Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Thread 🧵 When Suzanne Vella spotted a dog panting heavily inside a hot pickup truck in a Wendy’s parking lot in Cornelius, North Carolina, she knew she had to act. But her good Samaritan efforts nearly led to criminal charges. Vella called 911, searched inside the restaurant for the...

24,390 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This is excellent ~ callous Dog owner who left her Dog in a hot car gets called out in the best way! Well done officer👮 👏. The police officer called her “callous”. She called what he did “abusive”, but when the woman who admitted to leaving her Dog in a hot car called a news station to complain, she ended up with a dose of karma instead. KOB News investigated what happened and after the woman asked the news channel to look into her complaint against the officer, saying that he forced her to sit in the hot car she had left her Dog in. But the news channel discovered that the officer had a label pin video recording the entire time and it tells a different story. Officer Vincent Kreischer noticed a Dog inside a parked truck at a grocery store’s parking lot in Truth or Consequence, New Mexico, with the temperatures outside of over 90 degrees Fahrenheit and confronted the owner. The woman told him she only left the Dog for 10 minutes, and began to argue with him about how hot it really was. But Officer Kreischer estimated that inside the vehicle would be 114 degrees (45.5 C) after that length of time. When he confronted her, he says she shrugged it off with a laugh and was “callous and carefree” about her dog’s welfare. That’s when he took action. He decided to write her a ticket, and asked her to wait in her car is since, according to her, it wasn’t that hot. “You can wait in the truck and close the door you know, since it’s not that hot,” he responded. Kreischer observed, “She gives me an attitude from word one, and then she doesn’t want to close the door. So I’m like, ‘Oh, but it’s OK if your Dog does.'” In the end, the officer's simple lesson spoke louder than any argument: if you wouldn't sit in a sweltering parked car, your dog shouldn't have to either.

PROTECT ALL WILDLIFE

29,220 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Another example of a "moment of not thinking" turned a civil parking dispute into a criminal arrest record. ​The dispute appears to have started over a parking lot disagreement. According to the officers on the scene: ​The woman (referred to in the video overlay as "Karen") allegedly opened the other driver's car door and reached inside. ​The other driver—who is seen speaking with the police—wishes to pursue charges for what she describes as an assault and a violation of her personal space. ​The woman in the grey sweatshirt denies the severity of the incident, claiming: ​She has anxiety and was having a "moment of not thinking." ​She argues that she didn't "assault" anyone and was merely frustrated because she felt the other driver was blocking her or nearly "rear-ended" her. ​She repeatedly attempts to apologize to the other driver to avoid legal trouble, but the officer prevents her from doing so, stating that the other party does not wish to speak with her and is intent on pressing charges. ​The officers emphasize that regardless of the initial "beef" over parking, reaching into someone else's vehicle is a serious legal matter, which is why they are treating it as a criminal complaint rather than a simple argument. The progression of the incident led to several definitive legal steps: ​Criminal Complaint: The victim (the driver of the other car) explicitly stated her intent to press charges. In the video, the officer confirms to the woman in the grey, "She wants to pursue the complaint." ​The Charge: The primary issue was not just the argument over the parking spot, but the fact that the woman opened the other driver's car door. In most jurisdictions, this can be classified as Burglary of a Conveyance (entering a vehicle with intent to commit an offense) or Battery/Assault, depending on the level of physical contact. ​Failed De-escalation: The woman repeatedly tried to apologize ("Can I just say sorry?"), but the officer denied the request because once a victim decides to press charges and a crime (reaching into the car) has been committed, an apology doesn't "cancel" the legal process. ​The Handcuffs: In the final segments of the footage, the officer directs her to turn around and places her in handcuffs, informing her she is being detained/arrested based on the victim's sworn statement and the physical evidence of her opening the door.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

25,249 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад