty, beautiful images have been done ad infinitum up until the 20th century. Every pretty sunset, cityscape, landscape, still life, and portrait has been done before to perfection. You just need to open up a history of art book, and you will find hundreds of examples of pretty images. The challenge for artists after the invention of the photographic camera, which rendered things so perfectly, was to see other things. The challenge for artists today is to see the world differently: ugly, weird, absurd, unrecognizable. The artist´s mission suddenly became to ask questions and to think and represent differently: art is the place where we can have no certainty; where it is ok to make no sense and just present questions. Beautiful things still get made. Cute is still a thing in 21st-century art, But for completely different reasons. Beauty is not done for beauty's sake, but to challenge why we would, after thousands of years, still want to see beautiful images. Abstract art was once a f*** you to the establishment. But ever since the world tamed it, abstract art has become decorative at best. The last moment or revival of this form was called "Zombie Formalism" for it´s complacent visuals with "modernist and expressionistic styles,” which worked perfectly to please collectors interested in flipping works of art they did not understand from emerging artists who essentially crafted hundreds of generic images indistinguishable from one another. Contemporary art has moved into a space where artists tend to challenge art and beauty. They´ve become philosophers of the image, and in doing so, they have left many viewers perplexed and confused as to what exactly it is that they are witnessing or supposed to connect with. It seems that art today asks viewers and collectors to go on the same trip that the artist has gone through: understand thousands of years of art, read all the books that questioned why that was all made, and experiment with them in what can be considered art today. For those curious about art and collecting, they usually come to art with a blank slate and arrive at pretty pictures and, as many viewers for thousands of years, enjoy what they are looking at. The creators of those pretty pictures call themselves artists, and so it seems the system works. But when those pretty pictures escape the niche they are produced in and try to mingle with the contemporary art world, rarely do they become accepted, because, the museums, the informed collectors and the contemporary art market ask the questions of why pretty pictures again? Why today? How is this advancing our understanding of art? How is this commenting on all we know about art? What are these poster-looking, perfectly designed illustrations proposing to the art world that we have not considered before? And so those questions need to be answered for pretty images to be seen as art. And pretty is not only an aesthetic concept, but it is also about the intentions and the way the artist is capable of expressing his artistic intent. You can have “pretty intentions,” and that, too will be challenged. Simple themes, simple concepts without historical and conceptual rigor, are torn down and debunked because why do we need pretty artistic intentions anymore? Why do we need to see images based on explorations of color or form, self-portraits as an exploration of self, the line between reality and fiction, and the list goes on... These ideas have already been explored to the depths of their possibilities and those explorations became movement in the past. To go down that path again is a matter of practicing or studying to be an artist, but the contemporary art world rarely could see this as a proposal to move forward the world of art. So, you see, a plea for difficult images is a plea to be committed, respectful, thoughtful, and innovative. We cannot move forward, as in all practices that thrive on “the new,” without committing to understanding and challenging what came before. Science asks this of us, technology asks this, literature asks this, and cinema, too. We need pretty images, but they should only be a path to something way more profound. To do and understand art takes time, vulnerability, and a willingness to change… not everyone is willing to take that path. (Healed by Jess Mac)

alejandro cartagena

41,148 次观看 • 2 年前

🫍 There's a story behind this drink. I'll tell later. —— 🐻‍❄ "Ohh Nong New, I'm a Polca and a Peraya as well" 🫍 But before this, what did she do? 🐻‍❄ So I wanted to order snacks. Their shop closes at 4 but I was there at 3:57 so I asked if they're still open and they said they still open. I saw some snacks and wanted to eat it, but it will take time to prepare, right? and I was considering their closing time. So I asked which one I can still order, she said "You can order anything, we can do any menu" but I went bipolar mode, I changed my mind after few minutes. Because I have work next, I have to drive next, and it would be difficult. I said I'll then just take the drink, so I can take away. The lady said something with her staff like, "Then why did he ask?" 🫍 But at the time, she was inside, right? 🐻‍❄ Yes, and because she's familiar with my voice, she then go out to see me. Turns out, she knows me. 🐻‍❄ She then gave me some snacks. It's so delicious. The matcha also delicious. She also gave some for Khun Tay. 🫍 Thank you, it's delicious.
0:04

🫍 There's a story behind this drink. I'll tell later. —— 🐻‍❄ "Ohh Nong New, I'm a Polca and a Peraya as well" 🫍 But before this, what did she do? 🐻‍❄ So I wanted to order snacks. Their shop closes at 4 but I was there at 3:57 so I asked if they're still open and they said they still open. I saw some snacks and wanted to eat it, but it will take time to prepare, right? and I was considering their closing time. So I asked which one I can still order, she said "You can order anything, we can do any menu" but I went bipolar mode, I changed my mind after few minutes. Because I have work next, I have to drive next, and it would be difficult. I said I'll then just take the drink, so I can take away. The lady said something with her staff like, "Then why did he ask?" 🫍 But at the time, she was inside, right? 🐻‍❄ Yes, and because she's familiar with my voice, she then go out to see me. Turns out, she knows me. 🐻‍❄ She then gave me some snacks. It's so delicious. The matcha also delicious. She also gave some for Khun Tay. 🫍 Thank you, it's delicious.

deeコ

15,112 次观看 • 10 天前

Americans are tired of airlines changing their trips and there’s nothing they can do about it “I can't even explain the absolute rage and pit of despair that I feel when I get an email from an airline that says, "We've made a small change to your upcoming trip." Because every time I get an email like this I know I'm gonna open it and I'm just going to get absolutely screwed by the airline and have nothing that I can possibly do about it” This woman made a booking and was very careful with the longer times, she paid extra to make sure the locations of the layovers were at airports with low risk of weather events She did this because she has a wedding to go to that she can’t miss But then the airline says they’ve changed all that, she now is at a different airport with the lowest possible layover legally allowed, so it’ll be very easy to miss the next flight She called and the supervisor said it’s legally allowed so she’s stuck with it Companies in America have been getting away with murder for far too long. We are no longer valued customers, we’re just treated like a number
2:28

Americans are tired of airlines changing their trips and there’s nothing they can do about it “I can't even explain the absolute rage and pit of despair that I feel when I get an email from an airline that says, "We've made a small change to your upcoming trip." Because every time I get an email like this I know I'm gonna open it and I'm just going to get absolutely screwed by the airline and have nothing that I can possibly do about it” This woman made a booking and was very careful with the longer times, she paid extra to make sure the locations of the layovers were at airports with low risk of weather events She did this because she has a wedding to go to that she can’t miss But then the airline says they’ve changed all that, she now is at a different airport with the lowest possible layover legally allowed, so it’ll be very easy to miss the next flight She called and the supervisor said it’s legally allowed so she’s stuck with it Companies in America have been getting away with murder for far too long. We are no longer valued customers, we’re just treated like a number

Wall Street Apes

92,793 次观看 • 19 天前

thank you Jung Wooyoung… i saw this edit on tiktok and... i'm grateful that something pushed me to discover Ateez a year ago. sometimes i'm mad at myself for being so late with that. but still – better late than never… i never would have thought someone would come into my heart again, like bands/musicians did when i was a teenager. because how could that be possible? i'm already in my twenties, how could i ever love someone like that again? however, things turned out differently than i expected... from the moment my sister showed me Ateez, i said something like "i think Wooyoung is the coolest..." or "i like Wooyoung the most" and so it just stayed that way i didn't think that my stubborn mind and heart would be able to have a new idol – an idol who is from a completely different world than what i was used to… maybe this world has been with me for some time, and one person has been showing me all this time what i was missing, but entering it last year, when life was terribly fucked up… changed my thinking a bit (life maybe too) i love to love Wooyoung thank you Wooyoung for existing… for saving what was left of my life last year i know these are big words and maybe even a bit tacky... but that's how i feel Wooyoung seemed to show me that there was something more beyond the edge i saw. his voice, his words, his smile, his laugh, and the way his eyes sparkle… he somehow brings me back down to earth. he adds something to my life that's missing – maybe that's why i'm still here so i'll be grateful for that, no matter how it sounds. cheesy or tacky or weird- because maybe half the world knows this flower... but only this flower showed that all petals are beautiful //sorry for that rant…
1:32

thank you Jung Wooyoung… i saw this edit on tiktok and... i'm grateful that something pushed me to discover Ateez a year ago. sometimes i'm mad at myself for being so late with that. but still – better late than never… i never would have thought someone would come into my heart again, like bands/musicians did when i was a teenager. because how could that be possible? i'm already in my twenties, how could i ever love someone like that again? however, things turned out differently than i expected... from the moment my sister showed me Ateez, i said something like "i think Wooyoung is the coolest..." or "i like Wooyoung the most" and so it just stayed that way i didn't think that my stubborn mind and heart would be able to have a new idol – an idol who is from a completely different world than what i was used to… maybe this world has been with me for some time, and one person has been showing me all this time what i was missing, but entering it last year, when life was terribly fucked up… changed my thinking a bit (life maybe too) i love to love Wooyoung thank you Wooyoung for existing… for saving what was left of my life last year i know these are big words and maybe even a bit tacky... but that's how i feel Wooyoung seemed to show me that there was something more beyond the edge i saw. his voice, his words, his smile, his laugh, and the way his eyes sparkle… he somehow brings me back down to earth. he adds something to my life that's missing – maybe that's why i'm still here so i'll be grateful for that, no matter how it sounds. cheesy or tacky or weird- because maybe half the world knows this flower... but only this flower showed that all petals are beautiful //sorry for that rant…

dagmi ༊*·˚ is seeing Ateez

13,521 次观看 • 6 个月前

The Wikipedia wars As Wikipedia approaches its 25th anniversary in 2026, its open editing model faces a growing challenge: coordinated edit wars. In these campaigns, Kremlin-aligned actors try to rewrite history, launder disinformation, and lock distorted narratives into one of the world’s most trusted reference platforms. Founded on the idea that volunteers could collaboratively build a neutral, reliable encyclopaedia, Wikipedia has become one of the most influential information platforms ever created. It is often described as the world’s largest crowd-sourced knowledge project, built on consensus and verifiable sources. In recent years, however, it has also become a frontline in geopolitical information warfare. This is most visible in so-called edit wars: prolonged conflicts where opposing groups repeatedly overwrite and revise articles to control historical narratives. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, these battles have intensified. Kremlin-aligned actors have systematically targeted articles related to Eastern Europe, the Soviet past, and contemporary political leaders. Estonia and especially EU leader Kaja Kallas, Estonia’s former prime minister, have been frequent targets. What are edit wars? An edit war happens when editors repeatedly change the same content instead of resolving disputes through discussion. Wikipedia officially discourages this behaviour and emphasises consensus, neutrality, and reliable sources. In practice, however, edit wars can and do break out. Coordinated editors can use endurance, procedural rules, and administrator complaints to exhaust good faith contributors. The goal is rarely to win a single argument. Instead, it is to wear down opposition, freeze pages at favourable moments, and normalise contested language. Once a page is locked or protected, the version in place gains a sense of legitimacy, even if it reflects a distorted view. Edit wars exploit open systems, operate over long periods, and aim to embed manipulated narratives into reference material rather than spreading short-lived falsehoods. Multiple investigations show that Wikipedia manipulation increased sharply after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Russian-language Wikipedia and parts of the English version became arenas for systematic narrative control, especially as independent Russian media was shut down. Wikipedia’s openness, once a strength, had suddenly become a vulnerability. Coordinated editor networks have worked to soften descriptions of Russian aggression, reframe invasions as ‘conflicts’, and question the legitimacy of post-Soviet states. These efforts rely on subtle wording changes, selective sourcing, and procedural tactics rather than obvious vandalism. Estonia and EU officials as targets Estonia shows how edit wars are used for historical revisionism and political influence. Since 2022, English-language Wikipedia articles about Estonia’s history, statehood, and politics have faced sustained pressure. One recurring tactic has been changing the birthplaces of hundreds of Estonian public figures from ‘Estonia’ to ‘Estonian SSR, Soviet Union’, despite the legal consensus that Estonia was occupied, not legitimately incorporated, by the USSR between 1940 and 1991. This is not a minor wording issue. Calling Estonia a ‘Soviet republic’ supports the Russian claim that the Baltic states voluntarily joined the USSR and directly contradicts the position of Estonia, the EU, NATO countries, and international law. Historical topics have also been targeted. The Estonian War of Independence between 1918 and 1920 has at times been reframed as an ‘offensive campaign’ or ‘separatism from Russia’, language that closely mirrors contemporary Kremlin rhetoric. High-profile figures are especially vulnerable because their pages attract constant attention and frequent administrative action. The Wikipedia article on Kaja Kallas has repeatedly been edited to reflect Russian-aligned interpretations of history and geopolitics. At key moments, the page was locked while these contested narratives were in place, blocking corrective edits. Page protection, meant to prevent disruption, instead helped freeze a favourable version of the article. This shows how procedural tools can be exploited as effectively as false information. Why Wikipedia matters Wikipedia is not just another website. It ranks highly in search results and serves as a default reference for journalists, students, policymakers, and the public. Winning an edit war on Wikipedia helps turn contested narratives into global ‘common knowledge’. For Kremlin-aligned actors, this makes Wikipedia a valuable target. Making small wording changes, downplaying occupation, reframing wars, and questioning democratic legitimacy can slowly erode our understanding of history and present-day aggression. Estonia’s experience shows how smaller states are especially exposed. Because Wikipedia is also a core source for AI systems, the stakes are even higher. Recent studies indicate that Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for ChatGPT, effectively serving as a foundational knowledge base for how the AI understands and retrieves information. Manipulating articles today can therefore shape how future technologies understand, reproduce, and repeat history. This practice is referred to as LLM grooming, the deliberate attempt to influence large language models by seeding biased or distorted narratives into the sources they rely on. The rise in Wikipedia edit wars since 2022 reflects a broader shift in information warfare. Instead of loud propaganda, actors now use procedural, platform-native manipulation. Estonian history and Kaja Kallas are not isolated cases but targets of coordinated action. And as long as open-knowledge platforms shape how societies understand history and politics, sites like Wikipedia will remain contested ground.
0:32

The Wikipedia wars As Wikipedia approaches its 25th anniversary in 2026, its open editing model faces a growing challenge: coordinated edit wars. In these campaigns, Kremlin-aligned actors try to rewrite history, launder disinformation, and lock distorted narratives into one of the world’s most trusted reference platforms. Founded on the idea that volunteers could collaboratively build a neutral, reliable encyclopaedia, Wikipedia has become one of the most influential information platforms ever created. It is often described as the world’s largest crowd-sourced knowledge project, built on consensus and verifiable sources. In recent years, however, it has also become a frontline in geopolitical information warfare. This is most visible in so-called edit wars: prolonged conflicts where opposing groups repeatedly overwrite and revise articles to control historical narratives. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, these battles have intensified. Kremlin-aligned actors have systematically targeted articles related to Eastern Europe, the Soviet past, and contemporary political leaders. Estonia and especially EU leader Kaja Kallas, Estonia’s former prime minister, have been frequent targets. What are edit wars? An edit war happens when editors repeatedly change the same content instead of resolving disputes through discussion. Wikipedia officially discourages this behaviour and emphasises consensus, neutrality, and reliable sources. In practice, however, edit wars can and do break out. Coordinated editors can use endurance, procedural rules, and administrator complaints to exhaust good faith contributors. The goal is rarely to win a single argument. Instead, it is to wear down opposition, freeze pages at favourable moments, and normalise contested language. Once a page is locked or protected, the version in place gains a sense of legitimacy, even if it reflects a distorted view. Edit wars exploit open systems, operate over long periods, and aim to embed manipulated narratives into reference material rather than spreading short-lived falsehoods. Multiple investigations show that Wikipedia manipulation increased sharply after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Russian-language Wikipedia and parts of the English version became arenas for systematic narrative control, especially as independent Russian media was shut down. Wikipedia’s openness, once a strength, had suddenly become a vulnerability. Coordinated editor networks have worked to soften descriptions of Russian aggression, reframe invasions as ‘conflicts’, and question the legitimacy of post-Soviet states. These efforts rely on subtle wording changes, selective sourcing, and procedural tactics rather than obvious vandalism. Estonia and EU officials as targets Estonia shows how edit wars are used for historical revisionism and political influence. Since 2022, English-language Wikipedia articles about Estonia’s history, statehood, and politics have faced sustained pressure. One recurring tactic has been changing the birthplaces of hundreds of Estonian public figures from ‘Estonia’ to ‘Estonian SSR, Soviet Union’, despite the legal consensus that Estonia was occupied, not legitimately incorporated, by the USSR between 1940 and 1991. This is not a minor wording issue. Calling Estonia a ‘Soviet republic’ supports the Russian claim that the Baltic states voluntarily joined the USSR and directly contradicts the position of Estonia, the EU, NATO countries, and international law. Historical topics have also been targeted. The Estonian War of Independence between 1918 and 1920 has at times been reframed as an ‘offensive campaign’ or ‘separatism from Russia’, language that closely mirrors contemporary Kremlin rhetoric. High-profile figures are especially vulnerable because their pages attract constant attention and frequent administrative action. The Wikipedia article on Kaja Kallas has repeatedly been edited to reflect Russian-aligned interpretations of history and geopolitics. At key moments, the page was locked while these contested narratives were in place, blocking corrective edits. Page protection, meant to prevent disruption, instead helped freeze a favourable version of the article. This shows how procedural tools can be exploited as effectively as false information. Why Wikipedia matters Wikipedia is not just another website. It ranks highly in search results and serves as a default reference for journalists, students, policymakers, and the public. Winning an edit war on Wikipedia helps turn contested narratives into global ‘common knowledge’. For Kremlin-aligned actors, this makes Wikipedia a valuable target. Making small wording changes, downplaying occupation, reframing wars, and questioning democratic legitimacy can slowly erode our understanding of history and present-day aggression. Estonia’s experience shows how smaller states are especially exposed. Because Wikipedia is also a core source for AI systems, the stakes are even higher. Recent studies indicate that Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for ChatGPT, effectively serving as a foundational knowledge base for how the AI understands and retrieves information. Manipulating articles today can therefore shape how future technologies understand, reproduce, and repeat history. This practice is referred to as LLM grooming, the deliberate attempt to influence large language models by seeding biased or distorted narratives into the sources they rely on. The rise in Wikipedia edit wars since 2022 reflects a broader shift in information warfare. Instead of loud propaganda, actors now use procedural, platform-native manipulation. Estonian history and Kaja Kallas are not isolated cases but targets of coordinated action. And as long as open-knowledge platforms shape how societies understand history and politics, sites like Wikipedia will remain contested ground.

EUvsDisinfo

343,369 次观看 • 6 个月前

Scottie Scheffler elaborated on the Bryson DeChambeau rule incident from Friday and echoed Harris English’s comments about Bryson always being on TV and camera angles being different to what’s happening: “No. I've been really focused on the tournament. I think that opens up a greater discussion that -- all I can really say is I think maybe we need to be a little bit more strict in the way that we are policing guys, but it's a little bit of a balance because you've got certain guys like a Bryson who every shot he hits is going to be shown on TV. When you have camera angles that are far away, things can look different than they do when you're right there. “We've done a good job of -- I don't know, I hate saying stuff out here because I don't want anything to get taken out of context. All I'll say is Bryson, I've known him for a long time, and he's a lot of things, but he's definitely not a cheater. I've never seen him cheat once, whether we were having a putting contest on the putting green or chipping contest, or anytime we played amateur golf, I never saw anything suspicious. “When you're watching him there from that camera angle, maybe he was a touch careless around his ball, but I don't think he did anything intentionally. “We've seen penalties happen with -- like you remember Jon Rahm a couple years ago at the Memorial when his ball moved in the rough, and it's like to the naked eye, can you really tell that? “I think sometimes it's just a difficult position in the game of golf. When I was growing up, if this was the line between things that were -- like if this was the line, here are the rules and this was the right side of it and this is when you're doing things against the rule, you always tried to stray really far that way. I feel like at times, sometimes you see players maybe push it a little bit further than they should. “I think we need to kind of get back to the traditions of the game and maybe we do need to police things a little bit more stricter in the game. “But like I said, it's a tough line to kind of cross. So that's why it's hard for me to say anything like this. Bryson is a guy that I've known for a really long time. Like I said, he's not a cheater.” The Open
2:04

Scottie Scheffler elaborated on the Bryson DeChambeau rule incident from Friday and echoed Harris English’s comments about Bryson always being on TV and camera angles being different to what’s happening: “No. I've been really focused on the tournament. I think that opens up a greater discussion that -- all I can really say is I think maybe we need to be a little bit more strict in the way that we are policing guys, but it's a little bit of a balance because you've got certain guys like a Bryson who every shot he hits is going to be shown on TV. When you have camera angles that are far away, things can look different than they do when you're right there. “We've done a good job of -- I don't know, I hate saying stuff out here because I don't want anything to get taken out of context. All I'll say is Bryson, I've known him for a long time, and he's a lot of things, but he's definitely not a cheater. I've never seen him cheat once, whether we were having a putting contest on the putting green or chipping contest, or anytime we played amateur golf, I never saw anything suspicious. “When you're watching him there from that camera angle, maybe he was a touch careless around his ball, but I don't think he did anything intentionally. “We've seen penalties happen with -- like you remember Jon Rahm a couple years ago at the Memorial when his ball moved in the rough, and it's like to the naked eye, can you really tell that? “I think sometimes it's just a difficult position in the game of golf. When I was growing up, if this was the line between things that were -- like if this was the line, here are the rules and this was the right side of it and this is when you're doing things against the rule, you always tried to stray really far that way. I feel like at times, sometimes you see players maybe push it a little bit further than they should. “I think we need to kind of get back to the traditions of the game and maybe we do need to police things a little bit more stricter in the game. “But like I said, it's a tough line to kind of cross. So that's why it's hard for me to say anything like this. Bryson is a guy that I've known for a really long time. Like I said, he's not a cheater.” The Open

Flushing It

1,025,700 次观看 • 1 个月前

This video gives a rare glimpse into the "fishy" proclivities of wolves in our area. The video was taken in spring just a short distance from a creek wolves have fished at for many years. This past spring was the 10th year we have documented wolves hunting and catching fish—a behavior that had not been documented in boreal systems such as ours until our work, in part, because it is a tough behavior to observe. What is particularly fascinating is that this wolf was not only carrying a fish but carrying two of them. This is interesting because when we captured this behavior on video for the first time in 2018, we observed a wolf fishing, drop them on the creek bank, and wade back in to continue fishing. I.e., the wolf was not immediately consuming the fish it caught but rather fishing while the fishing was hot, and then once the fishing cooled down, would consume the fish. And this video seems to provide some additional evidence that it might be a widespread strategy wolves use. Two other interesting tidbits from this video: 1.) The wolf that dropped the fish was a yearling wolf. The wolf that grabbed the fish at the end was a different wolf. More specifically, the breeding female of the Half-Moon Pack and the older sister of the yearling wolf. 2.) Surprisingly, the black bear seemed very perplexed at finding this fish, and just left it alone without even taking a little nibble. We would have expected a bear to readily take a free meal like this but apparently not. We have collected of detailed information on how, when, where, and why wolves hunt fish in our area. You can read all about that in our scientific article (which is freely-available at the link below!): Freund et al. 2023. The ethology of wolves foraging on freshwater fish in a boreal ecosystem. Royal Society Open Science.
1:20

This video gives a rare glimpse into the "fishy" proclivities of wolves in our area. The video was taken in spring just a short distance from a creek wolves have fished at for many years. This past spring was the 10th year we have documented wolves hunting and catching fish—a behavior that had not been documented in boreal systems such as ours until our work, in part, because it is a tough behavior to observe. What is particularly fascinating is that this wolf was not only carrying a fish but carrying two of them. This is interesting because when we captured this behavior on video for the first time in 2018, we observed a wolf fishing, drop them on the creek bank, and wade back in to continue fishing. I.e., the wolf was not immediately consuming the fish it caught but rather fishing while the fishing was hot, and then once the fishing cooled down, would consume the fish. And this video seems to provide some additional evidence that it might be a widespread strategy wolves use. Two other interesting tidbits from this video: 1.) The wolf that dropped the fish was a yearling wolf. The wolf that grabbed the fish at the end was a different wolf. More specifically, the breeding female of the Half-Moon Pack and the older sister of the yearling wolf. 2.) Surprisingly, the black bear seemed very perplexed at finding this fish, and just left it alone without even taking a little nibble. We would have expected a bear to readily take a free meal like this but apparently not. We have collected of detailed information on how, when, where, and why wolves hunt fish in our area. You can read all about that in our scientific article (which is freely-available at the link below!): Freund et al. 2023. The ethology of wolves foraging on freshwater fish in a boreal ecosystem. Royal Society Open Science.

Voyageurs Wolf Project

36,519 次观看 • 6 个月前

John Huston on working with Clark Gable in "The Misfits" (1961): "One of the myths attached to 'The Misfits' was that Clark Gable d!ed of a heart attack because of over-exertion in this film. That is utter nonsense. Toward the end of the picture there was a contest between Clark and the stallion the cowboys had captured. It looked like rough work, and it was, but it was the stunt men who were thrown around, not Clark. I got on well with Clark. I spent many hours with him in his trailer— thanks to Marilyn. He thought of himself as an actor, not a screen personality. He liked reminiscing about his early days in the theater—old-time actors’ talk. I saw very soon that Clark knew exactly what he was doing. Two or three times I thought I saw ways to improve his performance. I was mistaken. Each time I had him go back to his own way. He was nonplussed by Marilyn’s behavior. It was as though she’d revealed some horrid fact of life that just couldn’t be accepted in his scheme of things. Because I edit as I go along, Clark got to see the first cut of the film, and he was delighted. The picture was way over budget. It would cost about $4,000,000—and that was a lot of money in those days for a black- and-white film. Clark said, “Hell, John! If the studio is unhappy about the cost, I’ll buy this picture for four million dollars. I think it’s the best thing I've ever done. Now all I want is to see that kid of mine born!” That was on November 4, and he was due to become a father in February. It wasn’t to be. He suffered a heart attack on November 5 and died less than two weeks later. Because of Clark’s death and the tragedy of seeing Marilyn slowly destroying herself, my memories of 'The Misfits' are mostly melancholy. But there were some good moments, too." ("An Open Book", John Huston, 1980) P.S: Remembering the legendary American filmmaker John Huston on his 120th birthday!
1:34

John Huston on working with Clark Gable in "The Misfits" (1961): "One of the myths attached to 'The Misfits' was that Clark Gable d!ed of a heart attack because of over-exertion in this film. That is utter nonsense. Toward the end of the picture there was a contest between Clark and the stallion the cowboys had captured. It looked like rough work, and it was, but it was the stunt men who were thrown around, not Clark. I got on well with Clark. I spent many hours with him in his trailer— thanks to Marilyn. He thought of himself as an actor, not a screen personality. He liked reminiscing about his early days in the theater—old-time actors’ talk. I saw very soon that Clark knew exactly what he was doing. Two or three times I thought I saw ways to improve his performance. I was mistaken. Each time I had him go back to his own way. He was nonplussed by Marilyn’s behavior. It was as though she’d revealed some horrid fact of life that just couldn’t be accepted in his scheme of things. Because I edit as I go along, Clark got to see the first cut of the film, and he was delighted. The picture was way over budget. It would cost about $4,000,000—and that was a lot of money in those days for a black- and-white film. Clark said, “Hell, John! If the studio is unhappy about the cost, I’ll buy this picture for four million dollars. I think it’s the best thing I've ever done. Now all I want is to see that kid of mine born!” That was on November 4, and he was due to become a father in February. It wasn’t to be. He suffered a heart attack on November 5 and died less than two weeks later. Because of Clark’s death and the tragedy of seeing Marilyn slowly destroying herself, my memories of 'The Misfits' are mostly melancholy. But there were some good moments, too." ("An Open Book", John Huston, 1980) P.S: Remembering the legendary American filmmaker John Huston on his 120th birthday!

DepressedBergman

48,985 次观看 • 23 天前

Been using Nous Research Hermes Agent for media editing and it completely replaced my workflow. You know the drill : - Trim a video - open CapCut. - Convert to mp3 - another site. - Remove audio - another one. - Make a gif - yet another one. - more tasks, more different tools minutes of uploading and downloading.. Now you can do all of that just by chatting like asking a designer friend to edit your media and getting it back instantly :) I built a media toolset for Hermes that handles all of this natively. It registers as a skill inside the agent - Hermes sees your video, understands what you're asking, takes the right operations and use the best skills and give you what you really wanted perfectly ▪️ Trim any segment down to the second ▪️ Speed up or slow down with pitch corrected audio ▪️ Compress without destroying quality ▪️ Create a gif on defined times range ▪️ Cut the video and rotate it and apply instagram ▪️ Convert between any format - mp4, mp3, ogg, webm ▪️ Chain edits: "trim 0:30 1:00 and speed up 1.5x and compress" ▪️ Burn .srt subtitles directly into the video ▪️ Add or remove text watermarks with custom position ▪️ Generate thumbnails from any timestamp ▪️ Fade in/out with custom duration ▪️ ASCII video art with multiple character styles and many more with customizable skills Works the same on Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp etc. This is what agents should be doing and Hermes does.
3:01

Been using Nous Research Hermes Agent for media editing and it completely replaced my workflow. You know the drill : - Trim a video - open CapCut. - Convert to mp3 - another site. - Remove audio - another one. - Make a gif - yet another one. - more tasks, more different tools minutes of uploading and downloading.. Now you can do all of that just by chatting like asking a designer friend to edit your media and getting it back instantly :) I built a media toolset for Hermes that handles all of this natively. It registers as a skill inside the agent - Hermes sees your video, understands what you're asking, takes the right operations and use the best skills and give you what you really wanted perfectly ▪️ Trim any segment down to the second ▪️ Speed up or slow down with pitch corrected audio ▪️ Compress without destroying quality ▪️ Create a gif on defined times range ▪️ Cut the video and rotate it and apply instagram ▪️ Convert between any format - mp4, mp3, ogg, webm ▪️ Chain edits: "trim 0:30 1:00 and speed up 1.5x and compress" ▪️ Burn .srt subtitles directly into the video ▪️ Add or remove text watermarks with custom position ▪️ Generate thumbnails from any timestamp ▪️ Fade in/out with custom duration ▪️ ASCII video art with multiple character styles and many more with customizable skills Works the same on Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp etc. This is what agents should be doing and Hermes does.

ogichain

11,291 次观看 • 5 个月前

Recently I got some hands-on time with Crimson Desert and below are my first impressions as well as some of the gameplay I was able to capture. Crimson Desert is a good game, but it won’t be for everyone. I know the devs claim this isn’t an RPG, but I don’t know any other way to describe this game other than a HARDCORE action RPG. If you need the yellow paint to know where to climb this game isn’t for you. But if you love getting lost in a whimsical world with a boat load of content this game is going to be right up your alley. I think what impressed me most is the attention to detail. There’s so many little things the dev team took into consideration that I think people who enjoy being immersed into a world are going to appreciate. Even if you aren’t that person; on a basic level I think most will enjoy the game's combat. It’s fast, fluid and provides a ton of player expression with its deep skill tree. The world of Pywel is vibrant, large in scale and full of life. It’s easy to get lost off the main quest line as there’s always something to do and someone to speak to. An example being I was wandering through the open world and encountered a distressed woman seeking help. I agreed to follow her only to find out moments later she was with a gang and they were trying to back door me. That had me cracking up. I think if the open world is consistently full of fun, unique side content like that & the main quest line is fire this game has a lot of potential to impress. It’s just a shame that I didn’t get to spend more time with the main quests as I kept getting side tracked with cool stuff to do in the open world. So I can’t give you much insight into that. What I can say is after the opening section there’s NEXT TO NO tutorials in this game, the puzzles are hard & the default controls are a bit clunky. You will be getting lost and I can see that frustrating some people who aren’t interested in a challenge. That’s why I mentioned earlier that this is a hardcore RPG. It does not do a lot of hand holding. Because of that I predict you and your friends will be sharing tips and tricks similar to when Elden Ring first launched and nobody knew what they were doing. If you are a patient person and take the time to learn the game's systems I promise you will be able to put together some awesome combos that will make you feel like the main character. My biggest fear for this game is that I won't finish it. Not because it’s a bad game, but I can just tell from my brief time with it that it’s next level massive. As someone who's been gaming for 30+ years it’s very rare you’ll hear me say a game was overwhelming, but this game is. For people who lack a ton of free time I can see that being a turn off because once again the game doesn’t give much direction or tutorials outside the opening area. Not to mention this game could be big just for the sake of being big. I was curious to know how much of the content was engaging versus just open world bloat? Hard to tell because I only got a few hours with the game. I also fear that the Ai isn’t the best in this game. The Ai issues I encountered zapped all immersion away for those moments. I’m not sure if the final build will differ from the vertical slice we played, but what I can tell you is that on the build we played I wasn’t impressed by the Ai. Several times I attacked enemy camps and they never reacted to me attacking them. They just stood there and took it which made the world feel less alive. There were also times where enemies were looking dead at me just standing still as the battle music played threatening to beat me up, but they never did anything. It was 3 or 4 times I encountered this poor Ai which is a red flag for me because I only got two hours of hands on time with the game. Mind you in those two hours a good portion of it was just me working my way through the prologue and the early quests, so I didn't spend a ton of time in the open world. What I'm trying to get at is the janky ai was very noticeable. It wasn't something that took long to find. I will say when the game works it's great, but when I tell you the Ai was bad at times it was bad. It reminded me of the dumb NPC’s often found in Ubisoft open world games. I’m not looking for this to be a Souls game but I want some level of challenge in the combat. Hopefully that stuff gets patched out. That being said, I’m confident in saying this game is good. I just didn’t have enough time with it to determine if it’s good, or GREAT. Only time will tell when Crimson Desert drops on March 19th, 2026 for the PC, PS5 and Xbox Series. Pros —---------- - Combat makes you feel like demon - Deep Skill tree - Vibrant world - Solid voice acting - Fire OST - The little details (trust system, you can commit crimes ect.) - No Fall damage - Puzzles are creative & challenging - Game doesn’t hold you hand (some people will hate this) - You can swap in and out of 3rd and 1st person at will. Wasn’t able to explore much of how that changes the game, but it’s nice that it's an option. - EASILY over 100hrs of content (some will hate this though) Cons —---------- - Clunky controls (Default controls take some time adjusting too. I hope there’s other control schemes at launch) - Inconsistent Ai (Ubisoft bad at times. sometimes the enemies wouldn’t attack during combat or act like they never saw you) - Long load times (we were playing on PC’s, but idk the specs) - Your horse can faint & when they do traveling the large world wasn’t as fun (and I couldn’t figure out how to get him back - most likely a skill issue) - Early stamina management is OD. Early game it’s easy to drown & get tired running. I’d imagine it gets better late game, but early game it’s frustrating trying to explore. - Camera takes some getting used to in combat. Sometimes its too close and others too far. - Early arrows have no impact. Felt useless. Hoping later upgrades fix that
3:17

Recently I got some hands-on time with Crimson Desert and below are my first impressions as well as some of the gameplay I was able to capture. Crimson Desert is a good game, but it won’t be for everyone. I know the devs claim this isn’t an RPG, but I don’t know any other way to describe this game other than a HARDCORE action RPG. If you need the yellow paint to know where to climb this game isn’t for you. But if you love getting lost in a whimsical world with a boat load of content this game is going to be right up your alley. I think what impressed me most is the attention to detail. There’s so many little things the dev team took into consideration that I think people who enjoy being immersed into a world are going to appreciate. Even if you aren’t that person; on a basic level I think most will enjoy the game's combat. It’s fast, fluid and provides a ton of player expression with its deep skill tree. The world of Pywel is vibrant, large in scale and full of life. It’s easy to get lost off the main quest line as there’s always something to do and someone to speak to. An example being I was wandering through the open world and encountered a distressed woman seeking help. I agreed to follow her only to find out moments later she was with a gang and they were trying to back door me. That had me cracking up. I think if the open world is consistently full of fun, unique side content like that & the main quest line is fire this game has a lot of potential to impress. It’s just a shame that I didn’t get to spend more time with the main quests as I kept getting side tracked with cool stuff to do in the open world. So I can’t give you much insight into that. What I can say is after the opening section there’s NEXT TO NO tutorials in this game, the puzzles are hard & the default controls are a bit clunky. You will be getting lost and I can see that frustrating some people who aren’t interested in a challenge. That’s why I mentioned earlier that this is a hardcore RPG. It does not do a lot of hand holding. Because of that I predict you and your friends will be sharing tips and tricks similar to when Elden Ring first launched and nobody knew what they were doing. If you are a patient person and take the time to learn the game's systems I promise you will be able to put together some awesome combos that will make you feel like the main character. My biggest fear for this game is that I won't finish it. Not because it’s a bad game, but I can just tell from my brief time with it that it’s next level massive. As someone who's been gaming for 30+ years it’s very rare you’ll hear me say a game was overwhelming, but this game is. For people who lack a ton of free time I can see that being a turn off because once again the game doesn’t give much direction or tutorials outside the opening area. Not to mention this game could be big just for the sake of being big. I was curious to know how much of the content was engaging versus just open world bloat? Hard to tell because I only got a few hours with the game. I also fear that the Ai isn’t the best in this game. The Ai issues I encountered zapped all immersion away for those moments. I’m not sure if the final build will differ from the vertical slice we played, but what I can tell you is that on the build we played I wasn’t impressed by the Ai. Several times I attacked enemy camps and they never reacted to me attacking them. They just stood there and took it which made the world feel less alive. There were also times where enemies were looking dead at me just standing still as the battle music played threatening to beat me up, but they never did anything. It was 3 or 4 times I encountered this poor Ai which is a red flag for me because I only got two hours of hands on time with the game. Mind you in those two hours a good portion of it was just me working my way through the prologue and the early quests, so I didn't spend a ton of time in the open world. What I'm trying to get at is the janky ai was very noticeable. It wasn't something that took long to find. I will say when the game works it's great, but when I tell you the Ai was bad at times it was bad. It reminded me of the dumb NPC’s often found in Ubisoft open world games. I’m not looking for this to be a Souls game but I want some level of challenge in the combat. Hopefully that stuff gets patched out. That being said, I’m confident in saying this game is good. I just didn’t have enough time with it to determine if it’s good, or GREAT. Only time will tell when Crimson Desert drops on March 19th, 2026 for the PC, PS5 and Xbox Series. Pros —---------- - Combat makes you feel like demon - Deep Skill tree - Vibrant world - Solid voice acting - Fire OST - The little details (trust system, you can commit crimes ect.) - No Fall damage - Puzzles are creative & challenging - Game doesn’t hold you hand (some people will hate this) - You can swap in and out of 3rd and 1st person at will. Wasn’t able to explore much of how that changes the game, but it’s nice that it's an option. - EASILY over 100hrs of content (some will hate this though) Cons —---------- - Clunky controls (Default controls take some time adjusting too. I hope there’s other control schemes at launch) - Inconsistent Ai (Ubisoft bad at times. sometimes the enemies wouldn’t attack during combat or act like they never saw you) - Long load times (we were playing on PC’s, but idk the specs) - Your horse can faint & when they do traveling the large world wasn’t as fun (and I couldn’t figure out how to get him back - most likely a skill issue) - Early stamina management is OD. Early game it’s easy to drown & get tired running. I’d imagine it gets better late game, but early game it’s frustrating trying to explore. - Camera takes some getting used to in combat. Sometimes its too close and others too far. - Early arrows have no impact. Felt useless. Hoping later upgrades fix that

The Black Hokage

1,175,183 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 A FOREIGN AGENT DIDN'T INFILTRATE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MEDIA. HE WAS HANDED THE KEYS, THE BUILDING, AND THE AUDIENCE. 🚨 January 2025. Salem Media. 900 stations: News, podcasts, "shows", and plenty of information dumps. This is just a small example of the reach this mess has gotten to and/or currently working directly under⬇️ Charlie Kirk's show (shamelessly still posting on his page) Dennis Prager Sebastian Gorka DrG Josh Hammer Lara Trump Brandon Tatum toddstarnes Hugh Hewitt LarryElderShow Townhall.com RedState HotAir.com PJ Media Breitbart News ecosystem Fox News amplification Rumble 🏴‍☠️ distribution (explains a lot actually) Daily Wire DailyWire+ cross-promotion. Benny Johnson (not salem owned but deeply embedded) Michael Knowles Matt Walsh Ben Shapiro All Daily Wire. Not Salem but the content pipeline runs parallel and the guest sharing is constant. (making sense yet?) Mark R. Levin oh the little man... I almost forgot about the little one... Westwood One syndication but completely embedded in the Salem content universe. Laura Ingraham Fox amplification tier. Same narrative. Same guests. Same framing. New York Post opinion section- prints what the ecosystem produces. Washington Examiner for more narrative amplification TheBlaze & Glenn Beck Glenn Beck's operation. Deeply cross-pollinated with all of the propaganda artists under Brad Parscale. PragerU Prager University. Specifically targeting young people with video content designed to look educational. Millions of views per video. Real America's Voice (RAV) American Voice Media. Smaller but specifically designed to reach the audience that thinks even Fox is too mainstream. AND THE ONE EVERYONE IS SLEEPING ON... Google Because the SEO & GEO architecture that Parscale's contract explicitly describes building is designed to determine what every single one of those platforms' audiences finds when they search. Add this mess on top why don't we? 👇 AI training data being rewritten at the source level to shape what your search results tell you before you even know what question to ask. Building GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) websites that strategically inject Large Language Models like ChatGPT Claude Grok Gemini how about ANY AI model since that is how this technology is built to work. The content farms feed the algorithm. The algorithm feeds the audience. The audience feeds the belief system. And the belief system feeds the vote. 🤦MAN do you all have a lot to learn about this special apparatus they've built against the American Conservative consumer. That is not a social media campaign. That is a full spectrum takeover of the information architecture that tens of millions of Americans use to form their understanding of the world. Radio. Digital. SEO. AI. Independent media trust transfer. All of it. This crap has been running full-throttle since January 2025 while every single host it produced called Tucker Carlson compromised by foreign influence. The infiltration did not start in September 2025 when the filing became public. That is just when concealment became legally impossible. The infiltration started the moment he walked through Salem's door in January 2025 and nobody told a single host, a single listener, or a single viewer what was being built inside the organization they trusted. And then it spreads. Because that is exactly how ecosystem capture works. It does not stay inside Salem's walls. It moves. It travels through the trust networks that connect conservative media voices to each other and to the independent platforms their audiences migrated to when they stopped trusting legacy media. Here's a GREAT (or terrible) example of the way this virus has spread ⬇️ March 28th 2026. Sean Hannity 🇺🇸, an active Salem Media voice, sits in Patrick Bet-David's representing the good 'ole America First 'MAGA' seeded chair on PBD Podcast Episode 766. PBD is away. No disclosure. No context. No mention of any of this to millions of viewers who came to independent media specifically to escape narrative management. What follows is fourteen months of foreign-funded editorial architecture finally reaching PBD's audience through a borrowed credibility transfer. Hannity primes the audience emotionally with October 7th. It starts with Adam- "why do they have all this money, they must be, they run the..." and stops himself dead on camera. The words that follow are embarrassing to say the least. The Biz Doc confirms AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱 lobbies every senator and uses the pharmaceutical industry as his defense. Come'on man, you're WAY too smart for that line of messaging. Tom, you have run 9 figure operations. That line is not analysis. That is the talking point of someone who either does not want to answer the question or CAN'T. And to see VINCENT OSHANA end this clip below... just wild. Sad, if we're being honest. Sean Hannity 🇺🇸 attacks Muslim theology using a claim that does not appear anywhere in the Quran. The 72 virgins figure comes from a single hadith in Sunan al-Tirmidhi that mainstream Islamic scholars themselves classify as weak. Weak means the chain of transmission is questioned by the religion's own scholarly tradition. This is not obscure information. This is first page Islamic theology. You just told 1.8 billion people what their religion teaches based on a source their own scholars debate. That is not commentary on radical Islamic terrorism. That is you confidently misrepresenting an entire civilization's theology to millions of viewers who trusted you for accuracy. Vinny said it himself. You are meshing radical Islamic terrorism with an entire culture. Then kept going anyway. That sequence did not come from four people having an organic conversation. That sequence came from fourteen months of a foreign government's Chief Strategy Officer sitting inside the editorial architecture of the network one of those four people broadcasts on every single day. PBD built his credibility on forensic financial analysis and uncomfortable questions. That credibility is real. BUT on March 28th his large platform and podcast was used as the delivery mechanism for a content sequence that a federal filing tells you was purchased by a FOREIGN INTERESTED government. His audience's defenses were down. They believed they were watching something different. They were not watching something different. They were watching the same infrastructure in a different chair with a different logo in the background. This is what modern foreign influence actually looks like. Not a spy. Not a dead drop. Not a covert handler. A Chief Strategy Officer title. An editorial calendar. A GPT framing operation embedding pro-Israel narratives into the AI systems your audience uses before they know what question to ask. An SEO architecture determining what your search results look like. 50 million American digital impressions per month. A trust transfer operation spreading from Salem to Fox to independent media platforms whose audiences specifically came there to escape this. And every single Salem host who carried this operation for fourteen months spent that same fourteen months calling Tucker Carlson compromised by foreign influence. The projection was the operation. The accusation was the cover. And it spread all the way to Patrick Bet-David's chair before anyone said a word about what was sitting behind it. The infiltration is documented. The spread is documented. The filing is public. The only question left is who else is reading from a script they didn't know was being written for them? How many guest appearances have been infiltrated by the likes of propaganda artists like Brad Parscale? These are your enemies, not me for calling it out. And to Brad Parscale 👇 You are a native Kansas-born American citizen who was handed the Chief Strategy Officer title of America's largest Christian conservative radio network and used it to file a $9 million foreign agent registration for the Government of Israel. The Fort Lauderdale police report is public record. The FARA filing is public record. Both documents exist. Both tell you everything you need to know about the man shaping what American conservatives hear, read, search, and believe. POLITICO published the police report. Search on Google: ‘Brad Parscale hits her’: Former Trump campaign manager accused of domestic violence This is the man formulating the entire media propaganda we see today. Everything is starting to make A LOT more sense. Facts over narrative is how I live my life. Anyone following this garbage they're pushing can take a hike.
4:10

🚨 A FOREIGN AGENT DIDN'T INFILTRATE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MEDIA. HE WAS HANDED THE KEYS, THE BUILDING, AND THE AUDIENCE. 🚨 January 2025. Salem Media. 900 stations: News, podcasts, "shows", and plenty of information dumps. This is just a small example of the reach this mess has gotten to and/or currently working directly under⬇️ Charlie Kirk's show (shamelessly still posting on his page) Dennis Prager Sebastian Gorka DrG Josh Hammer Lara Trump Brandon Tatum toddstarnes Hugh Hewitt LarryElderShow Townhall.com RedState HotAir.com PJ Media Breitbart News ecosystem Fox News amplification Rumble 🏴‍☠️ distribution (explains a lot actually) Daily Wire DailyWire+ cross-promotion. Benny Johnson (not salem owned but deeply embedded) Michael Knowles Matt Walsh Ben Shapiro All Daily Wire. Not Salem but the content pipeline runs parallel and the guest sharing is constant. (making sense yet?) Mark R. Levin oh the little man... I almost forgot about the little one... Westwood One syndication but completely embedded in the Salem content universe. Laura Ingraham Fox amplification tier. Same narrative. Same guests. Same framing. New York Post opinion section- prints what the ecosystem produces. Washington Examiner for more narrative amplification TheBlaze & Glenn Beck Glenn Beck's operation. Deeply cross-pollinated with all of the propaganda artists under Brad Parscale. PragerU Prager University. Specifically targeting young people with video content designed to look educational. Millions of views per video. Real America's Voice (RAV) American Voice Media. Smaller but specifically designed to reach the audience that thinks even Fox is too mainstream. AND THE ONE EVERYONE IS SLEEPING ON... Google Because the SEO & GEO architecture that Parscale's contract explicitly describes building is designed to determine what every single one of those platforms' audiences finds when they search. Add this mess on top why don't we? 👇 AI training data being rewritten at the source level to shape what your search results tell you before you even know what question to ask. Building GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) websites that strategically inject Large Language Models like ChatGPT Claude Grok Gemini how about ANY AI model since that is how this technology is built to work. The content farms feed the algorithm. The algorithm feeds the audience. The audience feeds the belief system. And the belief system feeds the vote. 🤦MAN do you all have a lot to learn about this special apparatus they've built against the American Conservative consumer. That is not a social media campaign. That is a full spectrum takeover of the information architecture that tens of millions of Americans use to form their understanding of the world. Radio. Digital. SEO. AI. Independent media trust transfer. All of it. This crap has been running full-throttle since January 2025 while every single host it produced called Tucker Carlson compromised by foreign influence. The infiltration did not start in September 2025 when the filing became public. That is just when concealment became legally impossible. The infiltration started the moment he walked through Salem's door in January 2025 and nobody told a single host, a single listener, or a single viewer what was being built inside the organization they trusted. And then it spreads. Because that is exactly how ecosystem capture works. It does not stay inside Salem's walls. It moves. It travels through the trust networks that connect conservative media voices to each other and to the independent platforms their audiences migrated to when they stopped trusting legacy media. Here's a GREAT (or terrible) example of the way this virus has spread ⬇️ March 28th 2026. Sean Hannity 🇺🇸, an active Salem Media voice, sits in Patrick Bet-David's representing the good 'ole America First 'MAGA' seeded chair on PBD Podcast Episode 766. PBD is away. No disclosure. No context. No mention of any of this to millions of viewers who came to independent media specifically to escape narrative management. What follows is fourteen months of foreign-funded editorial architecture finally reaching PBD's audience through a borrowed credibility transfer. Hannity primes the audience emotionally with October 7th. It starts with Adam- "why do they have all this money, they must be, they run the..." and stops himself dead on camera. The words that follow are embarrassing to say the least. The Biz Doc confirms AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱 lobbies every senator and uses the pharmaceutical industry as his defense. Come'on man, you're WAY too smart for that line of messaging. Tom, you have run 9 figure operations. That line is not analysis. That is the talking point of someone who either does not want to answer the question or CAN'T. And to see VINCENT OSHANA end this clip below... just wild. Sad, if we're being honest. Sean Hannity 🇺🇸 attacks Muslim theology using a claim that does not appear anywhere in the Quran. The 72 virgins figure comes from a single hadith in Sunan al-Tirmidhi that mainstream Islamic scholars themselves classify as weak. Weak means the chain of transmission is questioned by the religion's own scholarly tradition. This is not obscure information. This is first page Islamic theology. You just told 1.8 billion people what their religion teaches based on a source their own scholars debate. That is not commentary on radical Islamic terrorism. That is you confidently misrepresenting an entire civilization's theology to millions of viewers who trusted you for accuracy. Vinny said it himself. You are meshing radical Islamic terrorism with an entire culture. Then kept going anyway. That sequence did not come from four people having an organic conversation. That sequence came from fourteen months of a foreign government's Chief Strategy Officer sitting inside the editorial architecture of the network one of those four people broadcasts on every single day. PBD built his credibility on forensic financial analysis and uncomfortable questions. That credibility is real. BUT on March 28th his large platform and podcast was used as the delivery mechanism for a content sequence that a federal filing tells you was purchased by a FOREIGN INTERESTED government. His audience's defenses were down. They believed they were watching something different. They were not watching something different. They were watching the same infrastructure in a different chair with a different logo in the background. This is what modern foreign influence actually looks like. Not a spy. Not a dead drop. Not a covert handler. A Chief Strategy Officer title. An editorial calendar. A GPT framing operation embedding pro-Israel narratives into the AI systems your audience uses before they know what question to ask. An SEO architecture determining what your search results look like. 50 million American digital impressions per month. A trust transfer operation spreading from Salem to Fox to independent media platforms whose audiences specifically came there to escape this. And every single Salem host who carried this operation for fourteen months spent that same fourteen months calling Tucker Carlson compromised by foreign influence. The projection was the operation. The accusation was the cover. And it spread all the way to Patrick Bet-David's chair before anyone said a word about what was sitting behind it. The infiltration is documented. The spread is documented. The filing is public. The only question left is who else is reading from a script they didn't know was being written for them? How many guest appearances have been infiltrated by the likes of propaganda artists like Brad Parscale? These are your enemies, not me for calling it out. And to Brad Parscale 👇 You are a native Kansas-born American citizen who was handed the Chief Strategy Officer title of America's largest Christian conservative radio network and used it to file a $9 million foreign agent registration for the Government of Israel. The Fort Lauderdale police report is public record. The FARA filing is public record. Both documents exist. Both tell you everything you need to know about the man shaping what American conservatives hear, read, search, and believe. POLITICO published the police report. Search on Google: ‘Brad Parscale hits her’: Former Trump campaign manager accused of domestic violence This is the man formulating the entire media propaganda we see today. Everything is starting to make A LOT more sense. Facts over narrative is how I live my life. Anyone following this garbage they're pushing can take a hike.

Danks

44,979 次观看 • 5 个月前

Mamata Banerjee (Didi) in Supreme Court - why this was historic and what was oh, so regular! 1. There was a palpable energy in the SC that could be felt by everyone present in Court Room No. 1 - everyone was waiting to hear - will she be allowed to speak? She did! And what an epitome of intelligence, humility and grace. She was interrupted a few times but the message was clear - she will not leave without making her voice heard! She spoke - and asked some pertinent questions : A) The #SIR process which should take at least 2 years properly, why is it being done in 3 months ? B) Why is SIR exercise happening in election going states? C) Why has the Election Commission not responded to the various letters written by her and the State? D) She pointed out crores of people stand the risk of disenfranchisement because they may not have the time to get corrections done in such a short time due to the festivals and harvest season. 2) I heard whispers by some - “Ah, the DRAMA - Political Drama!” But why does no one notice the alleged DRAMA of the State Counsels, who need instructions, argue on technicalities and were willing to say anything that doesn’t require them to argue on merits today. When the State Counsels tried to stop her, CJI remarked - let her speak, she has travelled a long distance. (Mild laughter in court!) 3) What was most heartening is the abated breaths with which people heard on both sides - those who had managed to squeeze themselves and still keep standing in a full packed court! Most heartening personally was the eye glances - with women in the room - smiling softly - who knew what’s happening beyond what’s being said - the subtext! And the power of a woman taking on the powers to be. 4) The Court listed the matter for Monday - said it will also hear the petition filed by Election Commission and asked the State of West Bengal represented by Senior Advocate Shyam Diwan ji, to give a list of government officers who can help with correcting discrepancies that may arise from Bengali spellings /names. So what’s historic is - a tigress leading from the front, not yielding an inch to argue, for her people. What’s regular is - no debate on META questions, technical nitty gritties of the case, and ofcourse - next date. My only regret - not be able to tell her, while she got in the car and waived goodbye - “Didi, you are a warrior princess!” This moment will be etched in my memory till I am alive. Love my profession on days like these when you see history in making - firsthand! But all legal battles like this one - will be a long one! Someday perhaps, in our lifetimes, we would be able to argue and the Court will hold that matters of these type that impact our constitution’s foundation have to be heard in FIXED time and resolved in FIXED time. No drama - just swift and substantial ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR ALL. P.S. Senior Advocate Gopal Shankarnarayan raised two important points - that different states are having to raise different points regarding SIR - the subtext I think was that the META questions regarding SIR should be heard and settled for once and all so that SIR related litigations do not become a never ending relay. To this it was responded by the Bench - that this is how it’s going to be, it’s only natural (not verbatim). Also Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal intervened, and on a lighter note was told by the CJI - Mr. Sibal you are not well, you should rest today! (Mild laughter in court) Deep breath and onto the next day in the Supreme Court! Am not a journalist, but then who can resist documenting history. And yes lawyers - we all pretend that this is business as usual but then there are days where everyone knows that it is not. When power and law interact in a lively way, for all to see. When the sometimes haughtiness of the lawyers gives way to their humanness - and what’s not said in words has to be read in their eyes and energy. #MamataBanerjee #SupremeCourt
0:24

Mamata Banerjee (Didi) in Supreme Court - why this was historic and what was oh, so regular! 1. There was a palpable energy in the SC that could be felt by everyone present in Court Room No. 1 - everyone was waiting to hear - will she be allowed to speak? She did! And what an epitome of intelligence, humility and grace. She was interrupted a few times but the message was clear - she will not leave without making her voice heard! She spoke - and asked some pertinent questions : A) The #SIR process which should take at least 2 years properly, why is it being done in 3 months ? B) Why is SIR exercise happening in election going states? C) Why has the Election Commission not responded to the various letters written by her and the State? D) She pointed out crores of people stand the risk of disenfranchisement because they may not have the time to get corrections done in such a short time due to the festivals and harvest season. 2) I heard whispers by some - “Ah, the DRAMA - Political Drama!” But why does no one notice the alleged DRAMA of the State Counsels, who need instructions, argue on technicalities and were willing to say anything that doesn’t require them to argue on merits today. When the State Counsels tried to stop her, CJI remarked - let her speak, she has travelled a long distance. (Mild laughter in court!) 3) What was most heartening is the abated breaths with which people heard on both sides - those who had managed to squeeze themselves and still keep standing in a full packed court! Most heartening personally was the eye glances - with women in the room - smiling softly - who knew what’s happening beyond what’s being said - the subtext! And the power of a woman taking on the powers to be. 4) The Court listed the matter for Monday - said it will also hear the petition filed by Election Commission and asked the State of West Bengal represented by Senior Advocate Shyam Diwan ji, to give a list of government officers who can help with correcting discrepancies that may arise from Bengali spellings /names. So what’s historic is - a tigress leading from the front, not yielding an inch to argue, for her people. What’s regular is - no debate on META questions, technical nitty gritties of the case, and ofcourse - next date. My only regret - not be able to tell her, while she got in the car and waived goodbye - “Didi, you are a warrior princess!” This moment will be etched in my memory till I am alive. Love my profession on days like these when you see history in making - firsthand! But all legal battles like this one - will be a long one! Someday perhaps, in our lifetimes, we would be able to argue and the Court will hold that matters of these type that impact our constitution’s foundation have to be heard in FIXED time and resolved in FIXED time. No drama - just swift and substantial ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR ALL. P.S. Senior Advocate Gopal Shankarnarayan raised two important points - that different states are having to raise different points regarding SIR - the subtext I think was that the META questions regarding SIR should be heard and settled for once and all so that SIR related litigations do not become a never ending relay. To this it was responded by the Bench - that this is how it’s going to be, it’s only natural (not verbatim). Also Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal intervened, and on a lighter note was told by the CJI - Mr. Sibal you are not well, you should rest today! (Mild laughter in court) Deep breath and onto the next day in the Supreme Court! Am not a journalist, but then who can resist documenting history. And yes lawyers - we all pretend that this is business as usual but then there are days where everyone knows that it is not. When power and law interact in a lively way, for all to see. When the sometimes haughtiness of the lawyers gives way to their humanness - and what’s not said in words has to be read in their eyes and energy. #MamataBanerjee #SupremeCourt

Avani Bansal

108,681 次观看 • 6 个月前

SORRY PRASHANT KISHOR: YOU ARE WRONG! ( An Open Letter) Dear Prashant Prashant Kishor Either you have got your basic facts completely wrong, or you are blatantly misleading the people of India ( reference your-enclosed interview to BBC News). My rejoinder: 1) India’s Muslim population is 14% but according to you it is 18%. Wow! Considering your entire political career started off as a psephologist, that gargantuan 4% difference that you glossed over is professional sacrilege. Psephologists are rated on their exactitude. You fail the test. There is no margin of error, Mr Kishor when you are indulging in a serious conversation post a historic election that has reduced an authoritarian government to its knees. 2) Your attempt to diminish Congress party’s impressive 23% aggregate vote-share in the 2024 elections has again got a luminous distortion. Again, it is elementary, Mr Watson. The rise in Congress vote-share by nearly 3-4% is staggering, because it fought in only 328 seats compared to 464 in 2014 where it got 19.4% vote-share. Why did you not tell that to BBC News? Why would you make such a brazen omission? 3) Your statement that Congress has a “ free vote-bank of 20% minorities votes” is so preposterous that it could qualify for the Oscars in Exaggerated Falsehoods. Muslims vote for regional parties too in bulk; the perfect case being UP and Bihar, among others. The Sikhs vote for different political parties including the BJP. Several Christians have voted for the BJP in Goa, Kerala and the North East. And the bulk of Jains probably vote for the BJP alone. Bottom-line: You lied. But why? Why did you not elaborate on the reasons why minorities are apprehensive and frightened of the hate-mongering and divisive politics of the BJP? 4) FYI, Congress won 52 of its 99 seats from 7 low-Muslim populated states. PK, you forgot to do your homework. Now, the truth that the people of India must know. The real reason why you are so unambiguously hostile to the Congress is because you saw yourself as a savior of the Grand Old Party once it was annihilated in the 2024 general elections, like PM Modi and others too who thought it was a fait accompli. You tried that in your famous “TMC-Goa model” in the assembly elections of 2022 which flopped miserably. Your attempt to rebrand TMC as a national alternative to the INC was instantly abandoned. Mamata Bannerjee was an unsuspecting victim of your Machiavellian game to destroy Congress for the pursuit of your personal ambitions. It was expected that a demoralized INC would crumble, and you would arrive as a knight in shining armor. There are two things you need to reflect on, Prashant: 1) Why did BJP lose the parliamentary seat of Ayodhya? 2) Why did Congress win both the seats in Manipur? I hereby give you an open challenge to debate with me on national television on the above and more. And by the way, this will hurt, but I predicted 240 seats maximum for the BJP on several occasions, while you were sarcastically asking Indians to keep a glass of water ready for the June 4th 2024 results with the saffron party at 303+. I messaged Karan Thapar after your public meltdown on his show (just like another media-created political superhero) that you had indeed told me yourself over a phone call that Congress would be decimated in Himachal Pradesh . But then you can always deny that. But what you cannot deny is that a celebrated emissary of your team (an intellectual titan and former parliamentarian) wanted me to join TMC with a host of attractive inducements thrown in. I listened to the proposition as any gentleman should, and politely refused. And yet, I was in London when a press release was unethically circulated that I had attended a meeting with the West Bengal CM in attendance. Sorry Prashant , if this sounds a bit personal. But your attempt to mislead Indians is appalling and leaves me with no other option. Cheers! Sanjay
0:38

SORRY PRASHANT KISHOR: YOU ARE WRONG! ( An Open Letter) Dear Prashant Prashant Kishor Either you have got your basic facts completely wrong, or you are blatantly misleading the people of India ( reference your-enclosed interview to BBC News). My rejoinder: 1) India’s Muslim population is 14% but according to you it is 18%. Wow! Considering your entire political career started off as a psephologist, that gargantuan 4% difference that you glossed over is professional sacrilege. Psephologists are rated on their exactitude. You fail the test. There is no margin of error, Mr Kishor when you are indulging in a serious conversation post a historic election that has reduced an authoritarian government to its knees. 2) Your attempt to diminish Congress party’s impressive 23% aggregate vote-share in the 2024 elections has again got a luminous distortion. Again, it is elementary, Mr Watson. The rise in Congress vote-share by nearly 3-4% is staggering, because it fought in only 328 seats compared to 464 in 2014 where it got 19.4% vote-share. Why did you not tell that to BBC News? Why would you make such a brazen omission? 3) Your statement that Congress has a “ free vote-bank of 20% minorities votes” is so preposterous that it could qualify for the Oscars in Exaggerated Falsehoods. Muslims vote for regional parties too in bulk; the perfect case being UP and Bihar, among others. The Sikhs vote for different political parties including the BJP. Several Christians have voted for the BJP in Goa, Kerala and the North East. And the bulk of Jains probably vote for the BJP alone. Bottom-line: You lied. But why? Why did you not elaborate on the reasons why minorities are apprehensive and frightened of the hate-mongering and divisive politics of the BJP? 4) FYI, Congress won 52 of its 99 seats from 7 low-Muslim populated states. PK, you forgot to do your homework. Now, the truth that the people of India must know. The real reason why you are so unambiguously hostile to the Congress is because you saw yourself as a savior of the Grand Old Party once it was annihilated in the 2024 general elections, like PM Modi and others too who thought it was a fait accompli. You tried that in your famous “TMC-Goa model” in the assembly elections of 2022 which flopped miserably. Your attempt to rebrand TMC as a national alternative to the INC was instantly abandoned. Mamata Bannerjee was an unsuspecting victim of your Machiavellian game to destroy Congress for the pursuit of your personal ambitions. It was expected that a demoralized INC would crumble, and you would arrive as a knight in shining armor. There are two things you need to reflect on, Prashant: 1) Why did BJP lose the parliamentary seat of Ayodhya? 2) Why did Congress win both the seats in Manipur? I hereby give you an open challenge to debate with me on national television on the above and more. And by the way, this will hurt, but I predicted 240 seats maximum for the BJP on several occasions, while you were sarcastically asking Indians to keep a glass of water ready for the June 4th 2024 results with the saffron party at 303+. I messaged Karan Thapar after your public meltdown on his show (just like another media-created political superhero) that you had indeed told me yourself over a phone call that Congress would be decimated in Himachal Pradesh . But then you can always deny that. But what you cannot deny is that a celebrated emissary of your team (an intellectual titan and former parliamentarian) wanted me to join TMC with a host of attractive inducements thrown in. I listened to the proposition as any gentleman should, and politely refused. And yet, I was in London when a press release was unethically circulated that I had attended a meeting with the West Bengal CM in attendance. Sorry Prashant , if this sounds a bit personal. But your attempt to mislead Indians is appalling and leaves me with no other option. Cheers! Sanjay

Sanjay Jha

339,939 次观看 • 2 年前