Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

This whole DLSS 5 Ai Discourse in a nutshell. Max has great points here, many people people got tricked into thinking it looks good but if you look at the overall picture it actually looks like Shit, this Ai Horseshit doesn't know where the light source is supposed to... show more

Tripster

1,614 subscribers

127,645 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Jensen Huang says the gamers calling DLSS 5 'AI slop' got it backward — the artist still owns every frame. Lex asked Huang about the gamers calling DLSS 5 "AI slop." Huang didn't dodge. "I don't love AI slop myself," Huang says. "All of the AI generated content increasingly looks similar, and they're all beautiful." "I'm empathetic towards what they're thinking." "That's just not what DLSS 5 is trying to do." Then he named what DLSS 5 actually is: "DLSS 5 is 3D conditioned, 3D guided. It's ground truth structure data guided." "The artist determined the geometry. We are completely truthful to the geometry." "It's conditioned by the textures, the artistry of the artist." "Every single frame, it enhances but it doesn't change anything." AI slop generates without permission. DLSS 5 generates with the artist's blueprint. Same technology. Opposite intent. P.S. I made a playbook breaking down 100+ most powerful decision making mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. 5,000+ downloads. 113 five-star reviews. Grab a free copy here: If you're new here, follow GeniusThinking for content on the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast

Jensen Huang says the gamers calling DLSS 5 'AI slop' got it backward — the artist still owns every frame. Lex asked Huang about the gamers calling DLSS 5 "AI slop." Huang didn't dodge. "I don't love AI slop myself," Huang says. "All of the AI generated content increasingly looks similar, and they're all beautiful." "I'm empathetic towards what they're thinking." "That's just not what DLSS 5 is trying to do." Then he named what DLSS 5 actually is: "DLSS 5 is 3D conditioned, 3D guided. It's ground truth structure data guided." "The artist determined the geometry. We are completely truthful to the geometry." "It's conditioned by the textures, the artistry of the artist." "Every single frame, it enhances but it doesn't change anything." AI slop generates without permission. DLSS 5 generates with the artist's blueprint. Same technology. Opposite intent. P.S. I made a playbook breaking down 100+ most powerful decision making mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. 5,000+ downloads. 113 five-star reviews. Grab a free copy here: If you're new here, follow GeniusThinking for content on the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast

GeniusThinking

13,519 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

During DLSS 5 Hands-On Video, YouTube creator Hot Hardware asked Nvidia employees this question about the computational cost of DLSS 5 when you move around in the game and it really caught my eye on how they hesitated on showing any DLSS 5 footage during motion. Every time that he moved the character, he would turn off DLSS 5 first then move to a different in-game location and then turn it on, or if DLSS 5 was turned on the movement was very slow and controlled. I know this is still work in progress, but it really begs the question "why wouldn't they show any this?" or "why show DLSS 5 this early?" I tried freezing some shots when another character is in motion to check if there are any artifacts when DLSS 5 is turned on. As suspected, I did come across some artifacts with UI elements, character popping out of the UI element and ghosting/artifacts behind the character. Its still not the best way to judge these small details that you can clearly see if a footage is recorded in-game, but then again its not like Nvidia provided any of them during DLSS 5 marketing campaign. Whenever this is still going to be present by the time DLSS 5 launches remains to be seen, however as of right now it doesn't look like it will handle fast-paced motion quite well and I don't know how well this "controlled AI-generated" rendering will scale to weaker GPUs in the RTX 50 series

During DLSS 5 Hands-On Video, YouTube creator Hot Hardware asked Nvidia employees this question about the computational cost of DLSS 5 when you move around in the game and it really caught my eye on how they hesitated on showing any DLSS 5 footage during motion. Every time that he moved the character, he would turn off DLSS 5 first then move to a different in-game location and then turn it on, or if DLSS 5 was turned on the movement was very slow and controlled. I know this is still work in progress, but it really begs the question "why wouldn't they show any this?" or "why show DLSS 5 this early?" I tried freezing some shots when another character is in motion to check if there are any artifacts when DLSS 5 is turned on. As suspected, I did come across some artifacts with UI elements, character popping out of the UI element and ghosting/artifacts behind the character. Its still not the best way to judge these small details that you can clearly see if a footage is recorded in-game, but then again its not like Nvidia provided any of them during DLSS 5 marketing campaign. Whenever this is still going to be present by the time DLSS 5 launches remains to be seen, however as of right now it doesn't look like it will handle fast-paced motion quite well and I don't know how well this "controlled AI-generated" rendering will scale to weaker GPUs in the RTX 50 series

NikTek

210,606 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This is AI but the scene of a Zombie breaking into her car and pooping in it is real. I know people this has actually happened to in LA. Be like Barbie. Find your ballot. Save LA. Good one steve johnson

This is AI but the scene of a Zombie breaking into her car and pooping in it is real. I know people this has actually happened to in LA. Be like Barbie. Find your ballot. Save LA. Good one steve johnson

Elizabeth Barcohana

33,801 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

It truly amazes me how many people will comment on my videos complaining about it being made by AI or using an AI voiceover. Frankly it's a bit insulting when the ACTUAL AI slop is stuff like this:

It truly amazes me how many people will comment on my videos complaining about it being made by AI or using an AI voiceover. Frankly it's a bit insulting when the ACTUAL AI slop is stuff like this:

ConeOfArc

14,390 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

It all started with fake frames, now its evolving onto fake graphics? Imagine if FSR, XeSS and PSSR started embracing this kind of upscaling. In the same game, you will have different looking outputs for every different upscaler because these AI models wont be trained on the same data. Grace in this case here, will look different on an Nvidia GPU using DLSS 5, she will look different using FSR, PSSR or XeSS. You get the point I don't why but I always felt that DLSS was always supposed to provide only one thing, give gamers a better framerate while retaining the same image quality as native resolution. I don't want a randomized output for a character's face that I won't recognize if I turn on DLSS 5 even if my framerate triples. Nvidia and all the game studios embracing this AI slop should take a step back in my opinion because this is not it, even if it is years away.

It all started with fake frames, now its evolving onto fake graphics? Imagine if FSR, XeSS and PSSR started embracing this kind of upscaling. In the same game, you will have different looking outputs for every different upscaler because these AI models wont be trained on the same data. Grace in this case here, will look different on an Nvidia GPU using DLSS 5, she will look different using FSR, PSSR or XeSS. You get the point I don't why but I always felt that DLSS was always supposed to provide only one thing, give gamers a better framerate while retaining the same image quality as native resolution. I don't want a randomized output for a character's face that I won't recognize if I turn on DLSS 5 even if my framerate triples. Nvidia and all the game studios embracing this AI slop should take a step back in my opinion because this is not it, even if it is years away.

NikTek

42,066 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This is why generative AI shouldn't be supported. This AI video stole one of my drawings! I don't know if the author used my drawing as an input or if the AI was trained with it, but it's disgusting.

This is why generative AI shouldn't be supported. This AI video stole one of my drawings! I don't know if the author used my drawing as an input or if the AI was trained with it, but it's disgusting.

Jobhutz

14,861 просмотров • 18 дней назад

DLSS 5 AI SLOP??

DLSS 5 AI SLOP??

PowerGPU

14,145 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Designed this site in Fable 5 with just a few prompts. And no, this is not a lame post where I attach my actual (not AI) work on an AI post to get views by making fun of a launch. This is actually Fable 5, as you can clearly see (with some of the elements that scream AI generated). But man is it doing a great job!

Designed this site in Fable 5 with just a few prompts. And no, this is not a lame post where I attach my actual (not AI) work on an AI post to get views by making fun of a launch. This is actually Fable 5, as you can clearly see (with some of the elements that scream AI generated). But man is it doing a great job!

Asaad Mahmood - The Small Square

106,914 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is what a real converting AI UGC ad looks like. I see a ton of AI UGC stuff promoted on X… most of it is goon / slop clickbait to get you to into some bs lead magnet. If you’re actually in D2C and want to learn conversion ad frameworks, use my 5.1 framework.

This is what a real converting AI UGC ad looks like. I see a ton of AI UGC stuff promoted on X… most of it is goon / slop clickbait to get you to into some bs lead magnet. If you’re actually in D2C and want to learn conversion ad frameworks, use my 5.1 framework.

Franky Shaw

58,376 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

DLSS 5 On vs DLSS 5 off Also thank you Naoyuki Ii | Commission Open for remaking that 3 years old video. No AI, just pure masterpiece.

DLSS 5 On vs DLSS 5 off Also thank you Naoyuki Ii | Commission Open for remaking that 3 years old video. No AI, just pure masterpiece.

Fiqih Hendra

71,181 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I am seriously so annoyed by all those AI haters. DLSS5 looks phenomenal; people hate on it cause „it’s AI“. That’s the sole reason.

I am seriously so annoyed by all those AI haters. DLSS5 looks phenomenal; people hate on it cause „it’s AI“. That’s the sole reason.

Chubby♨️

483,689 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Okay this is actually insane. OpenArt just dropped vibe directing and the quality doesn't look like typical AI video. You just tell what you want in chat and it builds the whole thing. 5 wild examples:

Okay this is actually insane. OpenArt just dropped vibe directing and the quality doesn't look like typical AI video. You just tell what you want in chat and it builds the whole thing. 5 wild examples:

Nav Toor

262,109 просмотров • 14 дней назад

9 out of 10 gamers will say DLSS 5 is impressive and then there's always the other person who'll call it “AI slop filter”.

9 out of 10 gamers will say DLSS 5 is impressive and then there's always the other person who'll call it “AI slop filter”.

Oliver Darko

731,022 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

NVIDIA is making it possible to speak with your voice to the AI characters of the game you're playing. It may look like picking from a NPC dialogue tree but the impressive part of this demo is that the generative AI is reacting to natural speech. Watch the full video (with sound) here: Source: The Verge

NVIDIA is making it possible to speak with your voice to the AI characters of the game you're playing. It may look like picking from a NPC dialogue tree but the impressive part of this demo is that the generative AI is reacting to natural speech. Watch the full video (with sound) here: Source: The Verge

Kris Kashtanova

50,879 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Reporter: Some are concerned NVIDIA’s DLSS 5 will make games look worse or homogeneous. In our Q&A today, Jensen Huang responded: “They’re completely wrong… you can fine tune the generative AI to your artistic style… if you want cartoon, toon shader, made of glass… it’s up to you. It’s not post processing at the frame level. It’s generative control at the geometry level. This is very different than generative AI. It’s content control generative AI.”

Reporter: Some are concerned NVIDIA’s DLSS 5 will make games look worse or homogeneous. In our Q&A today, Jensen Huang responded: “They’re completely wrong… you can fine tune the generative AI to your artistic style… if you want cartoon, toon shader, made of glass… it’s up to you. It’s not post processing at the frame level. It’s generative control at the geometry level. This is very different than generative AI. It’s content control generative AI.”

Justin Ryan ᯅ

191,313 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

How many times have you seen online arguments about AI filmmkaing devolve into the haters typing “SLOP” over and over in various un-original negative comments ? AI creators know that if your video got some decent views, the slop bots have definitely come after you. Well, this short film is for all the haters out there. I call this one,📽️💩"SLOP"💩🎬 Enjoy!!

How many times have you seen online arguments about AI filmmkaing devolve into the haters typing “SLOP” over and over in various un-original negative comments ? AI creators know that if your video got some decent views, the slop bots have definitely come after you. Well, this short film is for all the haters out there. I call this one,📽️💩"SLOP"💩🎬 Enjoy!!

GenMagnetic

42,311 просмотров • 1 год назад

The danger of AI is not just the slop, but what we lose in the process. Michael Pollan explains: "We're moving into this time where we're gonna sub out writing to AI. And AI can write our papers, and professors are dealing with this everywhere now. But what is lost is a way of thinking. Writing does something to your brain. It gives you access to things you can't know just walking around or thinking or planning or outlining. If you were just transcribing what was in your head, it would be kind of onerous. But it really is what you learn in the course of a day spent writing, things you didn't know, ideas that you didn't expect. And that's the thrill of it."

The danger of AI is not just the slop, but what we lose in the process. Michael Pollan explains: "We're moving into this time where we're gonna sub out writing to AI. And AI can write our papers, and professors are dealing with this everywhere now. But what is lost is a way of thinking. Writing does something to your brain. It gives you access to things you can't know just walking around or thinking or planning or outlining. If you were just transcribing what was in your head, it would be kind of onerous. But it really is what you learn in the course of a day spent writing, things you didn't know, ideas that you didn't expect. And that's the thrill of it."

David Perell Clips

18,445 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Sam Altman on GPT 5: "This morning I was testing our new model and I got a question. I got emailed a question that I didn't quite understand. And I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly. And I really kind of sat back in my chair and I was just like, oh man, here it is moment... I felt like useless relative to the AI in this thing that I felt like I should have been able to do and I couldn't. It was really hard. But the AI just did it like that. It was a weird feeling."

Sam Altman on GPT 5: "This morning I was testing our new model and I got a question. I got emailed a question that I didn't quite understand. And I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly. And I really kind of sat back in my chair and I was just like, oh man, here it is moment... I felt like useless relative to the AI in this thing that I felt like I should have been able to do and I couldn't. It was really hard. But the AI just did it like that. It was a weird feeling."

Chris

5,664,499 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Apparently this video has all of X in a frenzy. If it had come out before the AI era, people would be fawning over it as great art, but now they are so clicker trained that any mention of AI sends them into a verbiage frenzy and they anoint anything AI related as slop.

Apparently this video has all of X in a frenzy. If it had come out before the AI era, people would be fawning over it as great art, but now they are so clicker trained that any mention of AI sends them into a verbiage frenzy and they anoint anything AI related as slop.

Chris

2,749,308 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Maria Popova on the soul, the self, and what AI will never have: "AI will never have feeling. AI will have the simulacrum of feeling. AI will never write the great American poem, the great French poem, because it hasn't suffered. AI doesn't have the capacity to suffer. Even if you try to make it suffer, meaning write a command that is to execute failure, it'll already be succeeding at executing failure. AI can only ever succeed. And without suffering, what kind of true art can there be? All writing that is truly moving is born of feeling and time. AI has neither; it's an instantaneous, unfeeling delivery of pure information. The function of what we call the soul is real. Whatever it's made of, where it is. And the part that I worry about is that today, most people live on the level of the self and not the level of the soul. Just the costume of personality over the soul." The value of persons does not rest on our "costume of personality," but on the soul beneath it.

Maria Popova on the soul, the self, and what AI will never have: "AI will never have feeling. AI will have the simulacrum of feeling. AI will never write the great American poem, the great French poem, because it hasn't suffered. AI doesn't have the capacity to suffer. Even if you try to make it suffer, meaning write a command that is to execute failure, it'll already be succeeding at executing failure. AI can only ever succeed. And without suffering, what kind of true art can there be? All writing that is truly moving is born of feeling and time. AI has neither; it's an instantaneous, unfeeling delivery of pure information. The function of what we call the soul is real. Whatever it's made of, where it is. And the part that I worry about is that today, most people live on the level of the self and not the level of the soul. Just the costume of personality over the soul." The value of persons does not rest on our "costume of personality," but on the soul beneath it.

David Perell Clips

12,220 просмотров • 1 месяц назад