Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Thomas Massie supporters claim parliamentary rules prevent him from reading Epstein names, but morning hour debates allow members to speak on any topic. He and Ro Khanna have done this before. Why the delay now? Is he protecting pedophiles?

AlanJacoby's profile picture

Alan Jacoby

54,724 subscribers

18,312 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨NEW: Rep. Ro Khanna is questioning whether Epstein killed himself after seeing more of the Epstein files “I don’t have any definitive proof or evidence, but certainly I have more questions why he died and whether he was killed.”
1:03

🚨NEW: Rep. Ro Khanna is questioning whether Epstein killed himself after seeing more of the Epstein files “I don’t have any definitive proof or evidence, but certainly I have more questions why he died and whether he was killed.”

Jack Cocchiarella

64,048 views • 5 months ago

🚨BREAKING: Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna just viewed unredacted Epstein files, and found names that were hidden before. Bipartisan lawmakers are calling out the DOJ for continuing to redact critical info. The cover-up is unraveling!! EXPOSE IT ALL!!!
2:02

🚨BREAKING: Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna just viewed unredacted Epstein files, and found names that were hidden before. Bipartisan lawmakers are calling out the DOJ for continuing to redact critical info. The cover-up is unraveling!! EXPOSE IT ALL!!!

Bethany O’Leary 🇺🇸 🦅

18,930 views • 6 months ago

George Stephanopoulos: "Speaker Johnson says you've been misled. He also suggested... President Trump was an informant to the FBI about Jeffrey Epstein." Thomas Massie: "Why was Donald Trump an informant to a hoax?" Ro Khanna: "We have the 218 votes."
1:50

George Stephanopoulos: "Speaker Johnson says you've been misled. He also suggested... President Trump was an informant to the FBI about Jeffrey Epstein." Thomas Massie: "Why was Donald Trump an informant to a hoax?" Ro Khanna: "We have the 218 votes."

Blue Georgia

798,424 views • 11 months ago

Thomas Massie claims he will publicly read the names of Jeffrey Epstein’s clients before his time in Congress ends. My question is: If this is truly about justice for the victims, why the hell is he waiting another 7 months? Why not release the names right now like a man with actual balls? The delay is pathetic and makes zero sense. Everyone should bookmark this post and check back on January 3rd. If Massie doesn’t follow through, it’ll prove once again he’s a complete and total fraud who never intended to release the names. Thomas Massie
0:54

Thomas Massie claims he will publicly read the names of Jeffrey Epstein’s clients before his time in Congress ends. My question is: If this is truly about justice for the victims, why the hell is he waiting another 7 months? Why not release the names right now like a man with actual balls? The delay is pathetic and makes zero sense. Everyone should bookmark this post and check back on January 3rd. If Massie doesn’t follow through, it’ll prove once again he’s a complete and total fraud who never intended to release the names. Thomas Massie

Gina Milan

241,784 views • 3 months ago

This cuts straight through the Epstein noise. Scott Jennings said the quiet part out loud — if members of Congress claim they have names, then why aren’t they saying them? He took aim directly at Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie. JENNINGS: “There are people here who can go down to the House floor more or go out into the public domain and say, here are the men who need to be investigated.” “That’s where I think most Americans are.” “Why can’t we just skip to the part where the people who have the information say out loud, this person did this thing to me, and this is a crime?” CNN’s Kasie Hunt quickly stepped in. HUNT: “Well, in a lot of cases they’re not allowed to because they’re bound—” Scott Jennings shut it down immediately. JENNINGS: “Members of Congress can go down to the House floor and say anything they want.” “And there are members of Congress who have claimed — Ro Khanna is one, Thomas Massie is one — they have claimed to have names.” “And I don’t know why we’re not actually seeing that right now to be honest with you.”
0:34

This cuts straight through the Epstein noise. Scott Jennings said the quiet part out loud — if members of Congress claim they have names, then why aren’t they saying them? He took aim directly at Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie. JENNINGS: “There are people here who can go down to the House floor more or go out into the public domain and say, here are the men who need to be investigated.” “That’s where I think most Americans are.” “Why can’t we just skip to the part where the people who have the information say out loud, this person did this thing to me, and this is a crime?” CNN’s Kasie Hunt quickly stepped in. HUNT: “Well, in a lot of cases they’re not allowed to because they’re bound—” Scott Jennings shut it down immediately. JENNINGS: “Members of Congress can go down to the House floor and say anything they want.” “And there are members of Congress who have claimed — Ro Khanna is one, Thomas Massie is one — they have claimed to have names.” “And I don’t know why we’re not actually seeing that right now to be honest with you.”

Overton

291,383 views • 6 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: RO KHANNA BLOWS THE LID OFF EPSTEIN FILES — “WHY ARE WE PROTECTING A SULTAN?” Rep. Ro Khanna just said the quiet part out loud. While reviewing Epstein records, Khanna says DOJ redactions shielded a “Sultan — a powerful person in Dubai” allegedly tied to the files — and asks the question millions are asking: “Why not put out his name?” Khanna says he and Rep. Thomas Massie found six protected names in just two hours. If that’s true, how many more are buried across millions of pages? This isn’t rumor. It’s a sitting member of Congress accusing the system of protecting powerful foreign figures while victims wait for truth. No more redactions. No more immunity by status. Name them. All of them. Rep. Ro Khanna
0:54

🚨 BREAKING: RO KHANNA BLOWS THE LID OFF EPSTEIN FILES — “WHY ARE WE PROTECTING A SULTAN?” Rep. Ro Khanna just said the quiet part out loud. While reviewing Epstein records, Khanna says DOJ redactions shielded a “Sultan — a powerful person in Dubai” allegedly tied to the files — and asks the question millions are asking: “Why not put out his name?” Khanna says he and Rep. Thomas Massie found six protected names in just two hours. If that’s true, how many more are buried across millions of pages? This isn’t rumor. It’s a sitting member of Congress accusing the system of protecting powerful foreign figures while victims wait for truth. No more redactions. No more immunity by status. Name them. All of them. Rep. Ro Khanna

Jim Ferguson

145,220 views • 6 months ago

We need more people like Thomas Massie. He is the only Republican to actually stand up and do something. And yet the media is spending this time attacking him politically. Turning him into someone that he simply isn't. Painting him into a democrat like Ro Khanna. One that hates Trump. Why? Because he's holding them accountable. And simply put, people need to be more like Massie.
0:39

We need more people like Thomas Massie. He is the only Republican to actually stand up and do something. And yet the media is spending this time attacking him politically. Turning him into someone that he simply isn't. Painting him into a democrat like Ro Khanna. One that hates Trump. Why? Because he's holding them accountable. And simply put, people need to be more like Massie.

Human ReAction

11,270 views • 6 months ago

Tom Tiffany says Democrats’ focus on Epstein to “change the subject in any way that they can for electoral gain.” I disagree. This is about holding the wealthy and powerful to account. I’m grateful to Ro Khanna and Republican Thomas Massie for leading this fight.
0:43

Tom Tiffany says Democrats’ focus on Epstein to “change the subject in any way that they can for electoral gain.” I disagree. This is about holding the wealthy and powerful to account. I’m grateful to Ro Khanna and Republican Thomas Massie for leading this fight.

Sarah Godlewski

11,041 views • 6 months ago

🚨 UPDATE: Rep. Thomas Massie is now claiming he will drop Epstein names not yet released, by the time he is out of Congress Q: In the coming weeks and months? MASSIE: Yes. Massie is OUT of Congress starting early-January 2027 after Trump defeated him
1:14

🚨 UPDATE: Rep. Thomas Massie is now claiming he will drop Epstein names not yet released, by the time he is out of Congress Q: In the coming weeks and months? MASSIE: Yes. Massie is OUT of Congress starting early-January 2027 after Trump defeated him

Eric Daugherty

241,819 views • 3 months ago

Dave Smith, on Thomas Massie's "MoneyBomb" fundraiser, says if there were 500 Massies in Congress, we might finally "crack the code" and find out why "everyone's speaking in code" in all those Epstein Files. Massie brags that he "uncovered the pedophiles." Which ones? Any names?
1:18

Dave Smith, on Thomas Massie's "MoneyBomb" fundraiser, says if there were 500 Massies in Congress, we might finally "crack the code" and find out why "everyone's speaking in code" in all those Epstein Files. Massie brags that he "uncovered the pedophiles." Which ones? Any names?

Michael Tracey

80,903 views • 4 months ago

House Rules Committee kills Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie’s attempt to prevent the merging of United States and Israeli military This is HIGH TREASON. Zionist Occupied America has now been legislated into reality
2:37

House Rules Committee kills Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie’s attempt to prevent the merging of United States and Israeli military This is HIGH TREASON. Zionist Occupied America has now been legislated into reality

Nick Cruse 🥋

16,697 views • 1 month ago

TODAY on The Charlie Kirk Show… on Epstein: “The DOJ’s release of these documents, obviously spurred on by Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who have attempted to weaponize the release for their own political ends." —Andrew Kolvet Do they realize the truths about Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, the resignation of Kathy Ruemmler and others being discussed are ALL surfacing because of the work Massie and Ro Khanna forced into motion? The DOJ was done. Finished. These files were not coming out on their own. That’s exactly why Massie had to act — and why there’s still work to do: more unredactions, more releases, real investigations, real arrests. 🔥 This is what it looks like when protecting the party establishment takes priority over protecting the truth. Sad to watch.
2:02

TODAY on The Charlie Kirk Show… on Epstein: “The DOJ’s release of these documents, obviously spurred on by Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who have attempted to weaponize the release for their own political ends." —Andrew Kolvet Do they realize the truths about Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, the resignation of Kathy Ruemmler and others being discussed are ALL surfacing because of the work Massie and Ro Khanna forced into motion? The DOJ was done. Finished. These files were not coming out on their own. That’s exactly why Massie had to act — and why there’s still work to do: more unredactions, more releases, real investigations, real arrests. 🔥 This is what it looks like when protecting the party establishment takes priority over protecting the truth. Sad to watch.

Louisa Clary

43,920 views • 6 months ago

Ro Khanna: "The vice president should be asked to retract what he said, defaming the Wall Street Journal reporter. He said it was fake. And now we have the letter." Erin Burnett: "Do you have any reason to doubt after getting this from the Epstein estate that that is Trump's signature." Khanna: "There's no reason for us to doubt it."
1:24

Ro Khanna: "The vice president should be asked to retract what he said, defaming the Wall Street Journal reporter. He said it was fake. And now we have the letter." Erin Burnett: "Do you have any reason to doubt after getting this from the Epstein estate that that is Trump's signature." Khanna: "There's no reason for us to doubt it."

Blue Georgia

219,769 views • 11 months ago

Ro Khanna BLASTS the establishment wing of the Republican Party for attacking Thomas Massie. He says young Republicans overwhelmingly back Massie and are creating a new opportunity for a bipartisan coalition against foreign wars, endless aid packages, and the Epstein class. “It’s despicable what they’re doing to him.” “They’re not just attacking him, they’re going after character assassination.” “Massie is a person of character.” “He said he’s winning by about 30 points with Republicans under 50.” “And he’s losing by about 30 points with Republicans over 50.” “The energy is with him, the young people are with him.” “The Republican Party under 50 is a very different Republican Party than the traditional Republicans.” “That gives an opportunity on some of these issues to build a broad coalition.” “Against war, against aid to Israel, and against the Epstein class.” Thomas Massie Ro Khanna
1:06

Ro Khanna BLASTS the establishment wing of the Republican Party for attacking Thomas Massie. He says young Republicans overwhelmingly back Massie and are creating a new opportunity for a bipartisan coalition against foreign wars, endless aid packages, and the Epstein class. “It’s despicable what they’re doing to him.” “They’re not just attacking him, they’re going after character assassination.” “Massie is a person of character.” “He said he’s winning by about 30 points with Republicans under 50.” “And he’s losing by about 30 points with Republicans over 50.” “The energy is with him, the young people are with him.” “The Republican Party under 50 is a very different Republican Party than the traditional Republicans.” “That gives an opportunity on some of these issues to build a broad coalition.” “Against war, against aid to Israel, and against the Epstein class.” Thomas Massie Ro Khanna

End Tribalism in Politics

16,427 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING: Ro Khanna responds to the rumor that Trump is having Republican names scrubbed from the Epstein files. And he has a stark warning for anyone who would participate in such acts.
1:12

BREAKING: Ro Khanna responds to the rumor that Trump is having Republican names scrubbed from the Epstein files. And he has a stark warning for anyone who would participate in such acts.

Ed Krassenstein

105,428 views • 9 months ago

After reviewing some of the UN-REDACTED Epstein files at the DOJ today, Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna say at least six men are implicated in the files, with one of them being a "prominent person" and another being "pretty high up" in a foreign government. Khanna pointed out that they found the six names by just reviewing files for two hours. Massie says he will discuss the names on the floor of the House of Representatives where he has legal protections. DOJ set up a room where members of Congress can review the Epstein files without redactions; however, members have already complained today that there are only four computers and that some of the files remain redacted. Khanna and Massie also noted that some of the files arrived at the DOJ from the FBI with redactions already applied, and that their legislation requires the FBI to remove those redactions; the FBI operates under the Department of Justice. Massie also said that the "algorithm" the DOJ used to process redactions over-redacted the names of women.
1:18

After reviewing some of the UN-REDACTED Epstein files at the DOJ today, Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna say at least six men are implicated in the files, with one of them being a "prominent person" and another being "pretty high up" in a foreign government. Khanna pointed out that they found the six names by just reviewing files for two hours. Massie says he will discuss the names on the floor of the House of Representatives where he has legal protections. DOJ set up a room where members of Congress can review the Epstein files without redactions; however, members have already complained today that there are only four computers and that some of the files remain redacted. Khanna and Massie also noted that some of the files arrived at the DOJ from the FBI with redactions already applied, and that their legislation requires the FBI to remove those redactions; the FBI operates under the Department of Justice. Massie also said that the "algorithm" the DOJ used to process redactions over-redacted the names of women.

Yashar Ali 🐘

139,509 views • 6 months ago

Ro Khanna: “There are 13,000 mentions of him in the files. He lied to the American people that he had never been on Epstein’s plane. There’s certainly far more evidence of him in the files than there is of President Clinton. He is losing part of the MAGA base. He’s not releasing the files. He’s protecting pedophiles.”
0:45

Ro Khanna: “There are 13,000 mentions of him in the files. He lied to the American people that he had never been on Epstein’s plane. There’s certainly far more evidence of him in the files than there is of President Clinton. He is losing part of the MAGA base. He’s not releasing the files. He’s protecting pedophiles.”

Marco Foster

128,193 views • 7 months ago

Absolute betrayal. Rep. Massie exposes how Trump's inner circle in NYC and Palm Beach completely overlaps with the Epstein network. Voters elected Trump believing he would expose the elite pedophiles, but instead, he is actively protecting them to save his friends.
0:46

Absolute betrayal. Rep. Massie exposes how Trump's inner circle in NYC and Palm Beach completely overlaps with the Epstein network. Voters elected Trump believing he would expose the elite pedophiles, but instead, he is actively protecting them to save his friends.

Furkan Gözükara

68,225 views • 5 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 KHANNA: FILE REDACTIONS ARE PROTECTING “POWERFUL MEN” Rep. Ro Khanna says files released under a law he and Thomas Massie pushed reference “10 co-conspirators,” but key names remain blacked out. According to Khanna, the redactions aren’t about caution, they’re about shielding powerful men accused of abusing working-class girls or helping cover it up. Why this matters: transparency laws are supposed to expose wrongdoing, not sanitize it, and redactions like this fuel public distrust. The documents are out, but accountability is still missing… and that’s the part people are noticing. Rep. Khanna: “This is not that complicated… just release the FBI files where the survivors were interviewed. Some of the names are famous names, a lot of them are financial people in powerful positions… not all of them abused underaged girls, but some of them were at parties where there were 13 year old's paraded naked. Some of them had girls trafficked to them, and some of them actually did abuse underaged girls Release those files! They’re hiding it. If they were honest, they’re hiding it because they’re protecting people… affiliates of Trump. This Epstein class needs to be held accountable.” Source: Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie
1:41

🚨🇺🇸 KHANNA: FILE REDACTIONS ARE PROTECTING “POWERFUL MEN” Rep. Ro Khanna says files released under a law he and Thomas Massie pushed reference “10 co-conspirators,” but key names remain blacked out. According to Khanna, the redactions aren’t about caution, they’re about shielding powerful men accused of abusing working-class girls or helping cover it up. Why this matters: transparency laws are supposed to expose wrongdoing, not sanitize it, and redactions like this fuel public distrust. The documents are out, but accountability is still missing… and that’s the part people are noticing. Rep. Khanna: “This is not that complicated… just release the FBI files where the survivors were interviewed. Some of the names are famous names, a lot of them are financial people in powerful positions… not all of them abused underaged girls, but some of them were at parties where there were 13 year old's paraded naked. Some of them had girls trafficked to them, and some of them actually did abuse underaged girls Release those files! They’re hiding it. If they were honest, they’re hiding it because they’re protecting people… affiliates of Trump. This Epstein class needs to be held accountable.” Source: Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie

Mario Nawfal

107,539 views • 8 months ago