Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“This was not hearsay, this was not speculation, this was a declaration from the man [Duterte] himself. Under oath, he admitted.” — Cong. Benny Abante Salute to the whole team of House Quad Committee. 🫡🫡🫡 House of Representatives of the Philippines Justice for all the victims! ⚖️Int'l Criminal Court

29,187 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Ann's profile picture
Ann1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt 👏👏👏👏Ganyan dapat senate di yong mga aso kayo..😂😂😂😂SAlute quadcom

patriot's profile picture
patriot1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Puro tsismis ang evidence?🤣

Moncito Diocampo's profile picture
Moncito Diocampo1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Hulihin na yan,at matapos na Ang agam agam,at matuldukan na,inamin under other na mga,at pag katapos e twist na joke lang,wag papalinlang,Ang evildoers must pay.

out-of-box thinker's profile picture
out-of-box thinker1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Only information with consequence matter. Without result, that could just be a dog show.

🌧A New Clear Day🌅's profile picture
🌧A New Clear Day🌅1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Represent-the-Thieves afraid of their own shadow 👻

Abelsky's profile picture
Abelsky1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Duterte and his Davao death squad acting in Conspiracy with Police officers and other Vigilantes should be prosecuted for their crimes againsts humanity

topaz citrine's profile picture
topaz citrine1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt ay punyetang gaslighting yan. Ikaw unang gumawa niyan. hinayupak ka.

Derek Soil's profile picture
Derek Soil1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Putanginamoka Abante

Miguel Salcedo's profile picture
Miguel Salcedo1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt HYPERBOLE AND OUT OF CONTEXT INADMISSIBLE IN COURT TRY HARDER ABANTE

Ethan's profile picture
Ethan1 year ago

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt mga ungas!

Related Videos

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?

Just

36,083 views • 1 year ago