Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Tokenization could cut errors and admin costs, but instant settlement can tie up more capital "Tokenization is a terrible word for a potentially enormous idea. In this context, it means representing an asset or a claim on an asset as a digital token recorded on a blockchain." "What changes...

scottmelker's profile picture

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,083,869 subscribers

17,927 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

FinanzenWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Wolf Of All Streets
The Wolf Of All Streetsvor 15 Tagen

This clip is brought to you by @hodlwithLedn

Profilbild von Yeo
Yeovor 15 Tagen

Underrated point. T+2 lets dealers net trades across the day, atomic settlement means every trade has to be prefunded. Tokenization wins first where speed is worth more than the capital it locks up... collateral and repo, not retail stock trading.

Profilbild von BRIXES
BRIXESvor 15 Tagen

the real breakthrough is making the whole system work seamlessly

Profilbild von timepowerseverything
timepowerseverythingvor 15 Tagen

#ccip

Profilbild von Sarah Jenkins
Sarah Jenkinsvor 15 Tagen

Tokenization being called a terrible word for an enormous idea is spot on. Instant settlement tying up less capital is a massive efficiency win for the whole system. @kenmartinboston always says the terminology changes but the utility is what matters.

Ähnliche Videos

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink believes tokenization is inevitable and that one common blockchain is the future. Context matters. BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager and has been tasked with advising on Ukraine’s post-war state assets, underscoring the depth of its institutional and political reach. After this interview went viral, much of the crypto communit, particularly on X and YouTube, pointed to #Ethereum as the natural default implied by Larry Fink’s remarks: a system where all investments are tokenized and capital can move seamlessly across asset classes. Importantly, BlackRock’s flagship tokenized fund, BUIDL (BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund), is built on Ethereum, via partners such as Securitize. In practice, this shows how BlackRock is already implementing the “one common blockchain” vision articulated by Larry Fink, positioning Ethereum as the leading institution-grade infrastructure for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization today. Here’s what Larry Fink said, “I think the movement towards tokenization and digitization is necessary. We need to move very rapidly to doing that. We would be reducing fees and increasing democratization if all investments were on a tokenized platform. Capital could move seamlessly from money market funds to equities and bonds, back and forth. If we had one common blockchain, we could reduce corruption.”
0:54

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink believes tokenization is inevitable and that one common blockchain is the future. Context matters. BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager and has been tasked with advising on Ukraine’s post-war state assets, underscoring the depth of its institutional and political reach. After this interview went viral, much of the crypto communit, particularly on X and YouTube, pointed to #Ethereum as the natural default implied by Larry Fink’s remarks: a system where all investments are tokenized and capital can move seamlessly across asset classes. Importantly, BlackRock’s flagship tokenized fund, BUIDL (BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund), is built on Ethereum, via partners such as Securitize. In practice, this shows how BlackRock is already implementing the “one common blockchain” vision articulated by Larry Fink, positioning Ethereum as the leading institution-grade infrastructure for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization today. Here’s what Larry Fink said, “I think the movement towards tokenization and digitization is necessary. We need to move very rapidly to doing that. We would be reducing fees and increasing democratization if all investments were on a tokenized platform. Capital could move seamlessly from money market funds to equities and bonds, back and forth. If we had one common blockchain, we could reduce corruption.”

Garrett

84,799 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Tokenization as Infrastructure, Not a Shortcut In this clip, André Casterman explains why tokenization is best understood as an upgrade to the internet’s financial infrastructure, not a guarantee of liquidity or success. Tokenization does not create demand on its own. Liquidity still matters. What it does change is the efficiency of how value moves. Cheaper settlement. Faster transfer. Native verifiability. Stablecoins are a clear example. Instead of routing payments through correspondent banking and local clearing entities, value can move directly by transferring tokens. The asset does not need to be physically moved or reconciled across jurisdictions. The result is lower cost and less friction. Verifiability is the real unlock. Unlike physical assets, which require costly and invasive processes to prove authenticity, tokenized assets can be verified on-chain, publicly, and without altering the asset itself. This is the shift from moving information to moving value. Tokenization is not a product. It is infrastructure. And infrastructure is what enables real-world use at scale. — André Casterman
3:32

Tokenization as Infrastructure, Not a Shortcut In this clip, André Casterman explains why tokenization is best understood as an upgrade to the internet’s financial infrastructure, not a guarantee of liquidity or success. Tokenization does not create demand on its own. Liquidity still matters. What it does change is the efficiency of how value moves. Cheaper settlement. Faster transfer. Native verifiability. Stablecoins are a clear example. Instead of routing payments through correspondent banking and local clearing entities, value can move directly by transferring tokens. The asset does not need to be physically moved or reconciled across jurisdictions. The result is lower cost and less friction. Verifiability is the real unlock. Unlike physical assets, which require costly and invasive processes to prove authenticity, tokenized assets can be verified on-chain, publicly, and without altering the asset itself. This is the shift from moving information to moving value. Tokenization is not a product. It is infrastructure. And infrastructure is what enables real-world use at scale. — André Casterman

XDC Foundation

14,627 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A token is easy to create. Building an actual market around it is where things get interesting. Chill,let me introduce Fusi.ng to you because crypto has made launching tokens incredibly accessible. You can come up with a name, ticker, supply and contract, and suddenly you have an asset sitting on-chain. But creating the asset is only one part of the equation. » What gives it a market? » Where does liquidity come from? » What can people trade it against? » How does the market continue working after launch? » And what happens to the economics when people actually start trading? This is the area Fusi.ng is exploring. Fusing is building an open market layer on Ethereum that brings creation, liquidity and trading together. But the most interesting part isn't simply that you can launch another token. It's what you can actually turn into a market. A meme. A creator. A community. A brand. An internet idea. Something that already has people gathered around it can potentially become an on-chain asset with a market attached. So instead of starting with: “Which token should I launch?” There's a more interesting question: “What can I fuse?” Stay with me 👇🧵
1:14

A token is easy to create. Building an actual market around it is where things get interesting. Chill,let me introduce Fusi.ng to you because crypto has made launching tokens incredibly accessible. You can come up with a name, ticker, supply and contract, and suddenly you have an asset sitting on-chain. But creating the asset is only one part of the equation. » What gives it a market? » Where does liquidity come from? » What can people trade it against? » How does the market continue working after launch? » And what happens to the economics when people actually start trading? This is the area Fusi.ng is exploring. Fusing is building an open market layer on Ethereum that brings creation, liquidity and trading together. But the most interesting part isn't simply that you can launch another token. It's what you can actually turn into a market. A meme. A creator. A community. A brand. An internet idea. Something that already has people gathered around it can potentially become an on-chain asset with a market attached. So instead of starting with: “Which token should I launch?” There's a more interesting question: “What can I fuse?” Stay with me 👇🧵

HaybitX

44,705 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

DTCC is leading the adoption of the new financial system, and I’m getting even more bullish on $XLM, $XRP, $HBAR and $QNT. Understand what’s happening here. DTCC isn’t building tokenization around one chain or one form of digital cash. It wants institutions to choose how assets settle: Stablecoins. Tokenized deposits. Another tokenized asset. Even asset-for-asset settlement. That changes the game. DTCC’s depository subsidiary already custodies more than $114 trillion in assets, and its Tokenization Service is moving toward stocks, ETFs and U.S. Treasuries becoming programmable across multiple blockchain networks. Now look at the infrastructure already lining up around that future. $XLM This one has the direct connection. DTCC officially selected Stellar for its Tokenization Service, with DTC-tokenized assets expected on Stellar in the first half of 2027. Stellar already has stablecoins, native asset issuance, a DEX, liquidity pools and path payments. That means tokenized assets can potentially move directly against digital money instead of sitting idle. $XRP XRPL brings another piece: liquidity. CSD BR is already using XRPL with regulated BTG Pactual fund shares. And XRPL’s auto-bridging can route: Asset A → XRP → Asset B when XRP provides the better liquidity path. The more tokenized assets exist, the more valuable that becomes. $HBAR Hedera already has regulated tokenized funds, government securities, institutional collateral movements and stablecoin cash flows through Archax, Lloyds and Aberdeen. Real assets are already being used as working capital. $QNT Then comes the money layer. The Clearing House selected Quant to power interoperability and orchestration for U.S. tokenized bank deposits connected to RTP and CHIPS. So DTCC builds the digital assets. Banks build digital money. Quant connects the money. Stellar distributes assets. XRPL provides liquidity. Hedera handles institutional tokenization and collateral. I think we are watching separate pieces of the same financial machine being assembled. And it’s happening much FASTER NOW!
0:24

DTCC is leading the adoption of the new financial system, and I’m getting even more bullish on $XLM, $XRP, $HBAR and $QNT. Understand what’s happening here. DTCC isn’t building tokenization around one chain or one form of digital cash. It wants institutions to choose how assets settle: Stablecoins. Tokenized deposits. Another tokenized asset. Even asset-for-asset settlement. That changes the game. DTCC’s depository subsidiary already custodies more than $114 trillion in assets, and its Tokenization Service is moving toward stocks, ETFs and U.S. Treasuries becoming programmable across multiple blockchain networks. Now look at the infrastructure already lining up around that future. $XLM This one has the direct connection. DTCC officially selected Stellar for its Tokenization Service, with DTC-tokenized assets expected on Stellar in the first half of 2027. Stellar already has stablecoins, native asset issuance, a DEX, liquidity pools and path payments. That means tokenized assets can potentially move directly against digital money instead of sitting idle. $XRP XRPL brings another piece: liquidity. CSD BR is already using XRPL with regulated BTG Pactual fund shares. And XRPL’s auto-bridging can route: Asset A → XRP → Asset B when XRP provides the better liquidity path. The more tokenized assets exist, the more valuable that becomes. $HBAR Hedera already has regulated tokenized funds, government securities, institutional collateral movements and stablecoin cash flows through Archax, Lloyds and Aberdeen. Real assets are already being used as working capital. $QNT Then comes the money layer. The Clearing House selected Quant to power interoperability and orchestration for U.S. tokenized bank deposits connected to RTP and CHIPS. So DTCC builds the digital assets. Banks build digital money. Quant connects the money. Stellar distributes assets. XRPL provides liquidity. Hedera handles institutional tokenization and collateral. I think we are watching separate pieces of the same financial machine being assembled. And it’s happening much FASTER NOW!

X Finance Bull

64,723 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

🚨🤯 A New Financial System Is Being Built On Blockchain For China, Russia and the U.S. To Trade Directly Russian FM Lavrov just confessed that they need an independent cross-border system that is not controlled by any party and can also absorb external shocks, which the “dollar system” is significantly failing at. He also added that Russia and China were never against trade with the U.S. but the Dollar and SWIFT system were weaponized against them. China, Russia, India, Middle East partners, Japan, and beyond are actively exploring deeper financial integration: a neutral, decentralized system powered by blockchain technology, that can trade oil and commerce without any restrictions. They said, “Stablecoins will not be used.” Why? Recent events highlight the risks: Over $1B in USDT was frozen due to alleged Iran, Russia and China links, showing even stablecoins can face sudden restrictions. BRICS nations are seeking a truly neutral settlement asset, one that can connect economies East and West without single-point control. Meanwhile, China just approved fresh trades with the U.S. Russia has stated it has no issue trading with America. Everyone wants commerce to flow but history shows payment rails can become tools in geopolitical tensions. What BRICS said: A multipolar, blockchain-enabled neutral infrastructure could be the bridge that binds global trade in the 21st century. The pieces are moving. The future of settlement is being written in code. What truly decentralized asset or blockchain comes to your mind?👇
0:52

🚨🤯 A New Financial System Is Being Built On Blockchain For China, Russia and the U.S. To Trade Directly Russian FM Lavrov just confessed that they need an independent cross-border system that is not controlled by any party and can also absorb external shocks, which the “dollar system” is significantly failing at. He also added that Russia and China were never against trade with the U.S. but the Dollar and SWIFT system were weaponized against them. China, Russia, India, Middle East partners, Japan, and beyond are actively exploring deeper financial integration: a neutral, decentralized system powered by blockchain technology, that can trade oil and commerce without any restrictions. They said, “Stablecoins will not be used.” Why? Recent events highlight the risks: Over $1B in USDT was frozen due to alleged Iran, Russia and China links, showing even stablecoins can face sudden restrictions. BRICS nations are seeking a truly neutral settlement asset, one that can connect economies East and West without single-point control. Meanwhile, China just approved fresh trades with the U.S. Russia has stated it has no issue trading with America. Everyone wants commerce to flow but history shows payment rails can become tools in geopolitical tensions. What BRICS said: A multipolar, blockchain-enabled neutral infrastructure could be the bridge that binds global trade in the 21st century. The pieces are moving. The future of settlement is being written in code. What truly decentralized asset or blockchain comes to your mind?👇

Stellar Rippler🚀

619,763 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Whether you call it a lifestyle or a lifestyle in the making, the issue is the same. Traffic is a problem, not a culture. Time wasted in traffic is time stolen from family, work, and opportunity. Lagosians aren’t looking for a better explanation of traffic - we’re looking for a way out of it. One way to do that is to reduce the number of cars on our roads by encouraging , incentivizing and securing ride sharing, incorporating cycle lanes on our road network and implementing effective and punctual Bus, Train and ferry services. My commitment to every Lagosian is to deliver a city where commuting is seamless, efficient and affordable. A Lagos where getting to work doesn’t feel like a second job. A truly integrated transport system where road, rail and waterways work together to move people faster, more efficiently and at a cost people can afford. A vote for GRV is a vote for a liveable and productive lifestyle.A vote for GRV is a Vote for positive impact that you can feel. Vote GRV. #ourlagos Make Eko Great Again #gbadegbada
1:25

Whether you call it a lifestyle or a lifestyle in the making, the issue is the same. Traffic is a problem, not a culture. Time wasted in traffic is time stolen from family, work, and opportunity. Lagosians aren’t looking for a better explanation of traffic - we’re looking for a way out of it. One way to do that is to reduce the number of cars on our roads by encouraging , incentivizing and securing ride sharing, incorporating cycle lanes on our road network and implementing effective and punctual Bus, Train and ferry services. My commitment to every Lagosian is to deliver a city where commuting is seamless, efficient and affordable. A Lagos where getting to work doesn’t feel like a second job. A truly integrated transport system where road, rail and waterways work together to move people faster, more efficiently and at a cost people can afford. A vote for GRV is a vote for a liveable and productive lifestyle.A vote for GRV is a Vote for positive impact that you can feel. Vote GRV. #ourlagos Make Eko Great Again #gbadegbada

Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour

23,091 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

𝑬𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝑻𝑲𝑵: 𝑾𝒉𝒚 𝑫𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑶𝒘𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 𝑴𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒆 Imagine entering a virtual world where you don't just look around. You have your own avatar. You can own digital items, explore different places, interact with people, build something of your own. That the things you collect and build can have ownership recorded on a blockchain. That is where Evolve Pro ecosystem become interesting. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑫𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝑫𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑶𝒘𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 𝑴𝒆𝒂𝒏? In many traditional games, you can buy or earn digital items, The platform still controls them. Blockchain offers a different approach. It can record ownership of digital assets in a verifiable way. NFTs can represent unique assets such as virtual land, vehicles, avatars and collectibles. The important thing isn't simply owning an NFT. The question is what you can do with it. ✦ 𝑽𝒊𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝑳𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒂𝒏 𝑩𝒆 𝑴𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝑻𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒆 Imagine having your own piece of land inside the EVOP Metaverse. You could potentially use it as a personal space, shop, meeting place or another digital experience. Instead of simply visiting a virtual world, users can potentially help shape it. ✦ 𝑨𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒔 𝑪𝒂𝒏 𝑩𝒆 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒀𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑫𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑰𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒚 Your avatar can be more than just a character. You can customize it with clothes, accessories and digital items that represent your style and progress. As the metaverse grows, digital identity can become an important part of how people interact online. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝑫𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝑬𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝑻𝑲𝑵 𝑭𝒊𝒕 𝑰𝒏? Evolve Pro is exploring how virtual worlds, digital assets, blockchain, NFTs and community participation can work together. The aim is to create an ecosystem where users have different ways to explore, interact and participate. ✦ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒐𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 $𝑬𝑽𝑶𝑷 $EVOP is the token connected to the EVOP ecosystem. It can potentially connect different products and experiences. Depending on the features developed, it could be used for transactions, rewards, access and other utilities. The key point is utility. A token becomes more meaningful when people have real reasons to use it. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑪𝒂𝒏 𝑼𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝑫𝒐? Inside an expanding ecosystem, users can potentially: ➠ Explore different virtual worlds ➠ Customize their avatars ➠ Discover digital assets ➠ Own or develop virtual land ➠ Interact with other users ➠ Complete missions and activities collect NFTs ➠ Use digital assets with different utilities ➠ Potentially earn through supported ecosystem activities This gives users more ways to participate instead of simply visiting. ✦ 𝑯𝒐𝒘 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑷𝒊𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝑭𝒊𝒕 𝑻𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 Think of the EVOP ecosystem as different pieces working together. The Metaverse gives users a world to explore. Blockchain provides the technology for recording ownership. NFTs can represent unique digital assets. Virtual land can give users places to build. Avatars and vehicles can make the experience more personal. $EVOP can potentially connect different utilities across the ecosystem. Together, these pieces create a more connected digital experience. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒚 𝑫𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝑴𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓? People are spending more time online, making digital ownership an important conversation. EvolveTKN is exploring how people can have more meaningful roles inside digital environments. Instead of only consuming an experience, users can potentially own, build, interact and participate. That is what makes the EVOP Metaverse worth watching. ✦ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑩𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒆𝒓 𝑰𝒅𝒆𝒂 The metaverse is still developing, and virtual worlds are becoming more connected with blockchain technology and digital assets. EvolveTKN is exploring this space by bringing together the metaverse, NFTs, digital ownership and EVOP utility. The goal is to create an ecosystem where people can explore, own, build and participate. Sign up
1:00

𝑬𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝑻𝑲𝑵: 𝑾𝒉𝒚 𝑫𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑶𝒘𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 𝑴𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒆 Imagine entering a virtual world where you don't just look around. You have your own avatar. You can own digital items, explore different places, interact with people, build something of your own. That the things you collect and build can have ownership recorded on a blockchain. That is where Evolve Pro ecosystem become interesting. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑫𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝑫𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑶𝒘𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 𝑴𝒆𝒂𝒏? In many traditional games, you can buy or earn digital items, The platform still controls them. Blockchain offers a different approach. It can record ownership of digital assets in a verifiable way. NFTs can represent unique assets such as virtual land, vehicles, avatars and collectibles. The important thing isn't simply owning an NFT. The question is what you can do with it. ✦ 𝑽𝒊𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝑳𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒂𝒏 𝑩𝒆 𝑴𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝑻𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒆 Imagine having your own piece of land inside the EVOP Metaverse. You could potentially use it as a personal space, shop, meeting place or another digital experience. Instead of simply visiting a virtual world, users can potentially help shape it. ✦ 𝑨𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒔 𝑪𝒂𝒏 𝑩𝒆 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒀𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑫𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑰𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒚 Your avatar can be more than just a character. You can customize it with clothes, accessories and digital items that represent your style and progress. As the metaverse grows, digital identity can become an important part of how people interact online. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝑫𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝑬𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝑻𝑲𝑵 𝑭𝒊𝒕 𝑰𝒏? Evolve Pro is exploring how virtual worlds, digital assets, blockchain, NFTs and community participation can work together. The aim is to create an ecosystem where users have different ways to explore, interact and participate. ✦ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒐𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 $𝑬𝑽𝑶𝑷 $EVOP is the token connected to the EVOP ecosystem. It can potentially connect different products and experiences. Depending on the features developed, it could be used for transactions, rewards, access and other utilities. The key point is utility. A token becomes more meaningful when people have real reasons to use it. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑪𝒂𝒏 𝑼𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝑫𝒐? Inside an expanding ecosystem, users can potentially: ➠ Explore different virtual worlds ➠ Customize their avatars ➠ Discover digital assets ➠ Own or develop virtual land ➠ Interact with other users ➠ Complete missions and activities collect NFTs ➠ Use digital assets with different utilities ➠ Potentially earn through supported ecosystem activities This gives users more ways to participate instead of simply visiting. ✦ 𝑯𝒐𝒘 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑷𝒊𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝑭𝒊𝒕 𝑻𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 Think of the EVOP ecosystem as different pieces working together. The Metaverse gives users a world to explore. Blockchain provides the technology for recording ownership. NFTs can represent unique digital assets. Virtual land can give users places to build. Avatars and vehicles can make the experience more personal. $EVOP can potentially connect different utilities across the ecosystem. Together, these pieces create a more connected digital experience. ✦ 𝑾𝒉𝒚 𝑫𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝑴𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓? People are spending more time online, making digital ownership an important conversation. EvolveTKN is exploring how people can have more meaningful roles inside digital environments. Instead of only consuming an experience, users can potentially own, build, interact and participate. That is what makes the EVOP Metaverse worth watching. ✦ 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑩𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒆𝒓 𝑰𝒅𝒆𝒂 The metaverse is still developing, and virtual worlds are becoming more connected with blockchain technology and digital assets. EvolveTKN is exploring this space by bringing together the metaverse, NFTs, digital ownership and EVOP utility. The goal is to create an ecosystem where people can explore, own, build and participate. Sign up

𝐃𝐞𝐅𝐢𝐆𝐮𝐫𝐮

11,371 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

XRP is the native digital asset of the $XRP Ledger a public, decentralized network. It does not use mining. Independent validators reach agreement, the ledger closes in 3–5 seconds, and settlement is final. 100 billion #XRP were created at genesis. No more can be issued. $XRP is the asset. Ripple is a company. The ledger is public. To learn more on how $XRP How it Functions :
1:39

XRP is the native digital asset of the $XRP Ledger a public, decentralized network. It does not use mining. Independent validators reach agreement, the ledger closes in 3–5 seconds, and settlement is final. 100 billion #XRP were created at genesis. No more can be issued. $XRP is the asset. Ripple is a company. The ledger is public. To learn more on how $XRP How it Functions :

𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP

21,149 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Tokenization makes real-world assets easier to access, but it can also make the asset itself harder to investigate. Once a stock, commodity or ETF becomes a token, the token is usually what you see first. But behind it are questions that matter just as much: What exactly does it represent, who issued it, and what other representations of the same asset exist? That is the idea behind UnderScope. Instead of starting with a token and working backwards, UnderScope starts with the real-world asset and traces the relationships around it from the underlier, To its issuers, to the tokenized representations, and finally to the market data. Take Gold. Rather than looking at one tokenized version in isolation, UnderScope lets you investigate the different wrappers connected to the same underlying and compare how they are behaving in the market. That is where the UnderScope Lens comes in. It compares tokenized representations against the market reference and surfaces things like price proximity, Volume and wrapper dispersion, giving you more context than a token page alone. We also made the API evidence visible. You can see the CMC RWA endpoints powering the investigation, along with their response status, latency and timestamps. Because when you’re investigating a tokenized asset, the interesting question isn’t only “what is this token?” It’s “what is actually behind it?” We built UnderScope to make that question easier to answer. I dropped a short demo video below so you can see how the investigation works in practice. And if you’d like to explore UnderScope yourself, you can check out the live version here: The full build is also available on GitHub: #BuildwithCMC
0:45

Tokenization makes real-world assets easier to access, but it can also make the asset itself harder to investigate. Once a stock, commodity or ETF becomes a token, the token is usually what you see first. But behind it are questions that matter just as much: What exactly does it represent, who issued it, and what other representations of the same asset exist? That is the idea behind UnderScope. Instead of starting with a token and working backwards, UnderScope starts with the real-world asset and traces the relationships around it from the underlier, To its issuers, to the tokenized representations, and finally to the market data. Take Gold. Rather than looking at one tokenized version in isolation, UnderScope lets you investigate the different wrappers connected to the same underlying and compare how they are behaving in the market. That is where the UnderScope Lens comes in. It compares tokenized representations against the market reference and surfaces things like price proximity, Volume and wrapper dispersion, giving you more context than a token page alone. We also made the API evidence visible. You can see the CMC RWA endpoints powering the investigation, along with their response status, latency and timestamps. Because when you’re investigating a tokenized asset, the interesting question isn’t only “what is this token?” It’s “what is actually behind it?” We built UnderScope to make that question easier to answer. I dropped a short demo video below so you can see how the investigation works in practice. And if you’d like to explore UnderScope yourself, you can check out the live version here: The full build is also available on GitHub: #BuildwithCMC

Pinnacle Crypt 💎🥷🦾

25,869 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Nvidia’s CTO just explained why $NBIS stands out from every other neocloud. A normal cloud and an AI factory are not the same thing. A traditional cloud is built for flexible, general purpose computing. An AI factory has to make the GPUs, CPUs, storage, networking and software work together like one giant system. That is basically what Nebius is building. Nebius VP of Product Narek T. says customers are choosing the platform mainly because of reliability and performance. Having the newest Nvidia GPUs is nice but at this scale that is not enough. Customers care about how efficiently thousands of GPUs work together and, more importantly, what happens when something breaks and something will break. When you are running thousands of GPUs, hardware failures are inevitable. Nebius says its platform can automatically detect and replace unhealthy nodes in roughly 12 to 15 minutes while protecting the workload. Manually, that process can take hours. That matters because an AI lab does not want a massive training run getting interrupted every time one server fails. Nebius is also getting extremely early access to Nvidia’s newest systems. It was the first cloud provider in Europe to put GB300 NVL72 into production and the first globally to connect it with 800 Gbps Quantum X800 InfiniBand. Each GB300 NVL72 rack combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs into one liquid cooled system, with NVLink essentially making the rack behave like one enormous GPU. Nebius can then connect multiple racks together for even larger training and reasoning workloads. And they are already preparing for Vera Rubin.mThis is where the story gets more interesting to me. Nebius does not want to just rent GPUs by the hour forever. The company is also building serverless inference products where customers pay for actually running models and producing tokens and that could be a MUCH better business. Nvidia recently said Nebius software optimizations increased token throughput on the same GB300 hardware by as much as 2.7x in six months, while reducing cost per token by more than 60%.. That means Nebius can generate more tokens, more revenue and better economics from the same amount of data center power. Extremely bullish on $NBIS
3:45

Nvidia’s CTO just explained why $NBIS stands out from every other neocloud. A normal cloud and an AI factory are not the same thing. A traditional cloud is built for flexible, general purpose computing. An AI factory has to make the GPUs, CPUs, storage, networking and software work together like one giant system. That is basically what Nebius is building. Nebius VP of Product Narek T. says customers are choosing the platform mainly because of reliability and performance. Having the newest Nvidia GPUs is nice but at this scale that is not enough. Customers care about how efficiently thousands of GPUs work together and, more importantly, what happens when something breaks and something will break. When you are running thousands of GPUs, hardware failures are inevitable. Nebius says its platform can automatically detect and replace unhealthy nodes in roughly 12 to 15 minutes while protecting the workload. Manually, that process can take hours. That matters because an AI lab does not want a massive training run getting interrupted every time one server fails. Nebius is also getting extremely early access to Nvidia’s newest systems. It was the first cloud provider in Europe to put GB300 NVL72 into production and the first globally to connect it with 800 Gbps Quantum X800 InfiniBand. Each GB300 NVL72 rack combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs into one liquid cooled system, with NVLink essentially making the rack behave like one enormous GPU. Nebius can then connect multiple racks together for even larger training and reasoning workloads. And they are already preparing for Vera Rubin.mThis is where the story gets more interesting to me. Nebius does not want to just rent GPUs by the hour forever. The company is also building serverless inference products where customers pay for actually running models and producing tokens and that could be a MUCH better business. Nvidia recently said Nebius software optimizations increased token throughput on the same GB300 hardware by as much as 2.7x in six months, while reducing cost per token by more than 60%.. That means Nebius can generate more tokens, more revenue and better economics from the same amount of data center power. Extremely bullish on $NBIS

Melvin

21,381 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Adoption is not a dividend: tokenization's value has to reach the thing you actually own "Should we have been more careful what we wish for? More precise? Yes. Less ambitious? No." "Wanting better financial infrastructure was not the mistake. Assuming everybody holding a related token would get rich from it was." "Tokenization could make legitimate investments easier to distribute, reduce waste and make parts of finance more competitive. I want that. I just want us to stop treating every step toward it as proof that our portfolios are positioned correctly." "The gains will depend on business models, competition rules and the choices customers are allowed to make. Some will flow to institutions. Some may flow to public networks. Some can reach ordinary people through better products and lower costs." "Watch what gets built. Watch who controls access. When someone shows you how enormous this market could become, ask them to show you how the value reaches the thing you actually own." "Adoption is not a dividend. A token is not automatically an ownership stake. And being early to the right idea is not the same as owning the right investment."
1:11

Adoption is not a dividend: tokenization's value has to reach the thing you actually own "Should we have been more careful what we wish for? More precise? Yes. Less ambitious? No." "Wanting better financial infrastructure was not the mistake. Assuming everybody holding a related token would get rich from it was." "Tokenization could make legitimate investments easier to distribute, reduce waste and make parts of finance more competitive. I want that. I just want us to stop treating every step toward it as proof that our portfolios are positioned correctly." "The gains will depend on business models, competition rules and the choices customers are allowed to make. Some will flow to institutions. Some may flow to public networks. Some can reach ordinary people through better products and lower costs." "Watch what gets built. Watch who controls access. When someone shows you how enormous this market could become, ask them to show you how the value reaches the thing you actually own." "Adoption is not a dividend. A token is not automatically an ownership stake. And being early to the right idea is not the same as owning the right investment."

The Wolf Of All Streets

18,059 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.
0:24

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.

X Finance Bull

16,025 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"Satoshi didn't create blockchain so we could more efficiently distribute USD to people around the world" Multicoin co-founder Tushar Jain on the dilution of the cypherpunk ethos "The first thing that I saw was this dilution of the cypherpunk ethos that got the industry started" "That was not the original vision. But if you take a step back and think about what is the most core value for Bitcoin and for the early cypherpunks, it's censorship resistance" "Decentralization is a means to censorship resistance. It's a means of, I can own something that no one can forcibly take away from me, and no one can stop me from spending it or using it how I wish"
0:58

"Satoshi didn't create blockchain so we could more efficiently distribute USD to people around the world" Multicoin co-founder Tushar Jain on the dilution of the cypherpunk ethos "The first thing that I saw was this dilution of the cypherpunk ethos that got the industry started" "That was not the original vision. But if you take a step back and think about what is the most core value for Bitcoin and for the early cypherpunks, it's censorship resistance" "Decentralization is a means to censorship resistance. It's a means of, I can own something that no one can forcibly take away from me, and no one can stop me from spending it or using it how I wish"

The Wolf Of All Streets

53,695 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon wants Treasury Dept to run on Blockchain as we now find out career officials are breaking the law every hour of every day by approving payments that are fraudulent or match funding laws passed by Congress Great news Elon Musk because Treasury Department is already running on-onchain and here are some of the things they are testing ✅DLT for Transparent Ownership Records: Digital ledger technology provides a transparent and immutable record of ownership for tokenized assets. Each transaction involving tokenized assets is recorded on the blockchain, creating a tamper-proof audit trail of ownership transfers. DLT ensures transparency and trust in the ownership history of tokenized assets, mitigating the risk of fraud and disputes ✅AI-Powered Asset Valuation and Risk Assessment: AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data to assess the value and risk of tokenized assets. Machine learning models can incorporate financial data, market trends, and other relevant factors to provide accurate valuations and risk assessments in real-time. AI-powered analytics can help investors make informed decisions about buying, selling, or holding tokenized assets based on their risk appetite and investment objectives ✅Automated Compliance and Regulatory Reporting: AI can automate compliance processes and regulatory reporting requirements for tokenized financial products. Machine learning algorithms can monitor transactions for suspicious activities, detect potential compliance violations, and generate regulatory reports automatically. By integrating AI-powered compliance solutions with DLT-based platforms, financial institutions can ensure regulatory compliance while minimizing operational costs and risks. ✅Decentralized Governance and Decision-Making: DAOs enable decentralized governance structures where stakeholders collectively make decisions about the management and operation of tokenized financial products. Token holders within DAOs can vote on key governance issues, such as asset allocation, dividend distribution, and protocol upgrades. Decentralized governance ensures transparency, accountability, and community participation in the management of financial product ---------------------- All of this is running on the same DLT that is the number one data focused blockchain used by @DeptofDefense 🇺🇸IRON SPIDR Powered by Constellation² $DAG
4:18

Elon wants Treasury Dept to run on Blockchain as we now find out career officials are breaking the law every hour of every day by approving payments that are fraudulent or match funding laws passed by Congress Great news Elon Musk because Treasury Department is already running on-onchain and here are some of the things they are testing ✅DLT for Transparent Ownership Records: Digital ledger technology provides a transparent and immutable record of ownership for tokenized assets. Each transaction involving tokenized assets is recorded on the blockchain, creating a tamper-proof audit trail of ownership transfers. DLT ensures transparency and trust in the ownership history of tokenized assets, mitigating the risk of fraud and disputes ✅AI-Powered Asset Valuation and Risk Assessment: AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data to assess the value and risk of tokenized assets. Machine learning models can incorporate financial data, market trends, and other relevant factors to provide accurate valuations and risk assessments in real-time. AI-powered analytics can help investors make informed decisions about buying, selling, or holding tokenized assets based on their risk appetite and investment objectives ✅Automated Compliance and Regulatory Reporting: AI can automate compliance processes and regulatory reporting requirements for tokenized financial products. Machine learning algorithms can monitor transactions for suspicious activities, detect potential compliance violations, and generate regulatory reports automatically. By integrating AI-powered compliance solutions with DLT-based platforms, financial institutions can ensure regulatory compliance while minimizing operational costs and risks. ✅Decentralized Governance and Decision-Making: DAOs enable decentralized governance structures where stakeholders collectively make decisions about the management and operation of tokenized financial products. Token holders within DAOs can vote on key governance issues, such as asset allocation, dividend distribution, and protocol upgrades. Decentralized governance ensures transparency, accountability, and community participation in the management of financial product ---------------------- All of this is running on the same DLT that is the number one data focused blockchain used by @DeptofDefense 🇺🇸IRON SPIDR Powered by Constellation² $DAG

Dagnum²

17,293 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Most people think capitalism means Wall Street. Stock tickers, quarterly earnings, asset prices on a screen. That picture is not just incomplete. It is actively misleading. Wall Street is not capitalism. Financial markets are not free markets. And stock traders do not trade capital in any meaningful sense. Capital, properly understood, is productive enterprise. The bakery, the machine shop, the software company that earns revenue by serving customers voluntarily. That is the heart of it. Financial markets can serve that system. At their best, they help businesses raise money, allocate savings, and expand. Money becomes capital. That is the correct direction. The problem is when finance reverses the arrow. When the question stops being how can finance help businesses produce more value, and becomes how can financial players generate returns from financial activity itself. A stock market boom does not mean the real economy is healthy. A rising index does not mean workers are more productive, businesses more competitive, or customers better served. And bailouts are not capitalism either. A system that privatizes gains and socializes losses is not a market system. It is a privilege system. Failure is not a bug in capitalism. It is a feature. Losses carry information. They force adaptation. They clear space for new ideas. The engine of capitalism is competition. The discipline is failure. The reward is innovation and rising living standards for everyone. That is what most people miss.
22:46

Most people think capitalism means Wall Street. Stock tickers, quarterly earnings, asset prices on a screen. That picture is not just incomplete. It is actively misleading. Wall Street is not capitalism. Financial markets are not free markets. And stock traders do not trade capital in any meaningful sense. Capital, properly understood, is productive enterprise. The bakery, the machine shop, the software company that earns revenue by serving customers voluntarily. That is the heart of it. Financial markets can serve that system. At their best, they help businesses raise money, allocate savings, and expand. Money becomes capital. That is the correct direction. The problem is when finance reverses the arrow. When the question stops being how can finance help businesses produce more value, and becomes how can financial players generate returns from financial activity itself. A stock market boom does not mean the real economy is healthy. A rising index does not mean workers are more productive, businesses more competitive, or customers better served. And bailouts are not capitalism either. A system that privatizes gains and socializes losses is not a market system. It is a privilege system. Failure is not a bug in capitalism. It is a feature. Losses carry information. They force adaptation. They clear space for new ideas. The engine of capitalism is competition. The discipline is failure. The reward is innovation and rising living standards for everyone. That is what most people miss.

Jeffrey P. Snider

19,277 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

City Protocol co-founder kyle on the gap tokenization still has to close: A tokenized product today is still a claim on the asset. Final settlement happens with the authoritative entities off-chain, so the market runs in two worlds. We expects the two systems to merge for the sake of efficiency, and City Protocol is building toward that. Full video:
0:37

City Protocol co-founder kyle on the gap tokenization still has to close: A tokenized product today is still a claim on the asset. Final settlement happens with the authoritative entities off-chain, so the market runs in two worlds. We expects the two systems to merge for the sake of efficiency, and City Protocol is building toward that. Full video:

City Protocol

16,482 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In America there is something called ‘Adverse possession’ Someone can legally take the property rights of your home or property in as little as 5 years in some states “The day that I learned somebody can gain property rights or ownership of a property through a process called adverse possession after meeting a certain amount of years and requirements, and they can claim ownership of land that they've just been living on, that might have been one of the scariest things I've ever realized as a law student.” This is real To successfully claim adverse possession, the occupant typically must prove their use of the property was: - Actual, meaning they physically occupied or used the land (e.g., living on it, farming it, maintaining it) - Open and notorious: Visible and obvious to anyone (including the true owner), not hidden. A Exclusive: Not shared with the public or the true owner. - Continuous: Uninterrupted for the full statutory period. Ownership can be claimed and transferred in as short as 5 years in some states like California, with additional requirements like paying taxes - Commonly 10–20 years in many states. - Up to 30 years in a few places. So essentially some squatter could legitimately claim someones second property or home they don’t visit
1:11

In America there is something called ‘Adverse possession’ Someone can legally take the property rights of your home or property in as little as 5 years in some states “The day that I learned somebody can gain property rights or ownership of a property through a process called adverse possession after meeting a certain amount of years and requirements, and they can claim ownership of land that they've just been living on, that might have been one of the scariest things I've ever realized as a law student.” This is real To successfully claim adverse possession, the occupant typically must prove their use of the property was: - Actual, meaning they physically occupied or used the land (e.g., living on it, farming it, maintaining it) - Open and notorious: Visible and obvious to anyone (including the true owner), not hidden. A Exclusive: Not shared with the public or the true owner. - Continuous: Uninterrupted for the full statutory period. Ownership can be claimed and transferred in as short as 5 years in some states like California, with additional requirements like paying taxes - Commonly 10–20 years in many states. - Up to 30 years in a few places. So essentially some squatter could legitimately claim someones second property or home they don’t visit

Wall Street Apes

88,264 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Yeah, Chainlink $LINK has been stuck for years. Watch this Rollup interview, because the next stage of tokenization could change how people value Chainlink completely. Most people hear “tokenized stocks” and think the job ends once the stock is put onchain. It doesn’t. Once markets run 24/7, everything behind those markets also has to keep running. -Prices. -Margin. -Collateral. -Securities lending. -Prime brokerage. -Compliance. -Cash settlement. -Cross-chain movement. -Risk management. That backend is where I think Chainlink gets really interesting. And DTCC is already validating the architecture. DTCC processed roughly $4.7 quadrillion in securities transactions in 2025 and serviced about $114 trillion of securities. Now its Collateral AppChain is integrating Chainlink Runtime Environment, Chainlink data, and cross-chain functionality for workflows like valuation, margining, collateral optimization, settlement and post-trade processes. That is serious. Think about a tokenized NVIDIA position trading on a Sunday. Its price moves. Margin requirements change. Collateral needs to be revalued. Maybe more collateral has to move. Maybe cash sits on another network. Maybe the security is held by a different custodian. All of that has to coordinate automatically. That is the market Chainlink is building around. CRE can coordinate the workflow. CCIP can connect different networks. Data Streams can handle valuation. ACE can bring compliance into the transaction. Fulcrum can handle institutional financing and collateral. And Chainlink just launched Fulcrum specifically around this kind of 24/7 cross-chain institutional financing. The bigger the tokenized market becomes, the more these assets need to be traded, lent, pledged, margined, moved and financed. One tokenized stock can create dozens of recurring Chainlink interactions. That is a lot bigger than one oracle price feed. And there is finally a clearer connection back to the token. Institutions can pay Chainlink in fiat or stablecoins. Payment Abstraction can convert eligible revenue into LINK. The Chainlink Reserve already holds millions of LINK, while tens of millions more are staked. So I’m looking at a much bigger equation now: 24/7 finance → more Chainlink workflows → more revenue → more LINK entering the economic system. $LINK price may have spent years frustrating holders. But if Chainlink becomes one of the standards coordinating tokenized finance, I think the market eventually has to look at LINK very differently.
2:21

Yeah, Chainlink $LINK has been stuck for years. Watch this Rollup interview, because the next stage of tokenization could change how people value Chainlink completely. Most people hear “tokenized stocks” and think the job ends once the stock is put onchain. It doesn’t. Once markets run 24/7, everything behind those markets also has to keep running. -Prices. -Margin. -Collateral. -Securities lending. -Prime brokerage. -Compliance. -Cash settlement. -Cross-chain movement. -Risk management. That backend is where I think Chainlink gets really interesting. And DTCC is already validating the architecture. DTCC processed roughly $4.7 quadrillion in securities transactions in 2025 and serviced about $114 trillion of securities. Now its Collateral AppChain is integrating Chainlink Runtime Environment, Chainlink data, and cross-chain functionality for workflows like valuation, margining, collateral optimization, settlement and post-trade processes. That is serious. Think about a tokenized NVIDIA position trading on a Sunday. Its price moves. Margin requirements change. Collateral needs to be revalued. Maybe more collateral has to move. Maybe cash sits on another network. Maybe the security is held by a different custodian. All of that has to coordinate automatically. That is the market Chainlink is building around. CRE can coordinate the workflow. CCIP can connect different networks. Data Streams can handle valuation. ACE can bring compliance into the transaction. Fulcrum can handle institutional financing and collateral. And Chainlink just launched Fulcrum specifically around this kind of 24/7 cross-chain institutional financing. The bigger the tokenized market becomes, the more these assets need to be traded, lent, pledged, margined, moved and financed. One tokenized stock can create dozens of recurring Chainlink interactions. That is a lot bigger than one oracle price feed. And there is finally a clearer connection back to the token. Institutions can pay Chainlink in fiat or stablecoins. Payment Abstraction can convert eligible revenue into LINK. The Chainlink Reserve already holds millions of LINK, while tens of millions more are staked. So I’m looking at a much bigger equation now: 24/7 finance → more Chainlink workflows → more revenue → more LINK entering the economic system. $LINK price may have spent years frustrating holders. But if Chainlink becomes one of the standards coordinating tokenized finance, I think the market eventually has to look at LINK very differently.

X Finance Bull

20,445 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

🚨SEC OFFICIALLY GREENLIT TOKENIZED U.S. STOCK TRADING🚨 $XRP, $XLM and $HBAR have been building toward this moment for years. I went through the actual SEC order, and one detail changes how I look at all three. The SEC’s new five-year Innovation Exemption allows qualifying Tokenized Securities Venues to trade real tokenized U.S. stocks through permissioned AMMs and liquidity pools on public blockchains. These tokenized shares must preserve the rights of the underlying stock. But here is the part that matters for crypto. A tokenized U.S. stock can be paired with a non-security crypto asset. And the SEC specifically says the exemption does not limit which type of non-security crypto asset a venue can choose. Now go back six months. The SEC’s March interpretation explicitly listed: XRP XLM HBAR as examples of digital commodities. Read those two developments together. For the first time, I can look at a federal framework where a real tokenized U.S. stock and assets like XRP, XLM or HBAR can potentially exist on opposite sides of the same regulated onchain market. Think: Tokenized stock / XRP Tokenized stock / XLM Tokenized stock / HBAR The real opportunity is not a few network fees. It is liquidity. If a professional market maker supports one of those pools, it needs inventory of the paired asset. That is a completely different type of demand. And these three ecosystems have not been sitting around waiting for tokenization to arrive. Ripple and Aviva Investors are already exploring traditional fund tokenization on XRPL. XRPL has native trading infrastructure, AMMs, credentials, permissioning and tokenization tools. Stellar already hosts roughly $4B in tokenized assets, and DTCC/DTC plans to connect its tokenization service to Stellar, with Russell 1000 stocks, major ETFs and U.S. Treasuries among the asset classes being evaluated. Then Hedera already has Archax, with 100+ tokenized assets and $300M+ in value across names including Aberdeen, State Street, Fidelity International, Legal & General and BlackRock-related fund exposure. Lloyds Banking Group has already used tokenized assets on Hedera as collateral for FX activity. That is why this SEC move feels different to me. These networks spent years building the rails. Now U.S. regulation is starting to create an actual market structure where stocks can move onchain and non-security crypto assets can sit directly beside them as liquidity pairs. That is a much bigger story than “tokenization is bullish.” This is traditional securities liquidity and crypto liquidity beginning to meet. $XRP, $XLM and $HBAR are already standing at that intersection. Which digital commodity gets chosen for the first REAL tokenized-stock liquidity pair?
1:25

🚨SEC OFFICIALLY GREENLIT TOKENIZED U.S. STOCK TRADING🚨 $XRP, $XLM and $HBAR have been building toward this moment for years. I went through the actual SEC order, and one detail changes how I look at all three. The SEC’s new five-year Innovation Exemption allows qualifying Tokenized Securities Venues to trade real tokenized U.S. stocks through permissioned AMMs and liquidity pools on public blockchains. These tokenized shares must preserve the rights of the underlying stock. But here is the part that matters for crypto. A tokenized U.S. stock can be paired with a non-security crypto asset. And the SEC specifically says the exemption does not limit which type of non-security crypto asset a venue can choose. Now go back six months. The SEC’s March interpretation explicitly listed: XRP XLM HBAR as examples of digital commodities. Read those two developments together. For the first time, I can look at a federal framework where a real tokenized U.S. stock and assets like XRP, XLM or HBAR can potentially exist on opposite sides of the same regulated onchain market. Think: Tokenized stock / XRP Tokenized stock / XLM Tokenized stock / HBAR The real opportunity is not a few network fees. It is liquidity. If a professional market maker supports one of those pools, it needs inventory of the paired asset. That is a completely different type of demand. And these three ecosystems have not been sitting around waiting for tokenization to arrive. Ripple and Aviva Investors are already exploring traditional fund tokenization on XRPL. XRPL has native trading infrastructure, AMMs, credentials, permissioning and tokenization tools. Stellar already hosts roughly $4B in tokenized assets, and DTCC/DTC plans to connect its tokenization service to Stellar, with Russell 1000 stocks, major ETFs and U.S. Treasuries among the asset classes being evaluated. Then Hedera already has Archax, with 100+ tokenized assets and $300M+ in value across names including Aberdeen, State Street, Fidelity International, Legal & General and BlackRock-related fund exposure. Lloyds Banking Group has already used tokenized assets on Hedera as collateral for FX activity. That is why this SEC move feels different to me. These networks spent years building the rails. Now U.S. regulation is starting to create an actual market structure where stocks can move onchain and non-security crypto assets can sit directly beside them as liquidity pairs. That is a much bigger story than “tokenization is bullish.” This is traditional securities liquidity and crypto liquidity beginning to meet. $XRP, $XLM and $HBAR are already standing at that intersection. Which digital commodity gets chosen for the first REAL tokenized-stock liquidity pair?

X Finance Bull

103,078 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat