Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Today inflation figures were released, who did #AfternoonBriefing interview about the numbers: Jim Chalmers - Treasurer - nah Katy Gallagher - Finance Minister - nah Stephen Jones - Assistant Treasurer - nah Greg Jennett "checked in" with Liberal Paul Fletcher!!! #Auspol

☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣

40,196 subscribers

67,551 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik #AfternoonBriefing #Auspol

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Andrew Miller

Andrew Millervor 2 Jahren

The others have a job and are working for the country Paul Fletcher is hopefully moments away from losing to @Nicolette_Boele in Bradfield And the @VoicesBradfield will have a voice not a Peter Dutton puppet #auspol

Profilbild von ☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣

☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣vor 2 Jahren

@Nicolette_Boele @VoicesBradfield Paul Fletcher losing his seat would be like Jason Falinski defeat satisfaction 😁😇

Profilbild von Cheryl Kernot

Cheryl Kernotvor 2 Jahren

I often wonder whether Labor has decided to give this program a miss??

Profilbild von ☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣

☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣vor 2 Jahren

Had similar musing Cheryl, today Stephen Hill appeared on Sky News with Tom Connell, today not one Labor MP was interviewed, you would think they would have secured "someone, anyone" in advance given it was an inflation data release day. Maybe its a presenter/producer problem.

Profilbild von Marilyn Raven.

Marilyn Raven.vor 2 Jahren

Yep pathetic isn’t it, I just turn it off

Profilbild von ☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣

☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣vor 2 Jahren

I'd rather Kim Williams fixes the ABC and saves it.

Profilbild von JAH

JAHvor 2 Jahren

@NadiaWa35758056 The best outcome for that useless program would be for it to wither and collapse from lack of audience - from people simply refusing to engage with its irrelevancy.

Profilbild von ☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣

☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣vor 2 Jahren

@NadiaWa35758056 The ABC has one only weekday political current affairs program, I'd prefer the ABC make it better.

Profilbild von Paul Boland 🤦‍♂️🎸🎻🎹🎼

Paul Boland 🤦‍♂️🎸🎻🎹🎼vor 2 Jahren

Well it would have been embarrassing for LNP if he interviewed Angus.

Profilbild von ☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣

☮️💧 Sleeping Giants Oz 📣vor 2 Jahren

I thought so too Paul 😂

Ähnliche Videos

“Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher have announced a budget deficit of $26.9 billion amid a surge in spending by the Albanese government. Mr Chalmers and Ms Gallagher revealed the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook at a press conference on Wednesday. While the $26.9 billion deficit for 2024-25 has been downgraded by $1.3 billion, significantly larger deficits have been forecasted for the next three years.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Australia is facing a decade of deficits caused by the economic mismanagement of the major parties. They have no idea as to how to turn Australia around. In order to get Australia back on track, we need to implement real economic solutions fast. Only People First has the experience and knowledge to implement these solutions. These include: 1) Cutting bureaucratic waste and regulations 2) Abolishing subsidies especially for renewables 3) Cutting income taxes on hardworking Australians 4) Reskilling our workforce with a greater focus on trades and manufacturing rather than domestic services. 5) Increasing Withholding taxes on profits sent offshore 6) Creating an Infrastructure Bank to fund the construction of Dams, Power stations, Road, Rail, Ports and Airports 7) Lower Immigration and put Australians first Quote from: #auspol

“Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher have announced a budget deficit of $26.9 billion amid a surge in spending by the Albanese government. Mr Chalmers and Ms Gallagher revealed the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook at a press conference on Wednesday. While the $26.9 billion deficit for 2024-25 has been downgraded by $1.3 billion, significantly larger deficits have been forecasted for the next three years.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Australia is facing a decade of deficits caused by the economic mismanagement of the major parties. They have no idea as to how to turn Australia around. In order to get Australia back on track, we need to implement real economic solutions fast. Only People First has the experience and knowledge to implement these solutions. These include: 1) Cutting bureaucratic waste and regulations 2) Abolishing subsidies especially for renewables 3) Cutting income taxes on hardworking Australians 4) Reskilling our workforce with a greater focus on trades and manufacturing rather than domestic services. 5) Increasing Withholding taxes on profits sent offshore 6) Creating an Infrastructure Bank to fund the construction of Dams, Power stations, Road, Rail, Ports and Airports 7) Lower Immigration and put Australians first Quote from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

25,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#BREAKING Treasurer Jim Chalmers has appeared on the Today show with Sarah Abo and says that “there are absolute lies being told about the inheritance tax, the treatment of small businesses, that’s just a fact” Abo interjects “like the lies that you told?” Chalmers “I take responsibility for the ambitious tax reforms, we changed our position” Abo “after your budget, you now have a 3rd of the country that has more faith in Pauline Hanson than in you” “You’re pushing through policies that the public doesn’t agree with” “You also said that you’re happy that house prices are falling?” Chalmers “no I didn’t” Abo “you said falling house prices are good for those entering the market” Chalmers “I said it’s a good thing if first homebuyers are getting a crack at auctions” Abo “so you did say it?” Chalmers “only about clearance rates” Abo “but it’s the same thing” “The RBA also disagrees with you and says your housing policy isn’t working?” Chalmers “that was the first term” “We’ve changed our position” This guy should be no where near Government or decision making.

#BREAKING Treasurer Jim Chalmers has appeared on the Today show with Sarah Abo and says that “there are absolute lies being told about the inheritance tax, the treatment of small businesses, that’s just a fact” Abo interjects “like the lies that you told?” Chalmers “I take responsibility for the ambitious tax reforms, we changed our position” Abo “after your budget, you now have a 3rd of the country that has more faith in Pauline Hanson than in you” “You’re pushing through policies that the public doesn’t agree with” “You also said that you’re happy that house prices are falling?” Chalmers “no I didn’t” Abo “you said falling house prices are good for those entering the market” Chalmers “I said it’s a good thing if first homebuyers are getting a crack at auctions” Abo “so you did say it?” Chalmers “only about clearance rates” Abo “but it’s the same thing” “The RBA also disagrees with you and says your housing policy isn’t working?” Chalmers “that was the first term” “We’ve changed our position” This guy should be no where near Government or decision making.

Ryan Dally

146,646 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Last nights budget has revealed the Federal budget has serious structural spending issues that need to be addressed urgently. Labor has allowed deficits to occur out to 2035/36. Why should the Australian public take Labor seriously on economic management when it can’t even rein in deficits over a period of a decade? If Australia was a business that forecast losses for the next decade it would be declared bankrupt and receivers appointed. Why should the Australian public vote for a government that can’t stimulate an economy back into profit given Australia’s vast resources and economic potential! At the start of this term I had a meeting with the Treasurer Jim Chalmers, as I did with former Treasurer Frydenberg where I outlined a number of loopholes in the tax and monetary policy settings that favoured foreign investors. Yet Labor has done nothing to remove these loopholes that would help get the budget into surplus. That’s the worst thing about this budget. Labor doesn’t have the will power or the solutions that will set our children up for the future. #auspol

Last nights budget has revealed the Federal budget has serious structural spending issues that need to be addressed urgently. Labor has allowed deficits to occur out to 2035/36. Why should the Australian public take Labor seriously on economic management when it can’t even rein in deficits over a period of a decade? If Australia was a business that forecast losses for the next decade it would be declared bankrupt and receivers appointed. Why should the Australian public vote for a government that can’t stimulate an economy back into profit given Australia’s vast resources and economic potential! At the start of this term I had a meeting with the Treasurer Jim Chalmers, as I did with former Treasurer Frydenberg where I outlined a number of loopholes in the tax and monetary policy settings that favoured foreign investors. Yet Labor has done nothing to remove these loopholes that would help get the budget into surplus. That’s the worst thing about this budget. Labor doesn’t have the will power or the solutions that will set our children up for the future. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

34,562 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 I AM PISSED OFF! BREAKING: The same Democrats who were SILENT during 179 Iranian terror attacks… I AM PISSED OFF! …who said NOTHING during Benghazi… …who applauded Obama’s 26,000 unauthorized drone strikes… …who shrugged when Biden gifted the Taliban $85 billion in U.S. weapons… are now suddenly constitutional experts because Trump bombed 3 Iranian nuclear sites? Oh please. Shut your lying Democrat mouth. Let me guess—now you care about “congressional approval”? Now you care about “American lives”? Now you’re the party of restraint? 🥴 Sit down, Bernie. 📜 Put the pocket Constitution away, Hakeem. 🧼 Wipe the Benghazi blood off your hands before lecturing us. You weren’t worried about foreign aggression… You were worried Trump did something effective… and didn’t ask your weak little permission slips. These statements are cornier than a Vermont granola bar. The truth? 👀 You can’t trust a Democrat with national security. 👀 You can’t trust a Democrat with borders. 👀 You can’t even trust a Democrat with pronouns. But you’re supposed to believe they suddenly care about Iran? Nah. They’re just mad Trump did what Biden was too scared to do.

🚨 I AM PISSED OFF! BREAKING: The same Democrats who were SILENT during 179 Iranian terror attacks… I AM PISSED OFF! …who said NOTHING during Benghazi… …who applauded Obama’s 26,000 unauthorized drone strikes… …who shrugged when Biden gifted the Taliban $85 billion in U.S. weapons… are now suddenly constitutional experts because Trump bombed 3 Iranian nuclear sites? Oh please. Shut your lying Democrat mouth. Let me guess—now you care about “congressional approval”? Now you care about “American lives”? Now you’re the party of restraint? 🥴 Sit down, Bernie. 📜 Put the pocket Constitution away, Hakeem. 🧼 Wipe the Benghazi blood off your hands before lecturing us. You weren’t worried about foreign aggression… You were worried Trump did something effective… and didn’t ask your weak little permission slips. These statements are cornier than a Vermont granola bar. The truth? 👀 You can’t trust a Democrat with national security. 👀 You can’t trust a Democrat with borders. 👀 You can’t even trust a Democrat with pronouns. But you’re supposed to believe they suddenly care about Iran? Nah. They’re just mad Trump did what Biden was too scared to do.

A Gene Robinson

60,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In Estimates I asked the Finance Minister why retired Canberra bureaucrats should be receiving pensions much higher than those in the private sector, especially when the bureaucrats were highly paid throughout their working careers. The cost of these pensions as modelled by the Finance Department is $335 billion for 165,000 retired bureaucrats. (I am not referring to the military pension.) This works out at $2 million per bureaucrat. There are 40,000 who receive over $75,000 at a cost of $137 billion or almost $3.5 million each despite these people being very highly paid throughout their careers. The fact that both major parties have sat on their hands about this shows they are in bed with the Canberra bureaucracy. Don’t believe them when they say they care about hard working Australians. They don’t. If they did they would stop this rort immediately. PeopleFirst is the only party that has a policy to end this theft of taxpayers money. #auspol

In Estimates I asked the Finance Minister why retired Canberra bureaucrats should be receiving pensions much higher than those in the private sector, especially when the bureaucrats were highly paid throughout their working careers. The cost of these pensions as modelled by the Finance Department is $335 billion for 165,000 retired bureaucrats. (I am not referring to the military pension.) This works out at $2 million per bureaucrat. There are 40,000 who receive over $75,000 at a cost of $137 billion or almost $3.5 million each despite these people being very highly paid throughout their careers. The fact that both major parties have sat on their hands about this shows they are in bed with the Canberra bureaucracy. Don’t believe them when they say they care about hard working Australians. They don’t. If they did they would stop this rort immediately. PeopleFirst is the only party that has a policy to end this theft of taxpayers money. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

40,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When I was a kid, I started following politics, glued to the TV set watching Pierre Trudeau sparring with Quebec separatist Premier Rene Levesque on the one hand and the Conservatives on the other as his government brought our Constitution home and created our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is what inspired me to become a Liberal. I was a child of Dutch immigrants and I was excited about a Prime Minister who fought against nationalism in Quebec and for a Canada that was more independent of Britain, so that people who were neither English nor French would be considered just as Canadian as everyone else. I heard from my parents and in school about what a much more dangerous nationalism did in Europe. It was the reason why our families immigrated after World War II. And I saw Conservatives against all of this, fighting against the Charter and nit-picking against this patriation, just like they were originally against our own Canadian flag. So I am really happy to celebrate today as the 44th anniversary of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Cheers to Pierre Trudeau!

When I was a kid, I started following politics, glued to the TV set watching Pierre Trudeau sparring with Quebec separatist Premier Rene Levesque on the one hand and the Conservatives on the other as his government brought our Constitution home and created our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is what inspired me to become a Liberal. I was a child of Dutch immigrants and I was excited about a Prime Minister who fought against nationalism in Quebec and for a Canada that was more independent of Britain, so that people who were neither English nor French would be considered just as Canadian as everyone else. I heard from my parents and in school about what a much more dangerous nationalism did in Europe. It was the reason why our families immigrated after World War II. And I saw Conservatives against all of this, fighting against the Charter and nit-picking against this patriation, just like they were originally against our own Canadian flag. So I am really happy to celebrate today as the 44th anniversary of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Cheers to Pierre Trudeau!

Mark Marissen

47,527 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Alan Greenspan, who was the chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, did an interview in late 2007 when concerns began to grow in the minds of the public about the impending collapse of the economy and rising inflation, where he says something that is really important to remember in 2023. In this interview for News Hour with Jim Lehrer, he was asked about the relationship between the President of the US and the Federal Reserve, and his response should horrify everyone and always be kept in mind when the government is threatening shutdowns and giving billions of dollars to Ukraine and other countries, while people in America are being bankrupted by medical costs and barely able to afford groceries with rising inflation from their reckless continual printing. He says that the Federal Reserve is an independent agency that is not apart of the US government, and is above the law where the relationship between them doesn't matter. They can print as much money as they want and no one can stop them. This is why politics is largely theater in my eyes and the fate of nations is not in the hands of the people or their votes, but in the hands of multinational central banking organizations that exist above all the governments. Ron Paul was trying to tell people this decades ago, and no one would listen and said he was crazy. Now we're here with $30+ trillion dollars of debt, mass inflation with cost of living growing with it, mega-corporations like Blackrock and Vanguard owning everything, and the impending collapse of the middle class for the beloved great reset where we are all slaves to the same system. To quote Thomas Jefferson: “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” “I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

Alan Greenspan, who was the chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, did an interview in late 2007 when concerns began to grow in the minds of the public about the impending collapse of the economy and rising inflation, where he says something that is really important to remember in 2023. In this interview for News Hour with Jim Lehrer, he was asked about the relationship between the President of the US and the Federal Reserve, and his response should horrify everyone and always be kept in mind when the government is threatening shutdowns and giving billions of dollars to Ukraine and other countries, while people in America are being bankrupted by medical costs and barely able to afford groceries with rising inflation from their reckless continual printing. He says that the Federal Reserve is an independent agency that is not apart of the US government, and is above the law where the relationship between them doesn't matter. They can print as much money as they want and no one can stop them. This is why politics is largely theater in my eyes and the fate of nations is not in the hands of the people or their votes, but in the hands of multinational central banking organizations that exist above all the governments. Ron Paul was trying to tell people this decades ago, and no one would listen and said he was crazy. Now we're here with $30+ trillion dollars of debt, mass inflation with cost of living growing with it, mega-corporations like Blackrock and Vanguard owning everything, and the impending collapse of the middle class for the beloved great reset where we are all slaves to the same system. To quote Thomas Jefferson: “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” “I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

Inversionism

2,017,046 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Stop lying Albanese “The Australian Labor Party has formally enshrined support for Welcome to Country and Acknowledgement of Country ceremonies in its updated draft national platform." V "Foreign investors and superannuation funds will typically pay much lower capital gains tax on non-property assets in Australia than local individuals, as a result of the Albanese government’s budget changes which widen the tax gap between different investors. As Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Tuesday continued to defend the proposed changes to CGT, saying Labor was about “a fair go for first home buyers”, local investors said the government was offering a better deal to big super funds and investors living abroad compared with individuals at home." ••••••••••• This word salad from Albanese really goes to show why he is unfit to lead the country. After saying he has never focused on culture wars he then goes on a mind bending semantic word salad about entering countries and welcoming people to their own homes. In other words he contradicted his initial statement by engaging in culture wars. Albanese has always been a culture warrior for the simple reason he has no real solutions to fix the economic malaise the Australian economy is in. In fact he seems determined to punish hard working Australians by imposing higher taxes on them than foreigners and his mates in the Superannuation industry. As Prime Minister for Australia he should rise above the culture war rhetoric and instead unify the nation by focusing on what all Australians want - greater prosperity and a better life for their children. He should focus on lower taxes, less regulation and more efficient government spending. At People First we know that the best way to make people welcome in their own country is to through better economic management of the economy so they can own a home. Sign up today at if you agree.

Stop lying Albanese “The Australian Labor Party has formally enshrined support for Welcome to Country and Acknowledgement of Country ceremonies in its updated draft national platform." V "Foreign investors and superannuation funds will typically pay much lower capital gains tax on non-property assets in Australia than local individuals, as a result of the Albanese government’s budget changes which widen the tax gap between different investors. As Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Tuesday continued to defend the proposed changes to CGT, saying Labor was about “a fair go for first home buyers”, local investors said the government was offering a better deal to big super funds and investors living abroad compared with individuals at home." ••••••••••• This word salad from Albanese really goes to show why he is unfit to lead the country. After saying he has never focused on culture wars he then goes on a mind bending semantic word salad about entering countries and welcoming people to their own homes. In other words he contradicted his initial statement by engaging in culture wars. Albanese has always been a culture warrior for the simple reason he has no real solutions to fix the economic malaise the Australian economy is in. In fact he seems determined to punish hard working Australians by imposing higher taxes on them than foreigners and his mates in the Superannuation industry. As Prime Minister for Australia he should rise above the culture war rhetoric and instead unify the nation by focusing on what all Australians want - greater prosperity and a better life for their children. He should focus on lower taxes, less regulation and more efficient government spending. At People First we know that the best way to make people welcome in their own country is to through better economic management of the economy so they can own a home. Sign up today at if you agree.

Gerard Rennick

24,364 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

What we saw in Question Period today was a masterclass in financial denial. I laid out the numbers, real, unavoidable numbers, showing that British Columbians pay $18.5 billion in income tax and $5.1 billion of it now goes straight to servicing this government’s debt. And what did the Finance Minister offer in response? A “news flash” Well, here’s my news flash: When 30 cents of every income tax dollar is being vacuumed up by interest payments, you don’t get to pretend everything is fine. She insisted this was all “reasonable,” as though families in British Columbia aren’t already drowning in record affordability pressures. She rambled on about hospitals and schools as if that somehow explains why nearly half the debt her government accumulated isn’t for infrastructure at all, but for operating deficits, overspending with nothing permanent to show for it. Then came the talking points: ICBC, rent, child care, the same stale list she recites whenever she needs to fill airtime. Not a single word about why British Columbia now leads the country in unaffordability. Not a single word about why people are leaving this province in numbers we haven’t seen in decades. Not a single word about why debt-service costs are exploding while outcomes get worse. And the punchline? She actually expects British Columbians to feel grateful, grateful that their government has maxed out the provincial credit card and now hands them a bill worth more than the “rebates” they were promised. Grateful that interest payments, not public services, are eating their paycheques. If she wants to throw around “news flashes,” here’s one she can pin to her desk: A government that can’t live within its means has no business lecturing families who are trying to live within theirs. The truth is simple: British Columbians aren’t struggling because the economy changed British Columbians are struggling because the NDP changed the economy They turned prosperity into debt, affordability into crisis, and fiscal responsibility into a punchline And one more news flash for the Minister The affordability crisis didn’t just happen under David Eby. It happened because of David Eby. #cdnpoli #bcpoli

What we saw in Question Period today was a masterclass in financial denial. I laid out the numbers, real, unavoidable numbers, showing that British Columbians pay $18.5 billion in income tax and $5.1 billion of it now goes straight to servicing this government’s debt. And what did the Finance Minister offer in response? A “news flash” Well, here’s my news flash: When 30 cents of every income tax dollar is being vacuumed up by interest payments, you don’t get to pretend everything is fine. She insisted this was all “reasonable,” as though families in British Columbia aren’t already drowning in record affordability pressures. She rambled on about hospitals and schools as if that somehow explains why nearly half the debt her government accumulated isn’t for infrastructure at all, but for operating deficits, overspending with nothing permanent to show for it. Then came the talking points: ICBC, rent, child care, the same stale list she recites whenever she needs to fill airtime. Not a single word about why British Columbia now leads the country in unaffordability. Not a single word about why people are leaving this province in numbers we haven’t seen in decades. Not a single word about why debt-service costs are exploding while outcomes get worse. And the punchline? She actually expects British Columbians to feel grateful, grateful that their government has maxed out the provincial credit card and now hands them a bill worth more than the “rebates” they were promised. Grateful that interest payments, not public services, are eating their paycheques. If she wants to throw around “news flashes,” here’s one she can pin to her desk: A government that can’t live within its means has no business lecturing families who are trying to live within theirs. The truth is simple: British Columbians aren’t struggling because the economy changed British Columbians are struggling because the NDP changed the economy They turned prosperity into debt, affordability into crisis, and fiscal responsibility into a punchline And one more news flash for the Minister The affordability crisis didn’t just happen under David Eby. It happened because of David Eby. #cdnpoli #bcpoli

John Rustad

23,660 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Who Are The Tajiks: Past & Present Australian Network Interview of Professor Richard Foltz - Tajiks are Iranians of the East. - 3 Million Tajiks registered officially in Russia. Millions more unregistered. - 16th Century Shia-Sunni schism divided the Iranian world, with Persians in contemporary Iran being Shia, and Persians in Afghanistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan being Sunni. - the Ethnic, Heritage and Cultural ties still bind east and west Iranians. - Nowruz is a worldwide Tajik/Persian cultural festival that's celebrated from Mongolia to Bosnia. - The largest group of Tajiks is in Khorasan (currently Talibanistan/Afghanistan), comprising of 40-50% of the people. - Economic and cultural capitals of Tajik civilization Samarqand, Bukhara and Ferghana were taken from Tajiks by the Bolsheviks and given to Turkic nomads. Similar to how Tajik majority Khorasan was given to Indic nomads by the British. - 30-50% of Uzbekistan is Tajik but the Uzbek government prevents a census to hide figures. (Similar to Afghan governments preventing a census to hide Tajik numbers.) - The most famous poet of the world today is a Tajik/Persian (Rumi). - Tajik/Persian/Iranian heritage goes back to over 3,000 years. - In the 10th century, Tajik Bukhara outpaced Baghdad as the major centre of Islamic learning. - Tajiks/Persians/Iranians were the custodians of Islamic civilization, institutions, culture and education. - Uzbeks were pastoral nomads that were slowly urbanized and Islamized by the Tajiks. - The Bolsheviks were on a mission to sabotage this historic past and displace it all. - The Uzbeks were a cultural and historic blank page that the Bolsheviks could write whatever they wanted on. 'Uzbek' became a national identity due to Soviet social engineering. - Land, heritage and culture belonging to Tajiks, was taken from Tajiks and given to Uzbeks. (Similar to what the British did with handing over Tajik Persianate civilization to nomadic Afghans from the Indian subcontinent).

Who Are The Tajiks: Past & Present Australian Network Interview of Professor Richard Foltz - Tajiks are Iranians of the East. - 3 Million Tajiks registered officially in Russia. Millions more unregistered. - 16th Century Shia-Sunni schism divided the Iranian world, with Persians in contemporary Iran being Shia, and Persians in Afghanistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan being Sunni. - the Ethnic, Heritage and Cultural ties still bind east and west Iranians. - Nowruz is a worldwide Tajik/Persian cultural festival that's celebrated from Mongolia to Bosnia. - The largest group of Tajiks is in Khorasan (currently Talibanistan/Afghanistan), comprising of 40-50% of the people. - Economic and cultural capitals of Tajik civilization Samarqand, Bukhara and Ferghana were taken from Tajiks by the Bolsheviks and given to Turkic nomads. Similar to how Tajik majority Khorasan was given to Indic nomads by the British. - 30-50% of Uzbekistan is Tajik but the Uzbek government prevents a census to hide figures. (Similar to Afghan governments preventing a census to hide Tajik numbers.) - The most famous poet of the world today is a Tajik/Persian (Rumi). - Tajik/Persian/Iranian heritage goes back to over 3,000 years. - In the 10th century, Tajik Bukhara outpaced Baghdad as the major centre of Islamic learning. - Tajiks/Persians/Iranians were the custodians of Islamic civilization, institutions, culture and education. - Uzbeks were pastoral nomads that were slowly urbanized and Islamized by the Tajiks. - The Bolsheviks were on a mission to sabotage this historic past and displace it all. - The Uzbeks were a cultural and historic blank page that the Bolsheviks could write whatever they wanted on. 'Uzbek' became a national identity due to Soviet social engineering. - Land, heritage and culture belonging to Tajiks, was taken from Tajiks and given to Uzbeks. (Similar to what the British did with handing over Tajik Persianate civilization to nomadic Afghans from the Indian subcontinent).

Hello, PhD

20,516 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨NEW: Chairman Jason Smith's opening statement for President Joe Biden's impeachment inquiry. "Yesterday, the Ways and Means Committee released new documents showing President Biden was not just aware of his son's business dealings, but he was connected to them. And a newly released message to a Chinese business executive Hunter Biden mentions preserving the 'keys to my family's only asset,' that asset being Joe Biden. New evidence released in response to questions raised by members of the committee on both sides when Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, the two IRS whistleblowers, testified in July paints a disturbing picture of a revolving door between Joe Biden's office and Hunter Biden's business partners. According to a worksheet provided by IRS whistleblower Ziegler, then Vice President Biden's April 2014 official visit to Ukraine occurred only days after a series of White House meetings with Hunter Biden and his business associates regarding Ukraine. Shortly after Joe Biden returned stateside, the Ukrainian company Burisma announced Hunter Biden's appointment to its board. New evidence provided shows Hunter Biden using his father's position to gain favor with billionaire Miguel Alemán including having Joe Biden host them at the White House in February of 2014 at the Vice President's residence alongside Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim in November of 2015. And then, in 2016, he used Air Force Two to shuttle Hunter Biden and his business associate to Mexico City. Whether it was lunches, phone calls, White House meetings, or official foreign trips, Hunter Biden cashed in by arranging access to Joe Biden, the family brand. The Biden family and their associates received millions in payments from foreign sources, including from Russia, China, Ukraine, and Romania. In one email, Hunter Biden even bragged that he cut a deal for 10 million from just one company for "introductions alone." And yet the DOJ wanted to keep the spotlight as far from Joe Biden as possible. One of the items we released yesterday was an IRS interview with James Biden, the President's brother, in September of 2022. The agency was barred in the interview from asking him about Joe Biden, and about whether Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden's deal with a Chinese energy company. And when Hunter Biden had his tax liability of over 2 million, mysteriously paid for by a Democrat Party donor named Kevin Morris, who we barely knew, something IRS investigators saw as a possible campaign finance violation. Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf said she did not want any of the agents to look into the allegation... This is the same Attorney Wolf, who, in an email, we released yesterday, responded to IRS investigators seeking approval for a search warrant with 'there should be nothing about Political Figure One in here.' That being a reference to Joe Biden."

KanekoaTheGreat

184,598 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Joe Rogan and Joe DeRosa discover that Honeymooners creator Jackie Gleason walked away from $7,000,000 left on his contract in 1956 because he didn’t want to “cheapen” the show. That's about $83,000,000 in today’s money, or $1,000,000 per episode. ROGAN: “There’s only one season?” DEROSA: "He did 39 episodes. And he was like, 'We did it. It's done.' Nobody does that now. They were like, 'You have to do more of these.' And he's like, 'Nope, we did it. We're good. We have nothing left to say.'" ROGAN: "Really?" DEROSA: "Yeah. And then they did reunion shows and shit. But, like, that was it. That's wild!" DEROSA: "Look at this. He had $7 million left in his contract in 1956, which is crazy money. [Gleason said], 'The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.'" ROGAN: "Wow." DEROSA: "I mean, that is baller shit back then. Like, that is not something people were doing back then." ROGAN: "Or he just got lazy because he had so much money." JAMIE: "CBS was gonna give him a three-year contract for what would have been $132 million today. He was going to get close to like a million dollars an episode." ROGAN: "A million an episode back then?" JAMIE: "No, no, no. [In today's dollars]." DEROSA: "When Seinfeld... announced they were all going to get a million an episode, I remember that was like groundbreaking... This guy was offered the equivalent of that back in '56 and said, 'Nah, I'm good.'" In December 1954, Gleason signed a three-year, $11,000,000 deal with Buick and CBS, the largest contract in television history at the time. The deal called for two seasons with an option for a third, but he stopped after one, leaving roughly $7,000,000 on the table. Gleason said: “The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.”

Joe Rogan and Joe DeRosa discover that Honeymooners creator Jackie Gleason walked away from $7,000,000 left on his contract in 1956 because he didn’t want to “cheapen” the show. That's about $83,000,000 in today’s money, or $1,000,000 per episode. ROGAN: “There’s only one season?” DEROSA: "He did 39 episodes. And he was like, 'We did it. It's done.' Nobody does that now. They were like, 'You have to do more of these.' And he's like, 'Nope, we did it. We're good. We have nothing left to say.'" ROGAN: "Really?" DEROSA: "Yeah. And then they did reunion shows and shit. But, like, that was it. That's wild!" DEROSA: "Look at this. He had $7 million left in his contract in 1956, which is crazy money. [Gleason said], 'The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.'" ROGAN: "Wow." DEROSA: "I mean, that is baller shit back then. Like, that is not something people were doing back then." ROGAN: "Or he just got lazy because he had so much money." JAMIE: "CBS was gonna give him a three-year contract for what would have been $132 million today. He was going to get close to like a million dollars an episode." ROGAN: "A million an episode back then?" JAMIE: "No, no, no. [In today's dollars]." DEROSA: "When Seinfeld... announced they were all going to get a million an episode, I remember that was like groundbreaking... This guy was offered the equivalent of that back in '56 and said, 'Nah, I'm good.'" In December 1954, Gleason signed a three-year, $11,000,000 deal with Buick and CBS, the largest contract in television history at the time. The deal called for two seasons with an option for a third, but he stopped after one, leaving roughly $7,000,000 on the table. Gleason said: “The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

130,442 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

This week I’m in estimates again and will be lining up the usual suspects. I’m keen to get to the bottom of Albanese’s road being funded by the taxpayer and if the AFP have charged the politician who sold us out. This will be the last of estimates before we go to the next Federal election. Over the last six years I have developed a reputation as being extremely effective in exposing government corruption. Some examples of this include: • There are 40 different climate models used to calculate net zero. • The Bureau of Meteorology manipulates weather station temperatures up to 500 million times to homogenise it to create the false narrative of a warming planet. • The RBA is aware that the Bank of England holds fake gold bars with duplicate serial numbers and does nothing about it. • That the cost of interest and land is not included in inflation figures. • The Australian Federal Police blatantly lied about the size of the crowd in front of Parliament House on February 12th 2022. • The TGA did not report on the death of a man whose autopsy reports that confirmed that his death from the vaccine. • The TGA did not review reported deaths about the vaccine. • Exposed the TGA on numerous occasions for lying about the effectiveness and safety of the Covid vaccine. • That the Intelligence Agencies refuse to investigate or acknowledge the origins of Covid. • That ASIO or the AFP will not disclose any information about a politician that sold Australia out. • The Auditor General lied about the real market of land value at Leppington Triangle. • The Albanese government will not explain why they spent $100 million to upgrade a road to the Prime Ministers new beach house. If you believe in transparency and accountability, then I ask for your support at the next Federal Election so I can continue to ask the hard questions of Government for another six years. Senators in the major parties won’t ask the hard questions that I do, and many senators from minor parties don’t even turn up to estimates. To help out you can become a member at People First, donate or volunteer at the link below. #auspol

This week I’m in estimates again and will be lining up the usual suspects. I’m keen to get to the bottom of Albanese’s road being funded by the taxpayer and if the AFP have charged the politician who sold us out. This will be the last of estimates before we go to the next Federal election. Over the last six years I have developed a reputation as being extremely effective in exposing government corruption. Some examples of this include: • There are 40 different climate models used to calculate net zero. • The Bureau of Meteorology manipulates weather station temperatures up to 500 million times to homogenise it to create the false narrative of a warming planet. • The RBA is aware that the Bank of England holds fake gold bars with duplicate serial numbers and does nothing about it. • That the cost of interest and land is not included in inflation figures. • The Australian Federal Police blatantly lied about the size of the crowd in front of Parliament House on February 12th 2022. • The TGA did not report on the death of a man whose autopsy reports that confirmed that his death from the vaccine. • The TGA did not review reported deaths about the vaccine. • Exposed the TGA on numerous occasions for lying about the effectiveness and safety of the Covid vaccine. • That the Intelligence Agencies refuse to investigate or acknowledge the origins of Covid. • That ASIO or the AFP will not disclose any information about a politician that sold Australia out. • The Auditor General lied about the real market of land value at Leppington Triangle. • The Albanese government will not explain why they spent $100 million to upgrade a road to the Prime Ministers new beach house. If you believe in transparency and accountability, then I ask for your support at the next Federal Election so I can continue to ask the hard questions of Government for another six years. Senators in the major parties won’t ask the hard questions that I do, and many senators from minor parties don’t even turn up to estimates. To help out you can become a member at People First, donate or volunteer at the link below. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

59,036 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is an astonishing attempt at gaslighting by Paul Camuso, not William Shatner. Paul, do you understand that the Brent Spiner interview is still online? You can't lie to our faces and expect everyone to forget what Spiner actually said. As we can see below, Spiner did NOT tell a funny story about mistakenly thinking Shatner was angry with him. That is a bad-faith misleading spin of his story. What Spiner actually described was an online "William Shatner" engaging into an online fight with him that the actual William Shatner had no knowledge about. And there is other public evidence that makes your lies even more absurd. Mr Shatner himself told Vanity Fair publicly that he had hired someone to "do Twitter" for him. And according to Courthouse News, you, Paul Camuso, have been included in a libel lawsuit pertaining to posts by the William Shatner Twitter account. If Mr Shatner himself is the one posting, why were you included as a defendant? Also, are we now supposed to believe that a 95-year-old William Shatner — one of the busiest and most accomplished living cultural icons in the world — personally spends his time digging through replies, keeping track of obscure internet drama, fighting lifelong fans, blocking people, researching what strangers have said about him, and engaging in these bizarre petty feuds all day? I don’t believe it. At all. Star Trek means a tremendous amount to me. Captain Kirk is my favorite Star Trek captain and has been a genuine model to me of courage, loyalty and command. And when historians of the real 23rd century study who the major cultural figures of our era were, they will think legendary William Shatner actually spent his final decades obsessively fighting strangers on the internet, insulting lifelong fans and involving himself in petty online drama. All thanks to Paul Caruso writing his insecurities into William Shatner's historical record. That's why this saddens me. Mr Shatner's legacy deserves better. I hope someone in William Shatner’s family sees what is happening and takes a serious look at who is speaking to the world in his name.

This is an astonishing attempt at gaslighting by Paul Camuso, not William Shatner. Paul, do you understand that the Brent Spiner interview is still online? You can't lie to our faces and expect everyone to forget what Spiner actually said. As we can see below, Spiner did NOT tell a funny story about mistakenly thinking Shatner was angry with him. That is a bad-faith misleading spin of his story. What Spiner actually described was an online "William Shatner" engaging into an online fight with him that the actual William Shatner had no knowledge about. And there is other public evidence that makes your lies even more absurd. Mr Shatner himself told Vanity Fair publicly that he had hired someone to "do Twitter" for him. And according to Courthouse News, you, Paul Camuso, have been included in a libel lawsuit pertaining to posts by the William Shatner Twitter account. If Mr Shatner himself is the one posting, why were you included as a defendant? Also, are we now supposed to believe that a 95-year-old William Shatner — one of the busiest and most accomplished living cultural icons in the world — personally spends his time digging through replies, keeping track of obscure internet drama, fighting lifelong fans, blocking people, researching what strangers have said about him, and engaging in these bizarre petty feuds all day? I don’t believe it. At all. Star Trek means a tremendous amount to me. Captain Kirk is my favorite Star Trek captain and has been a genuine model to me of courage, loyalty and command. And when historians of the real 23rd century study who the major cultural figures of our era were, they will think legendary William Shatner actually spent his final decades obsessively fighting strangers on the internet, insulting lifelong fans and involving himself in petty online drama. All thanks to Paul Caruso writing his insecurities into William Shatner's historical record. That's why this saddens me. Mr Shatner's legacy deserves better. I hope someone in William Shatner’s family sees what is happening and takes a serious look at who is speaking to the world in his name.

Dan Vasc

61,887 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag