Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Tony Xu has a test for every candidate who made it to his final interview at DoorDash. He'd hand them $20 and an exit clause. "Here's $20. Go get 100 customers in 8 hours. And if you want to leave right now, there's a plane ticket waiting." This wasn't...

Founder_Mode_'s profile picture

Founder Mode

169,452 subscribers

72,577 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimHaberler & PolitikaFinans
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

How a final round interview wth Tony Xu (Tony Xu) at DoorDash goes: "I'm going to give you 20 minutes and you can ask me any question that you want. But after the 20 minutes expires, I'm going to give you $20 that you can use to go and acquire 100 customers for us, and you have eight hours to do so. But here's also a plane ticket, in case you want to quit the interview now and just move on and find somewhere else to work. So much of what we were trying to test for early on is someone who's going to do something to go and collect information, as opposed to someone who's going to collect data, scrape information from the internet and do some magical analysis on it. What if none of that information existed? You have to go and do things in order to actually collect information."
1:38

How a final round interview wth Tony Xu (Tony Xu) at DoorDash goes: "I'm going to give you 20 minutes and you can ask me any question that you want. But after the 20 minutes expires, I'm going to give you $20 that you can use to go and acquire 100 customers for us, and you have eight hours to do so. But here's also a plane ticket, in case you want to quit the interview now and just move on and find somewhere else to work. So much of what we were trying to test for early on is someone who's going to do something to go and collect information, as opposed to someone who's going to collect data, scrape information from the internet and do some magical analysis on it. What if none of that information existed? You have to go and do things in order to actually collect information."

David Senra

396,578 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

In DoorDash's early hiring process, Tony Xu would give applicants $20 and 20 mins to ask him anything, challenging them to figure out how to acquire 100 customers in 8 hrs and actually execute it. He'll also put a plane ticket by side incase if they want to quit the interview. "I understand that this may not be what you signed up for but this is what it's going to feel like on most days, where you have no idea what to do then you're just going to have to do something about it "
1:31

In DoorDash's early hiring process, Tony Xu would give applicants $20 and 20 mins to ask him anything, challenging them to figure out how to acquire 100 customers in 8 hrs and actually execute it. He'll also put a plane ticket by side incase if they want to quit the interview. "I understand that this may not be what you signed up for but this is what it's going to feel like on most days, where you have no idea what to do then you're just going to have to do something about it "

Aish

646,532 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.Palmer Luckey is the reason why Lulu Cheng Meservey created the Go Direct manifesto: Anduril had to go direct. They had no other option: “You're going to call some mainstream reporter and say, ‘Hey, the guy who got fired from Facebook for supporting Trump that you hate is doing a thing and you should hear him out?’” “We were not going the traditional path of TechCrunch or what Palmer calls trying to get the coolest startup award at one of these conferences.” “We were going directly to Quantico, to Camp Pendleton, to the CIA. Literally walking into their building and speaking to them.” “ Why would you go to somebody else as a supplicant asking them to carry the message for you so that they can filter it through their worldview, and then their editor, and then put it into their publication, and then hope that that spray and pray reaches some of the people that you care about?” “When you do that you lose the power of your intensity. [The wrong way is] the founder relays the message to their PR person who puts it into their own words and then pitches an editor and then the editor reinterprets the message.” Work backwards: Go to the podcasts and places where your ideal customers and recruits are getting their information and just go there.
3:45

.Palmer Luckey is the reason why Lulu Cheng Meservey created the Go Direct manifesto: Anduril had to go direct. They had no other option: “You're going to call some mainstream reporter and say, ‘Hey, the guy who got fired from Facebook for supporting Trump that you hate is doing a thing and you should hear him out?’” “We were not going the traditional path of TechCrunch or what Palmer calls trying to get the coolest startup award at one of these conferences.” “We were going directly to Quantico, to Camp Pendleton, to the CIA. Literally walking into their building and speaking to them.” “ Why would you go to somebody else as a supplicant asking them to carry the message for you so that they can filter it through their worldview, and then their editor, and then put it into their publication, and then hope that that spray and pray reaches some of the people that you care about?” “When you do that you lose the power of your intensity. [The wrong way is] the founder relays the message to their PR person who puts it into their own words and then pitches an editor and then the editor reinterprets the message.” Work backwards: Go to the podcasts and places where your ideal customers and recruits are getting their information and just go there.

David Senra

22,170 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Vice President JD Vance explains why he chose to sit down with the sad cat ladies on The View, even though they hate his guts: “The President’s attitude on this is, and I really do believe this, is 'you go everywhere. You go anywhere to try and take the message'… What I love about this administration is we go everywhere, and The View has a lot of people who watch it. Now, most of them are not sympathetic to the administration. But if every 10 people who watch that show are not fans of ours, but you get the message out to one open-minded person, that was worth it in my view. And that’s how we’re going to win the future, is actually go out and persuade people even in hostile places.”
1:05

Vice President JD Vance explains why he chose to sit down with the sad cat ladies on The View, even though they hate his guts: “The President’s attitude on this is, and I really do believe this, is 'you go everywhere. You go anywhere to try and take the message'… What I love about this administration is we go everywhere, and The View has a lot of people who watch it. Now, most of them are not sympathetic to the administration. But if every 10 people who watch that show are not fans of ours, but you get the message out to one open-minded person, that was worth it in my view. And that’s how we’re going to win the future, is actually go out and persuade people even in hostile places.”

Glenn Beck

691,154 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."
2:55

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."

The Bulwark

25,818 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Tomorrow, I’m going to break a very large story with a piece of evidence that I just found out about after midnight tonight. The piece of evidence I found is THE biggest piece of evidence I was given tonight is going to make some of you laugh, make some of you scared, make some of you blink and go speechless, and many other things. It will be after I get out of church.. With this story will come apologies to people who are owed an apology, and I will sincerely mean that. To the ones who called me a liar, who knew the truth and covered it up, and who took part in it - your nightmare has only begun, as I plan on naming you, and taking every legal action I can against you.
2:49

Tomorrow, I’m going to break a very large story with a piece of evidence that I just found out about after midnight tonight. The piece of evidence I found is THE biggest piece of evidence I was given tonight is going to make some of you laugh, make some of you scared, make some of you blink and go speechless, and many other things. It will be after I get out of church.. With this story will come apologies to people who are owed an apology, and I will sincerely mean that. To the ones who called me a liar, who knew the truth and covered it up, and who took part in it - your nightmare has only begun, as I plan on naming you, and taking every legal action I can against you.

Ryan Nichols Sr.

58,417 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

DoorDash CEO Tony Xu says every single person at the company still does deliveries to this day, because there are 20 things that can go wrong bringing you a burrito and no way to learn them from behind a desk. "That is the DoorDash problem set, for better and for worse. I remember when we started DoorDash, I remember decomposing that there's almost like 20 mini systems, many little processes. If you imagine a checklist of just bringing you a burrito, there's 20 little things that you have to get right, because if anything goes wrong, you'd actually need to fix it." "And there's no way that you would know about this unless you actually did the deliveries yourself. This is exactly why, to this day, we still have everyone in the company dash, which is our way of saying doing deliveries. We still all do deliveries." "Because until you actually get into the physical world, until you find yourself stuck in the wrong elevator, or the wrong lobby to try to get upstairs to deliver something, until you get to the wrong alleyway for parking, until you get to the wrong place because you realize food gets made sometimes in three different stations inside a restaurant, until you actually experience those things, it's very difficult to a priori just intellectualize that and know about it."
1:12

DoorDash CEO Tony Xu says every single person at the company still does deliveries to this day, because there are 20 things that can go wrong bringing you a burrito and no way to learn them from behind a desk. "That is the DoorDash problem set, for better and for worse. I remember when we started DoorDash, I remember decomposing that there's almost like 20 mini systems, many little processes. If you imagine a checklist of just bringing you a burrito, there's 20 little things that you have to get right, because if anything goes wrong, you'd actually need to fix it." "And there's no way that you would know about this unless you actually did the deliveries yourself. This is exactly why, to this day, we still have everyone in the company dash, which is our way of saying doing deliveries. We still all do deliveries." "Because until you actually get into the physical world, until you find yourself stuck in the wrong elevator, or the wrong lobby to try to get upstairs to deliver something, until you get to the wrong alleyway for parking, until you get to the wrong place because you realize food gets made sometimes in three different stations inside a restaurant, until you actually experience those things, it's very difficult to a priori just intellectualize that and know about it."

Fireside Alpha

33,966 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

ELON: DESPERATE TIMES CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES. “There's no question that some of the people who were let go probably shouldn't have been let go. We simply did not have the time to figure out, we had to make widespread cuts to get the run rate under control. This is not to say that everyone who is let go from Twitter is somehow terrible. It's just that, with very little information, we have to get the headcount expenses and the non-personnel expenses down to where we're at least break even. And we're not quite at break even yet, but we're close. We need to do it fast. And if you do it fast, unfortunately, there are going to be some babies thrown out with the bath water. I definitely would not want to disparage anyone who has left. Like I said, desperate times call for desperate measures. And unfortunately, those were desperate times.” Source: Interview with David Faber, CNBC, May 2023
1:31

ELON: DESPERATE TIMES CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES. “There's no question that some of the people who were let go probably shouldn't have been let go. We simply did not have the time to figure out, we had to make widespread cuts to get the run rate under control. This is not to say that everyone who is let go from Twitter is somehow terrible. It's just that, with very little information, we have to get the headcount expenses and the non-personnel expenses down to where we're at least break even. And we're not quite at break even yet, but we're close. We need to do it fast. And if you do it fast, unfortunately, there are going to be some babies thrown out with the bath water. I definitely would not want to disparage anyone who has left. Like I said, desperate times call for desperate measures. And unfortunately, those were desperate times.” Source: Interview with David Faber, CNBC, May 2023

Mario Nawfal

113,078 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Caitlin Clark on the WNBA discourse: "You (Media) guys are the ones controlling the narratives about what people read. A lot of that is sometimes so far out of touch with reality and that can be confusing to someone who's 24. It gets exhausting, it gets frustrating. People don't want to talk about basketball, they just want to stir it up and make it something else.
1:33

Caitlin Clark on the WNBA discourse: "You (Media) guys are the ones controlling the narratives about what people read. A lot of that is sometimes so far out of touch with reality and that can be confusing to someone who's 24. It gets exhausting, it gets frustrating. People don't want to talk about basketball, they just want to stir it up and make it something else.

Ashwin

86,825 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Stripe co-founder John Collison on the two types of people who will thrive in the AI era over the next 10 to 20 years: He identifies two categories of people he's "super bullish on": First: high-agency people. "We know this at Stripe. The people who are like, I've been talking to customers. I know exactly what we should do. We got to go fix this. But the people who have that pep in their step and they want to go make Stripe better." The idea is simple. The people who don't wait around for permission, who figure out what needs doing and go do it, now have leverage they've never had before. AI lets them execute faster without needing to assemble a huge team behind them. Second: double majors. "I think if you understand software and understand finance or if you understand software and understand marketing, you now can go massively improve the entire marketing funnel for your company and one person can do." John Collison connects this to a famous Paul Graham observation: "Typically an entrepreneurship team a founding team has a collection of like five or six skills between two founders three founders." He also points to Charlie Munger's case for multidisciplinary thinking, noting it's easier than ever to pick up a functional grasp of new fields: "He thinks getting a functional understanding of many disciplines is not that hard you can just go read the books now you know you can talk to your AI about it and so I think multidisciplinary thinkers are going to do incredibly well." The throughline is the same for both: AI closes the gap between knowing what to do and being able to do it. One person can now move at the pace of a full team, and combine skills that used to require entire departments.
1:00

Stripe co-founder John Collison on the two types of people who will thrive in the AI era over the next 10 to 20 years: He identifies two categories of people he's "super bullish on": First: high-agency people. "We know this at Stripe. The people who are like, I've been talking to customers. I know exactly what we should do. We got to go fix this. But the people who have that pep in their step and they want to go make Stripe better." The idea is simple. The people who don't wait around for permission, who figure out what needs doing and go do it, now have leverage they've never had before. AI lets them execute faster without needing to assemble a huge team behind them. Second: double majors. "I think if you understand software and understand finance or if you understand software and understand marketing, you now can go massively improve the entire marketing funnel for your company and one person can do." John Collison connects this to a famous Paul Graham observation: "Typically an entrepreneurship team a founding team has a collection of like five or six skills between two founders three founders." He also points to Charlie Munger's case for multidisciplinary thinking, noting it's easier than ever to pick up a functional grasp of new fields: "He thinks getting a functional understanding of many disciplines is not that hard you can just go read the books now you know you can talk to your AI about it and so I think multidisciplinary thinkers are going to do incredibly well." The throughline is the same for both: AI closes the gap between knowing what to do and being able to do it. One person can now move at the pace of a full team, and combine skills that used to require entire departments.

Big Brain AI

96,360 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Asmongold pitches an Inglorious Bastards style deportation volunteer force "I would say, guys, do you want to volunteer to remove a bunch of people from the country? We're going to pay you room and board, give you a little extra money. If you want to take a few months off and go collect all these people, there's going to be basically no rules on how you do it. All you have to do is go get them." "I bet you would have millions of guys signing up for that immediately." "I'd go into the prisons. You're in jail for something nonviolent? If you can get 20 of these guys, your sentence is commuted. You're back out. You're good."
1:05

Asmongold pitches an Inglorious Bastards style deportation volunteer force "I would say, guys, do you want to volunteer to remove a bunch of people from the country? We're going to pay you room and board, give you a little extra money. If you want to take a few months off and go collect all these people, there's going to be basically no rules on how you do it. All you have to do is go get them." "I bet you would have millions of guys signing up for that immediately." "I'd go into the prisons. You're in jail for something nonviolent? If you can get 20 of these guys, your sentence is commuted. You're back out. You're good."

Asmongold Updates

21,465 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"At school or university, the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who can do that, but for the rest of us, we're not brilliant. And to get there, we have to strive and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right first time, you don't get it right second time. In my case, and I counted it, it's 5,127 times. One of the things I always want to say is that sounds like a struggle. It was a struggle, but actually it was a hugely enjoyable struggle. The debt was mounting and I had three children, a wife and a home, and then a mortgage to pay, like everybody else. But I had a real point in life, I had a real aim and I had to get there. And the failures were interesting because I'd learned from every single one of them."
0:51

"At school or university, the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who can do that, but for the rest of us, we're not brilliant. And to get there, we have to strive and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right first time, you don't get it right second time. In my case, and I counted it, it's 5,127 times. One of the things I always want to say is that sounds like a struggle. It was a struggle, but actually it was a hugely enjoyable struggle. The debt was mounting and I had three children, a wife and a home, and then a mortgage to pay, like everybody else. But I had a real point in life, I had a real aim and I had to get there. And the failures were interesting because I'd learned from every single one of them."

David Senra

137,546 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The "safe" plan everyone was told to follow has quietly become the most dangerous one. Go to school, get a job, retire at 65. DAN KOE says that script was written for a world that no longer exists. And with AI on the doorstep, the people who can't update are the ones about to get left behind. "If you are still operating on industrial age technology as a business, or you think that the right path to go down is go to school, get a job, retire at 65... you're running on this outdated software and you need to change it." Update, or get left behind.
1:10

The "safe" plan everyone was told to follow has quietly become the most dangerous one. Go to school, get a job, retire at 65. DAN KOE says that script was written for a world that no longer exists. And with AI on the doorstep, the people who can't update are the ones about to get left behind. "If you are still operating on industrial age technology as a business, or you think that the right path to go down is go to school, get a job, retire at 65... you're running on this outdated software and you need to change it." Update, or get left behind.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

100,405 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Your morning white pill from Jeremy Boreing is that to succeed, you must resist a victim mentality: “One of the great truths in life is that you cannot behave as a victim even if you are one- perhaps especially if you are one bc then it is actually reinforced by reality… One of the hardest things to do is to see yourself as a person with agency. It is the difference between the people who succeed in life and the people who don’t. It’s the difference between the people who are happy and the people who are not.”
0:37

Your morning white pill from Jeremy Boreing is that to succeed, you must resist a victim mentality: “One of the great truths in life is that you cannot behave as a victim even if you are one- perhaps especially if you are one bc then it is actually reinforced by reality… One of the hardest things to do is to see yourself as a person with agency. It is the difference between the people who succeed in life and the people who don’t. It’s the difference between the people who are happy and the people who are not.”

Jackie Chea ⚖️

30,530 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"Research is the most important thing. ... You got to research who it's going to hurt and why it's going to hurt them, and then you make a decision on how you go about it. You can still go about it and do it in a way that group of people appreciate it. If you can do it in a way the people who it would normally offend, appreciates it then you've done it correctly. I defend comedy over everything." - Ryan Davis
2:23

"Research is the most important thing. ... You got to research who it's going to hurt and why it's going to hurt them, and then you make a decision on how you go about it. You can still go about it and do it in a way that group of people appreciate it. If you can do it in a way the people who it would normally offend, appreciates it then you've done it correctly. I defend comedy over everything." - Ryan Davis

Club Shay Shay

88,797 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."
1:51

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

374,056 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Whoever wants it more wins. Lulu Cheng Meservey on why every founder needs a manifesto: “The purpose of a manifesto is to make concrete your intensity. To paint for people a vision of what the world could be.” “Once you see a good manifesto you can't get it out of your head. You have to go do it.” “The manifesto is the magnet. If you don't have that, you have no right to go up to someone and say ‘Leave your comfortable job and leave your beautiful family and come with me on what is probably a death mission.’” “There's no amount of money or incumbency that can overcome somebody who wants it so much more.”
0:56

Whoever wants it more wins. Lulu Cheng Meservey on why every founder needs a manifesto: “The purpose of a manifesto is to make concrete your intensity. To paint for people a vision of what the world could be.” “Once you see a good manifesto you can't get it out of your head. You have to go do it.” “The manifesto is the magnet. If you don't have that, you have no right to go up to someone and say ‘Leave your comfortable job and leave your beautiful family and come with me on what is probably a death mission.’” “There's no amount of money or incumbency that can overcome somebody who wants it so much more.”

David Senra

91,198 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Naval Ravikant on why it's 10,000 iterations, not 10,000 hours: "The only true test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life. And there are two parts to that: one is getting what you want, so you know how to get it. And the second is wanting the right things, knowing what to want in the first place." Naval believes most people are proceeding unconsciously through life. As he puts it: "If you're not careful you can end up in a place in life not only that you don't want to be, but one that you didn't even mean to get to. Usually, people end up there because they are going on autopilot with societal expectations or people's expectations. Out of guilt or mimetic desire, our desires are picked up from other people." On how little time we spend deciding: "We run on these four-year cycles. You go join a startup, you vest your stock over four years. College you go for four years, high school you go for four years. These are very long cycles, the amount of time we spend deciding what to do and who to do it with? Very short. Very, very short." He continues: "We spend three months deciding, one month deciding on a job where we're going to be for 10 years or 5 years. People decide frivolously which city to live in and that's going to decide who their friends are, what their jobs are, their opportunity, their weather, their food supply, their air supply, quality of life. It's such an important decision but people spend so little time thinking it through." His rule: "I would argue that if you're making a four-year decision, spend a year thinking it through. Like really thinking it. 25% of the time." On the secretary theorem: "The optimal time to search is somewhere around a third of the way through. You take the best person you've worked with and try to find someone that good or better. By the time you've got about a third of the way through, you have seen enough that you now have a sense of what the bar is. Then anybody who meets or exceeds that bar is good enough." But here's the catch: "It's actually not time-based; it's not based on one-third of the time, it's iteration-based. The number of candidates, the number of shots you took on goal. So you want to have lots and lots of iterations. You need to bail out quickly, and you need to be decisive quickly." On failed relationships: "If you go back and you look through failed relationships, probably the biggest regret will be staying in the relationship after you knew it was over. The moment you knew it wasn't going to work out, you should have moved on." His reframe of Malcolm Gladwell's 10,000 hours: "I would say it's actually 10,000 iterations to Mastery. It's not actually 10,000; it's some unknown number, but it's about the number of iterations that drives a learning curve. Iteration is not repetition—repetition is doing the same thing over and over. Iteration is modifying it with a learning and then doing another version of it. That's error correction." On modern society: "Modern society is far more forgiving of failure. Once you find the one business you're meant to plow into and compound returns, it's okay if you had 50 small failed ventures or 50 small failed job interviews. The number of failures doesn't matter." His approach: "You want to be skeptical about specific things—every specific opportunity is probably a fail. But you want to be optimistic in the general. Something in here is going to work out. You want to investigate and explore very, very quickly until you find the match. And then you have to be willing to go all in." On labels: "Labels like pessimist, optimist, cynic, introvert, extrovert, these are very self-limiting. Don't define yourself by trauma or PTSD because then you lock it into your identity and you're just going to loop on it. It's better to stay flexible because reality is always changing and you have to be able to adapt to it." Spend a year deciding. Take 10,000 iterations. Then go all in.
10:05

Naval Ravikant on why it's 10,000 iterations, not 10,000 hours: "The only true test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life. And there are two parts to that: one is getting what you want, so you know how to get it. And the second is wanting the right things, knowing what to want in the first place." Naval believes most people are proceeding unconsciously through life. As he puts it: "If you're not careful you can end up in a place in life not only that you don't want to be, but one that you didn't even mean to get to. Usually, people end up there because they are going on autopilot with societal expectations or people's expectations. Out of guilt or mimetic desire, our desires are picked up from other people." On how little time we spend deciding: "We run on these four-year cycles. You go join a startup, you vest your stock over four years. College you go for four years, high school you go for four years. These are very long cycles, the amount of time we spend deciding what to do and who to do it with? Very short. Very, very short." He continues: "We spend three months deciding, one month deciding on a job where we're going to be for 10 years or 5 years. People decide frivolously which city to live in and that's going to decide who their friends are, what their jobs are, their opportunity, their weather, their food supply, their air supply, quality of life. It's such an important decision but people spend so little time thinking it through." His rule: "I would argue that if you're making a four-year decision, spend a year thinking it through. Like really thinking it. 25% of the time." On the secretary theorem: "The optimal time to search is somewhere around a third of the way through. You take the best person you've worked with and try to find someone that good or better. By the time you've got about a third of the way through, you have seen enough that you now have a sense of what the bar is. Then anybody who meets or exceeds that bar is good enough." But here's the catch: "It's actually not time-based; it's not based on one-third of the time, it's iteration-based. The number of candidates, the number of shots you took on goal. So you want to have lots and lots of iterations. You need to bail out quickly, and you need to be decisive quickly." On failed relationships: "If you go back and you look through failed relationships, probably the biggest regret will be staying in the relationship after you knew it was over. The moment you knew it wasn't going to work out, you should have moved on." His reframe of Malcolm Gladwell's 10,000 hours: "I would say it's actually 10,000 iterations to Mastery. It's not actually 10,000; it's some unknown number, but it's about the number of iterations that drives a learning curve. Iteration is not repetition—repetition is doing the same thing over and over. Iteration is modifying it with a learning and then doing another version of it. That's error correction." On modern society: "Modern society is far more forgiving of failure. Once you find the one business you're meant to plow into and compound returns, it's okay if you had 50 small failed ventures or 50 small failed job interviews. The number of failures doesn't matter." His approach: "You want to be skeptical about specific things—every specific opportunity is probably a fail. But you want to be optimistic in the general. Something in here is going to work out. You want to investigate and explore very, very quickly until you find the match. And then you have to be willing to go all in." On labels: "Labels like pessimist, optimist, cynic, introvert, extrovert, these are very self-limiting. Don't define yourself by trauma or PTSD because then you lock it into your identity and you're just going to loop on it. It's better to stay flexible because reality is always changing and you have to be able to adapt to it." Spend a year deciding. Take 10,000 iterations. Then go all in.

Jaynit

69,475 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."
3:24

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."

Open Source Intel

118,810 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce