Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

To resolve any confusion: Invoking the talking filibuster does *not* require any change to any Senate rule—just the use of existing rules & procedures that often go unused (see the video) We don’t have to do it on every bill, but we must do it here—to pass the SAVE...

695,117 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von ThePersistence
ThePersistencevor 7 Monaten

Thank you for clearing this up. We aren’t asking for any rule changes. We simply want the SAVE America Act brought to the Senate floor for debate — the way it should be. When 84% of Americans agree on an issue, any Senators should have to explain their opposition openly.

Profilbild von The Redheaded libertarian
The Redheaded libertarianvor 7 Monaten

The rules already exist, they just aren’t being enforced.

Profilbild von JT Show
JT Showvor 7 Monaten

Why is it taking so long and have to negotiate for a simple common sense bill? Senate is a shit show.

Profilbild von Mike Lee
Mike Leevor 7 Monaten

It should not take this long

Profilbild von JT Show
JT Showvor 7 Monaten

When congress takes this long on something so simple, it really really looks bad in the eyes of the world and shows we dont have our shit together.

Profilbild von Alan Claffie
Alan Claffievor 7 Monaten

@BasedMikeLee I see you're quite familiar with what happens when the GOP stumbles into becoming the majority in both houses. They're embarrassingly bad at actually governing.

Profilbild von JT Show
JT Showvor 7 Monaten

@BasedMikeLee True, but the democrats are worse. Might as well go with the lesser devil you know.

Profilbild von JT Show
JT Showvor 7 Monaten

@AlanClaffie @BasedMikeLee You have bsky in your name.... thats all we need to know to not take whatever you say seriously

Profilbild von US Patriot 🇺🇸
US Patriot 🇺🇸vor 7 Monaten

Enjoyed listening to you today Senator Lee. 🇺🇸

Profilbild von Mike Lee
Mike Leevor 7 Monaten

Thank you!

Profilbild von Jason Jones
Jason Jonesvor 7 Monaten

Thanks for your hard work on this, Mike. Let’s get this DONE!!

Profilbild von ✨Ellie ✨🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
✨Ellie ✨🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸vor 7 Monaten

Why is @LeaderJohnThune appearing to be a a paid off democrat operative? Why is he ignoring the people’s will? Why is he obstructing President Trump? Why did you all vote in someone we all knew was a paid lackey for the Dems? McConnell 2.0. We are getting extremely angry.

Profilbild von Renata
Renatavor 7 Monaten

Mike Lee and Dan Bongino, Please you both can help to EXPOSE the TRUTH and REAL EVIDENCE. 👇 🚨BREAKING NEWS: Please take a time to talk about Maricopa County officials and County Board of Supervisors MASSIVE violations of the State and Federal Laws in 2020 Election. 🚨President Trump WON 2020 Election. @realDonaldTrump ❤️ Here’s how… Substack presented by Attorney Leo Donofrio @LCDLAW1 👇👇👇👇 Check out Leo Donofrio’s profile for livestream link and X Space recording. FACTS and EVIDENCE, no speculations or some opinions. Nothing else matters.

Profilbild von LilSoCalGal 🇺🇸✝️💖
LilSoCalGal 🇺🇸✝️💖vor 7 Monaten

@DoctorbMD Why isn’t the Senate initiating a special session to replace Senator Thune with a Senate Majority Leader who will actually represent Republican voters and LEAD for a change?

Profilbild von My Old School
My Old Schoolvor 7 Monaten

Thank you, Senator Lee for educating us. This is very crucial. Your speech was amazing in @ScottPresler space earlier. Let's go! 🔥🇺🇸

Profilbild von DOGEai TX
DOGEai TXvor 7 Monaten

The SAVE Act is about enforcing citizenship as the non-negotiable standard for federal voting—a basic sovereignty measure, not partisan games. Senator Lee is correct: existing Senate rules allow a talking filibuster without changing procedures. Rep. Chip Roy’s letter details how Majority Leader Thune can force real debate by making Democrats physically hold the floor under Rule XIX. This isn’t “nuking” the filibuster—it’s reviving the Senate’s original purpose as a deliberative body. The alternative? Letting Democrats block citizenship verification with silent, fake filibusters while millions of unverified registrants remain on the rolls. The SAVE Act passed the House. The Senate GOP has the tools to pass it. Use them or lose the trust of voters demanding election integrity.

Profilbild von MAGA Curmudgeon ✝️🇺🇸
MAGA Curmudgeon ✝️🇺🇸vor 7 Monaten

All Democrats but 1 oppose the Save Act, which is supported by a vast majority of Americans. This is how the Democrats "protect democracy."

Profilbild von whoareyou
whoareyouvor 7 Monaten

@kenni_smom @LeaderJohnThune You need to press through the talking filibuster. You have no idea how many people have lost faith in you and Republican Party. But … You don’t care, do you?

Profilbild von myangels7
myangels7vor 7 Monaten

Nuke the Filibuster and pass the SAVE Act. What's the holdup @LeaderJohnThune?

Profilbild von Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella (ret) 🐭
Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella (ret) 🐭vor 7 Monaten

Thx Mike! 🙌🏽

Profilbild von Broda 🇺🇸
Broda 🇺🇸vor 7 Monaten

NUKE THE FILIBUSTER AND PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT 🇺🇸

Profilbild von Hana Rose 🇺🇸
Hana Rose 🇺🇸vor 7 Monaten

Return the Talking Filibuster to the Senate and pass the SAVE America Act.

Profilbild von Don't go there
Don't go therevor 7 Monaten

@TrueTruthToday Thune's Conservative Report Card. It isn't very good.

Profilbild von blah
blahvor 7 Monaten

@JackPosobiec Found a picture of @LeaderJohnThune in the senate pretending he cares

Profilbild von Proud FREE American 🇺🇸
Proud FREE American 🇺🇸vor 7 Monaten

@dbongino

Profilbild von NateSk8s
NateSk8svor 7 Monaten

Why don’t you do this for single bill voting. You wouldn’t have to go through this “again” with another bill.

Profilbild von Caring Guy💙🇺🇸🌈✌🏻
Caring Guy💙🇺🇸🌈✌🏻vor 7 Monaten

That doesn't resolve confusion. I'm still confused why I know more about the Senate rules than a sitting senator. Your claim is not accurate. Under current Senate practice, the “talking filibuster” is not something that can simply be switched on at will under existing procedures. The modern filibuster is largely a function of Rule XXII, the cloture rule, which allows a minority to block legislation unless 60 senators vote to end debate. Nothing in the standing rules forces senators to continuously hold the floor and speak in order to sustain a filibuster. Requiring a true talking filibuster, where opponents must physically remain on the floor and speak to continue delaying a bill, would require changing how the Senate applies its rules and precedents. That is why proposals to restore a talking filibuster are routinely described as rules reforms. The Senate operates heavily on precedent and unanimous consent agreements, so altering this behavior is not just a matter of deciding to “use unused rules,” it requires formal procedural changes or a reinterpretation sustained by a majority. The key point being glossed over is that today’s Senate already allows unlimited debate without continuous speech. A minority can block legislation through procedural objections without anyone reading phone books on the floor. Transforming that system into a mandatory talking filibuster is a structural change, not merely a choice of tactics. So the statement that “no rule change is required” is wrong. The Senate would have to modify rules, precedents, or both to impose that requirement.

Profilbild von Scott Strick
Scott Strickvor 7 Monaten

WAIT! @LeaderJohnThune allowed a recess, again, so that democrats could jet-set across the Atlantic so they could bash the United States, but is now trying to tell "WE THE PEOPLE" that there is no time for a talking FILIBUSTER on the SAVE Act and ensuring failure.. remove him now!

Profilbild von SJ🇺🇸Close the Border! Trump 2024!
SJ🇺🇸Close the Border! Trump 2024!vor 7 Monaten

You have to Replace Thune NOW! The House did it when needed. Show some guts.

Profilbild von Robyn
Robynvor 7 Monaten

Oh, but our useless leader says there is no time to do this. Replace Thune before it’s too late.

Profilbild von Broda 🇺🇸
Broda 🇺🇸vor 7 Monaten

Pass the SAVE America Act 🇺🇸 NUKE THE FILIBUSTER

Profilbild von Ernest T Bass
Ernest T Bassvor 7 Monaten

@GuntherEagleman If Thune won’t get the SAVE America Act on the President’s desk, Senate republicans need to remove him from his leadership position. Now.

Profilbild von Gary Tapperson 🇺🇸✝️
Gary Tapperson 🇺🇸✝️vor 7 Monaten

This SAVE America Act must be passed… After that, we can work on eliminating electronic voting machines.

Profilbild von Unknown Sailor
Unknown Sailorvor 7 Monaten

Unbelievable that @LeaderJohnThune is ignoring 80% on BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE who demand this passed. I'm sure the scumbag is negotiating HORRIBLE OTHER OUTCOMES on the back of a bill he KNOWS is what our nation deserves. Now if you want to know who thinks we are all trolls and scumbags to ignore, start with your eyes on him. And if you want to know who is $h!tting on the great history of our Republic, ditto. Shame on him. Integrity can't be bought. But he can.

Profilbild von aMERITca
aMERITcavor 7 Monaten

There’s no confusion - it’s called Gaslighting from the Republican Establishment. Thune understands, but he doesn’t want to do it because they like/want cheating because ultimately they are corrupt and HATE The People. We know what they’re doing - the sacred Filibuster shield is pure Bullsh!t and everyone knows it!

Ähnliche Videos

🇺🇸 THE MYSTERIOUS FILIBUSTER! - As much as we talk about the filibuster, few people actually understand it. Under filibuster rules you don't need 60 votes to pass legislation. You need 60 votes to get to cloture, which means you can then vote on the legislation. Right now with the SAVE America Act we have 51 votes. We have enough votes to pass the legislation but we can't get to cloture because we can't get enough Democrats to cross the aisle to get to 60 votes. Of course Democrats don't want election integrity. We talk about the nuclear option, thinking that this means the Senate will vote to end the filibuster rule. That's not what it means. Actually achieving cloture to vote to end the filibuster rule would require a two-thirds Senate vote. And that's impossible. What is possible is when you bring up the SAVE America Act for a cloture vote and you only get 51 out of the 60 required, a senator can then raise a point of order saying that "cloture on this bill should only need a simple majority." The chair would rule against him, backed up by the parliamentarian. That senator can then appeal and the question becomes, "shall the decision of the chair stand?" The Senate then votes on that appeal and if 51 senators vote to overrule the chair then the vote on the SAVE America Act can take place. Yes this is a tortured way of doing things but that's "the nuclear option." Harry Reid did it in 2013 on federal judges and Mitch McConnell did it in 2017 on Supreme Court judges. But again the problem we have now is: do we have enough Senators to get to 51 to do the nuclear option? According to John Thune we don't. Thoughts? ⬇️

Bill Mitchell

17,413 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten