This was only reported on September 12, 2001 and never again.

:- |

What about remnants of the planes? Wings, fuselage, nuts, bolts, seats, luggage, body parts, jewelry, etc., etc., etc.

Every building ends up like that gets hit by bombs

Suggested reading @DunningKrugerxp Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article:

It disintegrated from a controlled demolition of pre-wires nanothermite

Here is some suggested reading @TimKania A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment What did we SEE or what were we told TO SEE on 9/11, on repeat for the last 23+ years. Article: Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: Was every BOOM on 9/11 a bomb? Not everything that goes boom is a bomb. Article:

Thx 911 🙌🏽

It’s almost like the buildings are mostly air. You know, like a whole bunch of office space. This was only reported once because someone clearly realized what a stupid fuking question it is. Absolute dimwittery from you conspiracy tards.

Only dimwittery I see, is you @VinBarbarino

So what is your theory on where it all went?

See, @VinBarbarino I doubt you could handle the truth. Here goes nothing, with sharing this clip. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no. The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence. The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence. The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves. Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow:

Give me the cliffs notes version.

It's a 7 minute video @VinBarbarino, you struggle staying focussed for longer than 2 minutes? Have you got Tik Tok brain?

You’re not very good at this.

And unfortunately like most @VinBarbarino, you're not interested in learning something new. Pity how lazy certain people are, whilst stating they're truth seekers, yet want to do no work.

Some food for thought @Herr_Bowen 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article:

The towers were never real. Skylines aren’t real, they’re just holograms projected by the lizards that control the fake money to make us feel like we’ve accomplished something. - it’s all a hoax.

O, dear...

This is the dumbest conspiracy. What are you trying to imply? They have magical vaporizatikn technology that they used here for no useful reason at all? The etc had a 77ft underground portion. Each floor slab on the wtc was only 10cm of reinforced concrete. Also some trusses

Seems you don't really understand what was used in the construction of the Twin Towers @Driftwood_77 Remember all that steel? You should read the following. A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment What did we SEE or what were we told TO SEE on 9/11, on repeat for the last 23+ years. Article: Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article:

I do believe it was a controlled demolition. That has nothing to do with your initial point of debris disappearing. If your point was not "the debris disappeared", then you are a very poor communicator. Whether the collapse was controlled or natural, no difference in debris amt

Reading is learning @Driftwood_77. You should try it. A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment What did we SEE or what were we told TO SEE on 9/11, on repeat for the last 23+ years. Article: Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article:

Stephanopoulos got a nice career out of keeping mum about it.

Let's expose the media complicity in the 9/11 cover-up @gogreen1908

There was an entire underground mall and levels of parking lots & subway stations for the rubble to fall down into.

You've been fooled @Tuffie9lives I suggest you read my articles. The mostly EMPTY basements of the Twin Towers. Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble. Article: Revisiting the basements of the WTC. Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble. Article:

All I know for certain is that some of that sh!t went into my lungs.

Because follow-up coverage and investigations showed the full scope of debris.

Did they @Punkgi? Show me where...

@Punkgi All these scrap yard videos are Hollywood. Nothing but DUST was sold to China. Get some popcorn-- and see mountains of steel wreckage.

Let's grab the calculator @911_justice A “Lengthy” Discussion of WTC Steel As an attempt to numerically illustrate the level of destruction, an overall figure of the total length of steel, which should have been present in the debris pile, is here calculated. Link: How much steel was expected? Seeing that you won't read the article. Well - if each column of steel was put end to end - It would have stretched a line 550 MILES long, yet, no such amount of steel was recovered. Also note: The NIST Steel Inventory and Investigation report states that only 0.25 to 0.5 percent of the 200,000 tons of steel used in the construction of the towers had been recovered. Link:

@Punkgi Your figures are dead wrong. "Shortly after the attacks, New York City sold 175,000 tons of World Trade Center steel scrap..."

Find me the weigh bills for all the rubble transported from the site, @911_justice Also, are YOU blind? You know what @911_justice - You've been trolling my comments now for three years. Let's see if you're solid enough in your convictions to come have an evidence based discussion on my podcast - You game? Or you going to run, like a coward?

@Punkgi Get Matt Nelson, the expert on 9/11 Debris.

@Punkgi Are you refusing my evidence based discussion @911_justice?

So, 175,000 tons of WTC steel supposedly went to China, India, South Korea, Malaysia, and Japan — yet there’s not a single photo or video anywhere of it being loaded or unloaded from cargo ships whatsoever. This was obviously a well coordinated lie by the media.

Here is a better angle @sajolly908

Ben and Jerry's got some explaining to do

Answer: Thermite

Unfortunately you've been lied to @Mad_Americans Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article:

Nah dude. You just believe the lies they’ve sold you.

Here is my take on James Corbett @Mad_Americans The Corbett Report & Secret Weapons Technology The meaning of 9/11 Truth and evidence that shall not be discussed Article:

Man our TVs were way better than that

@grok is there a lot of white phosphorus around Israel? And can you give a brief simple description of how it burns.

Total coverup. Israel did this to get us in war. Cheney was architect.

It's a bit more layered @sean78648607 Read the article, after listening to the clip. 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article:

Sn employer of mine threw away her book unread. I read, so rescued the book, I learned a lot

So, is the theory that skyscrapers are like trees in golf? They are 90% air?

Nope - You forget what was in the buildings @RV_In_Yard

@TomatoBubble Dust = Implosion aftermath.

CV-19 taught us that even people with PhD's are "educated" retards @Rasterblath and reading is learning. Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article:

dew davy crockett's demolition

Has anyone looked into whether asbestos (known to be throughout the structure) is able to be used as a catalyst? The massive evaporation of major portions of the structure is a mystery. Just asking...

You'll get a better idea when investigating the dust, as @quantumheat is currently doing @SenorSeeker He will be publishing his results of the study soon. 9/11's Hidden Physics: Exotic Tech or Controlled Demolition? LENR researcher Bob Greenyer reveals microspheres, plasmoids & material anomalies that challenge everything we thought we knew Discussion:

U hear bout people dying in the towers, on the ground, n first responders. But u never hear someone say a family member died while flying in the plane that hit the pentagon.

ABC.

Who, What, Zelensky, what a coincidence.

the reason we are held hostage by ISRAEL is they have 1000s of buildings wired-millions of devices triggered and the samson option one itchy finger away from worldwide obliteration making 9/11 look like a snap pop

I distinctly remember Tom Brokaw dying not long after this aired ...but I just looked him up and he is 86 yrs old A Mandele Effect?

Nothing but DUST!!! Peter, you gotta get down here and see the steady line of trucks filled with dust passing by my location. I haven't seen one piece of steel in hours.

The dust was ankle deep in places @911_justice Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article:

Pulverized by the goybeam.

No beams were needed @grey_alien0 Let's explain...

@grey_alien0 Where can we find the full video?

@grey_alien0 You'll be able to find it on Richard D. Hall's website @thespeedofligh5

@grok what is your best guess as to where the actual rubble went?

Did you ever read the work by the Russian ex nuclear specialist? His explanation seems to make some sense. He said the towers weren’t permitted to be constructed without a demo plan, and in this case it was underground nuclear munitions.

The nuke angle is absolute drivel @PLKisGOD The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower Firefighters Raul Angulo and Erik Lawyer explained the holes in the narrative on Redacted, yet they are withholding important evidence about their fellow firefighters. Article:

@PLKisGOD “Drivel” 😂

Yes, @ericpbutz - The 9/11 nuke angle is drivel. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no. The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence. The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence. The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves. Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow:

@PLKisGOD I was implying the whole topic and original post of missing debris was “drivel”

@PLKisGOD O, @ericpbutz - The lack of debris is a provable fact once you open your eyes and look.

😮