Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Thomas Massie just declared: “Americans are under attack.” Monsanto is “attacking our executive branch, our legislative branch at the state level, our legislative branch here in Washington, and the courts.” “They want get-out-of-court free cards.” “My colleague, Chellie Pingree and I … have offered legislation called the No Immunity...

Holden_Culotta's profile picture

Holden Culotta

153,833 subscribers

72,371 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Thomas Massie warns Americans are at war as the Supreme Court decides whether Bayer will be granted immunity from harm caused by its products. “Americans are under attack.” “There are four fronts to this war.” “They're attacking our executive branch, our legislative branch at the state level, our legislative branch here in Washington, D.C., and the courts. “What do they want? They want get-out-of-court-free cards.” “We’re not going to give it to them.” “We’ve offered legislation called the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.” “But it shouldn't even be necessary.” “We haven't repealed the 10th Amendment.” “We haven't repealed the 7th Fifth Amendment, your right to a jury trial.” “We haven't repealed the First Amendment.” “These things have not been repealed, but are in jeopardy today.” “This is regulatory capture.” “It is corrupt.” “The federal government, and especially the executive branch, do not have this power to issue these get out of court free cards, and we're going to fight it.” Thomas Massie
2:06

Thomas Massie warns Americans are at war as the Supreme Court decides whether Bayer will be granted immunity from harm caused by its products. “Americans are under attack.” “There are four fronts to this war.” “They're attacking our executive branch, our legislative branch at the state level, our legislative branch here in Washington, D.C., and the courts. “What do they want? They want get-out-of-court-free cards.” “We’re not going to give it to them.” “We’ve offered legislation called the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.” “But it shouldn't even be necessary.” “We haven't repealed the 10th Amendment.” “We haven't repealed the 7th Fifth Amendment, your right to a jury trial.” “We haven't repealed the First Amendment.” “These things have not been repealed, but are in jeopardy today.” “This is regulatory capture.” “It is corrupt.” “The federal government, and especially the executive branch, do not have this power to issue these get out of court free cards, and we're going to fight it.” Thomas Massie

End Tribalism in Politics

15,141 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Thomas Massie Sounds the Alarm on Glyphosate Immunity 🚨 Our own Cara Castronuova interviewed Thomas Massie - and what he revealed should have every American paying attention. A foreign corporation (German giant Bayer/Monsanto) is ATTACKING Americans on four fronts - federal legislation, state legislation, the executive branch, AND the courts. And the worst part? This administration is siding with them. Here's what's BURIED in the FARM BILL moving through Congress RIGHT NOW - a provision that would give Bayer complete immunity from lawsuits over glyphosate (Roundup) - the herbicide that juries have repeatedly found causes harm to real people. Rep. Massie and Rep. Congresswoman Chellie Pingree are fighting back with the "No Immunity for Glyphosate" bill. "Do juries get to decide or do bureaucrats get to hand out get-out-of-court-free cards to corporations?" - Rep. Massie ⬇️ Share this. People need to know.
5:03

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Thomas Massie Sounds the Alarm on Glyphosate Immunity 🚨 Our own Cara Castronuova interviewed Thomas Massie - and what he revealed should have every American paying attention. A foreign corporation (German giant Bayer/Monsanto) is ATTACKING Americans on four fronts - federal legislation, state legislation, the executive branch, AND the courts. And the worst part? This administration is siding with them. Here's what's BURIED in the FARM BILL moving through Congress RIGHT NOW - a provision that would give Bayer complete immunity from lawsuits over glyphosate (Roundup) - the herbicide that juries have repeatedly found causes harm to real people. Rep. Massie and Rep. Congresswoman Chellie Pingree are fighting back with the "No Immunity for Glyphosate" bill. "Do juries get to decide or do bureaucrats get to hand out get-out-of-court-free cards to corporations?" - Rep. Massie ⬇️ Share this. People need to know.

LindellTV

247,744 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Thomas Massie at the Supreme Court this morning: “The White House Chief of Staff worked for a lobbying firm that accepted money from Monsanto / Bayer and that is wrong.”
0:23

Thomas Massie at the Supreme Court this morning: “The White House Chief of Staff worked for a lobbying firm that accepted money from Monsanto / Bayer and that is wrong.”

PatriotTakes 🇺🇸

413,339 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Thomas Massie just declared: “This government is under siege.” And he exposed Susie Wiles and Pam Bondi for taking “millions of dollars from Bayer.” “All three branches of this government are under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named Bayer.” “They spent over $9 million lobbying … so that they don’t have to be liable for any damages their herbicide Roundup causes.” “The Constitution guarantees people a trial if they’ve been harmed.” “Why are we contemplating going against the Constitution?” “The Attorney General has opined favorably for this German company in front of the Supreme Court about getting rid of any liability that they should have for any damages.” “By the way, the President’s Chief of Staff and the President’s Attorney General worked for one of the biggest lobbying firms that’s received millions of dollars from Bayer.” “Maybe that’s why we’ve seen an executive order that says that the production of this chemical from this German company is a national defense priority.” “And we know why they’re doing that.” “It’s to keep them from having any liability.” “This is wrong.” “We shouldn’t succumb to the lobbyists, not in the executive branch, not in the judicial branch, and certainly not here in Congress.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress
1:51

Thomas Massie just declared: “This government is under siege.” And he exposed Susie Wiles and Pam Bondi for taking “millions of dollars from Bayer.” “All three branches of this government are under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named Bayer.” “They spent over $9 million lobbying … so that they don’t have to be liable for any damages their herbicide Roundup causes.” “The Constitution guarantees people a trial if they’ve been harmed.” “Why are we contemplating going against the Constitution?” “The Attorney General has opined favorably for this German company in front of the Supreme Court about getting rid of any liability that they should have for any damages.” “By the way, the President’s Chief of Staff and the President’s Attorney General worked for one of the biggest lobbying firms that’s received millions of dollars from Bayer.” “Maybe that’s why we’ve seen an executive order that says that the production of this chemical from this German company is a national defense priority.” “And we know why they’re doing that.” “It’s to keep them from having any liability.” “This is wrong.” “We shouldn’t succumb to the lobbyists, not in the executive branch, not in the judicial branch, and certainly not here in Congress.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

1,098,103 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“We have to fight like hell.” “No Republican or Democrat can tell you they support MAHA if they vote for chemicals.” Democrat Rep. Chellie Pingree just partnered with Thomas Massie to block Congress from giving Monsanto immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “Bayer is spending millions of dollars lobbying Congress.” “They care about their corporate bottom line, and that is it.” “If their product makes you sick, they don’t want to pay up and they don’t want to take responsibility.” “They have the money, but we have the people.” “Bayer is back, this time with the full-throated support of the Trump administration at the Supreme Court.” “This administration unfortunately has supported this appeal at the Supreme Court.” “And right now, the other fight we’re in today is that Bayer got Republicans to jam this liability shield into the farm.” “This should not be a partisan issue.” “I have been an organic farmer in Maine since the 1970s.” “No one can tell me or the other farmers here today that we can’t grow food without all of these toxic chemicals.” “Today … the [House] Rules Committee will decide whether the Amendment I co-sponsor with Rep. Massie … will even be allowed for a vote on the house floor.” “It takes the Bayer immunity language out of the Farm Bill, and it lets state and local governments decide how pesticides are used in their community.” “Any Farm Bill that protects chemical companies over American farm families is not pro-farmer.” “It’s not pro-health.” “It’s not pro-America.” “It’s a giveaway to Big Chemical.” Congresswoman Chellie Pingree Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress
4:29

“We have to fight like hell.” “No Republican or Democrat can tell you they support MAHA if they vote for chemicals.” Democrat Rep. Chellie Pingree just partnered with Thomas Massie to block Congress from giving Monsanto immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “Bayer is spending millions of dollars lobbying Congress.” “They care about their corporate bottom line, and that is it.” “If their product makes you sick, they don’t want to pay up and they don’t want to take responsibility.” “They have the money, but we have the people.” “Bayer is back, this time with the full-throated support of the Trump administration at the Supreme Court.” “This administration unfortunately has supported this appeal at the Supreme Court.” “And right now, the other fight we’re in today is that Bayer got Republicans to jam this liability shield into the farm.” “This should not be a partisan issue.” “I have been an organic farmer in Maine since the 1970s.” “No one can tell me or the other farmers here today that we can’t grow food without all of these toxic chemicals.” “Today … the [House] Rules Committee will decide whether the Amendment I co-sponsor with Rep. Massie … will even be allowed for a vote on the house floor.” “It takes the Bayer immunity language out of the Farm Bill, and it lets state and local governments decide how pesticides are used in their community.” “Any Farm Bill that protects chemical companies over American farm families is not pro-farmer.” “It’s not pro-health.” “It’s not pro-America.” “It’s a giveaway to Big Chemical.” Congresswoman Chellie Pingree Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

39,194 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Thomas Massie just delivered an urgent call to action: “Americans are under attack by a German company.” Bayer-Monsanto. “People this week should be calling their congressmen … and saying, take the glyphosate immunity out of the Farm Bill.” “It’s poison.” “This administration has sided with the German company trying to get immunity from the harm that their products may cause.” “Chellie Pingree and I … are trying to get them to strip the immunity for glyphosate that they’ve put into the Farm Bill.” “Bayer’s product has become unprofitable because of the harm that state juries have decided has been caused to people.” “And there’s something broader though than just glyphosate here.” “This would set a precedent for every pesticide, every herbicide, every insecticide.” “It would set a precedent that the EPA doesn’t exist to protect people and the environment.” “It exists to give get-out-of-court-free cards to corporations.” Thomas Massie for Congress Thomas Massie LindellTV
5:00

Thomas Massie just delivered an urgent call to action: “Americans are under attack by a German company.” Bayer-Monsanto. “People this week should be calling their congressmen … and saying, take the glyphosate immunity out of the Farm Bill.” “It’s poison.” “This administration has sided with the German company trying to get immunity from the harm that their products may cause.” “Chellie Pingree and I … are trying to get them to strip the immunity for glyphosate that they’ve put into the Farm Bill.” “Bayer’s product has become unprofitable because of the harm that state juries have decided has been caused to people.” “And there’s something broader though than just glyphosate here.” “This would set a precedent for every pesticide, every herbicide, every insecticide.” “It would set a precedent that the EPA doesn’t exist to protect people and the environment.” “It exists to give get-out-of-court-free cards to corporations.” Thomas Massie for Congress Thomas Massie LindellTV

Holden Culotta

442,860 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨REP. THOMAS MASSIE: "All three branches of this government is under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named BAYER." "They spent over $9 million lobbying the executive branch and the legislative branch so that they don't have to be liable for any damages that their herbicide causes, otherwise known as ROUNDUP." Thomas Massie
0:22

🚨REP. THOMAS MASSIE: "All three branches of this government is under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named BAYER." "They spent over $9 million lobbying the executive branch and the legislative branch so that they don't have to be liable for any damages that their herbicide causes, otherwise known as ROUNDUP." Thomas Massie

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

37,177 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Thomas Massie just said the quiet part out loud: “This government is under siege.” Bayer is waging war on our rights, our Constitution, and MAHA. Bayer is a foreign company—and they’re demanding legal immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. We’re fighting back. Here’s how: Massie reminded his colleagues on the House floor that “the Constitution guarantees people a trial if they’ve been harmed.” “Everybody in this country deserves their day in court.” This right needs to be preserved at all costs. We are not demanding that glyphosate be eliminated overnight. We are not telling farmers how to farm. We are demanding that the Republicans preserve our fundamental right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us. We are demanding that Republicans uphold the promises they made to MAHA voters in 2024. Massie revealed that Bayer has spent “over $9 million” lobbying Congress and the White House for legal immunity from lawsuits over “any damages that their herbicide causes.” We need all hands on deck to fight back. Use the link below for a step-by-step guide on how you can take action in just 2 minutes:🧵
1:49

Thomas Massie just said the quiet part out loud: “This government is under siege.” Bayer is waging war on our rights, our Constitution, and MAHA. Bayer is a foreign company—and they’re demanding legal immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. We’re fighting back. Here’s how: Massie reminded his colleagues on the House floor that “the Constitution guarantees people a trial if they’ve been harmed.” “Everybody in this country deserves their day in court.” This right needs to be preserved at all costs. We are not demanding that glyphosate be eliminated overnight. We are not telling farmers how to farm. We are demanding that the Republicans preserve our fundamental right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us. We are demanding that Republicans uphold the promises they made to MAHA voters in 2024. Massie revealed that Bayer has spent “over $9 million” lobbying Congress and the White House for legal immunity from lawsuits over “any damages that their herbicide causes.” We need all hands on deck to fight back. Use the link below for a step-by-step guide on how you can take action in just 2 minutes:🧵

Stand for Health Freedom

56,485 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
0:47

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

1,005,022 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Attorney General Liz Murrill and I are at the Supreme Court today continuing the fight for our First Amendment rights! When the federal government silences American’s speech because they disagree with it—that is a clear violation of our First Amendment. #SCOTUS
1:03

Attorney General Liz Murrill and I are at the Supreme Court today continuing the fight for our First Amendment rights! When the federal government silences American’s speech because they disagree with it—that is a clear violation of our First Amendment. #SCOTUS

Governor Jeff Landry

12,520 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee
1:14

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee

Patrick McGreal

10,936 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Thomas Massie on the 2nd Amendment: "Our chief executive of this country would do well to understand what the second Amendment is really about. It is about keeping an overzealous executive in check. It is about securing all the other liberties in this Constitution. It is about the patriots who are willing to tell the government 'We are in charge!'"
0:28

Thomas Massie on the 2nd Amendment: "Our chief executive of this country would do well to understand what the second Amendment is really about. It is about keeping an overzealous executive in check. It is about securing all the other liberties in this Constitution. It is about the patriots who are willing to tell the government 'We are in charge!'"

MAHA PAC🗽

141,717 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

James Carville: “The Supreme Court frankly is a corrupt branch of government. The Democrats are going to have to deal with that in 2029 when they take office”
1:31

James Carville: “The Supreme Court frankly is a corrupt branch of government. The Democrats are going to have to deal with that in 2029 when they take office”

Marco Foster

58,029 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Thomas Massie and Lauren Boebert just declared war on the mass surveillance state. “FISA 702 is just the tip of the iceberg … ” “There have been so many erosions of our Fourth Amendment right to privacy.” “The Bank Secrecy Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Patriot Act … all of them created so-called loopholes in the Constitution.” “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act … is used to go after Americans.” “I’ve been in a SCIF last week where I saw two secret rulings … of how the government has created additional loopholes to spy on you that I’m not even allowed to tell you.” “And finally, the third-party doctrine.” “It’s based on a ruling of the Supreme Court … I think it was a bad ruling, but it’s been expanded in its interpretation to include things like doctor’s appointment records, bank records, phone records … Flock cameras.” “Imagine … that you turn AI loose on these databases.” “Now, there’s virtually nothing the government can’t know about you without a warrant.” “That is why we’ve created … the Surveillance Accountability Act.” “It closes these loopholes that I’ve explained.” “And more importantly, it creates a private right of action.” “It’s almost impossible to sue federal government employees if they infringe on your constitutional rights.” “The second half of this bill gives you the right to sue the government employee.” “If they infringe on your constitutional rights, they could be privately and personally sued for that.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress Lauren Boebert
3:38

Thomas Massie and Lauren Boebert just declared war on the mass surveillance state. “FISA 702 is just the tip of the iceberg … ” “There have been so many erosions of our Fourth Amendment right to privacy.” “The Bank Secrecy Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Patriot Act … all of them created so-called loopholes in the Constitution.” “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act … is used to go after Americans.” “I’ve been in a SCIF last week where I saw two secret rulings … of how the government has created additional loopholes to spy on you that I’m not even allowed to tell you.” “And finally, the third-party doctrine.” “It’s based on a ruling of the Supreme Court … I think it was a bad ruling, but it’s been expanded in its interpretation to include things like doctor’s appointment records, bank records, phone records … Flock cameras.” “Imagine … that you turn AI loose on these databases.” “Now, there’s virtually nothing the government can’t know about you without a warrant.” “That is why we’ve created … the Surveillance Accountability Act.” “It closes these loopholes that I’ve explained.” “And more importantly, it creates a private right of action.” “It’s almost impossible to sue federal government employees if they infringe on your constitutional rights.” “The second half of this bill gives you the right to sue the government employee.” “If they infringe on your constitutional rights, they could be privately and personally sued for that.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress Lauren Boebert

Holden Culotta

57,703 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Supreme Court has weakened key voting rights protections. The Michigan Voting Rights Act would put those protections back in place at the state level. If the fall of Roe taught us anything, it’s that our rights are under attack. And we need to fight for them. In Michigan, we are.
1:54

The Supreme Court has weakened key voting rights protections. The Michigan Voting Rights Act would put those protections back in place at the state level. If the fall of Roe taught us anything, it’s that our rights are under attack. And we need to fight for them. In Michigan, we are.

Mallory McMorrow

15,913 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Thomas Massie blocked a plan to give AI data centers immunity from local and state laws. Twice. And he blocked a plan to give pesticide companies immunity to mass poison Americans. “It’s cronyism.” “The first version of the Big Bill had a provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.” “And not just state laws, but local zoning laws.” “Marjorie Taylor Greene and I fought to get that taken out, and it was taken out, fortunately.” “That issue came up again recently in my Judiciary Committee.” “We were marking up eight bills one day in a work session, and I noticed that number six on the list was to exempt data centers from eight different environmental laws.” “They couldn’t be sued if they didn’t have the permits.” “Even though some of those environmental laws may be onerous, I don’t know why you would give an exemption to data centers, but not to the farmers or other industries.” “So I tweeted about it, in real time, blew the whistle, and they decided to take it off of the schedule that day.” “I have obstructed things like special privileges and immunities for data centers.” “And most recently in the Farm Bill, they had a provision that was gonna give special privileges and immunities … to Monsanto-Bayer, which makes glyphosate.” “They said, we’ll give every pesticide immunity from all state labeling laws.” “Myself and some other colleagues worked hard, we drafted amendments.” “We forced it to a vote on the floor of the House and took that special provision … removed from the Farm Bill.” “And I did vote for the Farm Bill because it has my signature piece of legislation in it, which is a bill to make it easier for farmers to use a local processor and sell their beef, pork, and lamb directly to consumers.” This is why the deep state is desperately trying to oust him from Congress right now. And it’s why he needs the people to rally behind him now more than ever. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress
2:56

Thomas Massie blocked a plan to give AI data centers immunity from local and state laws. Twice. And he blocked a plan to give pesticide companies immunity to mass poison Americans. “It’s cronyism.” “The first version of the Big Bill had a provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.” “And not just state laws, but local zoning laws.” “Marjorie Taylor Greene and I fought to get that taken out, and it was taken out, fortunately.” “That issue came up again recently in my Judiciary Committee.” “We were marking up eight bills one day in a work session, and I noticed that number six on the list was to exempt data centers from eight different environmental laws.” “They couldn’t be sued if they didn’t have the permits.” “Even though some of those environmental laws may be onerous, I don’t know why you would give an exemption to data centers, but not to the farmers or other industries.” “So I tweeted about it, in real time, blew the whistle, and they decided to take it off of the schedule that day.” “I have obstructed things like special privileges and immunities for data centers.” “And most recently in the Farm Bill, they had a provision that was gonna give special privileges and immunities … to Monsanto-Bayer, which makes glyphosate.” “They said, we’ll give every pesticide immunity from all state labeling laws.” “Myself and some other colleagues worked hard, we drafted amendments.” “We forced it to a vote on the floor of the House and took that special provision … removed from the Farm Bill.” “And I did vote for the Farm Bill because it has my signature piece of legislation in it, which is a bill to make it easier for farmers to use a local processor and sell their beef, pork, and lamb directly to consumers.” This is why the deep state is desperately trying to oust him from Congress right now. And it’s why he needs the people to rally behind him now more than ever. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

100,695 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.
0:43

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,514 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Sen. Josh Hawley SLAMS local district court judges issuing national injunctions on the Trump admin, calls for SCOTUS or Congress to intervene: "These are district courts, local federal courts, that are saying, 'I'm not just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I'm going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.'" "That is not a power that I think district courts have... what needs to happen is one of two things: Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions." Subscribe for the entire discussion 👉 Josh Hawley
4:15

Sen. Josh Hawley SLAMS local district court judges issuing national injunctions on the Trump admin, calls for SCOTUS or Congress to intervene: "These are district courts, local federal courts, that are saying, 'I'm not just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I'm going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.'" "That is not a power that I think district courts have... what needs to happen is one of two things: Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions." Subscribe for the entire discussion 👉 Josh Hawley

Charlie Kirk

524,379 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill
3:20

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

Arshad Madani

70,850 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr