Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“Thuggish, sectarian, right-wing accounts.” “You couldn’t get a sheet of paper between them and the far right.” “They don’t want your kind of toxic gender ideology at their festival.” “They were the same people cheering on attacks on migrants.” “I’d be embarrassed if my political allies were Elon Musk...

73,340 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 38

Фото профиля Difficult Woman
Difficult Woman2 месяцев назад

It was a painful listen. @HJoyceGender deserves a medal for services to common sense and reason.

Фото профиля Simone
Simone2 месяцев назад

@HJoyceGender is one of the calmest, knowledgeable and articulate speakers I have had the pleasure of listening to.

Фото профиля Kathryn 🖤 KPSS
Kathryn 🖤 KPSS2 месяцев назад

Allison Morris recaps the GC position, but still won't add the dots. 'To take what you’re saying, you have to assume that every single man, ESPECIALLY every trans woman, is a rapist.' She admits TW are men & knows the lengths predators go to but berates women for seeing danger.

Фото профиля Linda Thomas
Linda Thomas2 месяцев назад

Shouldn’t this opinion journalism be referred to @Ofcom. How are the general public to know what is opinion journalism and proper journalism?

Фото профиля human
human2 месяцев назад

I've just looked under her twitter timeline on the article - i really cannot see the abuse she mentions?

Фото профиля TOM25
TOM252 месяцев назад

She lost as soon as she pulled the labelling trick that doesn’t work anymore. This far right/left imported nonsense needs binned. Instead of looking at the merits of an argument, people are trying to put it on a spectrum. That’s a poor substitute for debate.

Фото профиля Brook Hines 💚🕊️💜 crisis of reason noticer
Brook Hines 💚🕊️💜 crisis of reason noticer2 месяцев назад

@LadyMusicGeek by reflexively claiming the opposite of her political opponents, Allison is actually the one looking to the rightwing to write her script. she’s already got them dictating the boundaries of her thinking.

Фото профиля Angie Jones
Angie Jones2 месяцев назад

Maybe she heard Helen talk about the relatives of trans kids being the ones who would never admit they were wrong and took it personally? I would love to know who she thinks she is defending.

Фото профиля PanBillyBraggWoman 🦕🦖
PanBillyBraggWoman 🦕🦖2 месяцев назад

It's unbelievable that she says she scrolled social media feeds but 'didn't have time to' look at @HJoyceGender 's

Фото профиля Helen Nettleship
Helen Nettleship2 месяцев назад

Just catching up with this. Kin ‘ell. @HJoyceGender is a saint for tolerating this.

Фото профиля Teacake 💚🤍 💜#179
Teacake 💚🤍 💜#1792 месяцев назад

Allison was shockingly unprepared for this interview. How utterly embarrassing.

Фото профиля @mdmak33
@mdmak332 месяцев назад

Its shocking to see people having to defend women's rights & even more shocking to see the language some people are using to describe good people defending women's rights, especially women who had these protections when growing up

Фото профиля Science + Politics = Politics
Science + Politics = Politics2 месяцев назад

@citizenjournos_ @AllisonMorris1 making the argument that vegetarians are Nazis because Hitler was one…

Фото профиля Mrs Crochet 🦖🟩⬜️🟪🎗️
Mrs Crochet 🦖🟩⬜️🟪🎗️2 месяцев назад

Helen really took one for the team listening to the bilge water coming out of Allison Morris’ mouth Allison is an Trangender ideologue who has only belief and no facts. As ever it’s like trying to argue with a cult member.

Фото профиля Siubhán O'Connor
Siubhán O'Connor2 месяцев назад

Wow! That’s a very uncomfortable listen. To casually lump the majority of us in with far-right thugs is bad enough. But the wholesale conflation of issues, coupled with blatant misrepresentations by AM, calls into question her judgement, objectivity & credibility going forward.

Фото профиля Sportsnut2nd
Sportsnut2nd2 месяцев назад

America is the Worlds most inhospitable place for women she says. Really ?

Фото профиля Allan Joe Land
Allan Joe Land2 месяцев назад

In a failed attempt to discredit Joyce, Morris uses a wide variety of techniques and fallacies here. Strawmaning the argument. Motte and bailey defence. Guilt by association. Ad hominem attacks. It's all there. Quite the "journalist".

Фото профиля Barry Wall
Barry Wall2 месяцев назад

She was all over the place.

Фото профиля Alex Smith
Alex Smith2 месяцев назад

Part of the problem is 'opinion journalism.' Journalism is not involved. The paper *wants* a piece that is devoid of balance and nuance, ideally laced with self-righteous anger. Morris was doing her job. She just didn't expect an intelligent, informed rebuttal.

Фото профиля SEEN in Journalism
SEEN in Journalism2 месяцев назад

That is not correct. No one wants to read a column that sits on the fence. And great op-eds often offer a perspective that is surprising or challenging. But what you say must still be underpinned by fact and evidence. For example, if you’re going to say women’s grassroots groups like WRN are ‘well-funded’ you must have evidence to support that claim. If that means putting in a few calls to source/verify information- that’s what you must do. A journalist still has a responsibility to ensure they do not misrepresent individuals, groups or institutions - regardless of whether they’re reporting or writing opinion.

Фото профиля Alex Smith
Alex Smith2 месяцев назад

What bit is not correct? You seem to agree that opinion is intended to be one-sided. I agree that any facts should be correct, but it's often as easy to omit an inconvenient fact as it is to misstate it. As we are all too aware, it's easy to write an opinion about the woes of trans-identifying people without addressing the impact of their demands on women.

Фото профиля SEEN in Journalism
SEEN in Journalism2 месяцев назад

Joyce pointed out the parts she claims are incorrect in the interview. You speak about misstating facts like it’s comparable to forgetting your umbrella on a day rain isn’t forecast. In journalism, accuracy is everything. That isn’t to say mistakes don’t happen - they do. But when they do happen, they should be acknowledged and corrected - ideally as quickly as possible.

Фото профиля Alex Smith
Alex Smith2 месяцев назад

I agree with everything you're saying -except your characterization of what I'm saying. In my first comment, I said nothing about facts. You raised facts in your response, and I agreed in my second comment that they should be correct. Where on earth did you get, "comparable to forgetting your umbrella?" I was clear that if you include facts they must be correct. And you ARE allowed to omit them if they're inconvenient.

Фото профиля Vikki Sewell
Vikki Sewell2 месяцев назад

I particularly liked the "you haven't been silenced" from Morris only to be reminded that the whole reason this conversation was even happening is that a women only event had just been cancelled because it was a women only event. The tide turning is that its no longer silenced.

Фото профиля Sam Bates
Sam Bates2 месяцев назад

What incredible restraint you showed @HJoyceGender. You were incredible, and yes, rightfully annoyed. I'm not a hugger, but here's a virtual hug anyway.

Фото профиля Happy_in_LaLaLand
Happy_in_LaLaLand2 месяцев назад

What is Alison doing in this interview! Is it belief perseverance, cognitive dissonance, dogmatism, identity-protective cognition or just straight up denialism? It's honestly terrifying the lengths people have gone to in service of this ideology. Like, losing the plot 🤯

Фото профиля Nebulous woman of a Certain Age” Greer
Nebulous woman of a Certain Age” Greer2 месяцев назад

She’s still in 2020. The second hand cringe was real. @HJoyceGender was marvellous. The presenter could have challenged @AllisonMorris1 far more and stopped her being so rude.

Фото профиля Wezza
Wezza2 месяцев назад

One for those who see the "trans" nonce-sense as a simple women v men dichotomy which only more feminism can resolve. Women are often the most zealous for this utter nonce-sense.

Фото профиля NoComment
NoComment2 месяцев назад

I'm wondering why Catholics in Northern Ireland keep pushing for reunification with the rest of Ireland when the majority of the views they share are with the UK and not us.

Фото профиля LynseyRoddy
LynseyRoddy2 месяцев назад

Someone at the @BelTel needs to have a word with her before she & it are dragged through the courts because she incorrectly thinks you can right whatever you want in a column whether she’s bothered to fact check it or not.

Фото профиля Sam Bates
Sam Bates2 месяцев назад

Do you hear that women in Afghanistan? As a woman in America, I'm waaaaaaay more oppressed than you. But I'm still trying to figure out how... I need a condescending, lying journalist to connect those dots.

Фото профиля Kat 🏳️‍🌈
Kat 🏳️‍🌈2 месяцев назад

Why don’t you like the truth? That’s who’s on your side

Фото профиля James Gerard
James Gerard2 месяцев назад

She seems a self-righteous hypocrite and a classic practitioner of old-fashioned, mud-slinging 'gutter journalism'.

Фото профиля Sam Bates
Sam Bates2 месяцев назад

Only 13 out of 50 states ban abortion. This is because the people who live there have voted in the majority for those laws. Roe v. Wade reversal was not a universal ban on abortion, it was returning the decision back to the 50 states. Hate it all you want, but people vote with their beliefs. As a woman privileged to be a citizen and resident of the United States, I wonder if Allison feels that women in Poland or Liechtenstein are as oppressed as the women in the 13 states with similar abortion laws? As an American woman, I have the right to a career, property ownership, free speech and all the other rights afforded to men in this country. I can't help but feel a little sad for the billions of women around the world with fewer rights than me. Despite doing a journalism, Allison has overlooked their plight.

Фото профиля Julie McNamee 💚🤍💜 🦖🦉
Julie McNamee 💚🤍💜 🦖🦉2 месяцев назад

I've heard some nasty lying sh*te in my time, but what Allison Morris spouts in this REALLY takes the biscuit.

Фото профиля Scottish Chick
Scottish Chick2 месяцев назад

Oh I got angry listening to that, I don’t know how you manage to keep your composure @HJoyceGender you’re a better woman than me, I’d have grabbed her like a toddler and told her to put her listening ears on. What a wholly ignorant woman.

Фото профиля Suzanne Williams ✝️
Suzanne Williams ✝️2 месяцев назад

Bingo!! I didn’t expect to fill my bingo card within 5 mins of Alison’s diatribe.

Фото профиля Louise Green
Louise Green2 месяцев назад

The ‘far right’ are pro-women’s rights 😂 Most ludicrous thing I’ve heard all day. Helen did a grand job exposing the extremist nut job.

Похожие видео

"Tristan identifies as a trans woman. Her preferred pronouns are she/her." These are the words of BBC Radio Ulster presenter Chris Buckler during today's interview with Fiona McAnena from Sex Matters. About a male guest. They were discussing his recent interview with Tristan Morrow - a young man who left the Orange Order and now identifies as a trans woman. SEEN in Journalism criticised that interview for: - Inaccuracy: using female pronouns for a man - Failing to challenge contested ideological claims - Not mentioning women once - despite covering disputes over women's sex-based spaces We've now had the chance to listen back to today's interview with Fiona (McAnena). While it was encouraging to hear a gender-critical woman given similar airtime, the two interviews could hardly have been more different. Morrow was largely allowed to tell his personal story uninterrupted and with relatively little challenge. McAnena faced repeated interruptions and hostile questioning, much of it relating to the recent controversy over the cancellation of a Women's Rights Network event at the Belfast arts festival Féile an Phobail. Among the questions Buckler put to her - some more than once - were: - Do you accept that people born male should be allowed to live as women? - Do you object to referring to Tristan Morrow as "she"? - How does using female pronouns for trans women impact your rights? - Do you believe trans people have a right to exist? - Do you accept there are adults who feel they are in the wrong body? - Would you welcome a trans person to your event ? McAnena did an admirable job of steering the conversation back to women's rights. Buckler repeatedly returned it to transgender identity. Buckler also made several references to SEEN in Journalism's criticism of his interview with Morrow, but appeared to misunderstand the substance of our argument. We did not say he should have included a female voice to "push back" on Morrow. We said he never mentioned women or women's rights once during a 21-minute interview about a dispute rooted in women's sex-based spaces. That is a different point entirely. We also raised concerns about inaccurate language - using female pronouns to describe a male guest. Rather than engaging with those concerns, Buckler appeared to double down - at one point, appearing to rebuke McAnena for referring to Morrow as "he". But our criticism wasn't about politeness. It was about accuracy. A principle the BBC should hold in the highest regard. At one point, Buckler said he wasn't speaking from either side. Yet across these two interviews, listeners learnt far more about identifying as trans than they did about why women defend sex-based rights. Good journalism should help audiences understand competing perspectives, not steer them towards one.

SEEN in Journalism

79,364 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The interview started off with Simon Jordan agreeing with Eni Aluko’s point on the women’s game. It went left when he made his opinion clear on her as a pundit … but he agreed with her stance on women’s football. If you’re black and joining the pile on I would recommend you watch the whole interview so your comments are from a fairer place of being informed on the context of the entire conversation. We owe that to any black person being scrutinised or abused in the media you don’t need to like or agree with them but she’s getting a lot of hate on her looks and skin colour over an opinion she gave in the women’s game. She has apologised for the Ian Wright comments she doesn’t need to be forgiven to be given a bit of grace. Black people jumping on the ‘She was a DEI hire’ viewpoint is disgraceful imo. Black non African women taking advantage of this to join the mob is also disgusting. Let’s do better this isn’t about taking her side but someone is very foul in the backlash she is getting and I don’t like it. A lot of women in presenting attacking her are going to benefit from her speaking up because the bosses won’t want her to seem right so will take the hits they agree with and make some tweaks. Fact remains she was the first black female football pundit after achieving a lot on the game and she does have a right to an opinion. A lot of people have taken a few clips and used that to misinterpret her overall viewpoint.

Investing Coach (StocksCryptoPropertyStartups)

23,153 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

41,792 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

We've just been passed the BBC's response to a complaint after Good Morning Scotland concealed an academic's links to Labour during an interview about the winter fuel payment and a warning from Age Scotland. We've reproduced the complaint and response below. We've also included the full interview. There's something untoward at play here. The complaint: Good Morning Scotland conducted an interview with professor June Andrews. The interview centred around the cut to the winter fuel payment and had been prompted by criticism by Age Scotland of the UK Labour Govt's decision to cut the benefit. The charity had claimed that cutting the benefit would see more old people admitted to hospital with hypothermia. The interview was conducted by Laura Maxwell who introduced the academic as follows "Well Professor June Andrews is an expert in the care of older people." The academic challenged Age Scotland's claims and backed Labour's decision to cut the benefit. Professor Andrews views were later used on the programme to challenge Scottish Govt minister Ivan McKee. The academic was presented as someone with no political allegiances or viewpoints. This was far from the truth. Professor June Andrews is a Labour supporter and party activist who makes no attempt to hide her political allegiance. A quick glance at her social media profile - publicly available at the time of the interview - makes this clear, with post after post promoting tweets from senior Labour party figures. The academic tweeted an image during the recent general election campaign showing her with other Labour party activists as they campaigned for Labour candidate Gregor Poynton. Section 4.3.12 of the BBC Guidelines states 'We should not automatically assume that contributors from other organisations (such as academics, journalists, researchers and representatives of charities and think-tanks) are unbiased. Appropriate information about their affiliations, funding and particular viewpoints should be made available to the audience, when relevant to the context.' Professor June Andrews was far from unbiased. Good Morning Scotland should have told listeners that the academic was a Labour party activist and supporter. In failing to do so the programme breached Section 4.3.12 of the BBC Guidelines. A public apology is merited. The response: We note your comments regarding Good Morning Scotland on 28 October and the interview with Prof June Andrews. As you mention, Prof Andrews was introduced as an “an expert in the care of older people” and was being interviewed for her view in this capacity, following Age Scotland’s claim that the cutting of the universal winter fuel benefit for pensioners will see more old people admitted to hospital with hypothermia. Prof Andrews, given her area of expertise, has been a contributor on a number of occasions to items regarding the care of older people and was again introduced in this context, with a range of views on the subject heard within the wider programme – this included hearing directly from Scottish Government minister Ivan McKee, as you say. While we wouldn’t agree with a suggestion that simply holding any political views was a requisite for such an introduction, given the capacity in which Prof Andrews was invited onto the programme to speak, we would suggest that the conveyance to listeners of any political views that a contributor may hold is not limited to how a guest is introduced; for example, there is the opportunity within the line of questioning and by any political points being scrutinised and challenged – accepting that, in a live interview, in keeping the interview and programme on track, it isn’t always possible to challenge a guest on every point they’ve made and that it may be a subsequent interview or similar piece of our output that provides for other views and points to be put across. We note your call for a public apology but don’t believe it is merited here. We would, however, remind our teams of the merit of identifying and challenging, there and then, political points made during interviews. Thank you again for getting in touch.

MSM Monitor

28,722 просмотров • 1 год назад

This might go down as one of Karoline Leavitt’s GREATEST media takedowns of ALL TIME. And she did it right to his smarmy face—her wrath was BIBLICAL. The reporter thought he had Leavitt dead to rights after she defended ICE and he listed out their stats. REPORTER: “Earlier, you were just defending ICE agents generally, and your own Secretary Noem spoke to the media and she said, among other things, that they are doing everything correctly.” “32 people died in ICE custody last year, 170 US Citizens were detained by ICE, and Renee Good was shot in the head and killed by an ICE agent.” “How does that equate to them doing everything correctly?” Leavitt didn’t even take a second to process—she fired back immediately. LEAVITT: “Why was Renee Good unfortunately and tragically killed?” REPORTER: “Are you asking me my opinion? Because an ICE agent acted recklessly and killed her unjustifiably.” LEAVITT: “Oh, okay. So you’re a biased reporter with a left-wing opinion.” REPORTER: “You’re asking me my opinion, what do you want me to do?” LEAVITT: “Yeah, because you’re a left-wing HACK. You’re not a reporter. You’re posing in this room as a journalist. And it’s so clear by the premise of your question.” “And you and the people in the media who have such biases, but fake like you’re a journalist, you shouldn’t even be sitting in that seat, but you’re pretending like you’re a journalist, but you’re a left-wing activist.” “And the question that you just raised in your answer proves your bias. You should be reporting on the facts. You should be reporting on the cases.” “Do you have the numbers of how many American citizens were killed at the hands of illegal aliens who ICE trying to remove from this country? I bet you don’t!” “I bet you didn’t even read up on those stories. I bet you never even read about Laken Riley or Jocelyn Nungaray, or all of the innocent Americans who were killed at the hands of illegal aliens in this country.” “And the brave men and women of ICE are doing everything in their power to remove those heinous individuals and make our communities safer.” “And shame on people like you in the media who have a crooked view and have a biased view, and pretend like you’re real, honest journalists.”

Overton

323,970 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Why Is Detroit’s Police Board Full of Felons? One served time for murder, another for running a chop shop, and a third for threatening to shoot a cop… Only in Detroit By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff The Detroit Board of Police Commissioners is a veritable work-release program. The board has not one… not two… but three ex-cons serving as civilian overseers of the Detroit Police Department. Now I’m all for second changes. But six? Remember, these commissioners sit in judgement of the people who put them behind bars. The police. I mean, you wouldn’t allow a troupe of pedophiles to work at a children’s circus, would you? The vice-chair of the board, Darryl Woods, spent 29 years in the state penitentiary for first-degree murder. Gov. Rick Snyder granted him clemency in 2019 and Woods was appointed to the board in 2023 by then-Mayor Mike Duggan. The second commissioner, Lavish T. Williams, has two convictions on his resume. One for shooting up a car with a guy in it, and another back in 2007 for running a chop shop. The man really likes tearing up cars, it seems. Williams is new to the board, elected last November when he ran unopposed in his district. He didn’t tell anybody about his priors, and nobody asked. The third commissioner, Darious Morris, finds himself in the news for all the wrong reasons. He was also elected to the board in November, just nine months after he was released from probation for threatening to shoot a Warren cop during a traffic stop that had nothing to do with him. Body-camera footage shows Morris wearing a fake police badge that he purchased online. Since nobody formally ran for the board to represent District 3, Morris ran as a write-in candidate. He garnered 518 votes. A total landslide. Morris never told anyone about his criminal history. And again, nobody asked. Morris’s rap sheet doesn’t end there. He did time in 2009 after pleading guilty to forgery and impersonating a notary public. In November 2021, Morris was caught playing dress-up again. That time he was pulled over by Detroit police officers who discovered Morris carrying a firearm and wearing a fake police chaplain’s badge. He tried to bullshit his way out of the felon-in-possession charge, but it didn’t work. Morris must have delivered an inspired homily from the back of the squad car, because when Morris was hauled before the judge, his arresting officer was a no-show. Morris was kicked free and the charges were dropped. That is, until Morris got elected police commissioner and was given a real badge. A nice badge. A golden badge. And the badge, it would seem, has gone to Morris’s head. A few weeks ago, Commissioner Morris made a trip to the 9th Precinct on the city’s east side. The east side is a notoriously dangerous place, known by its macabre sobriquet: Zip Code 4820-DIE. So when a real cop asked Morris to step through the precinct’s metal detector like every other nobody, Morris got butt hurt. Morris got angry. And naturally, Morris got on social media. He posted on Facebook personal information about the precinct commander and lieutenant. That’s when the commissioner’s education into the Thin Blue Line began in earnest. Ross Jones of WXYZ got hold of the story. He rang-up Morris good, complete with an interrogation of Morris and an airing of all his prior body cam footage. Then George Hunter of The Detroit News made inquiries to the Wayne County Prosecutor wondering why Morris’s gun charges were never reinstated? The prosecutor looked into it. And Morris was scared he was going back to prison. Until the prosecutor discovered that she could not reinstate the charges because the evidence—the handgun Morris was carrying that night—had since been melted down for scrap. For his part, Commissioner Morris resigned from the board. Then Commissioner Morris abruptly un-resigned from the board. And then, for whatever reason, Commissioner Morris called me. He said he wanted another interview. He said he wanted to set the record straight. So we set an appointment. And then Morris ghosted me. But I found him anyway, standing near the elevator shaft at police headquarters. Oddly, Morris was not wearing his nice, new golden badge.

Michigan Enjoyer

32,208 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🔥🚨 ELON MUSK WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG. 275,000 Illegals that they told us were NOT collecting Social Security were kicked off. Remember when the MOCKINGBIRD media came after Elon Musk & Tesla when he reported the fraud was being used as a MONEY MAGNET. Remember when he said there were 150 years olds on social security and that many of these people were FICTIONAL PEOPLE that someone was collecting a check for? Everyone OWES both Elon & Trump and thank you and there is ALOT more work to be done. Propaganda mouth piece Morning Joe is running the narrative & lie that Elon wants to eliminate Social Security & Medicaid. NO..he wants to remove the entitlement fraud by illegals and they are melting down saying "It doesn’t exist" and will make up figures. They forgot this video of the whistleblower admitting she was compelling to get illegals on the social security rolls by claiming they were disabled so they can receive the entitlements for life. So the lie by Luce that illegals “don’t withdraw from the system” is once again untrue. The meltdown is because they know he is correct and it’s a money magnet mechanism to retain voters through vote buying and the NGO’s that help process these “Clients” Also when they claim it is outrageous to call SS a Ponzi scheme they are lying and displaying cognitive dissonance because a Ponzi is something reliant on we money to pay old money. Same as SS except it is FORCED upon you without the ability to opt out by the Government.

Johnny St.Pete

72,392 просмотров • 1 год назад

#山根涼羽 Zunchan was clarifying something she said in her seitansai speech that seems to have been misunderstood after only a certain part was clipped and shared online. What she meant was never that AKB was “better” than KLP, or that she was criticizing KLP, Malaysia, or the people around her there. She explained that she is genuinely grateful for the environment she had in KLP, and at the same time, her experience in Malaysia made her realize how many things in AKB she had previously taken for granted. With KLP, they were essentially building a 48 Group and its idol culture from the ground up in a place where that system and environment were not already established. There were a lot of fun experiences, but naturally there were also difficult things that came with having to create something from scratch. Because she went through that experience, when she returned to AKB, she became more aware of all the things that were already established and prepared for the members there, and it made her feel grateful for the AKB environment as well. She specifically emphasized that this was NOT about saying one place was better than the other. She said that both places were wonderful to her, both were places she loved, and that was what she had wanted to convey. She also mentioned that some Malaysian fans had misunderstood what she meant, and clarified that she never intended for her words to be used to attack anyone. So I hope people can listen to what she is actually saying here rather than judging her based only on a clipped portion of her speech. Her point was about gaining a new appreciation for both environments through her experiences in each of them, not putting one down to praise the other.

Tina 🍉

17,578 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

NEW: Mollie schools lawfare apologist Marie Harf, lays out the fact that corrupt Democrat prosecutions against Trump were a highly motivating factor in the campaign: 🔥🔥🔥 HEMINGWAY: "The abuse of law was one of these underrated issues that that motivated a lot of people to vote for Donald Trump, having Democrat prosecutors up and down the eastern seaboard trying to imprison their political opponent, bankrupt their political opponent, remove him from the ballot. This was viewed as an assault on democracy." HARF: The reality is that Donald Trump was credibly accused of dozens of felony, charges, was convicted of many of them. And Donald Trump has stood on the campaign trail this campaign cycle and said he wants to go after his political opponents and put them in jail. You talk a lot here. My point is, but for Democrats and Americans who look at the litany of charges Donald Trump has been charged with, some of which we saw him do with our own eyes, the fact that you can be elected president and all of that criminality and possible, convictions just goes away and you are held above the law." HEMINGWAY: “The way the Democrat Party treated it, it was as if he and other Republicans were below the law. And that period is over, and a lot of people are happy about that." HARF: “Well now he’s above it, so congrats." Dems are super salty about the abject failure of their politically motivated lawfare campaigns against Trump.

Western Lensman

342,376 просмотров • 1 год назад

📣🚨 NEW FSU MEMBER TESTIMONIAL “Buying a Free Speech Union membership was the best thing I did at university” In 2024, Connie Shaw was disciplined by both Leeds University Union and the University of Leeds itself for expressing her gender-critical views. After being permanently removed from her committee position at Leeds Student Radio for daring to interview Graham Linehan and write for his Substack, the University of Leeds launched disciplinary action against her too, accusing her of harassing a member of staff. This was because Connie had suggested that having a man who identifies as a woman teaching feminist philosophy might lead gender-critical students to self-censor. She was accused of ‘misgendering’, ‘outing’, and using a ‘slur’ (“trans identified male”). Most outrageously, one of the charges was that she had given ‘the impression that she supports Graham Linehan’s views’ because she ‘did not dissociate herself’ from his remarks in the interview and said it was ‘an honour’ to interview him. The stakes were raised so high that, if Connie had been found guilty, she could have been expelled from the University of Leeds entirely. Lord Young wrote to the Vice-Chancellor urging her to call off the disciplinary proceedings. When that failed, the Free Speech Union instructed an external barrister, who helped draft a 16-page legal defence. It worked, and Connie was able to complete her degree. However, she was told she could not speak publicly about the ordeal, or she could face further disciplinary action. Connie completed her degree and graduated in July 2025. She is now the External Affairs Officer at the Free Speech Union and a contributor to GB News. The attempts to cancel her seriously backfired. Watch Connie’s story below 👇

The Free Speech Union

19,029 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад