Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Tom DeLonge on UFO's: "There is time dilation caused by the gravity bubble" 👽🛸 "You could fly around and take a Coke can out of somebody's hand and put it in somebody else's hand" He explained to Joe Rogan about real time travel through an artificially created bubble of...

InterstellarUAP's profile picture

Interstellar

134,784 subscribers

104,868 views • 25 days ago •via X (Twitter)

GamingNews & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Bob Lazar on the Incredible Frozen Candle & Time Dilation Test at AREA 51 👽🛸😱 They point the gravity emitter at it and “The flame stopped flickering. It just stood like it was a photograph of itself.” Then: “It’s that flame is frozen in time.” Bob replies: “It can’t be because I can see it. If it was frozen in time, there wouldn’t be photons emitting from it.” But it was. Science + Alien tech = The ultimate “What the hell” clip. What do you think is really happening here? Real time dilation from gravity manipulation? Could this tech actually exist? Drop your thoughts 👇
3:09

🚨 Bob Lazar on the Incredible Frozen Candle & Time Dilation Test at AREA 51 👽🛸😱 They point the gravity emitter at it and “The flame stopped flickering. It just stood like it was a photograph of itself.” Then: “It’s that flame is frozen in time.” Bob replies: “It can’t be because I can see it. If it was frozen in time, there wouldn’t be photons emitting from it.” But it was. Science + Alien tech = The ultimate “What the hell” clip. What do you think is really happening here? Real time dilation from gravity manipulation? Could this tech actually exist? Drop your thoughts 👇

Interstellar

123,558 views • 3 months ago

"In a fantasy or science fiction story, you can get away with one big lie. You can include one thing that's convenient for the author in order to make the plot work. In Children of Time, the question is 'what if a species of a spider developed a society, civilization, and technology. But the big lie is literally that there is a nanovirus is assisting the uplift of the spiders, and the lie is the amount of time that'll take. Because of the nanovirus, that happens in tens of thousands of years rather than hundreds of millions of years, which you would need by evolution. People need to read a book and think 'that's a thing that could happen.' It gives your book a weight and gravity that it would not have if it was magic talking spiders. So in order to support your One Big Lie, everything else needs to be true." — Adrian Tchaikovsky
0:58

"In a fantasy or science fiction story, you can get away with one big lie. You can include one thing that's convenient for the author in order to make the plot work. In Children of Time, the question is 'what if a species of a spider developed a society, civilization, and technology. But the big lie is literally that there is a nanovirus is assisting the uplift of the spiders, and the lie is the amount of time that'll take. Because of the nanovirus, that happens in tens of thousands of years rather than hundreds of millions of years, which you would need by evolution. People need to read a book and think 'that's a thing that could happen.' It gives your book a weight and gravity that it would not have if it was magic talking spiders. So in order to support your One Big Lie, everything else needs to be true." — Adrian Tchaikovsky

David Perell

66,006 views • 5 months ago

ELON MUSK: "We can make a moon base, and I think it'll be pretty cool if you could have a vacation on the moon, like that would be the most epic vacation. I think that will be possible in the future. And then Mars is another step beyond that. Mars is a whole planet, and with gravity much closer to that of Earth, and it has an atmosphere, and if you warm up Mars, you could one day make Mars like Earth, meaning with like liquid oceans and life, and where you could walk outside without a spacesuit type of thing."
1:34

ELON MUSK: "We can make a moon base, and I think it'll be pretty cool if you could have a vacation on the moon, like that would be the most epic vacation. I think that will be possible in the future. And then Mars is another step beyond that. Mars is a whole planet, and with gravity much closer to that of Earth, and it has an atmosphere, and if you warm up Mars, you could one day make Mars like Earth, meaning with like liquid oceans and life, and where you could walk outside without a spacesuit type of thing."

DogeDesigner

37,342 views • 1 month ago

Bob Lazar on Joe Rogan: “The craft came from Zeta Reticuli… but that information may not be true.” 👽 "Maybe The UFO did not come from space, maybe it's different dimensions - Anything is possible" In his return to the JRE, the Area 51 whistleblower questions the old briefing he received and explains these craft don’t “Fly” like we think they create a gravity distortion bubble with no friction, deforming space-time around them. What if it’s disinformation? Are they extraterrestrial, interdimensional, or something else entirely? What do you think is the real origin of these craft? Drop your theory below.
1:03

Bob Lazar on Joe Rogan: “The craft came from Zeta Reticuli… but that information may not be true.” 👽 "Maybe The UFO did not come from space, maybe it's different dimensions - Anything is possible" In his return to the JRE, the Area 51 whistleblower questions the old briefing he received and explains these craft don’t “Fly” like we think they create a gravity distortion bubble with no friction, deforming space-time around them. What if it’s disinformation? Are they extraterrestrial, interdimensional, or something else entirely? What do you think is the real origin of these craft? Drop your theory below.

Interstellar

12,503 views • 2 months ago

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”
3:13

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”

Jawwwn

695,385 views • 5 months ago

This is cool AF, they put a bunch of stuff in this time capsule from this day and age..... and they're burying it for (250) years.... until they open it again.... I've been thinking what I would put in there.... what would you add to the capsule if you could Happy 4th of July
0:51

This is cool AF, they put a bunch of stuff in this time capsule from this day and age..... and they're burying it for (250) years.... until they open it again.... I've been thinking what I would put in there.... what would you add to the capsule if you could Happy 4th of July

@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

10,736 views • 12 days ago

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good enough. When it comes to working out sometimes all you need is a few minutes if you use that the right way with intensity and going beyond what you did last time. This is the concept of progressive overload and this is what you need to make progress in the gym. you don’t need two hours of workouts that completely drains you in order to make progress and be healthy. in fact, some of my best workouts arrive when I’m on a time crunch and the quality and intensity and effort of the exercise exercises have to be on point.
1:03

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good enough. When it comes to working out sometimes all you need is a few minutes if you use that the right way with intensity and going beyond what you did last time. This is the concept of progressive overload and this is what you need to make progress in the gym. you don’t need two hours of workouts that completely drains you in order to make progress and be healthy. in fact, some of my best workouts arrive when I’m on a time crunch and the quality and intensity and effort of the exercise exercises have to be on point.

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

11,671 views • 16 days ago

If "they" (ultraterrestrials?) can do this, what else can they form out of thin air? Craft? Bodies/beings (AI?) that we think are ET? A lot of folks think this is bullshit and Leslie was fooled. I'm not one of them. I've read some of the same books about various physical mediums that Leslie mentions and it certainly seems like this is a real phenomenon. She (and David Haith) saw this in person at a Stewart Alexander (SA) seance. Leslie was a few feet away and shook the hand. This type of thing has been reported to be happening since at least the 1800s. Is it the dead communicating with us? I lean towards...NO. See Keel's take (I'll tweet that later today), which could be what's going on. LK on the alleged materialization of a hand. Why isn't it filmed? SA says he doesn't want his life turned upside down and disrupted, and he believes putting out a video showing this process would do just that. So he just keeps doing his thing every week. Skeptics would dismiss it and others would ask for more. SA is fine with the way things are now. Leslie: I have experienced this materialization many times and so have many other people. The table has a light under it and is illuminated. SA is strapped into his chair and has luminous knee pads on so you can see he's in his chair. "You see this vaporous cloud of ectoplasm coming over the edge of the table, towards my hand. It sort of looks like water, it's kind of moving. And it gets bigger and bigger. And then you start to see these sort of digits forming in it. You can see this hand forming before your eyes. There's a certain moment where it becomes from flat to three dimensional. And it's a fully-formed hand that you can see." The first time the hand appears, it forms a first and pounds on the table so everybody knows it's physical. Then the hand withdraws and the whole process repeats itself. "Then I'm allowed to touch that hand. I held that materialized hand, which didn't exist 30 seconds before I held it. It was an absolutely normal, human hand. Large. What was interesting to me was it was very warm and very soft. The skin felt like a baby's skin to me. Which kind of made sense to me bc it was just formed. It was like a large, male hand, there's nothing abnormal about it. It moved, it had all the structures of a hand." Leslie says the hand belongs to the spirit entity named Walter and he orchestrates the entire thing. I'm gonna repost this later with the full notes and quotes and the Keel excerpt, which might explain what is going on here and the possible connection to the phenomenon. Gonna go watch Leslie on Curt Jaimungal now. #ufotwitter #uaptwitter #ufo #uap #ufos Source:
13:20

If "they" (ultraterrestrials?) can do this, what else can they form out of thin air? Craft? Bodies/beings (AI?) that we think are ET? A lot of folks think this is bullshit and Leslie was fooled. I'm not one of them. I've read some of the same books about various physical mediums that Leslie mentions and it certainly seems like this is a real phenomenon. She (and David Haith) saw this in person at a Stewart Alexander (SA) seance. Leslie was a few feet away and shook the hand. This type of thing has been reported to be happening since at least the 1800s. Is it the dead communicating with us? I lean towards...NO. See Keel's take (I'll tweet that later today), which could be what's going on. LK on the alleged materialization of a hand. Why isn't it filmed? SA says he doesn't want his life turned upside down and disrupted, and he believes putting out a video showing this process would do just that. So he just keeps doing his thing every week. Skeptics would dismiss it and others would ask for more. SA is fine with the way things are now. Leslie: I have experienced this materialization many times and so have many other people. The table has a light under it and is illuminated. SA is strapped into his chair and has luminous knee pads on so you can see he's in his chair. "You see this vaporous cloud of ectoplasm coming over the edge of the table, towards my hand. It sort of looks like water, it's kind of moving. And it gets bigger and bigger. And then you start to see these sort of digits forming in it. You can see this hand forming before your eyes. There's a certain moment where it becomes from flat to three dimensional. And it's a fully-formed hand that you can see." The first time the hand appears, it forms a first and pounds on the table so everybody knows it's physical. Then the hand withdraws and the whole process repeats itself. "Then I'm allowed to touch that hand. I held that materialized hand, which didn't exist 30 seconds before I held it. It was an absolutely normal, human hand. Large. What was interesting to me was it was very warm and very soft. The skin felt like a baby's skin to me. Which kind of made sense to me bc it was just formed. It was like a large, male hand, there's nothing abnormal about it. It moved, it had all the structures of a hand." Leslie says the hand belongs to the spirit entity named Walter and he orchestrates the entire thing. I'm gonna repost this later with the full notes and quotes and the Keel excerpt, which might explain what is going on here and the possible connection to the phenomenon. Gonna go watch Leslie on Curt Jaimungal now. #ufotwitter #uaptwitter #ufo #uap #ufos Source:

Joe Murgia

82,472 views • 3 years ago

Don’t Scroll—God Is Calling You to Submit and Move Praise the Lord that He has given us such a commission and such a call and we should be humbled by that and we should want to go out for His kingdom and do that. All of you are usable by God. There is not one of you that is not usable if you're only willing to submit. We all fall short. It's a matter of who is willing. Here I am, Lord, send me. That's what Isaiah said. Here I am. Send me. You are all usable. When a lot of you out there go, well, what can I do for God in my life? There's a lot you can do. If you're only willing to be picked up as an instrument in his Hands and implemented the way you were created to move. Many of you are operating outside the realm of what you were created to be. And in this season, that's going to be reconciled. And many of you are going to change course in this season drastically. Because you're in jobs, you're in areas, you're doing things, you were not created to do. You have gifts for it, but you weren’t created to do it. And there's going to be massive shifts in many of your lives and a sudden turn. And the Lord is going to realign. And this is going to be quick when He does it. Realign you into the position, redirect you and put you on that course because time is short and He needs you operating in what you were created to do. He needs that right now. And many of you are going to enter that process in this season. So praise the Lord because you are. You will enter that process and you will be redirected. And you will do what is written about you in the books of heaven, what you were created to do on this earth. Because many of you know and feel uncomfortable and know you're not in your call. You know you are just trying to try to endure, you're trying to survive. And it's because you're not in your call. Surrender to God, allow Him to redirect you into your call and your purpose that you were beautifully created to do. Because it's needed in this season and we cannot dilly dally anymore and go dabbling in things we are not created to do. It's time for us to go to work and it's time for us to be willing to go there.
2:23

Don’t Scroll—God Is Calling You to Submit and Move Praise the Lord that He has given us such a commission and such a call and we should be humbled by that and we should want to go out for His kingdom and do that. All of you are usable by God. There is not one of you that is not usable if you're only willing to submit. We all fall short. It's a matter of who is willing. Here I am, Lord, send me. That's what Isaiah said. Here I am. Send me. You are all usable. When a lot of you out there go, well, what can I do for God in my life? There's a lot you can do. If you're only willing to be picked up as an instrument in his Hands and implemented the way you were created to move. Many of you are operating outside the realm of what you were created to be. And in this season, that's going to be reconciled. And many of you are going to change course in this season drastically. Because you're in jobs, you're in areas, you're doing things, you were not created to do. You have gifts for it, but you weren’t created to do it. And there's going to be massive shifts in many of your lives and a sudden turn. And the Lord is going to realign. And this is going to be quick when He does it. Realign you into the position, redirect you and put you on that course because time is short and He needs you operating in what you were created to do. He needs that right now. And many of you are going to enter that process in this season. So praise the Lord because you are. You will enter that process and you will be redirected. And you will do what is written about you in the books of heaven, what you were created to do on this earth. Because many of you know and feel uncomfortable and know you're not in your call. You know you are just trying to try to endure, you're trying to survive. And it's because you're not in your call. Surrender to God, allow Him to redirect you into your call and your purpose that you were beautifully created to do. Because it's needed in this season and we cannot dilly dally anymore and go dabbling in things we are not created to do. It's time for us to go to work and it's time for us to be willing to go there.

Amanda Grace

12,379 views • 2 months ago

Age of Disclosure...🧐🤔🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸 They mentioned a “bubble” that keeps everything “normal” for beings inside the bubble in regards to time and space, but those outside of the bubble see the craft ascend at breakneck speed. One of the witnesses mentioned the “bubble” is why people had issues taking clear pictures of the craft in the past. It’s because we are trying to take pictures of the space and time barrier. With the sensor upgrades, we are able to see more clearly.
1:49

Age of Disclosure...🧐🤔🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸 They mentioned a “bubble” that keeps everything “normal” for beings inside the bubble in regards to time and space, but those outside of the bubble see the craft ascend at breakneck speed. One of the witnesses mentioned the “bubble” is why people had issues taking clear pictures of the craft in the past. It’s because we are trying to take pictures of the space and time barrier. With the sensor upgrades, we are able to see more clearly.

UFO mania

91,968 views • 7 months ago

a channel who talks about fortunes posted a video with yushi in it! I won’t translate in detail but a summary of what was said instead (saju > four pillars of destiny) - the saju of a beast - only the face looks cute. the body, the inside and everything else is just a beast - has a big gap between how they look on the outside and what they’re like on the inside which gives him an unexpected charm - has ambitions so big that you could even call them 4D and their personality supports that too - a strong preference for doing what they enjoy and can be quite stubborn when it comes to doing things he doesn’t want to
2:57

a channel who talks about fortunes posted a video with yushi in it! I won’t translate in detail but a summary of what was said instead (saju > four pillars of destiny) - the saju of a beast - only the face looks cute. the body, the inside and everything else is just a beast - has a big gap between how they look on the outside and what they’re like on the inside which gives him an unexpected charm - has ambitions so big that you could even call them 4D and their personality supports that too - a strong preference for doing what they enjoy and can be quite stubborn when it comes to doing things he doesn’t want to

🍪

23,371 views • 1 year ago

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that Wichita Lineman has to be one of the best written songs of that era or love songs in general! And you know, that's saying a lot because there are so many that have stood the test of time! What song has lyrics and a melody that just grab you each time you hear it?
0:44

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that Wichita Lineman has to be one of the best written songs of that era or love songs in general! And you know, that's saying a lot because there are so many that have stood the test of time! What song has lyrics and a melody that just grab you each time you hear it?

Croxxed Out

18,446 views • 1 month ago

Elon Musk: If you have billions of humanoid robots — and I think there will be — everyone on Earth is going to have one and want one. Assuming it’s very safe, who wouldn’t want a robot to watch over your kids, take care of your pets, and help with daily life? There just aren’t enough young people to take care of the old people. Taking care of elderly parents is difficult and expensive. A robot that could care for and protect an elderly parent would be an amazing thing to have. If you had a robot that could take care of your elderly parents, protect them, and be there 24/7, that would be great. That would be a truly life-changing technology for families around the world. I’m very optimistic about the future. I think we’re headed toward a future of amazing abundance — and that’s very cool. We are living in the most interesting time in history. On aging — I haven’t put much time into it yet, but I do think it’s a very solvable problem. When we figure out what causes aging, I think we’ll find it’s incredibly obvious. It’s not subtle.
1:39

Elon Musk: If you have billions of humanoid robots — and I think there will be — everyone on Earth is going to have one and want one. Assuming it’s very safe, who wouldn’t want a robot to watch over your kids, take care of your pets, and help with daily life? There just aren’t enough young people to take care of the old people. Taking care of elderly parents is difficult and expensive. A robot that could care for and protect an elderly parent would be an amazing thing to have. If you had a robot that could take care of your elderly parents, protect them, and be there 24/7, that would be great. That would be a truly life-changing technology for families around the world. I’m very optimistic about the future. I think we’re headed toward a future of amazing abundance — and that’s very cool. We are living in the most interesting time in history. On aging — I haven’t put much time into it yet, but I do think it’s a very solvable problem. When we figure out what causes aging, I think we’ll find it’s incredibly obvious. It’s not subtle.

Ian Miles Cheong

25,737 views • 5 months ago

🚨President Trump announced that there might be a high-level meeting with Zelenskyy as early as this weekend, but didn’t specify if he would participate, and once again reiterated that UA should hold elections right now (note: it’s against the constitution to hold elections during the martial law, also it’s simply not safe, and UA society is widely opposed to the idea). TRUMP: “They would like us to go to a meeting over the weekend, in Europe, and we’ll make a determination depending on what they come back with. We don’t wanna be wasting time. Sometimes you have to let people fight it out, and sometimes you don’t. But the problem with letting people fight it out is you’re losing thousands of people a week. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Q: “And when you say that the European leaders want to have a meeting over the weekend, are you talking about with Zelenskyy or with them?” TRUMP: “With Zelenskyy and us.” Q: “And you said in an interview yesterday that you think it’s time for Zelenskyy to start accepting things. What things are you talking about?” TRUMP: “Well, I think he has to be realistic. And I do wonder about how long is it gonna be till they have an election. You know, for a democracy, it’s a long time. They haven’t had an election in a long time. There was a poll that came out, 82% of the people are demanding a settlement be made, Ukrainian people. They wanna see a settlement be made. I understand that. They’re losing thousands and thousands of people a week. They wanna see it ended. And I do say at what point, when do they have an election in Ukraine? That’s not casting aspersions on anybody, but they do have a massive corruption situation going on there… People are asking this question, ‘When do they have an election?’ Are they gonna have an election, or are they gonna just keep it going like this? So, I think it’s time to get that war settled, and I think it’s a war that can be settled. But it takes two to tango.”
1:54

🚨President Trump announced that there might be a high-level meeting with Zelenskyy as early as this weekend, but didn’t specify if he would participate, and once again reiterated that UA should hold elections right now (note: it’s against the constitution to hold elections during the martial law, also it’s simply not safe, and UA society is widely opposed to the idea). TRUMP: “They would like us to go to a meeting over the weekend, in Europe, and we’ll make a determination depending on what they come back with. We don’t wanna be wasting time. Sometimes you have to let people fight it out, and sometimes you don’t. But the problem with letting people fight it out is you’re losing thousands of people a week. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Q: “And when you say that the European leaders want to have a meeting over the weekend, are you talking about with Zelenskyy or with them?” TRUMP: “With Zelenskyy and us.” Q: “And you said in an interview yesterday that you think it’s time for Zelenskyy to start accepting things. What things are you talking about?” TRUMP: “Well, I think he has to be realistic. And I do wonder about how long is it gonna be till they have an election. You know, for a democracy, it’s a long time. They haven’t had an election in a long time. There was a poll that came out, 82% of the people are demanding a settlement be made, Ukrainian people. They wanna see a settlement be made. I understand that. They’re losing thousands and thousands of people a week. They wanna see it ended. And I do say at what point, when do they have an election in Ukraine? That’s not casting aspersions on anybody, but they do have a massive corruption situation going on there… People are asking this question, ‘When do they have an election?’ Are they gonna have an election, or are they gonna just keep it going like this? So, I think it’s time to get that war settled, and I think it’s a war that can be settled. But it takes two to tango.”

Kateryna Lisunova

10,801 views • 7 months ago

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.
5:13

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

The Peel

209,752 views • 1 year ago

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”
1:43

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 views • 9 months ago

Dave Ramsey explains why the government stopped making you pay your taxes by hand, and what would happen if it started again. RAMSEY: “If we brought this back, there would be a revolution. People would burn Washington, DC, down. “If the tax person from the IRS had to stand in the lobby of your company, and you got paid in cash, and you had to take your cash and hand it to the tax collector and count it out every time you got paid, people would realize how big a tick on your butt the government is, how big a parasite the government is. “And they would, I’m telling you, there’d be pitchforks and torches. “If you actually saw and physically had to take possession of the money and then give it back in cash to the government when you got paid, people’s faces would melt off.” KAMEL: “Just the amount of $100 bills you’re just giving to the IRS for doing nothing. That hurts. It would be a Tea Party round two.” RAMSEY: “So it was a really brilliant idea to do income tax withholding.” KAMEL: “Just make it all behind the scenes.” RAMSEY: “Brilliant psychological trick.”
1:39

Dave Ramsey explains why the government stopped making you pay your taxes by hand, and what would happen if it started again. RAMSEY: “If we brought this back, there would be a revolution. People would burn Washington, DC, down. “If the tax person from the IRS had to stand in the lobby of your company, and you got paid in cash, and you had to take your cash and hand it to the tax collector and count it out every time you got paid, people would realize how big a tick on your butt the government is, how big a parasite the government is. “And they would, I’m telling you, there’d be pitchforks and torches. “If you actually saw and physically had to take possession of the money and then give it back in cash to the government when you got paid, people’s faces would melt off.” KAMEL: “Just the amount of $100 bills you’re just giving to the IRS for doing nothing. That hurts. It would be a Tea Party round two.” RAMSEY: “So it was a really brilliant idea to do income tax withholding.” KAMEL: “Just make it all behind the scenes.” RAMSEY: “Brilliant psychological trick.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

732,182 views • 7 days ago

This Lewis Hamilton appreciation post by Hanifah and Ada, of the podcast 'Seasoned Sessions' 🥹 "People like him, I wonder what are the other athletes doing? Do you get what I mean? Because Lewis has, does everything." "Like one thing, you just seem so calm, collected. I can never imagine you raising your voice just like, you look so soft and calm. Like could just hold you. Like he could do a sleep story. Yes, you could do that CBeebies, read the book to the kids type thing. And I would clock in. He probably has done that." [HE HAS] "You dress so well. Wide audience. You really have an appreciation for fashion. You're at so many events. Like not to be the center, but you are the center because you just be chilling. You have a really eclectic friendship group. And the people I see you associate with, I'm like, wow, where did you guys meet? Who even knows? And then you are really charitable. "So you're using your 24 hours because also you're the best F1 driver in the world, in history. How have you, how do you manage to do all that? And then you look at other people that just do, I, I'm just sport." "Yeah, he's a well-rounded individual. It's like, how do you have all the time? Like, how do you have all the time and still be the greatest of all time? Do you get what I mean? Not that you were the greatest of all time. You were actively the greatest of all time. You were also producing the new F1 film.. also you're a rapper as well. A secret rapper. He's on one of Christina Aguilera's ones. He has a pseudonym. [XNDA] So he doesn't even really push it. He just pops up. He just pops on. He's enjoying life." "That's like, you know when people are like, when I become famous, I want to do a bit of everything. He's that thing, like, I have the resources to do everything I've ever wanted to do. And I'm actually going to do it well." "But one thing I do really appreciate about him is like, he doesn't do it in a way where it's like, I just want to be about, and here's my key differences - Lewis Hamilton made a post yesterday. Made a post yesterday about support, highlighting Black women at the Met. And just basically giving certain people accolades for what they've done for the Met and for fashion, and obviously for dandyism. Everyone's like, this is how you applaud Black women in this space." "But Lewis had like really put it at certain people like Regina King, like Lauryn Hill, etc. Also given them like really drawn out paragraph of like the specifics of what Black women have done to help this part of culture. And like he always makes sure he speaks highly of Black women. Whereas like, you know, there's a clear difference of people that are performative and people that actually love it." "And I think one side is performative, which loads of people are. Is it a critique? Maybe, who knows. And then one person is like truly in this. And that's Lewis." [Seasoned Sessions on Tik Tok : @/seasonedb]
3:20

This Lewis Hamilton appreciation post by Hanifah and Ada, of the podcast 'Seasoned Sessions' 🥹 "People like him, I wonder what are the other athletes doing? Do you get what I mean? Because Lewis has, does everything." "Like one thing, you just seem so calm, collected. I can never imagine you raising your voice just like, you look so soft and calm. Like could just hold you. Like he could do a sleep story. Yes, you could do that CBeebies, read the book to the kids type thing. And I would clock in. He probably has done that." [HE HAS] "You dress so well. Wide audience. You really have an appreciation for fashion. You're at so many events. Like not to be the center, but you are the center because you just be chilling. You have a really eclectic friendship group. And the people I see you associate with, I'm like, wow, where did you guys meet? Who even knows? And then you are really charitable. "So you're using your 24 hours because also you're the best F1 driver in the world, in history. How have you, how do you manage to do all that? And then you look at other people that just do, I, I'm just sport." "Yeah, he's a well-rounded individual. It's like, how do you have all the time? Like, how do you have all the time and still be the greatest of all time? Do you get what I mean? Not that you were the greatest of all time. You were actively the greatest of all time. You were also producing the new F1 film.. also you're a rapper as well. A secret rapper. He's on one of Christina Aguilera's ones. He has a pseudonym. [XNDA] So he doesn't even really push it. He just pops up. He just pops on. He's enjoying life." "That's like, you know when people are like, when I become famous, I want to do a bit of everything. He's that thing, like, I have the resources to do everything I've ever wanted to do. And I'm actually going to do it well." "But one thing I do really appreciate about him is like, he doesn't do it in a way where it's like, I just want to be about, and here's my key differences - Lewis Hamilton made a post yesterday. Made a post yesterday about support, highlighting Black women at the Met. And just basically giving certain people accolades for what they've done for the Met and for fashion, and obviously for dandyism. Everyone's like, this is how you applaud Black women in this space." "But Lewis had like really put it at certain people like Regina King, like Lauryn Hill, etc. Also given them like really drawn out paragraph of like the specifics of what Black women have done to help this part of culture. And like he always makes sure he speaks highly of Black women. Whereas like, you know, there's a clear difference of people that are performative and people that actually love it." "And I think one side is performative, which loads of people are. Is it a critique? Maybe, who knows. And then one person is like truly in this. And that's Lewis." [Seasoned Sessions on Tik Tok : @/seasonedb]

sim

20,810 views • 1 year ago