正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

“This was not hearsay, this was not speculation, this was a declaration from the man [Duterte] himself. Under oath, he admitted.” — Cong. Benny Abante Salute to the whole team of House Quad Committee. 🫡🫡🫡 House of Representatives of the Philippines Justice for all the victims! ⚖️Int'l Criminal Court

29,187 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Ann 的头像
Ann1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt 👏👏👏👏Ganyan dapat senate di yong mga aso kayo..😂😂😂😂SAlute quadcom

patriot 的头像
patriot1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Puro tsismis ang evidence?🤣

Moncito Diocampo 的头像
Moncito Diocampo1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Hulihin na yan,at matapos na Ang agam agam,at matuldukan na,inamin under other na mga,at pag katapos e twist na joke lang,wag papalinlang,Ang evildoers must pay.

out-of-box thinker 的头像
out-of-box thinker1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Only information with consequence matter. Without result, that could just be a dog show.

🌧A New Clear Day🌅 的头像
🌧A New Clear Day🌅1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Represent-the-Thieves afraid of their own shadow 👻

Abelsky 的头像
Abelsky1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Duterte and his Davao death squad acting in Conspiracy with Police officers and other Vigilantes should be prosecuted for their crimes againsts humanity

topaz citrine 的头像
topaz citrine1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt ay punyetang gaslighting yan. Ikaw unang gumawa niyan. hinayupak ka.

Derek Soil 的头像
Derek Soil1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt Putanginamoka Abante

Miguel Salcedo 的头像
Miguel Salcedo1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt HYPERBOLE AND OUT OF CONTEXT INADMISSIBLE IN COURT TRY HARDER ABANTE

Ethan 的头像
Ethan1 年前

@HouseofRepsPH @IntlCrimCourt mga ungas!

相关视频

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?

Just

36,043 次观看 • 11 个月前