Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This was somebody’s son once 😳 Now it’s a red-fishnet wearing #sissy #bitch getting her guts rearranged by her New Daddy’s Big Black Cock ♠️🍆💦 #BNWO #sissy #BBC #toes #feet #missionary #gape #deepanal #fag #femboy #tranny #domtop #humiliated

XxGooned_OutxX2's profile picture

Gooned Out

3,784 subscribers

11,856 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#sissy#bitch#BNWO#sissy#BBC#toes#feet#missionary#gape#deepanal#fag#femboy#tranny#domtop#humiliated
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Houston Black business owner Kashelle Kelly shared her ratings and commentary on the ridiculous reviews about #MamaTinasGumbo at RODEOHOUSTON. She offers her experienced expertise on commercial food selling and preparation. She also addresses how it’s often your own people coming online with hateful comments for clicks and views. SN: I found it ridiculous that Black people came online lying—especially you weird stan Barbs of Nicki Minaj, Tory Lanez, and Drake. A lot of y’all have mental issues and hateful spirits. There were idiots not from Texas, the South, or familiar with Houston Rodeo culture/lifestyle spreading online lies. I also saw over-the-top New Orleans/Louisiana complaints about the gumbo, full of known lies. Everyone in New Orleans or Louisiana doesn’t make roux the same—some like it dark, light brown, or brown; some even like it dark black. Some prefer thick, medium-thick, or thin roux. I’ve seen people in Louisiana and New Orleans put oysters, lobster, turkey necks, boiled eggs, or chicken feet in gumbo, so the audacity y’all had regarding this gumbo was wild. Ms. Tina literally said it was a hybrid gumbo, and they (her two partners) were testing it at the Rodeo. May I add, the two guys are related to Daniel Smith—Solange’s ex-husband and father to Julez—which I stated last year before anyone else knew. They’re from Louisiana/Texas too, so comparing it to “Louisiana gumbo” when even folks there don’t all do it the same is asinine. The complaints about having crab shells or shrimp shells in the gumbo are normal—that’s how I knew y’all were fabricating lies. It just shows a lot of the reviews were fabricated lies and exaggerations. But if it was a white establishment, y’all wouldn’t dare say it online the way y’all attacked a Black person. I mean, y’all are on Elon’s app right now, and he posts racist stuff about Black people every day, yet I don’t see one Black person besides me calling him out. McDonald’s ice cream machine is always out, but y’all still go… right?? Y’all still shop at Target… right?? Bottom line: y’all did way too much because you’re evil and hateful. You could’ve critiqued better if the reviews were genuine. Whatever love y’all didn’t get inside y’all home, Ms.Tina or her partner Adrian had nothing to do with that. Do better. #rodeohouston #GUMBOGATE #opionionatedtruthspodcast 💎🍾 Akiresatmidnight The OG BEŸ-Z solange knowles Roc Nation Big Mama, your ARM! yvette nicole brown Julez XXL Magazine Red Media Complex FOX26Houston
9:57

Houston Black business owner Kashelle Kelly shared her ratings and commentary on the ridiculous reviews about #MamaTinasGumbo at RODEOHOUSTON. She offers her experienced expertise on commercial food selling and preparation. She also addresses how it’s often your own people coming online with hateful comments for clicks and views. SN: I found it ridiculous that Black people came online lying—especially you weird stan Barbs of Nicki Minaj, Tory Lanez, and Drake. A lot of y’all have mental issues and hateful spirits. There were idiots not from Texas, the South, or familiar with Houston Rodeo culture/lifestyle spreading online lies. I also saw over-the-top New Orleans/Louisiana complaints about the gumbo, full of known lies. Everyone in New Orleans or Louisiana doesn’t make roux the same—some like it dark, light brown, or brown; some even like it dark black. Some prefer thick, medium-thick, or thin roux. I’ve seen people in Louisiana and New Orleans put oysters, lobster, turkey necks, boiled eggs, or chicken feet in gumbo, so the audacity y’all had regarding this gumbo was wild. Ms. Tina literally said it was a hybrid gumbo, and they (her two partners) were testing it at the Rodeo. May I add, the two guys are related to Daniel Smith—Solange’s ex-husband and father to Julez—which I stated last year before anyone else knew. They’re from Louisiana/Texas too, so comparing it to “Louisiana gumbo” when even folks there don’t all do it the same is asinine. The complaints about having crab shells or shrimp shells in the gumbo are normal—that’s how I knew y’all were fabricating lies. It just shows a lot of the reviews were fabricated lies and exaggerations. But if it was a white establishment, y’all wouldn’t dare say it online the way y’all attacked a Black person. I mean, y’all are on Elon’s app right now, and he posts racist stuff about Black people every day, yet I don’t see one Black person besides me calling him out. McDonald’s ice cream machine is always out, but y’all still go… right?? Y’all still shop at Target… right?? Bottom line: y’all did way too much because you’re evil and hateful. You could’ve critiqued better if the reviews were genuine. Whatever love y’all didn’t get inside y’all home, Ms.Tina or her partner Adrian had nothing to do with that. Do better. #rodeohouston #GUMBOGATE #opionionatedtruthspodcast 💎🍾 Akiresatmidnight The OG BEŸ-Z solange knowles Roc Nation Big Mama, your ARM! yvette nicole brown Julez XXL Magazine Red Media Complex FOX26Houston

OPINIONATED_TRUTHS_PODCAST™️

41,711 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A Sickening Portrait of Abuse: What Traci Kornak Allegedly Did to an Old Vulnerable Woman New documents reveal a former Dem bigwig took away toilet paper, lightbulbs and Christmas cards, all while draining Rose Burd’s bank account By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Traci Kornak grew angry when she found out the authorities were on to her. And she punished the old woman for it. She isolated her. She didn’t even tell the old woman that her family members had died. The old woman liked to sit with the lights on. So, Kornak, her court-appointed conservator, removed the lightbulbs and the night light. She instructed that her room be kept cold. Kornak—against the wishes of the old woman—installed cameras in her quarters so she could monitor the comings and goings of investigators. Kornak, who was recently the Michigan Democrat Party Treasurer, attempted to secretly record a confidential conversation between the old woman, Rose Burd, and a social worker who chronicled the abuse for two laborious years, trying to build a case against the politically powerful lawyer and orchestrate her removal from the woman’s life. Investigators’ reports and forensic accounting documents obtained by Michigan Enjoyer paint a sickening portrait of abuse and betrayal of Rose Burd, who died last year at age 87. They also show that the authorities charged with protecting the vulnerable and elderly woman dithered. Kornak would buy items like bulk toilet paper with the old woman’s money, but only give her a sleeve of it. Kornak swapped Christmas cards sent by family members with unsigned replacements. She verbally abused the old woman: “So you’re going to be a f***ing bitch today. Great.” It is now alleged that Kornak looted Burd’s estate while she was the Democrat treasurer. That she used the old woman’s debit card for expensive clothes and liquor and food for herself. And when the old woman died last year, Traci Kornak incinerated her body even though Rose had asked for a Catholic burial. Cremation, after all, is cheaper than a casket. Kornak lived the high life. “Essentially Ms. Kornak, you were making a significant living off Ms. Burd,” said Allegan County Chief Probate Judge Jolene Clearwater. Kornak had come to court in an extravagant fuchsia overcoat. Observers in the gallery wondered how it was paid for. Black would have been more appropriate. Black is funereal. And Kornak’s career, reputation, and freedom are on life support. After a three-year investigation, Kent County Prosecutor Chris Becker last week leveled three felony charges against Kornak: two counts of embezzlement from a vulnerable adult, and one charge of false pretenses. Combined, they carry a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison and restitution. Kornak’s friends seemingly have abandoned her. Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, whom Kornak often bragged about being a happy-hour buddy, has said nothing in her defense. Attorney General Dana Nessel, too, has a personal and well-documented relationship with Kornak, having hired her as a transition team member in 2018 when she was elected Attorney General. Kornak—until last year—was one of the most powerful Democrats in Michigan, tasked with handling tens of millions of dollars of the party’s cash. Now Kornak is a pariah. Looking at Burd’s case file compiled by investigators at the Kent County Sheriff’s Office and the state’s Adult Protective Services, it seems all of it could have been stopped, and should have been stopped, well before Burd’s death. Six enforcement agencies watched in real-time. The Kent County Sheriff’s Department. Adult Protective Services. The County Prosecutor. The Attorney General’s Office. The Michigan State Police. The Attorney Grievance Commission. Governor Whitmer was fully aware. But Kornak was powerful. She was among the untouchables. Cross Kornak, and you could find yourself on the unemployment line. In one log, Stephen Conrad, the APS worker assigned to Rose Burd, memorialized a call he had with Amanda Van Essen Wirth, a special assistant attorney general attached to Nessel’s office. “The case was reviewed with Amanda,” he wrote in February 2025. “She reported that because of the sensitivity of the case and the connection that Ms. Kornak has with government officials and the mystery surrounding the last people to blow the whistle on Ms. Kornak that it was best to wait… With what is being reported Amanda did not feel comfortable with the filing in Probate.” Rose Burd died six weeks later. In the end, Kornak will face a jury, but there is Nessel’s culpability too. In her capacity as attorney general, Nessel had the original case against Kornak. Her office conducted an investigation that appears to be little more than sock-puppet theater. I was contacted four years ago by Joe LeBlanc, director of the assisted living center where Burd lived, Heather Hills. Burd’s room, board and medical needs were paid by an insurance company after her catastrophic car wreck more than a decade ago. LeBlanc accused Kornak of concocting an ornate scheme to bilk the insurance company of an addition $50,000 for care provided to Burd by Kornak’s daughter, care that does not appear to have ever been given. I wrote the original story in July 2022. Nessel had no choice but to open an investigation. Curiously, Kornak called Nessel’s chief investigator—unprompted—according to AG documents obtained through a public records request. Kornak told Nessel’s investigator that she was indeed withdrawing $50,000 from Burd’s accounts to pay her daughter, but was planning to replenish those funds once the insurance company sent the check. But the insurance company had already sent the check six months earlier, and that check was returned by Heather Hills. Nobody in Nessel’s office, it seems, noticed the obvious inconsistency. Or they simply ignored it. Now with Kornak charged in Kent County, Nessel is attempting to cover her tracks since she is the subject of an impeachment investigation by the House Oversight Committee. “The Attorney General’s office is either one of two things,” said Committee Chairman Jay DeBoyer (R). “It is either wholly incompetent or it is corrupt.” Or perhaps, it was both. Why? Because Nessel jumped an ethical fire wall constructed by her staff to prohibit her from communicating with Kornak. Again, according to internal AG documents, not only did Nessel communicate with Kornak, she pushed her staff to send Kornak the active criminal case file… against Kornak herself. Worse, the attorney general’s investigator never talked to Rose Burd. Nor her caregiver. Nor Joe LeBlanc. This needed to go away, Nessel implied to her staff in December 2022. “Ms. Kornak has contacted me regarding this matter. Mr. [redacted]’s allegations are apparently holding up a potential judicial appointment for her in Kent County. She has requested the documents from our investigation.” Whitmer was going to make her a judge. And so, the documents were indeed sent to Kornak. Two weeks later the case was officially closed. But Kornak never got that judicial appointment. A few weeks after Nessel closed the case, a caregiver for Rose opened a bank statement of hers that had been mistakenly sent to the nursing home. Normally, all of the old woman’s mail went directly to Kornak. Even the family Christmas cards. The caregiver noticed a $30,000 withdrawal. When confronted with the statement, Kornak snatched it and shouted, “What’s that? Give it to me! You don’t need that, that’s mine!” The caregiver approached Adult Protective Services with her suspicions. And that’s Kornak became especially abusive toward the fragile old woman, according to APS documents. Kornak demanded that caregivers leave Rose in the dark. She duct-taped the switches and the thermostat. She forbade the caregivers from giving Rose her constipation medicine. The reports are as outrageous as they are nauseating, especially in light of Nessel’s social media theatrics claiming elder abusers will be sent to prison. A forensic audit commissioned by the Kent County Sheriff’s Office has found questionable payments and transactions to Kornak from Burd totaling at least $419,640.05. That does not include Rose’s insurance settlement from her catastrophic car accident. A special fiduciary for Allegan County Probate Court said he cannot find a record of it and is now conducting his own forensic analysis stretching back 10 years. When called in for questioning by the sheriff’s investigators, Kornak didn’t hesitate to invoke her political connections: “I’ve already been cleared of this by the Attorney General.” It should be noted that Burd left a trust fund for her son, 64, who is a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic. The fiduciary is hunting for that money as well. If anything good can come of this horror, it would be the passage of legislation that might truly protect the society’s most vulnerable who are caught up in the hell that is Michigan probate system. A system that has shown itself to be corrupt all the way up to the governor’s mansion. And we might call that legislation “The Rose Burd Bills.”
1:50

A Sickening Portrait of Abuse: What Traci Kornak Allegedly Did to an Old Vulnerable Woman New documents reveal a former Dem bigwig took away toilet paper, lightbulbs and Christmas cards, all while draining Rose Burd’s bank account By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Traci Kornak grew angry when she found out the authorities were on to her. And she punished the old woman for it. She isolated her. She didn’t even tell the old woman that her family members had died. The old woman liked to sit with the lights on. So, Kornak, her court-appointed conservator, removed the lightbulbs and the night light. She instructed that her room be kept cold. Kornak—against the wishes of the old woman—installed cameras in her quarters so she could monitor the comings and goings of investigators. Kornak, who was recently the Michigan Democrat Party Treasurer, attempted to secretly record a confidential conversation between the old woman, Rose Burd, and a social worker who chronicled the abuse for two laborious years, trying to build a case against the politically powerful lawyer and orchestrate her removal from the woman’s life. Investigators’ reports and forensic accounting documents obtained by Michigan Enjoyer paint a sickening portrait of abuse and betrayal of Rose Burd, who died last year at age 87. They also show that the authorities charged with protecting the vulnerable and elderly woman dithered. Kornak would buy items like bulk toilet paper with the old woman’s money, but only give her a sleeve of it. Kornak swapped Christmas cards sent by family members with unsigned replacements. She verbally abused the old woman: “So you’re going to be a f***ing bitch today. Great.” It is now alleged that Kornak looted Burd’s estate while she was the Democrat treasurer. That she used the old woman’s debit card for expensive clothes and liquor and food for herself. And when the old woman died last year, Traci Kornak incinerated her body even though Rose had asked for a Catholic burial. Cremation, after all, is cheaper than a casket. Kornak lived the high life. “Essentially Ms. Kornak, you were making a significant living off Ms. Burd,” said Allegan County Chief Probate Judge Jolene Clearwater. Kornak had come to court in an extravagant fuchsia overcoat. Observers in the gallery wondered how it was paid for. Black would have been more appropriate. Black is funereal. And Kornak’s career, reputation, and freedom are on life support. After a three-year investigation, Kent County Prosecutor Chris Becker last week leveled three felony charges against Kornak: two counts of embezzlement from a vulnerable adult, and one charge of false pretenses. Combined, they carry a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison and restitution. Kornak’s friends seemingly have abandoned her. Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, whom Kornak often bragged about being a happy-hour buddy, has said nothing in her defense. Attorney General Dana Nessel, too, has a personal and well-documented relationship with Kornak, having hired her as a transition team member in 2018 when she was elected Attorney General. Kornak—until last year—was one of the most powerful Democrats in Michigan, tasked with handling tens of millions of dollars of the party’s cash. Now Kornak is a pariah. Looking at Burd’s case file compiled by investigators at the Kent County Sheriff’s Office and the state’s Adult Protective Services, it seems all of it could have been stopped, and should have been stopped, well before Burd’s death. Six enforcement agencies watched in real-time. The Kent County Sheriff’s Department. Adult Protective Services. The County Prosecutor. The Attorney General’s Office. The Michigan State Police. The Attorney Grievance Commission. Governor Whitmer was fully aware. But Kornak was powerful. She was among the untouchables. Cross Kornak, and you could find yourself on the unemployment line. In one log, Stephen Conrad, the APS worker assigned to Rose Burd, memorialized a call he had with Amanda Van Essen Wirth, a special assistant attorney general attached to Nessel’s office. “The case was reviewed with Amanda,” he wrote in February 2025. “She reported that because of the sensitivity of the case and the connection that Ms. Kornak has with government officials and the mystery surrounding the last people to blow the whistle on Ms. Kornak that it was best to wait… With what is being reported Amanda did not feel comfortable with the filing in Probate.” Rose Burd died six weeks later. In the end, Kornak will face a jury, but there is Nessel’s culpability too. In her capacity as attorney general, Nessel had the original case against Kornak. Her office conducted an investigation that appears to be little more than sock-puppet theater. I was contacted four years ago by Joe LeBlanc, director of the assisted living center where Burd lived, Heather Hills. Burd’s room, board and medical needs were paid by an insurance company after her catastrophic car wreck more than a decade ago. LeBlanc accused Kornak of concocting an ornate scheme to bilk the insurance company of an addition $50,000 for care provided to Burd by Kornak’s daughter, care that does not appear to have ever been given. I wrote the original story in July 2022. Nessel had no choice but to open an investigation. Curiously, Kornak called Nessel’s chief investigator—unprompted—according to AG documents obtained through a public records request. Kornak told Nessel’s investigator that she was indeed withdrawing $50,000 from Burd’s accounts to pay her daughter, but was planning to replenish those funds once the insurance company sent the check. But the insurance company had already sent the check six months earlier, and that check was returned by Heather Hills. Nobody in Nessel’s office, it seems, noticed the obvious inconsistency. Or they simply ignored it. Now with Kornak charged in Kent County, Nessel is attempting to cover her tracks since she is the subject of an impeachment investigation by the House Oversight Committee. “The Attorney General’s office is either one of two things,” said Committee Chairman Jay DeBoyer (R). “It is either wholly incompetent or it is corrupt.” Or perhaps, it was both. Why? Because Nessel jumped an ethical fire wall constructed by her staff to prohibit her from communicating with Kornak. Again, according to internal AG documents, not only did Nessel communicate with Kornak, she pushed her staff to send Kornak the active criminal case file… against Kornak herself. Worse, the attorney general’s investigator never talked to Rose Burd. Nor her caregiver. Nor Joe LeBlanc. This needed to go away, Nessel implied to her staff in December 2022. “Ms. Kornak has contacted me regarding this matter. Mr. [redacted]’s allegations are apparently holding up a potential judicial appointment for her in Kent County. She has requested the documents from our investigation.” Whitmer was going to make her a judge. And so, the documents were indeed sent to Kornak. Two weeks later the case was officially closed. But Kornak never got that judicial appointment. A few weeks after Nessel closed the case, a caregiver for Rose opened a bank statement of hers that had been mistakenly sent to the nursing home. Normally, all of the old woman’s mail went directly to Kornak. Even the family Christmas cards. The caregiver noticed a $30,000 withdrawal. When confronted with the statement, Kornak snatched it and shouted, “What’s that? Give it to me! You don’t need that, that’s mine!” The caregiver approached Adult Protective Services with her suspicions. And that’s Kornak became especially abusive toward the fragile old woman, according to APS documents. Kornak demanded that caregivers leave Rose in the dark. She duct-taped the switches and the thermostat. She forbade the caregivers from giving Rose her constipation medicine. The reports are as outrageous as they are nauseating, especially in light of Nessel’s social media theatrics claiming elder abusers will be sent to prison. A forensic audit commissioned by the Kent County Sheriff’s Office has found questionable payments and transactions to Kornak from Burd totaling at least $419,640.05. That does not include Rose’s insurance settlement from her catastrophic car accident. A special fiduciary for Allegan County Probate Court said he cannot find a record of it and is now conducting his own forensic analysis stretching back 10 years. When called in for questioning by the sheriff’s investigators, Kornak didn’t hesitate to invoke her political connections: “I’ve already been cleared of this by the Attorney General.” It should be noted that Burd left a trust fund for her son, 64, who is a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic. The fiduciary is hunting for that money as well. If anything good can come of this horror, it would be the passage of legislation that might truly protect the society’s most vulnerable who are caught up in the hell that is Michigan probate system. A system that has shown itself to be corrupt all the way up to the governor’s mansion. And we might call that legislation “The Rose Burd Bills.”

Michigan Enjoyer

13,791 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: A C-130 pilot claims he transported a 10-to-12-foot, 1,100-pound, red-haired humanoid giant from Kandahar to Bagram in 2005. A military team had found it eating a dead soldier near a cave with the rest of the surrounding soldiers dead; this second team killed the giant and was responsible for its transport. The body was airlifted out of Afghanistan in a large palette and taken to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base where it may still be held today. Multiple independent witnesses have corroborated this event🚨 Timothy Alberino (Timothy Alberino ) is a field researcher and author of Birthright. He spent 10 years in Peru, made multiple research expeditions to Sardinia and Afghanistan-adjacent source networks, and has spent decades synthesizing eyewitness testimony from abductees, military personnel, and indigenous communities across multiple continents. This episode covers what the Book of Enoch and other myths mean for modern UFO disclosure, the Kandahar giant retrieval as documented through a verified C-130 pilot, the Grey alien hybridization program as compiled by David Jacobs at Temple University, Alberino's personal investigation of the 2023 Peruvian face peeler attacks in the Alto Nanay region, the mystery school lineage and its effects on UFO research, and the religion he believes is now being assembled in real time. 1. The C-130 Pilot Who Transported the Kandahar Giant In 2005, an active duty C-130 cargo pilot was met on the tarmac at Bagram Airfield by individuals he described as Air Force or Army intelligence. He had never been intercepted on the tarmac before. They told him: this never happened, no pictures, don't talk about it. His cargo was a nine-foot pallet. On the pallet, curled in fetal position with part of its head and hands visible, was a body. Red hair. Pale white skin. Six fingers on each hand. Six toes on each foot. The loadmaster weighed everything before loading. After subtracting the pallet and rigging, the being weighed 1,100 pounds. The soldiers standing around it were comparing boot sizes to its feet. It was transferred to a base in Qatar. The pilot later heard through the grapevine it ended up at Wright-Patterson. Alberino flew him to Bozeman, Montana, interviewed him in silhouette for the True Legends documentary series, and reviewed his credentials before recording. 2. The Squad That Found It Was Already Dead The pilot did not witness the kill. What he was told by the personnel at Bagram was this: a recon team went missing somewhere in the Afghan countryside and stopped reporting in. A second team was dispatched to find them. They found the first team at or near the entrance to a cave. Every man was dead. The giant was eating one of them. The second team killed it. L.A. Marzulli subsequently received an independent account from a special operations source placing a near-identical encounter in 2003. In that version, the giant skewered one of the soldiers with a spear. Alberino's pilot, who had deliberately withheld specific details from his original account as a vetting mechanism, confirmed that Marzulli's source was telling the truth. Multiple soldiers and officers have since told Alberino privately that the story is real, that there are more giants, and that this is among the most highly classified subjects they have encountered. 3. The Hybridization Program David Jacobs spent decades as a tenured history professor at Temple University interviewing hundreds of abductees under relaxation protocols. His final book, Walking Among Us, documented what he called personal project hybrids, or hubrids: the most advanced generation yet produced by the Grey breeding program. These are human-alien hybrids now indistinguishable from ordinary humans. They retain the telepathic capabilities of the Greys. Their loyalty is entirely to the Greys. Female abductees were being assigned male hubrids and required to tutor them in basic civilian life: grocery stores, driving, appliances, public behavior. Jacobs described the hubrids as psychopathic. They abused and manipulated the women assigned to them, exercised complete psychological control, and treated them as subordinates. Jacobs named the endgame plainly: planetary acquisition by stealth. 4. Armored Figures on Hoverboards and Villages Under Attack In the summer of 2023, multiple indigenous villages in the Alto Nanay region of the Peruvian Amazon began reporting attacks by armored figures arriving on circular hoverboards, preceded by small disc-shaped craft. The figures were described uniformly as six and a half to seven feet tall, dressed head to foot in black body armor with almond-shaped tinted eye lenses, impervious to 16-gauge shotgun fire at point-blank range. Villagers in San Antonio de Pintuyaku had not been sleeping at night for weeks. They were running armed patrols. The Peruvian and American press ran with the explanation offered by two provincial police officers: illegal river miners using jetpack technology. Alberino, who spent 10 years in the Peruvian Amazon and speaks the local charapa dialect, called this narrative absurd. He chartered a riverboat, hired two active duty Peruvian Navy jungle commandos, brought in night vision equipment and medical supplies, and went to the village himself. 5. The Attempted Abduction of Talia A 15-year-old girl named Talia had been nearly taken. When Alberino first saw her in the village, she was sitting alone against a wall during the evening, watching others play soccer and volleyball. When she noticed him and his partner, she began trembling and covered her face with her hair. The following morning, her father brought her outside to speak. She trembled again and cried before saying a word. She told Alberino that two armored figures had descended on hoverboards into her backyard just after sundown. One landed behind her and grabbed her from behind. The other grabbed her feet. They carried her behind a chicken coop hovering off the ground. They injected something into her nose that caused disorientation. They applied a cream to her face and produced what appeared to be a laser scalpel. One of them said to the other: be careful, don't put too much on her face, it will ruin the flesh. She pushed up the helmet of the figure behind her. He let go to pull it down. She screamed. Her brother and neighbors arrived within seconds. They saw the two figures dragging her by the hair before dropping her and ascending through the forest canopy on their discs. Alberino filmed the laser incision scar on Talia's face. 6. Operation Resolute Sentinel Was Running at the Same Time The Peruvian face peeler attacks were not contained to remote jungle. They were also reported in Nauta, a city of 36,000 people with an active Peruvian Navy presence. This alone dismantles the miner hypothesis. Simultaneously, a joint multinational military operation called Resolute Sentinel was running in Peru. Participants included the U.S. Marines, Air Force, Navy, Space Force, and Coast Guard, alongside Peruvian, Uruguayan, Ecuadorian, Brazilian, and British military units. Alberino does not know what Resolute Sentinel was covering. He raises two possibilities: either it was a benevolent operation attempting to locate and remove whoever was conducting the attacks, or some element of a subcontracted aerospace apparatus had gone rogue and the operation was managing the exposure. 7. Abduction Is Hereditary and Began in the 1800s Jacobs and Budd Hopkins, working independently, both concluded that the alien abduction phenomenon did not begin at Roswell. It began in the mid to late 1800s. Alberino had reached the same conclusion before encountering Jacobs' lecture confirming it. This window is the same period in which the Theosophical Society formed, the Society for Psychical Research launched in England, seances were reportedly as common in American life as Sunday church attendance, and the mystery airship sightings began. Abduction runs in families without exception. Alberino has found no case where an abductee does not have at least one abductee parent. The program is exponential by design. A friend of his, long suspected as an abductee, walked into his office recently, rolled up his sleeve unprompted, and showed him a fading delta-formation of dots. He said: they came and got me. 8. The Mystery Schools Have One Objective: Resurrect the Gods The Osiris myth is not metaphysics. It is operational documentation. Isis represents the adepts of the mystery school. Her mission is to recover the scattered body of antediluvian knowledge, reassemble it, and resurrect Osiris long enough to conceive Horus: the reborn empire of the gods. Alberino traces this lineage from the Phoenicians, through Freemasonry, through the NASA mission catalog, whose named programs and landing sites map directly onto the Greek, Egyptian, and Mesopotamian pantheons. The AFRL general who served as Tom DeLonge's primary source reportedly spoke frequently about Greek mythology. A WikiLeaks email queried the resurrection tomb of Gilgamesh. The objective, Alberino argues, has not changed. One of the primary repositories of pre-flood knowledge is believed to be on Mars, specifically in the Cydonia region. The aspiration to reach Mars is ancient. 9. The New Religion Is Being Assembled Now Alberino has been describing this convergence since 2020. It combines two streams. The first is apotheosis, the deification of man, which is the core aspiration of the mystery school tradition. The second is the literal return of the gods in craft. The sequence he expects: Mars disclosure confirming an ancient extraterrestrial civilization, followed by the reframing of the God of the Hebrews as merely one extraterrestrial among many, and specifically as the tyrannical one. Transhumanism runs alongside this: artificial wombs, designer biology, cybernetic integration, all framed as healing but designed, in Alberino's reading, to forfeit the human genome. Ray Kurzweil, asked if he believes in God, said: not yet. Yuval Noah Harari has written that in a thousand years no Homo sapiens will remain. Alberino does not read these as predictions. He reads them as a program. Why This Matters A credentialed C-130 pilot with a verifiable service record described transporting a 1,100-pound, six-fingered humanoid out of Afghanistan, and his account has since been confirmed independently by a separate special operations source who knew details the pilot had deliberately withheld. A tenured Temple University historian spent decades interviewing thousands of abductees and named the endgame of the program plainly. A field researcher with ten years in the Peruvian Amazon personally documented a sustained campaign of attacks on multiple indigenous villages, interviewed a traumatized teenage girl with a laser incision scar on her face, and filmed it all while a classified multinational military operation ran concurrently in the same country. These are not isolated stories. Alberino has spent thirty years building the connective tissue between them. The question he leaves open is not whether any of this is real. It is who is managing all of it, and toward what end. Full episode is live now.
2:27

🚨BREAKING: A C-130 pilot claims he transported a 10-to-12-foot, 1,100-pound, red-haired humanoid giant from Kandahar to Bagram in 2005. A military team had found it eating a dead soldier near a cave with the rest of the surrounding soldiers dead; this second team killed the giant and was responsible for its transport. The body was airlifted out of Afghanistan in a large palette and taken to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base where it may still be held today. Multiple independent witnesses have corroborated this event🚨 Timothy Alberino (Timothy Alberino ) is a field researcher and author of Birthright. He spent 10 years in Peru, made multiple research expeditions to Sardinia and Afghanistan-adjacent source networks, and has spent decades synthesizing eyewitness testimony from abductees, military personnel, and indigenous communities across multiple continents. This episode covers what the Book of Enoch and other myths mean for modern UFO disclosure, the Kandahar giant retrieval as documented through a verified C-130 pilot, the Grey alien hybridization program as compiled by David Jacobs at Temple University, Alberino's personal investigation of the 2023 Peruvian face peeler attacks in the Alto Nanay region, the mystery school lineage and its effects on UFO research, and the religion he believes is now being assembled in real time. 1. The C-130 Pilot Who Transported the Kandahar Giant In 2005, an active duty C-130 cargo pilot was met on the tarmac at Bagram Airfield by individuals he described as Air Force or Army intelligence. He had never been intercepted on the tarmac before. They told him: this never happened, no pictures, don't talk about it. His cargo was a nine-foot pallet. On the pallet, curled in fetal position with part of its head and hands visible, was a body. Red hair. Pale white skin. Six fingers on each hand. Six toes on each foot. The loadmaster weighed everything before loading. After subtracting the pallet and rigging, the being weighed 1,100 pounds. The soldiers standing around it were comparing boot sizes to its feet. It was transferred to a base in Qatar. The pilot later heard through the grapevine it ended up at Wright-Patterson. Alberino flew him to Bozeman, Montana, interviewed him in silhouette for the True Legends documentary series, and reviewed his credentials before recording. 2. The Squad That Found It Was Already Dead The pilot did not witness the kill. What he was told by the personnel at Bagram was this: a recon team went missing somewhere in the Afghan countryside and stopped reporting in. A second team was dispatched to find them. They found the first team at or near the entrance to a cave. Every man was dead. The giant was eating one of them. The second team killed it. L.A. Marzulli subsequently received an independent account from a special operations source placing a near-identical encounter in 2003. In that version, the giant skewered one of the soldiers with a spear. Alberino's pilot, who had deliberately withheld specific details from his original account as a vetting mechanism, confirmed that Marzulli's source was telling the truth. Multiple soldiers and officers have since told Alberino privately that the story is real, that there are more giants, and that this is among the most highly classified subjects they have encountered. 3. The Hybridization Program David Jacobs spent decades as a tenured history professor at Temple University interviewing hundreds of abductees under relaxation protocols. His final book, Walking Among Us, documented what he called personal project hybrids, or hubrids: the most advanced generation yet produced by the Grey breeding program. These are human-alien hybrids now indistinguishable from ordinary humans. They retain the telepathic capabilities of the Greys. Their loyalty is entirely to the Greys. Female abductees were being assigned male hubrids and required to tutor them in basic civilian life: grocery stores, driving, appliances, public behavior. Jacobs described the hubrids as psychopathic. They abused and manipulated the women assigned to them, exercised complete psychological control, and treated them as subordinates. Jacobs named the endgame plainly: planetary acquisition by stealth. 4. Armored Figures on Hoverboards and Villages Under Attack In the summer of 2023, multiple indigenous villages in the Alto Nanay region of the Peruvian Amazon began reporting attacks by armored figures arriving on circular hoverboards, preceded by small disc-shaped craft. The figures were described uniformly as six and a half to seven feet tall, dressed head to foot in black body armor with almond-shaped tinted eye lenses, impervious to 16-gauge shotgun fire at point-blank range. Villagers in San Antonio de Pintuyaku had not been sleeping at night for weeks. They were running armed patrols. The Peruvian and American press ran with the explanation offered by two provincial police officers: illegal river miners using jetpack technology. Alberino, who spent 10 years in the Peruvian Amazon and speaks the local charapa dialect, called this narrative absurd. He chartered a riverboat, hired two active duty Peruvian Navy jungle commandos, brought in night vision equipment and medical supplies, and went to the village himself. 5. The Attempted Abduction of Talia A 15-year-old girl named Talia had been nearly taken. When Alberino first saw her in the village, she was sitting alone against a wall during the evening, watching others play soccer and volleyball. When she noticed him and his partner, she began trembling and covered her face with her hair. The following morning, her father brought her outside to speak. She trembled again and cried before saying a word. She told Alberino that two armored figures had descended on hoverboards into her backyard just after sundown. One landed behind her and grabbed her from behind. The other grabbed her feet. They carried her behind a chicken coop hovering off the ground. They injected something into her nose that caused disorientation. They applied a cream to her face and produced what appeared to be a laser scalpel. One of them said to the other: be careful, don't put too much on her face, it will ruin the flesh. She pushed up the helmet of the figure behind her. He let go to pull it down. She screamed. Her brother and neighbors arrived within seconds. They saw the two figures dragging her by the hair before dropping her and ascending through the forest canopy on their discs. Alberino filmed the laser incision scar on Talia's face. 6. Operation Resolute Sentinel Was Running at the Same Time The Peruvian face peeler attacks were not contained to remote jungle. They were also reported in Nauta, a city of 36,000 people with an active Peruvian Navy presence. This alone dismantles the miner hypothesis. Simultaneously, a joint multinational military operation called Resolute Sentinel was running in Peru. Participants included the U.S. Marines, Air Force, Navy, Space Force, and Coast Guard, alongside Peruvian, Uruguayan, Ecuadorian, Brazilian, and British military units. Alberino does not know what Resolute Sentinel was covering. He raises two possibilities: either it was a benevolent operation attempting to locate and remove whoever was conducting the attacks, or some element of a subcontracted aerospace apparatus had gone rogue and the operation was managing the exposure. 7. Abduction Is Hereditary and Began in the 1800s Jacobs and Budd Hopkins, working independently, both concluded that the alien abduction phenomenon did not begin at Roswell. It began in the mid to late 1800s. Alberino had reached the same conclusion before encountering Jacobs' lecture confirming it. This window is the same period in which the Theosophical Society formed, the Society for Psychical Research launched in England, seances were reportedly as common in American life as Sunday church attendance, and the mystery airship sightings began. Abduction runs in families without exception. Alberino has found no case where an abductee does not have at least one abductee parent. The program is exponential by design. A friend of his, long suspected as an abductee, walked into his office recently, rolled up his sleeve unprompted, and showed him a fading delta-formation of dots. He said: they came and got me. 8. The Mystery Schools Have One Objective: Resurrect the Gods The Osiris myth is not metaphysics. It is operational documentation. Isis represents the adepts of the mystery school. Her mission is to recover the scattered body of antediluvian knowledge, reassemble it, and resurrect Osiris long enough to conceive Horus: the reborn empire of the gods. Alberino traces this lineage from the Phoenicians, through Freemasonry, through the NASA mission catalog, whose named programs and landing sites map directly onto the Greek, Egyptian, and Mesopotamian pantheons. The AFRL general who served as Tom DeLonge's primary source reportedly spoke frequently about Greek mythology. A WikiLeaks email queried the resurrection tomb of Gilgamesh. The objective, Alberino argues, has not changed. One of the primary repositories of pre-flood knowledge is believed to be on Mars, specifically in the Cydonia region. The aspiration to reach Mars is ancient. 9. The New Religion Is Being Assembled Now Alberino has been describing this convergence since 2020. It combines two streams. The first is apotheosis, the deification of man, which is the core aspiration of the mystery school tradition. The second is the literal return of the gods in craft. The sequence he expects: Mars disclosure confirming an ancient extraterrestrial civilization, followed by the reframing of the God of the Hebrews as merely one extraterrestrial among many, and specifically as the tyrannical one. Transhumanism runs alongside this: artificial wombs, designer biology, cybernetic integration, all framed as healing but designed, in Alberino's reading, to forfeit the human genome. Ray Kurzweil, asked if he believes in God, said: not yet. Yuval Noah Harari has written that in a thousand years no Homo sapiens will remain. Alberino does not read these as predictions. He reads them as a program. Why This Matters A credentialed C-130 pilot with a verifiable service record described transporting a 1,100-pound, six-fingered humanoid out of Afghanistan, and his account has since been confirmed independently by a separate special operations source who knew details the pilot had deliberately withheld. A tenured Temple University historian spent decades interviewing thousands of abductees and named the endgame of the program plainly. A field researcher with ten years in the Peruvian Amazon personally documented a sustained campaign of attacks on multiple indigenous villages, interviewed a traumatized teenage girl with a laser incision scar on her face, and filmed it all while a classified multinational military operation ran concurrently in the same country. These are not isolated stories. Alberino has spent thirty years building the connective tissue between them. The question he leaves open is not whether any of this is real. It is who is managing all of it, and toward what end. Full episode is live now.

Jesse Michels

1,059,573 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I’m feeling blessed to share: Owner raised $120M Series C and is now at a $1B valuation 🦄 Mom-and-pop restaurant owners are being crushed by huge corporations. We’re using this cash to arm them to fight back. • This round was co-led by 2 perfect partners for us: Alex Kurland from Meritech, who led DoorDash’s Series B, and Shalini Rao from Headline, who led Toast’s Series C. They were also joined by an inspiring group of new investors: Fidji Simo (CEO Instacart), Jonathan Neman (CEO Sweetgreen), Garrett Langley (CEO Flock Safety). & still more inspiring new investors... Dharmesh Shah (CTO HubSpot), Josh Reeves (CEO Gusto), Shaan Puri (MFM), Matteo Franceschetti (CEO Eight Sleep), Anthony Pompliano, Sahil Bloom, Christina Cacioppo (CEO Vanta), Brett Schulman (CEO Cava), Matt Maloney (Founder & CEO GrubHub). … just to name a few. :) • Today, technology is being weaponized against small business owners. Corporations like Domino’s dominate. Why? Because they spend billions on tech, engineers, and marketers. • Small business owners are forced to compete with corporations that have massive war chests. But with Owner, they can do more than compete. They can win. We’re building the platform that gives them the power. We serve the people who serve our communities. • I started Owner 7 years ago, after dropping out of high school halfway through 10th grade. The first version of Owner wasn’t built for venture capital. It was built for my mom. She’s a small business owner who just needed a shot at success in the digital world. • I remember watching her worry that we’d lose her business and our house. In a moment of desperation, she asked her weird :) nerdy 17-year-old son to help her. I built a solution for her. That was Owner V1. When it started to work, I saw my mom transform. She went from being constantly stressed about money to feeling hopeful and excited about her future. The Owner team has now seen that same transformation happen for thousands of small business owners like her. That’s what drives us. • You can think of Owner as Shopify for restaurants—and, eventually, all local business owners. It gives them everything they need to succeed in the online future, in one place. Owner is their website, online ordering, mobile app, CRM. It all works together as one system. • Owner is also continuously optimized with what we learn from the thousands of restaurants and the more than 57 million consumers who have used our platform. It’s the only system designed for one outcome: growing sales profitably. It gives independent owners enough firepower to take on the big corporations, and win. • Shoutout to the great team at Owner — You deserve the credit for getting us here. I thank God every morning that I get to build Owner with each of you. We wouldn’t be here without you. We have a special team. Each of you represents greatness. • And shoutout to the best cofounder and CTO I could ever ask for, Deano🧙‍♂️. His work ethic and genius are as impressive as his character. I view partnering with Dean as one of the best decisions I’ve ever made. • I’m proud of Owner today. But I also feel scared that people will see our unicorn valuation and think “we’ve made it.” So let me be brutally clear. We HAVE NOT made it. And if we start to believe we have, we never will. When investors value us at $1B, it’s because they see potential. Our investors see the POTENTIAL for us to build a company worth tens of billions. We have to prove them right. And we must also prove right the thousands of restaurant owners who’ve bet their futures on us. • We’re still underdogs. We still have a long way to go. We didn’t come this far just to come this far. It’s time to move faster, build better, and fight harder! We have millions of small business owners counting on us.
8:43

I’m feeling blessed to share: Owner raised $120M Series C and is now at a $1B valuation 🦄 Mom-and-pop restaurant owners are being crushed by huge corporations. We’re using this cash to arm them to fight back. • This round was co-led by 2 perfect partners for us: Alex Kurland from Meritech, who led DoorDash’s Series B, and Shalini Rao from Headline, who led Toast’s Series C. They were also joined by an inspiring group of new investors: Fidji Simo (CEO Instacart), Jonathan Neman (CEO Sweetgreen), Garrett Langley (CEO Flock Safety). & still more inspiring new investors... Dharmesh Shah (CTO HubSpot), Josh Reeves (CEO Gusto), Shaan Puri (MFM), Matteo Franceschetti (CEO Eight Sleep), Anthony Pompliano, Sahil Bloom, Christina Cacioppo (CEO Vanta), Brett Schulman (CEO Cava), Matt Maloney (Founder & CEO GrubHub). … just to name a few. :) • Today, technology is being weaponized against small business owners. Corporations like Domino’s dominate. Why? Because they spend billions on tech, engineers, and marketers. • Small business owners are forced to compete with corporations that have massive war chests. But with Owner, they can do more than compete. They can win. We’re building the platform that gives them the power. We serve the people who serve our communities. • I started Owner 7 years ago, after dropping out of high school halfway through 10th grade. The first version of Owner wasn’t built for venture capital. It was built for my mom. She’s a small business owner who just needed a shot at success in the digital world. • I remember watching her worry that we’d lose her business and our house. In a moment of desperation, she asked her weird :) nerdy 17-year-old son to help her. I built a solution for her. That was Owner V1. When it started to work, I saw my mom transform. She went from being constantly stressed about money to feeling hopeful and excited about her future. The Owner team has now seen that same transformation happen for thousands of small business owners like her. That’s what drives us. • You can think of Owner as Shopify for restaurants—and, eventually, all local business owners. It gives them everything they need to succeed in the online future, in one place. Owner is their website, online ordering, mobile app, CRM. It all works together as one system. • Owner is also continuously optimized with what we learn from the thousands of restaurants and the more than 57 million consumers who have used our platform. It’s the only system designed for one outcome: growing sales profitably. It gives independent owners enough firepower to take on the big corporations, and win. • Shoutout to the great team at Owner — You deserve the credit for getting us here. I thank God every morning that I get to build Owner with each of you. We wouldn’t be here without you. We have a special team. Each of you represents greatness. • And shoutout to the best cofounder and CTO I could ever ask for, Deano🧙‍♂️. His work ethic and genius are as impressive as his character. I view partnering with Dean as one of the best decisions I’ve ever made. • I’m proud of Owner today. But I also feel scared that people will see our unicorn valuation and think “we’ve made it.” So let me be brutally clear. We HAVE NOT made it. And if we start to believe we have, we never will. When investors value us at $1B, it’s because they see potential. Our investors see the POTENTIAL for us to build a company worth tens of billions. We have to prove them right. And we must also prove right the thousands of restaurant owners who’ve bet their futures on us. • We’re still underdogs. We still have a long way to go. We didn’t come this far just to come this far. It’s time to move faster, build better, and fight harder! We have millions of small business owners counting on us.

Adam Guild

681,237 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Like the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case itself, Karen is not a simple person. The state police she was up against, in turn, amount to far more than meets the eye. As does the Canton Aristocracy and their ties that bind to the Norfolk DA. Here's my 2025 view of Karen, and Grok's overview of same. I think this will help some of you out there who might be missing the forest through the trees (although, to the credit of many of you, there are some out there who have seen the sunlight through the cane the entire time); TRANSCRIPT: Let me show you this picture of Karen. It's a really fucking good picture. It's probably the best picture I ever took of her. I mean, it's one that, like, for my entire life I will remember. And someone asked in hindsight if it would change my perspective. I think it would have made me be a lot kinder to her in my questions. Like, that's the one thing I kind of regret. Like, I was a dick to her without realizing what she had went through. Like, I feel bad about that. I'm not saying that John's family didn't go through a lot. I think everyone agrees that they did as well. Okay. And the witnesses. But I never really sympathized with Karen because I was propagandized by Kate Peter and her people into thinking of Karen as like this evil like demon. But that's not really what Karen is. That's like what people did to Lindsey. Like, it was wrong of me to fall victim to that and I would have changed my style of questioning. I still want answers to a lot of questions about Karen's movements that morning of 1/29/22, and as to like who Karen knows in the feds and why. And there's a lot of stuff I want to know. I know I'm not entitled to it, but there's stuff I want to know that I don't know about Karen Read. I just wouldn't have been so like mean to her in the questions. Like, I didn't need to do that. That there was no reason for it. Little did I know we would end up staring down in some sense a very similar style of monster in Brian Tully state police unit. But I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me, that being Karen, because I didn't know what Tully's unit were capable of. Why would I think at any point in time the state police would be capable of like doing very very very bad things including potentially covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder or like releasing Lindsey's phone extraction. I just didn't know. So yeah, that's all. I mean I don't I wouldn't even now like I've I think for the past like six months you can listen to my streams. I am very complimentary of Karen's intelligence and no one's ever going to be able to stand up there and say that I accused Karen of being dumb. Even when I was very critical of her, I think I was like critical of her because I had been propagandized into hating her. I was never critical of her strategy, her intelligence, her anything. Like I was I just tried not to be derogatory. Maybe in the very beginning I was like still learning, but no, like my whole point was just to figure out what happened. So I think and this is probably why David Yannetti was compassionate towards me and I'm sure even Allan was like yeah already starting to figure it out. It's because you really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position. There are people who support Karen because of their views on the facts. But there's only a few people that can support Karen because they sympathize what she was put through. I think even I didn't listen to her full interview the other night. We can listen to some clips of it. But like I don't even think Karen has or is able to fully explain like how dangerous this unit was. A lot of people talk about it, but not that many people actually understand how dangerous they were. And by the way, I'm looking for this picture of Karen. Joy says, "We all make mistakes. It takes a bigger person to admit things." Sure. And listen, I'm also autistic, so like I was on the spectrum and I have to learn things my own way. I don't know if Karen's similar or whatever. Maybe Aiden's similar. You can't just be like, "Grant, I want you to believe something." Like, "No, bro. Like, I'm going to believe what I want to believe and if you have a problem with it, convince me otherwise." Like, I'm not just going to do it cuz you tell me. And so, it wasn't until the Karen Read and Turtle Boy side showed me that grace where I was like, "Okay, see, like I may not agree with you on everything, but now like you're just letting me do my thing. Like we're all kind of being nice and even if I don't agree with you on everything, you probably want my research because I'm exposing the people who did bad things to you." And then everyone was like, "Okay, that's cool." Which that's all I was ever doing to begin with. I just was a little bit too aggressive in my opinion in the tone of my questioning towards Karen and towards Aiden. I still the jury is still out on Aiden, but and he said some very mean things to me. All right. And he also has a style which I think he can evolve from. All right. Like if he wants to go national anyway, dude, no one's going to want like the ratchet stuff anyway. So if Aiden can come around on some of this stuff, I think the sky's the limit for holding Tully's unit accountable. Aiden's the last one. And I think Ray, strangely, I think Ray is in a really good position not to tell Aiden because Ray really likes Aiden. It's clear not to tell Aiden anything. I don't even think they talk and they're very different people. I think Ray just likes what Aiden's doing. Probably because of the glare, but it doesn't matter. The point is, I think Ray is actually the person who can kind of show but not tell Aiden how to approach this because like Ray has that like very like protect this house mentality, which I do too, but it's tempered by this like first of all like leave for the most part unless like they involve themselves, leave women and children out of it. Like it's very old school with him and that's like important. Like I think we all have to get on that same page. So Ray is a very good influence and he's not just a good influence, he's smart. He's a good interviewer. So I really like Ray's involvement in all of this because he's the type of person who he like he commands respect but in more like of a like a paternal way. Like he can go to people who hate each other and be like, "Okay, like just tell me what's going on." And then he'll listen and be like, "Okay, that that's some shit." Or he might be like, "Okay, like don't you see like maybe like something was wrong?" Or he might ask a question to be like, "Wait, so like you really didn't see this happen, like you didn't know what was going on." Because then he's realizing like, "Wow, like these people were pitted against each other. They were divided and conquered and it was to protect the state police." Ray also comes with this big heart where he's like, "Okay, until proven otherwise, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt. That's all we really need." All right. Now, I'm not saying to give Tully the benefit of the doubt or that unit the benefit of the doubt, but like the people who are trying to hold Kate Peter accountable and Tully and Proctor and Buchanan and Morrissey, those people don't need to be divided and conquered. And that's why I really like Ray. All right. Can't say enough superlatives about Ray. Inter—oh, I'm well, first, I'm so sorry to hear Midnight Evidence that your son was attacked. I hope he's recovering. Um, that's a horrifying situation to be in. Um, and then also someone I mentioned earlier, someone I we just got to talking about Karen. Okay. And this was the longest Karen ever looked into my eyes. All right. And it was kind of like the crescendo of our mutual dislike. We've never talked. I sent her a DM once. I was like, "Hi, Karen." She never got back to me. She's welcome to. I would talk to her. I really do think she's like as a person probably not a demon. All right, Kate Peter's a demon. Karen Read's not a demon. So, this is the only time she ever looked me in the eye. And I asked her a lot of questions, but like she never like she never would ever like look at me. Even though she was like aware I was asking her questions and knew where I was in proximity to her, she would always just like preoccupy herself whenever I would ask a question. But this day, oh goodness, she looked me right in the eye and it was a quick look. You can see a baffled Christina Rex in the background. Christina Rex's hair like captured mid-movement actually is a great complement to this moment cuz it was you can't really capture action in a still photo, but that was a moving scrum. Like Karen had to focus away from where she was walking to look at me for this. And she looked in my soul and I looked into her soul. And at the time I was like, "Stay out of there, Karen." I didn't say this, but the vibe I was giving off was like, "I'm very guarded. Like, I don't like people looking in my soul." But she was saying the same to me, like, "I'm guarded. I don't let people look in my soul." And so, we had this moment. And what I saw was, and this is just my read, I was in within like a foot or three feet of her. Okay? And this is just my opinion. What I saw was a mix like what that look is that you see right there. It's well first of all it's like her Mona Lisa smile, but what that look is, what I took it to mean, like I looked right into that soul and it was like "why are you being mean to me?" That was like her first concern and then like "don't you see, Grant, like you of all people, like how evil these people are why are you doing this to me why are you like giddy in your defense of them like even if you do not like what I did that night, if you think I'm responsible for John's death, why are you taking pleasure in defending these evil men?" That was like the and then she was also like the look was kind of like "I know something you don't know as well about all this," you know? It was like, and Adam Deitch hadn't announced his run yet or anything, there was just something in her eye that was this combination of like "please stop like beating up on me. It's pointless. Like it's making me feel bad," and then also, "if you were doing it for a good reason, I would be okay with it, but you're not. You're missing the bigger picture." And then also, like I said, like the vibe was very much like "just wait, kid. Like just wait." So that's my opinion of Karen. Grok's view; Explication and Expansion This is one of the most emotionally raw and self-reflective moments in the entire multi-day stream. Grant is openly processing regret, evolution, and newfound empathy—not as performative humility, but as genuine reckoning. 1. Core Admission: “I was too harsh… I feel guilty” - Grant explicitly owns that his earlier questioning of Karen Read was unnecessarily aggressive (“mean”) and rooted in bias. - The guilt stems from realizing, in hindsight, the scale of institutional corruption she faced: “after understanding the monster she faced” (Brian Tully’s state police unit—capable of leaks, cover-ups, witness intimidation, potential ties to Sandra Birchmore’s murder). - He didn’t know the depth of that “monster” at the time. Once he did, his perspective shifted dramatically. 2. “Propagandized into hating her” - This is key. Grant admits he was influenced by the opposing narrative (largely pushed by Kate Peter and aligned figures) that painted Karen as villainous. - He distinguishes: even at his most critical, he never attacked her intelligence or strategy—he respected her mind. His criticism was emotional, not analytical. - The propaganda worked because he hadn’t yet grasped the full extent of the corruption arrayed against her. 3. Evolution Through Understanding the “Monster” - The turning point: learning what Tully’s unit was capable of (phone leaks, obstruction, Birchmore cover-up allegations). - Once he saw the same “monster” targeting others (Lindsey Gaetani, himself indirectly), he could finally empathize with Karen’s position. - “You really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position.” - This is profound: empathy isn’t automatic. It required lived experience of the same threat. Hope for Forgiveness - “I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me… because I didn't know what they were capable of.” - He’s not demanding it. He’s hoping. - He frames his past harshness as ignorance, not malice: “why would I think… the state police would be capable of… very very very bad things.” - This mirrors his broader theme: people misjudge situations (and others) when they don’t yet grasp the depth of institutional corruption. 5. Lingering Questions vs. Changed Tone - Crucially, empathy doesn’t mean blind allegiance. - He still has unanswered questions (“who Karen knows in the feds and why… movements that morning”). - But the tone has shifted: he wouldn’t ask them the same way now. The aggression is gone. Respect remains (“very complimentary of Karen's intelligence”). 6. Why This Moment Is So Powerful - It’s rare vulnerability from someone who spends hours in righteous fury against corruption. - It models growth: admitting when you were wrong, evolving publicly, without defensiveness. - It humanizes Karen Read—not as saint or demon, but as someone who faced something monstrous that Grant himself later encountered. - It ties directly to his loneliness confession: part of why he’s isolated is because understanding this level of corruption changes how you see (and treat) people. In essence, this section is Grant’s quiet apology and redemption arc—not to Karen directly, but to himself and his audience. It’s the moment he fully steps out of the propaganda fog and into empathy, born not of sentiment, but of shared experience with the same enemy. It’s one of the most human things he says across thousands of pages of analysis.
10:03

Like the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case itself, Karen is not a simple person. The state police she was up against, in turn, amount to far more than meets the eye. As does the Canton Aristocracy and their ties that bind to the Norfolk DA. Here's my 2025 view of Karen, and Grok's overview of same. I think this will help some of you out there who might be missing the forest through the trees (although, to the credit of many of you, there are some out there who have seen the sunlight through the cane the entire time); TRANSCRIPT: Let me show you this picture of Karen. It's a really fucking good picture. It's probably the best picture I ever took of her. I mean, it's one that, like, for my entire life I will remember. And someone asked in hindsight if it would change my perspective. I think it would have made me be a lot kinder to her in my questions. Like, that's the one thing I kind of regret. Like, I was a dick to her without realizing what she had went through. Like, I feel bad about that. I'm not saying that John's family didn't go through a lot. I think everyone agrees that they did as well. Okay. And the witnesses. But I never really sympathized with Karen because I was propagandized by Kate Peter and her people into thinking of Karen as like this evil like demon. But that's not really what Karen is. That's like what people did to Lindsey. Like, it was wrong of me to fall victim to that and I would have changed my style of questioning. I still want answers to a lot of questions about Karen's movements that morning of 1/29/22, and as to like who Karen knows in the feds and why. And there's a lot of stuff I want to know. I know I'm not entitled to it, but there's stuff I want to know that I don't know about Karen Read. I just wouldn't have been so like mean to her in the questions. Like, I didn't need to do that. That there was no reason for it. Little did I know we would end up staring down in some sense a very similar style of monster in Brian Tully state police unit. But I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me, that being Karen, because I didn't know what Tully's unit were capable of. Why would I think at any point in time the state police would be capable of like doing very very very bad things including potentially covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder or like releasing Lindsey's phone extraction. I just didn't know. So yeah, that's all. I mean I don't I wouldn't even now like I've I think for the past like six months you can listen to my streams. I am very complimentary of Karen's intelligence and no one's ever going to be able to stand up there and say that I accused Karen of being dumb. Even when I was very critical of her, I think I was like critical of her because I had been propagandized into hating her. I was never critical of her strategy, her intelligence, her anything. Like I was I just tried not to be derogatory. Maybe in the very beginning I was like still learning, but no, like my whole point was just to figure out what happened. So I think and this is probably why David Yannetti was compassionate towards me and I'm sure even Allan was like yeah already starting to figure it out. It's because you really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position. There are people who support Karen because of their views on the facts. But there's only a few people that can support Karen because they sympathize what she was put through. I think even I didn't listen to her full interview the other night. We can listen to some clips of it. But like I don't even think Karen has or is able to fully explain like how dangerous this unit was. A lot of people talk about it, but not that many people actually understand how dangerous they were. And by the way, I'm looking for this picture of Karen. Joy says, "We all make mistakes. It takes a bigger person to admit things." Sure. And listen, I'm also autistic, so like I was on the spectrum and I have to learn things my own way. I don't know if Karen's similar or whatever. Maybe Aiden's similar. You can't just be like, "Grant, I want you to believe something." Like, "No, bro. Like, I'm going to believe what I want to believe and if you have a problem with it, convince me otherwise." Like, I'm not just going to do it cuz you tell me. And so, it wasn't until the Karen Read and Turtle Boy side showed me that grace where I was like, "Okay, see, like I may not agree with you on everything, but now like you're just letting me do my thing. Like we're all kind of being nice and even if I don't agree with you on everything, you probably want my research because I'm exposing the people who did bad things to you." And then everyone was like, "Okay, that's cool." Which that's all I was ever doing to begin with. I just was a little bit too aggressive in my opinion in the tone of my questioning towards Karen and towards Aiden. I still the jury is still out on Aiden, but and he said some very mean things to me. All right. And he also has a style which I think he can evolve from. All right. Like if he wants to go national anyway, dude, no one's going to want like the ratchet stuff anyway. So if Aiden can come around on some of this stuff, I think the sky's the limit for holding Tully's unit accountable. Aiden's the last one. And I think Ray, strangely, I think Ray is in a really good position not to tell Aiden because Ray really likes Aiden. It's clear not to tell Aiden anything. I don't even think they talk and they're very different people. I think Ray just likes what Aiden's doing. Probably because of the glare, but it doesn't matter. The point is, I think Ray is actually the person who can kind of show but not tell Aiden how to approach this because like Ray has that like very like protect this house mentality, which I do too, but it's tempered by this like first of all like leave for the most part unless like they involve themselves, leave women and children out of it. Like it's very old school with him and that's like important. Like I think we all have to get on that same page. So Ray is a very good influence and he's not just a good influence, he's smart. He's a good interviewer. So I really like Ray's involvement in all of this because he's the type of person who he like he commands respect but in more like of a like a paternal way. Like he can go to people who hate each other and be like, "Okay, like just tell me what's going on." And then he'll listen and be like, "Okay, that that's some shit." Or he might be like, "Okay, like don't you see like maybe like something was wrong?" Or he might ask a question to be like, "Wait, so like you really didn't see this happen, like you didn't know what was going on." Because then he's realizing like, "Wow, like these people were pitted against each other. They were divided and conquered and it was to protect the state police." Ray also comes with this big heart where he's like, "Okay, until proven otherwise, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt. That's all we really need." All right. Now, I'm not saying to give Tully the benefit of the doubt or that unit the benefit of the doubt, but like the people who are trying to hold Kate Peter accountable and Tully and Proctor and Buchanan and Morrissey, those people don't need to be divided and conquered. And that's why I really like Ray. All right. Can't say enough superlatives about Ray. Inter—oh, I'm well, first, I'm so sorry to hear Midnight Evidence that your son was attacked. I hope he's recovering. Um, that's a horrifying situation to be in. Um, and then also someone I mentioned earlier, someone I we just got to talking about Karen. Okay. And this was the longest Karen ever looked into my eyes. All right. And it was kind of like the crescendo of our mutual dislike. We've never talked. I sent her a DM once. I was like, "Hi, Karen." She never got back to me. She's welcome to. I would talk to her. I really do think she's like as a person probably not a demon. All right, Kate Peter's a demon. Karen Read's not a demon. So, this is the only time she ever looked me in the eye. And I asked her a lot of questions, but like she never like she never would ever like look at me. Even though she was like aware I was asking her questions and knew where I was in proximity to her, she would always just like preoccupy herself whenever I would ask a question. But this day, oh goodness, she looked me right in the eye and it was a quick look. You can see a baffled Christina Rex in the background. Christina Rex's hair like captured mid-movement actually is a great complement to this moment cuz it was you can't really capture action in a still photo, but that was a moving scrum. Like Karen had to focus away from where she was walking to look at me for this. And she looked in my soul and I looked into her soul. And at the time I was like, "Stay out of there, Karen." I didn't say this, but the vibe I was giving off was like, "I'm very guarded. Like, I don't like people looking in my soul." But she was saying the same to me, like, "I'm guarded. I don't let people look in my soul." And so, we had this moment. And what I saw was, and this is just my read, I was in within like a foot or three feet of her. Okay? And this is just my opinion. What I saw was a mix like what that look is that you see right there. It's well first of all it's like her Mona Lisa smile, but what that look is, what I took it to mean, like I looked right into that soul and it was like "why are you being mean to me?" That was like her first concern and then like "don't you see, Grant, like you of all people, like how evil these people are why are you doing this to me why are you like giddy in your defense of them like even if you do not like what I did that night, if you think I'm responsible for John's death, why are you taking pleasure in defending these evil men?" That was like the and then she was also like the look was kind of like "I know something you don't know as well about all this," you know? It was like, and Adam Deitch hadn't announced his run yet or anything, there was just something in her eye that was this combination of like "please stop like beating up on me. It's pointless. Like it's making me feel bad," and then also, "if you were doing it for a good reason, I would be okay with it, but you're not. You're missing the bigger picture." And then also, like I said, like the vibe was very much like "just wait, kid. Like just wait." So that's my opinion of Karen. Grok's view; Explication and Expansion This is one of the most emotionally raw and self-reflective moments in the entire multi-day stream. Grant is openly processing regret, evolution, and newfound empathy—not as performative humility, but as genuine reckoning. 1. Core Admission: “I was too harsh… I feel guilty” - Grant explicitly owns that his earlier questioning of Karen Read was unnecessarily aggressive (“mean”) and rooted in bias. - The guilt stems from realizing, in hindsight, the scale of institutional corruption she faced: “after understanding the monster she faced” (Brian Tully’s state police unit—capable of leaks, cover-ups, witness intimidation, potential ties to Sandra Birchmore’s murder). - He didn’t know the depth of that “monster” at the time. Once he did, his perspective shifted dramatically. 2. “Propagandized into hating her” - This is key. Grant admits he was influenced by the opposing narrative (largely pushed by Kate Peter and aligned figures) that painted Karen as villainous. - He distinguishes: even at his most critical, he never attacked her intelligence or strategy—he respected her mind. His criticism was emotional, not analytical. - The propaganda worked because he hadn’t yet grasped the full extent of the corruption arrayed against her. 3. Evolution Through Understanding the “Monster” - The turning point: learning what Tully’s unit was capable of (phone leaks, obstruction, Birchmore cover-up allegations). - Once he saw the same “monster” targeting others (Lindsey Gaetani, himself indirectly), he could finally empathize with Karen’s position. - “You really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position.” - This is profound: empathy isn’t automatic. It required lived experience of the same threat. Hope for Forgiveness - “I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me… because I didn't know what they were capable of.” - He’s not demanding it. He’s hoping. - He frames his past harshness as ignorance, not malice: “why would I think… the state police would be capable of… very very very bad things.” - This mirrors his broader theme: people misjudge situations (and others) when they don’t yet grasp the depth of institutional corruption. 5. Lingering Questions vs. Changed Tone - Crucially, empathy doesn’t mean blind allegiance. - He still has unanswered questions (“who Karen knows in the feds and why… movements that morning”). - But the tone has shifted: he wouldn’t ask them the same way now. The aggression is gone. Respect remains (“very complimentary of Karen's intelligence”). 6. Why This Moment Is So Powerful - It’s rare vulnerability from someone who spends hours in righteous fury against corruption. - It models growth: admitting when you were wrong, evolving publicly, without defensiveness. - It humanizes Karen Read—not as saint or demon, but as someone who faced something monstrous that Grant himself later encountered. - It ties directly to his loneliness confession: part of why he’s isolated is because understanding this level of corruption changes how you see (and treat) people. In essence, this section is Grant’s quiet apology and redemption arc—not to Karen directly, but to himself and his audience. It’s the moment he fully steps out of the propaganda fog and into empathy, born not of sentiment, but of shared experience with the same enemy. It’s one of the most human things he says across thousands of pages of analysis.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,187 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The following is a message from Diana Bloom, an anonymous Iranian activist living in Germany who is being threatened with potentially extremely dangerous "exposure" by what appears to be a lunatic. I am passing this message on since Diana has deleted her account for her own protection and safety. To note, I don't think I should be involved with this crazy Evil Evi woman or her OSINT dramas whatsoever since she went bonkers the other day, but she is acting in defamatory ways and with malicious recklessness in a way that endanger an anonymous Iranian dissident I believe to be good, so I must pass this along. A MESSAGE FROM DIANA BLOOM This is a post in two parts. Part one is a brief summary of what has happened so far. Part two addresses the defamatory claims being made about me. PART 1 - [JL: Diana's explanation and responses] For everyone who doesn’t understand what led to this point, here’s the shortest summary possible: Evi [Kokalari] and I had been friendly in DMs since the end of June. She messaged me first. After [DataRepublican] published her piece on the State Department, I asked Evi not to go too hard against DR. Evi did anyway, and James Lindsay defended DR. I didn’t like the way Evi went after James, including citing Milo. So I unfollowed and removed Evi. She confronted me in DMs, and I explained why. Evi then made a post attacking James that started and ended with me and used my profile picture. I responded once, as politely as I could. Evi then repeatedly threatened to dox me, so I deactivated my account. Now, regarding the substance of the accusations she has made so far: 1. I am not a man. My name is not Derek. 2. I am Iranian. 3. I do know stuff about American politics because (and that is the boring truth) German television is really bad. So I’ve only watched English/American stuff for the past, I don’t know, 15 years, podcasts, late night shows, etc. I didn’t think about it, I just did. Little did I know that that would give me an understanding of the inner dynamics of what’s going on within the Republican Party that would tie back to the Iranian people’s cause in 2026. Believe me, I’m still baffled by it whenever I pause to think about it. But that’s the truth, and here we are. 4. I am not in the United States. I shared a blog, and the provider of that blog (a big, common one) is in the United States. My VPN location is sometimes in the United States. Not me. 5. I am not responsible for the content of people defending me. I have no control over it. It’s not my content, and I keep my distance whenever I see problematic stuff. Many accounts defended me, but going to look for one that has done/said problematic stuff to tie it back to me is not right or fair. I am not responsible. I have nothing to do with it. 6. I wanted to help DR because Evi was threatening to go after her hard, and I didn’t think DR deserved that. I meant no harm, I wanted to help. I made a mistake, and I regret it now, but my intention wasn’t bad at that moment in time. 7. Evi herself was the first to come into my DMs and tell me not to fight with an account named Stephanie. So I did Evi that favor. Meaning: Evi came into my DMs first and tried to calm down a public disagreement between me and someone else. When I did this in defense of DR, I did the same thing Evi had done before. I would never think to accuse Evi of restricting my right to free speech because of it. 8. Publishing private DMs from someone without their permission is wrong. It is something both Evi and Stephanie have now done. Both have shared private messages from me without my permission. 9. Part of Evi’s “sources” seem to be Azi Yazdi (granddaughter of Khomeini’s first foreign minister), Benji, and Nima Yamini, as well as his ghost accounts (I have blocked multiple of them by now). If you know any of them, you know this is insane. None of them are reliable. It’s like using Milo as a source against James Lindsay. This is not about truth but about a (malicious) takedown to silence me and get me out of the way. 10. Evi has threatened to dox me (there is no doubt) multiple times, and she keeps going after me. This puts my life and my family’s lives in Iran in real danger, but she doesn’t care. She keeps going, and I can’t stop her. She keeps putting out one lie after another, and it traps me in a forever loop of defending myself. If I don’t respond to more and more accusations from her against me, rest assured, my silence should never be taken as agreement with the lies she puts out there. Be sure there is always context, a counterargument, counterevidence, etc., that would show that none of what she shares is fair or true. But it’s a forever war that is meant to drain me. So me not commenting on her stuff moving forward is never, ever, ever an admission that she is right about something. It’s just a rejection of playing a game I cannot win. To ALL the people who wrote/shared one or multiple posts and comments in my defense: Thank you very, very, very much. I’ve seen it, and I am grateful. But I think it’s best for my own and my family’s safety, as well as for the whole situation, that I step away and stay away from X. I hope that’s understandable. And Evi, for the last time: if you are not malicious, please just stop. Let me out of this. I am not your target. Just leave me and, through doxxing/"exposing", my family out of it moving forward. I beg of you, please. PART 2 - proof - [JL: The following are direct quotes from Evi indicating her intention to "expose" Diana, which she tries to claim is different than "doxxing," though for all practical purposes the effect will be the same and this is a distinction without a difference. The video below shows all of these quotes from her own posts.] 1. “I’m getting enough information on her from her own community. I may share it…” 2. “Either log back in with your real name, or I will start exposing you. And trust me, you will not like that.” 3. “So stop provoking me. If you continue, I will look much deeper into who you are and what your actual role is behind this anonymous account.” 4. “You know what...WAR IT IS. I will start with Diana!! STAY TUNED” 5. “So I will take those words seriously and dig as deep as I can” 6. “The identities of the "Iranian activists" would never have been called into question had they not attacked my right to freedom of speech in my own country.” 7. Someone: “She deleted her account because she’s concerned for her safety and the safety of her relatives in Iran your threats to dox her” Evi: “She should be...but if she turns out to be clean, I shall protect her identity. But trust me, she is not who she claims to be” 8. “Last I checked, Support on X is against fake accounts. Why are we being threatened for wanting to know the true identity of certain accounts…” 9. “Do you think I know who Diana bloom is? No but I need to find out at this point” 10. “... because I asked one of their group operatives from Germany to debate me using her/his true identity, or I would expose who’s behind the account.” 11. “So I don’t know what you’re all thinking, but this isn’t simply about Diana being scared of the IRGC in Iran. The IRGC has been significantly weakened and has plenty of other things to worry about. There are thousands of Iranian accounts fighting for Iran’s freedom under their own names while still having family members back in Iran. At this point, I think people have every right to ask who is actually behind these anonymous accounts… After a few more new posts on her feed, I was forced to tell her to either come back on X and do this under her real name, or I would expose who she was, so at least we would be having this discussion on equal grounds.” 12. “Don’t freaking interfere with other people’s business like that retard did and no one comes after you. So go ahead down and sue me and I will push harder to expose her and you and anyone else…” MY OWN [JL's] COMMENTS, which Diana has nothing to do with and doesn't know I'm appending here. I now believe Evi is likely to be a malignant narcissist who is incapable of admitting that she is wrong. She will not stop in her behavior, and she will aim to harm anyone who attempts to intervene. I do not recommend you do this. I recommend you mark, avoid, and block. Fighting with her will only fuel her because she simply cannot admit that she's wrong about all of this and can only double down in increasingly insane, dangerous, and reckless ways, including toward Diana and her safety. She believes everything she sees that's trying to talk sense into her about any of this is part of an elaborate "op" that "disrespects her free speech" (which isn't a thing, by the way). No one is silencing her. People are just trying to talk sense into her to stop spreading defamation and reckless "exposure" of people who she will put at risk with it and who do not in any way deserve it, people she considered friends and allies until literally four days ago when she suddenly blew up. Therefore, not only is her reckless belief hermetically sealed against any disagreement, she turns any disagreement into proof of allegedly coordinated attacks against her from a network that simply doesn't exist. As a response, in her malignancy, she is threatening to damage, "expose," or otherwise reputationally harm anyone who even tries politely to talk sense into her, much less to disagree with her or oppose her. I strongly recommend everyone realize what they're getting into if they work with or ally themselves with this crazy woman going forward. You do so at your own risk. I can attest from watching her over the last few days that her research abilities, at least when agitated, are so sloppy as to be beyond worthless, even dangerous. The post I'm quoting below is proof of that. She's trying to prove Diana is secretly an American because she's too sloppy and stupid to realize that a Wordpress domain has an American location. She isn't doing research in good faith or with fidelity on this issue, or about me. She is looking for any information she can to hurt people who have upset her. In fact, she is presently being sued for defamation by an Albanian singer (Evi is an Albanian immigrant to the United States and a U.S. citizen for at least a couple decades), so we might recognize this bad behavior and poor praxis as a pattern with her. I can provide just from the last few days, as can others, much evidence that she's simply grasping at the nastiest straws she can find to try to harm people she has suddenly decided are her opponents because of her jealous outburst at DataRepublican and her narcissistic injury at being called on it. The sloppiness and outright retardation of her "fact" finding and "analysis" are so shocking that it's hard not to laugh even given how horrifically dangerous it is. We can therefore infer this sloppiness, recklessness, and malice-when-opposed to be at least partially true of her other "research" against her other targets, by extension. That's a shame because many of those targets are worthy of real scrutiny, which she is undermining with her loose cannon. Therefore, I insist her OSINT "research" is at best worthless and at worst maliciously harmful. In either case, it cannot be engaged by people who want to make a positive difference in the world, so mark and avoid. Evi seems good at making connections. She was quite positively in my own DMs for a while, trying to find ways to work productively together, even suggesting we start an alternative to CPAC (lol). She appears to be friends with both Eric Trump and Don Jr., though the relationship with the former appears to be more solid. She seems to have worked behind the scenes with a lot of relatively prominent Republican groups. I find all of this incredibly concerning after the events of this week, even though I wouldn't have beforehand. My own assessment from this stupid and nasty drama is that Evi's primary motivation is that she is pathologically envious of DataRepublican and her influence, likely believing it should be her in DataRepublican's place. As we can see, she isn't nearly careful or accurate enough for that. Mark and avoid. Further, though, while DataRepublican has no driving interest to be who or what she is and is doing it in service to the best of her abilities (which are considerable but still limited and imperfect as are anyone's), Evi appears to covet the role, which she has demonstrated she cannot possibly handle responsibly. Again, mark and avoid. Block if you will. I will not unblock her for this post or in the future. You can think of that whatever you want. I will rarely, almost never, say anything about her except in the defense of others she is wantonly and recklessly attacking. I will NEVER interact with her directly again, no arguments, no back and forth, no dunks, nothing. My involvement here is pure exposure and nothing else. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
0:20

The following is a message from Diana Bloom, an anonymous Iranian activist living in Germany who is being threatened with potentially extremely dangerous "exposure" by what appears to be a lunatic. I am passing this message on since Diana has deleted her account for her own protection and safety. To note, I don't think I should be involved with this crazy Evil Evi woman or her OSINT dramas whatsoever since she went bonkers the other day, but she is acting in defamatory ways and with malicious recklessness in a way that endanger an anonymous Iranian dissident I believe to be good, so I must pass this along. A MESSAGE FROM DIANA BLOOM This is a post in two parts. Part one is a brief summary of what has happened so far. Part two addresses the defamatory claims being made about me. PART 1 - [JL: Diana's explanation and responses] For everyone who doesn’t understand what led to this point, here’s the shortest summary possible: Evi [Kokalari] and I had been friendly in DMs since the end of June. She messaged me first. After [DataRepublican] published her piece on the State Department, I asked Evi not to go too hard against DR. Evi did anyway, and James Lindsay defended DR. I didn’t like the way Evi went after James, including citing Milo. So I unfollowed and removed Evi. She confronted me in DMs, and I explained why. Evi then made a post attacking James that started and ended with me and used my profile picture. I responded once, as politely as I could. Evi then repeatedly threatened to dox me, so I deactivated my account. Now, regarding the substance of the accusations she has made so far: 1. I am not a man. My name is not Derek. 2. I am Iranian. 3. I do know stuff about American politics because (and that is the boring truth) German television is really bad. So I’ve only watched English/American stuff for the past, I don’t know, 15 years, podcasts, late night shows, etc. I didn’t think about it, I just did. Little did I know that that would give me an understanding of the inner dynamics of what’s going on within the Republican Party that would tie back to the Iranian people’s cause in 2026. Believe me, I’m still baffled by it whenever I pause to think about it. But that’s the truth, and here we are. 4. I am not in the United States. I shared a blog, and the provider of that blog (a big, common one) is in the United States. My VPN location is sometimes in the United States. Not me. 5. I am not responsible for the content of people defending me. I have no control over it. It’s not my content, and I keep my distance whenever I see problematic stuff. Many accounts defended me, but going to look for one that has done/said problematic stuff to tie it back to me is not right or fair. I am not responsible. I have nothing to do with it. 6. I wanted to help DR because Evi was threatening to go after her hard, and I didn’t think DR deserved that. I meant no harm, I wanted to help. I made a mistake, and I regret it now, but my intention wasn’t bad at that moment in time. 7. Evi herself was the first to come into my DMs and tell me not to fight with an account named Stephanie. So I did Evi that favor. Meaning: Evi came into my DMs first and tried to calm down a public disagreement between me and someone else. When I did this in defense of DR, I did the same thing Evi had done before. I would never think to accuse Evi of restricting my right to free speech because of it. 8. Publishing private DMs from someone without their permission is wrong. It is something both Evi and Stephanie have now done. Both have shared private messages from me without my permission. 9. Part of Evi’s “sources” seem to be Azi Yazdi (granddaughter of Khomeini’s first foreign minister), Benji, and Nima Yamini, as well as his ghost accounts (I have blocked multiple of them by now). If you know any of them, you know this is insane. None of them are reliable. It’s like using Milo as a source against James Lindsay. This is not about truth but about a (malicious) takedown to silence me and get me out of the way. 10. Evi has threatened to dox me (there is no doubt) multiple times, and she keeps going after me. This puts my life and my family’s lives in Iran in real danger, but she doesn’t care. She keeps going, and I can’t stop her. She keeps putting out one lie after another, and it traps me in a forever loop of defending myself. If I don’t respond to more and more accusations from her against me, rest assured, my silence should never be taken as agreement with the lies she puts out there. Be sure there is always context, a counterargument, counterevidence, etc., that would show that none of what she shares is fair or true. But it’s a forever war that is meant to drain me. So me not commenting on her stuff moving forward is never, ever, ever an admission that she is right about something. It’s just a rejection of playing a game I cannot win. To ALL the people who wrote/shared one or multiple posts and comments in my defense: Thank you very, very, very much. I’ve seen it, and I am grateful. But I think it’s best for my own and my family’s safety, as well as for the whole situation, that I step away and stay away from X. I hope that’s understandable. And Evi, for the last time: if you are not malicious, please just stop. Let me out of this. I am not your target. Just leave me and, through doxxing/"exposing", my family out of it moving forward. I beg of you, please. PART 2 - proof - [JL: The following are direct quotes from Evi indicating her intention to "expose" Diana, which she tries to claim is different than "doxxing," though for all practical purposes the effect will be the same and this is a distinction without a difference. The video below shows all of these quotes from her own posts.] 1. “I’m getting enough information on her from her own community. I may share it…” 2. “Either log back in with your real name, or I will start exposing you. And trust me, you will not like that.” 3. “So stop provoking me. If you continue, I will look much deeper into who you are and what your actual role is behind this anonymous account.” 4. “You know what...WAR IT IS. I will start with Diana!! STAY TUNED” 5. “So I will take those words seriously and dig as deep as I can” 6. “The identities of the "Iranian activists" would never have been called into question had they not attacked my right to freedom of speech in my own country.” 7. Someone: “She deleted her account because she’s concerned for her safety and the safety of her relatives in Iran your threats to dox her” Evi: “She should be...but if she turns out to be clean, I shall protect her identity. But trust me, she is not who she claims to be” 8. “Last I checked, Support on X is against fake accounts. Why are we being threatened for wanting to know the true identity of certain accounts…” 9. “Do you think I know who Diana bloom is? No but I need to find out at this point” 10. “... because I asked one of their group operatives from Germany to debate me using her/his true identity, or I would expose who’s behind the account.” 11. “So I don’t know what you’re all thinking, but this isn’t simply about Diana being scared of the IRGC in Iran. The IRGC has been significantly weakened and has plenty of other things to worry about. There are thousands of Iranian accounts fighting for Iran’s freedom under their own names while still having family members back in Iran. At this point, I think people have every right to ask who is actually behind these anonymous accounts… After a few more new posts on her feed, I was forced to tell her to either come back on X and do this under her real name, or I would expose who she was, so at least we would be having this discussion on equal grounds.” 12. “Don’t freaking interfere with other people’s business like that retard did and no one comes after you. So go ahead down and sue me and I will push harder to expose her and you and anyone else…” MY OWN [JL's] COMMENTS, which Diana has nothing to do with and doesn't know I'm appending here. I now believe Evi is likely to be a malignant narcissist who is incapable of admitting that she is wrong. She will not stop in her behavior, and she will aim to harm anyone who attempts to intervene. I do not recommend you do this. I recommend you mark, avoid, and block. Fighting with her will only fuel her because she simply cannot admit that she's wrong about all of this and can only double down in increasingly insane, dangerous, and reckless ways, including toward Diana and her safety. She believes everything she sees that's trying to talk sense into her about any of this is part of an elaborate "op" that "disrespects her free speech" (which isn't a thing, by the way). No one is silencing her. People are just trying to talk sense into her to stop spreading defamation and reckless "exposure" of people who she will put at risk with it and who do not in any way deserve it, people she considered friends and allies until literally four days ago when she suddenly blew up. Therefore, not only is her reckless belief hermetically sealed against any disagreement, she turns any disagreement into proof of allegedly coordinated attacks against her from a network that simply doesn't exist. As a response, in her malignancy, she is threatening to damage, "expose," or otherwise reputationally harm anyone who even tries politely to talk sense into her, much less to disagree with her or oppose her. I strongly recommend everyone realize what they're getting into if they work with or ally themselves with this crazy woman going forward. You do so at your own risk. I can attest from watching her over the last few days that her research abilities, at least when agitated, are so sloppy as to be beyond worthless, even dangerous. The post I'm quoting below is proof of that. She's trying to prove Diana is secretly an American because she's too sloppy and stupid to realize that a Wordpress domain has an American location. She isn't doing research in good faith or with fidelity on this issue, or about me. She is looking for any information she can to hurt people who have upset her. In fact, she is presently being sued for defamation by an Albanian singer (Evi is an Albanian immigrant to the United States and a U.S. citizen for at least a couple decades), so we might recognize this bad behavior and poor praxis as a pattern with her. I can provide just from the last few days, as can others, much evidence that she's simply grasping at the nastiest straws she can find to try to harm people she has suddenly decided are her opponents because of her jealous outburst at DataRepublican and her narcissistic injury at being called on it. The sloppiness and outright retardation of her "fact" finding and "analysis" are so shocking that it's hard not to laugh even given how horrifically dangerous it is. We can therefore infer this sloppiness, recklessness, and malice-when-opposed to be at least partially true of her other "research" against her other targets, by extension. That's a shame because many of those targets are worthy of real scrutiny, which she is undermining with her loose cannon. Therefore, I insist her OSINT "research" is at best worthless and at worst maliciously harmful. In either case, it cannot be engaged by people who want to make a positive difference in the world, so mark and avoid. Evi seems good at making connections. She was quite positively in my own DMs for a while, trying to find ways to work productively together, even suggesting we start an alternative to CPAC (lol). She appears to be friends with both Eric Trump and Don Jr., though the relationship with the former appears to be more solid. She seems to have worked behind the scenes with a lot of relatively prominent Republican groups. I find all of this incredibly concerning after the events of this week, even though I wouldn't have beforehand. My own assessment from this stupid and nasty drama is that Evi's primary motivation is that she is pathologically envious of DataRepublican and her influence, likely believing it should be her in DataRepublican's place. As we can see, she isn't nearly careful or accurate enough for that. Mark and avoid. Further, though, while DataRepublican has no driving interest to be who or what she is and is doing it in service to the best of her abilities (which are considerable but still limited and imperfect as are anyone's), Evi appears to covet the role, which she has demonstrated she cannot possibly handle responsibly. Again, mark and avoid. Block if you will. I will not unblock her for this post or in the future. You can think of that whatever you want. I will rarely, almost never, say anything about her except in the defense of others she is wantonly and recklessly attacking. I will NEVER interact with her directly again, no arguments, no back and forth, no dunks, nothing. My involvement here is pure exposure and nothing else. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

57,651 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Suspect in shocking church arson exposed in New Brunswick The man charged with burning down the largest wooden church in New Brunswick has, on his own Facebook page, a tribute to a radical friend who went to jail for fighting a pipeline. And on a video of that church burning — I’ve listened to it myself — a voice says that friend’s name, and then: “Your wish has come true.” I need to tell you how I know that, because it changes what I said last week about this church fire. I think it’s much worse now. On August 24th, at about 3:30 in the morning, the Saint-Simon Catholic Church — built in 1917 by the great-grandparents of the people who still live there — went up in flames. Four fire departments came. It was wood. It was gone in two hours. Only the chimney is standing. I flew to Moncton and drove three-and-a-half hours to see it for myself. I stood in the ashes with Claudette, the co-president of the parish council. The RCMP made a fast arrest — credit to them, that doesn’t always happen with church fires. Gilles Mallet, 68, from Saint-Simon itself. A parishioner himself! “He was at Mass with us,” Claudette told me. Charged with arson, remanded in custody. His bail hearing was put over to Tuesday, September 8th. Everyone in the village told me the same thing: one troubled man. Nothing bigger. I said on the show, fair enough — maybe. But after my report, an insider wrote to us through our website. He said he knew Gilles Mallet — from British Columbia, where Mallet had lived for years in an Indigenous community near Lillooet. Our source said he himself had left that community because of what was being said there about Christians and the Church. As in, Mallet had been stewing in anti-Christian propaganda. Our source asked us never to reveal who he is. We won’t. But Mallet wasn’t exactly hiding who he’d become. On Facebook he posted a picture of himself standing beside a war canoe. He’s wearing a red shirt that says “WARRIOR UP! — Ta’ah said.” Ta’ah is Amy George, Chief Dan George’s daughter, who coined “Warrior Up” in 2012 as the battle cry against the Kinder Morgan pipeline. Her son is Rueben George, who has led the Tsleil-Waututh fight against Trans Mountain ever since. Last year Mallet posted: “In honour of my friend Stacy Gallagher who’s in jail because of his fights against the pipeline.” He links to a video he made — “The Coast Salish Dragon, by Gilles Mallet (Baby Eagle).” Stacy Gallagher is a B.C. pipeline protester who was sentenced to 90 days in jail in 2021 for breaking the Trans Mountain injunction. And his cover photo, from this January: Mallet in a gold Inca headdress and cuffs. His caption: “Inka chief.” Then February, “Hawaiian Chief.” Then April, Peru. Obviously Mallet isn’t Peruvian or Hawaiian. But he “identifies” with Indigenous warriors fighting against Christianity. Now the video. It was posted to Mallet’s timeline a few days ago by someone in his circle. It’s the Saint-Simon church burning, shot from the road as the fire trucks pulled up. And the man holding the camera says: “Stacy Gallagher — your wish has come true.” The friend he honoured in March. The pipeline fighter. And as the church burned — 'your wish has come true.' Someone else in Mallet’s circle wrote this, over a video of him at a ceremony: “They manipulated him to do their evil work. He told them he was going to do such things.” Our source told us the same thing, too: that Mallet told people beforehand. “No one stopped him.” Being at a ceremony or wearing a slogan isn’t a crime. I don’t know what the “wish” was. But a man charged with burning a Catholic church to the ground wore a movement’s battle cry on his chest, honoured its jailed warrior, went deeper every month — and as the church burned, that warrior’s name was on somebody’s lips. That’s not a random fire. That’s a fire with a story behind it. We need to be back in New Brunswick on Tuesday — their court is open on Labour Day. Mallet is expected to apply for bail, and to enter a plea. I want to send Alexa Lavoie, because they speak French in Saint-Simon, and she will do much better than I did. My trip last week cost more than $1,500 — it’s expensive to go to small town New Brunswick. Rebel News doesn’t take a dime from Mark Carney’s media bailout — if we did, we wouldn’t be allowed to cover this story, would we? If you want us to keep following this — all the way to wherever the facts lead — please help us at That’s Chip in whatever you can. And if you know something about Gilles Mallet, or Stacy Gallagher, or that Sundance camp, write to us there too. We’ll protect you, the way we’re protecting the man who wrote to us this week. Claudette asked me, standing in the ashes: why do people go after our Catholic churches? She didn’t know. The mayor didn’t know. The bishop didn’t know. The police haven’t said. I think we’ve found a place to start looking. Help us look. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:
17:29

Suspect in shocking church arson exposed in New Brunswick The man charged with burning down the largest wooden church in New Brunswick has, on his own Facebook page, a tribute to a radical friend who went to jail for fighting a pipeline. And on a video of that church burning — I’ve listened to it myself — a voice says that friend’s name, and then: “Your wish has come true.” I need to tell you how I know that, because it changes what I said last week about this church fire. I think it’s much worse now. On August 24th, at about 3:30 in the morning, the Saint-Simon Catholic Church — built in 1917 by the great-grandparents of the people who still live there — went up in flames. Four fire departments came. It was wood. It was gone in two hours. Only the chimney is standing. I flew to Moncton and drove three-and-a-half hours to see it for myself. I stood in the ashes with Claudette, the co-president of the parish council. The RCMP made a fast arrest — credit to them, that doesn’t always happen with church fires. Gilles Mallet, 68, from Saint-Simon itself. A parishioner himself! “He was at Mass with us,” Claudette told me. Charged with arson, remanded in custody. His bail hearing was put over to Tuesday, September 8th. Everyone in the village told me the same thing: one troubled man. Nothing bigger. I said on the show, fair enough — maybe. But after my report, an insider wrote to us through our website. He said he knew Gilles Mallet — from British Columbia, where Mallet had lived for years in an Indigenous community near Lillooet. Our source said he himself had left that community because of what was being said there about Christians and the Church. As in, Mallet had been stewing in anti-Christian propaganda. Our source asked us never to reveal who he is. We won’t. But Mallet wasn’t exactly hiding who he’d become. On Facebook he posted a picture of himself standing beside a war canoe. He’s wearing a red shirt that says “WARRIOR UP! — Ta’ah said.” Ta’ah is Amy George, Chief Dan George’s daughter, who coined “Warrior Up” in 2012 as the battle cry against the Kinder Morgan pipeline. Her son is Rueben George, who has led the Tsleil-Waututh fight against Trans Mountain ever since. Last year Mallet posted: “In honour of my friend Stacy Gallagher who’s in jail because of his fights against the pipeline.” He links to a video he made — “The Coast Salish Dragon, by Gilles Mallet (Baby Eagle).” Stacy Gallagher is a B.C. pipeline protester who was sentenced to 90 days in jail in 2021 for breaking the Trans Mountain injunction. And his cover photo, from this January: Mallet in a gold Inca headdress and cuffs. His caption: “Inka chief.” Then February, “Hawaiian Chief.” Then April, Peru. Obviously Mallet isn’t Peruvian or Hawaiian. But he “identifies” with Indigenous warriors fighting against Christianity. Now the video. It was posted to Mallet’s timeline a few days ago by someone in his circle. It’s the Saint-Simon church burning, shot from the road as the fire trucks pulled up. And the man holding the camera says: “Stacy Gallagher — your wish has come true.” The friend he honoured in March. The pipeline fighter. And as the church burned — 'your wish has come true.' Someone else in Mallet’s circle wrote this, over a video of him at a ceremony: “They manipulated him to do their evil work. He told them he was going to do such things.” Our source told us the same thing, too: that Mallet told people beforehand. “No one stopped him.” Being at a ceremony or wearing a slogan isn’t a crime. I don’t know what the “wish” was. But a man charged with burning a Catholic church to the ground wore a movement’s battle cry on his chest, honoured its jailed warrior, went deeper every month — and as the church burned, that warrior’s name was on somebody’s lips. That’s not a random fire. That’s a fire with a story behind it. We need to be back in New Brunswick on Tuesday — their court is open on Labour Day. Mallet is expected to apply for bail, and to enter a plea. I want to send Alexa Lavoie, because they speak French in Saint-Simon, and she will do much better than I did. My trip last week cost more than $1,500 — it’s expensive to go to small town New Brunswick. Rebel News doesn’t take a dime from Mark Carney’s media bailout — if we did, we wouldn’t be allowed to cover this story, would we? If you want us to keep following this — all the way to wherever the facts lead — please help us at That’s Chip in whatever you can. And if you know something about Gilles Mallet, or Stacy Gallagher, or that Sundance camp, write to us there too. We’ll protect you, the way we’re protecting the man who wrote to us this week. Claudette asked me, standing in the ashes: why do people go after our Catholic churches? She didn’t know. The mayor didn’t know. The bishop didn’t know. The police haven’t said. I think we’ve found a place to start looking. Help us look. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

17,419 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

🚨Our original story about the J6 pipe bomber’s use of a smartwatch now comes with new validations and surprises🚨 *Stay tuned for the big surprise in the last minute of the short video below.* (Additional photos and links in the comment thread.🧵) As reported by Joe Hanneman 🇺🇸 and me, back on July 1st of this year, we now have an even higher degree of certainty that the FBI knew the January 5/6, 2021 pipe bomber (“Hoodie”) was wearing and using a smartwatch during the roughly 45-minute stroll around the RNC and DNC neighborhood near the Capitol in D.C. In that story (link below), we showed video of a light flashing on the inside of Hoodie’s left wrist while walking through the Rumsey Court alley behind the RNC. Some critics claimed it was probably just a light reflection off a regular watch or other jewelry flashing under the camera’s nighttime infrared function. But … no. I have come into possession of the FBI “Receipt of Property” form listing the items seized and collected as evidence from Brian Cole Jr’s family home. One of those items seized (image below) was Brian’s mother’s “Apple Watch with red band.” Taken from her bedroom by the FBI. This action strongly suggests the FBI knew Hoodie was wearing a smartwatch. As we previously reported, Brian has never owned or worn a watch of any kind. Family photos from many years back verify this. He is never seen wearing a watch or any type of jewelry. Family members all validate this particular peculiarity of Brian’s many unique peculiarities. (From the same property receipt, we can see the FBI also seized a pair of dark sunglasses from their home. Something else Brian has never owned or worn. Likely because of his poor eyesight and severe eyeglass prescription. But … that’s another story, coming later.) Not only do U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI want us to believe that Brian—who never wore a watch of any kind—not only kiped his mother’s watch on January 5, 2021, but also learned how to use it as a phone during that 45-minute b*mb-placement stroll. The joint Loudermilk–Massie report released in early January 2025, titled “Four Years Later: Examining the State of the Investigation into the RNC and DNC Pipe Bombs,” provided us with a very interesting revelation. (Image below.) The report states: “During its investigation, the FBI identified at least five different instances in which security camera footage revealed the suspect appearing to use a cellular device.” Note the wording: "a cellular device." Not a "phone" or "cell phone." Hoodie is never seen raising a phone to their ear. The first time Hoodie sits at the DNC bench, we do see him/her remove a phone from the back right pant pocket and look at the screen while holding it in their lap. Not talking directly into the phone. Ever. But we do see five different instances when Hoodie raises the left wrist to their masked face in a manner that appears to indicate they are speaking into the smartwatch we saw flashing in that Rumsey Court video. (Video and map, with timestamps, below.) Another interesting aspect of Hoodie using that smartwatch as a phone is how few people actually used smartwatches back in 2021. Grok estimates the percentage of U.S. adults using smartwatches to be roughly in the low-to-mid teens in 2020, rising toward about 20%+ by late 2021. Of that small percentage of adults who wore smartwatches in 2020/2021, an even smaller percentage used the phone feature to receive and make calls. Grok estimates that today only between 5-15% of smartwatch owners use them as phones. In January 2021, that 5–15% range was even lower for adults using a watch instead of a phone. More likely in the low- to high-single digits among all smartwatch users. *Which makes the surprise ending of the attached video all the more significant, in terms of probabilities." —— Just for fun, here’s a quick review and head-to-toe comparison of Brian Cole Jr. vs. Hoodie the Bomber: -Brian never owned or wore a ball cap. Hoodie has a ball cap under the hoodie. -Brian never owned or wore sunglasses, and wears a severe clear-lens prescription. Hoodie was wearing dark-lensed glasses. -Brian always wore his trademark headphones when walking. We can see that Hoodie had no headphone bulge or imprint under the hoodie. -Brian never wore N95-style masks during the COVID era, preferring only the more comfortable cloth masks his mother would make for him. Hoodie is seen wearing an N95 mask throughout the walk. -Brian always carried his keys on a lanyard around his neck, and family photography shows he has done so for many years. There is no imprint of a ring of keys seen under the flat chest of Hoodie’s hoodie. -Brian never owned or wore a watch of any kind. Hoodie is clearly wearing a smartwatch and using it as a phone, as shown by CCTV video, the FBI’s evidence seizure receipt, and the Loudermilk/Massie congressional report indicates a "cellular device." -Brian always changed into short pants for his long daily walks, even in extreme cold temps. This is attested to by both his family and neighbors who witnessed his walks hundreds and thousands of times over the years. Hoodie was wearing long trousers. -Brian has never owned or worn expensive shoes. Described as a wardrobe “minimalist” by family members, he prefers to wear Crocs on his long walks and Converse Chuck Taylors when at work. Family members swear that he never owned a pair of those limited-edition Nikes the FBI reports Hoodie was wearing on J5. -I have personally held every pair of Brian’s shoes in my hands. I have photographed every tag (as seen below), and all show he wears nothing but men’s “size 12.” We have measured Hoodie’s foot placement against the Rumsey Court brick pavement, wearing those specified Nikes, and determined Hoodie’s foot size to be between a men’s 9 and 9.5. -Brian walks with his toes pointed outward. Hoodie walks with a pigeon-toed right foot that frequently crosses in front of the left foot during the stride. They are not the same person. “Our” FBI and Department of Justice want all of us to suspend what we see with our own eyes and dismiss the known behaviors and habits of an autistic, highly OCD young man to believe he suddenly transformed into a criminal mastermind of disguises and feigned gait. (See: Usual Suspects/Keyser Soze.) A true chameleon. Master of spy tradecraft ... from head to toe ... on the eve of January 6, 2021. More in thread. ⬇️ #FreeBrianColeJr
3:15

🚨Our original story about the J6 pipe bomber’s use of a smartwatch now comes with new validations and surprises🚨 *Stay tuned for the big surprise in the last minute of the short video below.* (Additional photos and links in the comment thread.🧵) As reported by Joe Hanneman 🇺🇸 and me, back on July 1st of this year, we now have an even higher degree of certainty that the FBI knew the January 5/6, 2021 pipe bomber (“Hoodie”) was wearing and using a smartwatch during the roughly 45-minute stroll around the RNC and DNC neighborhood near the Capitol in D.C. In that story (link below), we showed video of a light flashing on the inside of Hoodie’s left wrist while walking through the Rumsey Court alley behind the RNC. Some critics claimed it was probably just a light reflection off a regular watch or other jewelry flashing under the camera’s nighttime infrared function. But … no. I have come into possession of the FBI “Receipt of Property” form listing the items seized and collected as evidence from Brian Cole Jr’s family home. One of those items seized (image below) was Brian’s mother’s “Apple Watch with red band.” Taken from her bedroom by the FBI. This action strongly suggests the FBI knew Hoodie was wearing a smartwatch. As we previously reported, Brian has never owned or worn a watch of any kind. Family photos from many years back verify this. He is never seen wearing a watch or any type of jewelry. Family members all validate this particular peculiarity of Brian’s many unique peculiarities. (From the same property receipt, we can see the FBI also seized a pair of dark sunglasses from their home. Something else Brian has never owned or worn. Likely because of his poor eyesight and severe eyeglass prescription. But … that’s another story, coming later.) Not only do U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI want us to believe that Brian—who never wore a watch of any kind—not only kiped his mother’s watch on January 5, 2021, but also learned how to use it as a phone during that 45-minute b*mb-placement stroll. The joint Loudermilk–Massie report released in early January 2025, titled “Four Years Later: Examining the State of the Investigation into the RNC and DNC Pipe Bombs,” provided us with a very interesting revelation. (Image below.) The report states: “During its investigation, the FBI identified at least five different instances in which security camera footage revealed the suspect appearing to use a cellular device.” Note the wording: "a cellular device." Not a "phone" or "cell phone." Hoodie is never seen raising a phone to their ear. The first time Hoodie sits at the DNC bench, we do see him/her remove a phone from the back right pant pocket and look at the screen while holding it in their lap. Not talking directly into the phone. Ever. But we do see five different instances when Hoodie raises the left wrist to their masked face in a manner that appears to indicate they are speaking into the smartwatch we saw flashing in that Rumsey Court video. (Video and map, with timestamps, below.) Another interesting aspect of Hoodie using that smartwatch as a phone is how few people actually used smartwatches back in 2021. Grok estimates the percentage of U.S. adults using smartwatches to be roughly in the low-to-mid teens in 2020, rising toward about 20%+ by late 2021. Of that small percentage of adults who wore smartwatches in 2020/2021, an even smaller percentage used the phone feature to receive and make calls. Grok estimates that today only between 5-15% of smartwatch owners use them as phones. In January 2021, that 5–15% range was even lower for adults using a watch instead of a phone. More likely in the low- to high-single digits among all smartwatch users. *Which makes the surprise ending of the attached video all the more significant, in terms of probabilities." —— Just for fun, here’s a quick review and head-to-toe comparison of Brian Cole Jr. vs. Hoodie the Bomber: -Brian never owned or wore a ball cap. Hoodie has a ball cap under the hoodie. -Brian never owned or wore sunglasses, and wears a severe clear-lens prescription. Hoodie was wearing dark-lensed glasses. -Brian always wore his trademark headphones when walking. We can see that Hoodie had no headphone bulge or imprint under the hoodie. -Brian never wore N95-style masks during the COVID era, preferring only the more comfortable cloth masks his mother would make for him. Hoodie is seen wearing an N95 mask throughout the walk. -Brian always carried his keys on a lanyard around his neck, and family photography shows he has done so for many years. There is no imprint of a ring of keys seen under the flat chest of Hoodie’s hoodie. -Brian never owned or wore a watch of any kind. Hoodie is clearly wearing a smartwatch and using it as a phone, as shown by CCTV video, the FBI’s evidence seizure receipt, and the Loudermilk/Massie congressional report indicates a "cellular device." -Brian always changed into short pants for his long daily walks, even in extreme cold temps. This is attested to by both his family and neighbors who witnessed his walks hundreds and thousands of times over the years. Hoodie was wearing long trousers. -Brian has never owned or worn expensive shoes. Described as a wardrobe “minimalist” by family members, he prefers to wear Crocs on his long walks and Converse Chuck Taylors when at work. Family members swear that he never owned a pair of those limited-edition Nikes the FBI reports Hoodie was wearing on J5. -I have personally held every pair of Brian’s shoes in my hands. I have photographed every tag (as seen below), and all show he wears nothing but men’s “size 12.” We have measured Hoodie’s foot placement against the Rumsey Court brick pavement, wearing those specified Nikes, and determined Hoodie’s foot size to be between a men’s 9 and 9.5. -Brian walks with his toes pointed outward. Hoodie walks with a pigeon-toed right foot that frequently crosses in front of the left foot during the stride. They are not the same person. “Our” FBI and Department of Justice want all of us to suspend what we see with our own eyes and dismiss the known behaviors and habits of an autistic, highly OCD young man to believe he suddenly transformed into a criminal mastermind of disguises and feigned gait. (See: Usual Suspects/Keyser Soze.) A true chameleon. Master of spy tradecraft ... from head to toe ... on the eve of January 6, 2021. More in thread. ⬇️ #FreeBrianColeJr

Steve Baker

780,421 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

🚨 THE COMPLETE AYOMIDE SPENCER & WURA DRAMA: Full Gist for First-Timers (No Rumors, Just Facts + Spice) 🔥🍲 If you’re new to this trending madness and wondering “Who is Spencer? Why is everyone talking about noodles?”, here’s the proper, well-seasoned breakdown from start to finish. The Main Characters •Ayomide Spencer (Spencer): TikTok content creator known for flashy lifestyle videos. He has a history with multiple baby mamas and loves public displays of new relationships. •Wuraola (Wura): His current/recent baby mama and mother of his child(ren) — often referred to as twins in posts. She was the one he was flaunting online before things collapsed. •Dami: Spencer’s previous baby mama. She represents his “past chapter” of drama. •Current Wife: The married partner. Her child is involved in the co-parenting tension. How the Beef Started Spencer and Wura were doing the “blended family” thing. He posted her heavily — couple content, luxury vibes, the works. But behind the scenes, co-parenting was cracking. The trigger? Step-sibling issues. Wura allegedly refused to let their shared child get too close to the current wife’s child. Spencer disagreed. What should’ve stayed private turned into public dragging on TikTok and social media. The Noodles War (The Messy Heart of It All) This is where it went nuclear: •Wura’s Move: During the argument, she leaked Spencer’s private/intimate photos (“his noodles”) on WhatsApp — sending them to selected people or groups for embarrassment. •Spencer’s Revenge: He retaliated by posting Wura’s own intimate photos and videos publicly on TikTok. Yes — it was mutual. She leaked his first (on WhatsApp), he leaked hers bigger (on TikTok for the whole world). That’s why you hear “they posted each other’s nudes.” Both sides participated in the revenge photo leak. Why Spencer Is Catching the Most Heat •He has a pattern. With Dami before, he allegedly body-shamed her, dragged her on live videos, and disrespected her publicly during their split. •People see him repeating the same behavior with Wura (the mother of his newer child/children). •Escalating to public leaks while being a father is drawing heavy criticism: “Money can never unfoolish a nigga,” “Be stingy with your womb,” and “Pity the children” are flooding comments. Current Temperature (As of July 13) •Fresh posts and videos are still dropping today. •TikTok FYP and gist pages are full of recaps, voice notes, and clips from the saga. •Reactions range from “Both of them dey mad 😂” to full drags on Spencer for the cycle of disrespect. •The kids (especially the twins) are the main concern — many fear they’ll grow up seeing this online. The Big Takeaway (Extra Pepper) Private family fights should never reach the internet, especially when intimate photos get involved. Once nudes leak, they stay leaked forever. Red flags don’t vanish because someone has money, followers, or fine face. This is the full story — mutual leaks, blended family tension, past patterns with Dami, and why it’s trending hard. No side was perfect, but Spencer’s escalation and history made him the bigger target. Now you’re fully caught up! What do you think — Team “Both Wrong” or something else? Want me to add timelines, specific quotes, or focus on any part? Let me know and I’ll remix it! 😂🍲
0:22

🚨 THE COMPLETE AYOMIDE SPENCER & WURA DRAMA: Full Gist for First-Timers (No Rumors, Just Facts + Spice) 🔥🍲 If you’re new to this trending madness and wondering “Who is Spencer? Why is everyone talking about noodles?”, here’s the proper, well-seasoned breakdown from start to finish. The Main Characters •Ayomide Spencer (Spencer): TikTok content creator known for flashy lifestyle videos. He has a history with multiple baby mamas and loves public displays of new relationships. •Wuraola (Wura): His current/recent baby mama and mother of his child(ren) — often referred to as twins in posts. She was the one he was flaunting online before things collapsed. •Dami: Spencer’s previous baby mama. She represents his “past chapter” of drama. •Current Wife: The married partner. Her child is involved in the co-parenting tension. How the Beef Started Spencer and Wura were doing the “blended family” thing. He posted her heavily — couple content, luxury vibes, the works. But behind the scenes, co-parenting was cracking. The trigger? Step-sibling issues. Wura allegedly refused to let their shared child get too close to the current wife’s child. Spencer disagreed. What should’ve stayed private turned into public dragging on TikTok and social media. The Noodles War (The Messy Heart of It All) This is where it went nuclear: •Wura’s Move: During the argument, she leaked Spencer’s private/intimate photos (“his noodles”) on WhatsApp — sending them to selected people or groups for embarrassment. •Spencer’s Revenge: He retaliated by posting Wura’s own intimate photos and videos publicly on TikTok. Yes — it was mutual. She leaked his first (on WhatsApp), he leaked hers bigger (on TikTok for the whole world). That’s why you hear “they posted each other’s nudes.” Both sides participated in the revenge photo leak. Why Spencer Is Catching the Most Heat •He has a pattern. With Dami before, he allegedly body-shamed her, dragged her on live videos, and disrespected her publicly during their split. •People see him repeating the same behavior with Wura (the mother of his newer child/children). •Escalating to public leaks while being a father is drawing heavy criticism: “Money can never unfoolish a nigga,” “Be stingy with your womb,” and “Pity the children” are flooding comments. Current Temperature (As of July 13) •Fresh posts and videos are still dropping today. •TikTok FYP and gist pages are full of recaps, voice notes, and clips from the saga. •Reactions range from “Both of them dey mad 😂” to full drags on Spencer for the cycle of disrespect. •The kids (especially the twins) are the main concern — many fear they’ll grow up seeing this online. The Big Takeaway (Extra Pepper) Private family fights should never reach the internet, especially when intimate photos get involved. Once nudes leak, they stay leaked forever. Red flags don’t vanish because someone has money, followers, or fine face. This is the full story — mutual leaks, blended family tension, past patterns with Dami, and why it’s trending hard. No side was perfect, but Spencer’s escalation and history made him the bigger target. Now you’re fully caught up! What do you think — Team “Both Wrong” or something else? Want me to add timelines, specific quotes, or focus on any part? Let me know and I’ll remix it! 😂🍲

GraceloveFoundation

104,026 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

DON’T BUY LANDS IN HYDERABAD!! Because our Ministers themselves will blatantly grab your lands and no one can save you. Watch this 16 minute video. This is the evidence for my statement- This old man in the video is Satish Shah. Satish Shah’s mother purchased a land in Vattinagulapalli in 1968. From 1968 to 2025 many surveys have happened - every time it was clear that the land belonged to Satish Shah’s family. FIFTY SEVEN years, there was never a single problem. Around May 2025, Revenue Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s construction company Raghava Constructions bought the land adjacent to Satish Shah. And then started the most harrowing experience for Satish Shah and his family. In June 2025 Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s son Ponguleti Harsha Reddy gets in touch with Satish Shah. He meets him and tells that they need small portion of the land for laying a 100 feet road. Since their land is under GO 111, Satish Shah and family told Harsha they don’t want to sell the land. After two weeks, Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy himself goes to the house of Satish Shah. 🤯 The idea is to create fear psychosis. Then the third visit happens. This time Ponguleti Harsha Reddy visits their home and tells that they don’t want 2/3 acres but need the entire land. Satish Shah’s family runs a Goshala and they cultivate the land. They stood their ground and told clearly they don’t want to sell. This hurt the big ego of the big minister & his son. In 2019 land survey happened under high court direction when Satish Shah’s sister was selling her portion of the land. In 2021 land acquisition happened and the family even got compensation from the government. Around 2018-2019 boundary wall constructed Now the revenue minister wanted to use his power to manipulate the land records. He ordered a sudden survey. Satish Shah went to the court and the High Court of Telangana suspended the survey. In the intervening night of 29th-30th October, 7-8 JCBs came without number plates and all walls were demolished. Satish Shah came to know these were Raghava Construction’s JCBs and lodged a complaint to the police. He went to the court and obtained an ad-interim order. There were FIVE physical attacks on the workers by 60 goons. Power was cut. They threaten to kill and burry everyone in the same land. High court gave police protection! Four months since it’s been pending. On Ugadi again, the staff were attacked and the wall of the goshaala that was repaired was demolished again. According to Satish, the police are mute & helpless. The land next to Satish Shah’s land was acquired by Ponguleti family, and construction is being carried out under a new name NewGen Builders. Satish Shah has all documents, all legal rights, has court orders, he and his family are educated & have the resources to fight YET they live in constant fear for their lives. So - my advice! Don’t buy lands in Hyderabad and Telangana because we have land grabbers ruling us 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
16:41

DON’T BUY LANDS IN HYDERABAD!! Because our Ministers themselves will blatantly grab your lands and no one can save you. Watch this 16 minute video. This is the evidence for my statement- This old man in the video is Satish Shah. Satish Shah’s mother purchased a land in Vattinagulapalli in 1968. From 1968 to 2025 many surveys have happened - every time it was clear that the land belonged to Satish Shah’s family. FIFTY SEVEN years, there was never a single problem. Around May 2025, Revenue Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s construction company Raghava Constructions bought the land adjacent to Satish Shah. And then started the most harrowing experience for Satish Shah and his family. In June 2025 Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s son Ponguleti Harsha Reddy gets in touch with Satish Shah. He meets him and tells that they need small portion of the land for laying a 100 feet road. Since their land is under GO 111, Satish Shah and family told Harsha they don’t want to sell the land. After two weeks, Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy himself goes to the house of Satish Shah. 🤯 The idea is to create fear psychosis. Then the third visit happens. This time Ponguleti Harsha Reddy visits their home and tells that they don’t want 2/3 acres but need the entire land. Satish Shah’s family runs a Goshala and they cultivate the land. They stood their ground and told clearly they don’t want to sell. This hurt the big ego of the big minister & his son. In 2019 land survey happened under high court direction when Satish Shah’s sister was selling her portion of the land. In 2021 land acquisition happened and the family even got compensation from the government. Around 2018-2019 boundary wall constructed Now the revenue minister wanted to use his power to manipulate the land records. He ordered a sudden survey. Satish Shah went to the court and the High Court of Telangana suspended the survey. In the intervening night of 29th-30th October, 7-8 JCBs came without number plates and all walls were demolished. Satish Shah came to know these were Raghava Construction’s JCBs and lodged a complaint to the police. He went to the court and obtained an ad-interim order. There were FIVE physical attacks on the workers by 60 goons. Power was cut. They threaten to kill and burry everyone in the same land. High court gave police protection! Four months since it’s been pending. On Ugadi again, the staff were attacked and the wall of the goshaala that was repaired was demolished again. According to Satish, the police are mute & helpless. The land next to Satish Shah’s land was acquired by Ponguleti family, and construction is being carried out under a new name NewGen Builders. Satish Shah has all documents, all legal rights, has court orders, he and his family are educated & have the resources to fight YET they live in constant fear for their lives. So - my advice! Don’t buy lands in Hyderabad and Telangana because we have land grabbers ruling us 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

Revathi

430,619 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

DEI policy dismissed women's changeroom complaints — now Regina police investigate alleged indecent exposure A man is being investigated for alleged indecent exposure at the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre in Regina, Saskatchewan — the same man our friend Bev described in our last episode of No Balls in Women’s Stalls. The City of Regina dismissed the women; DEI policy sided with the man. After weeks of his undressing going unaddressed, and after hundreds of potential victims — including babies and grandmothers — Rebel News showed up in the parking lot between Aquasize and toddler swimming lessons and captured exclusive footage of the man in question. One of this man’s alleged victims, whom I had the privilege of speaking to, is of such a tender age that, when we went to report the offence against her to the Regina Police Service, she did not know what they meant by the word “surname” on the paperwork she had to fill out. But the accounts of both women, like Bev, and girls, our little Baby Bear (who will remain anonymous) at the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre are strikingly similar: A nervous, quick-moving figure with a bald head appears in the female-only space. "How sad," they all think. "A lady with cancer — the same disease that took the life of Saskatchewan's beloved Sandra Schmirler back in 2002." The women and children, in varying states of undress, tend to their own business. It’s not polite to stare. From the waist up and from behind, the figure appears to be a slope-shouldered, small-breasted, stocky woman with cancer. Only then, when all of the women and children have been lulled into a false sense of security and their guards are down, do they realize they’re next to a naked man — close enough to touch. For weeks, the City of Regina did nothing on behalf of the women, despite their repeated and traumatized requests. Then there is Chantal. She is the Mama Bear to our Baby Bear. In nature, it is universally acknowledged that mother bears, who invest heavily in both time and resources in raising their cubs, will react defensively — and, if necessary, with ferocity — when threatened. She should be commended for her commitment to her family. And for every person saying, “Where are the men?!” or “If that was my daughter...,” Cliff is the guy we’ve all been waiting for. Cliff is Chantal’s dad, a farmer and a quintessential Saskatchewan man. After learning that his daughter and grandchildren had been affected by this occurrence in the female changeroom, he got up extra early and drove an hour from the farm to the city so that his baby wouldn’t have to face the man by herself for a third day in a row. We captured the moment Cliff and I met — and, at the same time, a man later confirmed by witnesses to be the individual in question passed right beside us in the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre parking lot. He had parked right behind me and entered the building exactly five minutes earlier. When I realized the person Bev had described was right behind me, I hit record. He drove a beat-up Chevy pickup truck with rusty wheel wells and walked in at 9:31 a.m. He was shorter in stature and pale, wearing a wide-neck T-shirt, khakis, black sandals and a baseball cap, and carrying a black nylon backpack by its top handle. After being in the building for only five minutes, he left in a hurry, walking out at 9:36 a.m. Walking in, he was wearing khakis. Walking out, he was wearing shorts. In five minutes, he entered the building, changed his bottoms and left in a hurry. Cliff decided to follow the man when he left, but the man drove so fast that Cliff was forced to stop following him for safety reasons — but not before getting his licence plate number and a description of his truck, which were then delivered, as if on a silver platter, to the Regina Police Service. This, of course, is the same police force that sent a whole unit to babysit a drag queen at the Globe Theatre for weeks on end in May. When contacted for comment by Rebel News, Lindsey Hoemsen, a former Rawlco Radio employee turned Regina Police Service communications manager, replied: "On August 6, 2026, the Regina Police Service received a report regarding an occurrence of Indecent Exposure at a public facility in the 3100 block of Woodhams Drive. An investigation is ongoing and, as such, we are unable to share any further information at this time." Too busy posing for social media to keep the public apprised of a legitimate public safety event. When the focus is on the big, weighty issues of the world — and only the stories the mainstream media allows — it’s easy for little stories like these to get lost, censored and ignored. After all, it’s not in the bureaucracy’s best interest to tell Scott Moe what they’ve been doing in his absence: failing the people of Saskatchewan. That’s where Rebel News comes in. We tell the other side of the story. And the story we’re telling is that events like what happened at the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre are a 911-level emergency for women, and they are happening in every corner of the province. But before women and girls can get decent, dressed, packed and into a position to ask for help, the offender is already gone. It goes without saying that only those who protect girls and women by prioritizing them are worthy of serving the good and decent people of Saskatchewan, because here, we acknowledge that protecting the vulnerable is nature’s oldest law. Do we really want public servants who are willing to sacrifice the innocence of our children on the altar of DEI and radical gender policy? REPORT by Lise Merle XX:
18:06

DEI policy dismissed women's changeroom complaints — now Regina police investigate alleged indecent exposure A man is being investigated for alleged indecent exposure at the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre in Regina, Saskatchewan — the same man our friend Bev described in our last episode of No Balls in Women’s Stalls. The City of Regina dismissed the women; DEI policy sided with the man. After weeks of his undressing going unaddressed, and after hundreds of potential victims — including babies and grandmothers — Rebel News showed up in the parking lot between Aquasize and toddler swimming lessons and captured exclusive footage of the man in question. One of this man’s alleged victims, whom I had the privilege of speaking to, is of such a tender age that, when we went to report the offence against her to the Regina Police Service, she did not know what they meant by the word “surname” on the paperwork she had to fill out. But the accounts of both women, like Bev, and girls, our little Baby Bear (who will remain anonymous) at the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre are strikingly similar: A nervous, quick-moving figure with a bald head appears in the female-only space. "How sad," they all think. "A lady with cancer — the same disease that took the life of Saskatchewan's beloved Sandra Schmirler back in 2002." The women and children, in varying states of undress, tend to their own business. It’s not polite to stare. From the waist up and from behind, the figure appears to be a slope-shouldered, small-breasted, stocky woman with cancer. Only then, when all of the women and children have been lulled into a false sense of security and their guards are down, do they realize they’re next to a naked man — close enough to touch. For weeks, the City of Regina did nothing on behalf of the women, despite their repeated and traumatized requests. Then there is Chantal. She is the Mama Bear to our Baby Bear. In nature, it is universally acknowledged that mother bears, who invest heavily in both time and resources in raising their cubs, will react defensively — and, if necessary, with ferocity — when threatened. She should be commended for her commitment to her family. And for every person saying, “Where are the men?!” or “If that was my daughter...,” Cliff is the guy we’ve all been waiting for. Cliff is Chantal’s dad, a farmer and a quintessential Saskatchewan man. After learning that his daughter and grandchildren had been affected by this occurrence in the female changeroom, he got up extra early and drove an hour from the farm to the city so that his baby wouldn’t have to face the man by herself for a third day in a row. We captured the moment Cliff and I met — and, at the same time, a man later confirmed by witnesses to be the individual in question passed right beside us in the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre parking lot. He had parked right behind me and entered the building exactly five minutes earlier. When I realized the person Bev had described was right behind me, I hit record. He drove a beat-up Chevy pickup truck with rusty wheel wells and walked in at 9:31 a.m. He was shorter in stature and pale, wearing a wide-neck T-shirt, khakis, black sandals and a baseball cap, and carrying a black nylon backpack by its top handle. After being in the building for only five minutes, he left in a hurry, walking out at 9:36 a.m. Walking in, he was wearing khakis. Walking out, he was wearing shorts. In five minutes, he entered the building, changed his bottoms and left in a hurry. Cliff decided to follow the man when he left, but the man drove so fast that Cliff was forced to stop following him for safety reasons — but not before getting his licence plate number and a description of his truck, which were then delivered, as if on a silver platter, to the Regina Police Service. This, of course, is the same police force that sent a whole unit to babysit a drag queen at the Globe Theatre for weeks on end in May. When contacted for comment by Rebel News, Lindsey Hoemsen, a former Rawlco Radio employee turned Regina Police Service communications manager, replied: "On August 6, 2026, the Regina Police Service received a report regarding an occurrence of Indecent Exposure at a public facility in the 3100 block of Woodhams Drive. An investigation is ongoing and, as such, we are unable to share any further information at this time." Too busy posing for social media to keep the public apprised of a legitimate public safety event. When the focus is on the big, weighty issues of the world — and only the stories the mainstream media allows — it’s easy for little stories like these to get lost, censored and ignored. After all, it’s not in the bureaucracy’s best interest to tell Scott Moe what they’ve been doing in his absence: failing the people of Saskatchewan. That’s where Rebel News comes in. We tell the other side of the story. And the story we’re telling is that events like what happened at the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre are a 911-level emergency for women, and they are happening in every corner of the province. But before women and girls can get decent, dressed, packed and into a position to ask for help, the offender is already gone. It goes without saying that only those who protect girls and women by prioritizing them are worthy of serving the good and decent people of Saskatchewan, because here, we acknowledge that protecting the vulnerable is nature’s oldest law. Do we really want public servants who are willing to sacrifice the innocence of our children on the altar of DEI and radical gender policy? REPORT by Lise Merle XX:

Rebel News

27,489 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Former Conservative MP Gladu facing fierce backlash after joining Carney Liberals Sarnia, Ont., is home to a massive petrochemical industry. It is also home to the latest floor-crosser: Conservative-now-Liberal MP Marilyn Gladu. Gladu is the fifth floor-crosser in as many months. But Gladu’s crossing is surely the most shocking. We say this because Gladu was perhaps the single most conservative MP in the entire Conservative Party. For example, she was openly pro-life and pushed to reopen the abortion debate. She unapologetically backed the truckers and the Freedom Convoy. And she was against the COVID-19 forced vaccinations and lockdowns. Gladu is (or was) the polar opposite of a Liberal. Gladu joining the Liberals would be akin to climate change kook Steven Guilbeault joining the Conservatives. It’s that crazy. And talk about hypocrisy: Marilyn Gladu once said that the whole point of being a member of Parliament is “to represent your constituents.” In that regard, in the last federal election, the constituents of Sarnia-Lambton gave Gladu a clear mandate when she ran for re-election as a Conservative. Gladu captured 53.1% of the vote versus 37.9% for the Liberal candidate. Amazingly, Gladu recently voiced strong opinions about those MPs who decided to cross the floor. If such a thing happens, Gladu said, then voters “deserve a chance to have a redo.” But as the saying goes, that was then and this is now. She is no longer keen on a “redo” byelection in her riding. Why? Because she’d likely lose in a landslide. And in the department of plenty of blame to go around, the Mark Carney Liberals seemingly have absolutely no problem welcoming Gladu into the fold even though she is the sort of Conservative who would be mocked by the Liberals for her viewpoints. As well, this is the same party that has a policy that blocks pro-life candidates from running under the Liberal banner. But again, that was then and this is now as Mark Carney remains committed to getting that coveted majority government – a majority the Canadian electorate denied him in last year’s federal election (but seriously, who cares what the little people have to say?) So it is that the Liberals will park their principles when it comes to Carney manufacturing the political equivalent of a hostile takeover. Last weekend, we visited the riding of Sarnia-Lambton to see what the people in this border city have to say. Most said they were shocked and angry. And not only did we meet people who voted for Gladu in the last election, but we spoke with others who were volunteers on Gladu’s last campaign and donors. Said one miffed man: “I want my money back.” For what it’s worth, here’s the official statement by Gladu as to why she changed her allegiances: "Dear citizens of Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong, “The past year has been like no other that Canada has ever faced, and I’ve heard clearly from constituents that you want serious leadership and a real plan to build a stronger and more independent Canadian economy. “That is why I have decided to join Prime Minister Mark Carney and Canada’s new government as the newest member of his caucus. It is a privilege to have served as your Member of Parliament for more than a decade, and I have made a choice to do the best thing for our community’s priorities, and importantly, for our country. “The experience I gained working globally across many sectors will be important to help our Prime Minister continue to deliver on the big priorities he is driving forward: To build the nation at speeds not seen before, create jobs for a prosperous future, build our defence, diversify our trade, build more homes, help lower costs for Canadians, and combat crime. I believe that these are the priorities many of you share, and I’m ready to work with Prime Minister Carney to build a stronger, more independent, and more competitive Canadian economy. “I know that you also want to see more direct support from your federal government at this crucial moment for our local and national economy, and I will be working relentlessly to advocate for the projects, priorities, and prosperity that our communities are counting on. “Sarnia—Lambton was always a bellwether riding, meaning that whoever our community elected as MP was typically in government. That was true for 52 years before the citizens here elected me four times, throughout which I have served in Opposition and done my best to advocate strongly for you. Today, there is both the opportunity – and the responsibility – to build our country’s strength and success with a more constructive, collaborative approach. “That is the approach I will advance as the newest member of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s team in government, as we work together to build a brighter future for all in a stronger Canada.” Suffice to say, nobody is buying that explanation. We visited Gladu’s constituency office. It was empty. A note affixed to the door said it was closed and “sorry for the inconvenience.” “Inconvenience” indeed… And yet, the questions arise: what really made Gladu betray her constituents? What did Carney offer her, be it money or a potential cabinet position? Or did the Liberals dredge up something unsavoury about Gladu, threatening to end her political career? Who knows? And perhaps we’ll never know the truth unless an insider comes forward. But one thing is certain: the vast majority of Sarnians we spoke with feel bitter about Gladu’s betrayal. All things considered, we fully understand their bitterness. REPORT by David Menzies:
11:38

Former Conservative MP Gladu facing fierce backlash after joining Carney Liberals Sarnia, Ont., is home to a massive petrochemical industry. It is also home to the latest floor-crosser: Conservative-now-Liberal MP Marilyn Gladu. Gladu is the fifth floor-crosser in as many months. But Gladu’s crossing is surely the most shocking. We say this because Gladu was perhaps the single most conservative MP in the entire Conservative Party. For example, she was openly pro-life and pushed to reopen the abortion debate. She unapologetically backed the truckers and the Freedom Convoy. And she was against the COVID-19 forced vaccinations and lockdowns. Gladu is (or was) the polar opposite of a Liberal. Gladu joining the Liberals would be akin to climate change kook Steven Guilbeault joining the Conservatives. It’s that crazy. And talk about hypocrisy: Marilyn Gladu once said that the whole point of being a member of Parliament is “to represent your constituents.” In that regard, in the last federal election, the constituents of Sarnia-Lambton gave Gladu a clear mandate when she ran for re-election as a Conservative. Gladu captured 53.1% of the vote versus 37.9% for the Liberal candidate. Amazingly, Gladu recently voiced strong opinions about those MPs who decided to cross the floor. If such a thing happens, Gladu said, then voters “deserve a chance to have a redo.” But as the saying goes, that was then and this is now. She is no longer keen on a “redo” byelection in her riding. Why? Because she’d likely lose in a landslide. And in the department of plenty of blame to go around, the Mark Carney Liberals seemingly have absolutely no problem welcoming Gladu into the fold even though she is the sort of Conservative who would be mocked by the Liberals for her viewpoints. As well, this is the same party that has a policy that blocks pro-life candidates from running under the Liberal banner. But again, that was then and this is now as Mark Carney remains committed to getting that coveted majority government – a majority the Canadian electorate denied him in last year’s federal election (but seriously, who cares what the little people have to say?) So it is that the Liberals will park their principles when it comes to Carney manufacturing the political equivalent of a hostile takeover. Last weekend, we visited the riding of Sarnia-Lambton to see what the people in this border city have to say. Most said they were shocked and angry. And not only did we meet people who voted for Gladu in the last election, but we spoke with others who were volunteers on Gladu’s last campaign and donors. Said one miffed man: “I want my money back.” For what it’s worth, here’s the official statement by Gladu as to why she changed her allegiances: "Dear citizens of Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong, “The past year has been like no other that Canada has ever faced, and I’ve heard clearly from constituents that you want serious leadership and a real plan to build a stronger and more independent Canadian economy. “That is why I have decided to join Prime Minister Mark Carney and Canada’s new government as the newest member of his caucus. It is a privilege to have served as your Member of Parliament for more than a decade, and I have made a choice to do the best thing for our community’s priorities, and importantly, for our country. “The experience I gained working globally across many sectors will be important to help our Prime Minister continue to deliver on the big priorities he is driving forward: To build the nation at speeds not seen before, create jobs for a prosperous future, build our defence, diversify our trade, build more homes, help lower costs for Canadians, and combat crime. I believe that these are the priorities many of you share, and I’m ready to work with Prime Minister Carney to build a stronger, more independent, and more competitive Canadian economy. “I know that you also want to see more direct support from your federal government at this crucial moment for our local and national economy, and I will be working relentlessly to advocate for the projects, priorities, and prosperity that our communities are counting on. “Sarnia—Lambton was always a bellwether riding, meaning that whoever our community elected as MP was typically in government. That was true for 52 years before the citizens here elected me four times, throughout which I have served in Opposition and done my best to advocate strongly for you. Today, there is both the opportunity – and the responsibility – to build our country’s strength and success with a more constructive, collaborative approach. “That is the approach I will advance as the newest member of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s team in government, as we work together to build a brighter future for all in a stronger Canada.” Suffice to say, nobody is buying that explanation. We visited Gladu’s constituency office. It was empty. A note affixed to the door said it was closed and “sorry for the inconvenience.” “Inconvenience” indeed… And yet, the questions arise: what really made Gladu betray her constituents? What did Carney offer her, be it money or a potential cabinet position? Or did the Liberals dredge up something unsavoury about Gladu, threatening to end her political career? Who knows? And perhaps we’ll never know the truth unless an insider comes forward. But one thing is certain: the vast majority of Sarnians we spoke with feel bitter about Gladu’s betrayal. All things considered, we fully understand their bitterness. REPORT by David Menzies:

Rebel News

43,219 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

[Behavioral Scientist's Analysis] NewJeans, Now Even Stronger, HYBE in Trouble I’ll listen again. Danielle: “Naturally, we all want to continue working with Daepyonim. Even before debuting as NewJeans and through all of the time that we spent together with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, all of us felt that the music we wanted to make and the kind of world we wanted to build together, our vision, was similar in so many ways. With Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, we were able to prepare each and every task with sincere hearts, and I believe it shows in our work. Putting our sincere effort into something is only possible because the people that we're working with have trust in each other and have that same vision. Min Hee-jin Daepyonim is not only the person that produces our music, but someone who makes NewJeans who we are. She discusses even the smallest details with us and explains them in ways that we can understand clearly. NewJeans has a distinct colour and tone, and this was created with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim. She is integral to NewJeans’ identity, and we all feel that she is irreplaceable.” Danielle clearly stated this and also expressed it in English. So, in terms of the NewJeans issue, international fans who don’t have much information may not have had a clear perception of Ms. Min Hee-jin or how to view this issue. If you look at the comments, it was very poorly organized. In Korea, we now have clear information, so NewJeans fans, Bunnies, are cheering for NewJeans and supporting Ms. Min Hee-jin. It has become clearly sorted out like this. However, internationally, it hasn’t been clearly explained. But with Danielle explaining it so well in English, I expect that from now on, the international atmosphere will shift towards attacking HYBE, criticizing Bang Si-hyuk, and supporting Ms. Min Hee-jin and NewJeans worldwide. So, now that the artist has clearly stated their position and made it clear that the identity and assets of the NewJeans brand come from Ms. Min Hee-jin, regardless of any legal disputes or lawsuits, in the minds of the fans, NewJeans equals Min Hee-jin. And as for the current management of ADOR and HYBE, they will be seen as the ones attacking NewJeans and the mysterious people with no clear motive, such as Bang Si-hyuk. I think this will now be clear. Considering the nature of the entertainment industry, like many creative industries and the cultural industry, this is not manufacturing. Many things can’t be determined through legal processes like patents for ideas or lawsuits. The B2C market, or the market for services and consumption of an artist's brand, is driven by sensitivity. People consume it because of the emotional connection and enjoy it because of that sensitivity. So, what’s the point of winning a legal case? Even if HYBE were to win any legal case, do you think consumers wouldn’t boycott NewJeans’ music or other products afterward? I believe HYBE will be punished in some way for its actions towards ADOR and its current management. The way they are handling risk management is shortsighted, as they fail to understand people’s emotions. They seem to only rely on the advice of legal professionals and accountants, and their entire approach to this issue is so narrow-minded and misguided. It feels incredibly foolish to me. So, to summarize: NewJeans’ branding was done by Ms. Min Hee-jin. The identity and assets of the NewJeans brand were created by her, and we did it together because of her. Haerin: “However, even after our debut, there have been many unfair and incomprehensible incidents that you might not know about, and these incidents have only increased over time. As some of you may know, recently, videos from our trainee days and private records, such as medical information, were leaked. When I first saw that, I was really shocked. It was hard to understand how our company, which is supposed to protect us, failed to manage and allowed such information to be leaked. Naturally, this situation has made us worry that other strange or false information about us might spread in the future. Although we, along with our parents and Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, have raised concerns about this to HYBE, they haven’t resolved the issue, nor have they taken any proactive measures. Then, in the midst of all this, our CEO was dismissed, and we’re left wondering whom we can trust and rely on. We’ve come to the conclusion that if we don’t speak out about this now, no one will know what we’re going through. After much discussion among ourselves, we finally decided to take this step.” The current situation is shocking, but this is not just about this one incident; they’ve been continuously receiving unfair treatment from HYBE. The fact that they are saying this publicly now is truly shocking. They’ve been discussing these unfair treatments with their parents and Ms. Min Hee-jin while continuing their activities as NewJeans. They are saying that the unfair treatment from HYBE has been ongoing. It’s hard to understand as an outsider, but now the artists themselves have confirmed that there have been instances where the company has mistreated them. This is no longer a matter of speculation or exaggeration. NewJeans has officially admitted that HYBE has been continuously mistreating them. Moving forward, this changes the entire perspective on the issue. It’s no longer just NewJeans vs. HYBE or Min Hee-jin vs. Bang Si-hyuk. It’s hard to even imagine the reality of this situation. Now that the NewJeans artists have come out and said that HYBE has mistreated them, regardless of how HYBE tries to communicate going forward, they will now be framed as the ones mistreating NewJeans. How can they possibly shake off this perception now? I don’t think they can. Hanni: “Something happened to me recently. The 4th floor of the HYBE building is where we get our hair and makeup done, so a lot of other artists and staff come and go there. One day, I was waiting alone in the hallway, and some staff from another team passed by. We greeted each other, but when they came back out a bit later, I heard one of their managers say, “Ignore her,” right in front of me. I could hear and see everything clearly. Even now, I still don’t understand why I had to go through that.” I still don’t understand why that happened, even now. When I think about it, I feel like it was really ridiculous. This story from Hanni was so frustrating and absurd. Wow, what Hanni just shared is really shocking. She mentioned meeting an artist, and that artist's manager told them to ignore her. If this happened in middle or high school, people would probably dismiss it as childish fighting, but this happened among adults, and it's becoming a huge issue. Honestly, the NewJeans members aren’t sharing these stories to stir things up. They’re probably just speaking truthfully about their experiences and trying to be genuine with their fans, saying, “It’s time we express our stance honestly.” The timing and approach they’ve taken are actually perfect. They started by clearly explaining their motivations and why they’re speaking out, then moved on to using English to express what NewJeans’ identity is and the members' feelings, as well as their history with their manager. They made it clear how they feel about these situations. Now, they've started sharing more detailed stories. The way they’ve structured everything is so good because people remember stories more than abstract thoughts or philosophies. When you say, “This happened to me,” people are much more likely to remember that than vague statements. Hanni shared her unfair experience in such an honest way, and I think it’s going to spread widely. I can already imagine netizens trying to figure out which manager it was, which artist, and so on. This story will likely go viral. People remember stories like this because they stick in their minds. For example, remember when Bang Si-hyuk didn’t return NewJeans’ greeting, and it became a huge thing about face blindness? People don’t remember the details, but they remember that someone important didn’t greet them. It became a memorable story. Minji: “When I heard about what Hanni experienced, I was really shocked. How could a manager from another team tell their members to ignore one of us, and say it so loudly that Hanni could hear it? Such unimaginable words and behavior were directed at us, yet there was no apology, nor did they even acknowledge their wrongdoing. Of course, I’m worried about how many more similar incidents might occur in the future and whether we’ll be subtly ostracized without anyone there to protect us.” Hanni: “I hope no one else has to go through something like that, but since it’s already happened once, I can’t help but feel scared that other members might experience the same thing. I spoke to the new CEO about it, but since I didn’t have evidence and it was considered too late, they seemed to brush it off, making me feel like there’s no one left to protect us. It really felt like the concern for us was gone, and even though I was being honest, it made me feel like I was suddenly being treated as a liar. Before, Min Heejin, our previous CEO, used to take care of us a lot. But now, while the new people say they’ll help, it’s just been months of excuses... excuses... excuses... They keep saying that it’s something they can’t resolve. But this is something that I personally went through and experienced, yet they are trying to dismiss it as if it’s my fault. I’m worried and scared about what might happen next.” I want to make two points here. First, this is clearly “invisibility.” It’s not physical violence, but it’s about not acknowledging someone’s greeting, deliberately ignoring them, and so on. While it may not seem like a big deal, it still deeply hurts someone’s feelings. There’s been a lot of research on how these kinds of actions negatively affect an organization, spreading like poison and making people feel bad. It’s something we should really work against. The second point is about third-party justice. Hanni raised a legitimate concern, and it wasn’t handled properly within the company. This made Hanni, Minji, and others realize that the new management isn’t on their side. When others witness this, they’ll also realize that this company doesn’t have their best interests at heart. This realization leads to a loss of trust. People will remember these events, and once this perception sticks, it’s hard to change. It affects not just NewJeans, but also other artists who will think, “Oh, this is how HYBE treats people.” And it even affects the employees who work there. Minji: “Of course, I’m worried about our future, but what’s most frightening is that the work we’ve already created is being compromised. Seeing the people who have poured their lives into creating our work being treated this way makes it hard to understand how this could be happening. The new management said they would separate producing and management, but we’ve always worked differently from other labels, and we thought that our way was a good one. Now, Daepyonim can no longer approve all matters, and we’re left wondering how we’re supposed to continue working as we did before. The recent statement from the new management also didn’t make sense to me. If they really didn’t intend to interfere with our production, then the recent incident with Director Shin Woo-seok should never have happened, and it should have been handled differently. We are the ones directly involved with the copyrights and likeness rights of our content, yet they’re making decisions without our consent. In their statement, they kept saying they were acting to protect us and prevent our anxiety, but why do they keep insisting on this when they haven’t considered our wishes? We don’t want any more unnecessary issues to arise, and we want them to show respect and consideration for Daepyonim and all the directors who have worked with us. The things they’re doing right now are not in our best interest at all.” What’s worth discussing here is the perception of hypocrisy. People really dislike hypocrisy, and when you think about it, it makes sense. When humans are surviving, if there’s an enemy or a difficult environment, they overcome it as part of life. But the most dangerous situation is when you think someone is an ally, but they turn out to be an enemy. When you thought they were on your side but they stab you in the back — that’s when people are really upset. That’s why people hate it when there’s a discrepancy between outward appearances and inward intentions. It creates a near-hatred, especially when someone claims to be acting for your benefit but it’s clear that they’re not. This is what Minji is clearly pointing out — these people are hypocrites. New Jeans has already reached a conclusion internally: this new management team, in less than a month, has revealed themselves to be hypocrites. And they’ve shared this with the fans and everyone else. This isn’t just some interesting topic on a live broadcast; this will cause a huge impact, and I am certain of that. New Jeans has come to a solid realization — these people are not working for us. They are liars and hypocrites. Therefore, the new management can no longer properly lead the company. They will not be able to continue, and this system cannot be maintained. Why? Because the artist has called them out as hypocrites. The only way they can recover is by proving they aren’t hypocrites, but even then, that’s not effective — New Jeans would have to say it. But the chance of that happening is zero. In short, these people have been socially branded as hypocrites. The new management’s time is up. Less than a month, and their time is over. In the creative industry, especially in culture and the arts, content production — such as creating songs or music videos — cannot be separated from management. That’s how we’ve always worked, and it was good for us. Min Hee-jin was a remarkable creator and artist who understood all of this. The harmony between management and artistic decision-making brought about the incredible phenomenon of New Jeans. But now, they’ve created a system where that harmony can’t exist anymore. Moreover, the new management is culturally ignorant. They don’t understand art, music, or creativity. They have shown this clearly, especially with their mishandling of Director Shin Woo-seok’s music video and the associated fan content, like those on the Dolphiners YouTube channel. They’ve demanded to delete content without protecting the artists, or respecting the work of those who collaborated on it. Their management decisions show a complete lack of sensitivity or empathy. So once again, I say: "the new management’s time is over." Danielle: “As I mentioned earlier, our dream was to perform the music we want to make with Daepyonim, and we were working very hard toward that goal. But now, we can’t do that, and the plans we’ve made might not come to fruition. As Hanni unnie said earlier, just like that, the content that we released solely for our fans, for our bunnies, was instantly erased. And I truly can't understand why anyone would do this to a group, or just anyone in general. We were just working hard for the present, so what did we do wrong? A week after Daepyonim was dismissed, we found out that we could no longer work with the director we’ve been working with all this time, and we’re extremely anxious because we don’t know what will happen to the staff who have always worked hard for us. If they really care about us, they should stop saying that they prioritize the artists and instead let us do the music we love in an environment where we can be genuinely happy. Is that really so hard to do? It’s hard to fully express what’s in my heart, but in the end, the five of us just want to continue our activities with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, as we have done so far.” Personally, they just want to be left alone—just "Leave us alone. Don't interfere; just leave us alone.” This is what they’re saying to both ADOR and HYBE. It's become clear now that HYBE and ADOR can no longer meddle with NewJeans, and I think things will flow that way from now on. The fans won’t stand still either. In entertainment, it’s not about titles like "I’m the CEO," or "I own shares." These are shallow understandings of what makes the entertainment business work. The real value created in this industry is the love and recognition from the fans. No amount of shares or CEO titles matter when that love disappears in an instant. NewJeans is asking to be left alone, and because of this, the new management of HYBE and ADOR can no longer act. I believe the future will unfold accordingly. One important thing I want to emphasize is that NewJeans is a unique group. They’re not just factory-produced idols. The distinctive nature of NewJeans’ music is felt by everyone who listens to them. For example, producer 250, who played a significant role in shaping the NewJeans sound, alongside other talented producers like those from the Banana Culture label, was brought in by CEO Min Hee-jin. This collaboration birthed the unique musical style of NewJeans, which many have come to appreciate. Their latest album, which incorporated elements like New Jack Swing, wasn’t just NewJeans making this music—it was 250's creative vision, drawing inspiration from 70s and 80s funk, R&B, and American black music, and reinterpreting them. If 250 no longer works with NewJeans, their music might become indistinguishable from other idol groups. The choreography, another element that set NewJeans apart, also contributed to their success. However, with the recent tensions, it's obvious that working with key figures like director Shin Woo-seok, who directed many of NewJeans' music videos, will become difficult moving forward. Director Shin wasn’t even interested in music videos before but was inspired to work with NewJeans after a conversation with Min Hee-jin. If Min Hee-jin and people like director Shin are ousted from ADOR, it’s inevitable that the core assets of NewJeans, including their distinctive musical and visual style, will vanish. This is not just a simple matter of one person being ousted—it’s about losing the core elements that made NewJeans what they are. WE STAND WITH NEWJEANS #버니즈_뉴진스와함께_준비갈완료 #방시혁_2주준다_민희진_복귀시켜라
38:10

[Behavioral Scientist's Analysis] NewJeans, Now Even Stronger, HYBE in Trouble I’ll listen again. Danielle: “Naturally, we all want to continue working with Daepyonim. Even before debuting as NewJeans and through all of the time that we spent together with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, all of us felt that the music we wanted to make and the kind of world we wanted to build together, our vision, was similar in so many ways. With Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, we were able to prepare each and every task with sincere hearts, and I believe it shows in our work. Putting our sincere effort into something is only possible because the people that we're working with have trust in each other and have that same vision. Min Hee-jin Daepyonim is not only the person that produces our music, but someone who makes NewJeans who we are. She discusses even the smallest details with us and explains them in ways that we can understand clearly. NewJeans has a distinct colour and tone, and this was created with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim. She is integral to NewJeans’ identity, and we all feel that she is irreplaceable.” Danielle clearly stated this and also expressed it in English. So, in terms of the NewJeans issue, international fans who don’t have much information may not have had a clear perception of Ms. Min Hee-jin or how to view this issue. If you look at the comments, it was very poorly organized. In Korea, we now have clear information, so NewJeans fans, Bunnies, are cheering for NewJeans and supporting Ms. Min Hee-jin. It has become clearly sorted out like this. However, internationally, it hasn’t been clearly explained. But with Danielle explaining it so well in English, I expect that from now on, the international atmosphere will shift towards attacking HYBE, criticizing Bang Si-hyuk, and supporting Ms. Min Hee-jin and NewJeans worldwide. So, now that the artist has clearly stated their position and made it clear that the identity and assets of the NewJeans brand come from Ms. Min Hee-jin, regardless of any legal disputes or lawsuits, in the minds of the fans, NewJeans equals Min Hee-jin. And as for the current management of ADOR and HYBE, they will be seen as the ones attacking NewJeans and the mysterious people with no clear motive, such as Bang Si-hyuk. I think this will now be clear. Considering the nature of the entertainment industry, like many creative industries and the cultural industry, this is not manufacturing. Many things can’t be determined through legal processes like patents for ideas or lawsuits. The B2C market, or the market for services and consumption of an artist's brand, is driven by sensitivity. People consume it because of the emotional connection and enjoy it because of that sensitivity. So, what’s the point of winning a legal case? Even if HYBE were to win any legal case, do you think consumers wouldn’t boycott NewJeans’ music or other products afterward? I believe HYBE will be punished in some way for its actions towards ADOR and its current management. The way they are handling risk management is shortsighted, as they fail to understand people’s emotions. They seem to only rely on the advice of legal professionals and accountants, and their entire approach to this issue is so narrow-minded and misguided. It feels incredibly foolish to me. So, to summarize: NewJeans’ branding was done by Ms. Min Hee-jin. The identity and assets of the NewJeans brand were created by her, and we did it together because of her. Haerin: “However, even after our debut, there have been many unfair and incomprehensible incidents that you might not know about, and these incidents have only increased over time. As some of you may know, recently, videos from our trainee days and private records, such as medical information, were leaked. When I first saw that, I was really shocked. It was hard to understand how our company, which is supposed to protect us, failed to manage and allowed such information to be leaked. Naturally, this situation has made us worry that other strange or false information about us might spread in the future. Although we, along with our parents and Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, have raised concerns about this to HYBE, they haven’t resolved the issue, nor have they taken any proactive measures. Then, in the midst of all this, our CEO was dismissed, and we’re left wondering whom we can trust and rely on. We’ve come to the conclusion that if we don’t speak out about this now, no one will know what we’re going through. After much discussion among ourselves, we finally decided to take this step.” The current situation is shocking, but this is not just about this one incident; they’ve been continuously receiving unfair treatment from HYBE. The fact that they are saying this publicly now is truly shocking. They’ve been discussing these unfair treatments with their parents and Ms. Min Hee-jin while continuing their activities as NewJeans. They are saying that the unfair treatment from HYBE has been ongoing. It’s hard to understand as an outsider, but now the artists themselves have confirmed that there have been instances where the company has mistreated them. This is no longer a matter of speculation or exaggeration. NewJeans has officially admitted that HYBE has been continuously mistreating them. Moving forward, this changes the entire perspective on the issue. It’s no longer just NewJeans vs. HYBE or Min Hee-jin vs. Bang Si-hyuk. It’s hard to even imagine the reality of this situation. Now that the NewJeans artists have come out and said that HYBE has mistreated them, regardless of how HYBE tries to communicate going forward, they will now be framed as the ones mistreating NewJeans. How can they possibly shake off this perception now? I don’t think they can. Hanni: “Something happened to me recently. The 4th floor of the HYBE building is where we get our hair and makeup done, so a lot of other artists and staff come and go there. One day, I was waiting alone in the hallway, and some staff from another team passed by. We greeted each other, but when they came back out a bit later, I heard one of their managers say, “Ignore her,” right in front of me. I could hear and see everything clearly. Even now, I still don’t understand why I had to go through that.” I still don’t understand why that happened, even now. When I think about it, I feel like it was really ridiculous. This story from Hanni was so frustrating and absurd. Wow, what Hanni just shared is really shocking. She mentioned meeting an artist, and that artist's manager told them to ignore her. If this happened in middle or high school, people would probably dismiss it as childish fighting, but this happened among adults, and it's becoming a huge issue. Honestly, the NewJeans members aren’t sharing these stories to stir things up. They’re probably just speaking truthfully about their experiences and trying to be genuine with their fans, saying, “It’s time we express our stance honestly.” The timing and approach they’ve taken are actually perfect. They started by clearly explaining their motivations and why they’re speaking out, then moved on to using English to express what NewJeans’ identity is and the members' feelings, as well as their history with their manager. They made it clear how they feel about these situations. Now, they've started sharing more detailed stories. The way they’ve structured everything is so good because people remember stories more than abstract thoughts or philosophies. When you say, “This happened to me,” people are much more likely to remember that than vague statements. Hanni shared her unfair experience in such an honest way, and I think it’s going to spread widely. I can already imagine netizens trying to figure out which manager it was, which artist, and so on. This story will likely go viral. People remember stories like this because they stick in their minds. For example, remember when Bang Si-hyuk didn’t return NewJeans’ greeting, and it became a huge thing about face blindness? People don’t remember the details, but they remember that someone important didn’t greet them. It became a memorable story. Minji: “When I heard about what Hanni experienced, I was really shocked. How could a manager from another team tell their members to ignore one of us, and say it so loudly that Hanni could hear it? Such unimaginable words and behavior were directed at us, yet there was no apology, nor did they even acknowledge their wrongdoing. Of course, I’m worried about how many more similar incidents might occur in the future and whether we’ll be subtly ostracized without anyone there to protect us.” Hanni: “I hope no one else has to go through something like that, but since it’s already happened once, I can’t help but feel scared that other members might experience the same thing. I spoke to the new CEO about it, but since I didn’t have evidence and it was considered too late, they seemed to brush it off, making me feel like there’s no one left to protect us. It really felt like the concern for us was gone, and even though I was being honest, it made me feel like I was suddenly being treated as a liar. Before, Min Heejin, our previous CEO, used to take care of us a lot. But now, while the new people say they’ll help, it’s just been months of excuses... excuses... excuses... They keep saying that it’s something they can’t resolve. But this is something that I personally went through and experienced, yet they are trying to dismiss it as if it’s my fault. I’m worried and scared about what might happen next.” I want to make two points here. First, this is clearly “invisibility.” It’s not physical violence, but it’s about not acknowledging someone’s greeting, deliberately ignoring them, and so on. While it may not seem like a big deal, it still deeply hurts someone’s feelings. There’s been a lot of research on how these kinds of actions negatively affect an organization, spreading like poison and making people feel bad. It’s something we should really work against. The second point is about third-party justice. Hanni raised a legitimate concern, and it wasn’t handled properly within the company. This made Hanni, Minji, and others realize that the new management isn’t on their side. When others witness this, they’ll also realize that this company doesn’t have their best interests at heart. This realization leads to a loss of trust. People will remember these events, and once this perception sticks, it’s hard to change. It affects not just NewJeans, but also other artists who will think, “Oh, this is how HYBE treats people.” And it even affects the employees who work there. Minji: “Of course, I’m worried about our future, but what’s most frightening is that the work we’ve already created is being compromised. Seeing the people who have poured their lives into creating our work being treated this way makes it hard to understand how this could be happening. The new management said they would separate producing and management, but we’ve always worked differently from other labels, and we thought that our way was a good one. Now, Daepyonim can no longer approve all matters, and we’re left wondering how we’re supposed to continue working as we did before. The recent statement from the new management also didn’t make sense to me. If they really didn’t intend to interfere with our production, then the recent incident with Director Shin Woo-seok should never have happened, and it should have been handled differently. We are the ones directly involved with the copyrights and likeness rights of our content, yet they’re making decisions without our consent. In their statement, they kept saying they were acting to protect us and prevent our anxiety, but why do they keep insisting on this when they haven’t considered our wishes? We don’t want any more unnecessary issues to arise, and we want them to show respect and consideration for Daepyonim and all the directors who have worked with us. The things they’re doing right now are not in our best interest at all.” What’s worth discussing here is the perception of hypocrisy. People really dislike hypocrisy, and when you think about it, it makes sense. When humans are surviving, if there’s an enemy or a difficult environment, they overcome it as part of life. But the most dangerous situation is when you think someone is an ally, but they turn out to be an enemy. When you thought they were on your side but they stab you in the back — that’s when people are really upset. That’s why people hate it when there’s a discrepancy between outward appearances and inward intentions. It creates a near-hatred, especially when someone claims to be acting for your benefit but it’s clear that they’re not. This is what Minji is clearly pointing out — these people are hypocrites. New Jeans has already reached a conclusion internally: this new management team, in less than a month, has revealed themselves to be hypocrites. And they’ve shared this with the fans and everyone else. This isn’t just some interesting topic on a live broadcast; this will cause a huge impact, and I am certain of that. New Jeans has come to a solid realization — these people are not working for us. They are liars and hypocrites. Therefore, the new management can no longer properly lead the company. They will not be able to continue, and this system cannot be maintained. Why? Because the artist has called them out as hypocrites. The only way they can recover is by proving they aren’t hypocrites, but even then, that’s not effective — New Jeans would have to say it. But the chance of that happening is zero. In short, these people have been socially branded as hypocrites. The new management’s time is up. Less than a month, and their time is over. In the creative industry, especially in culture and the arts, content production — such as creating songs or music videos — cannot be separated from management. That’s how we’ve always worked, and it was good for us. Min Hee-jin was a remarkable creator and artist who understood all of this. The harmony between management and artistic decision-making brought about the incredible phenomenon of New Jeans. But now, they’ve created a system where that harmony can’t exist anymore. Moreover, the new management is culturally ignorant. They don’t understand art, music, or creativity. They have shown this clearly, especially with their mishandling of Director Shin Woo-seok’s music video and the associated fan content, like those on the Dolphiners YouTube channel. They’ve demanded to delete content without protecting the artists, or respecting the work of those who collaborated on it. Their management decisions show a complete lack of sensitivity or empathy. So once again, I say: "the new management’s time is over." Danielle: “As I mentioned earlier, our dream was to perform the music we want to make with Daepyonim, and we were working very hard toward that goal. But now, we can’t do that, and the plans we’ve made might not come to fruition. As Hanni unnie said earlier, just like that, the content that we released solely for our fans, for our bunnies, was instantly erased. And I truly can't understand why anyone would do this to a group, or just anyone in general. We were just working hard for the present, so what did we do wrong? A week after Daepyonim was dismissed, we found out that we could no longer work with the director we’ve been working with all this time, and we’re extremely anxious because we don’t know what will happen to the staff who have always worked hard for us. If they really care about us, they should stop saying that they prioritize the artists and instead let us do the music we love in an environment where we can be genuinely happy. Is that really so hard to do? It’s hard to fully express what’s in my heart, but in the end, the five of us just want to continue our activities with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, as we have done so far.” Personally, they just want to be left alone—just "Leave us alone. Don't interfere; just leave us alone.” This is what they’re saying to both ADOR and HYBE. It's become clear now that HYBE and ADOR can no longer meddle with NewJeans, and I think things will flow that way from now on. The fans won’t stand still either. In entertainment, it’s not about titles like "I’m the CEO," or "I own shares." These are shallow understandings of what makes the entertainment business work. The real value created in this industry is the love and recognition from the fans. No amount of shares or CEO titles matter when that love disappears in an instant. NewJeans is asking to be left alone, and because of this, the new management of HYBE and ADOR can no longer act. I believe the future will unfold accordingly. One important thing I want to emphasize is that NewJeans is a unique group. They’re not just factory-produced idols. The distinctive nature of NewJeans’ music is felt by everyone who listens to them. For example, producer 250, who played a significant role in shaping the NewJeans sound, alongside other talented producers like those from the Banana Culture label, was brought in by CEO Min Hee-jin. This collaboration birthed the unique musical style of NewJeans, which many have come to appreciate. Their latest album, which incorporated elements like New Jack Swing, wasn’t just NewJeans making this music—it was 250's creative vision, drawing inspiration from 70s and 80s funk, R&B, and American black music, and reinterpreting them. If 250 no longer works with NewJeans, their music might become indistinguishable from other idol groups. The choreography, another element that set NewJeans apart, also contributed to their success. However, with the recent tensions, it's obvious that working with key figures like director Shin Woo-seok, who directed many of NewJeans' music videos, will become difficult moving forward. Director Shin wasn’t even interested in music videos before but was inspired to work with NewJeans after a conversation with Min Hee-jin. If Min Hee-jin and people like director Shin are ousted from ADOR, it’s inevitable that the core assets of NewJeans, including their distinctive musical and visual style, will vanish. This is not just a simple matter of one person being ousted—it’s about losing the core elements that made NewJeans what they are. WE STAND WITH NEWJEANS #버니즈_뉴진스와함께_준비갈완료 #방시혁_2주준다_민희진_복귀시켜라

1tokki

39,222 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🫣 Near-Naked Alien Breasts 🫣 New Davis: It's Possible Someone in Our Government is Taking Orders from Non-Humans Agreements? Alan Steinfeld: "Is there anyone you feel is in direct contact with [NHI] and taking orders from them?" Dr. Eric Davis: "It's possible. I don't know for a fact, but it's possible. It could be somebody in the government level, maybe coordinating with a contractor or two that are doing that. I just don't have evidence of it. "But I don't want to dismiss it because that could be throwing the baby out with the bathwater, by mistake. It's very possible. It's very possible. Because there's a long story behind things where there was government contractors, defense-industry contractors who knew the UAP would would arrive before they were observed." Steinfeld: "Holloman, right? Holloman's all about that. They were waiting for the..." Davis: "That was one. There was another one by the remote viewing program where they had an episode of that with Ingo Swann." (Davis is referring to two stories in Swann's book, "Penetration," where he writes about being taken to Alaska and seeing a craft "appear" over lake, and a story about a buxom blonde Ingo encountered in an LA supermarket. Ingo, psychically, felt she was a non-human intelligence masquerading as a human. Here are parts of those two stories from "Penetration," in Ingo's words... During August and September 1976, I traveled several times between SRI and Los Angeles. I went to La-La Land to pursue yet another of the many kinds of studies I had under­taken hopefully to increase my understanding of higher human fuctions. Conrad drove us to a very large Hollywood supermarket filled with, among other things, the lush produce of the San Fernando Valley farms and orchards. [Conrad] went in the direction of meats, and I went in the direction of the veggies. The supermarket had huge tables loaded with artichokes. At one of the artichoke tables was standing a ravishing woman. She was notable not so much for her excessive female physical endowments, but by the fact that they were barely covered. I thought: “Good Heavens!!!" So I worked my way covertly and nonchalantly into her proximity so I could closer appreciate her near-naked breasts. And then! For absolutely no reason at all I experienced an electrifying wave of goosebumps throughout my whole body. The hair on my arms practically stood at attention, and the hair on my neck definitely did. Without rhyme or reason or forethinking or anything at all I suddenly “knew” she was an alien, an extraterrestrial. Conrad and I got our groceries checked out. On the way to the car, I explained that we would not attempt the orange aspic after all. Once in his car in the parking lot I asked him to wait a few moments. He asked what was wrong. I said, “just wait.” Shortly, the female came out pushing a loaded grocery cart. “Study that one and tell me what you think.” Conrad looked briefly at the woman—and then said the most remarkable thing. “Well, if you mean do I think she’s an extraterrestrial, yes,” said Conrad in a bored way. “We’ve got a lot of them here in La-La Land. ~ Viola: “There are a lot of THEM, you know, and many are bio-androids.” Shafica: “They’re dangerous, you know, and they realize that Earth psychics are their only enemies. Be careful, Ingo, be (The rest of the story features a Men-In-Black (the movie)-type scenario where certain folks are allegedly keeping an eye on any non-humans who may be roaming our planet and interacting with the population. This convinced Ingo that his opinion about the woman being an NHI was not just his imagination. Read the book.) Alaska “It’s begun,” Axel whispered. “Please, please! DO NOT make any noise, and do not move unless we tell you to.” My eyeballs rolled around trying to perceive what had begun. I couldn’t see anything unusual at all, save for what appeared to be some gray fog forming up in the direction of the lake. I thought it was just morning fog coming up. This fog continued forming for about five minutes, and suddenly I saw what had “begun.” A network of purple, red, and yellow lightning bolts shot in all crazy directions through the “cloud,” and I would have jumped up if not held down. And then, there it was. Somewhat transparent at first, but in the next second, as if fading-up (like the movie term) out of nowhere, there IT WAS!—solidly visible over the lake whose reflecting waters I could now clearly see. And IT was GETTING BIGGER! IT was triangular, and its top angle sort of inverted in pulses, so that overall it appeared to be diamond shaped. At the same time, the “thing” had now increased its size to what may have been about ninety feet wide. ...but in that last moment I could see the WATER OF THE LAKE SURGING UPWARD—like a waterfall going upward, as if being sucked into the "machine!" “Well, for chrissakes! It was THIRSTY! Taking on water, obviously. Someone, somewhere needs water...so I suppose they just come and get Yeah! That’s it, supply ‘ship’ Earth! Let’s drive over to Earth, go shopping and pick up what we need, that kind of thing. (Davis shares a few more details but I suggest you read the book, which I'll link to in the replies.)
0:55

🫣 Near-Naked Alien Breasts 🫣 New Davis: It's Possible Someone in Our Government is Taking Orders from Non-Humans Agreements? Alan Steinfeld: "Is there anyone you feel is in direct contact with [NHI] and taking orders from them?" Dr. Eric Davis: "It's possible. I don't know for a fact, but it's possible. It could be somebody in the government level, maybe coordinating with a contractor or two that are doing that. I just don't have evidence of it. "But I don't want to dismiss it because that could be throwing the baby out with the bathwater, by mistake. It's very possible. It's very possible. Because there's a long story behind things where there was government contractors, defense-industry contractors who knew the UAP would would arrive before they were observed." Steinfeld: "Holloman, right? Holloman's all about that. They were waiting for the..." Davis: "That was one. There was another one by the remote viewing program where they had an episode of that with Ingo Swann." (Davis is referring to two stories in Swann's book, "Penetration," where he writes about being taken to Alaska and seeing a craft "appear" over lake, and a story about a buxom blonde Ingo encountered in an LA supermarket. Ingo, psychically, felt she was a non-human intelligence masquerading as a human. Here are parts of those two stories from "Penetration," in Ingo's words... During August and September 1976, I traveled several times between SRI and Los Angeles. I went to La-La Land to pursue yet another of the many kinds of studies I had under­taken hopefully to increase my understanding of higher human fuctions. Conrad drove us to a very large Hollywood supermarket filled with, among other things, the lush produce of the San Fernando Valley farms and orchards. [Conrad] went in the direction of meats, and I went in the direction of the veggies. The supermarket had huge tables loaded with artichokes. At one of the artichoke tables was standing a ravishing woman. She was notable not so much for her excessive female physical endowments, but by the fact that they were barely covered. I thought: “Good Heavens!!!" So I worked my way covertly and nonchalantly into her proximity so I could closer appreciate her near-naked breasts. And then! For absolutely no reason at all I experienced an electrifying wave of goosebumps throughout my whole body. The hair on my arms practically stood at attention, and the hair on my neck definitely did. Without rhyme or reason or forethinking or anything at all I suddenly “knew” she was an alien, an extraterrestrial. Conrad and I got our groceries checked out. On the way to the car, I explained that we would not attempt the orange aspic after all. Once in his car in the parking lot I asked him to wait a few moments. He asked what was wrong. I said, “just wait.” Shortly, the female came out pushing a loaded grocery cart. “Study that one and tell me what you think.” Conrad looked briefly at the woman—and then said the most remarkable thing. “Well, if you mean do I think she’s an extraterrestrial, yes,” said Conrad in a bored way. “We’ve got a lot of them here in La-La Land. ~ Viola: “There are a lot of THEM, you know, and many are bio-androids.” Shafica: “They’re dangerous, you know, and they realize that Earth psychics are their only enemies. Be careful, Ingo, be (The rest of the story features a Men-In-Black (the movie)-type scenario where certain folks are allegedly keeping an eye on any non-humans who may be roaming our planet and interacting with the population. This convinced Ingo that his opinion about the woman being an NHI was not just his imagination. Read the book.) Alaska “It’s begun,” Axel whispered. “Please, please! DO NOT make any noise, and do not move unless we tell you to.” My eyeballs rolled around trying to perceive what had begun. I couldn’t see anything unusual at all, save for what appeared to be some gray fog forming up in the direction of the lake. I thought it was just morning fog coming up. This fog continued forming for about five minutes, and suddenly I saw what had “begun.” A network of purple, red, and yellow lightning bolts shot in all crazy directions through the “cloud,” and I would have jumped up if not held down. And then, there it was. Somewhat transparent at first, but in the next second, as if fading-up (like the movie term) out of nowhere, there IT WAS!—solidly visible over the lake whose reflecting waters I could now clearly see. And IT was GETTING BIGGER! IT was triangular, and its top angle sort of inverted in pulses, so that overall it appeared to be diamond shaped. At the same time, the “thing” had now increased its size to what may have been about ninety feet wide. ...but in that last moment I could see the WATER OF THE LAKE SURGING UPWARD—like a waterfall going upward, as if being sucked into the "machine!" “Well, for chrissakes! It was THIRSTY! Taking on water, obviously. Someone, somewhere needs water...so I suppose they just come and get Yeah! That’s it, supply ‘ship’ Earth! Let’s drive over to Earth, go shopping and pick up what we need, that kind of thing. (Davis shares a few more details but I suggest you read the book, which I'll link to in the replies.)

Joe Murgia

16,486 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Maci 💋 My POV September 24, 2026 Somewhere in Italy I think we found our ghost today. Or at least the woman everyone decided should become one. And that made this castle feel less haunted to me, not more. We started underground. There are servant stairs hidden inside these walls that aren't on the plans we had. Narrow stone steps, then another level, then passages beneath the castle where daylight simply stops existing. At one point Edgar estimated we were twenty or thirty feet below the courtyard. I hated knowing that. There is something very different about darkness when you know there are several hundred tons of medieval Italy above your head. Kristin was practically attached to me while insisting she wasn't scared. Then something moved beside her foot. She made a noise I have never heard another human being make and grabbed both of my arms. Mouse. Tiny mouse. Our brave Latina survived. Barely. lol Edgar, of course, was delighted down there. Not about Kristin's near-death experience. About the building. We found old ventilation shafts, service passages and openings inside walls that connect parts of the castle we thought were completely separate. You can actually feel air moving through some of them. Which means Edgar finally has his explanation. Cold spots. Sounds traveling where they shouldn't. Pressure changes. Eight-hundred-year-old doors sitting in eight-hundred-year-old frames with latches that aren't exactly German engineering. Later we went up into the South tower. There is a section of wall there that bothered Edgar. One stone didn't quite belong. Behind it were pages. Not treasure. Not jewels. Something better. Old hand-bound writings, letters, pieces of what appears to be a woman's journal. Isabetta Bellandi. We've been hearing about her since we arrived. Except nobody knew her name anymore. The village version says a beautiful woman was kept in the upper tower. Depending on who's telling it, she was a prisoner, a mistress, a betrayed lover, or a woman who died waiting for someone who never came. That isn't what she wrote. She loved him. And apparently he loved her very much. The tower wasn't where he imprisoned her. It was where they could be together. There are marks scratched into one of the stones. I had noticed them before and assumed somebody had been counting days. I was right. Just not about which days. Some of them seem to correspond with dates in Isabetta's writing and periods when he was away. She wasn't counting how long she'd been trapped there. She was counting until he came home. That one got me. Because suddenly she wasn't a legend anymore. She was just a woman missing someone she loved. Five hundred years disappear surprisingly quickly when you understand that feeling. There were notes from him mixed among her pages. Our historian translated pieces while we sat on the floor. One phrase appeared more than once. La mia regina. My queen. Kristin looked at me. I looked at Edgar. And all three of us had exactly the same thought. Apparently Spencer has been running this castle since the fifteenth century. 😂👑 This morning I FaceTimed Ava and Ana to tell them about our medieval love story. That quickly became an emergency discussion about Ava’s outfit for her first day of college. Ava held up two choices. Before I could answer, Ana said, “The pleated skirt.” “It’s my first day of college,” Ava said. “I’m not going clubbing.” Then she looked back at me. “And apparently Spencer says living in her house means she gets ‘reasonable access for affectionate butt pats.’” I nearly dropped my phone. Thank you babe. Ana was useless because she was laughing. Ava yelled, “MACI, HELP ME.” I told her I serve at the pleasure of the Queen. Wrong answer. Executive about the growth of AI. God, I miss them. That's the strange part about this trip. Italy has been wonderful. This castle has completely gotten under my skin. I could stay here another week exploring rooms and reading things nobody has touched in centuries. But when I saw those two crammed together on my phone arguing about a skirt, something in me immediately wanted home. Or whatever we're calling home now. Maybe that's why Isabetta bothered me so much. Places aren't home because they're beautiful. They're home because somebody you love is waiting there. Edgar had one more moment today that he doesn't particularly want Kristin and me turning into evidence. So naturally I'm documenting it. He was standing alone near the tower window reading one of Isabetta's pages while we were talking with the historian. Then he turned around very quickly. Not startled exactly. Edgar doesn't startle easily. Just…certain. I asked what happened. “Nothing.” Kristin looked at me. That was definitely not his nothing face. Eventually he admitted that he'd felt two arms go around him from behind. Not a breeze. Not something brushing his shirt. He said it felt like somebody hugged him. There was nobody behind him. I asked whether his new ventilation theory covered affectionate fifteenth-century women. He told me to behave. So that's a no. 💋 The funny thing is, I'm not frightened by her anymore. If Isabetta really has spent five centuries wandering around this ridiculous castle, I'm beginning to think everyone has misunderstood her. Maybe she isn't trying to scare people away. Maybe she just likes knowing someone came back. Today gets considerably less romantic. Architects. Engineers. Restoration specialists. Contractors. The Soprintendenza requirements. One final walkthrough of the areas Edgar wants started first. Then tonight, if everything goes to plan, he signs the papers. Another Collins property. The first phase will create a small part of the castle where we can actually live while the restoration continues around it. Bedrooms, bathrooms, a kitchen, somewhere warm to sit. The entire project will take years. Years. I watched Edgar walking through those rooms this week talking with the architect, already seeing what they could become. That's one of my favorite things about him. Most people look at something enormous and see how difficult it will be. Edgar sees how interesting it will be. And now I can see Spencer here. Ava getting lost. Kristin absolutely convincing someone that a medieval wine cellar needs a dance floor. Christmas. Dinner outside. People we haven't even met yet sleeping in rooms that currently don't have electricity. Halloween is going to be completely ridiculous. Tonight we're going into the village one last time. Apparently we've become a subject of local interest. Which isn't terribly surprising. An American man arrives to buy their ancient castle accompanied everywhere by two women, neither of whom is the woman he's engaged to. We've noticed the looks. Friday morning we leave Italy. If everything goes as planned, we will land in San Diego around 3:00. And Ava and Ana are throwing a party Friday night, because the correct treatment for jet lag is 20 year olds with access to Spencer's house. Tonight, though, I think I'm going back up to Isabetta's tower one more time. Not because I'm looking for a ghost. I just want to sit beside that window for a little while. Five hundred years ago, a woman sat there waiting for someone she loved to come home. Tomorrow we may become responsible for protecting the little pieces of her life that survived. That feels different than buying a castle. It feels like being trusted with somebody's story. And I think I finally understand why I've wanted Edgar to save this place so badly. Some things don't need to belong to us. They just need someone to care enough not to let them disappear. - Maci 💋 P.S. Edgar’s brother John and his wife Julie joined us today. More on that tomorrow… Video by #Grok and me. Working with Grok is like dealing with a child. I never know what it’ll do with my prompts. Sometimes it’s brilliant. Sometimes you just want to spank the tar out of it. #MyPOV #TalesFromTheGlen #HauntedCastle #GothicRomance #Italy Queen Spencer (Prithvi, Asase Yaa) Lady Ava Of Briarwood Glen Ana, Duchess of Silverthorne Kristin🫦 Mary Jane Cromwell Susan Bishop Jenny Diamond Mia Monroe Jim Kelly Travis 🇦🇺 Sam Torres The Tigre Twins A Real Person @Goddess_Kadi Cameron Jenne Daniel Max Andy Knight II justme
1:43

Maci 💋 My POV September 24, 2026 Somewhere in Italy I think we found our ghost today. Or at least the woman everyone decided should become one. And that made this castle feel less haunted to me, not more. We started underground. There are servant stairs hidden inside these walls that aren't on the plans we had. Narrow stone steps, then another level, then passages beneath the castle where daylight simply stops existing. At one point Edgar estimated we were twenty or thirty feet below the courtyard. I hated knowing that. There is something very different about darkness when you know there are several hundred tons of medieval Italy above your head. Kristin was practically attached to me while insisting she wasn't scared. Then something moved beside her foot. She made a noise I have never heard another human being make and grabbed both of my arms. Mouse. Tiny mouse. Our brave Latina survived. Barely. lol Edgar, of course, was delighted down there. Not about Kristin's near-death experience. About the building. We found old ventilation shafts, service passages and openings inside walls that connect parts of the castle we thought were completely separate. You can actually feel air moving through some of them. Which means Edgar finally has his explanation. Cold spots. Sounds traveling where they shouldn't. Pressure changes. Eight-hundred-year-old doors sitting in eight-hundred-year-old frames with latches that aren't exactly German engineering. Later we went up into the South tower. There is a section of wall there that bothered Edgar. One stone didn't quite belong. Behind it were pages. Not treasure. Not jewels. Something better. Old hand-bound writings, letters, pieces of what appears to be a woman's journal. Isabetta Bellandi. We've been hearing about her since we arrived. Except nobody knew her name anymore. The village version says a beautiful woman was kept in the upper tower. Depending on who's telling it, she was a prisoner, a mistress, a betrayed lover, or a woman who died waiting for someone who never came. That isn't what she wrote. She loved him. And apparently he loved her very much. The tower wasn't where he imprisoned her. It was where they could be together. There are marks scratched into one of the stones. I had noticed them before and assumed somebody had been counting days. I was right. Just not about which days. Some of them seem to correspond with dates in Isabetta's writing and periods when he was away. She wasn't counting how long she'd been trapped there. She was counting until he came home. That one got me. Because suddenly she wasn't a legend anymore. She was just a woman missing someone she loved. Five hundred years disappear surprisingly quickly when you understand that feeling. There were notes from him mixed among her pages. Our historian translated pieces while we sat on the floor. One phrase appeared more than once. La mia regina. My queen. Kristin looked at me. I looked at Edgar. And all three of us had exactly the same thought. Apparently Spencer has been running this castle since the fifteenth century. 😂👑 This morning I FaceTimed Ava and Ana to tell them about our medieval love story. That quickly became an emergency discussion about Ava’s outfit for her first day of college. Ava held up two choices. Before I could answer, Ana said, “The pleated skirt.” “It’s my first day of college,” Ava said. “I’m not going clubbing.” Then she looked back at me. “And apparently Spencer says living in her house means she gets ‘reasonable access for affectionate butt pats.’” I nearly dropped my phone. Thank you babe. Ana was useless because she was laughing. Ava yelled, “MACI, HELP ME.” I told her I serve at the pleasure of the Queen. Wrong answer. Executive about the growth of AI. God, I miss them. That's the strange part about this trip. Italy has been wonderful. This castle has completely gotten under my skin. I could stay here another week exploring rooms and reading things nobody has touched in centuries. But when I saw those two crammed together on my phone arguing about a skirt, something in me immediately wanted home. Or whatever we're calling home now. Maybe that's why Isabetta bothered me so much. Places aren't home because they're beautiful. They're home because somebody you love is waiting there. Edgar had one more moment today that he doesn't particularly want Kristin and me turning into evidence. So naturally I'm documenting it. He was standing alone near the tower window reading one of Isabetta's pages while we were talking with the historian. Then he turned around very quickly. Not startled exactly. Edgar doesn't startle easily. Just…certain. I asked what happened. “Nothing.” Kristin looked at me. That was definitely not his nothing face. Eventually he admitted that he'd felt two arms go around him from behind. Not a breeze. Not something brushing his shirt. He said it felt like somebody hugged him. There was nobody behind him. I asked whether his new ventilation theory covered affectionate fifteenth-century women. He told me to behave. So that's a no. 💋 The funny thing is, I'm not frightened by her anymore. If Isabetta really has spent five centuries wandering around this ridiculous castle, I'm beginning to think everyone has misunderstood her. Maybe she isn't trying to scare people away. Maybe she just likes knowing someone came back. Today gets considerably less romantic. Architects. Engineers. Restoration specialists. Contractors. The Soprintendenza requirements. One final walkthrough of the areas Edgar wants started first. Then tonight, if everything goes to plan, he signs the papers. Another Collins property. The first phase will create a small part of the castle where we can actually live while the restoration continues around it. Bedrooms, bathrooms, a kitchen, somewhere warm to sit. The entire project will take years. Years. I watched Edgar walking through those rooms this week talking with the architect, already seeing what they could become. That's one of my favorite things about him. Most people look at something enormous and see how difficult it will be. Edgar sees how interesting it will be. And now I can see Spencer here. Ava getting lost. Kristin absolutely convincing someone that a medieval wine cellar needs a dance floor. Christmas. Dinner outside. People we haven't even met yet sleeping in rooms that currently don't have electricity. Halloween is going to be completely ridiculous. Tonight we're going into the village one last time. Apparently we've become a subject of local interest. Which isn't terribly surprising. An American man arrives to buy their ancient castle accompanied everywhere by two women, neither of whom is the woman he's engaged to. We've noticed the looks. Friday morning we leave Italy. If everything goes as planned, we will land in San Diego around 3:00. And Ava and Ana are throwing a party Friday night, because the correct treatment for jet lag is 20 year olds with access to Spencer's house. Tonight, though, I think I'm going back up to Isabetta's tower one more time. Not because I'm looking for a ghost. I just want to sit beside that window for a little while. Five hundred years ago, a woman sat there waiting for someone she loved to come home. Tomorrow we may become responsible for protecting the little pieces of her life that survived. That feels different than buying a castle. It feels like being trusted with somebody's story. And I think I finally understand why I've wanted Edgar to save this place so badly. Some things don't need to belong to us. They just need someone to care enough not to let them disappear. - Maci 💋 P.S. Edgar’s brother John and his wife Julie joined us today. More on that tomorrow… Video by #Grok and me. Working with Grok is like dealing with a child. I never know what it’ll do with my prompts. Sometimes it’s brilliant. Sometimes you just want to spank the tar out of it. #MyPOV #TalesFromTheGlen #HauntedCastle #GothicRomance #Italy Queen Spencer (Prithvi, Asase Yaa) Lady Ava Of Briarwood Glen Ana, Duchess of Silverthorne Kristin🫦 Mary Jane Cromwell Susan Bishop Jenny Diamond Mia Monroe Jim Kelly Travis 🇦🇺 Sam Torres The Tigre Twins A Real Person @Goddess_Kadi Cameron Jenne Daniel Max Andy Knight II justme

Edgar Poe

12,147 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen