正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 This Wasn’t a Random Protester — It Was a NIAC Communications Manager This appears to be just a concerned Iranian American speaking from the heart, but it’s not an organic moment. It’s Isabella (Bella) Javidan, the Communications Manager for the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), speaking at a... protest here in the United States. NIAC is a policy advocacy organization. It has faced sustained criticism from opponents who argue it pushes positions aligned with Tehran’s interests, and in January 2020 several U.S. senators urged DOJ to review NIAC/NIAC Action for potential FARA concerns. NIAC has denied those accusations. Even the “VPN” line is telling. In Iran, major apps and platforms are routinely restricted, and people often need VPNs to access the open internet or even get messages through when connectivity is throttled. So when she moves from “I can’t reach my family” to claiming the “only logical reason” for the war is Israeli “expansionism” and invoking “Greater Israel,” you’re hearing a comms professional doing what her job is: advancing a message.show more

Stu Smith

41,944 subscribers

156,289 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨This is a call to action for all Iranians: Tag Massachusetts Peace Action (MAPA) and let them know that NIAC is not your voice and does not represent you. I start: I was born and raised in Iran. I left only seven years ago. I am saying this clearly: NIAC does not represent me. NIAC is not my voice. This is a video directly from Iran. Even people inside Iran despise NIAC. The writing says: “NIAC does not represent the people of Iran.” #IranMassacre #IranRevoIution2026

🚨This is a call to action for all Iranians: Tag Massachusetts Peace Action (MAPA) and let them know that NIAC is not your voice and does not represent you. I start: I was born and raised in Iran. I left only seven years ago. I am saying this clearly: NIAC does not represent me. NIAC is not my voice. This is a video directly from Iran. Even people inside Iran despise NIAC. The writing says: “NIAC does not represent the people of Iran.” #IranMassacre #IranRevoIution2026

Sana Ebrahimi Ledene

81,722 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 NIAC Comms Manager Pushes One-Sided Narrative on Iran War In this clip, NIAC Communications Manager Isabella (Bella) Javidan describes strikes inside Iran and frames them as one-sided “carpet bombing” of civilians. Civilian casualties and damage in Iran are real and tragic. Some incidents, including a deadly strike on a girls’ school, are under investigation by international bodies. But the speech leaves out a major piece of the picture. Since the conflict escalated, Iran has launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks across the region, striking targets in Gulf states including the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, and Saudi Arabia, as well as U.S. facilities and embassies in the region. In some cases those strikes have hit civilian infrastructure, ports, residential buildings, and energy facilities, prompting condemnation from multiple Arab governments. None of that appears in this speech. Instead, the narrative moves quickly from tragic imagery to a political message about “empire,” U.S. spending, and the illegitimacy of the war. That framing matters because this isn’t a random protester speaking emotionally in the moment. It’s a communications professional for an advocacy organization that has faced years of allegations and formal calls for a DOJ FARA review, delivering a highly selective narrative about the conflict.

🚨 NIAC Comms Manager Pushes One-Sided Narrative on Iran War In this clip, NIAC Communications Manager Isabella (Bella) Javidan describes strikes inside Iran and frames them as one-sided “carpet bombing” of civilians. Civilian casualties and damage in Iran are real and tragic. Some incidents, including a deadly strike on a girls’ school, are under investigation by international bodies. But the speech leaves out a major piece of the picture. Since the conflict escalated, Iran has launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks across the region, striking targets in Gulf states including the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, and Saudi Arabia, as well as U.S. facilities and embassies in the region. In some cases those strikes have hit civilian infrastructure, ports, residential buildings, and energy facilities, prompting condemnation from multiple Arab governments. None of that appears in this speech. Instead, the narrative moves quickly from tragic imagery to a political message about “empire,” U.S. spending, and the illegitimacy of the war. That framing matters because this isn’t a random protester speaking emotionally in the moment. It’s a communications professional for an advocacy organization that has faced years of allegations and formal calls for a DOJ FARA review, delivering a highly selective narrative about the conflict.

Stu Smith

20,943 次观看 • 4 个月前

NEW: 🚨 Iran Attempts Coup Against SECWAR Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth In USA Via Iranian Communist Congresswoman 🚨 Is an Iranian Democrat US Congresswoman in Arizona a foreign agent working for the Iranian Islamic regime? NIAC NIAC endorsed Iranian American Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari filed articles of impeachment against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth last week. NIAC NIAC has promoted lifting sanctions on Iran, they support a nuclear Iran, and many people have accused NIAC of lobbying for and promoting the interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran’s own state media has called NIAC the Iranian regime’s lobbying organization in the United States. See the video below 👇🏻 Notice how the Iranian officials in the video say “be careful, this is being recorded” when someone by on the panel suggests the Iranian regime is working with Trita Parsi for lobby efforts. The Islamic Iranian regime has also allegedly posted flyers of NIAC co-founder and first President of NIAC Trita Parsi Trita Parsi all over Iran during the current war with the US. See photos below 👇🏻 Ansari’s attempt to remove Hegseth as the US Secretary of War Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is designed to weaken America’s military at the behest of Iran and the IRGC. She should be investigated for possibly violations of material support to terrorism and possible espionage. This is why we should not allow Muslims and individuals who pretend to not be Muslim while they were born in Muslim countries and lived a Muslim life growing up to serve in elected office in America. They will NEVER be America First. They will ALWAYS protect the interests of Muslims and Islamic terrorists before our country, the United States of America. The FBI needs to investigate Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari and Trita Parsi. Keep an eye on their bank accounts for suspicious activity. As I previously reported, Trita Parsi Trita Parsi is also a Green Card holder. He holds citizenship in Iran and Sweden. Trita Parsi is a mouthpiece for the Iranian Regime and has used NIAC NIAC and the Quincy Institute Quincy Institute to push out pro-Iranian regime talking points. He should be deported next. Sources tell me Trita’s green card is allegedly being looked at by DHS. Trita Parsi is truly a threat to US National Security. Secretary Marco Rubio Homeland Security U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement RECEIPTS 👇🏻

NEW: 🚨 Iran Attempts Coup Against SECWAR Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth In USA Via Iranian Communist Congresswoman 🚨 Is an Iranian Democrat US Congresswoman in Arizona a foreign agent working for the Iranian Islamic regime? NIAC NIAC endorsed Iranian American Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari filed articles of impeachment against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth last week. NIAC NIAC has promoted lifting sanctions on Iran, they support a nuclear Iran, and many people have accused NIAC of lobbying for and promoting the interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran’s own state media has called NIAC the Iranian regime’s lobbying organization in the United States. See the video below 👇🏻 Notice how the Iranian officials in the video say “be careful, this is being recorded” when someone by on the panel suggests the Iranian regime is working with Trita Parsi for lobby efforts. The Islamic Iranian regime has also allegedly posted flyers of NIAC co-founder and first President of NIAC Trita Parsi Trita Parsi all over Iran during the current war with the US. See photos below 👇🏻 Ansari’s attempt to remove Hegseth as the US Secretary of War Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is designed to weaken America’s military at the behest of Iran and the IRGC. She should be investigated for possibly violations of material support to terrorism and possible espionage. This is why we should not allow Muslims and individuals who pretend to not be Muslim while they were born in Muslim countries and lived a Muslim life growing up to serve in elected office in America. They will NEVER be America First. They will ALWAYS protect the interests of Muslims and Islamic terrorists before our country, the United States of America. The FBI needs to investigate Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari and Trita Parsi. Keep an eye on their bank accounts for suspicious activity. As I previously reported, Trita Parsi Trita Parsi is also a Green Card holder. He holds citizenship in Iran and Sweden. Trita Parsi is a mouthpiece for the Iranian Regime and has used NIAC NIAC and the Quincy Institute Quincy Institute to push out pro-Iranian regime talking points. He should be deported next. Sources tell me Trita’s green card is allegedly being looked at by DHS. Trita Parsi is truly a threat to US National Security. Secretary Marco Rubio Homeland Security U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement RECEIPTS 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

1,550,392 次观看 • 2 个月前

AAIRIA Demands Federal Investigation into NIAC, Trita Parsi, and the Quincy Institute The Alliance Against Islamic Regime of Iran Apologists (AAIRIA) calls on the U.S. Department of Justice, the FARA Unit, and relevant Congressional oversight committees to immediately open an investigation into the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), Trita Parsi, and the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft regarding their foreign affiliations, funding streams, and unregistered lobbying activities potentially on behalf of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This is no longer a matter of political disagreement; it is a matter of national transparency and security. In a recent televised political roundtable broadcast on IRIB, the Islamic Republic’s own media platform, high-profile regime insiders, including Foad Izadi, a hardline figure aligned with Saeed Jalili, openly discussed NIAC and Trita Parsi as components of a failed Iranian lobbying project in the United States. Their admissions are direct and damning: "You went and set up NIAC over there, and it ruined the dignity and honor of Iran and Iranians... It all fell apart, and the JCPOA failed." "The Arabs lobby directly through people like Kushner. The Israelis have formal institutions like AIPAC. But Iran can’t do that, so they built NIAC instead." These are not accusations from dissidents or exiled critics; they are the regime’s own post-mortem analysis of its failed foreign influence operation. Their discussion explicitly names NIAC as a project initiated under Hassan Rouhani, with Trita Parsi as its figurehead, meant to operate through proxy narratives, deniability, and blurred affiliations. This tactic, they now admit, collapsed because Iran’s opaque methods could not withstand the scrutiny of an open society. NIAC has never registered under FARA, despite years of policy influence in Washington, access to media platforms, closed-door congressional briefings, and international advocacy directly affecting U.S.–Iran relations. The same must be asked of Trita Parsi’s current role at the Quincy Institute, which continues to platform NIAC alumni and propagate talking points that mirror the regime’s strategic narratives, particularly in deflecting attention from human rights abuses and externalizing blame onto U.S. policy. Regime loyalists have now admitted on record that NIAC was designed as an influence operation. It is time U.S. institutions stop pretending otherwise. We demand: - A full investigation by the Department of Justice’s FARA Unit into NIAC, Trita Parsi, and Quincy Institute activities and funding. - Public hearings by Congressional intelligence and judiciary committees on foreign influence operations and soft power campaigns by the Islamic Republic. - A review by media ethics boards and journalistic institutions of outlets that continue to platform NIAC operatives as neutral experts, despite growing evidence to the contrary. For years, Iranian activists, victims’ families, and civil society leaders have warned that organizations like NIAC do not represent the Iranian American community, but instead act as gatekeepers and deflectors on behalf of a violent, authoritarian regime. Now, the regime has confirmed it themselves. The time for doubt has ended. The time for accountability must begin. (Videos from Ashkan Kalashy account. Thank you) #StopIranLobby #IranMassacre Department of State Secretary Marco Rubio Xiyue Wang NPR Yale University Massachusetts Peace Action (MAPA) German Institute for Global and Area Studies Körber-Stiftung IP Eckart Woertz Bert Hoffmann Miriam Prys-Hansen Alan Eyre A Shallal USC USCAlumni USC Public Diplomacy Los Angeles World Affairs Council & Town Hall Daily Trojan The John Quincy Adams Society Foreign Policy Los Angeles Times Department of Political Science @ SBU Oberlin College Harvard CMES

AAIRIA

17,676 次观看 • 5 个月前

Watch closely who is loudly opposing any strike on the Islamic Republic’s military infrastructure. Then look at who endorsed them. A recurring name appears: NIAC Action, the political arm of the National Iranian American Council. NIAC presents itself as a voice for Iranian-Americans. That’s the branding. The controversy begins when you examine its leadership history and political activity. It was founded by Trita Parsi (alongside others, including Siamak Namazi). Over the years, many Iranian dissidents and diaspora activists have accused NIAC of advocating positions that align closely with the Islamic Republic’s foreign policy goals, particularly around sanctions relief and nuclear negotiations. In 2012, Parsi sued an Iranian-American activist for defamation over claims that NIAC functioned as a regime lobby. During court discovery, internal emails became public. Those documents showed that Parsi had extensive communications with Iranian officials, including Javad Zarif. Later, Zarif became foreign minister and a central figure in negotiating the nuclear deal. The released emails revealed coordination of meetings, messaging discussions, and efforts to facilitate access between Iranian officials and U.S. policymakers. Parsi has argued these contacts were normal diplomatic engagement. But the pattern went beyond neutral policy advocacy and into organized influence aligned with Tehran’s strategic interests. That distinction matters. Diplomacy is not the same thing as lobbying on behalf of a foreign regime. But the boundary between them can blur, and that blur is exactly where influence operates. Fast-forward to recent debates. On Iranian state media, analyst Foad Izadi, a frequent voice on Iran’s state broadcaster, openly discussed lobbying networks in the U.S. and named Trita Parsi and NIAC as the regime lobbyists. When state-aligned figures publicly describe you as part of their influence ecosystem, people start asking questions. This is not about conspiracy theatrics. It’s about patterns: – Consistent advocacy for policies that reduce pressure on the regime. – Documented communication with senior Iranian officials. – Political endorsements aligned with anti-pressure positions. – Public acknowledgment from regime-aligned media of influence networks. Influence operates through policy framing, “community representation,” and access to lawmakers. The Islamic Republic has invested heavily in soft power abroad because it understands something fundamental: shaping Western policy is cheaper than confronting it militarily. The question isn’t whether people are allowed to argue against military strikes. Of course they are. The question is transparency. Who are they connected to? Who amplifies them? Who benefits from their policy outcomes? In geopolitics, follow incentives, not slogans. History shows that authoritarian regimes don’t just export missiles. They export narratives. And those narratives travel through institutions that claim to represent communities. When you see coordinated messaging, recurring endorsements, and documented back-channel access, it’s not irrational to ask: whose strategic objectives are being served? Power moves through relationships.

Watch closely who is loudly opposing any strike on the Islamic Republic’s military infrastructure. Then look at who endorsed them. A recurring name appears: NIAC Action, the political arm of the National Iranian American Council. NIAC presents itself as a voice for Iranian-Americans. That’s the branding. The controversy begins when you examine its leadership history and political activity. It was founded by Trita Parsi (alongside others, including Siamak Namazi). Over the years, many Iranian dissidents and diaspora activists have accused NIAC of advocating positions that align closely with the Islamic Republic’s foreign policy goals, particularly around sanctions relief and nuclear negotiations. In 2012, Parsi sued an Iranian-American activist for defamation over claims that NIAC functioned as a regime lobby. During court discovery, internal emails became public. Those documents showed that Parsi had extensive communications with Iranian officials, including Javad Zarif. Later, Zarif became foreign minister and a central figure in negotiating the nuclear deal. The released emails revealed coordination of meetings, messaging discussions, and efforts to facilitate access between Iranian officials and U.S. policymakers. Parsi has argued these contacts were normal diplomatic engagement. But the pattern went beyond neutral policy advocacy and into organized influence aligned with Tehran’s strategic interests. That distinction matters. Diplomacy is not the same thing as lobbying on behalf of a foreign regime. But the boundary between them can blur, and that blur is exactly where influence operates. Fast-forward to recent debates. On Iranian state media, analyst Foad Izadi, a frequent voice on Iran’s state broadcaster, openly discussed lobbying networks in the U.S. and named Trita Parsi and NIAC as the regime lobbyists. When state-aligned figures publicly describe you as part of their influence ecosystem, people start asking questions. This is not about conspiracy theatrics. It’s about patterns: – Consistent advocacy for policies that reduce pressure on the regime. – Documented communication with senior Iranian officials. – Political endorsements aligned with anti-pressure positions. – Public acknowledgment from regime-aligned media of influence networks. Influence operates through policy framing, “community representation,” and access to lawmakers. The Islamic Republic has invested heavily in soft power abroad because it understands something fundamental: shaping Western policy is cheaper than confronting it militarily. The question isn’t whether people are allowed to argue against military strikes. Of course they are. The question is transparency. Who are they connected to? Who amplifies them? Who benefits from their policy outcomes? In geopolitics, follow incentives, not slogans. History shows that authoritarian regimes don’t just export missiles. They export narratives. And those narratives travel through institutions that claim to represent communities. When you see coordinated messaging, recurring endorsements, and documented back-channel access, it’s not irrational to ask: whose strategic objectives are being served? Power moves through relationships.

Sana Ebrahimi Ledene

16,259 次观看 • 4 个月前

Literally every Iranian, inside Iran and across the diaspora, despises NIAC , its affiliates, especially Trita Parsi, and everything they stand for. That's not "doing something right." When an entire community whose name you claim to represent rejects you outright, the problem isn't optics or misunderstanding. The problem is you and the organization itself. You represent Iran's government, not the Iranian people. This is a photo sent to me from inside Iran. The people of Iran have a message for you:

Literally every Iranian, inside Iran and across the diaspora, despises NIAC , its affiliates, especially Trita Parsi, and everything they stand for. That's not "doing something right." When an entire community whose name you claim to represent rejects you outright, the problem isn't optics or misunderstanding. The problem is you and the organization itself. You represent Iran's government, not the Iranian people. This is a photo sent to me from inside Iran. The people of Iran have a message for you:

ثنا ابراهیمی | Sana Ebrahimi

30,288 次观看 • 5 个月前

Footage captured by Loomer Unleashed at the “No Kings” protest in DC this weekend captured anti-Trump protesters flying the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran while also holding NIAC signs. NIAC NIAC is an Iranian organization that has long faced criticism from members of Congress for its affiliation with the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Ayatollah. “No Kings” has fully embraced Islam, meaning the left has been Islamified. The House GOP House Republicans should continue pushing legislation, like bans on Sharia Law, to get Democrats on the record embracing the Islamification of America so the American people can further see this fact for themselves ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. This issue can save the GOP in the midterms, but it’s time Republicans get smart and raise hell about the Islamic takeover of America and the Democrat Party’s open embrace and glorification of Islamic jihad. RECEIPTS 👇🏻

Footage captured by Loomer Unleashed at the “No Kings” protest in DC this weekend captured anti-Trump protesters flying the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran while also holding NIAC signs. NIAC NIAC is an Iranian organization that has long faced criticism from members of Congress for its affiliation with the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Ayatollah. “No Kings” has fully embraced Islam, meaning the left has been Islamified. The House GOP House Republicans should continue pushing legislation, like bans on Sharia Law, to get Democrats on the record embracing the Islamification of America so the American people can further see this fact for themselves ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. This issue can save the GOP in the midterms, but it’s time Republicans get smart and raise hell about the Islamic takeover of America and the Democrat Party’s open embrace and glorification of Islamic jihad. RECEIPTS 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

97,458 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 NIAC’s Isabella Javidan Turns Tehran’s Repression Into an “I Told You So” This is the National Iranian American Council's communications manager Isabella Javidan on a recent Sunrise Movement call, and the framing is insane. Javidan points to the Iranian regime’s internet blackout and crackdown on dissent as evidence that “Iranian human rights defenders” were right to warn against military strikes. But that is exactly the kind of rhetoric that makes NIAC sound like an apologist outfit. When most people think of Iranian human rights defenders, they think of dissidents, exiles, political prisoners, and the people who have spent years exposing the regime’s censorship, torture, repression, and terror. They do not think of someone invoking a regime crackdown as an “I told you so” moment for an anti-war script. She also says diplomacy was “pushed aside by the same political forces that profit exponentially from confrontation.” Once again, the moral outrage is directed outward, while Tehran’s own role in dragging things out, hiding the depth of its nuclear ambitions, and continuing to enrich uranium far beyond any plausible civilian need fades into the background. Here's the pattern. The regime represses its own people, threatens the region, slow-rolls the West, and keeps enriching uranium beyond any believable peaceful purpose, yet the framing somehow always returns to Washington, Israel, and the enemies of “diplomacy.” When the framing so consistently redirects outrage outward while soft-pedaling Tehran’s conduct, it is not hard to see why NIAC gets accused of serving as an influence operation for the Iranian government.

🚨 NIAC’s Isabella Javidan Turns Tehran’s Repression Into an “I Told You So” This is the National Iranian American Council's communications manager Isabella Javidan on a recent Sunrise Movement call, and the framing is insane. Javidan points to the Iranian regime’s internet blackout and crackdown on dissent as evidence that “Iranian human rights defenders” were right to warn against military strikes. But that is exactly the kind of rhetoric that makes NIAC sound like an apologist outfit. When most people think of Iranian human rights defenders, they think of dissidents, exiles, political prisoners, and the people who have spent years exposing the regime’s censorship, torture, repression, and terror. They do not think of someone invoking a regime crackdown as an “I told you so” moment for an anti-war script. She also says diplomacy was “pushed aside by the same political forces that profit exponentially from confrontation.” Once again, the moral outrage is directed outward, while Tehran’s own role in dragging things out, hiding the depth of its nuclear ambitions, and continuing to enrich uranium far beyond any plausible civilian need fades into the background. Here's the pattern. The regime represses its own people, threatens the region, slow-rolls the West, and keeps enriching uranium beyond any believable peaceful purpose, yet the framing somehow always returns to Washington, Israel, and the enemies of “diplomacy.” When the framing so consistently redirects outrage outward while soft-pedaling Tehran’s conduct, it is not hard to see why NIAC gets accused of serving as an influence operation for the Iranian government.

Stu Smith

22,702 次观看 • 4 个月前

Thomas Massie told Tucker that he may lose because “at least 95%” of the money against him is from the “Israeli lobby.” He listed the RJC, AIPAC, and other American groups with pro-Israel positions, and falsely labeled them a “foreign lobby” when none of them are. Massie failed to acknowledge that he has taken thousands of dollars from the Mahrouq family, and has an A+ score for NIAC. He may not be funded by pro-Israel American groups, but he is certainly influenced by pro-Iran and pro-Palestinian groups with foreign ties.

Thomas Massie told Tucker that he may lose because “at least 95%” of the money against him is from the “Israeli lobby.” He listed the RJC, AIPAC, and other American groups with pro-Israel positions, and falsely labeled them a “foreign lobby” when none of them are. Massie failed to acknowledge that he has taken thousands of dollars from the Mahrouq family, and has an A+ score for NIAC. He may not be funded by pro-Israel American groups, but he is certainly influenced by pro-Iran and pro-Palestinian groups with foreign ties.

Justin

77,845 次观看 • 1 个月前

Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, Chris Murphy, Rand Paul, and others sold out their country for NIAC, the D.C.-based Iran lobby for the Islamist regime. Here is Ro Khanna reading his script after NIAC gave him an 'award.' "Hi, I'm so honored to be receiving this award, and I look forward to continuing to work together to build a more just foreign policy, to have restraint in our endless wars, to support diplomacy, and to see peace in the Middle East. I believe that the JCPOA that was negotiated with Iran was a path forward. We must recommit to the JCPOA under a new administration."

Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, Chris Murphy, Rand Paul, and others sold out their country for NIAC, the D.C.-based Iran lobby for the Islamist regime. Here is Ro Khanna reading his script after NIAC gave him an 'award.' "Hi, I'm so honored to be receiving this award, and I look forward to continuing to work together to build a more just foreign policy, to have restraint in our endless wars, to support diplomacy, and to see peace in the Middle East. I believe that the JCPOA that was negotiated with Iran was a path forward. We must recommit to the JCPOA under a new administration."

Apple Lamps

43,210 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨SURPRISE, SURPRISE!!! Tucker Qatarlson Hosts Trita Parsi, Named on Iranian State TV as the Islamic Republic’s Lobbyist in America In a notable interview, Tucker Carlson sat down with Trita Parsi, founder of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). In February, IRGC-run state television, run by the IRGC, explicitly named Trita Parsi as the “Islamic Republic’s lobbyist in America.” Court records from a 2008 defamation lawsuit filed by Parsi and NIAC (which they ultimately lost) revealed extensive email correspondence showing Parsi directly coordinating with Iranian regime officials. This included helping arrange meetings between then-Foreign Minister Javad Zarif and U.S. members of Congress. The court sanctioned Parsi and NIAC $184,000 for serious discovery violations, including: • Withholding thousands of emails • Altering documents (such as scrubbing references to “lobbying”) • Misleading the judge The presiding judge ruled that Parsi’s activities were “not inconsistent” with acting as an advocate for the Iranian regime.

🚨SURPRISE, SURPRISE!!! Tucker Qatarlson Hosts Trita Parsi, Named on Iranian State TV as the Islamic Republic’s Lobbyist in America In a notable interview, Tucker Carlson sat down with Trita Parsi, founder of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). In February, IRGC-run state television, run by the IRGC, explicitly named Trita Parsi as the “Islamic Republic’s lobbyist in America.” Court records from a 2008 defamation lawsuit filed by Parsi and NIAC (which they ultimately lost) revealed extensive email correspondence showing Parsi directly coordinating with Iranian regime officials. This included helping arrange meetings between then-Foreign Minister Javad Zarif and U.S. members of Congress. The court sanctioned Parsi and NIAC $184,000 for serious discovery violations, including: • Withholding thousands of emails • Altering documents (such as scrubbing references to “lobbying”) • Misleading the judge The presiding judge ruled that Parsi’s activities were “not inconsistent” with acting as an advocate for the Iranian regime.

Sana Ebrahimi Ledene

16,479 次观看 • 1 个月前

Iran has been at war with the United States for 47 years and has the blood of thousands of American soldiers and citizens on its hands. This is an opportunity for the Iranian people to live in freedom. It is not risk-free, and it is not guaranteed. But it is a chance to change geopolitics for the better. I support President Donald J. Trump in making this tough decision.

Iran has been at war with the United States for 47 years and has the blood of thousands of American soldiers and citizens on its hands. This is an opportunity for the Iranian people to live in freedom. It is not risk-free, and it is not guaranteed. But it is a chance to change geopolitics for the better. I support President Donald J. Trump in making this tough decision.

Senator Ron Johnson

35,667 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 And another one… Former Princeton University professor, and now CUNY Visiting Scholar, Behrooz Ghamari-Tabrizi is from Iran. He’s on record stating that the Iranian regime is “good for women’s health.” He denies Hamas committed sexual assaults against women on Oct 7, and admits that he maintains friendships with men involved in the seizure of the U.S. Embassy in 1979. He’s a member of NIAC, the National Iranian American Council. An extremely powerful tentacle of the Iranian regime that cloaks itself as an “advocacy group.” Why, it’s almost as if some Iranian professors are only here to spread anti-West propaganda and support a genocidal regime. Department of State Secretary Linda McMahon

🚨 And another one… Former Princeton University professor, and now CUNY Visiting Scholar, Behrooz Ghamari-Tabrizi is from Iran. He’s on record stating that the Iranian regime is “good for women’s health.” He denies Hamas committed sexual assaults against women on Oct 7, and admits that he maintains friendships with men involved in the seizure of the U.S. Embassy in 1979. He’s a member of NIAC, the National Iranian American Council. An extremely powerful tentacle of the Iranian regime that cloaks itself as an “advocacy group.” Why, it’s almost as if some Iranian professors are only here to spread anti-West propaganda and support a genocidal regime. Department of State Secretary Linda McMahon

NizNellie3

124,669 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 IRAN'S CAPITOL HILL COUP D'ÉTAT: The Tehran Trojan Horse Just Filed Impeachment Against America's Secretary of War Pete Hegseth— Receipts Attached 🚨 While U.S. forces are in the crosshairs of the Islamic Republic's nuclear ambitions and proxy terror, Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ-03) — Iranian-American Congresswoman, daughter of Iranian immigrants, and longtime NIAC-endorsed asset — has filed Articles of Impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Her charges? "Unauthorized war against Iran" and "violations of the law of armed conflict" for striking Iranian targets... including what her press release calls a "girls’ school in Minab." Translation: Hegseth had the audacity to hit back at the regime — so Ansari is trying to decapitate America's war leadership mid-conflict. Receipts (screenshots attached in Laura Loomer's post linked below— review them yourself): 1. Ansari's own press release boasting she filed impeachment for "repeatedly violating his oath" and endangering troops by refusing to stand down against Iran. She literally cites civilian strikes in the Islamic Republic as proof of "high crimes." 2. NIAC's own website — the organization the Iranian state media has called "the regime’s lobbying arm in the United States" — proudly listing Ansari as their endorsed Iranian-American candidate. 3. Billboards of NIAC co-founder Trita Parsi plastered across Tehran right now — propaganda honoring the very network pushing sanctions relief, nuclear tolerance, and anti-Hegseth talking points inside the U.S. government. And the video (below fromLaura Loomer) is pure nightmare fuel: Iranian officials on a panel openly discussing their coordination with Parsi and NIAC — then panicking "Be careful, this is being recorded!" This isn't "oversight." This isn't "policy disagreement." This is hybrid warfare — a foreign influence operation using the impeachment clause as a political weapon to protect the ayatollahs while American service members bleed. It echoes the Framers' worst fears in the Federalist Papers: foreign corruption of our republic (Federalist No. 68). It smells like potential FARA violations, material support concerns, and dual-loyalty threats the Founders warned would destroy the republic from within. Trita Parsi — Iranian/Swedish citizen, U.S. green card holder, regime mouthpiece — built NIAC into exactly what critics (and Iranian media) have always said it was. His billboards in Iran aren't a coincidence. Ansari's timing isn't a coincidence. FBI Homeland Security Secretary Marco Rubio U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari: Investigate. Now. Bank records. Communications. The whole network. America does not tolerate foreign agents in uniform — or in Congress. Pete Hegseth stays. The mullahs lose. America First. Full stop. Share this before they memory-hole it. This is how empires fall — from within! Visit Laura's post at: for receipts and follow her Laura Loomer for updates. #IranianCoupInCongress #TehranTrojanHorse #HegsethImpeachmentHoax #NIACExposed #TritaParsiDeport #ForeignAgentInCongress #FARA #AmericaFirst #SecWarHegseth

🚨 IRAN'S CAPITOL HILL COUP D'ÉTAT: The Tehran Trojan Horse Just Filed Impeachment Against America's Secretary of War Pete Hegseth— Receipts Attached 🚨 While U.S. forces are in the crosshairs of the Islamic Republic's nuclear ambitions and proxy terror, Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ-03) — Iranian-American Congresswoman, daughter of Iranian immigrants, and longtime NIAC-endorsed asset — has filed Articles of Impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Her charges? "Unauthorized war against Iran" and "violations of the law of armed conflict" for striking Iranian targets... including what her press release calls a "girls’ school in Minab." Translation: Hegseth had the audacity to hit back at the regime — so Ansari is trying to decapitate America's war leadership mid-conflict. Receipts (screenshots attached in Laura Loomer's post linked below— review them yourself): 1. Ansari's own press release boasting she filed impeachment for "repeatedly violating his oath" and endangering troops by refusing to stand down against Iran. She literally cites civilian strikes in the Islamic Republic as proof of "high crimes." 2. NIAC's own website — the organization the Iranian state media has called "the regime’s lobbying arm in the United States" — proudly listing Ansari as their endorsed Iranian-American candidate. 3. Billboards of NIAC co-founder Trita Parsi plastered across Tehran right now — propaganda honoring the very network pushing sanctions relief, nuclear tolerance, and anti-Hegseth talking points inside the U.S. government. And the video (below fromLaura Loomer) is pure nightmare fuel: Iranian officials on a panel openly discussing their coordination with Parsi and NIAC — then panicking "Be careful, this is being recorded!" This isn't "oversight." This isn't "policy disagreement." This is hybrid warfare — a foreign influence operation using the impeachment clause as a political weapon to protect the ayatollahs while American service members bleed. It echoes the Framers' worst fears in the Federalist Papers: foreign corruption of our republic (Federalist No. 68). It smells like potential FARA violations, material support concerns, and dual-loyalty threats the Founders warned would destroy the republic from within. Trita Parsi — Iranian/Swedish citizen, U.S. green card holder, regime mouthpiece — built NIAC into exactly what critics (and Iranian media) have always said it was. His billboards in Iran aren't a coincidence. Ansari's timing isn't a coincidence. FBI Homeland Security Secretary Marco Rubio U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari: Investigate. Now. Bank records. Communications. The whole network. America does not tolerate foreign agents in uniform — or in Congress. Pete Hegseth stays. The mullahs lose. America First. Full stop. Share this before they memory-hole it. This is how empires fall — from within! Visit Laura's post at: for receipts and follow her Laura Loomer for updates. #IranianCoupInCongress #TehranTrojanHorse #HegsethImpeachmentHoax #NIACExposed #TritaParsiDeport #ForeignAgentInCongress #FARA #AmericaFirst #SecWarHegseth

Tony Seruga

13,983 次观看 • 2 个月前

Amb. Mike Huckabee in video message to ADL's 2026 Never is Now conference: "Let's be clear, this [war with Iran] isn't about Israel—this is about all of the free world." "It's certainly about Jewish people, it is about Israel, but it's about the United States, and a lot of Americans don't seem to understand that for 47 years the Iranian regime has threatened 'Death to America'—and they mean it!" "They twice hired people to assassinate the president…" "This is not a conflict in which the United States is doing something for Israel, this is that the United States is doing something for Americans—and I hope people understand it." "The rise of anti-Semitism [is a cancer in our country]. When we say, 'No, Never Again,' we need to mean it… It needs to be a lifestyle…"

Amb. Mike Huckabee in video message to ADL's 2026 Never is Now conference: "Let's be clear, this [war with Iran] isn't about Israel—this is about all of the free world." "It's certainly about Jewish people, it is about Israel, but it's about the United States, and a lot of Americans don't seem to understand that for 47 years the Iranian regime has threatened 'Death to America'—and they mean it!" "They twice hired people to assassinate the president…" "This is not a conflict in which the United States is doing something for Israel, this is that the United States is doing something for Americans—and I hope people understand it." "The rise of anti-Semitism [is a cancer in our country]. When we say, 'No, Never Again,' we need to mean it… It needs to be a lifestyle…"

Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

18,119 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: I'm speaking of Netanyahu. 🚨Netanyahu is a MASS MURDERER. 🚨Netanyahu. is a KILLER. 🚨He commits war crimes. And he has control over American foreign policy and over American domestic policy now. 🚨That's the FACT. The U.S. government is run by Israel, by the Israeli government. Why and how, it's a little hard to say, but it is the unbelievable fact that this brazenness, this recklessness, this cruelty, this arrogance from this extremist Israeli government controls American policy vis-a-vis speech in the United States now. It's shocking but true.

🚨Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: I'm speaking of Netanyahu. 🚨Netanyahu is a MASS MURDERER. 🚨Netanyahu. is a KILLER. 🚨He commits war crimes. And he has control over American foreign policy and over American domestic policy now. 🚨That's the FACT. The U.S. government is run by Israel, by the Israeli government. Why and how, it's a little hard to say, but it is the unbelievable fact that this brazenness, this recklessness, this cruelty, this arrogance from this extremist Israeli government controls American policy vis-a-vis speech in the United States now. It's shocking but true.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

115,493 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸 A JOURNALIST FROM JERUSALEM WARNS OF ISRAEL'S REAL AGENDA IN IRAN, LEBANON, AND BEYOND: "LISTEN TO WHAT THEY SAY IN HEBREW." Rula Jebreal is a journalist who comes from a Palestinian background and grew up in Jerusalem, spending decades immersed in Israeli media. She says if you only consume what Israel says in English, you're watching a PR operation. The real policy is spoken in Hebrew. She argues this war is not really about security, but about reshaping the region so Israel remains dominant while its neighbors are weakened, fragmented, and unable to challenge it. She argues Israeli and American strategic goals in this war are not aligned. They're opposite. Netanyahu has been pushing for this exact conflict for 40 years, and now he has a president willing to execute it with American weapons, American money, and American lives. She says Israel doesn't want a stable Middle East. It wants failed states on every border. Libya. Afghanistan. That's the model. And Iran isn't the final destination. It's a stop along the way. Full interview with Rula Jebreal below

🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸 A JOURNALIST FROM JERUSALEM WARNS OF ISRAEL'S REAL AGENDA IN IRAN, LEBANON, AND BEYOND: "LISTEN TO WHAT THEY SAY IN HEBREW." Rula Jebreal is a journalist who comes from a Palestinian background and grew up in Jerusalem, spending decades immersed in Israeli media. She says if you only consume what Israel says in English, you're watching a PR operation. The real policy is spoken in Hebrew. She argues this war is not really about security, but about reshaping the region so Israel remains dominant while its neighbors are weakened, fragmented, and unable to challenge it. She argues Israeli and American strategic goals in this war are not aligned. They're opposite. Netanyahu has been pushing for this exact conflict for 40 years, and now he has a president willing to execute it with American weapons, American money, and American lives. She says Israel doesn't want a stable Middle East. It wants failed states on every border. Libya. Afghanistan. That's the model. And Iran isn't the final destination. It's a stop along the way. Full interview with Rula Jebreal below

Mario Nawfal

853,824 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱 THE SILENCED TRUTH: ISRAELI LOBBYING & THE ROAD TO WAR Why did the U.S. really start a war with Iran? The answer is often buried by the media, even when it comes from the administration’s own officials. Former NCTC director Joe Kent made it clear: the war began due to intense pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. Matthew Hoh explains that this is the result of a decades-long "public relations" program designed to ensure American editors and reporters are too afraid to speak the truth. When the interests of a foreign government dictate American military policy, the first casualty is always the truth. Matthew Hoh

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱 THE SILENCED TRUTH: ISRAELI LOBBYING & THE ROAD TO WAR Why did the U.S. really start a war with Iran? The answer is often buried by the media, even when it comes from the administration’s own officials. Former NCTC director Joe Kent made it clear: the war began due to intense pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. Matthew Hoh explains that this is the result of a decades-long "public relations" program designed to ensure American editors and reporters are too afraid to speak the truth. When the interests of a foreign government dictate American military policy, the first casualty is always the truth. Matthew Hoh

Mario Nawfal

41,648 次观看 • 4 个月前

. Markwayne Mullin keeps saying he “would love” the best relationship with the Iranian people and wants to see a return to pre‑1979 relations, while insisting he is still “waiting” for a leader to emerge. With genuine respect, I have to ask how closely he is actually listening to Iranians. In the past months, hundreds of thousands of Iranians in the diaspora have filled the streets of Munich, Berlin, Toronto, Los Angeles and beyond, many of them openly rallying around Reza Pahlavi as the figure they see as a transitional leader. Inside Iran, students and protesters have risked prison, torture and death while chanting his name and calling for an end to this regime. Those are not abstract signals; they are an unmistakable, sustained demand for a specific path forward. So when Senator Mullen says he is still “waiting” for a leader, it raises a serious question: whose voices is he actually hearing? Lobby groups and exiled factions with no real base like NIAC and NCRI, or the real people in Iran and in the streets worldwide who have already chosen the person they want to guide a democratic transition? If the goal is to stand with the Iranian people, then it is time to acknowledge the leadership they themselves are affirming, rather than pretending it does not exist. President Donald J. Trump Secretary Marco Rubio Mark R. Levin #rezapahlavi

. Markwayne Mullin keeps saying he “would love” the best relationship with the Iranian people and wants to see a return to pre‑1979 relations, while insisting he is still “waiting” for a leader to emerge. With genuine respect, I have to ask how closely he is actually listening to Iranians. In the past months, hundreds of thousands of Iranians in the diaspora have filled the streets of Munich, Berlin, Toronto, Los Angeles and beyond, many of them openly rallying around Reza Pahlavi as the figure they see as a transitional leader. Inside Iran, students and protesters have risked prison, torture and death while chanting his name and calling for an end to this regime. Those are not abstract signals; they are an unmistakable, sustained demand for a specific path forward. So when Senator Mullen says he is still “waiting” for a leader, it raises a serious question: whose voices is he actually hearing? Lobby groups and exiled factions with no real base like NIAC and NCRI, or the real people in Iran and in the streets worldwide who have already chosen the person they want to guide a democratic transition? If the goal is to stand with the Iranian people, then it is time to acknowledge the leadership they themselves are affirming, rather than pretending it does not exist. President Donald J. Trump Secretary Marco Rubio Mark R. Levin #rezapahlavi

Kusha

17,080 次观看 • 4 个月前

🔴 How can lobbyists spend more than two hours discussing the human rights situation in Iran and still save the regime? An analysis of the (Green) Heinrich Böll Foundation panel from 2016 First, a note about the participants: - Hadi Ghaemi served on the board of NIAC (the regime's lobby group) for many years and later founded the NGO “Center for Human Rights in Iran.” As leaks of his communications with Trita Parsi from that time show, Ghaemi’s explicit goal was to establish an NGO that did not advocate for the overthrow of the regime. The fact that Ghaemi was a member of NIAC is being kept under wraps. - Omid Nouripour (a Green Party politician) has had ties to NIAC-members for years. The linked post shows how he has helped stabilize the regime for many years. - Ziba Mir-Hosseini is advocating for women’s rights and gender equality within Islam. - The moderator and initiator of the panel is Ali Fathollah-Nejad (CMEG). He, too, has a long history of ties to NIAC members. His entire political work is based on preserving the regime through, for example, pro-JCPOA and anti-sanctions stances. About the panel: 1. The entire panel does not even once question the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic itself. Everyone is engaged in an intellectual discussion about how to bring about small improvements within the regime. They all accept that it isn’t working, that execution rates are rising, and that change would take a long time. The idea of ending the regime to improve the human rights situation in Iran isn’t even a conceivable option in this panel. 2. In the introduction, Fathollah-Nejad claims that the era of regime change is over and that a new era is beginning. He also claims that the suffering of the Iranian people is only partly due to the regime and partly due to "imperial pressure". 3. Ghaemi founded a regime-affiliated NGO to present the regime’s narrative to the West under the guise of a human rights organization. According to Ghaemi, everyone in the civilian population supports the JCPOA and opposes military intervention by the U.S. and Israel. Of course, this did not reflect the actual will of the people in Iran. It was the selective narrative that the regime-affiliated NGO presented to the West to advance its own interests. 4. As for the opposition, the only person mentioned by the entire panel is Narges Mohammadi, who is the face of the regime’s reformist wing. She, too, does not represent the end of the Islamic Republic. 5. The panelists are all pro-JCPOA. Nouripour claims that the money from the JCPOA is rightfully the regime's money and lists the positive things the regime is doing with it (boosting the economy, creating jobs). This “on the one hand, on the other hand” narrative is, first of all, untrue: the money did not benefit the people. And it downplays the downsides of the JCPOA: funding for terrorist proxies and more money for repression. Nouripour mentions it, but treats it as if it were on equal footing. 6. According to Ghaemi, 80% of the executions is “merely” due to drug-related cases. Even if that were true - which it certainly was not - it would not serve as a justification. According to Ghaemi, no pressure from within or without can put an end to the executions. 7. Mir-Hosseini claims that Ahmadinejad ultimately became a supporter of women's rights. 8. Fathollah-Nejad claims that there is a danger that “authoritarian stability” could emerge in Iran. They speak of the future in this context. This is meant to convey that the Islamic Republic had not yet been that at the time. Judging by the human rights crimes that took place under the regime up until 2016, this is a statement that whitewashes the regime. 9. The panelists are against sanctions. 10. Ghaemi, in particular, repeats the false narrative that there are reformists and hardliners within the regime. This illusion of an opposition within the system has prolonged the life of the Islamic Republic by decades. As I listen to this panel, three things become clear to me: - Every one of the panelists wants the Islamic Republic to survive, either because of their Muslim background or because they are part of the NIAC ecosystem. - All four panelists are aware of the regime’s human rights abuses. But they justify and downplay them. - And finally, this image comes to mind: The panelists strike me as people (in fireproof suits) in a burning house who - instead of leaving the house or calling the fire department - take two glasses and repeatedly pour a few drops of water from one glass into the other. They claim that the fire is indeed hot, but that they are doing something about it and that the situation will surely change soon. Meanwhile, all the children in the house have already died in the fire.

🔴 How can lobbyists spend more than two hours discussing the human rights situation in Iran and still save the regime? An analysis of the (Green) Heinrich Böll Foundation panel from 2016 First, a note about the participants: - Hadi Ghaemi served on the board of NIAC (the regime's lobby group) for many years and later founded the NGO “Center for Human Rights in Iran.” As leaks of his communications with Trita Parsi from that time show, Ghaemi’s explicit goal was to establish an NGO that did not advocate for the overthrow of the regime. The fact that Ghaemi was a member of NIAC is being kept under wraps. - Omid Nouripour (a Green Party politician) has had ties to NIAC-members for years. The linked post shows how he has helped stabilize the regime for many years. - Ziba Mir-Hosseini is advocating for women’s rights and gender equality within Islam. - The moderator and initiator of the panel is Ali Fathollah-Nejad (CMEG). He, too, has a long history of ties to NIAC members. His entire political work is based on preserving the regime through, for example, pro-JCPOA and anti-sanctions stances. About the panel: 1. The entire panel does not even once question the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic itself. Everyone is engaged in an intellectual discussion about how to bring about small improvements within the regime. They all accept that it isn’t working, that execution rates are rising, and that change would take a long time. The idea of ending the regime to improve the human rights situation in Iran isn’t even a conceivable option in this panel. 2. In the introduction, Fathollah-Nejad claims that the era of regime change is over and that a new era is beginning. He also claims that the suffering of the Iranian people is only partly due to the regime and partly due to "imperial pressure". 3. Ghaemi founded a regime-affiliated NGO to present the regime’s narrative to the West under the guise of a human rights organization. According to Ghaemi, everyone in the civilian population supports the JCPOA and opposes military intervention by the U.S. and Israel. Of course, this did not reflect the actual will of the people in Iran. It was the selective narrative that the regime-affiliated NGO presented to the West to advance its own interests. 4. As for the opposition, the only person mentioned by the entire panel is Narges Mohammadi, who is the face of the regime’s reformist wing. She, too, does not represent the end of the Islamic Republic. 5. The panelists are all pro-JCPOA. Nouripour claims that the money from the JCPOA is rightfully the regime's money and lists the positive things the regime is doing with it (boosting the economy, creating jobs). This “on the one hand, on the other hand” narrative is, first of all, untrue: the money did not benefit the people. And it downplays the downsides of the JCPOA: funding for terrorist proxies and more money for repression. Nouripour mentions it, but treats it as if it were on equal footing. 6. According to Ghaemi, 80% of the executions is “merely” due to drug-related cases. Even if that were true - which it certainly was not - it would not serve as a justification. According to Ghaemi, no pressure from within or without can put an end to the executions. 7. Mir-Hosseini claims that Ahmadinejad ultimately became a supporter of women's rights. 8. Fathollah-Nejad claims that there is a danger that “authoritarian stability” could emerge in Iran. They speak of the future in this context. This is meant to convey that the Islamic Republic had not yet been that at the time. Judging by the human rights crimes that took place under the regime up until 2016, this is a statement that whitewashes the regime. 9. The panelists are against sanctions. 10. Ghaemi, in particular, repeats the false narrative that there are reformists and hardliners within the regime. This illusion of an opposition within the system has prolonged the life of the Islamic Republic by decades. As I listen to this panel, three things become clear to me: - Every one of the panelists wants the Islamic Republic to survive, either because of their Muslim background or because they are part of the NIAC ecosystem. - All four panelists are aware of the regime’s human rights abuses. But they justify and downplay them. - And finally, this image comes to mind: The panelists strike me as people (in fireproof suits) in a burning house who - instead of leaving the house or calling the fire department - take two glasses and repeatedly pour a few drops of water from one glass into the other. They claim that the fire is indeed hot, but that they are doing something about it and that the situation will surely change soon. Meanwhile, all the children in the house have already died in the fire.

diana bloom

21,636 次观看 • 2 个月前