Today we’re asking those with sensitive information on global instability, international terrorism or hostile state intelligence activity to contact MI6 securely online. Our virtual door is open to you.

I wonder if Zarah Sultana & Jeremy Corbyn can use this service to submit their grievances. 😁😂

@Sandbagger_01 Shits kicking off around Venezuela. FYI.

can i report you? you’re a menace to global security and in my opinion traitorous to the British people who you put in danger with your antics

I could not trust any grown up in such an important position with sensitive information who has pronouns in his bio. Do you have contact details for the Slow Horses?

@YvetteCooperMP Here’s some ‘sensitive information on (UK) instability’. 😎At least 800 undocumented illegal aliens broke into the UK today…Oh no, they were helped by UK Border Security to break into the UK! Surely this can’t be true?

Maybe recognising a terrorist state is a bad move.

@YvetteCooperMP Sounds like you’re losing control of this invasion as well as our incompetent government.

@YvetteCooperMP Another 800 unchecked unverified migrants arriving today for you to keep an eye on. Maybe a change of government might be the answer, this one sure is the most incompetent we have ever witnessed.

@YvetteCooperMP "Hello, Mi6?" "We currently have an instable and tyrannical government in charge allowing the deaths and torture of millions of British citizens." "Can you help?"

Nice one. I hope that yours and all government departments especially those on Red, have upgraded all their Microsoft systems to the support able versions. With Windows 10 being end of life come oct15 you need to ensure security provision is in place on those DII machines.

Yes hi I have information on a certain middle Eastern country that is causing instability throughout the west...

It won’t be long before it gets hacked - nothing online is totally secure these days. You have just gone to the top of the hackers list!

@BenWallace70 Fuck you

here's a tip for you: nigel farage

@YvetteCooperMP Labour Friends of Israel would be a good start. They’ve bought our government and support a terrorist regime.

I mer Hemming's at the Special Forces Club in Knightsbridge when his book came out some years ago. ### Summary of the Zimmermann Telegram (1917) The Zimmermann Telegram was a secret diplomatic dispatch sent by German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmermann on January 16, 1917, to the German ambassador in Mexico. It proposed a military alliance: if the United States entered World War I against Germany, Mexico would attack the U.S. in exchange for regaining lost territories (Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona), with Germany providing financial support and encouraging Mexico to ally with Japan. The telegram was transmitted via U.S. cables (as Germany's were cut) but intercepted and decrypted by British intelligence in Room 40. To avoid revealing their codebreaking, the British delayed release and verified authenticity before handing a copy to the U.S. on February 24, 1917. Zimmermann admitted its validity on March 3, sparking outrage amid Germany's submarine warfare. This shifted U.S. public opinion, leading President Woodrow Wilson to request war on April 2, with Congress declaring it on April 6. ### Summary of the Story in *Our Man in New York* (1940–1941) Henry Hemming's *Our Man in New York: The British Plot to Bring America into the Second World War* details the covert operations of British Security Coordination (BSC), MI6's New York-based propaganda and influence arm, led by William Stephenson (codename "Intrepid"), a Canadian-born WWI pilot and Winston Churchill ally. Facing U.S. isolationism (e.g., only 7% supported war in May 1940 per Gallup polls), Stephenson's team ran a massive disinformation campaign from 1940 to 1941 to manipulate public opinion and pressure Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) toward war against Nazi Germany. Key tactics included planting over 20 fake news stories weekly in U.S. media (e.g., a fabricated 1941 British raid on Nazi-occupied France to show the war was winnable), infiltrating anti-war groups like America First (organizing violent protests, such as the April 1941 New York clash), and forging documents. A pivotal "trick" involved a fake map, distributed in October 1941, purporting to show Hitler's plans to conquer South America—funneled through Stephenson's ally, William "Wild Bill" Donovan. Donovan, a WWI hero and FDR confidant, had been courted by Stephenson and appointed head of the new Office of the Coordinator of Information (COI, OSS precursor) in July 1941. Much of the COI's intelligence came from MI6, giving Stephenson backdoor access to FDR. The president referenced the map in an October 27 fireside chat, stoking fears and shifting polls: by November 1941, most Americans favored war. After Pearl Harbor (December 7), Hitler—alarmed by the map and U.S. actions—declared war on the U.S. on December 11, drawing America fully in. ### Comparison Both stories highlight British intelligence's role in engineering U.S. entry into world wars against Germany through information manipulation, but they differ in authenticity, scale, and methods. Below is a structured comparison: | Aspect | Zimmermann Telegram (WWI, 1917) | BSC Operation in *Our Man in New York* (WWII, 1940–1941) | | **Historical Context** | U.S. neutrality strained by German U-boat attacks; Britain desperate for U.S. aid as war stalemated. | U.S. isolationism dominant (e.g., America First movement); Britain alone after France's fall, facing Nazi threat. | | **Core Deception** | Interception and leak of a *genuine* German plot to ally with Mexico against the U.S., framing Germany as aggressor. | Creation and dissemination of *fabricated* intelligence (e.g., fake South America map) to portray Germany as an imminent hemispheric threat. | | **Method of Influence** | Targeted diplomatic leak to U.S. government/media for outrage; delayed release to protect codebreaking secrets. | Broad propaganda war: fake news in press, funded protests, infiltration of groups; used Donovan as intelligence conduit to FDR for "plausible deniability." | | **Key Figures** | - Arthur Zimmermann (sender)<br>- British: Room 40 cryptographers (e.g., Alfred Ewing)<br>- U.S.: Woodrow Wilson, Walter Hines Page (ambassador who received leak). | - William Stephenson ("Intrepid," BSC head)<br>- William "Wild Bill" Donovan (COI/OSS head, FDR friend)<br>- U.S./UK: FDR, Winston Churchill (backing Stephenson). | | **Role of Friendship/Access** | No personal ties emphasized; relied on formal channels and public scandal. | Central: Stephenson exploited Donovan's rapport with FDR to feed MI6 intel directly into White House, bypassing isolationists. | | **Scale and Tools** | Single document; focused on elite/government reaction. | Massive: 2,300+ agents, Rockefeller Center HQ, weekly fake stories, forged docs; targeted public opinion via media/protests. | | **Timeline to Impact** | Leak (Feb 1917) → Admission (Mar) → War declaration (Apr 6, 1917). | Fake map (Oct 1941) → FDR speech → Opinion shift (Nov) → Hitler's declaration (Dec 11, 1941) post-Pearl Harbor. | | **Outcome and Legacy** | Directly catalyzed U.S. war entry; seen as intelligence triumph but ethically debated for manipulation. | Indirectly provoked Hitler's war declaration; built U.S.-UK intel alliance (e.g., OSS-CIA roots); viewed as audacious psyops but risked backlash if exposed. | ### Key Similarities and Differences **Similarities**: In both cases, Britain wielded information as a weapon to overcome U.S. reluctance, exploiting German actions (real or provoked) to manufacture consent for war. Each operation hinged on credible leaks to FDR/Wilson, amplified by media, and proved pivotal—tipping isolated America into Allied commitment. They underscore MI6's asymmetric strategy: using deception to align a superpower without direct confrontation. **Differences**: The Zimmermann plot leveraged *authentic* enemy folly for moral outrage, making it a "smoking gun," whereas the BSC's campaign was pure invention, risking exposure in a freer press era. WWI's focus was surgical (one telegram), while WWII's was a sprawling psyops orchestra, leveraging personal networks like Donovan-FDR. Ethically, the former feels more "defensive," the latter more aggressive provocation. Overall, these tales reveal a pattern in Anglo-American history: British spycraft as the midwife of U.S. global involvement, blending ingenuity with controversy. Hemming's book portrays the 1941 effort as bolder, almost cinematic, but both remind us how fragile neutrality can be when facts are forged.

See most recent (multi-language) videos for portal access. 🇬🇧

Here’s an idea, try stopping people coming across the channel and get MI5 to investigate British no-go communities. That would be a good start in stopping international threats. Because it’s already here under your watch!!!

@_JakubJanda theres a problem with democracy here in the US.

The social shaping of technology is relevant to a cheap electric car of the people like the Volkswagen beetle as opposed to Tesla cars which need a mortgage and mass transit is very Stalinist. Morality is an issue. Human rights/Geneva Conventions is moral v Stalinist brutality

Is that the same as your backdoor into people's private secure messaging?

Can you take your pronouns out of your bio please? You're meant to be impartial, not a gender cult activist.

@BenWallace70 There apparently is an Israeli infiltration of the Labour party. A number of MPs have been coordinating with Israeli war criminals both in Israel and the UK. Worth checking don't you think?

@YvetteCooperMP Hostile 👇🏼

Im working for our country British intelligence [email protected] [email protected] Gaikwad, Vishal &lt;[email protected]&gt;Fulthorpe, Michael &lt;[email protected]&gt; Im working 💪 👷‍♂️ 💪 👷‍♀️ for us

That should do the trick!

Teach us how to break those global new systems, and we should train AI to do so. Elizabeth and John Dee networks broke the old Roman dogma by renovating the intelligence system globally, where MI6 traces its roots back, as well as many other modernised intel networks. I think we need to do something similar: to make psyop approachable to commoners who think, have self moral control, and use data responsibly. It’s also a good way to have a deep cleaning globally on under-carpet roaches who abuse data surveillance hierarchy for unjustified purposes, either it is governmental or individual units.

Muslim Brotherhood would be a good start. All the Labour/Conservative MPs who are members of Friends of [foreign State] would be another. Unvetted illegal migrants another.

Can I report that Europe is funding wars in Europe by buying Russian gas and oil?

There's a fella who hangs out in a house on Downing Street who is source of instability. Perhaps you could send 007 round for a cuppa and a little chat? 🙂

On a global scale Russia china India Mali North Korea all have/want homogeneous racial states. Heterogeneous states like Britain are the enemy! The strategy is Stalinist to have economic states with only one race who work together harmoniously as part of a greater whole alliance.

@BenWallace70 Investigate the WHO, the WEF, GAVI, SAGE, Public Health England, The London School of Tropical Medicine, Pfizer etc etc

Terrorism is caused by the greedy rich. Start there.