Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

📅 Thursday's #303OTD was... 𝟭𝟬𝗧𝗛 𝗦𝗘𝗣𝗧𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥 2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣5️⃣ 📺+ 𝘚𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘔𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘺 & 𝘛𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘴 🎵 Track list with peak chart pos 1. 𝘖𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘴—The Importance Of Being Idle 2. 𝘙𝘢𝘻𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵—Somewhere Else 4. 𝘎𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘱—Ooh La La 1. 𝘎𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘻—DARE 9. 𝘞𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘦𝘴—Blue Orchid

Ceefax303's profile picture

Ceefax 303

8,342 subscribers

215,040 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

SanatMüzik#303OTD
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

1 Yorum

Thomas profil fotoğrafı
Thomas15 gün önce

The order of the team line ups is frying me

Benzer Videolar

🚨 THREAD: Why I started investigating Mayor Zohran Mamdani (and why this isn’t going away) Watch this first ⬇️ 1/ Let me be very clear. I didn’t go looking for this story. This started with ONE simple question: Where did a donation actually go? 2/ Money that was supposed to go to a nonprofit in Astoria, Queens… …was allegedly redirected somewhere else. So I asked questions. Like anyone should. 3/ And instead of transparency? I got THREATS. Not from the Mayor. Not from the nonprofit. From a MUSIC PRODUCER. 4/ Let that sink in. A random person with no official role felt bold enough to intimidate me… Over questions about MONEY. Why? 5/ Ask yourself this: Why would anyone be angry about someone asking where THEIR donation went? Why the pressure? Why the silence? 6/ That’s when I knew— This isn’t just about one donation. This is about something bigger. 7/ I was actually contacted about this last year. At the time, I didn’t act on it. Now I understand why it was brought to me. 8/ The more I look into this, the more questions come up. And the reactions I’ve received? Only confirm I’m on the right track. 9/ I’m not backing down. If you have nothing to hide, questions shouldn’t be a problem. 10/ Watch the video. Share it. Ask questions. Because I don’t think this story ends here. JD Vance please look into the nonprofit food distributions in Queens and the Bronx! JD Vance
5:25

🚨 THREAD: Why I started investigating Mayor Zohran Mamdani (and why this isn’t going away) Watch this first ⬇️ 1/ Let me be very clear. I didn’t go looking for this story. This started with ONE simple question: Where did a donation actually go? 2/ Money that was supposed to go to a nonprofit in Astoria, Queens… …was allegedly redirected somewhere else. So I asked questions. Like anyone should. 3/ And instead of transparency? I got THREATS. Not from the Mayor. Not from the nonprofit. From a MUSIC PRODUCER. 4/ Let that sink in. A random person with no official role felt bold enough to intimidate me… Over questions about MONEY. Why? 5/ Ask yourself this: Why would anyone be angry about someone asking where THEIR donation went? Why the pressure? Why the silence? 6/ That’s when I knew— This isn’t just about one donation. This is about something bigger. 7/ I was actually contacted about this last year. At the time, I didn’t act on it. Now I understand why it was brought to me. 8/ The more I look into this, the more questions come up. And the reactions I’ve received? Only confirm I’m on the right track. 9/ I’m not backing down. If you have nothing to hide, questions shouldn’t be a problem. 10/ Watch the video. Share it. Ask questions. Because I don’t think this story ends here. JD Vance please look into the nonprofit food distributions in Queens and the Bronx! JD Vance

Lattina Brown, MPA 🇯🇲🇺🇸

36,339 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

WHAT YOU'VE HEARD: "MLK was shot with a .30-06 and it didn't leave an exit wound." (🔖Bookmark and share this. Arm yourself with the truth and information) Both of the above claims are false. He wasn't shot with a .30-06 and there was indeed an exit wound. The confusion arises because the fedsloppers are repeating fedslop talking points from a previous conspiracy/cover-up ass*ssination. Peak irony. Garbage in, garbage out. ▪️CLAIM 1: "IT DIDN'T LEAVE AN EXIT WOUND"▪️ In 1976-79, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the MLK assassination and determined the following: 1. Dr. Francisco's original autopsy was "DEFICIENT" because he never actually determined the complete bullet wound track. (see attachments below) 2. According to the committee's medical panel reconstruction, the bullet entered, exited & then re-entered according to this track: 1. INITIAL ENTRANCE: right cheek/face. The entrance was approximately 1 inch to the right and ½ inch below the corner of the mouth. 2. After passing through the cheek, the bullet struck and shattered the right jawbone. 3. EXIT: The bullet then exited through the bottom portion of the right side of the chin, LEAVING THE BODY. 4. Before re-entering the body, the bullet crossed through the upper-neck clothing. MLK's shirt collar was perforated and torn, his tie was completely torn in half, and the suit jacket lapel was struck tangentially in its edge, tearing the inner lining. 5. SECONDARY RE-ENTRY: The bullet re-entered the base of the neck just above the right collarbone. 6. From the neck re-entry, the bullet continued right-to-left, front-to-back, and downward, injuring the jugular vein, carotid artery, subclavian artery, and vertebral artery. 7. Additional soft-tissue injuries included a submucosal hemorrhage of the larynx and an intrapulmonary hematoma at the top of the right upper lung as consequences of being adjacent to the wound path, but they were not penetrated by the bullet itself. 8. As the bullet continued leftward/backward, the first and second ribs—particularly their posterior portions near where they join the spine—were fractured and displaced. 9. There was extensive destruction of bone around the lowest cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae, corresponding to C7 and T1, and there was a major, corresponding devastating spinal-cord injury. 10. The remaining bullet fragment continued into the left upper back and stopped just beneath the skin, approximately 3 inches left of the spinal midline. IOW, it very nearly exited the body a 2nd time. BULLET PATH & DAMAGE SUMMARY: Right cheek entrance → fractured right jaw → mouth → lower-right chin exit → shirt collar + tie + jacket lapel edge damage → neck re-entry above right clavicle → jugular vein + carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries + major nerves → posterior 1st/2nd ribs → C7/T1 spinal column → severe spinal-cord injury → left upper back subcutaneous termination. So the bullet entered, hit one of the strongest bones in the body, EXITED, then re-entered, did a ton more damage, and nearly exited again. But even that's not the whole story. ▪️CLAIM #2: "HE WAS SHOT WITH A .30-06"▪️ Let's review the alleged murder weapon & bullet. 1. The *FBI tested the Remington 760 Gamemaster—the alleged murder weapon—and found its sighting to be off by 3 inches TO THE RIGHT and down about an inch. This is important because the Select Committee found that the fatal bullet struck King nearly STRAIGHT ON to the RIGHT SIDE of his face. Did James Earl Ray aim to the left of King's head? Absurd. If he'd aimed for center head, it should have hit King 3 inches over to the right on the LEFT SIDE of his face, but it didn't. It him over to the left, on the right side of his face. (*Assuming the FBI can even be trusted, since it was spying on MLK, and helped spring James Earl Ray from jail to set him up as patsy. The DOJ has never released these files or the targets from the "test" to support its claim). 2. Surprise! Complete ballistics were never originally performed on the death slug. Only enough to claim that the death slug was "consistent" with a round of 30-06 ammunition. (sound familiar?) The ballistics evidence at that point couldn't exclude or affirm the gun as the murder weapon (again, sound familiar?) However, as the last judge overseeing the case before James Earl Ray died, Joe Brown finally ordered full ballistics testing performed. It was then found that the death slug did NOT match the Remington 760 Gamemaster: The death slug had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 11.25 inches. The alleged murder weapon (the Remington 760 Gamemaster) had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 10 inches plus a bad manufacturing defect not found on the death slug, thereby excluding the gun as the murder weapon. (see video below) 3. Of secondary importance, the death slug did not metallurgically match 4 of the 5 unfired .30-06 rounds left in the drop bundle along with the gun. The compromised FBI acknowledges this mismatch, but says "Not so fast, none of the 4 unspent rounds match each other, either, but the 5th round is consistent with the death slug." IOW, the FBI's position was: the 4 rounds don't match each other, so this test isn't meaningful, except when there is a match to the 5th round, then it's meaningful. lol 4. Judge Brown asserts the death slug was actually a special subsonic NATO 7.62 round shot from an XM-21 rifle with a suppressor to slow the projectile down to less than supersonic velocity. (see video below) As I said above, the death slug was determined to be "consistent with" a .30-06. Well, 7.62 & .30-06 are indeed the same diameter. So a 7.62 slug will "be consistent with" a .30-06 slug, especially after the amount of degradation seen on the King slug (it lost about 2/3 of its material along the wound track). Furthermore, subsonic 7.62 ammunition is designed to travel around only 1,000 fps, rather than the standard round's speed of about 2,800 fps. The astute will realize that such a reduced velocity will have far less destructive power and penetrating force—which helps explain why the slug that hit MLK only exited once and then pinballed around a bit after it re-entered his body, lacking the penetrating power to exit a 2nd time. 5. After allegedly shooting MLK, the Remington 760 Gamemaster, the unspent bullets, the alleged spent shell casing from the alleged death shot, and all of his possessions (including pliers & a tack hammer—just missing a screwdriver!) were allegedly dropped in a nice, neat bundle wrapped in a blanket by James Earl Ray in the doorway of Canipe's Amusements just before he reached his car for the perfect getaway. Doesn't that all just sound convenient and familiar? 'Yes, I got away clean, but first Ima leave all this stuff behind to incriminate myself.' (see attachment below) Doesn't that sound like someone else who left the gun & unspent bullets wrapped in a nice bundle in a towel before reaching his car fire a clean gateway? A gun that BTW can't be matched to the alleged death bullet—but is "consistent" with it! It's like there's a playbook for these set-ups. Lol. Lmfao. Why hasn't the FBI released Tyler Robinson's Mauser back to the state of Utah? Has its sighting been tested after Tyler allegedly stuffed it in his pants and walked it all over campus? Why hasn't the FBI made it available to Tyler's defense for examination and testing? What are they afraid of? ********** In the 1999 civil trial verdict, a jury was allowed to examine much of this evidence (and more) in a court of law for the first time. Based on what I've summarized here and other voluminous evidence & testimony, the jury determined that King was assassinated by Loyd Jowers and a government conspiracy/cover-up. That is the ONLY OFFICIAL FINDING from a court of law in this case. Yet these dolts and sloppers continue to spread the fedslop narrative from MLK's case in order to affirm the fedslop narrative in the Charlie Kirk case. Garbage in, garbage out. How compromised do you have to be to not only pledge your allegiance to the fedslop now, but also to a 58-year old fedslop narrative that was already negated by a court of law 27 years ago? Lol
3:19

WHAT YOU'VE HEARD: "MLK was shot with a .30-06 and it didn't leave an exit wound." (🔖Bookmark and share this. Arm yourself with the truth and information) Both of the above claims are false. He wasn't shot with a .30-06 and there was indeed an exit wound. The confusion arises because the fedsloppers are repeating fedslop talking points from a previous conspiracy/cover-up ass*ssination. Peak irony. Garbage in, garbage out. ▪️CLAIM 1: "IT DIDN'T LEAVE AN EXIT WOUND"▪️ In 1976-79, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the MLK assassination and determined the following: 1. Dr. Francisco's original autopsy was "DEFICIENT" because he never actually determined the complete bullet wound track. (see attachments below) 2. According to the committee's medical panel reconstruction, the bullet entered, exited & then re-entered according to this track: 1. INITIAL ENTRANCE: right cheek/face. The entrance was approximately 1 inch to the right and ½ inch below the corner of the mouth. 2. After passing through the cheek, the bullet struck and shattered the right jawbone. 3. EXIT: The bullet then exited through the bottom portion of the right side of the chin, LEAVING THE BODY. 4. Before re-entering the body, the bullet crossed through the upper-neck clothing. MLK's shirt collar was perforated and torn, his tie was completely torn in half, and the suit jacket lapel was struck tangentially in its edge, tearing the inner lining. 5. SECONDARY RE-ENTRY: The bullet re-entered the base of the neck just above the right collarbone. 6. From the neck re-entry, the bullet continued right-to-left, front-to-back, and downward, injuring the jugular vein, carotid artery, subclavian artery, and vertebral artery. 7. Additional soft-tissue injuries included a submucosal hemorrhage of the larynx and an intrapulmonary hematoma at the top of the right upper lung as consequences of being adjacent to the wound path, but they were not penetrated by the bullet itself. 8. As the bullet continued leftward/backward, the first and second ribs—particularly their posterior portions near where they join the spine—were fractured and displaced. 9. There was extensive destruction of bone around the lowest cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae, corresponding to C7 and T1, and there was a major, corresponding devastating spinal-cord injury. 10. The remaining bullet fragment continued into the left upper back and stopped just beneath the skin, approximately 3 inches left of the spinal midline. IOW, it very nearly exited the body a 2nd time. BULLET PATH & DAMAGE SUMMARY: Right cheek entrance → fractured right jaw → mouth → lower-right chin exit → shirt collar + tie + jacket lapel edge damage → neck re-entry above right clavicle → jugular vein + carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries + major nerves → posterior 1st/2nd ribs → C7/T1 spinal column → severe spinal-cord injury → left upper back subcutaneous termination. So the bullet entered, hit one of the strongest bones in the body, EXITED, then re-entered, did a ton more damage, and nearly exited again. But even that's not the whole story. ▪️CLAIM #2: "HE WAS SHOT WITH A .30-06"▪️ Let's review the alleged murder weapon & bullet. 1. The *FBI tested the Remington 760 Gamemaster—the alleged murder weapon—and found its sighting to be off by 3 inches TO THE RIGHT and down about an inch. This is important because the Select Committee found that the fatal bullet struck King nearly STRAIGHT ON to the RIGHT SIDE of his face. Did James Earl Ray aim to the left of King's head? Absurd. If he'd aimed for center head, it should have hit King 3 inches over to the right on the LEFT SIDE of his face, but it didn't. It him over to the left, on the right side of his face. (*Assuming the FBI can even be trusted, since it was spying on MLK, and helped spring James Earl Ray from jail to set him up as patsy. The DOJ has never released these files or the targets from the "test" to support its claim). 2. Surprise! Complete ballistics were never originally performed on the death slug. Only enough to claim that the death slug was "consistent" with a round of 30-06 ammunition. (sound familiar?) The ballistics evidence at that point couldn't exclude or affirm the gun as the murder weapon (again, sound familiar?) However, as the last judge overseeing the case before James Earl Ray died, Joe Brown finally ordered full ballistics testing performed. It was then found that the death slug did NOT match the Remington 760 Gamemaster: The death slug had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 11.25 inches. The alleged murder weapon (the Remington 760 Gamemaster) had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 10 inches plus a bad manufacturing defect not found on the death slug, thereby excluding the gun as the murder weapon. (see video below) 3. Of secondary importance, the death slug did not metallurgically match 4 of the 5 unfired .30-06 rounds left in the drop bundle along with the gun. The compromised FBI acknowledges this mismatch, but says "Not so fast, none of the 4 unspent rounds match each other, either, but the 5th round is consistent with the death slug." IOW, the FBI's position was: the 4 rounds don't match each other, so this test isn't meaningful, except when there is a match to the 5th round, then it's meaningful. lol 4. Judge Brown asserts the death slug was actually a special subsonic NATO 7.62 round shot from an XM-21 rifle with a suppressor to slow the projectile down to less than supersonic velocity. (see video below) As I said above, the death slug was determined to be "consistent with" a .30-06. Well, 7.62 & .30-06 are indeed the same diameter. So a 7.62 slug will "be consistent with" a .30-06 slug, especially after the amount of degradation seen on the King slug (it lost about 2/3 of its material along the wound track). Furthermore, subsonic 7.62 ammunition is designed to travel around only 1,000 fps, rather than the standard round's speed of about 2,800 fps. The astute will realize that such a reduced velocity will have far less destructive power and penetrating force—which helps explain why the slug that hit MLK only exited once and then pinballed around a bit after it re-entered his body, lacking the penetrating power to exit a 2nd time. 5. After allegedly shooting MLK, the Remington 760 Gamemaster, the unspent bullets, the alleged spent shell casing from the alleged death shot, and all of his possessions (including pliers & a tack hammer—just missing a screwdriver!) were allegedly dropped in a nice, neat bundle wrapped in a blanket by James Earl Ray in the doorway of Canipe's Amusements just before he reached his car for the perfect getaway. Doesn't that all just sound convenient and familiar? 'Yes, I got away clean, but first Ima leave all this stuff behind to incriminate myself.' (see attachment below) Doesn't that sound like someone else who left the gun & unspent bullets wrapped in a nice bundle in a towel before reaching his car fire a clean gateway? A gun that BTW can't be matched to the alleged death bullet—but is "consistent" with it! It's like there's a playbook for these set-ups. Lol. Lmfao. Why hasn't the FBI released Tyler Robinson's Mauser back to the state of Utah? Has its sighting been tested after Tyler allegedly stuffed it in his pants and walked it all over campus? Why hasn't the FBI made it available to Tyler's defense for examination and testing? What are they afraid of? ********** In the 1999 civil trial verdict, a jury was allowed to examine much of this evidence (and more) in a court of law for the first time. Based on what I've summarized here and other voluminous evidence & testimony, the jury determined that King was assassinated by Loyd Jowers and a government conspiracy/cover-up. That is the ONLY OFFICIAL FINDING from a court of law in this case. Yet these dolts and sloppers continue to spread the fedslop narrative from MLK's case in order to affirm the fedslop narrative in the Charlie Kirk case. Garbage in, garbage out. How compromised do you have to be to not only pledge your allegiance to the fedslop now, but also to a 58-year old fedslop narrative that was already negated by a court of law 27 years ago? Lol

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

70,460 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Listen to Joakim Simiyu then read; The advantage of being eloquent is that you can lie without being noticed, the inconsistencies will pass your audience while they are absorbed in the flow your words. 1) Kidero was never the Chairman of Mumias Sugar, he was the CEO, operating under the direction of the board. 2) The highest profit ever made in the history of Mumias Sugar was 2b made in 2012 during Kidero's tenure as CEO. So where did the 6b tax every year come from? 3) Kidero is the one who returned Mumias Sugar to profit making and the profit making ended when Kidero left. 4) The fact that imported Sugar could over-compete local sugar was not a local leaders problem but a national government problem - Kibaki's. 5) Simiyu should not expect every luo to be a fisherman especially when there are no roads to the landing beaches. 6) Construction of roads has never been in the hands of local leaders. Even now with devolution, it is not. 7) No luo has ever complained about Kikuyus owning media houses, in any case it's one Kikuyu called SK Macharia, the rest are miniature stations. They have only noted that they control the media houses. 8) Telling us that Achieng Oneko was the first information minister is a correct answer to the wrong question. Owning the media was only liberalised in the early 90s, long after Oneko had left. And what was Oneko suppose to do to the luos in media ownership. 9) Marginalisation has nothing to do with individual business ownership, that people can do from any part of the country. It is about infrastructure and public appointments. 10) It's not only Luo complaining about marginalisation. 11) The luo have never complained about land titles. By the way where have those petitions Simiyu is talking about worked? Since he started ranting about leadership, what has he changed? 12) The marginalisation complaints are not against individual leaders like Kagombe but against the government of the time. 13) Simiyu's arguments are just comic, fit for entertainment. He is better at the bunge la Wananchi. Jevanjee or Jakaranda would be great! Finally, Marginalisation and bad leadership are not mutually exclusive. The can exist concurrently.
9:37

Listen to Joakim Simiyu then read; The advantage of being eloquent is that you can lie without being noticed, the inconsistencies will pass your audience while they are absorbed in the flow your words. 1) Kidero was never the Chairman of Mumias Sugar, he was the CEO, operating under the direction of the board. 2) The highest profit ever made in the history of Mumias Sugar was 2b made in 2012 during Kidero's tenure as CEO. So where did the 6b tax every year come from? 3) Kidero is the one who returned Mumias Sugar to profit making and the profit making ended when Kidero left. 4) The fact that imported Sugar could over-compete local sugar was not a local leaders problem but a national government problem - Kibaki's. 5) Simiyu should not expect every luo to be a fisherman especially when there are no roads to the landing beaches. 6) Construction of roads has never been in the hands of local leaders. Even now with devolution, it is not. 7) No luo has ever complained about Kikuyus owning media houses, in any case it's one Kikuyu called SK Macharia, the rest are miniature stations. They have only noted that they control the media houses. 8) Telling us that Achieng Oneko was the first information minister is a correct answer to the wrong question. Owning the media was only liberalised in the early 90s, long after Oneko had left. And what was Oneko suppose to do to the luos in media ownership. 9) Marginalisation has nothing to do with individual business ownership, that people can do from any part of the country. It is about infrastructure and public appointments. 10) It's not only Luo complaining about marginalisation. 11) The luo have never complained about land titles. By the way where have those petitions Simiyu is talking about worked? Since he started ranting about leadership, what has he changed? 12) The marginalisation complaints are not against individual leaders like Kagombe but against the government of the time. 13) Simiyu's arguments are just comic, fit for entertainment. He is better at the bunge la Wananchi. Jevanjee or Jakaranda would be great! Finally, Marginalisation and bad leadership are not mutually exclusive. The can exist concurrently.

Odoyo Owidi

20,076 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨12-HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. 🇲🇲 A 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck central Myanmar, killing at least 59 and causing a Bangkok skyscraper collapse that left 2 dead and dozens trapped. 2. 🇮🇱 Israel launched its first airstrike on Beirut since November in response to rocket attacks from Lebanon, escalating regional tensions. 3. 🇺🇸 Trump vowed to overhaul Washington, DC with a law-and-order-focused “MAGA makeover,” calling the city a “nightmare of murder and crime.” 4. 🇬🇱 Greenland's government rejected meetings with JD Vance, Usha, and a Trump-aligned delegation, labeling the surprise visit “highly aggressive.” 5. 🇷🇺 Putin endorsed Trump’s Greenland ambitions and proposed joint Arctic, nuclear, and Mars missions involving Elon. 6. 🇺🇸 Elon warned the U.S. is at risk of collapse without successful debt reduction, as federal agencies face deep budget cuts. 7. 🇺🇸 Trump granted clemency to Nikola founder Trevor Milton, who claimed his fraud conviction was retaliation for being anti-establishment. 8. 🇺🇸 A federal judge slammed LA Mayor Karen Bass after a $2.5 billion homeless audit revealed major accounting failures and potential budget takeover. 9. 🇹🇷 Turkey arrested Mehmet Pehlivan, lawyer for opposition leader Imamoglu, sparking backlash and claims of politically motivated lawfare. David Pollack
2:26

🚨12-HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. 🇲🇲 A 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck central Myanmar, killing at least 59 and causing a Bangkok skyscraper collapse that left 2 dead and dozens trapped. 2. 🇮🇱 Israel launched its first airstrike on Beirut since November in response to rocket attacks from Lebanon, escalating regional tensions. 3. 🇺🇸 Trump vowed to overhaul Washington, DC with a law-and-order-focused “MAGA makeover,” calling the city a “nightmare of murder and crime.” 4. 🇬🇱 Greenland's government rejected meetings with JD Vance, Usha, and a Trump-aligned delegation, labeling the surprise visit “highly aggressive.” 5. 🇷🇺 Putin endorsed Trump’s Greenland ambitions and proposed joint Arctic, nuclear, and Mars missions involving Elon. 6. 🇺🇸 Elon warned the U.S. is at risk of collapse without successful debt reduction, as federal agencies face deep budget cuts. 7. 🇺🇸 Trump granted clemency to Nikola founder Trevor Milton, who claimed his fraud conviction was retaliation for being anti-establishment. 8. 🇺🇸 A federal judge slammed LA Mayor Karen Bass after a $2.5 billion homeless audit revealed major accounting failures and potential budget takeover. 9. 🇹🇷 Turkey arrested Mehmet Pehlivan, lawyer for opposition leader Imamoglu, sparking backlash and claims of politically motivated lawfare. David Pollack

Mario Nawfal

573,489 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Here is ENDO’s story & likely LAST day on earth…..😭💔 1 DAY left 2 LIVE ENDO #A2261627 DIES ON THURSDAY 4/9 Endo's story is heartbreaking: He arrived at the shelter just a few weeks ago. His owner, a homeless veteran, surrendered him because he no longer had a home and the housing he applied for would take months to get. Through tears, he told a volunteer he no longer had a home and the housing he applied for would take months to get. He told a volunteer how much he loved him, how Endo loved kids, how he hoped that the shelter would find him a good home. Endo, like a lot of dogs, had a rough first day at the shelter. Who wouldn't be scared in such a loud and chaotic place? Staff used an ACD pole on him, which only made him more terrified, and this poor boy, on his very first day at the shelter, was added to the "urgent" list, solidifying his eventual place on the euthanasia list Endo has been in playgroup a few times. He's been described as both tolerant and selective. He’s not done anything except look uncomfortable with collaring and was assertive with males in his most recent session. Volunteers who have spent time with him find him to be a sweet and sensitive boy who is open to affection and seems to find comfort in it once he trusts you. A staff member took him for a walk shortly after he arrived, hoping to help him acclimate, and she was able to handle him without issue, even got him vaccinated without any concerns Now Endo is ALERTED & DEADLINED for “behavioral concerns in the shelter” with a recent note stating he barked and growled at a supervisor in his recent note. He dies on THURSDAY 4/9 anytime after 8AM. Endo is available for foster, adoption, or rescue. He needs a responsible, breed savvy human who can give him the time to decompress and gain his trust. He is waiting at South LA Shelter. ENDO #A2261627 is 2 yrs old, 106 Ibs. Shelter hours:Tues-Fri 8am-5pm Sat & Sun 11am-5pm | Mon emergencies only South LA / Chesterfield Square Animal Shelter 1850 W. 60th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90047 323-565-2161 or 888-452-7381 Rescues please contact email:catherine.lee@lacity.orgjasmin e.poblano@lacity.orgmatthew.speas e@lacity.orgraneshia.mccruter@laci ty.orgroman.rincon@lacity.org w @download_repost_pro
1:08

Here is ENDO’s story & likely LAST day on earth…..😭💔 1 DAY left 2 LIVE ENDO #A2261627 DIES ON THURSDAY 4/9 Endo's story is heartbreaking: He arrived at the shelter just a few weeks ago. His owner, a homeless veteran, surrendered him because he no longer had a home and the housing he applied for would take months to get. Through tears, he told a volunteer he no longer had a home and the housing he applied for would take months to get. He told a volunteer how much he loved him, how Endo loved kids, how he hoped that the shelter would find him a good home. Endo, like a lot of dogs, had a rough first day at the shelter. Who wouldn't be scared in such a loud and chaotic place? Staff used an ACD pole on him, which only made him more terrified, and this poor boy, on his very first day at the shelter, was added to the "urgent" list, solidifying his eventual place on the euthanasia list Endo has been in playgroup a few times. He's been described as both tolerant and selective. He’s not done anything except look uncomfortable with collaring and was assertive with males in his most recent session. Volunteers who have spent time with him find him to be a sweet and sensitive boy who is open to affection and seems to find comfort in it once he trusts you. A staff member took him for a walk shortly after he arrived, hoping to help him acclimate, and she was able to handle him without issue, even got him vaccinated without any concerns Now Endo is ALERTED & DEADLINED for “behavioral concerns in the shelter” with a recent note stating he barked and growled at a supervisor in his recent note. He dies on THURSDAY 4/9 anytime after 8AM. Endo is available for foster, adoption, or rescue. He needs a responsible, breed savvy human who can give him the time to decompress and gain his trust. He is waiting at South LA Shelter. ENDO #A2261627 is 2 yrs old, 106 Ibs. Shelter hours:Tues-Fri 8am-5pm Sat & Sun 11am-5pm | Mon emergencies only South LA / Chesterfield Square Animal Shelter 1850 W. 60th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90047 323-565-2161 or 888-452-7381 Rescues please contact email:[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]@laci [email protected] w @download_repost_pro

RoCo🇬🇧God Save The King🇬🇧

19,210 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Precision meets poetry — that's how I describe the writing of Ava. She's grown her newsletter audience to more than 24,000 people and just laid out her writing process in extreme detail. Here's what she's taught me about writing well: 1. If someone’s much better than you at something they probably try much harder. 2. Personal anecdotes breathe life into your writing. First-hand experience gives you credibility as a writer and doubles as a wellspring for some of your deepest wisdom. 3. Writing is an altered state of consciousness, analogous to being drunk or deep in a meditative state. 4. Good personal writing describes the core truths of the human experience while avoiding self-help jargon. 5. When you write from life and not theory, you will be most able to create something that feels unpolluted by all the ideas you’ve consumed. 6. Writing is a tool to reach beyond consensus. Write and write and write until you transcend the cliches and step into undiscovered territory. 7. Writing is also a tool for knowing, shaping, and owning your story. Ava says: “Instead of relying on someone else to narrativize my life or offer an observation about me, I use writing as a way to assert my own narrative. It’s how I remain more subject than object, how I maintain conviction in my own agency.” 8. Creativity is inherently anti-authoritarian. As in: to be successfully creative, you have to shed the part of yourself that desperately wants reassurance. It’s only then that you can escape cliche and escape paradigmatic thinking. 9. Chase what feels valuable to you, even if doing so leads to eye-rolling reactions. Ava was told by her parents to pursue programming because “liberal arts is worthless,” only to hear tech bros say that writing is the most valuable skill in the world. 10. Writing is the creative residue of all the background rumination you do as you go through life (such as sitting in friends' living rooms, taking your dog to the park, getting dehydrated during a hike). 11. How Ava thinks about writing in public: Weigh the importance of feeling safe with the importance of being known. 12. Ava on how writing is sometimes not an act, but a state of being: “I’m trying to think of writing less as doing and more as being. A passive state, almost: a way of existing in the world. Something that takes me away from myself, and in doing so draws me deeper inwards.” This is a masterclass in writing from the heart — expressing emotions, creating a sense of intimacy in your writing, and bringing your soul onto the page. Full episode below.
1:18:44

Precision meets poetry — that's how I describe the writing of Ava. She's grown her newsletter audience to more than 24,000 people and just laid out her writing process in extreme detail. Here's what she's taught me about writing well: 1. If someone’s much better than you at something they probably try much harder. 2. Personal anecdotes breathe life into your writing. First-hand experience gives you credibility as a writer and doubles as a wellspring for some of your deepest wisdom. 3. Writing is an altered state of consciousness, analogous to being drunk or deep in a meditative state. 4. Good personal writing describes the core truths of the human experience while avoiding self-help jargon. 5. When you write from life and not theory, you will be most able to create something that feels unpolluted by all the ideas you’ve consumed. 6. Writing is a tool to reach beyond consensus. Write and write and write until you transcend the cliches and step into undiscovered territory. 7. Writing is also a tool for knowing, shaping, and owning your story. Ava says: “Instead of relying on someone else to narrativize my life or offer an observation about me, I use writing as a way to assert my own narrative. It’s how I remain more subject than object, how I maintain conviction in my own agency.” 8. Creativity is inherently anti-authoritarian. As in: to be successfully creative, you have to shed the part of yourself that desperately wants reassurance. It’s only then that you can escape cliche and escape paradigmatic thinking. 9. Chase what feels valuable to you, even if doing so leads to eye-rolling reactions. Ava was told by her parents to pursue programming because “liberal arts is worthless,” only to hear tech bros say that writing is the most valuable skill in the world. 10. Writing is the creative residue of all the background rumination you do as you go through life (such as sitting in friends' living rooms, taking your dog to the park, getting dehydrated during a hike). 11. How Ava thinks about writing in public: Weigh the importance of feeling safe with the importance of being known. 12. Ava on how writing is sometimes not an act, but a state of being: “I’m trying to think of writing less as doing and more as being. A passive state, almost: a way of existing in the world. Something that takes me away from myself, and in doing so draws me deeper inwards.” This is a masterclass in writing from the heart — expressing emotions, creating a sense of intimacy in your writing, and bringing your soul onto the page. Full episode below.

David Perell

87,842 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Ron Unz (The Unz Review) discusses his intellectual upbringing and involvement in Holocaust research with Holocaust researcher Germar Rudolf (Germar Rudolf (* 1964)) and free market activist Jorge Besada. 00:28 Jorge introduces German chemist and leading Holocaust researcher Germar Rudolf who spent nearly 4 years in jail for writing a chemistry report that questions the mainstream mass-gassings narrative and thus allegedly “inciting racial hatred”. 02:54 Jorge introduces Jewish-born entrepreneur and author Ron Unz who has degrees in Physics and Ancient History from Harvard. Runs 05:00 Jorge briefly explains how from freedom emerges economic and intellectual competition which inadvertently turns mankind into a super-computer as companies innovate and copy each other’s innovations, as well as superior morals as hard-working people motivate everyone else to be likewise. 05:50 Ron tells us about his life, Jewish cultural influence-identity or lack thereof, early views on Holocaust. 09:15 Ron begins to get suspicious regarding Holocaust due to disastrous-flawed media coverage of Iraq war after 9/11. Mainstream media lost credibility. 10:42 Ron digitizes old publications and discusses ramifications of doing so. 14:20 Ron archives Reason magazine and eventually stumbles upon Holocaust-related issue and controversy surrounding it. 18:04 Ron praises issue and brings up fact that 2 leading editors were Jewish. 21:22 Arthur Butz, another prominent Holocaust mass-gassings doubter has Masters in Electrical Engineering from MIT. 21:50 Ron emphasizes how Libertarians were early prominent leaders in spreading Holocaust-doubt-revisionism. 23:28 Ron speculates that the Reason issue relating to the Holocaust was due to the coming release of Arthur Butz’s ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century’ 26:24 Ron praises Butz’s book and especially so Nicholas Kollerstrom’s ‘Breaking the Spell. The Holocaust: Myth & Reality’ 30:27 Jorge mentions how since Libertarians are better defenders of freedom, they get the benefits of superior competition of ideas and busting of myths-lies which helps explain why so many are Holocaust revisionists-deniers. Asks Ron a out how important was for him to lear that freedom giant Murray Rothbard, who is likely Milei’s favorite economist, was a revisiojnist-Denier. Ron elaborates. 34:55 Ron describes how it was books that were pro-mainstream-Holocast that persuaded him the most about the myth-story of the Holocaust. Discusses Deborah Lipstadt. 40:42 Ron brings up how lead soviet prosecutor in Nuremberg Trials , Andrey Vyshinsky, was same fraudulent prosecutor who oversaw Stalin’s bogus ‘Great Purge-‘Shows Trials’. 41:30 Ron brings up how aspects of Holocaust mythology are abandoned with time like alleged mass-gassings or death camps on German soil. 45:05 Ron mentions how Robert Faurisson(french revisionist) stressed how neither Churchill’s, nor, Eisenhower’s, nor Charles de Gaul’s massive post-war writings mentioned anything about the Holocaust. 48:56 Ron brings up book ‘The Jewish Threat: Anti-semitic Politics Of The U.s. Army’ by Joseph W. Bendersky, and how not a single American intelligence officer or top generals believed in holocaust stories. 50:15 Ron discusses John Beaty’s book ‘The Iron Curtain Over America’ 1:14:40 Ron argues that the reason why neither Churchill, nor Eisenhower, nor Charles de Gaul mentioned anything about the Holocaust is because they didn’t believe it and didn’t want to be seen as having fallen for war-time propaganda-myths in posterity. 1:17:29 Germar mentions how John Beaty may not have been able to better back his claims about intelligence officers not believing holocaust because it was not until year 2000 that UK finally released secret information about decrypts, so Beaty would have been breaking law. 1:19:18 Jorge brings up how Churchill knew the Soviets had committed the Katyn Forest massacre and introduced fake evidence at Nuremberg Trial blaming Germans for it, thus knew mass-gassings also likely fabrications thus not risk including them in his books to look like a fool in the future. 1:22:08 Ron discusses the Venona project, US spying on soviet spies working high up in Roosevelt admin. Even top American who kept project running and held erroneous anti-Jewish ideas, never believed anything about holocaust. 1:28:09 Jorge, backing Beaty’s claim that Jews were overwhelmingly responsible for bringing about WWII to destroy Hitler, brings up leading Zionist Chaim Weizmann stating that WWII “is our war..We are…giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are…providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going.” The solution to Hitler’s anti-Jewish fallacies was NOT a world war that killed 80+ million people. 1:29:39 Ron brings up how an increasing number of books today make similar point, but not as portraying Jews as dragging us into an unnecessary war, but as heroes helping annihilate the evil Hitler. 1:31:07 Ron disagrees with Jorge’s earlier statement and downplays Jew’s importance compared to Roosevelt's desire to have a war to allegedly get the US out of depression. 1:34:50 Ron brings up importance of Kristallnacht for getting Roosevelt and Jews to push war vs. Germany. 1:38:29 Germar further elaborates on how Nazi government’s cruel handling of Kristallnacht (forbade insurance companies to pay Jews, large collective fine on Jews as well) did make it easy for many to further vilify Nazi government and help move to war. 1:43:58 Jorge: ‘What are 3-5 major arguments the layperson came make to criticize mainstream holo myths?’ Ron mentions digging where hundreds of thousands of bodies are supposed to be buried. 1:49:12 Germar explains how ‘deep penetrating radar’ and other things have been tried and still no evidence to support mainstream claims. 1:52:43 Jorge summarizes simple arguments against mainstream myth discussed: 1) ground checks fail to show mass graves,2) Nuremberg Trial obvious fake evidence introduced by Soviets like brain bashing pedal-driven machine, atomic bomb-like device to blow up 20,000 Jews, etc. 3) Top Soviet prosecutor Andrey Vyshinsky being same liar as in Moscow ‘Show Trials’ 4) All secret communications from Auschwitz reveal nothing about gassings, 5) Nothing in Churchill, Eisenhower, Charles de Gaul writings, 6) Main Russian archivists admit there is nothing in archives supporting Holocaust, 7) Chemical analysis per Germar 8) massive continuous downward revisions of alleged exterminations. 1:58:52 Germar elaborates on history of massive downward revisions on total deaths. 2:05:28 Ron mentions how after creation of Israel and Israel’s pivot to America, Stalin-Soviets no longer pushed Holocaust. 2:10:55 Jorge summarizes how the mainstream Holocaust myth (NOT conspiracy) evolved. Holocaust exaggerations began as way for Poles-Soviets-Communists to punish Germany but understandably attracted and was amplified by Jews, especially Zionist ideology-believing ones. Per Germar, the key leading historian and judges who did most to create mainstream holocaust myth were not even Jewish. 2:13:00 Ron agrees with summary and believes that most of today’s Holocaust academics are not lying as part of some grand conspiracy by believe their mythical narrative. 2:14:26 Jorge brings up astute ending to Ron’s Holocaust article where he compared Holocaustianity to Socialist mythology and the USSR, both myths similarly superficially examined, sustained by coercion, and that could quickly collapse. 2:16:40 Jorge asks Ron: “Where do you see things headed?” 2:17:40 Jorge asks… Mahmoud Abbas, Bashar al Assad, Alexander Dugin, Judge Napolitano frequent guest Phil Giraldi all are prominent doubters, Sergey Lavrov loves watching Napolitano… How much of the Russia-Ukraine war is due to Zionism and are there significant chances that many high up in Russian government are Holocaust doubters-revisionists? 2:22:41 Jorge blames the seeming irrationality of US government looking for conflict with Russia and China as inevitable outgrowth of Holcaustianized Zionism which has made Bibi our Pope getting more than one standing ovation per minute in US congress. Ron mentions how of course everyone is a next Hitler to be militarily destroyed. 2:24:52 Ron sees massive collapse of the West which will bring down Holocaust myths with it. 2:25:55 Germar asks Ron about personal repercussions regarding his open Holocaust skepticism, lost friendships, etc. 2:34:15 Jorge brings up why Ron is such a vital intellectual. Unlike David Duke or Candace Owens who bring up good information about Jewish-related chaos, Ron is a secular Jew who does NOT make many fallacies Candace and David make like in Candace’s case referring to Bibi being influenced by Satan etc. And hopefully major podcasters like Joe Rogan soon host Ron. 2:36:06 Ron : “Maybe if one of these people had me on it could be the straw that breaks the camels back” 2:36:17 Jorge brings up how we are clearly seeing how similar to CovidMania, AntisemiteMania is about to emerge and fortunately this is leading more and more people to have the urgency and courage to deal with Zionist and Holocaust myths before it is too late. 2:39:30 Germar brings up Ron asking Germar to post his books. Ron explains he wanted to convert them to HTML but realized few were reading them that way to just abandoned the idea, especially since Germar’s site already provides all PDFs and more. 2:42:02 Jorge! “We almost went 3 hours! We will do this again!”
2:42:40

Ron Unz (The Unz Review) discusses his intellectual upbringing and involvement in Holocaust research with Holocaust researcher Germar Rudolf (Germar Rudolf (* 1964)) and free market activist Jorge Besada. 00:28 Jorge introduces German chemist and leading Holocaust researcher Germar Rudolf who spent nearly 4 years in jail for writing a chemistry report that questions the mainstream mass-gassings narrative and thus allegedly “inciting racial hatred”. 02:54 Jorge introduces Jewish-born entrepreneur and author Ron Unz who has degrees in Physics and Ancient History from Harvard. Runs 05:00 Jorge briefly explains how from freedom emerges economic and intellectual competition which inadvertently turns mankind into a super-computer as companies innovate and copy each other’s innovations, as well as superior morals as hard-working people motivate everyone else to be likewise. 05:50 Ron tells us about his life, Jewish cultural influence-identity or lack thereof, early views on Holocaust. 09:15 Ron begins to get suspicious regarding Holocaust due to disastrous-flawed media coverage of Iraq war after 9/11. Mainstream media lost credibility. 10:42 Ron digitizes old publications and discusses ramifications of doing so. 14:20 Ron archives Reason magazine and eventually stumbles upon Holocaust-related issue and controversy surrounding it. 18:04 Ron praises issue and brings up fact that 2 leading editors were Jewish. 21:22 Arthur Butz, another prominent Holocaust mass-gassings doubter has Masters in Electrical Engineering from MIT. 21:50 Ron emphasizes how Libertarians were early prominent leaders in spreading Holocaust-doubt-revisionism. 23:28 Ron speculates that the Reason issue relating to the Holocaust was due to the coming release of Arthur Butz’s ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century’ 26:24 Ron praises Butz’s book and especially so Nicholas Kollerstrom’s ‘Breaking the Spell. The Holocaust: Myth & Reality’ 30:27 Jorge mentions how since Libertarians are better defenders of freedom, they get the benefits of superior competition of ideas and busting of myths-lies which helps explain why so many are Holocaust revisionists-deniers. Asks Ron a out how important was for him to lear that freedom giant Murray Rothbard, who is likely Milei’s favorite economist, was a revisiojnist-Denier. Ron elaborates. 34:55 Ron describes how it was books that were pro-mainstream-Holocast that persuaded him the most about the myth-story of the Holocaust. Discusses Deborah Lipstadt. 40:42 Ron brings up how lead soviet prosecutor in Nuremberg Trials , Andrey Vyshinsky, was same fraudulent prosecutor who oversaw Stalin’s bogus ‘Great Purge-‘Shows Trials’. 41:30 Ron brings up how aspects of Holocaust mythology are abandoned with time like alleged mass-gassings or death camps on German soil. 45:05 Ron mentions how Robert Faurisson(french revisionist) stressed how neither Churchill’s, nor, Eisenhower’s, nor Charles de Gaul’s massive post-war writings mentioned anything about the Holocaust. 48:56 Ron brings up book ‘The Jewish Threat: Anti-semitic Politics Of The U.s. Army’ by Joseph W. Bendersky, and how not a single American intelligence officer or top generals believed in holocaust stories. 50:15 Ron discusses John Beaty’s book ‘The Iron Curtain Over America’ 1:14:40 Ron argues that the reason why neither Churchill, nor Eisenhower, nor Charles de Gaul mentioned anything about the Holocaust is because they didn’t believe it and didn’t want to be seen as having fallen for war-time propaganda-myths in posterity. 1:17:29 Germar mentions how John Beaty may not have been able to better back his claims about intelligence officers not believing holocaust because it was not until year 2000 that UK finally released secret information about decrypts, so Beaty would have been breaking law. 1:19:18 Jorge brings up how Churchill knew the Soviets had committed the Katyn Forest massacre and introduced fake evidence at Nuremberg Trial blaming Germans for it, thus knew mass-gassings also likely fabrications thus not risk including them in his books to look like a fool in the future. 1:22:08 Ron discusses the Venona project, US spying on soviet spies working high up in Roosevelt admin. Even top American who kept project running and held erroneous anti-Jewish ideas, never believed anything about holocaust. 1:28:09 Jorge, backing Beaty’s claim that Jews were overwhelmingly responsible for bringing about WWII to destroy Hitler, brings up leading Zionist Chaim Weizmann stating that WWII “is our war..We are…giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are…providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going.” The solution to Hitler’s anti-Jewish fallacies was NOT a world war that killed 80+ million people. 1:29:39 Ron brings up how an increasing number of books today make similar point, but not as portraying Jews as dragging us into an unnecessary war, but as heroes helping annihilate the evil Hitler. 1:31:07 Ron disagrees with Jorge’s earlier statement and downplays Jew’s importance compared to Roosevelt's desire to have a war to allegedly get the US out of depression. 1:34:50 Ron brings up importance of Kristallnacht for getting Roosevelt and Jews to push war vs. Germany. 1:38:29 Germar further elaborates on how Nazi government’s cruel handling of Kristallnacht (forbade insurance companies to pay Jews, large collective fine on Jews as well) did make it easy for many to further vilify Nazi government and help move to war. 1:43:58 Jorge: ‘What are 3-5 major arguments the layperson came make to criticize mainstream holo myths?’ Ron mentions digging where hundreds of thousands of bodies are supposed to be buried. 1:49:12 Germar explains how ‘deep penetrating radar’ and other things have been tried and still no evidence to support mainstream claims. 1:52:43 Jorge summarizes simple arguments against mainstream myth discussed: 1) ground checks fail to show mass graves,2) Nuremberg Trial obvious fake evidence introduced by Soviets like brain bashing pedal-driven machine, atomic bomb-like device to blow up 20,000 Jews, etc. 3) Top Soviet prosecutor Andrey Vyshinsky being same liar as in Moscow ‘Show Trials’ 4) All secret communications from Auschwitz reveal nothing about gassings, 5) Nothing in Churchill, Eisenhower, Charles de Gaul writings, 6) Main Russian archivists admit there is nothing in archives supporting Holocaust, 7) Chemical analysis per Germar 8) massive continuous downward revisions of alleged exterminations. 1:58:52 Germar elaborates on history of massive downward revisions on total deaths. 2:05:28 Ron mentions how after creation of Israel and Israel’s pivot to America, Stalin-Soviets no longer pushed Holocaust. 2:10:55 Jorge summarizes how the mainstream Holocaust myth (NOT conspiracy) evolved. Holocaust exaggerations began as way for Poles-Soviets-Communists to punish Germany but understandably attracted and was amplified by Jews, especially Zionist ideology-believing ones. Per Germar, the key leading historian and judges who did most to create mainstream holocaust myth were not even Jewish. 2:13:00 Ron agrees with summary and believes that most of today’s Holocaust academics are not lying as part of some grand conspiracy by believe their mythical narrative. 2:14:26 Jorge brings up astute ending to Ron’s Holocaust article where he compared Holocaustianity to Socialist mythology and the USSR, both myths similarly superficially examined, sustained by coercion, and that could quickly collapse. 2:16:40 Jorge asks Ron: “Where do you see things headed?” 2:17:40 Jorge asks… Mahmoud Abbas, Bashar al Assad, Alexander Dugin, Judge Napolitano frequent guest Phil Giraldi all are prominent doubters, Sergey Lavrov loves watching Napolitano… How much of the Russia-Ukraine war is due to Zionism and are there significant chances that many high up in Russian government are Holocaust doubters-revisionists? 2:22:41 Jorge blames the seeming irrationality of US government looking for conflict with Russia and China as inevitable outgrowth of Holcaustianized Zionism which has made Bibi our Pope getting more than one standing ovation per minute in US congress. Ron mentions how of course everyone is a next Hitler to be militarily destroyed. 2:24:52 Ron sees massive collapse of the West which will bring down Holocaust myths with it. 2:25:55 Germar asks Ron about personal repercussions regarding his open Holocaust skepticism, lost friendships, etc. 2:34:15 Jorge brings up why Ron is such a vital intellectual. Unlike David Duke or Candace Owens who bring up good information about Jewish-related chaos, Ron is a secular Jew who does NOT make many fallacies Candace and David make like in Candace’s case referring to Bibi being influenced by Satan etc. And hopefully major podcasters like Joe Rogan soon host Ron. 2:36:06 Ron : “Maybe if one of these people had me on it could be the straw that breaks the camels back” 2:36:17 Jorge brings up how we are clearly seeing how similar to CovidMania, AntisemiteMania is about to emerge and fortunately this is leading more and more people to have the urgency and courage to deal with Zionist and Holocaust myths before it is too late. 2:39:30 Germar brings up Ron asking Germar to post his books. Ron explains he wanted to convert them to HTML but realized few were reading them that way to just abandoned the idea, especially since Germar’s site already provides all PDFs and more. 2:42:02 Jorge! “We almost went 3 hours! We will do this again!”

Jorge Besada

16,100 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

I’m on a plane back from a week in Los Angeles and some lessons there shocked me. I met w/ a billionaire, Bryan Johnson, a top 10 podcaster, an A24 movie exec, and a Presidential candidate. 12 learnings from too many meetings to count in Hollywood: 1. LA is not dead. Far from it. I ran into 5 people who I needed to meet with at one hotel in 4 days. The epicenter of media may be disaggregating to Austin, NY and globally... but the density is still here. 2. Bryan Johnson is now one of my favorite humans. I hung with him at his house, tried his 20,000 crunches in 30 minutes machine, and talked about the purpose of life. The internet is a sad state that they don’t give him more credit. 3. Digital media today is like distributed news before cable news. We are at a tipping point for expansion in this digital industry. It feels somehow played out to those of us in it, but it’s just starting. 4. Hollywood is watching creators and UGC closely. I met w/ one exec who said in the not so distant future Netflix will have UGC on it. 5. may be this generation's Anthony Bourdain for thinking. I sat down with him and I think the work he’s doing on youtube is going to be something to watch... closely. 6. Buying boring businesses is not at all interesting to those in LA. BUT - asset accumulation and portfolios are. They buy assets (film rights, etc) all day. They are starting to think about the business of celebrities, creators and their work similar to how I think of investment management. 7. LA is a tale of two cities. I spoke at the convention center that was surrounded by derelict minority businesses and houses, then hung out at private members-only clubs that are all over West Hollywood where Lebron, Chris Voss and all the big timers play. The two places are 10 minutes away but an absolute world apart. 8. The mental health and drug crisis is out of control. Stroll along a downtown street and zombie after zombie trails. I saw people shitting and eating next to one another and across from a Starbucks. I asked our corporate host if this was “normal?” They replied, you stop noticing it after awhile. 9. Offices are completely empty. A friend got an office space for 50% off and more than 40% of the highrise is unoccupied. How odd that home prices are high, housing is really tough to come by, but office space is a blue ocean. 10. Met up with Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, a friend who was traveling to the border to see the situation live. I am grateful to have people fight for the truth even when it is unpopular. We need more leaders like her. 11. Every time I meet with a billionaire I realize all over again that to achieve that level of wealth, you cannot be normal. Truly. He’s weirdly comfortable with discomfort and complete lack of people pleasing. 12. The more I learn about the Kardashians in some ways, the more I respect them. I got the onion peeled back on their business dealings and they are some of the smartest dealmakers I’ve ever seen. Also I hate saying it because I believe gender games are net negative, but I wonder if they’d get so much hate if they weren’t females? I liked the idea of keeping a travel diary like my friend GREG ISENBERG does… Otherwise these moments pass like sand through my fingers. What do you think? I’m going to name it Where Have Ya Been or Lessons from the Road. Which do you like more?
0:49

I’m on a plane back from a week in Los Angeles and some lessons there shocked me. I met w/ a billionaire, Bryan Johnson, a top 10 podcaster, an A24 movie exec, and a Presidential candidate. 12 learnings from too many meetings to count in Hollywood: 1. LA is not dead. Far from it. I ran into 5 people who I needed to meet with at one hotel in 4 days. The epicenter of media may be disaggregating to Austin, NY and globally... but the density is still here. 2. Bryan Johnson is now one of my favorite humans. I hung with him at his house, tried his 20,000 crunches in 30 minutes machine, and talked about the purpose of life. The internet is a sad state that they don’t give him more credit. 3. Digital media today is like distributed news before cable news. We are at a tipping point for expansion in this digital industry. It feels somehow played out to those of us in it, but it’s just starting. 4. Hollywood is watching creators and UGC closely. I met w/ one exec who said in the not so distant future Netflix will have UGC on it. 5. may be this generation's Anthony Bourdain for thinking. I sat down with him and I think the work he’s doing on youtube is going to be something to watch... closely. 6. Buying boring businesses is not at all interesting to those in LA. BUT - asset accumulation and portfolios are. They buy assets (film rights, etc) all day. They are starting to think about the business of celebrities, creators and their work similar to how I think of investment management. 7. LA is a tale of two cities. I spoke at the convention center that was surrounded by derelict minority businesses and houses, then hung out at private members-only clubs that are all over West Hollywood where Lebron, Chris Voss and all the big timers play. The two places are 10 minutes away but an absolute world apart. 8. The mental health and drug crisis is out of control. Stroll along a downtown street and zombie after zombie trails. I saw people shitting and eating next to one another and across from a Starbucks. I asked our corporate host if this was “normal?” They replied, you stop noticing it after awhile. 9. Offices are completely empty. A friend got an office space for 50% off and more than 40% of the highrise is unoccupied. How odd that home prices are high, housing is really tough to come by, but office space is a blue ocean. 10. Met up with Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, a friend who was traveling to the border to see the situation live. I am grateful to have people fight for the truth even when it is unpopular. We need more leaders like her. 11. Every time I meet with a billionaire I realize all over again that to achieve that level of wealth, you cannot be normal. Truly. He’s weirdly comfortable with discomfort and complete lack of people pleasing. 12. The more I learn about the Kardashians in some ways, the more I respect them. I got the onion peeled back on their business dealings and they are some of the smartest dealmakers I’ve ever seen. Also I hate saying it because I believe gender games are net negative, but I wonder if they’d get so much hate if they weren’t females? I liked the idea of keeping a travel diary like my friend GREG ISENBERG does… Otherwise these moments pass like sand through my fingers. What do you think? I’m going to name it Where Have Ya Been or Lessons from the Road. Which do you like more?

Codie Sanchez

311,356 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🔥【Exclusive】In-Depth Exposure of Wu Xian, the Security Guard Arrested for Assaulting Protesters at the Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles 🔥 🔆 On January 4, Wu Xian ( also known as Wu Boxian 吴泊宪; English name Jack Wu, also written as Jack Woo), who was arrested by police for spraying pepper spray at participants during a Los Angeles rally celebrating the capture of Nicolás Maduro, is 38 years old and originally from Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. 🔆 In addition to owning the JK Patrol SVC in LA, Wu also owns the Los Angeles LA City Cleaning Company, which claims to be “the largest cleaning and environmentally friendly property management company in North America.” He also owns a real estate firm called Masters Realty and holds an insurance agency license. Wu maintains close ties with Chinese-American politicians in the Los Angeles area. 🔆 According to informed sources, Wu Xian’s father made his first fortune in the 1980s by operating long-haul freight transportation businesses in China. He came to the United States in the 2000s and remained under political asylum. He later founded the Los Angeles LA City Cleaning Company, which claims to provide management and maintenance services for residential and commercial buildings throughout Southern California, serving more than 40,000 units. 🔆 In recent years, Wu Xian’s father has gradually handed over management of the company to Wu Xian. 🔆 Wu Xian himself is believed to have come to the United States around 2007, at about 20 years of age. His English is fluent, and he is believed to have received education in the U.S. In addition to obtaining a real estate broker’s license and founding Masters Realty, he also earned an insurance license, demonstrating strong professional capabilities across multiple fields. 🔆 Sources say Wu Xian is socially well connected and generally treats his clients and employees well. He organizes group dinners almost every month, attended not only by employees but also by various members of society, business owners, and government officials, giving him an extensive personal network. 🚔 Additionally, he is described as very shrewd. He purchased a large number of decommissioned police vehiclesand modified them into patrol cars for his security company. Although he does not dare to install police lights, he equips them with yellow construction lights, which, when flashing while driving, can easily cause them to be mistaken for police vehicles. ⭕️ Sources specifically noted that in Chinese-American-concentrated areas of Los Angeles—such as San Gabriel—many Chinese-American politicians have very close relationships with Wu Xian. 😢 One source said he was extremely shocked by the news of Wu Xian committing violent acts in front of the Chinese Consulate, as Wu had always appeared to him to be a cheerful and sunny person, not someone prone to such reckless behavior. It appears that after being hired by the Chinese Consulate, contact with CCP officials corrupted him, leading him to commit acts that are bound to bring severe consequences upon himself and his family—an outcome that is deeply regrettable. Videos 1 and 2 in this post are promotional clips released on TikTok by Wu Xian's JK Patrol SVC Video 3 is an interview clip of Wu Xian published on December 17, 2025, by a Douyin account called “Yanni American Factory Warehouse.” Image 4 shows the business card of Wu (Bo) Xian’s real estate company. (More evidence in the comments)
0:41

🔥【Exclusive】In-Depth Exposure of Wu Xian, the Security Guard Arrested for Assaulting Protesters at the Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles 🔥 🔆 On January 4, Wu Xian ( also known as Wu Boxian 吴泊宪; English name Jack Wu, also written as Jack Woo), who was arrested by police for spraying pepper spray at participants during a Los Angeles rally celebrating the capture of Nicolás Maduro, is 38 years old and originally from Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. 🔆 In addition to owning the JK Patrol SVC in LA, Wu also owns the Los Angeles LA City Cleaning Company, which claims to be “the largest cleaning and environmentally friendly property management company in North America.” He also owns a real estate firm called Masters Realty and holds an insurance agency license. Wu maintains close ties with Chinese-American politicians in the Los Angeles area. 🔆 According to informed sources, Wu Xian’s father made his first fortune in the 1980s by operating long-haul freight transportation businesses in China. He came to the United States in the 2000s and remained under political asylum. He later founded the Los Angeles LA City Cleaning Company, which claims to provide management and maintenance services for residential and commercial buildings throughout Southern California, serving more than 40,000 units. 🔆 In recent years, Wu Xian’s father has gradually handed over management of the company to Wu Xian. 🔆 Wu Xian himself is believed to have come to the United States around 2007, at about 20 years of age. His English is fluent, and he is believed to have received education in the U.S. In addition to obtaining a real estate broker’s license and founding Masters Realty, he also earned an insurance license, demonstrating strong professional capabilities across multiple fields. 🔆 Sources say Wu Xian is socially well connected and generally treats his clients and employees well. He organizes group dinners almost every month, attended not only by employees but also by various members of society, business owners, and government officials, giving him an extensive personal network. 🚔 Additionally, he is described as very shrewd. He purchased a large number of decommissioned police vehiclesand modified them into patrol cars for his security company. Although he does not dare to install police lights, he equips them with yellow construction lights, which, when flashing while driving, can easily cause them to be mistaken for police vehicles. ⭕️ Sources specifically noted that in Chinese-American-concentrated areas of Los Angeles—such as San Gabriel—many Chinese-American politicians have very close relationships with Wu Xian. 😢 One source said he was extremely shocked by the news of Wu Xian committing violent acts in front of the Chinese Consulate, as Wu had always appeared to him to be a cheerful and sunny person, not someone prone to such reckless behavior. It appears that after being hired by the Chinese Consulate, contact with CCP officials corrupted him, leading him to commit acts that are bound to bring severe consequences upon himself and his family—an outcome that is deeply regrettable. Videos 1 and 2 in this post are promotional clips released on TikTok by Wu Xian's JK Patrol SVC Video 3 is an interview clip of Wu Xian published on December 17, 2025, by a Douyin account called “Yanni American Factory Warehouse.” Image 4 shows the business card of Wu (Bo) Xian’s real estate company. (More evidence in the comments)

Inconvenient Truths — Jennifer Zeng Reports

10,700 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

In honor of Y Combinator's 20th anniversary, here are my 6 favorite lessons: 1. The 7 minute espresso rule: Our first meeting with Sam Altman lasted just seven minutes. The batch hadn’t even officially started yet and my cofounder Ryan Rowe and I drove down from Mountain View to the tiny SF YC outpost to meet him. Sam was making an espresso when we walked in. He opened with – “have you launched”? We said no, too many bugs. Our product, kimono, made it easy to just point and click to build a web scraper. Our promise was to get you an API in 60 seconds, without writing a single line of code. But, the web is vast, and websites are very different. We needed it to work on a large enough spectrum of sites so that our first users would have a good experience. It worked on just a handful of sites at the time. Sam pushed us to make sure we were launched in less than 2 weeks. We debated, highlighting the complexity of the bugs and the limits of underlying headless browsing technology. The espresso finished brewing, he picked it up, looked at us and said, “well, you better get going then and fix those bugs”. We left, launched within those next two weeks and learned one of the most important lessons that day - speed matters. Ship something you’re embarrassed by. 2. There are no experts. Ryan and I were not prepared for the rapid influx of user on launch day. We did 88 user interviews to validate our product idea, and everyone basically said they wouldn’t use it. We thought they were wrong and built it anyway. It got tons of traffic on day 1. We didn’t sleep in the 48 hours following because our servers and database kept crashing. We hadn’t indexed it properly. We realized we weren’t the experts and needed to hire one. We went over to Michael Seibel's apartment for advice. Michael smiled and told us about the early days at SocialCam, that eventually became Twitch – experts thought the streaming video problem was too hard to be possible. The answer wasn’t hiring an expert, but hiring someone young, capable and naïve enough to give it an earnest try. So we opted to just figure it out ourselves. 3. Messages in Pizza Boxes. Startups win through incredible customer service, then through product, not the other way around. Michael Seibel told us how SocialCam’s streaming infrastructure went down while a key teammate was unreachable off-grid in a Tahoe cabin for the weekend. Normal people would have waited until Monday. Not Michael. He called a local pizza delivery place and asked the delivery person to send a large pizza with an urgent message in the box to the cabin. Their infrastructure was back up in hours. 4. The Twinkle can matter more than the TAM. Ambition matters just as much as practicality. Before demo day, we were struggling with the end note of our pitch. We knew the value of our product, and had a fanatical and fast-growing user base, but the market size we calculated either seemed so ridiculously big that it was not plausible, or so narrow that it was equally silly. Paul Graham and Geoff Ralston sat with us and showed us that if we can really pull it off at scale, it would be bigger than Google. So, we could skip the market size, if we really believed it. PG suggested not talking about market size, but just making sure people could see the twinkle in our eyes when we talked about what you might be able to do with a structured copy of the internet that’s larger than Google’s. 5. You’re always at the Origin. Our demo day was successful beyond our wildest beliefs. Afterwards, Geoff Ralston drew a chart for us on a whiteboard. It was a hockey stick. He asked us where we thought we were. It was a rhetorical question. He said we were at the origin, and that the most important thing is to remember that. Sam Altman doubled down. When he invested in Kimono, he gave us a Zimbabwean Trillion dollar note (the result of extreme hyperinflation in Zimbabwe), as a cautionary reminder that the fundraising and valuation mean nothing. We have channeled this into our culture at @TheArenaAI with our ritual around neon shoelaces and a pair of neon track spikes hanging on the wall to remind us that we’re at the Olympic starting line, but we don’t have any medals yet. 6. High bandwidth discussions with users don’t happen over email. The Collison brothers, who founded Stripe, took user engagement to the next level – so much so that “Collison installation” is part of YC lore. John Collison told us that talking to users was essential because email and chat conversations were not “high bandwidth” enough. He emphasized the importance of what you can learn being with users in person or talking to them over Skype (remember, this was early 2014!). We took this to heart, and spoke to hundreds of users at Kimono regularly over Skype. One power user Alexander Chung, who I met this way, has become a close friend and even attended my wedding in India. At Arena, we now go a step further and regularly fly to our users. We over-invest to a degree that is almost crazy in order to be more than a supplier — a true partner to our early customers. YC taught us it’s the only way to understand their problems on the ground and really make sure our products work for them. YC taught us to outsource very little. Own the problem. Own the outcome. And if you do, you get to be stupidly ambitious. If you’re curious about Kimono Labs (which we later sold to Palantir ), here was our launch demo. No-code web scraping before “no code” was even a term: Here's our demo day pitch, from 2014. Forever grateful to those above + Garry Tan Jessica Livingston Trevor Blackwell
2:37

In honor of Y Combinator's 20th anniversary, here are my 6 favorite lessons: 1. The 7 minute espresso rule: Our first meeting with Sam Altman lasted just seven minutes. The batch hadn’t even officially started yet and my cofounder Ryan Rowe and I drove down from Mountain View to the tiny SF YC outpost to meet him. Sam was making an espresso when we walked in. He opened with – “have you launched”? We said no, too many bugs. Our product, kimono, made it easy to just point and click to build a web scraper. Our promise was to get you an API in 60 seconds, without writing a single line of code. But, the web is vast, and websites are very different. We needed it to work on a large enough spectrum of sites so that our first users would have a good experience. It worked on just a handful of sites at the time. Sam pushed us to make sure we were launched in less than 2 weeks. We debated, highlighting the complexity of the bugs and the limits of underlying headless browsing technology. The espresso finished brewing, he picked it up, looked at us and said, “well, you better get going then and fix those bugs”. We left, launched within those next two weeks and learned one of the most important lessons that day - speed matters. Ship something you’re embarrassed by. 2. There are no experts. Ryan and I were not prepared for the rapid influx of user on launch day. We did 88 user interviews to validate our product idea, and everyone basically said they wouldn’t use it. We thought they were wrong and built it anyway. It got tons of traffic on day 1. We didn’t sleep in the 48 hours following because our servers and database kept crashing. We hadn’t indexed it properly. We realized we weren’t the experts and needed to hire one. We went over to Michael Seibel's apartment for advice. Michael smiled and told us about the early days at SocialCam, that eventually became Twitch – experts thought the streaming video problem was too hard to be possible. The answer wasn’t hiring an expert, but hiring someone young, capable and naïve enough to give it an earnest try. So we opted to just figure it out ourselves. 3. Messages in Pizza Boxes. Startups win through incredible customer service, then through product, not the other way around. Michael Seibel told us how SocialCam’s streaming infrastructure went down while a key teammate was unreachable off-grid in a Tahoe cabin for the weekend. Normal people would have waited until Monday. Not Michael. He called a local pizza delivery place and asked the delivery person to send a large pizza with an urgent message in the box to the cabin. Their infrastructure was back up in hours. 4. The Twinkle can matter more than the TAM. Ambition matters just as much as practicality. Before demo day, we were struggling with the end note of our pitch. We knew the value of our product, and had a fanatical and fast-growing user base, but the market size we calculated either seemed so ridiculously big that it was not plausible, or so narrow that it was equally silly. Paul Graham and Geoff Ralston sat with us and showed us that if we can really pull it off at scale, it would be bigger than Google. So, we could skip the market size, if we really believed it. PG suggested not talking about market size, but just making sure people could see the twinkle in our eyes when we talked about what you might be able to do with a structured copy of the internet that’s larger than Google’s. 5. You’re always at the Origin. Our demo day was successful beyond our wildest beliefs. Afterwards, Geoff Ralston drew a chart for us on a whiteboard. It was a hockey stick. He asked us where we thought we were. It was a rhetorical question. He said we were at the origin, and that the most important thing is to remember that. Sam Altman doubled down. When he invested in Kimono, he gave us a Zimbabwean Trillion dollar note (the result of extreme hyperinflation in Zimbabwe), as a cautionary reminder that the fundraising and valuation mean nothing. We have channeled this into our culture at @TheArenaAI with our ritual around neon shoelaces and a pair of neon track spikes hanging on the wall to remind us that we’re at the Olympic starting line, but we don’t have any medals yet. 6. High bandwidth discussions with users don’t happen over email. The Collison brothers, who founded Stripe, took user engagement to the next level – so much so that “Collison installation” is part of YC lore. John Collison told us that talking to users was essential because email and chat conversations were not “high bandwidth” enough. He emphasized the importance of what you can learn being with users in person or talking to them over Skype (remember, this was early 2014!). We took this to heart, and spoke to hundreds of users at Kimono regularly over Skype. One power user Alexander Chung, who I met this way, has become a close friend and even attended my wedding in India. At Arena, we now go a step further and regularly fly to our users. We over-invest to a degree that is almost crazy in order to be more than a supplier — a true partner to our early customers. YC taught us it’s the only way to understand their problems on the ground and really make sure our products work for them. YC taught us to outsource very little. Own the problem. Own the outcome. And if you do, you get to be stupidly ambitious. If you’re curious about Kimono Labs (which we later sold to Palantir ), here was our launch demo. No-code web scraping before “no code” was even a term: Here's our demo day pitch, from 2014. Forever grateful to those above + Garry Tan Jessica Livingston Trevor Blackwell

Pratap Ranade

177,308 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

REPLAY FILES BROKEN (FIXED + STEP BY STEP GUIDE) Hey! Currently there's a bug with replay files that prevents replays from before the latest Rocket League patch to load/work. As a creator, this severely impacts my workflow, and waiting for a patch could take a while. So to make sure I, and everyone else out there can continue to work, I've tried to find a solution. Initially I messed around with installing older Rocket League versions through the steam console, and trying to get the Injector from Bakkesmod to downgrade to the matching Rocket League version, however this proved to be tedious and honestly fruitless. So instead I turned to the modding community where I was quickly directed towards Martin, who ended up fixing the replay issue and building a handy tool. WHAT YOU'LL NEED: RocketRP: Microsoft. NET 9.0 Runtime: HOW TO: Step 1: Download (if your antivirus flags it, allow list it. Running unknown files is ALWAYS at your own risk, however I run the setup as well and the sourcecode is available to check for when you're in doubt). Step 2: Download the .NET 9.0 console framework for windows, or your respective platform. Step 3: Install the .NET 9.0 console framework through the downloaded .exe Step 4: Unzip/Extract the "RocketRP .cli .zip" file Step 5: Right click the extracted folder and select "Open in Terminal". If that option doesn't appear you need to click more options, and / or open with, and manually select Powershell or your preferred terminal of choice. Step 6: leave the terminal window open and go to: %USERPROFILE%\Documents\My Games\Rocket League\TAGame\Demos Step 7: Select the replays you want and place these in a new folder somewhere easily accessible. Make sure to back them up just in case* Step 8: Right click the replay you want to fix, and then select "copy as path" Step 9: In notepad or similar, copy this command: .\RocketRP.CLI.exe -r " " -m Repack --backup --legacy-fix true Make sure to replace the " " with the link you copied from the replay in step 8. For a breakdown of the command, check the video or use the help command in the terminal. Step 10: In the terminal, paste the command we created in step 9, then press enter. This should create a backup file of your replay, and it should create a new replay file that has the patch applied. NOTE: Right now, doing full folders isn't working, therefore you'll have to do this 1 replay at a time, untill I post a fix in the comments. Step 11: Put the newly generated replay in the demos folder (step 6) and load back into Rocket League. Your replay should now work as intended! Please note if you get any errors, you mostlikely didn't install the .NET 9.0 console correctly, or you have to check your command for typos. Huge thanks to Martin for helping me out with this, here's his paypal if you want to show him some appreciation: And if you're feeling EXTRA generous, here's my youtube. Consider subscribing if this helped you out!: If you have any questions, leave them below and I'll try to answer them the best I can!
4:44

REPLAY FILES BROKEN (FIXED + STEP BY STEP GUIDE) Hey! Currently there's a bug with replay files that prevents replays from before the latest Rocket League patch to load/work. As a creator, this severely impacts my workflow, and waiting for a patch could take a while. So to make sure I, and everyone else out there can continue to work, I've tried to find a solution. Initially I messed around with installing older Rocket League versions through the steam console, and trying to get the Injector from Bakkesmod to downgrade to the matching Rocket League version, however this proved to be tedious and honestly fruitless. So instead I turned to the modding community where I was quickly directed towards Martin, who ended up fixing the replay issue and building a handy tool. WHAT YOU'LL NEED: RocketRP: Microsoft. NET 9.0 Runtime: HOW TO: Step 1: Download (if your antivirus flags it, allow list it. Running unknown files is ALWAYS at your own risk, however I run the setup as well and the sourcecode is available to check for when you're in doubt). Step 2: Download the .NET 9.0 console framework for windows, or your respective platform. Step 3: Install the .NET 9.0 console framework through the downloaded .exe Step 4: Unzip/Extract the "RocketRP .cli .zip" file Step 5: Right click the extracted folder and select "Open in Terminal". If that option doesn't appear you need to click more options, and / or open with, and manually select Powershell or your preferred terminal of choice. Step 6: leave the terminal window open and go to: %USERPROFILE%\Documents\My Games\Rocket League\TAGame\Demos Step 7: Select the replays you want and place these in a new folder somewhere easily accessible. Make sure to back them up just in case* Step 8: Right click the replay you want to fix, and then select "copy as path" Step 9: In notepad or similar, copy this command: .\RocketRP.CLI.exe -r " " -m Repack --backup --legacy-fix true Make sure to replace the " " with the link you copied from the replay in step 8. For a breakdown of the command, check the video or use the help command in the terminal. Step 10: In the terminal, paste the command we created in step 9, then press enter. This should create a backup file of your replay, and it should create a new replay file that has the patch applied. NOTE: Right now, doing full folders isn't working, therefore you'll have to do this 1 replay at a time, untill I post a fix in the comments. Step 11: Put the newly generated replay in the demos folder (step 6) and load back into Rocket League. Your replay should now work as intended! Please note if you get any errors, you mostlikely didn't install the .NET 9.0 console correctly, or you have to check your command for typos. Huge thanks to Martin for helping me out with this, here's his paypal if you want to show him some appreciation: And if you're feeling EXTRA generous, here's my youtube. Consider subscribing if this helped you out!: If you have any questions, leave them below and I'll try to answer them the best I can!

GGM1 Yota

14,018 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?
0:25

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?

Blaze

29,808 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Charlie Munger reveals why smart people wreck their own decisions without ever noticing it happening: He built a career-long list of the exact mental glitches that trip up geniuses and fools alike, and laid it all out in one Harvard talk. It is one of the most quietly devastating things you will ever watch: 1. Nobody respects incentives enough, not even the people who study them. Munger spent a lifetime near the top of his field and still got surprised. "Well I think I've been in the top 5% of my age cohort all my life in understanding the power of incentives, and all my life I've underestimated it." If the master of the subject keeps underestimating incentives, everyone else is doing it worse. 2. FedEx couldn't fix its night shift until it fixed the paycheque. He loved this story because it proves structure beats persuasion. "The heart and soul of the integrity of the system is that all the packages have to be shifted rapidly in one central location each night. And the system has no integrity if the whole shift can't be done fast." They tried everything except changing how people got paid. Once they paid by the shift instead of the hour, the problem vanished. 3. A skilled surgeon can talk himself into hurting people for money and believe every word of it. This is the darkest lesson in the whole talk. A Nebraska doctor kept removing healthy gallbladders for years before anyone stopped him. Munger asked a colleague if the man knew what he was doing. "Tell me, did he think, here's a way for me to exercise my talents," this guy was very skilled technically, "And make a high living by doing a few maimings and murders every year, along with some frauds?" And he said, "Hell no, Charlie. He thought that the gallbladder was the source of all medical evil, and if you really love your patients, you couldn't get that organ out rapidly enough." Incentives don't just bend behaviour, they bend belief. 4. Even a brilliant mind can turn into a one-trick pony. Munger used B.F. Skinner, one of Harvard's most important scientists, as the cautionary tale. "What gummed up Skinner's reputation is that he developed a case of what I always call man-with-a-hammer syndrome, to the man with a hammer, every problem tends to look pretty much like a nail." Genius doesn't protect you from tunnel vision. It just makes the tunnel vision more convincing. 5. Denial is not weakness, it is a universal human default setting. A mother who lost her son at sea simply refused the fact of it. "This first really hit me between the eyes when a friend of our family had a super-athlete, super-student son who flew off a carrier in the north Atlantic and never came back, and his mother, who was a very sane woman, just never believed that he was dead." As Munger put it plainly elsewhere in the talk, the reality is too painful to bear, so you just distort it until it's bearable. Everyone does this. Founders do it about failing products. Investors do it about failing bets. 6. Taking something away hurts people far more than giving them the same thing helps them. He used his own dog to make the point unforgettable. "I took the Munger dog, lovely harmless dog. The one way, the only way to get that dog to bite you was to try and take something out of its mouth after it was already there." He followed it with a neighbour's blood feud over a three-foot pine tree blocking a sliver of harbour view. "People are really crazy about minor decrements down." Founders who cut a perk or a title learn this the hard way. 7. Boards of directors almost never stop a leader who has gone off the rails. This is the line every investor on X should screenshot. "They only act, again the power of incentives, they only act when it gets so bad that it starts making them look foolish, or threatening legal liability to them. That's Munger's rule." Governance sounds like a safeguard. In practice it is mostly theatre until the risk to the board itself becomes personal. 8. Simply being visible changes behaviour, no persuasion required. He picked the most familiar brand on earth to prove it. "Ask the Coca-Cola company, which has raised availability to a secular religion, if availability changes behavior. You'll drink a hell of a lot more Coke if it's always available." Distribution is not a nice-to-have. It is the lever. 9. A crowd of decent people will watch someone suffer and do nothing, because everyone else is doing nothing. Munger used the murder of Kitty Genovese as his sharpest example of social proof gone wrong. "All these people, I don't know, 50, 60, 70 of them just sort of sat and did nothing while she was slowly murdered. Now one of the explanations is that everybody looked at everybody else and nobody else was doing anything, and so there's automatic social proof that the right thing to do is nothing." Silence in a room is not neutral. It is a signal, and it spreads. 10. The real danger is never one bias alone, it's several firing at once. When asked which single tendency mattered most, he refused to pick just one. "I would say the one thing that causes the most trouble is when you combine a bunch of these together, you get this lollapalooza effect." Individually these glitches are survivable. Stacked together, they produce the biggest disasters in business history. Here's the thing though.... Munger never ran a startup and never chased attention for its own sake, yet he became one of the most quoted people in business because he kept showing up and saying the true thing out loud, year after year, at Berkshire meetings and lecture halls and student Q&As. Buffett built the balance sheet. Munger's voice, carried across decades of speeches like this one, built the reputation that made people trust the balance sheet in the first place. Being public wasn't a side project for him. It was the multiplier that turned one very smart investor into a permanent reference point for how to think. Speaking of which: We build massive distribution and grow personal brands on X and beyond without our clients lifting a finger. If you're a founder or VC looking for that kind of exposure, book a call below. We average 1.5M views a week.
1:16:22

Charlie Munger reveals why smart people wreck their own decisions without ever noticing it happening: He built a career-long list of the exact mental glitches that trip up geniuses and fools alike, and laid it all out in one Harvard talk. It is one of the most quietly devastating things you will ever watch: 1. Nobody respects incentives enough, not even the people who study them. Munger spent a lifetime near the top of his field and still got surprised. "Well I think I've been in the top 5% of my age cohort all my life in understanding the power of incentives, and all my life I've underestimated it." If the master of the subject keeps underestimating incentives, everyone else is doing it worse. 2. FedEx couldn't fix its night shift until it fixed the paycheque. He loved this story because it proves structure beats persuasion. "The heart and soul of the integrity of the system is that all the packages have to be shifted rapidly in one central location each night. And the system has no integrity if the whole shift can't be done fast." They tried everything except changing how people got paid. Once they paid by the shift instead of the hour, the problem vanished. 3. A skilled surgeon can talk himself into hurting people for money and believe every word of it. This is the darkest lesson in the whole talk. A Nebraska doctor kept removing healthy gallbladders for years before anyone stopped him. Munger asked a colleague if the man knew what he was doing. "Tell me, did he think, here's a way for me to exercise my talents," this guy was very skilled technically, "And make a high living by doing a few maimings and murders every year, along with some frauds?" And he said, "Hell no, Charlie. He thought that the gallbladder was the source of all medical evil, and if you really love your patients, you couldn't get that organ out rapidly enough." Incentives don't just bend behaviour, they bend belief. 4. Even a brilliant mind can turn into a one-trick pony. Munger used B.F. Skinner, one of Harvard's most important scientists, as the cautionary tale. "What gummed up Skinner's reputation is that he developed a case of what I always call man-with-a-hammer syndrome, to the man with a hammer, every problem tends to look pretty much like a nail." Genius doesn't protect you from tunnel vision. It just makes the tunnel vision more convincing. 5. Denial is not weakness, it is a universal human default setting. A mother who lost her son at sea simply refused the fact of it. "This first really hit me between the eyes when a friend of our family had a super-athlete, super-student son who flew off a carrier in the north Atlantic and never came back, and his mother, who was a very sane woman, just never believed that he was dead." As Munger put it plainly elsewhere in the talk, the reality is too painful to bear, so you just distort it until it's bearable. Everyone does this. Founders do it about failing products. Investors do it about failing bets. 6. Taking something away hurts people far more than giving them the same thing helps them. He used his own dog to make the point unforgettable. "I took the Munger dog, lovely harmless dog. The one way, the only way to get that dog to bite you was to try and take something out of its mouth after it was already there." He followed it with a neighbour's blood feud over a three-foot pine tree blocking a sliver of harbour view. "People are really crazy about minor decrements down." Founders who cut a perk or a title learn this the hard way. 7. Boards of directors almost never stop a leader who has gone off the rails. This is the line every investor on X should screenshot. "They only act, again the power of incentives, they only act when it gets so bad that it starts making them look foolish, or threatening legal liability to them. That's Munger's rule." Governance sounds like a safeguard. In practice it is mostly theatre until the risk to the board itself becomes personal. 8. Simply being visible changes behaviour, no persuasion required. He picked the most familiar brand on earth to prove it. "Ask the Coca-Cola company, which has raised availability to a secular religion, if availability changes behavior. You'll drink a hell of a lot more Coke if it's always available." Distribution is not a nice-to-have. It is the lever. 9. A crowd of decent people will watch someone suffer and do nothing, because everyone else is doing nothing. Munger used the murder of Kitty Genovese as his sharpest example of social proof gone wrong. "All these people, I don't know, 50, 60, 70 of them just sort of sat and did nothing while she was slowly murdered. Now one of the explanations is that everybody looked at everybody else and nobody else was doing anything, and so there's automatic social proof that the right thing to do is nothing." Silence in a room is not neutral. It is a signal, and it spreads. 10. The real danger is never one bias alone, it's several firing at once. When asked which single tendency mattered most, he refused to pick just one. "I would say the one thing that causes the most trouble is when you combine a bunch of these together, you get this lollapalooza effect." Individually these glitches are survivable. Stacked together, they produce the biggest disasters in business history. Here's the thing though.... Munger never ran a startup and never chased attention for its own sake, yet he became one of the most quoted people in business because he kept showing up and saying the true thing out loud, year after year, at Berkshire meetings and lecture halls and student Q&As. Buffett built the balance sheet. Munger's voice, carried across decades of speeches like this one, built the reputation that made people trust the balance sheet in the first place. Being public wasn't a side project for him. It was the multiplier that turned one very smart investor into a permanent reference point for how to think. Speaking of which: We build massive distribution and grow personal brands on X and beyond without our clients lifting a finger. If you're a founder or VC looking for that kind of exposure, book a call below. We average 1.5M views a week.

Lewis 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

58,157 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce