Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

This week on Downstream, technology analyst and author Dan Wang joins Aaron Bastani to compare China, the US and the UK. “For the Chinese, there is no problem that cannot be solved with yet another bridge, road, highway, hyperscaler, coal plant, home, and so China is just building its... show more

Novara Media

222,376 subscribers

92,048 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

China is an Engineering State. The US is run by Lawyers. Deng Xiaoping transformed China by building a technocratic state around engineers. The stunning turnaround of ⁦Eskom Hld SOC Ltd⁩ was orchestrated by Engineers. The Minister, the Chairman and CEO are all Engineers

China is an Engineering State. The US is run by Lawyers. Deng Xiaoping transformed China by building a technocratic state around engineers. The stunning turnaround of ⁦Eskom Hld SOC Ltd⁩ was orchestrated by Engineers. The Minister, the Chairman and CEO are all Engineers

Jacob Maroga

61,276 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

“The Israel brand is destroyed.” On Downstream, Matt Kennard tells Aaron Bastani that Israel is turning increasingly to the law to discipline critics since its reputation has been shattered. In a country of just nine million people, Kennard adds, it’s not surprising that Israel has fought so hard the lobby the governments of former imperial powers. Aaron Bastani in conversation with investigative journalist and military analyst, Matt Kennard. Watch the full episode of Downstream on our YouTube channel.

Novara Media

26,071 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Talking about China-US relations, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Friday at the 61st Munich Security Conference (MSC) in Germany that China and the US must not come into conflict; otherwise, the world will suffer. However, if the US insists on suppressing China, we will go along with it to the end, Wang said. “Chinese people have never believed in superstitions and are not afraid of ghosts. The new China has developed and grown amid overcoming various difficulties and obstacles.” “There is a Chinese saying, 'Let him be strong, and the breeze caresses the hillocks; let him be peremptory, and the moon shines on the great river.' This reflects the temperament of the Chinese people and the character of the Chinese nation," Wang said.

Talking about China-US relations, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Friday at the 61st Munich Security Conference (MSC) in Germany that China and the US must not come into conflict; otherwise, the world will suffer. However, if the US insists on suppressing China, we will go along with it to the end, Wang said. “Chinese people have never believed in superstitions and are not afraid of ghosts. The new China has developed and grown amid overcoming various difficulties and obstacles.” “There is a Chinese saying, 'Let him be strong, and the breeze caresses the hillocks; let him be peremptory, and the moon shines on the great river.' This reflects the temperament of the Chinese people and the character of the Chinese nation," Wang said.

Global Times

84,870 просмотров • 1 год назад

"INDIA IS THE ONLY COUNTRY ON EARTH THAT FUNDAMENTALLY RIVALS CHINA..." US Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth Jacob Helberg says, "... India obviously is the only country on earth that fundamentally rivals China with respect to the depth of its engineering workforce and talent pool... It has a true nascent technology ecosystem and is making some pretty incredible contributions at the application layer, which we think is absolutely essential for technology diffusion..."

"INDIA IS THE ONLY COUNTRY ON EARTH THAT FUNDAMENTALLY RIVALS CHINA..." US Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth Jacob Helberg says, "... India obviously is the only country on earth that fundamentally rivals China with respect to the depth of its engineering workforce and talent pool... It has a true nascent technology ecosystem and is making some pretty incredible contributions at the application layer, which we think is absolutely essential for technology diffusion..."

Rahul Shivshankar

89,383 просмотров • 28 дней назад

"China is not the US, and it should not be viewed through the lens of America's path," said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Wednesday during the 13th round of the China-EU High-level Strategic Dialogue. He called on Europe to adopt a pragmatic and rational view on China.

"China is not the US, and it should not be viewed through the lens of America's path," said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Wednesday during the 13th round of the China-EU High-level Strategic Dialogue. He called on Europe to adopt a pragmatic and rational view on China.

Global Times

31,225 просмотров • 1 год назад

Former World Bank economist Branko Milanovic talks to Aaron Bastani about the different ways to measure an economy. According to Branko's preferred metric, China is in fact the biggest. “But I've noticed that in the China Daily, for example, which is de facto the official publication, and elsewhere, even in the political documents, there is always this mention of the ‘second largest,’ in a positive way. Like, ‘We are strong, we are big, but we are second.’ ” Watch the full episode of Downstream on Novara’s YouTube channel.

Former World Bank economist Branko Milanovic talks to Aaron Bastani about the different ways to measure an economy. According to Branko's preferred metric, China is in fact the biggest. “But I've noticed that in the China Daily, for example, which is de facto the official publication, and elsewhere, even in the political documents, there is always this mention of the ‘second largest,’ in a positive way. Like, ‘We are strong, we are big, but we are second.’ ” Watch the full episode of Downstream on Novara’s YouTube channel.

Novara Media

21,520 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

In this week's Bold Names, author and China expert Dan Wang says that China is an “engineering state,” while the U.S. is a “lawyerly society.” Which superpower has the upper hand in the current geopolitical and technological arms race? 🎧 Listen:

In this week's Bold Names, author and China expert Dan Wang says that China is an “engineering state,” while the U.S. is a “lawyerly society.” Which superpower has the upper hand in the current geopolitical and technological arms race? 🎧 Listen:

The Wall Street Journal

77,633 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

And CHINA, who cannot make a common bridge or building safely, is building China Bridge over PANAMA CANAL. This is direct and flagrant violation of US treating with Panama. China must stop building this trap until American engineers are on site 24/7 with full access to all plans, drawings, maps, materials, worksites, and to all personnel involved in the physical construction, planning, management, maintenance, finance, legal papers, lawyers, and agreements.

And CHINA, who cannot make a common bridge or building safely, is building China Bridge over PANAMA CANAL. This is direct and flagrant violation of US treating with Panama. China must stop building this trap until American engineers are on site 24/7 with full access to all plans, drawings, maps, materials, worksites, and to all personnel involved in the physical construction, planning, management, maintenance, finance, legal papers, lawyers, and agreements.

Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

84,176 просмотров • 1 год назад

China's FM Wang Yi with 4 straightforward questions for the US, in the context of the bill to ban TikTok, the semiconductors sanctions on China, and the multiplication of banned Chinese products in the US (EV cars, port cranes, etc.) "If the US says one thing and does another, where is its credibility as a major country? If it gets jittery whenever it hears the word 'China', where is its confidence as a major country? If it only wants itself to prosper but denies other countries' legitimate development, where is international fairness? If it persistently monopolizes the high-end of the value chain and keeps China at the low end, where is fairness in competition?"

China's FM Wang Yi with 4 straightforward questions for the US, in the context of the bill to ban TikTok, the semiconductors sanctions on China, and the multiplication of banned Chinese products in the US (EV cars, port cranes, etc.) "If the US says one thing and does another, where is its credibility as a major country? If it gets jittery whenever it hears the word 'China', where is its confidence as a major country? If it only wants itself to prosper but denies other countries' legitimate development, where is international fairness? If it persistently monopolizes the high-end of the value chain and keeps China at the low end, where is fairness in competition?"

Arnaud Bertrand

185,691 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Dan Wang (Dan Wang) is one of the sharpest thinkers on China and its relationship with the US. Dan spent six years living in China studying its manufacturing and technology ecosystem, and his new book Breakneck is the best framework I’ve seen for understanding US-China competition. I’ve read his annual letters and research on China for years and they’re some of the most thoughtful writing on how the country really works. In this conversation, we explore why it’s far harder for the US to rebuild manufacturing than for China to improve scientific research – a dynamic with implications for AI, national security, and investing. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:49 The Engineering State 2:41 Historical Roots of China's Mindset 4:25 Pluralism 7:42 US Spark vs. China's Prairie Fire 12:42 Who Will Adapt Faster? 15:09 How the US Can Revive Manufacturing 18:11 America's Many "Sputnik Moments" 27:42 China's Bleeding-Edge Cities 34:15 Comparing Work Ethic 38:27 ByteDance 51:00 The Lawyerly State vs. The Engineering State 59:56 China vs USSR 1:03:49 Fleeing China 1:14:18 The AI Race 1:19:33 Lessons from Huawei and Xiaomi 1:41:00 Kindest Thing

Dan Wang (Dan Wang) is one of the sharpest thinkers on China and its relationship with the US. Dan spent six years living in China studying its manufacturing and technology ecosystem, and his new book Breakneck is the best framework I’ve seen for understanding US-China competition. I’ve read his annual letters and research on China for years and they’re some of the most thoughtful writing on how the country really works. In this conversation, we explore why it’s far harder for the US to rebuild manufacturing than for China to improve scientific research – a dynamic with implications for AI, national security, and investing. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:49 The Engineering State 2:41 Historical Roots of China's Mindset 4:25 Pluralism 7:42 US Spark vs. China's Prairie Fire 12:42 Who Will Adapt Faster? 15:09 How the US Can Revive Manufacturing 18:11 America's Many "Sputnik Moments" 27:42 China's Bleeding-Edge Cities 34:15 Comparing Work Ethic 38:27 ByteDance 51:00 The Lawyerly State vs. The Engineering State 59:56 China vs USSR 1:03:49 Fleeing China 1:14:18 The AI Race 1:19:33 Lessons from Huawei and Xiaomi 1:41:00 Kindest Thing

Patrick OShaughnessy

164,716 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

This is a brilliant explanation by physicist steve hsu of the enormous mistake the US made with its semiconductor sanctions on China, basically sanctioning its own firms and creating a huge market opportunity for Chinese companies.

This is a brilliant explanation by physicist steve hsu of the enormous mistake the US made with its semiconductor sanctions on China, basically sanctioning its own firms and creating a huge market opportunity for Chinese companies.

Arnaud Bertrand

340,457 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨Victor Gao: China🇨🇳 is NOT supplying weapons to Iran, Iran is on its way to SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDING itself against the US🇺🇸 and Israel ‘China calls for an immediate end to this war, and China applauds and very much is opposed to a war of aggression. China’s support to Iran has been unequivocal, very explicit. And this is the reason why Iran has been expressing thanks to the very strong and consistent Chinese support. China, I think, believes Iran still has enough wherewithal to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. And I don’t think there has been any specific request from Iran for Chinese military help. And this is the reality. So I’m firmly opposed to any allegation that China is supplying weapons to Iran. Iran is fully capable of defending itself because it keeps demonstrating and surprising many countries by the kind of weapons, either drones or missiles, or even missiles with a range of up to 4000 kilometres and all kinds of warheads that they can carry. And I think Iran is on its way to successfully defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity, regardless of the massive amount of losses, including loss of life, that the United States and Israel have inflicted on Iran. Iran has not requested for any military aid from China, and China does not supply weapons to a country at war.’ -Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

🚨Victor Gao: China🇨🇳 is NOT supplying weapons to Iran, Iran is on its way to SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDING itself against the US🇺🇸 and Israel ‘China calls for an immediate end to this war, and China applauds and very much is opposed to a war of aggression. China’s support to Iran has been unequivocal, very explicit. And this is the reason why Iran has been expressing thanks to the very strong and consistent Chinese support. China, I think, believes Iran still has enough wherewithal to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. And I don’t think there has been any specific request from Iran for Chinese military help. And this is the reality. So I’m firmly opposed to any allegation that China is supplying weapons to Iran. Iran is fully capable of defending itself because it keeps demonstrating and surprising many countries by the kind of weapons, either drones or missiles, or even missiles with a range of up to 4000 kilometres and all kinds of warheads that they can carry. And I think Iran is on its way to successfully defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity, regardless of the massive amount of losses, including loss of life, that the United States and Israel have inflicted on Iran. Iran has not requested for any military aid from China, and China does not supply weapons to a country at war.’ -Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

79,149 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

China is rewriting the AI playbook, and the US can no longer take its lead for granted. Annabelle Droulers explains. Watch more on the full episode of Bloomberg Tech: Asia:

China is rewriting the AI playbook, and the US can no longer take its lead for granted. Annabelle Droulers explains. Watch more on the full episode of Bloomberg Tech: Asia:

Bloomberg

36,225 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇨🇳🇺🇸The former US Ambassador to China, Nicolas Burns, spoke honestly about China when he was out of the office: "We've underestimated Chinese power... I think the Chinese technology, military, and economics are stronger than we think they are." He articulated his points by comparing the high-speed rail infrastructure, the number of students in science and engineering, and the strategic plans of Chinese diplomacy and military... Infrastructure: The level of infrastructure in China that America lacks is a significant strength. Number of scientists: 34% of first-year university students in China study engineering or the STEM fields, while the number in America is 5.6%. And China has a larger population. CPC is strategic: China can make big bets over 10,20,30 years without the opposing strength. So, it's easy to understand why the US is now reacting so violently to China's rare earth controls. THEY HAVE LOST THE POSITION OF STRENGTH AND THE LEVERAGE TO COERCE CHINA. Just bluffing left.

🇨🇳🇺🇸The former US Ambassador to China, Nicolas Burns, spoke honestly about China when he was out of the office: "We've underestimated Chinese power... I think the Chinese technology, military, and economics are stronger than we think they are." He articulated his points by comparing the high-speed rail infrastructure, the number of students in science and engineering, and the strategic plans of Chinese diplomacy and military... Infrastructure: The level of infrastructure in China that America lacks is a significant strength. Number of scientists: 34% of first-year university students in China study engineering or the STEM fields, while the number in America is 5.6%. And China has a larger population. CPC is strategic: China can make big bets over 10,20,30 years without the opposing strength. So, it's easy to understand why the US is now reacting so violently to China's rare earth controls. THEY HAVE LOST THE POSITION OF STRENGTH AND THE LEVERAGE TO COERCE CHINA. Just bluffing left.

Li Zexin 李泽欣

373,765 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Interesting that Mearsheimer, a longtime proponent of containing China (and, IMHO, very wrong about this), believes we're now well past the point of no return. He says that "the US cannot do much at this point to slow down Chinese economic growth" and that he "would bet that the Chinese will overcome the American effort to damage the Chinese economy more than the American economy is damaged as a result of these sanctions and tariffs", meaning that the US now hurts itself more by trying to contain China than it hurts China.

Interesting that Mearsheimer, a longtime proponent of containing China (and, IMHO, very wrong about this), believes we're now well past the point of no return. He says that "the US cannot do much at this point to slow down Chinese economic growth" and that he "would bet that the Chinese will overcome the American effort to damage the Chinese economy more than the American economy is damaged as a result of these sanctions and tariffs", meaning that the US now hurts itself more by trying to contain China than it hurts China.

Arnaud Bertrand

381,509 просмотров • 1 год назад

In 1998, the Chinese and Japanese governments issued the China-Japan Joint Declaration on Building a Partnership of Friendship and Cooperation for Peace and Development. It has an important statement — "The Japanese side continues to maintain its stand on the Taiwan question which was set forth in the Joint Statement of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Japan and reiterates its understanding that there is one China."

In 1998, the Chinese and Japanese governments issued the China-Japan Joint Declaration on Building a Partnership of Friendship and Cooperation for Peace and Development. It has an important statement — "The Japanese side continues to maintain its stand on the Taiwan question which was set forth in the Joint Statement of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Japan and reiterates its understanding that there is one China."

Ministry of National Defense of China

143,313 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Beijing, China | During his meeting with the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "We have made good progress in the past nine months for the normalisation of our bilateral relations. It is a result of the resolution of friction along the border and our ability to maintain peace and tranquillity there. This is the fundamental basis for mutual strategic trust and for the smooth development of bilateral relations. It is now incumbent on us to address other aspects related to the border, including de-escalation" (Source: MEA)

#WATCH | Beijing, China | During his meeting with the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "We have made good progress in the past nine months for the normalisation of our bilateral relations. It is a result of the resolution of friction along the border and our ability to maintain peace and tranquillity there. This is the fundamental basis for mutual strategic trust and for the smooth development of bilateral relations. It is now incumbent on us to address other aspects related to the border, including de-escalation" (Source: MEA)

ANI

11,419 просмотров • 1 год назад

Kebaso Morara is currently in China, and he is saying that a litre of petrol there is going for the equivalent of KSh 597. China is one of the countries worst hit by the Iran War, since Iran was exporting over 80% of all its oil to China.

Kebaso Morara is currently in China, and he is saying that a litre of petrol there is going for the equivalent of KSh 597. China is one of the countries worst hit by the Iran War, since Iran was exporting over 80% of all its oil to China.

The Oligarch

17,116 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In 2025, its not particularly fair to compare ANY US city to any of 100 Chinese cities. The truth is that China has just rocketed past the US, and China was going so fast, few in the USA even saw it happen.

In 2025, its not particularly fair to compare ANY US city to any of 100 Chinese cities. The truth is that China has just rocketed past the US, and China was going so fast, few in the USA even saw it happen.

Jason Smith - 上官杰文

70,204 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ Victor Gao on Iran: The END of Pax-Americana is Here, US🇺🇸 Would Exit War with China🇨🇳 a NET LOSER Why does 2026 mark the end of Pax Americana? Is war or peace inevitable between the US and China? What is Beijing’s view of the Middle East crisis unleashed by the US and Israel? All this and more on this episode of Going Underground with Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation.

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ Victor Gao on Iran: The END of Pax-Americana is Here, US🇺🇸 Would Exit War with China🇨🇳 a NET LOSER Why does 2026 mark the end of Pax Americana? Is war or peace inevitable between the US and China? What is Beijing’s view of the Middle East crisis unleashed by the US and Israel? All this and more on this episode of Going Underground with Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation.

Going Underground

210,901 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад