Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This woman got a digital receipt from Walmart, which is an option. Now, because of a glitch, the store is saying she didn’t pay, and she can’t prove she did. Should they do away with digital-only receipts so this doesn’t happen? It’s got to be frustrating if it’s true.

288,691 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A shopper paid at Walmart, chose a digital receipt, and then couldn’t get the doors or app to cooperate. She asked for help. A Walmart associate wouldn’t let her leave. A bystander walked up and told the officer/security that there was still an “outstanding balance” / that she hadn’t paid. The officer repeated that line to her face: he didn’t think she paid. She pushed back that the woman wasn’t even there when she checked out, that Walmart offers the digital option so a paper receipt failing to load isn’t her fault, and that being walked over and told she stole her own groceries was humiliating. Staff later pulled cameras and transactions. She had paid. When she asked for an apology, the officer said no and “good night.” That’s the clip: paid customer, broken digital proof, a stranger’s accusation treated as fact, confirmation she was right, zero apology. Walmart is not Costco or Sam’s Club. There is no membership contract that makes a receipt check a condition of shopping. In most states the door check is a request. Shopkeeper’s privilege only lets them detain you if they have reasonable suspicion of actual theft — a refused receipt check by itself usually isn’t that. Their own training has been reported as “if they walk past, let them go.” Should people stop and show the receipt because it’s faster and keeps the peace, or walk past because they can? Does this guard owe her an apology?

DocumentingLibs

224,323 просмотров • 12 дней назад