Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

To construct the base alone, a single small wind turbine requires the burning of 170 tons of coal just to make its steel components, namely the rebar. Then on top of that you have 140 cubic meters of concrete, this is just for the base remember, and of a...

Electroversenet's profile picture

Electroverse

48,940 subscribers

22,759 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von David Denari
David Denarivor 1 Monat

And making concrete from limestone releases *a lot* of C02 into the atmosphere, so the whole operation is a big net negative for the climate change zealots.

Profilbild von Pietje_ik
Pietje_ikvor 1 Monat

fun fact about concrete. to make cement, you need fly ash, that comes from burning coal. An alternative is steel slag, which is a byproduct of steel production. Burning coal for electricity is the cleanest process, for all waste can be used in other processes. Including CO2

Profilbild von Walter Bender
Walter Bendervor 1 Monat

Hier sind einige Zahlen leider etwas ungenau. Es gibt keine Millionen von Windturbinen, die ersetzt werden könnten, da es nach Grok weniger als eine halbe Million Windturbinen mit über 1 MW installierter Leistung gibt. - Grundsätzlich aber richtig, Windkraft benötigt einen irren Materialeinsatz und der Recyclingrad ist tief und lässt sich wahrscheinlich nicht wesentlich erhöhen. Die Fundamente, von denen hier gesprochen wird, mit 140 Kubikmeter Beton, sind sehr viel kleiner als die Fundamente, die in Europa üblicherweise für Windkraftanlagen verbaut werden. Für eine 3 MW-Windkraftanlage für mittlere Windgeschwindigkeiten ist das Gewicht eines durchschnittlichen Fundaments im Bereich von 2000 Tonnen. Das sind somit im Bereich von rund 800 Kubikmeter Stahlbeton.

Profilbild von Neil Ewins 🍊
Neil Ewins 🍊vor 1 Monat

None of it makes any sense in a normal world, but I guess we’re not living in a normal world…!

Profilbild von Trefor Jones
Trefor Jonesvor 1 Monat

Saw this when I was a member of the liaison committee for a large development in South Wales. That area now suffers severe flooding, I wonder why.

Profilbild von Danny lad
Danny ladvor 1 Monat

Yet even after you factor all that stuff in, a kwh of energy produced by wind only emits 11g of co2 compared to 820g for every kwh produced by burning coal..

Profilbild von Sharon Collins
Sharon Collinsvor 1 Monat

Wind turbines take groundwater resources and disturb natural environment including marine life. They are also built along migratory routes and kill birds. They cannot be recycled. WindKraft and the Nazis.

Profilbild von Jimmy
Jimmyvor 1 Monat

Not to m e ntion all the emissions from the transportation and machinery used.Follow the money .All the trillions could have been used to improve present systems or dev e lop better nuclear options,thermal,other better alternatives.

Profilbild von HydraGreens
HydraGreensvor 1 Monat

The material footprint of renewable energy is worth discussing. Steel, concrete, copper and composites don't appear out of nowhere, and their production has an environmental cost. But that doesn't make the comparison complete. The better question is: what is the full lifecycle impact per unit of energy, including manufacturing, operation, replacement, recycling and the emissions avoided over the asset's lifetime? Clean energy shouldn't mean zero impact. It should mean **dramatically lower impact, with the footprint improving as technology and recycling improve.** 🌱 #CleanEnergy #CircularEconomy #RenewableEnergy #ClimateAction

Profilbild von Nitro glycérine 🇫🇷 #Z Macro-incompatible
Nitro glycérine 🇫🇷 #Z Macro-incompatiblevor 1 Monat

Et dire que cette INEPTIE nous est vendu comme le «  net zéro »

Profilbild von GalorAtom
GalorAtomvor 1 Monat

And the Cour des Comptes counted €26.3 billion in renewable subsidies 2016-2024. For infrastructure replaced every 20 years, concrete left permanently in the ground. Nuclear already does the job, better and cheaper.

Profilbild von Used to run like wildfire
Used to run like wildfirevor 1 Monat

talk to me about local bird deaths

Profilbild von Einar Petersen
Einar Petersenvor 1 Monat

can you do the full cradle to grave calculation for the energy consumption for a standard sized oil rig drilling oil in say the Atlantic Ocean up till the time it pulls the first barrel of oil out of the ground and then specify how many barrels it must draw up before it theoretically has evened out it's own energy production cost and operational costs.... include all factors both for construction as well as for initial manning/staffing and supplies needed for the period.

Profilbild von Richard Duke
Richard Dukevor 1 Monat

I remember reading that roughly 10% of energy consumption was from burning rocks to make cement. Not sure if the percentage is correct but making cement for concrete production certainly belongs in your energy calculation.

Profilbild von Deby Ould 〓〓 🇮🇪🇬🇧🩸
Deby Ould 〓〓 🇮🇪🇬🇧🩸vor 1 Monat

And the ones at sea destroy the oceans eco systems!

Profilbild von lechatsorcier
lechatsorciervor 1 Monat

What a complete and total joke. The climate hoax is to bankrupt the West, not stop climate change @KensingtonRoyal, stop shilling leftist BS @RupertLowe10 @RestoreBritain

Profilbild von david johnson
david johnsonvor 1 Monat

This insane policy of centralizing everything is the downfall of humanity.

Profilbild von Vinod Bhardwaj
Vinod Bhardwajvor 1 Monat

You just made up your own facts. The specific numbers and overall framing are not accurate; they mix outdated or selective figures, exaggerate scales, and omit energy payback and lifecycle context.

Profilbild von Hereforthefreedom
Hereforthefreedomvor 1 Monat

The dirtiest delusion ever. People are so sheep like!

Profilbild von Shawn Reese
Shawn Reesevor 1 Monat

Truth

Profilbild von 🇺🇸A New Day w/Mr. Jay🇺🇸
🇺🇸A New Day w/Mr. Jay🇺🇸vor 1 Monat

Massive waste.

Profilbild von Interesting Stuff
Interesting Stuffvor 1 Monat

Oh no! They lied again!

Profilbild von the gangsta granny
the gangsta grannyvor 1 Monat

Think what you are doing New Zealand. This is not the answer.

Profilbild von Peter Nowak
Peter Nowakvor 1 Monat

Yeah turbines need steel and concrete. Coal plants need that too AND burn coal every single day. The comparison is laughable

Profilbild von Smoke&MirrorsGlobal🌍🌡️
Smoke&MirrorsGlobal🌍🌡️vor 1 Monat

“Millions of turbines will need replacing… tearing up land, burning coal, pouring concrete.” You’re describing infrastructure maintenance like it’s a unique sin of renewables. Fossil plants also get rebuilt. Transmission lines get rebuilt. Roads get rebuilt.

Profilbild von Ewin Barnett
Ewin Barnettvor 1 Monat

The site of a wind turbine cannot be fully remediated due to the sheer size of the concrete in the base.

Profilbild von Citizen
Citizenvor 1 Monat

What is disgusting is so many people have said it is the cheapest option for electric production, even Ai trumpets the obvious lies. We have more NG than anyone and should be changing the grid with fuel cell technology and this solves the problem with transformers.

Profilbild von Mike Kelley
Mike Kelleyvor 1 Monat

But "green energy" is a great grift for the rich and connected. I once happened on an article about Berkshire-Hathaway's wind farm deals. Warren's lawyers and accountants arranged it so that selling woke power made Warren Buffett a bundle while ratepayers took all the risk.

Profilbild von Angel
Angelvor 1 Monat

Y no hay garantías de suministro de electricidad.

Profilbild von Kafka Solved!
Kafka Solved!vor 1 Monat

99% of all heat is caused by the sun radiation. At night anyone can feel it .... next day warm again ?

Profilbild von The doorway to sin
The doorway to sinvor 1 Monat

Why couldn't we reuse the concrete?

Profilbild von Fueldog
Fueldogvor 1 Monat

Dummies...

Profilbild von Lowndesy33
Lowndesy33vor 1 Monat

We should put these off the coast of Greenwich so our governor can enjoy his climate policies all year long

Profilbild von Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwellvor 1 Monat

When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientist, but energy budgets are not your strong suit.

Ähnliche Videos

Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity. Up to 15 times more concrete. 90 times more aluminum. And around 50 times more iron, copper and glass. Each 2 MW turbine uses about 1700 tons of material: Around 1300 tons of concrete. Nearly 300 tons of steel. Plus iron, fiberglass and copper. The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concrete. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources, responsible for 8% of global emissions. Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2000 tons of toxic waste. Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process then repeated. Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be.
0:45

Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity. Up to 15 times more concrete. 90 times more aluminum. And around 50 times more iron, copper and glass. Each 2 MW turbine uses about 1700 tons of material: Around 1300 tons of concrete. Nearly 300 tons of steel. Plus iron, fiberglass and copper. The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concrete. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources, responsible for 8% of global emissions. Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2000 tons of toxic waste. Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process then repeated. Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be.

Electroverse

29,569 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity: up to 15x more concrete, 90x more aluminum, and around 50x more iron, copper and glass. Each 2 megawatt turbine uses about 1700 tons of material: around 1300 tons of concrete, nearly 300 tons of steel, plus iron, fiberglass and copper. The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concrete. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources, responsible for 8% of global emissions. Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2000 tons of toxic waste. Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process repeated. Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be.
0:45

Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity: up to 15x more concrete, 90x more aluminum, and around 50x more iron, copper and glass. Each 2 megawatt turbine uses about 1700 tons of material: around 1300 tons of concrete, nearly 300 tons of steel, plus iron, fiberglass and copper. The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concrete. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources, responsible for 8% of global emissions. Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2000 tons of toxic waste. Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process repeated. Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be.

Electroverse

13,964 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

🚨 Wind is Not the Clean Energy it is Sold to be. Wind #energy has been sold to an unsuspecting public as a clean, renewable source of unending energy. But that isn't true. In fact, the building of an average wind industrial installation consumes vastly more CO2 producing raw materials per kwh than any other power source in use today. Ever wonder what really goes into building a wind turbine, its tower, and its foundation? This brief video does a great job of giving you the details, and they are neither pretty nor clean. Text: Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity, up to 15 times more concrete, 90 times more aluminum, and around 50 times more iron, copper, and glass. Each two megawatt turbine uses about 1,700 tons of material, around 1,300 tons of concrete, nearly 300 tons of steel, plus iron, fiberglass, and copper. The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concretes. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources responsible for 8% of global emissions. Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2,000 tons of toxic waste. Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process repeated. Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be. #windenergy #toxicwaste #rareearthminerals #steel #concrete #CO2 #falsenarrative
0:45

🚨 Wind is Not the Clean Energy it is Sold to be. Wind #energy has been sold to an unsuspecting public as a clean, renewable source of unending energy. But that isn't true. In fact, the building of an average wind industrial installation consumes vastly more CO2 producing raw materials per kwh than any other power source in use today. Ever wonder what really goes into building a wind turbine, its tower, and its foundation? This brief video does a great job of giving you the details, and they are neither pretty nor clean. Text: Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity, up to 15 times more concrete, 90 times more aluminum, and around 50 times more iron, copper, and glass. Each two megawatt turbine uses about 1,700 tons of material, around 1,300 tons of concrete, nearly 300 tons of steel, plus iron, fiberglass, and copper. The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concretes. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources responsible for 8% of global emissions. Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2,000 tons of toxic waste. Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process repeated. Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be. #windenergy #toxicwaste #rareearthminerals #steel #concrete #CO2 #falsenarrative

⚡️David Blackmon⚡️

12,547 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

One gigawatt of wind capacity requires about 2,900 tons of copper. At a standard ore grade of 0.6%, 99.4% of the ore is not copper. Producing those 2,900 tons therefore requires processing roughly 480,000 tons of ore. That is about 1,200 full loads in a 400-ton-class mining truck. And it excludes the waste rock, overburden and processing losses. Count those and the total material moved can exceed 1 to 2 million tons. And that's before adding the steel, concrete, fiberglass and other materials required by the wind project. The "green" turbine does not begin with the wind. It begins with a mountain being blasted, hauled and crushed.
0:43

One gigawatt of wind capacity requires about 2,900 tons of copper. At a standard ore grade of 0.6%, 99.4% of the ore is not copper. Producing those 2,900 tons therefore requires processing roughly 480,000 tons of ore. That is about 1,200 full loads in a 400-ton-class mining truck. And it excludes the waste rock, overburden and processing losses. Count those and the total material moved can exceed 1 to 2 million tons. And that's before adding the steel, concrete, fiberglass and other materials required by the wind project. The "green" turbine does not begin with the wind. It begins with a mountain being blasted, hauled and crushed.

Electroverse

31,185 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It would take 3.7 trillion pounds of materials to generate half of U.S. electricity with 1,095,000 2 MW wind turbines. Each turbine requires 1,671 tons of material: 1,300 tons concrete, 295 tons steel, 48 tons iron, 24 tons fiberglass, 4 tons copper, 0.4 tons neodymium, and 0.065 tons dysprosium, replaced every 15-20 years. Mining and ore processing, is the second most polluting industry in the world, releasing acid rain and heavy metals into land, water, and air. Extracting and processing dispersed minerals consumes significant fossil fuel energy. Billions more tons of materials are needed for transmission, power plants, and utility-scale batteries, also replaced every 15-20 years. The green energy dream remains just that—a dream.
0:20

It would take 3.7 trillion pounds of materials to generate half of U.S. electricity with 1,095,000 2 MW wind turbines. Each turbine requires 1,671 tons of material: 1,300 tons concrete, 295 tons steel, 48 tons iron, 24 tons fiberglass, 4 tons copper, 0.4 tons neodymium, and 0.065 tons dysprosium, replaced every 15-20 years. Mining and ore processing, is the second most polluting industry in the world, releasing acid rain and heavy metals into land, water, and air. Extracting and processing dispersed minerals consumes significant fossil fuel energy. Billions more tons of materials are needed for transmission, power plants, and utility-scale batteries, also replaced every 15-20 years. The green energy dream remains just that—a dream.

John Lee Pettimore

91,384 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The talk around Net Zero ignores many inconvenient facts, but top of the list is probably the mining requirements to get us there. For the world to reach Net Zero by 2050--that is, to build the solar panels and wind turbines required--we'd need to mine over 4.5 billion tons of copper, 940 million tons of nickel, 9 billion tons of graphite and 4 million tons of germanium. At today's mining rates that would take more than a thousand years. Net Zero is nigh on impossible to achieve. And even attempting to do so will ravage vast areas of the planet.
0:32

The talk around Net Zero ignores many inconvenient facts, but top of the list is probably the mining requirements to get us there. For the world to reach Net Zero by 2050--that is, to build the solar panels and wind turbines required--we'd need to mine over 4.5 billion tons of copper, 940 million tons of nickel, 9 billion tons of graphite and 4 million tons of germanium. At today's mining rates that would take more than a thousand years. Net Zero is nigh on impossible to achieve. And even attempting to do so will ravage vast areas of the planet.

Electroverse

39,084 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Trillions of dollars are being poured into wind and solar. But these technologies are far from green. Each turbine requires hundreds of tons of steel, concrete, and rare earths. Each solar panel relies on energy-intensive mining and toxic chemical processing. Scaling this up to replace fossil fuels would mean billions of tons of new mining, scarred landscapes, and enormous fossil energy inputs just to manufacture the equipment. At the current pace, even with the trillions invested, the world wouldn't hit 100% renewables until the year 2392. In reality, the 'renewable revolution' is astronomically expensive, painfully slow, and environmentally destructive.
0:57

Trillions of dollars are being poured into wind and solar. But these technologies are far from green. Each turbine requires hundreds of tons of steel, concrete, and rare earths. Each solar panel relies on energy-intensive mining and toxic chemical processing. Scaling this up to replace fossil fuels would mean billions of tons of new mining, scarred landscapes, and enormous fossil energy inputs just to manufacture the equipment. At the current pace, even with the trillions invested, the world wouldn't hit 100% renewables until the year 2392. In reality, the 'renewable revolution' is astronomically expensive, painfully slow, and environmentally destructive.

Electroverse

33,161 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

WIND TURBINES - The truth isn’t clean or green. This was once to be a beautiful lake, now it’s just hundreds of km of toxic sludge … after mining rare earth Neodymium. A 2 MW wind turbine is made up of: ▪️260 tons of steel requiring ▪️300 tons of iron ore ▪️170 tons of coking coal ▪️ rare earths including Praseodymium (Pr), Neodymium (Nd), Terbium (Tb), and Dysprosium (Dy) ▪️fibre glass ▪️resin ▪️plastic ▪️aluminium …. all mined & produced using hydrocarbons. And all leaving a trail of destruction as they are mined, extracted and manufactured. So we can pretend we’ve saved the planet 🤡
0:23

WIND TURBINES - The truth isn’t clean or green. This was once to be a beautiful lake, now it’s just hundreds of km of toxic sludge … after mining rare earth Neodymium. A 2 MW wind turbine is made up of: ▪️260 tons of steel requiring ▪️300 tons of iron ore ▪️170 tons of coking coal ▪️ rare earths including Praseodymium (Pr), Neodymium (Nd), Terbium (Tb), and Dysprosium (Dy) ▪️fibre glass ▪️resin ▪️plastic ▪️aluminium …. all mined & produced using hydrocarbons. And all leaving a trail of destruction as they are mined, extracted and manufactured. So we can pretend we’ve saved the planet 🤡

Bernie

143,355 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

An estimated 40 million tons of wind turbine blades will end up in landfills by 2050. Each modern blade weighs around 10 to 15 tons--mostly fiberglass and epoxy composites with 1 to 2 tons of carbon fiber, balsa and foam, plus roughly a ton of steel and copper for structural support and lightning protection. All mined, smelted and transported using fossil fuels. Then once they wear out, after just 15 years, those complex materials are almost impossible to recycle, so most are simply buried. It's another hidden cost of green energy and the complete opposite of sustainable.
0:34

An estimated 40 million tons of wind turbine blades will end up in landfills by 2050. Each modern blade weighs around 10 to 15 tons--mostly fiberglass and epoxy composites with 1 to 2 tons of carbon fiber, balsa and foam, plus roughly a ton of steel and copper for structural support and lightning protection. All mined, smelted and transported using fossil fuels. Then once they wear out, after just 15 years, those complex materials are almost impossible to recycle, so most are simply buried. It's another hidden cost of green energy and the complete opposite of sustainable.

Electroverse

850,219 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Wind and solar are sold as clean and sustainable, but eventually the hardware becomes waste. The US currently has 76,000 wind turbines and 650 million solar panels installed. The turbine blades alone represent 5.5 million tons of eventual waste. Existing US solar panels represent another 18 million tons. Unlike conventional power plants that can operate for 50 to 80 years or more, wind turbines and solar panels require replacement after 15 to 20 years (shorter by some studies). By 2050, cumulative global waste is projected to reach 200 million tons of wind turbine blades and 78 million tons of solar panels. Turbine blades are nigh on impossible to recycle. Solar panels are technically easier, but recovering many embedded materials is often expensive and uneconomic. Much of it ultimately faces the same destination: landfill. Wind and solar are labelled renewable, but there's nothing renewable about them.
0:52

Wind and solar are sold as clean and sustainable, but eventually the hardware becomes waste. The US currently has 76,000 wind turbines and 650 million solar panels installed. The turbine blades alone represent 5.5 million tons of eventual waste. Existing US solar panels represent another 18 million tons. Unlike conventional power plants that can operate for 50 to 80 years or more, wind turbines and solar panels require replacement after 15 to 20 years (shorter by some studies). By 2050, cumulative global waste is projected to reach 200 million tons of wind turbine blades and 78 million tons of solar panels. Turbine blades are nigh on impossible to recycle. Solar panels are technically easier, but recovering many embedded materials is often expensive and uneconomic. Much of it ultimately faces the same destination: landfill. Wind and solar are labelled renewable, but there's nothing renewable about them.

Electroverse

14,100 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Reformed ex-climate alarmist, Tom Harris: “Wind turbines require a backup fossil fuel plant that continues burning 90% of the time, making the wind turbine largely unnecessary and, in essence, just for show”. This is a far cry from the environmentally friendly image presented.
1:14

Reformed ex-climate alarmist, Tom Harris: “Wind turbines require a backup fossil fuel plant that continues burning 90% of the time, making the wind turbine largely unnecessary and, in essence, just for show”. This is a far cry from the environmentally friendly image presented.

Andrew Bridgen

201,080 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“Work has been suspended at a major wind farm project south west of Warwick after storms snapped a wind turbine blade. McIntrye Wind Farm recently connected some of its turbines to the grid, those works are on hold as it investigates the incident.” “The 458MW Coopers Gap wind farm in south west Queensland, the newest and biggest wind project built to date in Australia – is to undergo major repairs after faults were found in its commissioning process. AGL, which operates the $850 million project and is a joint owner through the Powering Australia Renewables Fund, said in a statement that the blades of one of the 123 turbines will have to be replaced entirely, while GE Catcon is also going to replace “generators” – referring to the equipment in the nacelle at the top of the wind tower – in a further 50 turbines.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Not only are wind farms unreliable in terms of wind dependent generation. They break easily as we saw last week on the Darling Downs. If the blades on a wind farm can’t survive a summer storm on the Darling Downs they will be useless. This is just another example of wind farms being unreliable. A few years ago wind farm had to replace 50 out of 123 turbines just after it was commissioned. Australia cannot not afford to be pursuing Net Zero policies being pushed by the two major parties. We should focus on using our coal, uranium and gas resources instead of imported materials. Quote from: #auspol
1:06

“Work has been suspended at a major wind farm project south west of Warwick after storms snapped a wind turbine blade. McIntrye Wind Farm recently connected some of its turbines to the grid, those works are on hold as it investigates the incident.” “The 458MW Coopers Gap wind farm in south west Queensland, the newest and biggest wind project built to date in Australia – is to undergo major repairs after faults were found in its commissioning process. AGL, which operates the $850 million project and is a joint owner through the Powering Australia Renewables Fund, said in a statement that the blades of one of the 123 turbines will have to be replaced entirely, while GE Catcon is also going to replace “generators” – referring to the equipment in the nacelle at the top of the wind tower – in a further 50 turbines.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Not only are wind farms unreliable in terms of wind dependent generation. They break easily as we saw last week on the Darling Downs. If the blades on a wind farm can’t survive a summer storm on the Darling Downs they will be useless. This is just another example of wind farms being unreliable. A few years ago wind farm had to replace 50 out of 123 turbines just after it was commissioned. Australia cannot not afford to be pursuing Net Zero policies being pushed by the two major parties. We should focus on using our coal, uranium and gas resources instead of imported materials. Quote from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

35,158 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Reformed ex-climate alarmist, Tom Harris: Wind turbines "require a backup fossil fuel plant that continues burning 90% of the time, making the wind turbine largely unnecessary and, in essence, just for show." "This is a far cry from the environmentally friendly image that is presented to the public." Credit: International Climate Science Coalition
1:15

Reformed ex-climate alarmist, Tom Harris: Wind turbines "require a backup fossil fuel plant that continues burning 90% of the time, making the wind turbine largely unnecessary and, in essence, just for show." "This is a far cry from the environmentally friendly image that is presented to the public." Credit: International Climate Science Coalition

Wide Awake Media

376,790 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Australian government whistleblower blows the lid off the renewable energy scam. "[Wind turbines need] coal fired power in order to turn... So there's absolutely nothing about them that works, apart from reaming [$600,000 - $900,000, per turbine] out of the Australian economy, and it's going offshore." This coming winter, remember: Your energy bills have skyrocketed in order to subsidise wind turbines that don't even work, as part of the Net Zero agenda to deindustrialise (and thereby impoverish) the West. Full interview: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
3:43

Australian government whistleblower blows the lid off the renewable energy scam. "[Wind turbines need] coal fired power in order to turn... So there's absolutely nothing about them that works, apart from reaming [$600,000 - $900,000, per turbine] out of the Australian economy, and it's going offshore." This coming winter, remember: Your energy bills have skyrocketed in order to subsidise wind turbines that don't even work, as part of the Net Zero agenda to deindustrialise (and thereby impoverish) the West. Full interview: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

302,562 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

By 2050, the world is forecast to face 43 million tons of decommissioned wind turbine blades. These blades are built from high-strength composites made to survive years of weathering. Still, every single turbine standing today will age-out before 2050. Most are difficult to recycle, so most are likely to be buried. But Europe now has a landfill ban for blades coming into force. Nations like Germany, Finland and the Netherlands are already blocking landfills, but they still have blades to dispose of, so the waste is pushed elsewhere. Blades are exported to countries where burial is still allowed, such as the UK. Net Zero creates a mountain of composite waste, and then has the audacity to call itself "green."
0:47

By 2050, the world is forecast to face 43 million tons of decommissioned wind turbine blades. These blades are built from high-strength composites made to survive years of weathering. Still, every single turbine standing today will age-out before 2050. Most are difficult to recycle, so most are likely to be buried. But Europe now has a landfill ban for blades coming into force. Nations like Germany, Finland and the Netherlands are already blocking landfills, but they still have blades to dispose of, so the waste is pushed elsewhere. Blades are exported to countries where burial is still allowed, such as the UK. Net Zero creates a mountain of composite waste, and then has the audacity to call itself "green."

Electroverse

37,732 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

A person who services a wind turbine or a “Wind Technician,” makes 20K a month. Once a month, he climbs to the top of each turbine and takes care of the sensors on top. It takes a half an hour on a small elevator to get to the top. Each technician wears harnesses for protection. The money involved in these turbines is insane.
1:06

A person who services a wind turbine or a “Wind Technician,” makes 20K a month. Once a month, he climbs to the top of each turbine and takes care of the sensors on top. It takes a half an hour on a small elevator to get to the top. Each technician wears harnesses for protection. The money involved in these turbines is insane.

Doreen Linder

828,768 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

By 2050, the world is forecast to face 43 million tons of decommissioned wind turbine blades. These blades are built from high-strength composites made to survive years of weathering. Still, every single turbine standing today will age out before 2050. Most are difficult to recycle, so most are likely to be buried. But Europe now has a landfill ban for blades coming into force. Nations like Germany, Finland and the Netherlands are already blocking landfills. But they still have blades to dispose of. So the waste is pushed elsewhere. Blades are exported to countries where burial is still allowed, such as the UK. Net zero creates a mountain of composite waste. And then has the audacity to call it green.
0:47

By 2050, the world is forecast to face 43 million tons of decommissioned wind turbine blades. These blades are built from high-strength composites made to survive years of weathering. Still, every single turbine standing today will age out before 2050. Most are difficult to recycle, so most are likely to be buried. But Europe now has a landfill ban for blades coming into force. Nations like Germany, Finland and the Netherlands are already blocking landfills. But they still have blades to dispose of. So the waste is pushed elsewhere. Blades are exported to countries where burial is still allowed, such as the UK. Net zero creates a mountain of composite waste. And then has the audacity to call it green.

Electroverse

104,707 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten