Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This will be my first and only post on this case. Observing TB, his cult followers, and the fraudulent content creators that defend him relentlessly attack both Justin and the officers in this case for simply doing their jobs reveals a lot about the difference between truth and bias.... show more

Zona Eagle

1,558 subscribers

26,269 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This match had a lot of great stuff from Starkz and James but these ~30 seconds make for a great case study about purposeful selling vs selling-for-the-sake-of-selling and I'm going to go into some detail on my thoughts about it in the next post.

This match had a lot of great stuff from Starkz and James but these ~30 seconds make for a great case study about purposeful selling vs selling-for-the-sake-of-selling and I'm going to go into some detail on my thoughts about it in the next post.

Matt D - SC

20,410 views • 8 months ago

The prosecutor, Tina Ansari, brought the case against me and reinvented HIPAA law to make it not about patient privacy but about protecting powerful institutions - TCH and BCM. These are the same institutions that were lying about mutilating and sterilizing young children in the service of the transgender ideology. She brought this case to send me to prison for a decade despite the fact that these were the same institutions that were enriching her family, the ones I was blowing the whistle on. Even though Tina was pulled from the case in complete and utter shame, the Southern District of Texas is nonetheless accelerating as if this never happened. It was corrupt from the beginning and its corrupt now. Every second this case goes on the corruption simply compounds itself.

The prosecutor, Tina Ansari, brought the case against me and reinvented HIPAA law to make it not about patient privacy but about protecting powerful institutions - TCH and BCM. These are the same institutions that were lying about mutilating and sterilizing young children in the service of the transgender ideology. She brought this case to send me to prison for a decade despite the fact that these were the same institutions that were enriching her family, the ones I was blowing the whistle on. Even though Tina was pulled from the case in complete and utter shame, the Southern District of Texas is nonetheless accelerating as if this never happened. It was corrupt from the beginning and its corrupt now. Every second this case goes on the corruption simply compounds itself.

Eithan Haim MD

43,770 views • 1 year ago

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume on today’s news that the Georgia election case against Trump has been thrown out: “It’s all part of the obstacles hurled in the path of Donald Trump as he sought the presidency the first, second and third time. A lot of it has fallen away and this case certainly deserved to.” “It was brought by a clownish prosecution team who had scandals in the middle of the case and I would add that the prosecutor who asked for the case to be dropped made the point that it’s not illegal to challenge the results of an election. So it was a misbegotten prosecution from the jump and there’s very little left of the lawfare that was brought against President Trump. I think that’s a good thing.”

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume on today’s news that the Georgia election case against Trump has been thrown out: “It’s all part of the obstacles hurled in the path of Donald Trump as he sought the presidency the first, second and third time. A lot of it has fallen away and this case certainly deserved to.” “It was brought by a clownish prosecution team who had scandals in the middle of the case and I would add that the prosecutor who asked for the case to be dropped made the point that it’s not illegal to challenge the results of an election. So it was a misbegotten prosecution from the jump and there’s very little left of the lawfare that was brought against President Trump. I think that’s a good thing.”

TV News Now

67,489 views • 8 months ago

Prince Harry doesn’t seem to have a good grasp or concept of what justice is and how it plays out in the judicial system. He seems to believe that the defense has no right to defend itself and that no matter the case the defense should just roll over so “justice” as Harry believes can take place. Maybe that’s how it should play out in Harry’s fantasy but it’s simply not reality. Those parents should expect the defense, in this case Meta and Google, to dig through their lives to try and find every crack in the plaintiff’s case to exploit. That’s what attorneys do, and Harry should know as his lawyers allegedly threatened to harm a witness in his case. It’s, to use Harry’s phrase, “bonkers” to say that essentially the defense is evil for defending itself as it’s the very foundation of our judicial system. A fair and just trial means that each side gets to share the facts as they see them, regardless of how damaging it is to the families.

Prince Harry doesn’t seem to have a good grasp or concept of what justice is and how it plays out in the judicial system. He seems to believe that the defense has no right to defend itself and that no matter the case the defense should just roll over so “justice” as Harry believes can take place. Maybe that’s how it should play out in Harry’s fantasy but it’s simply not reality. Those parents should expect the defense, in this case Meta and Google, to dig through their lives to try and find every crack in the plaintiff’s case to exploit. That’s what attorneys do, and Harry should know as his lawyers allegedly threatened to harm a witness in his case. It’s, to use Harry’s phrase, “bonkers” to say that essentially the defense is evil for defending itself as it’s the very foundation of our judicial system. A fair and just trial means that each side gets to share the facts as they see them, regardless of how damaging it is to the families.

Royal News Network

60,314 views • 5 months ago

Candace has some issues coming with the Harpole case. Here is Nicholas Brooks, who is a lawyer breaks it all down. I’ve watched many of his videos for the Macron case. He isn’t bias. And this case Candace should be very worried about. Believe me she’s not excited about discovery and will try to get it dismissed as she did the Macron case. The first video is what the lawsuit is about. Harpole is suing Candace for defamation due to her saying he conspired with the US government, the assassinate Charlie Kirk. The second video explains the allegations and how the laws in Tennessee work regarding the allegations. The third which is really good lays out how Candace knowingly stated Harpole could be at the meeting even though she was in possession of the flight logs showing he couldn’t be there. She lied to her audience. And fourth and the best one is what happens next. Candace will file to dismiss. How will she explain that one to her fans? And this video shows why dismissal won’t be successful and that discovery is the last thing she wants. Every text and email of hers will have to be put in discovery regarding this. And how her company operates to get information. The entire video is here and I urge you to watch it. He goes into full detail why this case is not a case that Owens can win.

Candace has some issues coming with the Harpole case. Here is Nicholas Brooks, who is a lawyer breaks it all down. I’ve watched many of his videos for the Macron case. He isn’t bias. And this case Candace should be very worried about. Believe me she’s not excited about discovery and will try to get it dismissed as she did the Macron case. The first video is what the lawsuit is about. Harpole is suing Candace for defamation due to her saying he conspired with the US government, the assassinate Charlie Kirk. The second video explains the allegations and how the laws in Tennessee work regarding the allegations. The third which is really good lays out how Candace knowingly stated Harpole could be at the meeting even though she was in possession of the flight logs showing he couldn’t be there. She lied to her audience. And fourth and the best one is what happens next. Candace will file to dismiss. How will she explain that one to her fans? And this video shows why dismissal won’t be successful and that discovery is the last thing she wants. Every text and email of hers will have to be put in discovery regarding this. And how her company operates to get information. The entire video is here and I urge you to watch it. He goes into full detail why this case is not a case that Owens can win.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

48,218 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Hyderabad: Telangana Jagruthi President K Kavitha says, "I have 100 times said that we have nothing to do with this case. This is a politically motivated case. As a part of political vendetta, this case has been put on the Opposition parties and I am thankful to the judiciary that they have upheld our faith in the judiciary of this country. Today, judiciary has cut through this entire web of lies...I am very thankful to everybody who stood by me in that difficult situation...Truth has triumphed. Truth can be hidden, but it can never be defeated...Not only me, KCR garu himself has time and again said that this is a vendetta on BRS and KCR garu that has been reflected on Kavitha. I have said that this is a false case, a politically motivated case...Who will account for the time that I lost with my kids? Who will account for the time that I lost with my family?"

#WATCH | Hyderabad: Telangana Jagruthi President K Kavitha says, "I have 100 times said that we have nothing to do with this case. This is a politically motivated case. As a part of political vendetta, this case has been put on the Opposition parties and I am thankful to the judiciary that they have upheld our faith in the judiciary of this country. Today, judiciary has cut through this entire web of lies...I am very thankful to everybody who stood by me in that difficult situation...Truth has triumphed. Truth can be hidden, but it can never be defeated...Not only me, KCR garu himself has time and again said that this is a vendetta on BRS and KCR garu that has been reflected on Kavitha. I have said that this is a false case, a politically motivated case...Who will account for the time that I lost with my kids? Who will account for the time that I lost with my family?"

ANI

56,116 views • 5 months ago

“The important thing I want to stress to you is how abnormal it is that the prosecution—Erika’s team—is arguing against a continuance. I am perpetually involved in lawsuits. Continuances are basically like common courtesies…” lol Candace is RETARDED. The prosecution isn’t “Erika’s team.” The prosecution represents the state. Erika didn’t hire these lawyers, and they don’t represent her. Utah has special victims rights, and she’s listed as the victim in this case because she’s next-of-kin to the man who was murdered. It’s not “her team.” Plus, it is WILD to compare Candace’s defamation lawsuits to a homicide case. There is literally no comparison. She’s never been involved in a murder case, and she has no idea what she’s talking about. She cannot be this stupid.

“The important thing I want to stress to you is how abnormal it is that the prosecution—Erika’s team—is arguing against a continuance. I am perpetually involved in lawsuits. Continuances are basically like common courtesies…” lol Candace is RETARDED. The prosecution isn’t “Erika’s team.” The prosecution represents the state. Erika didn’t hire these lawyers, and they don’t represent her. Utah has special victims rights, and she’s listed as the victim in this case because she’s next-of-kin to the man who was murdered. It’s not “her team.” Plus, it is WILD to compare Candace’s defamation lawsuits to a homicide case. There is literally no comparison. She’s never been involved in a murder case, and she has no idea what she’s talking about. She cannot be this stupid.

Natalie Jean Beisner

78,675 views • 3 months ago

I think Candace last night setup her excuse for asking for a dismissal. That I don’t think she will get. In these two videos she explains she has to plead her case to her husband to not file for a dismissal. The first she has to “plead her case” with Georgie not to. The second video she says she knows he’s going to say to because it’s expensive and George folds and will not want to fight it. George is more sensible. So it’s going to be my husband over rode me. Just my opinion and I’ve been wrong before but I think she will say George wants her to file for dismissal on these grounds. Any thoughts?

I think Candace last night setup her excuse for asking for a dismissal. That I don’t think she will get. In these two videos she explains she has to plead her case to her husband to not file for a dismissal. The first she has to “plead her case” with Georgie not to. The second video she says she knows he’s going to say to because it’s expensive and George folds and will not want to fight it. George is more sensible. So it’s going to be my husband over rode me. Just my opinion and I’ve been wrong before but I think she will say George wants her to file for dismissal on these grounds. Any thoughts?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

35,702 views • 2 months ago

I really REALLY don’t want to continue this. But it’s only fair that I get a chance to respond to this nonsense and clear it up … Her true nature and why she’s doing what she’s doing is GLARINGLY obvious. In this clip she criticizes me for pointing out the fact that what she did to Baker was not ok. And according to her logic, when she tried to destroy Baker’s reputation and image for content, he should’ve just “taken it on the chin” because when I posted something about her throwing Aidan, me, Jimmy, and Nurse Kim under the bus about some stupid bullshit recording, she “took it on the chin” and didn’t say anything because she’s a “team player”. This is cult mentality. And it’s dangerous because it’s in our own community and she’s a respected voice in it. In summary, since she is close to Aidan, she gets a free pass to shit on everyone in the community. If one of us who is close to Aidan and criticizes another who is close to Aidan, that other person should just “take it on the chin”. But if someone who is close to Aidan criticizes (or even lies) about someone who’s not close to Aidan (or not AS close), that person should just take it on the chin. So if you’re not a content creator or ESPECIALLY if you’re not a content creator who’s close to Aidan, those of us who are, totally get to shit all over you and you’re just gonna have to “take it on the chin and be a team player”.

I really REALLY don’t want to continue this. But it’s only fair that I get a chance to respond to this nonsense and clear it up … Her true nature and why she’s doing what she’s doing is GLARINGLY obvious. In this clip she criticizes me for pointing out the fact that what she did to Baker was not ok. And according to her logic, when she tried to destroy Baker’s reputation and image for content, he should’ve just “taken it on the chin” because when I posted something about her throwing Aidan, me, Jimmy, and Nurse Kim under the bus about some stupid bullshit recording, she “took it on the chin” and didn’t say anything because she’s a “team player”. This is cult mentality. And it’s dangerous because it’s in our own community and she’s a respected voice in it. In summary, since she is close to Aidan, she gets a free pass to shit on everyone in the community. If one of us who is close to Aidan and criticizes another who is close to Aidan, that other person should just “take it on the chin”. But if someone who is close to Aidan criticizes (or even lies) about someone who’s not close to Aidan (or not AS close), that person should just take it on the chin. So if you’re not a content creator or ESPECIALLY if you’re not a content creator who’s close to Aidan, those of us who are, totally get to shit all over you and you’re just gonna have to “take it on the chin and be a team player”.

El Jafel

35,830 views • 1 month ago

Life and death are in the power of the tongue… In this case, the girlfriend has a right to see what she wants but as soon as The man just has a little fun and he’s condemned . This woman is literally oblivious to the damage that she has wrought.

Life and death are in the power of the tongue… In this case, the girlfriend has a right to see what she wants but as soon as The man just has a little fun and he’s condemned . This woman is literally oblivious to the damage that she has wrought.

A Gene Robinson

97,034 views • 1 year ago

Some community members made a Solana token for Tibane and went on pushing this on then gave me a share of the tokens and 100% of the trade fees. I liked seeing a generation learning about the MtGox case and all the lore that comes around it, from Tibane's own life (which is itself not standard) to Russian hackers and everything surrounding this whole case. I'll be donating part of the fees to feline CKD research in hope this helps other cats and their owners to not go through the same thing. DRtvTCzfiKGhCVREmBbZdN9sB8PHeq9KdRZ3VmFhpump

Some community members made a Solana token for Tibane and went on pushing this on then gave me a share of the tokens and 100% of the trade fees. I liked seeing a generation learning about the MtGox case and all the lore that comes around it, from Tibane's own life (which is itself not standard) to Russian hackers and everything surrounding this whole case. I'll be donating part of the fees to feline CKD research in hope this helps other cats and their owners to not go through the same thing. DRtvTCzfiKGhCVREmBbZdN9sB8PHeq9KdRZ3VmFhpump

Mark Karpelès

86,336 views • 5 months ago

Nick Fuentes gives Candace Owens credit for being against the war, but says he is giving the best analysis of the Iran war for a reason. His last few episodes have been phenomenal. And shockingly, he’s been on time. “No one else is saying it like this…it’s jews. They’re doing it on the jewish holiday of Purim against the Persians, their mortal enemy. They’re calling them Amalekites. It’s straight out of the Old Testament.” “That’s just rhetoric. They would like that to be the case, but it isn’t. This is the only show that will talk about the jewishness of all this, from where all this comes.” “Everybody’s either lying, afraid, or misinformed. Not the Khazarians, not the Masons, it’s not just Netanyahu…only this show is going to tell you the power matrix that has brought us to this war.” “It makes me fear for my life…it’s a bit terrifying.”

Nick Fuentes gives Candace Owens credit for being against the war, but says he is giving the best analysis of the Iran war for a reason. His last few episodes have been phenomenal. And shockingly, he’s been on time. “No one else is saying it like this…it’s jews. They’re doing it on the jewish holiday of Purim against the Persians, their mortal enemy. They’re calling them Amalekites. It’s straight out of the Old Testament.” “That’s just rhetoric. They would like that to be the case, but it isn’t. This is the only show that will talk about the jewishness of all this, from where all this comes.” “Everybody’s either lying, afraid, or misinformed. Not the Khazarians, not the Masons, it’s not just Netanyahu…only this show is going to tell you the power matrix that has brought us to this war.” “It makes me fear for my life…it’s a bit terrifying.”

Fractured Light

145,229 views • 4 months ago

God bless Sarah Fields for all her amazing coverage on this Karmelo Anthony case and all the back lash she has taken for it. I don’t normally recommend people to follow, but she’s definitely earned a special shoutout for her work on this case.

God bless Sarah Fields for all her amazing coverage on this Karmelo Anthony case and all the back lash she has taken for it. I don’t normally recommend people to follow, but she’s definitely earned a special shoutout for her work on this case.

Derrick Evans

29,033 views • 1 month ago

“So far you haven’t connected it to the assassination in any way whatsoever…” Exactly this. And it’s not just true for Fort Huachucha and Mitch Snow; it’s true of everything—every thread she’s chased and rabbit hole she’s gone down has led…nowhere. We’re four months into this, and Candace has proven nothing as it pertains to Charlie’s assassination. Indeed, the only verifiable thing she’s proven is that two days before his death, Charlie sent a PRIVATE text that indicated at least some waning of support for Israel. What was actually in his heart and mind at that moment and how much he meant it, we’ll sadly never know. He proceeded to do absolutely nothing about this apparent huge shift in position—didn’t tweet it, didn’t talk about it on his show or publicly at all. So how much did he really mean that text that he never imagined the world would see? We don’t know. The only one who might is Mrs. Charlie Kirk. But regardless and more to the point: Candace has yet to prove that even that—that singular fact in this entire investigation that she’s actually proven—had ANYTHING to do with Charlie’s murder. She hasn’t definitively had verifiably connected it at all. And the speaker here is right—people lose their minds and chase their tails and go down these rabbit holes over every crazy thing Candace brings up, over whether Mitch is credible or whatever nonsense about Egyptian planes, but…not a single shred of it is verifiably connected to what happened to Charlie. Things being weird or anomalous to you isn’t proof they’re connected to someone’s murder. Weird and anomalous things happen around us literally everyday. Additionally, this was an apt point and a sound question, and Candace gets obviously and visibly pissed and just cuts him off, not bothering to address his actual point at all. But you know what she does bother to do? Reference her “feelings” for the ukpteenth time—“I have a feeling about this meeting.” Ok, babe. Let us know when you get a period too or a bad bout of diarrhea. She pretends to not be a feminist, but then she expects us all to hang on her feelings. It’s absurd.

“So far you haven’t connected it to the assassination in any way whatsoever…” Exactly this. And it’s not just true for Fort Huachucha and Mitch Snow; it’s true of everything—every thread she’s chased and rabbit hole she’s gone down has led…nowhere. We’re four months into this, and Candace has proven nothing as it pertains to Charlie’s assassination. Indeed, the only verifiable thing she’s proven is that two days before his death, Charlie sent a PRIVATE text that indicated at least some waning of support for Israel. What was actually in his heart and mind at that moment and how much he meant it, we’ll sadly never know. He proceeded to do absolutely nothing about this apparent huge shift in position—didn’t tweet it, didn’t talk about it on his show or publicly at all. So how much did he really mean that text that he never imagined the world would see? We don’t know. The only one who might is Mrs. Charlie Kirk. But regardless and more to the point: Candace has yet to prove that even that—that singular fact in this entire investigation that she’s actually proven—had ANYTHING to do with Charlie’s murder. She hasn’t definitively had verifiably connected it at all. And the speaker here is right—people lose their minds and chase their tails and go down these rabbit holes over every crazy thing Candace brings up, over whether Mitch is credible or whatever nonsense about Egyptian planes, but…not a single shred of it is verifiably connected to what happened to Charlie. Things being weird or anomalous to you isn’t proof they’re connected to someone’s murder. Weird and anomalous things happen around us literally everyday. Additionally, this was an apt point and a sound question, and Candace gets obviously and visibly pissed and just cuts him off, not bothering to address his actual point at all. But you know what she does bother to do? Reference her “feelings” for the ukpteenth time—“I have a feeling about this meeting.” Ok, babe. Let us know when you get a period too or a bad bout of diarrhea. She pretends to not be a feminist, but then she expects us all to hang on her feelings. It’s absurd.

Natalie Jean Beisner

19,647 views • 6 months ago

Let me just be clear about what this case is and why its cover up is so disturbing. The President is engaged in a direct cover up of crimes and refusing to release the Epstein Files. What I take from his efforts is a desperate attempt to bend the law and bend the truth—even if that means turning on members of his own party, just as he has this week. It’s time to release the files.

Let me just be clear about what this case is and why its cover up is so disturbing. The President is engaged in a direct cover up of crimes and refusing to release the Epstein Files. What I take from his efforts is a desperate attempt to bend the law and bend the truth—even if that means turning on members of his own party, just as he has this week. It’s time to release the files.

Rep. Melanie Stansbury

132,549 views • 8 months ago

Blair Cottrell posts a follow up video explaining how the first person to break ranks and publicly criticise the hate crimes legislation is a Labor Party MP from NSW. The MP is also a Barrister, and he says how he thinks WAP will win their High Court case and be launched into politics. Very good video and Blair is right to criticise One Nation who have been silent on the case. This case is at the forefront of freedom of speech and freedom of political expression for the nation. As Blair says, everyone should be talking about this.

Blair Cottrell posts a follow up video explaining how the first person to break ranks and publicly criticise the hate crimes legislation is a Labor Party MP from NSW. The MP is also a Barrister, and he says how he thinks WAP will win their High Court case and be launched into politics. Very good video and Blair is right to criticise One Nation who have been silent on the case. This case is at the forefront of freedom of speech and freedom of political expression for the nation. As Blair says, everyone should be talking about this.

Lone Patriot

13,482 views • 1 month ago

Honored to be working with Gerald “Prince” Miller and his team to provide a platform that will shed light on numerous instances of injustices and constitutional violations that happened not only in his case, but the many people he will be talking to, he recently spoke with his uncle Kenneth “Supreme” McGriff about his case as well as the documentary he just released

Honored to be working with Gerald “Prince” Miller and his team to provide a platform that will shed light on numerous instances of injustices and constitutional violations that happened not only in his case, but the many people he will be talking to, he recently spoke with his uncle Kenneth “Supreme” McGriff about his case as well as the documentary he just released

Rory

74,972 views • 9 months ago

She needed the ER… and her husband said it was “inconvenient.” Let that sink in. She’s in pain, scared enough to call for help, and the one person who’s supposed to show up for her says it’s not worth the trouble. So she calls someone else. Not a stranger… but not her husband either. And in that moment, everything changes. Because you don’t forget who shows up when it matters, and who doesn’t. It’s never just about that one moment. It reveals everything about priorities, care, and what someone truly means to you. Is this something you could forgive… or is that the moment the relationship is over?

Sensitive content

She needed the ER… and her husband said it was “inconvenient.” Let that sink in. She’s in pain, scared enough to call for help, and the one person who’s supposed to show up for her says it’s not worth the trouble. So she calls someone else. Not a stranger… but not her husband either. And in that moment, everything changes. Because you don’t forget who shows up when it matters, and who doesn’t. It’s never just about that one moment. It reveals everything about priorities, care, and what someone truly means to you. Is this something you could forgive… or is that the moment the relationship is over?

Dr. CZ

54,870 views • 3 months ago