Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🔴 Today the 🇪🇺 Commission has fined Google €2.95 billion over abusive practices in the online advertising technology industry, AdTech. Google distorted competition by favouring its own services, harming rivals, advertisers and publishers. More info ⬇️

EU_Competition's profile picture

EU Competition 🇪🇺

24,435 subscribers

43,612 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политикаФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

During the 2019 Berkshire Hathaway AGM, Buffett and Munger said they “screwed up” by not buying Google at its IPO. They avoided tech but has “insights” into Google because GEICO was paying “$10 a click” when the marginal cost was $0 and they could see in their “own operations how well Google advertising was working.” Munger then said that Apple was their “atonement”.
1:09

During the 2019 Berkshire Hathaway AGM, Buffett and Munger said they “screwed up” by not buying Google at its IPO. They avoided tech but has “insights” into Google because GEICO was paying “$10 a click” when the marginal cost was $0 and they could see in their “own operations how well Google advertising was working.” Munger then said that Apple was their “atonement”.

Trung Phan

742,658 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

In April, we dropped Google Gemini for macOS, building over 100 features in less than 100 days. Now more are coming, including Gemini Spark and powerful voice understanding technology. Josh Woodward showcases some of the new features at #GoogleIO ⬇️
1:50

In April, we dropped Google Gemini for macOS, building over 100 features in less than 100 days. Now more are coming, including Gemini Spark and powerful voice understanding technology. Josh Woodward showcases some of the new features at #GoogleIO ⬇️

Google

139,553 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

FT Exclusive: Google DeepMind chief Sir Demis Hassabis has warned that exuberance in parts of the AI industry looks increasingly 'bubble-like', while arguing that its scale and technology leave the Big Tech group well placed for any potential reckoning.
1:36

FT Exclusive: Google DeepMind chief Sir Demis Hassabis has warned that exuberance in parts of the AI industry looks increasingly 'bubble-like', while arguing that its scale and technology leave the Big Tech group well placed for any potential reckoning.

Financial Times

92,404 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Google is making $62 billion a quarter destroying the websites it NEEDS to survive. This is literally a death spiral that ends with Google killing itself. Let me explain what's going on... Google added AI summaries to the top of every search result in 2024. When you Google something now, the answer sits right there on Google's page. You never have to click anywhere. Google took the information from someone else's website, summarized it, and kept you inside Google's ecosystem. The result: 60% of all Google searches now end without a single click to any website. Small publishers lost 60% of their traffic in one year. Medium publishers lost 47%. Even the biggest names in media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Business Insider, all saw traffic fall between 22% and 55%. The Axios CEO called it "a referral extinction event for the ad-supported web." Google's response to all of this was to tell publishers they can "opt out" of having their content summarized. But opting out also REMOVES your description from normal search results. So the choice Google gives you is let us steal your content for free, or become invisible on the internet. That's extortion. The Washington Post laid off another round of journalists this year because of it. Stereogum, one of the most respected music publications on the internet, had to BEG readers for donations. Business Insider cut 21% of its staff. Dozens of smaller publishers have shut down entirely. The people who actually CREATE the information Google summarizes are going bankrupt while Google posts record revenue. But here's where this gets interesting and where everyone stops thinking: Google's AI summaries are only as good as the content they summarize. If the publishers who write the original articles, run the original investigations, and create the original data go out of business, there is nothing left for Google to summarize. The AI starts recycling old information, the answers get stale, the quality drops, and users start noticing that Google's summaries are increasingly wrong, outdated, or useless. Google is essentially strip-mining the internet for short-term revenue. They are extracting all the value from content creators without paying for it, driving those creators out of business, and then wondering why the quality of their own product is declining. This is exactly what Napster did to the music industry in the early 2000s: Made content free, creators went broke, and quality collapsed. It took a decade to rebuild. Google is doing the same thing to the entire internet at 100x the scale. Rolling Stone, Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, and Billboard are now suing Google for antitrust violations. Chegg, the education platform, lost 49% of its traffic and is suing too. The UK's competition authority just ordered Google to let publishers opt out without being punished. The DOJ already ruled Google is an illegal monopoly. And Google's defense in court is genuinely unbelievable. They argue that publishers CHOOSE to let Google index their content and can leave anytime they want. That's like saying you choose to pay protection money to the mob because technically you could close your business and move to another city. Google controls 90% of search. Leaving Google means leaving the internet. Meanwhile Google is investing billions in custom AI chips to make these summaries cheaper at scale. Every quarter the problem gets worse. The internet as we've known it for 25 years ran on a simple deal: Publishers make content. Google sends traffic. Advertisers pay for the traffic. Everyone wins. But Google just BROKE that deal and kept all the money.
4:13

Google is making $62 billion a quarter destroying the websites it NEEDS to survive. This is literally a death spiral that ends with Google killing itself. Let me explain what's going on... Google added AI summaries to the top of every search result in 2024. When you Google something now, the answer sits right there on Google's page. You never have to click anywhere. Google took the information from someone else's website, summarized it, and kept you inside Google's ecosystem. The result: 60% of all Google searches now end without a single click to any website. Small publishers lost 60% of their traffic in one year. Medium publishers lost 47%. Even the biggest names in media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Business Insider, all saw traffic fall between 22% and 55%. The Axios CEO called it "a referral extinction event for the ad-supported web." Google's response to all of this was to tell publishers they can "opt out" of having their content summarized. But opting out also REMOVES your description from normal search results. So the choice Google gives you is let us steal your content for free, or become invisible on the internet. That's extortion. The Washington Post laid off another round of journalists this year because of it. Stereogum, one of the most respected music publications on the internet, had to BEG readers for donations. Business Insider cut 21% of its staff. Dozens of smaller publishers have shut down entirely. The people who actually CREATE the information Google summarizes are going bankrupt while Google posts record revenue. But here's where this gets interesting and where everyone stops thinking: Google's AI summaries are only as good as the content they summarize. If the publishers who write the original articles, run the original investigations, and create the original data go out of business, there is nothing left for Google to summarize. The AI starts recycling old information, the answers get stale, the quality drops, and users start noticing that Google's summaries are increasingly wrong, outdated, or useless. Google is essentially strip-mining the internet for short-term revenue. They are extracting all the value from content creators without paying for it, driving those creators out of business, and then wondering why the quality of their own product is declining. This is exactly what Napster did to the music industry in the early 2000s: Made content free, creators went broke, and quality collapsed. It took a decade to rebuild. Google is doing the same thing to the entire internet at 100x the scale. Rolling Stone, Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, and Billboard are now suing Google for antitrust violations. Chegg, the education platform, lost 49% of its traffic and is suing too. The UK's competition authority just ordered Google to let publishers opt out without being punished. The DOJ already ruled Google is an illegal monopoly. And Google's defense in court is genuinely unbelievable. They argue that publishers CHOOSE to let Google index their content and can leave anytime they want. That's like saying you choose to pay protection money to the mob because technically you could close your business and move to another city. Google controls 90% of search. Leaving Google means leaving the internet. Meanwhile Google is investing billions in custom AI chips to make these summaries cheaper at scale. Every quarter the problem gets worse. The internet as we've known it for 25 years ran on a simple deal: Publishers make content. Google sends traffic. Advertisers pay for the traffic. Everyone wins. But Google just BROKE that deal and kept all the money.

Ricardo

250,877 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I'm going through the Google News Initiative (Google News Initiative) and today's session was about ad revenue. Took a few minutes to offer some thoughts on how Google's HCU was hurting small publishers, and express concerns over their decision to block links to California publishers. We were told at the beginning of the session that it was being recorded on Google's end, to include comments made in the chatroom. Some of the issues I address: 1.) Google's HCU (Helpful Content Updates) are prioritizing SPAM-written content over original, authoritative pieces, contrary to Google's assertion that it rewards helpful, original content with rank. 2.) Google's Google SearchLiaison has heard complaints from me and other publishers for months, and has offered an unsatisfactory "we'll pass it along." 3.) Google appears aware of the issues, but hasn't addressed or fixed them. 4.) Google is further penalizing California publishers by deliberately not linking to news content out of protest of pending state legislation that specifically addresses Google's outsized control over the Internet and attempts (albeit through flawed reasoning) to level the playing field. 5.) While there was a part in today's session about "recapturing" revenue, no one addressed how publishers can navigate the ever-changing Google Search algorithms and other times when Google decides on a whim to move the goal posts to the detriment of good, original content publishers. I had a direct pipeline to Google today, and felt I had to speak up on behalf of other small and niche publishers who have been just as impacted and who feel they have no voice. Lily Ray 😏 Barry Schwartz John 🧀 ... 🧀 CA News Publishers Association News/Media Alliance Media Guild of the West 🧭 PacificMediaWorkers
9:09

I'm going through the Google News Initiative (Google News Initiative) and today's session was about ad revenue. Took a few minutes to offer some thoughts on how Google's HCU was hurting small publishers, and express concerns over their decision to block links to California publishers. We were told at the beginning of the session that it was being recorded on Google's end, to include comments made in the chatroom. Some of the issues I address: 1.) Google's HCU (Helpful Content Updates) are prioritizing SPAM-written content over original, authoritative pieces, contrary to Google's assertion that it rewards helpful, original content with rank. 2.) Google's Google SearchLiaison has heard complaints from me and other publishers for months, and has offered an unsatisfactory "we'll pass it along." 3.) Google appears aware of the issues, but hasn't addressed or fixed them. 4.) Google is further penalizing California publishers by deliberately not linking to news content out of protest of pending state legislation that specifically addresses Google's outsized control over the Internet and attempts (albeit through flawed reasoning) to level the playing field. 5.) While there was a part in today's session about "recapturing" revenue, no one addressed how publishers can navigate the ever-changing Google Search algorithms and other times when Google decides on a whim to move the goal posts to the detriment of good, original content publishers. I had a direct pipeline to Google today, and felt I had to speak up on behalf of other small and niche publishers who have been just as impacted and who feel they have no voice. Lily Ray 😏 Barry Schwartz John 🧀 ... 🧀 CA News Publishers Association News/Media Alliance Media Guild of the West 🧭 PacificMediaWorkers

Matthew Keys

30,340 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨BIG UPDATE | India has just recorded one of the Biggest FDI investments in its History The Adani–Google Rs.1.25 lakh crore (USD 15 billion) partnership to build a 1 GW AI Data Centre Campus in Visakhapatnam marks a massive leap in India’s technology and investment landscape.
1:44

🚨BIG UPDATE | India has just recorded one of the Biggest FDI investments in its History The Adani–Google Rs.1.25 lakh crore (USD 15 billion) partnership to build a 1 GW AI Data Centre Campus in Visakhapatnam marks a massive leap in India’s technology and investment landscape.

Megh Updates 🚨™

216,407 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

WATCH: Jonathan Sack, software engineer and founder of Faranga, explains how in just 9 months the Rwandan-made fintech has reshaped mobile money payments. Since its 2024 launch, Faranga has processed over Rwf22 billion in transactions—about Rwf158 million daily and Rwf4.7 billion monthly. Today, it stands as Rwanda’s number one downloaded and highest-rated app on both the App Store and Google Play, powering the country’s fast-growing digital economy.
2:49

WATCH: Jonathan Sack, software engineer and founder of Faranga, explains how in just 9 months the Rwandan-made fintech has reshaped mobile money payments. Since its 2024 launch, Faranga has processed over Rwf22 billion in transactions—about Rwf158 million daily and Rwf4.7 billion monthly. Today, it stands as Rwanda’s number one downloaded and highest-rated app on both the App Store and Google Play, powering the country’s fast-growing digital economy.

The New Times (Rwanda)

31,163 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

📁 Sarah Friar, CFO of OpenAI, says AI growth is measured in megawatts. 200 MW turned into 2 billion in revenue. 600 MW into 6 billion. 2 GW into more than 20 billion. The relationship is direct, more compute means more revenue. The real constraint is time. Decisions made today define capacity for 2028, 2029 and 2030. The industry has already moved, global hardware investment jumped by over 220 billion.
1:55

📁 Sarah Friar, CFO of OpenAI, says AI growth is measured in megawatts. 200 MW turned into 2 billion in revenue. 600 MW into 6 billion. 2 GW into more than 20 billion. The relationship is direct, more compute means more revenue. The real constraint is time. Decisions made today define capacity for 2028, 2029 and 2030. The industry has already moved, global hardware investment jumped by over 220 billion.

Jon Hernandez

59,693 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Pet owners are often 'kept in the dark' over bills and prices should be published online, the Competition and Markets Authority says. Martin Coleman, CMA panel inquiry chair, tells #R4Today practices owned by large vet groups charge 16.6% more on average than independent vets.
1:27

Pet owners are often 'kept in the dark' over bills and prices should be published online, the Competition and Markets Authority says. Martin Coleman, CMA panel inquiry chair, tells #R4Today practices owned by large vet groups charge 16.6% more on average than independent vets.

BBC Radio 4 Today

12,057 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 Google introduces Personal Intelligence A new Gemini beta that securely connects Gmail, Photos, YouTube, and Search to deliver a more personalized experience. - Suggest decor using your Google Photos - Plan trips by reasoning over flight and hotel emails - Offer motivation based on your recent activities Privacy first - Off by default - You choose which apps to connect - Can be turned off anytime Rolling out today in the US for Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. More regions coming soon. Video Credit : Google Blog
0:28

🚨 Google introduces Personal Intelligence A new Gemini beta that securely connects Gmail, Photos, YouTube, and Search to deliver a more personalized experience. - Suggest decor using your Google Photos - Plan trips by reasoning over flight and hotel emails - Offer motivation based on your recent activities Privacy first - Off by default - You choose which apps to connect - Can be turned off anytime Rolling out today in the US for Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. More regions coming soon. Video Credit : Google Blog

AshutoshShrivastava

44,393 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Google wrote the paper that made ChatGPT possible. Then decided not to build ChatGPT. Sergey Brin just explained why on stage at Stanford and the reason is more embarrassing than anyone expected. In 2017, Google published the transformer paper. The architecture that powers every major AI model today. It came from their own researchers. Their own labs. Their own compute. Then they sat on it. Sergey was blunt about why. They underinvested in scaling the compute. They did not take it seriously enough. And when they finally had something worth shipping, they got scared. Chatbots say dumb things. Google had a reputation to protect. So they protected it instead of shipping. OpenAI was not scared. Ilya Sutskever, trained at Google, left and went there. Other Google researchers followed. They took the transformer architecture, scaled it, shipped it anyway, and captured the entire generative AI wave while Google watched. Sergey called it a mistake at Stanford in front of hundreds of students. The company that invented the technology did not build the product. The company that built the product did not invent the technology. That is the most expensive case of corporate hesitation in the history of the industry. --- Watch the full interview YT. Search: "Big ideas begin here: Sergey Brin at Stanford"
2:26

Google wrote the paper that made ChatGPT possible. Then decided not to build ChatGPT. Sergey Brin just explained why on stage at Stanford and the reason is more embarrassing than anyone expected. In 2017, Google published the transformer paper. The architecture that powers every major AI model today. It came from their own researchers. Their own labs. Their own compute. Then they sat on it. Sergey was blunt about why. They underinvested in scaling the compute. They did not take it seriously enough. And when they finally had something worth shipping, they got scared. Chatbots say dumb things. Google had a reputation to protect. So they protected it instead of shipping. OpenAI was not scared. Ilya Sutskever, trained at Google, left and went there. Other Google researchers followed. They took the transformer architecture, scaled it, shipped it anyway, and captured the entire generative AI wave while Google watched. Sergey called it a mistake at Stanford in front of hundreds of students. The company that invented the technology did not build the product. The company that built the product did not invent the technology. That is the most expensive case of corporate hesitation in the history of the industry. --- Watch the full interview YT. Search: "Big ideas begin here: Sergey Brin at Stanford"

Ihtesham Ali

244,666 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Google Removes Black History and Pride Months Removed from Calendar App Google has sparked controversy by removing Black History Month and Pride Month from its calendar application, leaving users and activists in disbelief. The decision, which was implemented without prior announcement, has led to a significant backlash on social media platforms. The left is in full meltdown mode over it. H/T X, Breibart, Daily Mail
1:05

Google Removes Black History and Pride Months Removed from Calendar App Google has sparked controversy by removing Black History Month and Pride Month from its calendar application, leaving users and activists in disbelief. The decision, which was implemented without prior announcement, has led to a significant backlash on social media platforms. The left is in full meltdown mode over it. H/T X, Breibart, Daily Mail

MAGA Resource

191,665 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 says South Africa's digital transformation is about more than technology; it's about creating jobs, expanding financial inclusion and building an economy that works for everyone. Addressing the inaugural Google Cloud Summit, the President highlighted how investments in digital public infrastructure and partnerships with industry will help modernise public services, attract investment and unlock opportunities for businesses and young people across the country.
2:58

President Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 says South Africa's digital transformation is about more than technology; it's about creating jobs, expanding financial inclusion and building an economy that works for everyone. Addressing the inaugural Google Cloud Summit, the President highlighted how investments in digital public infrastructure and partnerships with industry will help modernise public services, attract investment and unlock opportunities for businesses and young people across the country.

The Presidency 🇿🇦

40,653 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Google just reported $99 billion in profits it never actually received. Alphabet posted net income of $112.1 billion for a single quarter. Earnings per share came in at $9.11 against a Wall Street estimate of $2.87. That is one of the largest profit quarters any company has ever printed. Yet the stock fell about 7% the same day. When people read past the headline and opened the earnings release, they found the reason sitting in one footnote... $99 billion of that profit came from a line called other income. Alphabet describes it as "primarily the result of net unrealized gains on our equity securities." So Google did not sell anything. It marked up shares it already owned and ran the increase through its income statement. That single line added $77.1 billion to net income after tax. It accounted for $6.26 of the $9.11 in earnings per share. Strip it out and adjusted earnings per share were $2.85. Analysts wanted $2.89. The ACTUAL business missed. Now here is what makes this insane: Most of that $99 billion came from two holdings, SpaceX and Anthropic. SpaceX went public on June 12 at roughly $1.77 trillion, up from about $400 billion a year earlier. Alphabet's stake is worth $94.1 billion, and roughly $80 billion of it sits under sale restrictions. Anthropic went from a $350 billion valuation to $965 billion inside the same quarter. Alphabet's private company holdings were worth about $124.3 billion on June 30, and the vast majority of that is Anthropic. Google cannot sell either position right now. Now trace where that valuation came from: Google started putting money into Anthropic in 2023. A $300 million bet has grown into a $13.3 billion position with commitments of up to $30 billion more. Anthropic committed to buying at least five gigawatts of computing capacity from Google Cloud. Google Cloud revenue then grew 82% to about $24.8 billion, the strongest quarter that business has ever had. That growth is part of the story the market uses to price both companies. And when Anthropic's valuation jumped, Google booked the jump as its OWN profit. Google is the investor, the supplier, and the party deciding what the asset is worth. A tax and accounting consultant named Robert Willens flagged this back in April, pointing out that Alphabet is able to influence the value of one of its own assets. And Alphabet's free cash flow for the quarter was negative $5.9 billion. That is the first negative quarter since Google went public in August 2004. Capital spending hit $44.9 billion. Operating cash flow was $39.1 billion. Capex now eats about 37.5% of every dollar of revenue, the highest share in the company's public life. To fund it, Alphabet has taken on roughly $100 billion of debt this year and raised about $85 billion in a June share sale, its first in more than two decades. This is a company that spent years buying its own stock back. What happens next: Alphabet raised 2026 capital spending guidance to between $195 billion and $205 billion, the second raise in three months. The finance chief told analysts 2027 spending will rise significantly. The company also disclosed $811 billion in contracted future spending commitments as of June, up nearly $500 billion from March. Those commitments are signed contracts that get paid in cash. The profit is an estimate of what a private company might be worth on a given day. Estimates move in both directions. If Anthropic or SpaceX gets repriced downward, the same line that produced the biggest quarter in Google's history runs backwards, and this quarter produced no free cash flow to absorb it. Meta, Microsoft and Amazon are all carrying their own private AI stakes into their own earnings reports. Watch how much of their profit they actually collected in cash...
0:48

Google just reported $99 billion in profits it never actually received. Alphabet posted net income of $112.1 billion for a single quarter. Earnings per share came in at $9.11 against a Wall Street estimate of $2.87. That is one of the largest profit quarters any company has ever printed. Yet the stock fell about 7% the same day. When people read past the headline and opened the earnings release, they found the reason sitting in one footnote... $99 billion of that profit came from a line called other income. Alphabet describes it as "primarily the result of net unrealized gains on our equity securities." So Google did not sell anything. It marked up shares it already owned and ran the increase through its income statement. That single line added $77.1 billion to net income after tax. It accounted for $6.26 of the $9.11 in earnings per share. Strip it out and adjusted earnings per share were $2.85. Analysts wanted $2.89. The ACTUAL business missed. Now here is what makes this insane: Most of that $99 billion came from two holdings, SpaceX and Anthropic. SpaceX went public on June 12 at roughly $1.77 trillion, up from about $400 billion a year earlier. Alphabet's stake is worth $94.1 billion, and roughly $80 billion of it sits under sale restrictions. Anthropic went from a $350 billion valuation to $965 billion inside the same quarter. Alphabet's private company holdings were worth about $124.3 billion on June 30, and the vast majority of that is Anthropic. Google cannot sell either position right now. Now trace where that valuation came from: Google started putting money into Anthropic in 2023. A $300 million bet has grown into a $13.3 billion position with commitments of up to $30 billion more. Anthropic committed to buying at least five gigawatts of computing capacity from Google Cloud. Google Cloud revenue then grew 82% to about $24.8 billion, the strongest quarter that business has ever had. That growth is part of the story the market uses to price both companies. And when Anthropic's valuation jumped, Google booked the jump as its OWN profit. Google is the investor, the supplier, and the party deciding what the asset is worth. A tax and accounting consultant named Robert Willens flagged this back in April, pointing out that Alphabet is able to influence the value of one of its own assets. And Alphabet's free cash flow for the quarter was negative $5.9 billion. That is the first negative quarter since Google went public in August 2004. Capital spending hit $44.9 billion. Operating cash flow was $39.1 billion. Capex now eats about 37.5% of every dollar of revenue, the highest share in the company's public life. To fund it, Alphabet has taken on roughly $100 billion of debt this year and raised about $85 billion in a June share sale, its first in more than two decades. This is a company that spent years buying its own stock back. What happens next: Alphabet raised 2026 capital spending guidance to between $195 billion and $205 billion, the second raise in three months. The finance chief told analysts 2027 spending will rise significantly. The company also disclosed $811 billion in contracted future spending commitments as of June, up nearly $500 billion from March. Those commitments are signed contracts that get paid in cash. The profit is an estimate of what a private company might be worth on a given day. Estimates move in both directions. If Anthropic or SpaceX gets repriced downward, the same line that produced the biggest quarter in Google's history runs backwards, and this quarter produced no free cash flow to absorb it. Meta, Microsoft and Amazon are all carrying their own private AI stakes into their own earnings reports. Watch how much of their profit they actually collected in cash...

Ricardo

363,418 просмотров • 11 дней назад

🚀 Announcing our new loyalty program with Alkimi, the ad platform redefining how brands, publishers, and users interact with Web3. Leveraging the full Sui stack, Alkimi delivers the speed and scalability needed to run real-time ad auctions fully on-chain. Powered by their token, $ALKIMI, the platform brings transparency, efficiency, and trust back into a $750B industry plagued by hidden fees and inefficiencies. 💠 $ALKIMI holders can earn yield right now by staking their tokens on Alkimi Labs: With Alkimi, advertisers launch campaigns that are faster, cheaper, and more effective, while publishers and users benefit directly from a fairer value exchange. This isn’t just an ad platform; it’s the advertising infrastructure layer Web3 has been waiting for. Let’s GiveRep to Alkimi and spread the word about how we’re redefining digital advertising with our new loyalty program.
1:42

🚀 Announcing our new loyalty program with Alkimi, the ad platform redefining how brands, publishers, and users interact with Web3. Leveraging the full Sui stack, Alkimi delivers the speed and scalability needed to run real-time ad auctions fully on-chain. Powered by their token, $ALKIMI, the platform brings transparency, efficiency, and trust back into a $750B industry plagued by hidden fees and inefficiencies. 💠 $ALKIMI holders can earn yield right now by staking their tokens on Alkimi Labs: With Alkimi, advertisers launch campaigns that are faster, cheaper, and more effective, while publishers and users benefit directly from a fairer value exchange. This isn’t just an ad platform; it’s the advertising infrastructure layer Web3 has been waiting for. Let’s GiveRep to Alkimi and spread the word about how we’re redefining digital advertising with our new loyalty program.

GiveRep

40,572 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

From Dorm Room to $4.3 Trillion: How Google Built 8 Billion-User Products. 🇺🇸 Eight different products, each used by more than a billion people every month. One company owns all of them. 🤔 This is the story of how two grad students in a dorm room built the biggest tech empire on the planet. In 1995, Larry Page and Sergey Brin met at Stanford and, by their own account, disagreed about nearly everything. A year later, working out of their dorm rooms, they built a search tool called BackRub that ranked web pages by how many other pages linked to them. They renamed it Google. It went public in 2004, bought YouTube in 2006, and built Android into the world's most-used mobile software. The results are almost hard to believe. Eight separate Google products, including Search, YouTube, Gmail, and Android, each have over a billion monthly users. 😮
2:18

From Dorm Room to $4.3 Trillion: How Google Built 8 Billion-User Products. 🇺🇸 Eight different products, each used by more than a billion people every month. One company owns all of them. 🤔 This is the story of how two grad students in a dorm room built the biggest tech empire on the planet. In 1995, Larry Page and Sergey Brin met at Stanford and, by their own account, disagreed about nearly everything. A year later, working out of their dorm rooms, they built a search tool called BackRub that ranked web pages by how many other pages linked to them. They renamed it Google. It went public in 2004, bought YouTube in 2006, and built Android into the world's most-used mobile software. The results are almost hard to believe. Eight separate Google products, including Search, YouTube, Gmail, and Android, each have over a billion monthly users. 😮

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

45,758 просмотров • 10 дней назад

UPDATE: President Trump announced a Section 301 investigation into the European Union. 🇺🇸🇪🇺 The move follows recent EU enforcement actions against US firms and is part of a broader effort to review the bloc's trade practices. The announcement came after the EU imposed a $890 million penalty on Google, bringing the company's total fines in Europe to more than $18 billion. 🙅‍♂️ President Trump has completely dismantled the predatory regulatory framework that was tolerated during the Biden administration.
0:46

UPDATE: President Trump announced a Section 301 investigation into the European Union. 🇺🇸🇪🇺 The move follows recent EU enforcement actions against US firms and is part of a broader effort to review the bloc's trade practices. The announcement came after the EU imposed a $890 million penalty on Google, bringing the company's total fines in Europe to more than $18 billion. 🙅‍♂️ President Trump has completely dismantled the predatory regulatory framework that was tolerated during the Biden administration.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

114,970 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Introducing Nano Banana 2, our best image model yet 🍌🍌 It uses Gemini’s understanding of the world and is powered by real-time information and images from web search. That means it can better reflect real-world conditions in high-fidelity. Check out "Window Seat," a demo using Nano Banana 2’s world understanding to generate more accurate views from any window in the world, pulling live local weather info with 2K/4K specs. The precision is mind blowing. Rolling out today as the new default in the Google Gemini, Search (across 141 countries), and Flow + available in preview via Google AI Studio and Vertex AI. Also available in Google Google Antigravity.
0:28

Introducing Nano Banana 2, our best image model yet 🍌🍌 It uses Gemini’s understanding of the world and is powered by real-time information and images from web search. That means it can better reflect real-world conditions in high-fidelity. Check out "Window Seat," a demo using Nano Banana 2’s world understanding to generate more accurate views from any window in the world, pulling live local weather info with 2K/4K specs. The precision is mind blowing. Rolling out today as the new default in the Google Gemini, Search (across 141 countries), and Flow + available in preview via Google AI Studio and Vertex AI. Also available in Google Google Antigravity.

Sundar Pichai

922,632 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад