正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

To: Mike Pence From: Ivan Raiklin Subject: Why did you violate: A. The Electoral Count Act and Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 on December 23, 2020? B. The 12th Amendment (when you and Nancy Pelosi disallowed the required Quorum for the Joint Session on January 6, 2021? In...

IvanRaiklin's profile picture

Ivan Raiklin

257,857 subscribers

52,293 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Kathy DiCesare 的头像
Kathy DiCesare3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Keep on exposing @Mike_Pence he isn’t for the American people…

Carolyn Calfo 的头像
Carolyn Calfo3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Ivan. Well done.

Z 的头像
Z3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Pence was always part of the Uniparty.

Rhonda White 的头像
Rhonda White3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Could all of the above be the motivation for continually indicting the President?😵‍💫

Ivan Raiklin 的头像
Ivan Raiklin3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi 100% it's to protect Pence, the uniparty's favorite. He was effective at being Trump's handler during the first term, so now he gets his opportunity to ruin the nation.

CNileBiden 的头像
CNileBiden3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Here here. AZ has all the evidence needed.

Lynn Niemeyer 的头像
Lynn Niemeyer3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Thank You for exposing corruption . . . 🙏 2 Chronicles 7:14 🇺🇸

realRDoc 的头像
realRDoc3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Pence did not respond the the Parliamentary inquiry and instead falsely labeled the representatives inquiry as debate. It is a valid point of order under Robert’s Rules and in fact a valid Point of Parliamentary Procedure which has to be responded to before procedure continues.

Korey 🇺🇸 💯 的头像
Korey 🇺🇸 💯2 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi Can Pence spell T-R-E-A-S-O-N?

TakeitbackUSA 的头像
TakeitbackUSA3 年前

@Mike_Pence @SpeakerPelosi

相关视频

To: Kevin McCarthy Bryan Steil Congresswoman Laurel Lee CC: Morgan Griffith Rep. Barry Loudermilk January 6, 2021 Joint Session lacked the 12th Amendment Quorum and thus was an illegal certification. House: "a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice" In other words, 34 House members each from a different state minimum. Senate: "a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice." In other words 67 Senators. Kevin McCarthy must hold a new joint session with a quorum immediately and present all of the evidence of an illegally certified election by AZ, WI, PA, MI, GA, NV, NH. I would be honored to provide him and his staff everything needed to move forward with this.
1:21

To: Kevin McCarthy Bryan Steil Congresswoman Laurel Lee CC: Morgan Griffith Rep. Barry Loudermilk January 6, 2021 Joint Session lacked the 12th Amendment Quorum and thus was an illegal certification. House: "a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice" In other words, 34 House members each from a different state minimum. Senate: "a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice." In other words 67 Senators. Kevin McCarthy must hold a new joint session with a quorum immediately and present all of the evidence of an illegally certified election by AZ, WI, PA, MI, GA, NV, NH. I would be honored to provide him and his staff everything needed to move forward with this.

Ivan Raiklin

546,854 次观看 • 3 年前

𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐆𝐇 𝐈𝐒 𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐆𝐇! 𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐆𝐇 𝐎𝐅 𝐇𝐄𝐑 𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐒! Sara Duterte's repeated non-appearance before Congress shows grave insult and disrespect to this institution. If she cannot respect us—the Members of the House of Representatives—at least respect the House of Representatives as an institution, at least respect the Constitution. The whole budget process is something that is being directed and recognized by the Constitution itself. So disrespecting the budgetary process of this Body is a clear case of disrespect of our Constitution. Who is she to continuously disrespect or show disrespect to this Body as an institution and to the Constitution. If she can afford to be showing herself up to the Senate, including being there, and applauding the former Senate President in his privilege speech, which is definitely not part of her mandate as a Vice President, why can't she not spare a few moments of her time attending to her official function as Vice President to defend the budget of her office. Enough is enough! Enough of her brattiness! So, I rise today to manifest my extreme displeasure about the behavior of VP Sara, and in due time, I will move for the decrease in the budget of the Office of the Vice President. I actually intended initially to move for zero budget or for the disapproval of the budget of the Office of the Vice President in light of those very questionable actuations of the part of the Vice President. But after some mulling, after some reflections, and out of courtesy also and consideration to the personnel and staff of the Office of the Vice President, I’m just now thinking of moving for the decrease, let’s say, for the retention of the MOOE and personnel services budget and get rid of the operational budget of the Office of the Vice President. I will move for that, at the proper time, during the period of amendment. And I hope that my colleagues will join me in that amendment. Wag niyang bastusin ang ating Konstitusyon!
1:18

𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐆𝐇 𝐈𝐒 𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐆𝐇! 𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐆𝐇 𝐎𝐅 𝐇𝐄𝐑 𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐒! Sara Duterte's repeated non-appearance before Congress shows grave insult and disrespect to this institution. If she cannot respect us—the Members of the House of Representatives—at least respect the House of Representatives as an institution, at least respect the Constitution. The whole budget process is something that is being directed and recognized by the Constitution itself. So disrespecting the budgetary process of this Body is a clear case of disrespect of our Constitution. Who is she to continuously disrespect or show disrespect to this Body as an institution and to the Constitution. If she can afford to be showing herself up to the Senate, including being there, and applauding the former Senate President in his privilege speech, which is definitely not part of her mandate as a Vice President, why can't she not spare a few moments of her time attending to her official function as Vice President to defend the budget of her office. Enough is enough! Enough of her brattiness! So, I rise today to manifest my extreme displeasure about the behavior of VP Sara, and in due time, I will move for the decrease in the budget of the Office of the Vice President. I actually intended initially to move for zero budget or for the disapproval of the budget of the Office of the Vice President in light of those very questionable actuations of the part of the Vice President. But after some mulling, after some reflections, and out of courtesy also and consideration to the personnel and staff of the Office of the Vice President, I’m just now thinking of moving for the decrease, let’s say, for the retention of the MOOE and personnel services budget and get rid of the operational budget of the Office of the Vice President. I will move for that, at the proper time, during the period of amendment. And I hope that my colleagues will join me in that amendment. Wag niyang bastusin ang ating Konstitusyon!

Leila de Lima

135,098 次观看 • 10 个月前

#Freedom250 Signers of the Declaration of Independence: Richard Henry Lee (1732-1794) Richard Henry Lee, born on January 20, 1732, at Stratford Hall in Virginia, played an indispensable role for American independence. Over a long public life, he served in the Virginia House of Burgesses, as president of the Continental Congress, a U.S. Senator from Virginia, and as one of the first to hold the title of president pro tempore of the Senate.
1:17

#Freedom250 Signers of the Declaration of Independence: Richard Henry Lee (1732-1794) Richard Henry Lee, born on January 20, 1732, at Stratford Hall in Virginia, played an indispensable role for American independence. Over a long public life, he served in the Virginia House of Burgesses, as president of the Continental Congress, a U.S. Senator from Virginia, and as one of the first to hold the title of president pro tempore of the Senate.

美国驻华使领馆 U.S. Mission to China

22,448 次观看 • 2 个月前

What’s going on with Trump right now is exactly what the 25th Amendment is for. Watch this report closely with that in mind. Path is simple: The VP and a majority of the Cabinet invoke the 25th Amendment, declare the president unable to discharge the duties of the office, which is plainly obvious, and transfer power immediately. No hearings. No waiting for the next election. Now. If they won’t act after this, they’re not believers, they’re complicit. That’s an abdication of duty to the Constitution and to the country.
1:48

What’s going on with Trump right now is exactly what the 25th Amendment is for. Watch this report closely with that in mind. Path is simple: The VP and a majority of the Cabinet invoke the 25th Amendment, declare the president unable to discharge the duties of the office, which is plainly obvious, and transfer power immediately. No hearings. No waiting for the next election. Now. If they won’t act after this, they’re not believers, they’re complicit. That’s an abdication of duty to the Constitution and to the country.

Christopher Webb

115,479 次观看 • 4 个月前

Do not let the false narrative of Alan Peter Cayetano confuse the public. Here's the transcript of the explanation of the Acting Senate President Serwin Gatchalian: "The Chair would like to state for the record that we are compelled to call the session to order today. After the Senate adjourned on May 26, 2026, session was scheduled to resume on Monday. June 1, 2026, and on Tuesday, June 2, 2026. But the former Senate president failed to appear in both instances. Further, Article 6, Section 16.5 of the Constitution provides that neither House... Şhall during sessions of Congress adjourned for more than three days without the consent of the other house. The Senate. has The Senate has been adjourned and unable to resume session for the past two days, placing us on the brink of constitutional violation had we not convened today. Thus, in the absence of a duly consulted postponement, and the continued absence of the former Senate President. Former Senate President Potempre and members of the majority. We are compelled to call the session to order. The Quorum of Twelve is based on majority of 22 senators over whom jurisdiction can be obtained by the Senate. This is in full accord with the ruling of the court in Avellino v. Cuenco. that an absolute majority of 12 out of the 23 members can constitute a constitutional majority of the Senate for quorum purposes. And with Precedent... Specifically, the May 5, 2015 session where the quorum was based on 17 available senators with seven others beyond the Senate's coercive jurisdiction. Thank you." End
1:51

Do not let the false narrative of Alan Peter Cayetano confuse the public. Here's the transcript of the explanation of the Acting Senate President Serwin Gatchalian: "The Chair would like to state for the record that we are compelled to call the session to order today. After the Senate adjourned on May 26, 2026, session was scheduled to resume on Monday. June 1, 2026, and on Tuesday, June 2, 2026. But the former Senate president failed to appear in both instances. Further, Article 6, Section 16.5 of the Constitution provides that neither House... Şhall during sessions of Congress adjourned for more than three days without the consent of the other house. The Senate. has The Senate has been adjourned and unable to resume session for the past two days, placing us on the brink of constitutional violation had we not convened today. Thus, in the absence of a duly consulted postponement, and the continued absence of the former Senate President. Former Senate President Potempre and members of the majority. We are compelled to call the session to order. The Quorum of Twelve is based on majority of 22 senators over whom jurisdiction can be obtained by the Senate. This is in full accord with the ruling of the court in Avellino v. Cuenco. that an absolute majority of 12 out of the 23 members can constitute a constitutional majority of the Senate for quorum purposes. And with Precedent... Specifically, the May 5, 2015 session where the quorum was based on 17 available senators with seven others beyond the Senate's coercive jurisdiction. Thank you." End

Just

64,540 次观看 • 2 个月前

"It's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified." Rep Jamie Raskin Well, Raskin needs to refresh on the law. The 14th Amendment Section 3 doesn’t apply to the President (Trump). If you read Section 3 of the 14th Amendment nowhere does it mention that one cannot be President. ▫️Legal Interpretation: The presidency is not considered an “officer of the United States” under the amendment. Officers are appointed, the President is appointed elected. Therefore the 14th Amendment wouldn’t apply to the President as they’re not an Officer of the United States. ▫️Debate Topic: Whether January 6th qualifies as an “insurrection” and whether Trump’s actions meet the amendment’s requirements. ▫️Supreme Court Ruling: This section of the amendment does not apply to the presidency. This interpretation upholds Trump’s eligibility for office, ensuring his eventual ascension to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. 🔗🔗with more information in comments 👇🏻
0:49

"It's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified." Rep Jamie Raskin Well, Raskin needs to refresh on the law. The 14th Amendment Section 3 doesn’t apply to the President (Trump). If you read Section 3 of the 14th Amendment nowhere does it mention that one cannot be President. ▫️Legal Interpretation: The presidency is not considered an “officer of the United States” under the amendment. Officers are appointed, the President is appointed elected. Therefore the 14th Amendment wouldn’t apply to the President as they’re not an Officer of the United States. ▫️Debate Topic: Whether January 6th qualifies as an “insurrection” and whether Trump’s actions meet the amendment’s requirements. ▫️Supreme Court Ruling: This section of the amendment does not apply to the presidency. This interpretation upholds Trump’s eligibility for office, ensuring his eventual ascension to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. 🔗🔗with more information in comments 👇🏻

❥❥❥ᗰoᒪᒪie❥❥❥

66,537 次观看 • 1 年前

📌Closing all Doors for Chiwenga, LynneM 💕💝💎 and Cde Knox M Chivero could be right 🔸During the debate on the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 3) Bill (CAB3), the Minister of Justice, Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi, explained that Clause 4 deletes Section 94(3) of the Constitution. That subsection used to require a Vice‑President who takes over as President after a vacancy to be sworn in with a new presidential oath. 🔸He pointed out that this requirement is no longer needed because Amendment No. 2 of 2021 already changed the rules: when the presidency becomes vacant, Parliament now elects a new President within 30 days. So the old oath requirement for a Vice‑President stepping up no longer applies. 🔸He stressed that removing this outdated provision simply brings the Constitution into line with the current law. Parliament has since passed the amendment. -—————————————————— ⭕️Key quotations from the Constitution and the amendment 1. The provision being repealed – Section 94(3) of the Constitution (still in force until Clause 4 of CAB3 takes effect): “A Vice‑President who becomes President on the death, resignation or removal from office of the President assumes office when he or she takes, before the Chief Justice or the next most senior judge available, the oath of President in the form set out in the Third Schedule, which oath he or she must take as soon as possible and in any event within forty‑eight hours after the office of President became vacant.” 2. The change made by Amendment No. 2 of 2021 – that Act removed the old system of elected Vice‑Presidents and introduced the current rules (including the 30‑day parliamentary election process for a new President). The amendment is cited as: “Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 2) Act, 2021” (The specific provisions that established the new vacancy‑filling procedure are found in the amendments to sections 92, 94 and 95 of the Constitution.) 3. Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi’s explanation (as summarised from his statement in Parliament): “Clause 4 repeals Section 94(3), which had required a Vice‑President assuming the Presidency after a vacancy to take the oath of office. This provision became redundant after Amendment No. 2 of 2021, which established that Parliament elects a new President within 30 days of a vacancy. The repeal ensures the Constitution reflects current law.” ——————————————————- 📌🃏In short: The old oath rule for a Vice‑President who becomes President is being scrapped because it’s been overtaken by the 2021 change that gives Parliament the power to elect a new President within 30 days. Clause 4 of CAB3 clears away that obsolete requirement.
1:15

📌Closing all Doors for Chiwenga, LynneM 💕💝💎 and Cde Knox M Chivero could be right 🔸During the debate on the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 3) Bill (CAB3), the Minister of Justice, Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi, explained that Clause 4 deletes Section 94(3) of the Constitution. That subsection used to require a Vice‑President who takes over as President after a vacancy to be sworn in with a new presidential oath. 🔸He pointed out that this requirement is no longer needed because Amendment No. 2 of 2021 already changed the rules: when the presidency becomes vacant, Parliament now elects a new President within 30 days. So the old oath requirement for a Vice‑President stepping up no longer applies. 🔸He stressed that removing this outdated provision simply brings the Constitution into line with the current law. Parliament has since passed the amendment. -—————————————————— ⭕️Key quotations from the Constitution and the amendment 1. The provision being repealed – Section 94(3) of the Constitution (still in force until Clause 4 of CAB3 takes effect): “A Vice‑President who becomes President on the death, resignation or removal from office of the President assumes office when he or she takes, before the Chief Justice or the next most senior judge available, the oath of President in the form set out in the Third Schedule, which oath he or she must take as soon as possible and in any event within forty‑eight hours after the office of President became vacant.” 2. The change made by Amendment No. 2 of 2021 – that Act removed the old system of elected Vice‑Presidents and introduced the current rules (including the 30‑day parliamentary election process for a new President). The amendment is cited as: “Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 2) Act, 2021” (The specific provisions that established the new vacancy‑filling procedure are found in the amendments to sections 92, 94 and 95 of the Constitution.) 3. Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi’s explanation (as summarised from his statement in Parliament): “Clause 4 repeals Section 94(3), which had required a Vice‑President assuming the Presidency after a vacancy to take the oath of office. This provision became redundant after Amendment No. 2 of 2021, which established that Parliament elects a new President within 30 days of a vacancy. The repeal ensures the Constitution reflects current law.” ——————————————————- 📌🃏In short: The old oath rule for a Vice‑President who becomes President is being scrapped because it’s been overtaken by the 2021 change that gives Parliament the power to elect a new President within 30 days. Clause 4 of CAB3 clears away that obsolete requirement.

Chimbwa

101,625 次观看 • 1 个月前

The House defers the budget plenary deliberation of the Office of the Vice President The absence of the Vice President in the house plenary budget deliberation only means that she doesn’t care enough to defend the programs and projects of her office. If she claims that all these are necessary, she will do whatever it takes to fight for it. The House of Representatives adjourned the budget deliberation around three in the morning, that’s around 17 hours of debate and interpellations. But heads of government agencies patiently wait, members of the majority and minority fulfill their duty in the arguably most important piece of legislation the congress needs to pass every year. I agree with what Congressman Paolo Ortega said, that the photos of the Vice President are indeed concerning, it is not just disrespectful to the House of Representatives and the office she represents… This is also considered as a neglect of her duty as the head of her office. “If these reports are accurate, it is deeply concerning that the Vice President chose leisure over fulfilling her official constitutional duties to the nation. The budget deliberation is a critical process, one that ensures transparency and accountability in the use of public funds” The office of the Vice President released a statement but not even that justifies her absence in the house plenary deliberation. Talking to the people is important but it is not urgent and definitely not official — she can always go back and talk to them on days that are not her scheduled budget hearing. Based on an interview of Cong. Zia Alonto Adiong, his office repeatedly reached out to her office but in the end “walang meeting with OVP”. Please note that ALL government agencies brief the sponsor of their budget in preparation for the budget plenary hearing. Watch here: As per what's decided in plenary is that they will defer the budget deliberation and rescheduled to today, although I am not expecting that the Vice President will show up at this point. The level of her manners is beyond what I can understand, borrowing the internet word for it “bratinella” Just for the record, the Vice President, her allies and her supporters cannot play victim if she’s given a much lower budget than what was approved in committee. And I will use whatever limited platform I have to call upon the Senator to see the budget proposal of the Vice President by the merits and content, not her popularity.
4:36

The House defers the budget plenary deliberation of the Office of the Vice President The absence of the Vice President in the house plenary budget deliberation only means that she doesn’t care enough to defend the programs and projects of her office. If she claims that all these are necessary, she will do whatever it takes to fight for it. The House of Representatives adjourned the budget deliberation around three in the morning, that’s around 17 hours of debate and interpellations. But heads of government agencies patiently wait, members of the majority and minority fulfill their duty in the arguably most important piece of legislation the congress needs to pass every year. I agree with what Congressman Paolo Ortega said, that the photos of the Vice President are indeed concerning, it is not just disrespectful to the House of Representatives and the office she represents… This is also considered as a neglect of her duty as the head of her office. “If these reports are accurate, it is deeply concerning that the Vice President chose leisure over fulfilling her official constitutional duties to the nation. The budget deliberation is a critical process, one that ensures transparency and accountability in the use of public funds” The office of the Vice President released a statement but not even that justifies her absence in the house plenary deliberation. Talking to the people is important but it is not urgent and definitely not official — she can always go back and talk to them on days that are not her scheduled budget hearing. Based on an interview of Cong. Zia Alonto Adiong, his office repeatedly reached out to her office but in the end “walang meeting with OVP”. Please note that ALL government agencies brief the sponsor of their budget in preparation for the budget plenary hearing. Watch here: As per what's decided in plenary is that they will defer the budget deliberation and rescheduled to today, although I am not expecting that the Vice President will show up at this point. The level of her manners is beyond what I can understand, borrowing the internet word for it “bratinella” Just for the record, the Vice President, her allies and her supporters cannot play victim if she’s given a much lower budget than what was approved in committee. And I will use whatever limited platform I have to call upon the Senator to see the budget proposal of the Vice President by the merits and content, not her popularity.

Just

28,512 次观看 • 1 年前

Stephen A. Smith has two words for MTG and other “bloviators” pushing the 25th Amendment on President Trump: “STOP IT!” “That ain’t going to happen.” “As long as he’s alive and breathing…. Trump’s going to be the president until the end of the year 2028. It’s just a fact.” “The 25th Amendment will not be executed.” “Stop it. All you’re showing is how useless you are.” “To invoke the 25th Amendment, you’re going to have to get the Vice President to sign off, the Republicans in the House to sign off, Cabinet members to sign off, basically declaring him unfit.” “And as a result, it’s a reason why it’s never been exercised in American history.” “Stop it!”
1:30

Stephen A. Smith has two words for MTG and other “bloviators” pushing the 25th Amendment on President Trump: “STOP IT!” “That ain’t going to happen.” “As long as he’s alive and breathing…. Trump’s going to be the president until the end of the year 2028. It’s just a fact.” “The 25th Amendment will not be executed.” “Stop it. All you’re showing is how useless you are.” “To invoke the 25th Amendment, you’re going to have to get the Vice President to sign off, the Republicans in the House to sign off, Cabinet members to sign off, basically declaring him unfit.” “And as a result, it’s a reason why it’s never been exercised in American history.” “Stop it!”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

318,915 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rep. Nancy Mace just proposed a constitutional amendment requiring Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural-born U.S. citizens — the same standard already required for President and Vice President. Mace posted: “We just introduced a long overdue joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to require Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural born citizens. This is the very same standard the President and Vice President are already required to meet.” She points to Reps. Ilhan Omar (born in Somalia), Pramila Jayapal (born in India), and Shri Thanedar (born in India) as examples of divided loyalties. Passing a constitutional amendment requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states — a very high bar. Should only natural-born Americans write our laws and judge our cases? (Video: AI)
0:20

Rep. Nancy Mace just proposed a constitutional amendment requiring Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural-born U.S. citizens — the same standard already required for President and Vice President. Mace posted: “We just introduced a long overdue joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to require Members of Congress, federal judges, and Senate-confirmed officers to be natural born citizens. This is the very same standard the President and Vice President are already required to meet.” She points to Reps. Ilhan Omar (born in Somalia), Pramila Jayapal (born in India), and Shri Thanedar (born in India) as examples of divided loyalties. Passing a constitutional amendment requires 2/3 of Congress + 3/4 of states — a very high bar. Should only natural-born Americans write our laws and judge our cases? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

321,322 次观看 • 2 个月前

On 28th December 1995, the President Jerry John Rawlings got into a ‘fight’ with his Vice President during a Cabinet meeting. The VEEP walks out of the meeting and goes straight to the IGP to report the President for assault. A month later, in January 1996, the man decides to run for 1996 Elections as President on the ticket of the NCP party whiles still in office….WILD?? 5yrs later, whiles on a drive to his house, a car rams into his car and flees the scene causing his death… Spare 8mins and watch/listen to the story of this man…and possibly our ‘HARDEST’ VICE PRESIDENT EVER TikTok - YouTUBE -
0:30

On 28th December 1995, the President Jerry John Rawlings got into a ‘fight’ with his Vice President during a Cabinet meeting. The VEEP walks out of the meeting and goes straight to the IGP to report the President for assault. A month later, in January 1996, the man decides to run for 1996 Elections as President on the ticket of the NCP party whiles still in office….WILD?? 5yrs later, whiles on a drive to his house, a car rams into his car and flees the scene causing his death… Spare 8mins and watch/listen to the story of this man…and possibly our ‘HARDEST’ VICE PRESIDENT EVER TikTok - YouTUBE -

CHIEF

50,351 次观看 • 6 个月前

When a motion for the removal of the Speaker is taken up, Article 96 makes it very clear that the Speaker cannot sit in the Chair. The actions of the Speaker also cannot be admitted at that point of time. You (Jagdambika Pal) have been appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. You are sitting there as a member of the panel of chairpersons appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Article 93 states: “The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof and, so often as the office of the Speaker or Deputy Speaker becomes vacant, the House shall choose another member to be Speaker or Deputy Speaker, as the case may be.” Immediately after the election, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker are supposed to be elected. For the last seven years, you have not elected a Deputy Speaker. You have created a constitutional vacuum. This question is very clear. Article 96 is very clear. 👉The House has to select a person to sit in the Chair. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) K C Venugopal ji in Lok Sabha
1:30

When a motion for the removal of the Speaker is taken up, Article 96 makes it very clear that the Speaker cannot sit in the Chair. The actions of the Speaker also cannot be admitted at that point of time. You (Jagdambika Pal) have been appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. You are sitting there as a member of the panel of chairpersons appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Article 93 states: “The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof and, so often as the office of the Speaker or Deputy Speaker becomes vacant, the House shall choose another member to be Speaker or Deputy Speaker, as the case may be.” Immediately after the election, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker are supposed to be elected. For the last seven years, you have not elected a Deputy Speaker. You have created a constitutional vacuum. This question is very clear. Article 96 is very clear. 👉The House has to select a person to sit in the Chair. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) K C Venugopal ji in Lok Sabha

Congress

112,713 次观看 • 5 个月前

And here it is, The January 6 Committee preparing for PRISON, TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEWS HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, The treasonous witch Nancy Pelosi instigated a criminal conspiracy to frame the President of the United States Donald J. Trump and Jan 6 Committee covered it up. A: The MISSING Ornato, Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview conducted (by Mr. Liz Cheney himself) on January 28, 2022. He testified Mark Meadows pushed D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser for Trump’s call for 10,000 National Guard as she needed to protect the city from the FBI, but the bitch refused. TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEW HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, B: The missing Chairwoman, Joint Chief of Staff, MARK MILLEY (January 3,2021) “The President just says, ‘Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.’” “President Trump ‘Hey, I don’t care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it’s safe.’” And here are the charges every single member of the Jan 6 committee are preparing for, Perjury. Destruction of evidence. Tampering with Evidence. Tampering with witnesses. Obstruction of Justice. And conspiracy to defraud the United States government.
1:58

And here it is, The January 6 Committee preparing for PRISON, TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEWS HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, The treasonous witch Nancy Pelosi instigated a criminal conspiracy to frame the President of the United States Donald J. Trump and Jan 6 Committee covered it up. A: The MISSING Ornato, Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview conducted (by Mr. Liz Cheney himself) on January 28, 2022. He testified Mark Meadows pushed D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser for Trump’s call for 10,000 National Guard as she needed to protect the city from the FBI, but the bitch refused. TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEW HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, B: The missing Chairwoman, Joint Chief of Staff, MARK MILLEY (January 3,2021) “The President just says, ‘Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.’” “President Trump ‘Hey, I don’t care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it’s safe.’” And here are the charges every single member of the Jan 6 committee are preparing for, Perjury. Destruction of evidence. Tampering with Evidence. Tampering with witnesses. Obstruction of Justice. And conspiracy to defraud the United States government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

793,244 次观看 • 1 年前

Is the truth too incriminating that the Vice President cannot simply answer questions? Entitlement and arrogance. I do not have high regards for the Vice President but her behavior and attitude during the congressional budget is on a different level. To say that she is disrespectful is an understatement. Rightfully so, Congressman Jay Khonghun moved to defer the budget of the Vice President for refusing to answer questions and disrespecting the committee. I agree with him when he said that we are a republic, we do not have a queen or king — the Vice President cannot do what she wants without checks and balances. I have been watching budget deliberations all my adult life. Both houses of the legislative always ask about the expenditures of the previous years in comparison with their proposed budget for the upcoming year. It is a common practice. Asking that question will give the congress the confidence to grant what is proposed. I want to highlight the interpellations of the Rep. Rodge Gutierrez, he explained in length why asking questions regarding the confidential funds is within the bounds of the discussion. Ironically, it was Congressman Ungab who told him that, the same representation who was in defense of the Vice President earlier today. Rep. Guiterrez also asked the Vice President regarding the COA findings including the lack of documentary evidence as a reason for the disallowance. Please watch the video in full length. I commend the House of Representatives for standing its ground for the disrespect and inappropriate behavior of the Vice President. Shukran!
13:37

Is the truth too incriminating that the Vice President cannot simply answer questions? Entitlement and arrogance. I do not have high regards for the Vice President but her behavior and attitude during the congressional budget is on a different level. To say that she is disrespectful is an understatement. Rightfully so, Congressman Jay Khonghun moved to defer the budget of the Vice President for refusing to answer questions and disrespecting the committee. I agree with him when he said that we are a republic, we do not have a queen or king — the Vice President cannot do what she wants without checks and balances. I have been watching budget deliberations all my adult life. Both houses of the legislative always ask about the expenditures of the previous years in comparison with their proposed budget for the upcoming year. It is a common practice. Asking that question will give the congress the confidence to grant what is proposed. I want to highlight the interpellations of the Rep. Rodge Gutierrez, he explained in length why asking questions regarding the confidential funds is within the bounds of the discussion. Ironically, it was Congressman Ungab who told him that, the same representation who was in defense of the Vice President earlier today. Rep. Guiterrez also asked the Vice President regarding the COA findings including the lack of documentary evidence as a reason for the disallowance. Please watch the video in full length. I commend the House of Representatives for standing its ground for the disrespect and inappropriate behavior of the Vice President. Shukran!

Just

583,333 次观看 • 1 年前

At this moment 3 years ago, I was presiding with then-Vice President Pence over the Joint Session of Congress to certify the 2020 election and the peaceful transfer of power to President Biden and Vice President Harris when a violent mob—enflamed by the former president—stormed the Capitol. More than 2,000 rioters made it inside the building. Some in the massive crowd chanted “hang Mike Pence” while others swarmed outside my office chanting “Nancy, Nancy, Nancy,” even screaming about wanting to put a bullet in my head. Sadly, 140 police officers were injured by rioters. Many sustained long-lasting physical and emotional scars. Some officers later lost their lives. I feared for my members, the congressional staff, the workers who maintain the Capitol, the press, and the others who were present that day. Their stories are harrowing—and demonstrate extraordinary courage. When the Capitol was eventually cleared, the Congress returned to certify the electoral count for the American people and the world alike to see. January 6 was a perilous moment for our democracy. It was an attack not just on the Capitol, but on our Constitution. And some who carried out the assault under Lincoln’s dome were carrying the Confederate flag. But on that dark night, Congress again projected America’s strength and resolve. 3 years later, it is essential that #DemocratsDefendDemocracy with courage and commitment to ensure that next January 6th will be a peaceful and proud day for the American people. -NP
2:15

At this moment 3 years ago, I was presiding with then-Vice President Pence over the Joint Session of Congress to certify the 2020 election and the peaceful transfer of power to President Biden and Vice President Harris when a violent mob—enflamed by the former president—stormed the Capitol. More than 2,000 rioters made it inside the building. Some in the massive crowd chanted “hang Mike Pence” while others swarmed outside my office chanting “Nancy, Nancy, Nancy,” even screaming about wanting to put a bullet in my head. Sadly, 140 police officers were injured by rioters. Many sustained long-lasting physical and emotional scars. Some officers later lost their lives. I feared for my members, the congressional staff, the workers who maintain the Capitol, the press, and the others who were present that day. Their stories are harrowing—and demonstrate extraordinary courage. When the Capitol was eventually cleared, the Congress returned to certify the electoral count for the American people and the world alike to see. January 6 was a perilous moment for our democracy. It was an attack not just on the Capitol, but on our Constitution. And some who carried out the assault under Lincoln’s dome were carrying the Confederate flag. But on that dark night, Congress again projected America’s strength and resolve. 3 years later, it is essential that #DemocratsDefendDemocracy with courage and commitment to ensure that next January 6th will be a peaceful and proud day for the American people. -NP

Nancy Pelosi

404,462 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨BREAKING: President Trump just announced two different Executive Orders that will allow DC to be SAFE AGAIN! "A short while ago in the Oval Office, president Trump signed two crucial executive actions to deal with the emergency crime conditions we currently face in the District Of Columbia. The first of these was an executive order as president Trump said before, uh, invoking his powers under section 40 of the Home Rule Act to take federal control of the DC Metropolitan Police Department. Along with that executive order, president Trump signed the statutorily required notification letters to mayor Bowser and to the relevant house and senate committee leaders." "The second major executive action that president Trump signed was a presidential memorandum directing the secretary of defense to utilize the national guard to address the conditions we see on on our our streets here in DC. It also authorized the secretary of defense to work with state governors to utilize their national guard, uh, units if necessary as well. These are bold, decisive steps intended to combat the out of control crime conditions we've seen on DC streets for far too long, and I, for one, am deeply proud to be part of an administration that's finally coming to terms with these issues, sir."
1:24

🚨BREAKING: President Trump just announced two different Executive Orders that will allow DC to be SAFE AGAIN! "A short while ago in the Oval Office, president Trump signed two crucial executive actions to deal with the emergency crime conditions we currently face in the District Of Columbia. The first of these was an executive order as president Trump said before, uh, invoking his powers under section 40 of the Home Rule Act to take federal control of the DC Metropolitan Police Department. Along with that executive order, president Trump signed the statutorily required notification letters to mayor Bowser and to the relevant house and senate committee leaders." "The second major executive action that president Trump signed was a presidential memorandum directing the secretary of defense to utilize the national guard to address the conditions we see on on our our streets here in DC. It also authorized the secretary of defense to work with state governors to utilize their national guard, uh, units if necessary as well. These are bold, decisive steps intended to combat the out of control crime conditions we've seen on DC streets for far too long, and I, for one, am deeply proud to be part of an administration that's finally coming to terms with these issues, sir."

Gunther Eagleman™

42,360 次观看 • 1 年前

Here it is: Pedostein Files CONFIRM: Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Bannon laid out a scheme to overthrow the sitting president of the United States Donald J. Trump through the 25th Amendment and install Mike Pompeo as president. And Judas Pence and Nancy Pelosi were in on it. Pedostein: “I like the idea of Pence stepping down in favor of Pompeo so that when it happens, he becomes president.” Steve Bannon: “Has that idea been shopped?” Pedostein: “Rudy did lay out impeachment. Pelosi… vote. And don’t go after Ivanka.” Steve Bannon: “Great.”
3:22

Here it is: Pedostein Files CONFIRM: Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Bannon laid out a scheme to overthrow the sitting president of the United States Donald J. Trump through the 25th Amendment and install Mike Pompeo as president. And Judas Pence and Nancy Pelosi were in on it. Pedostein: “I like the idea of Pence stepping down in favor of Pompeo so that when it happens, he becomes president.” Steve Bannon: “Has that idea been shopped?” Pedostein: “Rudy did lay out impeachment. Pelosi… vote. And don’t go after Ivanka.” Steve Bannon: “Great.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

324,094 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is: The Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6. Not only did he call the treacherous witch, Nancy Pelosi once; he called her twice — and then a third time. Watch as the entire room erupts when Capitol Police Chief Chief Steven Sund exposes Nancy Pelosi’s treacherous lies during shocking January 6 testimony: “I spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times, and she went on TV and said I had never spoken to her.” 📝It’s time to investigate the bitch once and for all. The January 6 riot was orchestrated as a distraction to prevent the presentation of evidence of election fraud — an act that amounted to the overthrow of the U.S. government.
4:50

This is: The Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6. Not only did he call the treacherous witch, Nancy Pelosi once; he called her twice — and then a third time. Watch as the entire room erupts when Capitol Police Chief Chief Steven Sund exposes Nancy Pelosi’s treacherous lies during shocking January 6 testimony: “I spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times, and she went on TV and said I had never spoken to her.” 📝It’s time to investigate the bitch once and for all. The January 6 riot was orchestrated as a distraction to prevent the presentation of evidence of election fraud — an act that amounted to the overthrow of the U.S. government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

391,534 次观看 • 9 个月前