Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Today, I made a commitment to Maryland that, as Senator, I will only vote for nominees who can earn support from both sides of the aisle. If there's one place that we should not be playing politics, it's appointments to the Supreme Court and the cabinet. Partisan gamesmanship undermines...

72,501 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Candidly Tiff's profile picture
Candidly Tiff2 years ago

Memo to Larry on Trump’s “incredible” SCOTUS judges Gorsuch - filled a stolen seat Kavanaugh got one Dem vote - Manchin 🤬 Coney Barrett got ZERO Dem votes Manchin is gone so this an empty promise

ConcernedBystander's profile picture
ConcernedBystander2 years ago

You definitely need to be kept away from voting on judicial appointments.

Donny Donowitz 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 ☮️ 🏈's profile picture
Donny Donowitz 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 ☮️ 🏈2 years ago

Tough to take this seriously after Susan Collins, Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnel changing rules depending on situation.

JeanMarc Back on Twittęr's profile picture
JeanMarc Back on Twittęr2 years ago

Don’t worry we aren’t voting for you and the rest of your maga friends

Deb Lopez (she/her)'s profile picture
Deb Lopez (she/her)2 years ago

Nope. 👎 I don’t believe you after you called the 3 awful, partisan conservative SC justices “great choices.”

Sean Maguire's profile picture
Sean Maguire2 years ago

Larry Hogan does NOT want you asking questions about Judge Jonathan Newell, the child-sex-trafficking in Harford County, MD, or the “Epstein Island of the Eastern Shore,” Hooper’s Island. #MDPedos

OneEyedUndertaker's profile picture
OneEyedUndertaker2 years ago

Not much of record to run on here, Larry When it was in fashion, you vetoed abortion access law Larry = GOP = Maga

Butzi 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇮🇱✡️'s profile picture
Butzi 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇮🇱✡️2 years ago

Weasel, just join the dem party and get it over with

Hope's profile picture
Hope2 years ago

Larry, we have 4 republican votes in Maryland at my house. We won't vote for you. And so are so many republicans in Maryland.

Related Videos

VIDEO | Activist and psephologist Yogendra Yadav, who was a litigant in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case before the Supreme Court, said, "As one of the litigants, I have reasons to be disappointed, but I am shocked. Not shocked only because I was litigant and the judgment did not go in my favor. That can happen. Not shocked because I had expected a very different judgment. For the last few months, the course, the very strange course that this particular case had taken, made it absolutely clear which way things were going. I'm shocked that the Supreme Court of this country has allowed the fundamental democratic principle to be overturned. In a democracy, voters choose the government. The government cannot choose the voters. And the net effect of what the Supreme Court has done today is that now BJP shall decide who can be a voter in this country and who cannot. Technically, you might say Election Commission will decide. But because the same Supreme Court has done absolutely nothing to ensure that the Election Commission's own appointment is a non-partisan way, and given the manner in which the Election Commission behaves these days, it is absolutely true that now BJP decides who will be the voter, and on the basis of their votes, BJP will say, "We have one popular mandate." This is a complete overturning of the fundamental principle of universal adult franchise...I'm astonished that the Supreme Court of India has put its seal of approval on fundamental overturning of democratic principles."

Press Trust of India

75,188 views • 4 months ago