Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Today Govt extended offshore processing of asylum seekers for 10yrs. They talk about the biz model of people smugglers, but there’s also a biz model of offshore processing. Compare the $420m we’re paying over 3yrs to imprison 65 people on Nauru w $4k pa to house in Aust. #auspol

🌏 Zali Steggall MP

50,325 subscribers

38,041 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

🌏 Zali Steggall MP3 years ago

The Govt gave parliament less than 24hrs notice and then restricted debate. I asked the Minister to be true to ALP’s election promise to process asylum seekers within 90 days & give an undertaking to that effect. Time for a royal commission into offshore detention.

Prof Kathy Eagar AM @keagar.bsky.social3 years ago

Disgraceful decision by Labor. I’m so disappointed. So much for values-based leadership. @AlboMP @JEChalmers @ClareONeilMP @refugeenurses @Refugees @sandy_eagar

Old Soldier3 years ago

Consider the $80 billion we paid in just one year after the ALPs last border disaster. Consider the 17 detention centres we had filled to the brim.

Paul Begley3 years ago

Labor continuing to run scared from attacks by NewsCorp flunkies, so we keep paying $$$$millions to LNP donor companies to keep Nauru and Manus going.

Calliope never vote LNP3 years ago

Soooo disappointed in ALP behaving just like the Libs. Only difference is the projected establishment of Fed ICAC. How is that going, by the way? No progress on TPVs, David McBride, witness K, or Julian Assange. So much for human rights! Don't get me started on coal.

Richard Edinger3 years ago

$4k per year?

posiedon19713 years ago

You can house a refugee in Australia for $76 a week? How? Where? At your place? #Australia #auspol

Bond 🇦🇺3 years ago

I have an even better money saving idea, send them all back & we the tax payer wont have to pay for them anymore. The money ca be put to good use & re-open clean coal fired power stations & get this nation moving again!

CreakingGum 🍉🐨🌳3 years ago

Yes a business model for supporting American corporations that lock people up.

john3 years ago

@JaquelineOutram Should have dump it put money to heath and welfare looking money waste buy LMP BRING THEM HOME 💖💰💰💰💰

Related Videos

I’ve been calling for a Royal Commission into the offshore processing scandals involving the awarding of contracts and asked the PM about it in Question Time. There’s no Royal Commission, but there was a very sudden announcement of an Inquiry. Let’s call that a win for integrity.

I’ve been calling for a Royal Commission into the offshore processing scandals involving the awarding of contracts and asked the PM about it in Question Time. There’s no Royal Commission, but there was a very sudden announcement of an Inquiry. Let’s call that a win for integrity.

Zoe Daniel (she/her)

30,547 views • 3 years ago

PM Albanese tears into Peter Dutton for having the nerve to question govt’s spending & gives the Opposition leader “some examples” of spending under his LNP govt, inc. “$423mill for an offshore processing contract awarded to a firm registered to a shack on Kangaroo Island…”🔥QT

PM Albanese tears into Peter Dutton for having the nerve to question govt’s spending & gives the Opposition leader “some examples” of spending under his LNP govt, inc. “$423mill for an offshore processing contract awarded to a firm registered to a shack on Kangaroo Island…”🔥QT

stranger

199,339 views • 1 year ago

Unelected bureaucrat David Cameron explains how we need the Rwanda plan because of Brexit 🤦‍♂️ Anushka Asthana, "Hand on heart. If this had come up when you were PM, would you have gone with this Rwanda policy?" David Cameron, "We had a situation where you could return people directly to France.. People land on a beach in Kent, you take them straight back to France.. You therefore break the model of the people smugglers" Anushka Asthana, "Shouldn't you be trying to get that?" David Cameron, "That's not available at the moment" Anushka Asthana, "Because of Brexit?" David Cameron, "(Yes) Because of the situation we are in (having left the EU)" The UK has participated in the Dublin process since it was inaugurated in 1990. When the UK left the EU, the UK left the Dublin agreement and we no longer have the automatic right to return asylum seekers back to France. So Brexit was to take back control from unelected bureaucrats, and here we have David Cameron an unelected bureaucrat in charge of our foreign policy. And Brexit was about taking control of our borders and asylum seekers, and we've lost the ability to return asylum seekers to France, and instead have to spend over £1,000,000 to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, in a 1 in 1 out policy i.e. for every asylum seeker we send to Rwanda, they send us one of their asylum seekers, so we don't have fewer asylum seekers, we're just shuffling asylum seekers around. Hundreds of millions for a PR campaign to appease racists while there is a cost of living crisis in the UK and millions of Brits living in poverty. Disgraceful.

Unelected bureaucrat David Cameron explains how we need the Rwanda plan because of Brexit 🤦‍♂️ Anushka Asthana, "Hand on heart. If this had come up when you were PM, would you have gone with this Rwanda policy?" David Cameron, "We had a situation where you could return people directly to France.. People land on a beach in Kent, you take them straight back to France.. You therefore break the model of the people smugglers" Anushka Asthana, "Shouldn't you be trying to get that?" David Cameron, "That's not available at the moment" Anushka Asthana, "Because of Brexit?" David Cameron, "(Yes) Because of the situation we are in (having left the EU)" The UK has participated in the Dublin process since it was inaugurated in 1990. When the UK left the EU, the UK left the Dublin agreement and we no longer have the automatic right to return asylum seekers back to France. So Brexit was to take back control from unelected bureaucrats, and here we have David Cameron an unelected bureaucrat in charge of our foreign policy. And Brexit was about taking control of our borders and asylum seekers, and we've lost the ability to return asylum seekers to France, and instead have to spend over £1,000,000 to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, in a 1 in 1 out policy i.e. for every asylum seeker we send to Rwanda, they send us one of their asylum seekers, so we don't have fewer asylum seekers, we're just shuffling asylum seekers around. Hundreds of millions for a PR campaign to appease racists while there is a cost of living crisis in the UK and millions of Brits living in poverty. Disgraceful.

Farrukh

1,117,281 views • 2 years ago

Sam Altman: “People talk about how much energy it takes to train an AI model… But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human.”

Sam Altman: “People talk about how much energy it takes to train an AI model… But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human.”

illuminatibot

47,666 views • 3 months ago

Victoria Derbyshire speaks with an asylum seeker from Iran, Nima Moradi "When I left my country, I wasn't thinking about the destination, I was thinking about being safe" "When I was in Greece I was thinking to go to Germany, but when I was granted asylum I thought, because I can speak English, I will go to England" "The Rwanda bill will not stop asylum seekers coming to the UK.. See how many people are trying to cross the channel last night.. People have access to information.. They know the bill has passed.. But still they will try to cross the channel.. Because they will think that they won't be amongst the 1% selected to go to Rwanda" "If there was a safe route for me to claim asylum.. For example if the UK had a center I could claim asylum.. I would do that instead of paying people smugglers £3,000 but I crossed because there was no safe route to apply for asylum"

Victoria Derbyshire speaks with an asylum seeker from Iran, Nima Moradi "When I left my country, I wasn't thinking about the destination, I was thinking about being safe" "When I was in Greece I was thinking to go to Germany, but when I was granted asylum I thought, because I can speak English, I will go to England" "The Rwanda bill will not stop asylum seekers coming to the UK.. See how many people are trying to cross the channel last night.. People have access to information.. They know the bill has passed.. But still they will try to cross the channel.. Because they will think that they won't be amongst the 1% selected to go to Rwanda" "If there was a safe route for me to claim asylum.. For example if the UK had a center I could claim asylum.. I would do that instead of paying people smugglers £3,000 but I crossed because there was no safe route to apply for asylum"

Farrukh

1,042,502 views • 2 years ago

Republicans are on the wrong side of the shutdown. They control the White House, the House and the Senate, but they still need Democrats to keep the government open. All we’re asking for is their help to save healthcare for millions of people about to lose coverage.

Republicans are on the wrong side of the shutdown. They control the White House, the House and the Senate, but they still need Democrats to keep the government open. All we’re asking for is their help to save healthcare for millions of people about to lose coverage.

Christopher Webb

151,000 views • 11 months ago

Anger in the Netherlands after viral videos show the Dutch police beating young people in the town of Loodsdrecht after they decided to protest in front of a planned ad hoc asylum center where the mayor wants to house 110 male asylum seekers The town has just 8000 inhabitants 🇳🇱

Anger in the Netherlands after viral videos show the Dutch police beating young people in the town of Loodsdrecht after they decided to protest in front of a planned ad hoc asylum center where the mayor wants to house 110 male asylum seekers The town has just 8000 inhabitants 🇳🇱

Visegrád 24

94,088 views • 4 months ago

“This idea that somehow we should be scared of all asylum seekers… many of them are just normal people trying to escape very horrible, difficult situations” Economist Faiza Shaheen agrees there’s “chaos” in the asylum system, but only a “minority” of immigrants break the law #bbcqt

“This idea that somehow we should be scared of all asylum seekers… many of them are just normal people trying to escape very horrible, difficult situations” Economist Faiza Shaheen agrees there’s “chaos” in the asylum system, but only a “minority” of immigrants break the law #bbcqt

BBC Question Time

374,772 views • 10 months ago

With Reform announcing on Monday they’ll leave the 1951 Refugee Convention I will repeat again to Labour. Stop people crossing the channel by processing them offshore or the public will vote for a party at the next election who will deal with immigration in a way you’ll hate

With Reform announcing on Monday they’ll leave the 1951 Refugee Convention I will repeat again to Labour. Stop people crossing the channel by processing them offshore or the public will vote for a party at the next election who will deal with immigration in a way you’ll hate

Matthew

29,834 views • 6 months ago

.Alistair Bunkall is live in Bruges, as a Turkish national has been jailed for 11 years after being found guilty of supplying thousands of small boats and engines used by people smugglers to transport asylum seekers across the English Channel.

.Alistair Bunkall is live in Bruges, as a Turkish national has been jailed for 11 years after being found guilty of supplying thousands of small boats and engines used by people smugglers to transport asylum seekers across the English Channel.

Sky News

27,916 views • 7 months ago

The Home Office is attempting to use three more military sites in Bicester, Barnham and Linton-on-Ouse to house thousands of asylum seekers, as the government seeks to move people out of hotels. Justice minister Jake Richards told #BBCBreakfast the sites could house about 3,750 asylum seekers, if planning permission is granted, as well as looking to extend the use of existing military sites in Crowborough until 2030 and Wethersfield beyond 2027.

The Home Office is attempting to use three more military sites in Bicester, Barnham and Linton-on-Ouse to house thousands of asylum seekers, as the government seeks to move people out of hotels. Justice minister Jake Richards told #BBCBreakfast the sites could house about 3,750 asylum seekers, if planning permission is granted, as well as looking to extend the use of existing military sites in Crowborough until 2030 and Wethersfield beyond 2027.

BBC Breakfast

26,539 views • 2 months ago

In the Dutch 🇳🇱 town of #Loosdrecht, for the fourth night in a row, people are preparing for protests against the arrival of 110 male 'asylum seekers'. They are blasting a popular AI-generated anti-asylum song: "We say NO! To the Asylum Center Enough is enough Full is full Away with them Close the gates The Netherlands is FOR OUR PEOPLE"

In the Dutch 🇳🇱 town of #Loosdrecht, for the fourth night in a row, people are preparing for protests against the arrival of 110 male 'asylum seekers'. They are blasting a popular AI-generated anti-asylum song: "We say NO! To the Asylum Center Enough is enough Full is full Away with them Close the gates The Netherlands is FOR OUR PEOPLE"

Johannes M. Koenraadt

13,830 views • 4 months ago

Keir Starmer crucifies Rishi Sunak over the Rwanda Scheme at #PMQs Did you know, if it did pass, we would only be able to send 100 asylum seekers to Rwanda? There are 75,492 asylum seekers in the UK. We are paying Rwanda over £150 million to take 100 asylum seekers. And the agreement also means we take up to 100 asylum seekers from Rwanda. So we aren't shifting the problem away, we're moving asylum seekers around like a game, all the while to appease people who want the UK to crackdown on asylum seekers, while keeping the total number of asylum seekers in the UK the same. If you think the Rwanda sceheme is fixing the asylum seeking system or backlog? Think again. The government thinks you're stupid. And if you believe their dog whistling, I suspect you probably are.

Keir Starmer crucifies Rishi Sunak over the Rwanda Scheme at #PMQs Did you know, if it did pass, we would only be able to send 100 asylum seekers to Rwanda? There are 75,492 asylum seekers in the UK. We are paying Rwanda over £150 million to take 100 asylum seekers. And the agreement also means we take up to 100 asylum seekers from Rwanda. So we aren't shifting the problem away, we're moving asylum seekers around like a game, all the while to appease people who want the UK to crackdown on asylum seekers, while keeping the total number of asylum seekers in the UK the same. If you think the Rwanda sceheme is fixing the asylum seeking system or backlog? Think again. The government thinks you're stupid. And if you believe their dog whistling, I suspect you probably are.

Farrukh

771,739 views • 2 years ago

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"

Farrukh

163,695 views • 1 year ago

Some of that brutality. The scorpions attacking a train to feed on people and rip them apart. This is also the best scene to spot the differences between the head of the stop motion model and that huge prop they wanted us to see over and over.

Some of that brutality. The scorpions attacking a train to feed on people and rip them apart. This is also the best scene to spot the differences between the head of the stop motion model and that huge prop they wanted us to see over and over.

Meso☄️

128,815 views • 3 months ago

A Turkish national has been jailed for 11 years after being found guilty of supplying thousands of small boats and engines used by people smugglers to transport asylum seekers across the English Channel. Sky's Alistair Bunkall explains what we know.

A Turkish national has been jailed for 11 years after being found guilty of supplying thousands of small boats and engines used by people smugglers to transport asylum seekers across the English Channel. Sky's Alistair Bunkall explains what we know.

Sky News

21,128 views • 7 months ago

Napheesa Collier on the impact StudBudz had for the WNBA over all star weekend “I think it changed a lot of things, i think it changed the way people see the W, the way that you’re going to be covered in the W, the exposure of the W. It also gets so negative online… of course when we’re on the court it’s going to get chippy… but that doesn’t mean I don’t respect people off the court (or) that we’re not friends”

Napheesa Collier on the impact StudBudz had for the WNBA over all star weekend “I think it changed a lot of things, i think it changed the way people see the W, the way that you’re going to be covered in the W, the exposure of the W. It also gets so negative online… of course when we’re on the court it’s going to get chippy… but that doesn’t mean I don’t respect people off the court (or) that we’re not friends”

Andrew Dukowitz

113,102 views • 1 year ago