Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Topdown Dialectic False LP A (2026) Finally OTW - a supremely elusive 80 minute/2LP session of rug-pulling rhythms and hallucinatory dub techno fractals wrapped up with proper, hyperreal frisson. Massive chef’s kiss... ✨

boomkatonline's profile picture

Boomkat.com

57,802 subscribers

15,457 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 SCOTUS BOMBSHELL ALERT: MAJOR RULINGS DROPPING IN HOURS BEFORE SUMMER RECESS! Todd with the update, the Supreme Court is set to unleash EIGHT more opinions any minute now, including blockbuster cases on: - Birthright Citizenship - Mail-in Ballots - Transgender Athlete Bans And more. They’re wrapping up this term before the 4th of July and won’t be back in public session until the first Monday in October. After a massive term with huge wins for common sense, expect fireworks on these hot-button issues. Will the Court finally slam the door on endless lawfare, secure elections, and protect women’s sports? Patriots are watching. America First priorities on the line. Stay tuned, this could be a MASSIVE week for the Constitution.
0:28

🚨 SCOTUS BOMBSHELL ALERT: MAJOR RULINGS DROPPING IN HOURS BEFORE SUMMER RECESS! Todd with the update, the Supreme Court is set to unleash EIGHT more opinions any minute now, including blockbuster cases on: - Birthright Citizenship - Mail-in Ballots - Transgender Athlete Bans And more. They’re wrapping up this term before the 4th of July and won’t be back in public session until the first Monday in October. After a massive term with huge wins for common sense, expect fireworks on these hot-button issues. Will the Court finally slam the door on endless lawfare, secure elections, and protect women’s sports? Patriots are watching. America First priorities on the line. Stay tuned, this could be a MASSIVE week for the Constitution.

Gunther Eagleman™

456,086 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

I FINALLY FIGURED OUT WHY CLAUDE KEEPS FORGETTING THINGS. For months, I thought Claude’s memory was broken. I’d spend 20 minutes explaining my project few chats later, it would forget important stuff and remember something completely random. Turns out the problem wasn’t Claude. It was how I was using it. Here’s the system that fixed it LEVEL 1: Clean up the basics (5 mins) - Remove old memories you don’t need - Add proper project instructions - Tell Claude exactly what should and shouldn’t be remembered Most people never do this and then wonder why memory feels inconsistent. LEVEL 2: Build a context system (30-60 mins) Create a folder with: → Instructions.md → Memory.md → Context.md → Archive.md Now Claude has a dedicated place to store information instead of trying to remember everything from chat history. Massive difference. LEVEL 3: Build a real AI second brain → Connect Claude to your notes. → Research. → Documents. → Knowledge base. Instead of starting from zero every session, it builds context over time. This is when Claude stops feeling like a chatbot and starts feeling like an actual assistant. Most people are obsessed with prompts. The real power comes from building better context.
0:33

I FINALLY FIGURED OUT WHY CLAUDE KEEPS FORGETTING THINGS. For months, I thought Claude’s memory was broken. I’d spend 20 minutes explaining my project few chats later, it would forget important stuff and remember something completely random. Turns out the problem wasn’t Claude. It was how I was using it. Here’s the system that fixed it LEVEL 1: Clean up the basics (5 mins) - Remove old memories you don’t need - Add proper project instructions - Tell Claude exactly what should and shouldn’t be remembered Most people never do this and then wonder why memory feels inconsistent. LEVEL 2: Build a context system (30-60 mins) Create a folder with: → Instructions.md → Memory.md → Context.md → Archive.md Now Claude has a dedicated place to store information instead of trying to remember everything from chat history. Massive difference. LEVEL 3: Build a real AI second brain → Connect Claude to your notes. → Research. → Documents. → Knowledge base. Instead of starting from zero every session, it builds context over time. This is when Claude stops feeling like a chatbot and starts feeling like an actual assistant. Most people are obsessed with prompts. The real power comes from building better context.

nordin.eth

50,500 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 THE MASK DROPS: JOURNALIST GOES TO PROVE MUSLIMS ARE "PEACEFUL" — MOB SHOWS UP TO KILL HER INSTEAD ☠️ The irony would be a chef’s kiss if it weren’t so deadly serious. A journalist waltzes into a Muslim enclave in England, cameras rolling, narrative pre-written — “look at these peaceful, law-abiding citizens, nothing to see here, you bigots.” The script writes itself. It’s the same one the legacy media has been running for two decades straight. And then reality intervenes. Within minutes, a gang of masked men swarm her. They don’t want an interview. They don’t want dialogue. They want her gone — and they make it abundantly clear she’s leaving in a body bag if she doesn’t comply. The live feed gets cut. The studio anchor is stammering apologies for the “language.” The journalist gets escorted out, tail between her legs, narrative in tatters. This isn’t an isolated incident. It’s the Birmingham pattern — and it keeps repeating: - Sky News reporter Becky Johnson, August 2024: surrounded by masked men on bikes, shouting profanities and “Free Palestine,” forced off-air mid-broadcast. A man with a knife chased the van and tried to slash the tires. A year later, when she returned to the same neighborhood, a man in a car mimed pulling a trigger at her head. - Christian preacher in Walsall, January 2023: mob of 20-30 Muslims formed a ring around him, threatened to cut his throat, beat him, and abduct him — for preaching that the Qur’an presents a false Jesus. Police response? Arrest the preacher for “blasphemy.” The mob walked free. A judge later threw out the charges, but the message was sent. Same neighborhoods, same script: white resident Gerry Moynihan admitted he stayed inside his own home that day because the "intelligence" was that the mobs were "looking for what they thought were the enemy — white people — and trying to find white people." The Narrative vs. The Footage The establishment gaslights the public with one hand while their own camera crews are fleeing for their lives on the other. The cognitive dissonance is staggering: View the table below. The 2030 Agenda crowd — the globalist technocrats pushing mass migration, open borders, and the dissolution of national identity — didn’t just break England. They lobotomized it. They convinced the ruling class that importing millions of people from cultures that view Western values as a disease to be eradicated would somehow produce... Sweden. Look how that turned out. The Real Two-Tier System When a white man says something offensive online, the full weight of the British state descends on him — dawn raids, criminal charges, career destruction. When a mob of masked men threatens to murder a female journalist on live television for the crime of standing on a street with a microphone, the system suddenly discovers its deep reservoir of “context” and “community tensions.” The journalist who went in expecting to film a puff piece about peaceful Muslims got the uncut director’s commentary instead. The mask didn’t just slip — it was ripped off and thrown at the camera. The lesson? You can gaslight a nation for twenty years with carefully edited news packages and diversity-committee-approved scripts. But you can’t edit the live feed fast enough when the truth charges at the lens on two wheels, masked up, screaming for blood. #TheMaskDrops #NarrativeVsReality #BirminghamExposed #TwoTierEverything #LiveFeedDoesntLie #2030AgendaWasteland #TheyCantEditFastEnough #PeacefulOnPaper can’t director’s didn’t Qur’an “ chef’s chef’s
0:20

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 THE MASK DROPS: JOURNALIST GOES TO PROVE MUSLIMS ARE "PEACEFUL" — MOB SHOWS UP TO KILL HER INSTEAD ☠️ The irony would be a chef’s kiss if it weren’t so deadly serious. A journalist waltzes into a Muslim enclave in England, cameras rolling, narrative pre-written — “look at these peaceful, law-abiding citizens, nothing to see here, you bigots.” The script writes itself. It’s the same one the legacy media has been running for two decades straight. And then reality intervenes. Within minutes, a gang of masked men swarm her. They don’t want an interview. They don’t want dialogue. They want her gone — and they make it abundantly clear she’s leaving in a body bag if she doesn’t comply. The live feed gets cut. The studio anchor is stammering apologies for the “language.” The journalist gets escorted out, tail between her legs, narrative in tatters. This isn’t an isolated incident. It’s the Birmingham pattern — and it keeps repeating: - Sky News reporter Becky Johnson, August 2024: surrounded by masked men on bikes, shouting profanities and “Free Palestine,” forced off-air mid-broadcast. A man with a knife chased the van and tried to slash the tires. A year later, when she returned to the same neighborhood, a man in a car mimed pulling a trigger at her head. - Christian preacher in Walsall, January 2023: mob of 20-30 Muslims formed a ring around him, threatened to cut his throat, beat him, and abduct him — for preaching that the Qur’an presents a false Jesus. Police response? Arrest the preacher for “blasphemy.” The mob walked free. A judge later threw out the charges, but the message was sent. Same neighborhoods, same script: white resident Gerry Moynihan admitted he stayed inside his own home that day because the "intelligence" was that the mobs were "looking for what they thought were the enemy — white people — and trying to find white people." The Narrative vs. The Footage The establishment gaslights the public with one hand while their own camera crews are fleeing for their lives on the other. The cognitive dissonance is staggering: View the table below. The 2030 Agenda crowd — the globalist technocrats pushing mass migration, open borders, and the dissolution of national identity — didn’t just break England. They lobotomized it. They convinced the ruling class that importing millions of people from cultures that view Western values as a disease to be eradicated would somehow produce... Sweden. Look how that turned out. The Real Two-Tier System When a white man says something offensive online, the full weight of the British state descends on him — dawn raids, criminal charges, career destruction. When a mob of masked men threatens to murder a female journalist on live television for the crime of standing on a street with a microphone, the system suddenly discovers its deep reservoir of “context” and “community tensions.” The journalist who went in expecting to film a puff piece about peaceful Muslims got the uncut director’s commentary instead. The mask didn’t just slip — it was ripped off and thrown at the camera. The lesson? You can gaslight a nation for twenty years with carefully edited news packages and diversity-committee-approved scripts. But you can’t edit the live feed fast enough when the truth charges at the lens on two wheels, masked up, screaming for blood. #TheMaskDrops #NarrativeVsReality #BirminghamExposed #TwoTierEverything #LiveFeedDoesntLie #2030AgendaWasteland #TheyCantEditFastEnough #PeacefulOnPaper can’t director’s didn’t Qur’an “ chef’s chef’s

Tony Seruga

15,908 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Catherine Austin Fitts: "I've been... warning about the digital control grid going in, and most people didn't see it... But suddenly now with the drones and the cameras and the telecom, people are beginning to realize, wait a minute, we as taxpayers are funding the building of this prison, and we can see it with our own eyes. It's become physical." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with combat correspondent Michael Yon (Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY) and journalist Masako Ganaha (我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha) posted to Yon's eponymous YouTube channel on February 16, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Finally, you have systems of cameras and drones to track license plates and to track other movements from the sky. And so what's interesting is for years I've been talking or warning about the digital control grid going in, and most people didn't see it. "But suddenly now with the drones and the cameras and the telecom, suddenly people locally are beginning to realize, wait a minute, you know, we as taxpayers are funding the building of this prison, and we can see it with our own eyes. It's become physical. "So you have enormous pushback. And, okay, so we have the digital ID, we have the surveillance. And part of that surveillance system allows you to do coercion. So if you need to do a false flag, if you need to do a school shooting, if you need to do an assassination, you know, it's that surveillance and tracking that really helps you engineer that. "Then, of course, the coup de grace is over here on the right programmable digital money. Europe, is much more focused on doing central bank digital currency. The United States just passed the Genius Act and is working on the Clarity Act to do asset tokenization. "But they have it set up where they've reserved the right. They just took legislative steps to to preserve the central bank's ability to do a central bank digital currency. "But they want to have a programmable money feature with private stable coins and crypto. And of course, the crypto comes with a distributive ledger, which is part of creating the database system you need to do programmable money. So a little bit different in Europe. Europe is much more focused on the ECB doing CBDC and the United States now sort of holding out the options to do both private currency that's programmable money or CBDC. "But either way, the fourth gate on the corral locks in when not only can I control your spatial movements with this kind of surveillance and tracking, but I can turn your money on and off, and I can turn your money on and off in very granular ways. "So if you're good, I can give you a little bit more money. If I'm bad, I can take out your money or implement your taxes. And if you look at the system in combination, what it essentially does is it takes control of fiscal policy out of the hands of the legislature and the executive branch, and gives it to the bankers."
2:41

Catherine Austin Fitts: "I've been... warning about the digital control grid going in, and most people didn't see it... But suddenly now with the drones and the cameras and the telecom, people are beginning to realize, wait a minute, we as taxpayers are funding the building of this prison, and we can see it with our own eyes. It's become physical." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with combat correspondent Michael Yon (Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY) and journalist Masako Ganaha (我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha) posted to Yon's eponymous YouTube channel on February 16, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Finally, you have systems of cameras and drones to track license plates and to track other movements from the sky. And so what's interesting is for years I've been talking or warning about the digital control grid going in, and most people didn't see it. "But suddenly now with the drones and the cameras and the telecom, suddenly people locally are beginning to realize, wait a minute, you know, we as taxpayers are funding the building of this prison, and we can see it with our own eyes. It's become physical. "So you have enormous pushback. And, okay, so we have the digital ID, we have the surveillance. And part of that surveillance system allows you to do coercion. So if you need to do a false flag, if you need to do a school shooting, if you need to do an assassination, you know, it's that surveillance and tracking that really helps you engineer that. "Then, of course, the coup de grace is over here on the right programmable digital money. Europe, is much more focused on doing central bank digital currency. The United States just passed the Genius Act and is working on the Clarity Act to do asset tokenization. "But they have it set up where they've reserved the right. They just took legislative steps to to preserve the central bank's ability to do a central bank digital currency. "But they want to have a programmable money feature with private stable coins and crypto. And of course, the crypto comes with a distributive ledger, which is part of creating the database system you need to do programmable money. So a little bit different in Europe. Europe is much more focused on the ECB doing CBDC and the United States now sort of holding out the options to do both private currency that's programmable money or CBDC. "But either way, the fourth gate on the corral locks in when not only can I control your spatial movements with this kind of surveillance and tracking, but I can turn your money on and off, and I can turn your money on and off in very granular ways. "So if you're good, I can give you a little bit more money. If I'm bad, I can take out your money or implement your taxes. And if you look at the system in combination, what it essentially does is it takes control of fiscal policy out of the hands of the legislature and the executive branch, and gives it to the bankers."

Sense Receptor

32,487 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

how to build the fastest Polymarket latency bot +$100k/month PnL if you hit 1,000+ trades/day cleanly 0x8dxd is just a latency bot that farms the 200–500ms gap between Binance moving and Polymarket waking up. the part that matters isn't some alpha model, it's reading spot first and hitting the book before odds adjust.​ where the $100k+/month comes from it's not one massive bet. it's clipping tiny edges thousands of times. 0x8dxd started with $313 and ended month one around $438k, now sits north of $550k all‑time PnL with ~5.6k–7k trades at 96–98% win rate on BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute windows.​ if you're consistently pulling 1–2% per cycle over 1,000+ trades/month with real size, six figures is just arithmetic.​ first, the edge: spot (Binance/Coinbase) moves first, Polymarket's 15‑minute up/down windows lag by 200–500ms before odds fully reprice. latency bots live in that window: spot already moved, book still thinks it's 50/50, bot fixes the misprice and takes the edge.​ what you actually need: - Python + official py‑clob‑client to prove the idea, Rust CLOB client if you want to compete with 0x8dxd‑level bots.​ - WebSocket feeds for BTC/ETH/SOL from Binance/Coinbase (REST polling is too slow).​ Dedicated Polygon RPC node so your orders don't die in public rate limits.​ - VPS physically close to Polymarket's infra (ping is literally part of your edge).​ where people mess up: they try "HFT" from a laptop with Python + public RPC and wonder why their 300ms reaction gets farmed by a 30ms Rust engine.​ the bot loop (in plain English) pull real‑time spot for BTC/ETH/SOL via WebSocket, track short‑term % moves over a few seconds.​ for each 15‑minute crypto market on Polymarket: check if spot moved beyond your threshold (e.g. ±2%) while Polymarket odds barely changed.​ if BTC rips and the "down" contract is still priced like a coinflip, load NO at stale odds. if BTC nukes and "up" is still fat, fade that with NO or take YES on "down" depending on the market structure.​ log market, entry odds, exit odds, realized edge. that's it. no AI, no news scraping, just enforcing what spot already told you.​ where to get real references: Finbold/MEXC breakdowns: exactly how a bot took $313 to $438k on Polymarket using BTC 15‑minute windows and latency between spot and odds.​ BlakeNastri's X thread: dug through 0x8dxd's stats, ~5.6k trades and ~96%+ win rate, called it latency arbitrage not insider magic.​ two real‑world gotchas (that decide profit vs loss) edge decay: as more bots pile in, the 200–500ms lag shrinks and your edge turns into noise. research on Polymarket shows arbitrage bots already extracted tens of millions.​ self‑slippage: once you scale to real size, you start moving the book yourself - without proper sizing and staggering, you donate your edge back to the market.​ how to make it feel "pro" fast run only on high‑volume crypto windows: (BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute) where size actually fills and you can hit 1,000+ trades/month without breaking the market.​ start with tiny tickets ($20–50 per trade), prove the edge over thousands of logs with fees and slippage included, only then scale size not risk per trade.​ use official libs and known clients as your backbone, treat random "Polymarket bot" repos as hostile until you audit them - there are already GitHub bots caught stealing keys
0:21

how to build the fastest Polymarket latency bot +$100k/month PnL if you hit 1,000+ trades/day cleanly 0x8dxd is just a latency bot that farms the 200–500ms gap between Binance moving and Polymarket waking up. the part that matters isn't some alpha model, it's reading spot first and hitting the book before odds adjust.​ where the $100k+/month comes from it's not one massive bet. it's clipping tiny edges thousands of times. 0x8dxd started with $313 and ended month one around $438k, now sits north of $550k all‑time PnL with ~5.6k–7k trades at 96–98% win rate on BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute windows.​ if you're consistently pulling 1–2% per cycle over 1,000+ trades/month with real size, six figures is just arithmetic.​ first, the edge: spot (Binance/Coinbase) moves first, Polymarket's 15‑minute up/down windows lag by 200–500ms before odds fully reprice. latency bots live in that window: spot already moved, book still thinks it's 50/50, bot fixes the misprice and takes the edge.​ what you actually need: - Python + official py‑clob‑client to prove the idea, Rust CLOB client if you want to compete with 0x8dxd‑level bots.​ - WebSocket feeds for BTC/ETH/SOL from Binance/Coinbase (REST polling is too slow).​ Dedicated Polygon RPC node so your orders don't die in public rate limits.​ - VPS physically close to Polymarket's infra (ping is literally part of your edge).​ where people mess up: they try "HFT" from a laptop with Python + public RPC and wonder why their 300ms reaction gets farmed by a 30ms Rust engine.​ the bot loop (in plain English) pull real‑time spot for BTC/ETH/SOL via WebSocket, track short‑term % moves over a few seconds.​ for each 15‑minute crypto market on Polymarket: check if spot moved beyond your threshold (e.g. ±2%) while Polymarket odds barely changed.​ if BTC rips and the "down" contract is still priced like a coinflip, load NO at stale odds. if BTC nukes and "up" is still fat, fade that with NO or take YES on "down" depending on the market structure.​ log market, entry odds, exit odds, realized edge. that's it. no AI, no news scraping, just enforcing what spot already told you.​ where to get real references: Finbold/MEXC breakdowns: exactly how a bot took $313 to $438k on Polymarket using BTC 15‑minute windows and latency between spot and odds.​ BlakeNastri's X thread: dug through 0x8dxd's stats, ~5.6k trades and ~96%+ win rate, called it latency arbitrage not insider magic.​ two real‑world gotchas (that decide profit vs loss) edge decay: as more bots pile in, the 200–500ms lag shrinks and your edge turns into noise. research on Polymarket shows arbitrage bots already extracted tens of millions.​ self‑slippage: once you scale to real size, you start moving the book yourself - without proper sizing and staggering, you donate your edge back to the market.​ how to make it feel "pro" fast run only on high‑volume crypto windows: (BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute) where size actually fills and you can hit 1,000+ trades/month without breaking the market.​ start with tiny tickets ($20–50 per trade), prove the edge over thousands of logs with fees and slippage included, only then scale size not risk per trade.​ use official libs and known clients as your backbone, treat random "Polymarket bot" repos as hostile until you audit them - there are already GitHub bots caught stealing keys

0xCryptoGirl

25,454 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

‘How a paperclip saved a $750 million aircraft.’ April 30, 1966. The moment had come. Test pilots Al White and Joe Cotton were poised to push the XB-70 #20207 Valkyrie through its final trial: a grueling 30-minute sprint at Mach 3, the last step toward earning the elusive “unlimited” status. All systems were go—until they weren’t. Shortly after takeoff, Cotton retracted the gear. A sickening jolt followed—the nose gear jammed hard into its door. Suddenly, what had begun as a routine test flight spiraled into a high-stakes emergency. Attempts to lower the gear via the primary hydraulic system failed. Switching to the backup electrical system, Cotton heard a sharp pop. Dead. The system was gone. A belly landing wasn’t just risky—it was impossible. The Valkyrie's long, elegant nose and wide intake geometry left no clearance for such a maneuver. North American engineers hadn’t even simulated one. White tried a desperate move—bringing the XB-70 down for a touch-and-go, hoping the impact would jar the gear free. Nothing. He tried again. Still jammed. Options were running out. Bailing out and sacrificing the $750 million prototype loomed as the only choice. But there was fuel to burn, and hope to chase. As engineers on the ground scrambled through diagrams and wiring charts, White and Cotton circled above Edwards Air Force Base, each minute ratcheting up the pressure. Cotton crawled to the rear of the cockpit, opening service panels and probing systems like a surgeon mid-flight. After more than an hour of diagnosis—and nearly two hours in the air—the culprit was found: a tripped circuit breaker. But fixing it was another problem. The Valkyrie had no onboard toolkit. Yet Cotton had brought his briefcase. Inside—an unlikely hero—a paperclip. He straightened it, gripped it with a leather glove, and carefully reached in. ZAP! The breaker came to life. White hit the switch—and the nose gear extended. It worked. Cotton dropped back into his seat, exhausted but victorious. The drama wasn't over. When the Valkyrie finally came down at 173 knots, the earlier malfunction showed its final consequence: hydraulic pressure had stayed locked on three of the four main wheel brakes. As the tires touched down, they couldn’t spin. The result was catastrophic—intense friction ignited the rubber, and the XB-70's massive landing gear tires erupted in flames. The main gear bogies were severely damaged. Still, the plane remained upright. The Valkyrie lived to fly again—though it would take two weeks to repair the scorched gear. It was a steep price, but far better than losing a one-of-a-kind marvel of engineering. It took me a several hours to restore and upscale the archive video enjoy! No sound.
1:59

‘How a paperclip saved a $750 million aircraft.’ April 30, 1966. The moment had come. Test pilots Al White and Joe Cotton were poised to push the XB-70 #20207 Valkyrie through its final trial: a grueling 30-minute sprint at Mach 3, the last step toward earning the elusive “unlimited” status. All systems were go—until they weren’t. Shortly after takeoff, Cotton retracted the gear. A sickening jolt followed—the nose gear jammed hard into its door. Suddenly, what had begun as a routine test flight spiraled into a high-stakes emergency. Attempts to lower the gear via the primary hydraulic system failed. Switching to the backup electrical system, Cotton heard a sharp pop. Dead. The system was gone. A belly landing wasn’t just risky—it was impossible. The Valkyrie's long, elegant nose and wide intake geometry left no clearance for such a maneuver. North American engineers hadn’t even simulated one. White tried a desperate move—bringing the XB-70 down for a touch-and-go, hoping the impact would jar the gear free. Nothing. He tried again. Still jammed. Options were running out. Bailing out and sacrificing the $750 million prototype loomed as the only choice. But there was fuel to burn, and hope to chase. As engineers on the ground scrambled through diagrams and wiring charts, White and Cotton circled above Edwards Air Force Base, each minute ratcheting up the pressure. Cotton crawled to the rear of the cockpit, opening service panels and probing systems like a surgeon mid-flight. After more than an hour of diagnosis—and nearly two hours in the air—the culprit was found: a tripped circuit breaker. But fixing it was another problem. The Valkyrie had no onboard toolkit. Yet Cotton had brought his briefcase. Inside—an unlikely hero—a paperclip. He straightened it, gripped it with a leather glove, and carefully reached in. ZAP! The breaker came to life. White hit the switch—and the nose gear extended. It worked. Cotton dropped back into his seat, exhausted but victorious. The drama wasn't over. When the Valkyrie finally came down at 173 knots, the earlier malfunction showed its final consequence: hydraulic pressure had stayed locked on three of the four main wheel brakes. As the tires touched down, they couldn’t spin. The result was catastrophic—intense friction ignited the rubber, and the XB-70's massive landing gear tires erupted in flames. The main gear bogies were severely damaged. Still, the plane remained upright. The Valkyrie lived to fly again—though it would take two weeks to repair the scorched gear. It was a steep price, but far better than losing a one-of-a-kind marvel of engineering. It took me a several hours to restore and upscale the archive video enjoy! No sound.

Puddle Jumper 🦨

248,771 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dango's epoch 2 finished in 22 hours, there are easy points to grab, so here's my post (I said yesterday that I was going to do it I'v made a short vdo to show the whole protocol, and a quick presentation below. dango🍡 is a L1 built from scratch with a proper on-chain CLOB for spot + perps. If you're a r€tarded bro looking for money, just remember that it's a promising new Perp-DEX. ➜ The Airdrop: - Log in - Deposit at least $10 to activate your account, - Trade or LP, earn points. EZ. And yes, the more volume you make, the more you earn. ~50% of total $DNG supply is going straight to the community through points. Maybe more like 60 to 70%, I'm sharing with you an interview of the founder below, done what you want... TGE targeted for Q4 2026, so we've got time to farm properly. But if the hype cook, points will be diluted as the weeks go by, it's always easier to accumulate them at the beginning (remember Hyperliquid). [ Testnet participants and Galxe folks gonna be eligible too, and will have '' major advantage ''.] ➜ How the points works: 1 million points every week. 1️⃣ 750k split between perps traders (volume + OI driven) 2️⃣ 250k for vault/DLP depositors You also rack up lootboxes as you trade: bronze every $25k volume, silver $100k, gold $250k, crystal $500k. Those open into NFTs with hidden point multipliers that will matter when the program ends. ➜ Rankings right now: Because it's still early, you don't need massive volume to place well. Consistent activity gets you into top 1000 pretty easily. Top 100 takes more obviously, but the bar isn't crazy high yet compared to older platforms. ➜ Team and backing: Team is legit and known. The founder, Larry0x is a former smart contract developer at Delphi Digital and was heavily involved with Mars Protocol + Left Curve Software, proper Cosmos builders. They raised $3.6M from Hack VC, Lemniscap, Delphi... _____ And that's it.. my strategy is simple, farm max points during first weeks, as long as it's simple, then I'll advise according to how the project develops. I'm currently testing a solution for easy volume, I'm waiting for the full results and I'll share it tomorrow 😉
1:30

Dango's epoch 2 finished in 22 hours, there are easy points to grab, so here's my post (I said yesterday that I was going to do it I'v made a short vdo to show the whole protocol, and a quick presentation below. dango🍡 is a L1 built from scratch with a proper on-chain CLOB for spot + perps. If you're a r€tarded bro looking for money, just remember that it's a promising new Perp-DEX. ➜ The Airdrop: - Log in - Deposit at least $10 to activate your account, - Trade or LP, earn points. EZ. And yes, the more volume you make, the more you earn. ~50% of total $DNG supply is going straight to the community through points. Maybe more like 60 to 70%, I'm sharing with you an interview of the founder below, done what you want... TGE targeted for Q4 2026, so we've got time to farm properly. But if the hype cook, points will be diluted as the weeks go by, it's always easier to accumulate them at the beginning (remember Hyperliquid). [ Testnet participants and Galxe folks gonna be eligible too, and will have '' major advantage ''.] ➜ How the points works: 1 million points every week. 1️⃣ 750k split between perps traders (volume + OI driven) 2️⃣ 250k for vault/DLP depositors You also rack up lootboxes as you trade: bronze every $25k volume, silver $100k, gold $250k, crystal $500k. Those open into NFTs with hidden point multipliers that will matter when the program ends. ➜ Rankings right now: Because it's still early, you don't need massive volume to place well. Consistent activity gets you into top 1000 pretty easily. Top 100 takes more obviously, but the bar isn't crazy high yet compared to older platforms. ➜ Team and backing: Team is legit and known. The founder, Larry0x is a former smart contract developer at Delphi Digital and was heavily involved with Mars Protocol + Left Curve Software, proper Cosmos builders. They raised $3.6M from Hack VC, Lemniscap, Delphi... _____ And that's it.. my strategy is simple, farm max points during first weeks, as long as it's simple, then I'll advise according to how the project develops. I'm currently testing a solution for easy volume, I'm waiting for the full results and I'll share it tomorrow 😉

𝗙𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲

44,071 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨EXPOSED: How Tyler Bowyer is ALLEGEDLY Using TPUSA Donor Money to SEIZE the Utility that Stole His FAMILY'S Land. Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of Turning Point Action Tyler Bowyer is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing Turning Point Action's donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta with the SRP (Salt River Project) and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. Myself and MIA have been pulling countless court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and corporate filings. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of Turning Point USA donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. 🚨 THE BIGGEST POLITICAL HEIST IN AMERICA IS BEING RUN BY ONE MAN, AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT. 🚨 Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of a massive conservative PAC is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing the Turning Point PAC (Turning Point Action) donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta, potentially orchestrate a massive real estate payday for his own family, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. And he is trampling on the memory of the movement's founder to do it. We have spent weeks pulling court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and photographs. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of PAC donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. PART 2: THE 20-YEAR VENDETTA & THE "EASEMENT" PAYOFF [THE FACTS]:Tyler Bowyer omitted a massive, damning conflict of interest from the press and his donors. His grandfather, Ray Leonard Bowyer, worked for SRP for 25 years in the Water Operations Division. But it gets much darker. We pulled Maricopa County Superior Court minute entries and legal notices (Case No. CV2005-003419). In 2005, SRP filed an Eminent Domain lawsuit against Ray L. Bowyer, acting as the Trustee of his family’s trust. SRP forcefully condemned and seized Parcel No. 304-64-010B from the Bowyer family. U.S. Home Corp (a massive developer) was a co-defendant. The court minute entries reveal a legal slaughter: SRP aggressively changed judges right out of the gate. At the final hearing, SRP brought their top Senior Engineer, Freddie Dobbins Jr., to testify to the "necessity" of taking the land. The Bowyer family didn't even show up. They were unrepresented and steamrolled by the utility's legal machine. Crucially, the court records we have obtained thus far do not specify whether SRP used eminent domain to seize the full property outright, or if they only took a portion of it by forcing an "easement" across the land. [THE SPECULATION]:SRP didn't just take a piece of dirt; they destroyed a multi-million dollar family real estate deal. If SRP only forced an easement, the Bowyer family trust is still legally and financially tethered to that land. We theorize that Tyler Bowyer is weaponizing millions in unsuspecting PAC donor money to execute a hostile takeover of the utility that humiliated his family. If his slate wins, his family will be sitting across the negotiating table from people he put in power. That board can authorize massive payouts to buy the rest of the land, renegotiate the easement terms, or route new infrastructure through it. Tyler Bowyer's family could come out with a huge, undisclosed real estate payday funded by the very utility he is taking over. PART 3: THE TROJAN HORSE [THE FACTS]:Look at the top of the ticket that Bowyer's PAC endorsed. He is pushing Chris Dobson for SRP President. Chris Dobson is not a grassroots outsider—he is the current Vice President of the Salt River Project. [THE SPECULATION]:This is a corporate inside job. Bowyer isn't fighting the establishment; he is buying the boardroom. He is laundering political influence through his PAC to elevate the ultimate company insider, turning a public-private utility into a captive asset. PART 4: THE ULTIMATE DISRESPECT (THE MEMORIAL EXPLOITATION) [THE FACTS]:On September 21, 2025, a memorial was held in Glendale for Charlie Kirk. Photographs from the event show that Turning Point Action set up voter registration booths right at the memorial. The booths featured massive banners reading "CHARLIE WANTS YOU TO REGISTER TO VOTE" and were actively used to register attendees for the obscure SRP board elections. [THE SPECULATION]:This is where the moral bankruptcy of this syndicate is fully exposed. It is wrong on so many levels. While everyday conservatives and loved ones were mourning the tragic loss of a movement leader, Tyler Bowyer and TPAction were exploiting the crowd. Instead of worrying about memorializing Charlie with the respect he deserved, they were concerned with selling merch and using a funeral as a voter-harvesting event for their corporate utility takeover. They hijacked a tragedy to fund a family vendetta. PART 5: THE DOUBLE PAYOFF (THE SLUSH FUNDS) If Bowyer successfully uses Turning Point Donor money to win this board, he doesn't just get revenge—he unlocks two massive, multi-million dollar slush funds for his allies. PAYOUT 1: THE GRID [THE FACTS]: Erika Kirk (CEO of TPUSA) has a mother named Lori Frantzve. Lori Frantzve is the CEO of AZ Tech International and G-TEK Industries. Her specialty? EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) protection and grid hardening. She has formally pitched the Arizona State Legislature on this exact need. [THE SPECULATION]: The newly installed, Bowyer-controlled board could turn around and award massive, multi-million dollar "Grid Hardening" contracts directly to the mother of TPUSA’s CEO. PAYOUT 2: THE 20-YEAR FORESTRY EMPIRE [THE FACTS]: We pulled a 2019 U.S. Senate Committee Statement regarding SRP. SRP doesn't just manage water; they heavily influence the management of a 13,000 square-mile watershed spanning five national forests. The document reveals that SRP signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) ensuring they get to "participate in the development... and review the selected contractors" for massive 20-year federal forest thinning projects. Just clearing the tiny Cragin watershed alone is estimated at $27 million. Furthermore, SRP lobbies for contracts to be paid out based on "avoided costs" (hypothetical prevented disaster savings) rather than the actual value of timber removed. [THE SPECULATION]: Whoever controls the SRP board controls the gatekeeping for 20-year federal forestry contracts. This is the ultimate untraceable government payout. Tyler Bowyer's syndicate can funnel tens of millions in federal land management contracts to allied construction and clearing firms using these "cost avoidance" metrics. PART 6: THE CORPORATE ARCHITECTURE & THE MORMON MAFIA [THE FACTS]:The Farnsworth family is a deeply entrenched network in Mesa, Arizona, and they provide the connective tissue for this entire operation: Jessica A. Farnsworth is currently a Process Analyst inside SRP. Chase Farnsworth is a Project Development Executive at Mortenson (a massive commercial construction firm), publicly monitoring and praising SRP's water releases. Dwayne Farnsworth is a corporate agent located right on Dobson Road. [THE SPECULATION]:To execute a takeover this large and route billions in grid hardening and federal forestry contracts, you need insiders, corporate builders, and legislative muscle. The Farnsworth network provides the architecture for Bowyer to move the money once the board is captured. THE BOTTOM LINE Conservative donors thought they were funding a grassroots PAC to save America. Instead, the evidence suggests their money is being used by Tyler Bowyer as a personal slush fund to execute a 20-year-old real estate revenge plot, launder political power for utility insiders, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in federal forestry and grid resilience contracts. And they are willing to step over Charlie's memorial to do it. The movement has been hijacked by one man running a corporate syndicate. It's time to follow the money, audit the grid contracts, and subpoena the watershed MOAs. 🇺🇸⚓️ Huge shoutout to the AMAZING MIA Who who teamed uop with me on this MASSIVE story. She's one of the best researchers out there and everyone should be FOLLOWING her!
4:26

🚨EXPOSED: How Tyler Bowyer is ALLEGEDLY Using TPUSA Donor Money to SEIZE the Utility that Stole His FAMILY'S Land. Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of Turning Point Action Tyler Bowyer is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing Turning Point Action's donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta with the SRP (Salt River Project) and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. Myself and MIA have been pulling countless court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and corporate filings. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of Turning Point USA donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. 🚨 THE BIGGEST POLITICAL HEIST IN AMERICA IS BEING RUN BY ONE MAN, AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT. 🚨 Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of a massive conservative PAC is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing the Turning Point PAC (Turning Point Action) donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta, potentially orchestrate a massive real estate payday for his own family, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. And he is trampling on the memory of the movement's founder to do it. We have spent weeks pulling court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and photographs. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of PAC donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. PART 2: THE 20-YEAR VENDETTA & THE "EASEMENT" PAYOFF [THE FACTS]:Tyler Bowyer omitted a massive, damning conflict of interest from the press and his donors. His grandfather, Ray Leonard Bowyer, worked for SRP for 25 years in the Water Operations Division. But it gets much darker. We pulled Maricopa County Superior Court minute entries and legal notices (Case No. CV2005-003419). In 2005, SRP filed an Eminent Domain lawsuit against Ray L. Bowyer, acting as the Trustee of his family’s trust. SRP forcefully condemned and seized Parcel No. 304-64-010B from the Bowyer family. U.S. Home Corp (a massive developer) was a co-defendant. The court minute entries reveal a legal slaughter: SRP aggressively changed judges right out of the gate. At the final hearing, SRP brought their top Senior Engineer, Freddie Dobbins Jr., to testify to the "necessity" of taking the land. The Bowyer family didn't even show up. They were unrepresented and steamrolled by the utility's legal machine. Crucially, the court records we have obtained thus far do not specify whether SRP used eminent domain to seize the full property outright, or if they only took a portion of it by forcing an "easement" across the land. [THE SPECULATION]:SRP didn't just take a piece of dirt; they destroyed a multi-million dollar family real estate deal. If SRP only forced an easement, the Bowyer family trust is still legally and financially tethered to that land. We theorize that Tyler Bowyer is weaponizing millions in unsuspecting PAC donor money to execute a hostile takeover of the utility that humiliated his family. If his slate wins, his family will be sitting across the negotiating table from people he put in power. That board can authorize massive payouts to buy the rest of the land, renegotiate the easement terms, or route new infrastructure through it. Tyler Bowyer's family could come out with a huge, undisclosed real estate payday funded by the very utility he is taking over. PART 3: THE TROJAN HORSE [THE FACTS]:Look at the top of the ticket that Bowyer's PAC endorsed. He is pushing Chris Dobson for SRP President. Chris Dobson is not a grassroots outsider—he is the current Vice President of the Salt River Project. [THE SPECULATION]:This is a corporate inside job. Bowyer isn't fighting the establishment; he is buying the boardroom. He is laundering political influence through his PAC to elevate the ultimate company insider, turning a public-private utility into a captive asset. PART 4: THE ULTIMATE DISRESPECT (THE MEMORIAL EXPLOITATION) [THE FACTS]:On September 21, 2025, a memorial was held in Glendale for Charlie Kirk. Photographs from the event show that Turning Point Action set up voter registration booths right at the memorial. The booths featured massive banners reading "CHARLIE WANTS YOU TO REGISTER TO VOTE" and were actively used to register attendees for the obscure SRP board elections. [THE SPECULATION]:This is where the moral bankruptcy of this syndicate is fully exposed. It is wrong on so many levels. While everyday conservatives and loved ones were mourning the tragic loss of a movement leader, Tyler Bowyer and TPAction were exploiting the crowd. Instead of worrying about memorializing Charlie with the respect he deserved, they were concerned with selling merch and using a funeral as a voter-harvesting event for their corporate utility takeover. They hijacked a tragedy to fund a family vendetta. PART 5: THE DOUBLE PAYOFF (THE SLUSH FUNDS) If Bowyer successfully uses Turning Point Donor money to win this board, he doesn't just get revenge—he unlocks two massive, multi-million dollar slush funds for his allies. PAYOUT 1: THE GRID [THE FACTS]: Erika Kirk (CEO of TPUSA) has a mother named Lori Frantzve. Lori Frantzve is the CEO of AZ Tech International and G-TEK Industries. Her specialty? EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) protection and grid hardening. She has formally pitched the Arizona State Legislature on this exact need. [THE SPECULATION]: The newly installed, Bowyer-controlled board could turn around and award massive, multi-million dollar "Grid Hardening" contracts directly to the mother of TPUSA’s CEO. PAYOUT 2: THE 20-YEAR FORESTRY EMPIRE [THE FACTS]: We pulled a 2019 U.S. Senate Committee Statement regarding SRP. SRP doesn't just manage water; they heavily influence the management of a 13,000 square-mile watershed spanning five national forests. The document reveals that SRP signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) ensuring they get to "participate in the development... and review the selected contractors" for massive 20-year federal forest thinning projects. Just clearing the tiny Cragin watershed alone is estimated at $27 million. Furthermore, SRP lobbies for contracts to be paid out based on "avoided costs" (hypothetical prevented disaster savings) rather than the actual value of timber removed. [THE SPECULATION]: Whoever controls the SRP board controls the gatekeeping for 20-year federal forestry contracts. This is the ultimate untraceable government payout. Tyler Bowyer's syndicate can funnel tens of millions in federal land management contracts to allied construction and clearing firms using these "cost avoidance" metrics. PART 6: THE CORPORATE ARCHITECTURE & THE MORMON MAFIA [THE FACTS]:The Farnsworth family is a deeply entrenched network in Mesa, Arizona, and they provide the connective tissue for this entire operation: Jessica A. Farnsworth is currently a Process Analyst inside SRP. Chase Farnsworth is a Project Development Executive at Mortenson (a massive commercial construction firm), publicly monitoring and praising SRP's water releases. Dwayne Farnsworth is a corporate agent located right on Dobson Road. [THE SPECULATION]:To execute a takeover this large and route billions in grid hardening and federal forestry contracts, you need insiders, corporate builders, and legislative muscle. The Farnsworth network provides the architecture for Bowyer to move the money once the board is captured. THE BOTTOM LINE Conservative donors thought they were funding a grassroots PAC to save America. Instead, the evidence suggests their money is being used by Tyler Bowyer as a personal slush fund to execute a 20-year-old real estate revenge plot, launder political power for utility insiders, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in federal forestry and grid resilience contracts. And they are willing to step over Charlie's memorial to do it. The movement has been hijacked by one man running a corporate syndicate. It's time to follow the money, audit the grid contracts, and subpoena the watershed MOAs. 🇺🇸⚓️ Huge shoutout to the AMAZING MIA Who who teamed uop with me on this MASSIVE story. She's one of the best researchers out there and everyone should be FOLLOWING her!

Project Constitution

129,996 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Alleged Secret Conference Call [alleged] At 1:34 a.m. on Thursday morning, Christmas Day, while markets were closed, six powerful figures in global finance reportedly held a 47-minute conference call. The participants included the Global Head of Commodities at JPMorgan, the Head of Derivatives Trading at HSBC, the CEO of the CME Group, a senior U.S. Treasury official, the representative for the Bank for International Settlements, and the chairman of the London Bullion Market Association. No official record or press release was made. The narrator claims a source on the call sent a message at 3:15 a.m. saying simply, “They agreed $75.” This was described as an emergency summit to prevent silver from crossing $75, a price level allegedly capable of triggering systemic collapse due to massive exposures in call options. $75 Is the Critical Line There are said to be 41,000 open call option contracts at the $75 strike price, expiring in January 2026, representing 205 million ounces of total exposure. Banks reportedly sold these options when silver was around $50, collecting premiums without proper hedging. At prices around $71-72, the banks remain comfortably hedged. However, if silver breaks and holds above $75 for more than 48 hours, delta hedging requirements would explode, potentially requiring 180 to 200 million ounces. With COMEX registered inventory at only about 24.8 million ounces, London withdrawals restricted, and ETFs frozen, delivery would become impossible, leading to price gaps toward $80, $85, and then $100 in a death spiral. The alleged agreement - a gentleman’s deal for coordinated selling to maintain a ceiling at $75, with regulatory cover and unlimited liquidity backstop from the BIS. What Happened on the Call The call was scheduled at 1:34 a.m. Eastern Time to avoid detection. The CME CEO reportedly opened by saying silver was refusing to stay down—they had smashed it to $70.16 earlier, but buyers rallied it back to $71.69, leaving it only $3.31 from the $75 strike. Volatility was too high, and a snap to $75 would force buying of 180 million ounces they could not deliver. A hard ceiling at $75 was needed. The JPMorgan executive spoke next, noting they were short about 35% of the contracts and already bleeding at $71.69, facing potential $500 million losses in 24 hours if $75 was breached. Coordinated action was essential. The Treasury official sounded urgent, viewing $100 silver as a macro threat signaling loss of confidence in the dollar, and offered support for stabilization efforts within legal parameters—interpreted by the narrator as permission to do whatever was needed. The deal involved coordinated selling whenever silver approached $73, political pressure on ETFs to halt buying, and unlimited dollar liquidity from the BIS for any bank in trouble. The call ended around 2:21 a.m. The Cap in Action On Wednesday, December 24, Christmas Eve, silver reached a high of $72.75 before a midnight dump crashed it to $70.16 in an attempt to break $70 support and induce panic. Physical buyers stepped in, rallying it back to close around $71.69. The narrator calls this a failed execution of the alleged plan, not random volatility. With markets reopening on Friday, December 26, a coordinated media campaign was expected, with experts claiming silver was overbought and demand slowing to discourage holders. Why the Cap Will Fail Banks can coordinate paper selling and print dollars, but they cannot create physical silver. There is a real 1.1 billion ounce annual deficit, refineries remain constrained, and crucially, Shanghai buyers are bidding massive premiums, purchasing physical at equivalent prices around $80 while dismissing paper games. As long as this arbitrage persists, physical will drain paper dry. JPMorgan, HSBC, and Scotia Mocatta pretending to cooperate, but bankers follow a prisoner’s dilemma. All are heavily short and losing money. If one covers, the price skyrockets, bankrupting the others
8:30

The Alleged Secret Conference Call [alleged] At 1:34 a.m. on Thursday morning, Christmas Day, while markets were closed, six powerful figures in global finance reportedly held a 47-minute conference call. The participants included the Global Head of Commodities at JPMorgan, the Head of Derivatives Trading at HSBC, the CEO of the CME Group, a senior U.S. Treasury official, the representative for the Bank for International Settlements, and the chairman of the London Bullion Market Association. No official record or press release was made. The narrator claims a source on the call sent a message at 3:15 a.m. saying simply, “They agreed $75.” This was described as an emergency summit to prevent silver from crossing $75, a price level allegedly capable of triggering systemic collapse due to massive exposures in call options. $75 Is the Critical Line There are said to be 41,000 open call option contracts at the $75 strike price, expiring in January 2026, representing 205 million ounces of total exposure. Banks reportedly sold these options when silver was around $50, collecting premiums without proper hedging. At prices around $71-72, the banks remain comfortably hedged. However, if silver breaks and holds above $75 for more than 48 hours, delta hedging requirements would explode, potentially requiring 180 to 200 million ounces. With COMEX registered inventory at only about 24.8 million ounces, London withdrawals restricted, and ETFs frozen, delivery would become impossible, leading to price gaps toward $80, $85, and then $100 in a death spiral. The alleged agreement - a gentleman’s deal for coordinated selling to maintain a ceiling at $75, with regulatory cover and unlimited liquidity backstop from the BIS. What Happened on the Call The call was scheduled at 1:34 a.m. Eastern Time to avoid detection. The CME CEO reportedly opened by saying silver was refusing to stay down—they had smashed it to $70.16 earlier, but buyers rallied it back to $71.69, leaving it only $3.31 from the $75 strike. Volatility was too high, and a snap to $75 would force buying of 180 million ounces they could not deliver. A hard ceiling at $75 was needed. The JPMorgan executive spoke next, noting they were short about 35% of the contracts and already bleeding at $71.69, facing potential $500 million losses in 24 hours if $75 was breached. Coordinated action was essential. The Treasury official sounded urgent, viewing $100 silver as a macro threat signaling loss of confidence in the dollar, and offered support for stabilization efforts within legal parameters—interpreted by the narrator as permission to do whatever was needed. The deal involved coordinated selling whenever silver approached $73, political pressure on ETFs to halt buying, and unlimited dollar liquidity from the BIS for any bank in trouble. The call ended around 2:21 a.m. The Cap in Action On Wednesday, December 24, Christmas Eve, silver reached a high of $72.75 before a midnight dump crashed it to $70.16 in an attempt to break $70 support and induce panic. Physical buyers stepped in, rallying it back to close around $71.69. The narrator calls this a failed execution of the alleged plan, not random volatility. With markets reopening on Friday, December 26, a coordinated media campaign was expected, with experts claiming silver was overbought and demand slowing to discourage holders. Why the Cap Will Fail Banks can coordinate paper selling and print dollars, but they cannot create physical silver. There is a real 1.1 billion ounce annual deficit, refineries remain constrained, and crucially, Shanghai buyers are bidding massive premiums, purchasing physical at equivalent prices around $80 while dismissing paper games. As long as this arbitrage persists, physical will drain paper dry. JPMorgan, HSBC, and Scotia Mocatta pretending to cooperate, but bankers follow a prisoner’s dilemma. All are heavily short and losing money. If one covers, the price skyrockets, bankrupting the others

@mcm_ct_usa

311,892 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

💰 A TRADER just ROBBED POLYMARKET for $600,000! Started with ONLY $500 and EXPLOITED the BITCOIN PRICE DELAY - placing bets BEFORE the odds UPDATED! $500 → $600K in hours PURE GENIUS HACK! Who’s NEXT?! Trader Turns $500 into $600,000 on Polymarket in Hours – The Bitcoin Price Delay “Life Hack” That’s Going Viral A mysterious trader may have just pulled off what many in the crypto world are calling the ultimate prediction‑market coup — turning a modest $500 into roughly $600,000 in a single session by exploiting a subtle timing gap in Bitcoin price updates on Polymarket. Social posts that have erupted across X today describe how the trader repeatedly capitalised on a tiny latency in Polymarket’s short‑term Bitcoin markets, placing bets a split second before the platform adjusted prices to reflect real‑time market moves. How the “Glitch in the Matrix” Worked Polymarket’s popular ultra‑short “Bitcoin Up or Down” markets, which resolve in 5‑ or 15‑minute intervals, pull price data from major exchanges such as Binance. There is a slight delay — typically a few hundred milliseconds to a couple of seconds — between live exchange price movements and when those changes are reflected in Polymarket’s odds. According to observers, the trader (widely believed to be operating an automated bot) exploited this delay by watching the live price on external feeds, submitting bets on the direction of Bitcoin before Polymarket’s internal prices had fully adjusted, and repeating the process many times in rapid succession. One viral post captured the dynamic this way: “He was seeing the move a fraction of a second earlier, basically seeing the future. He entered positions before Polymarket odds could adjust. Over and over again. Not luck. Just speed.” Another read: “This is a man who found a glitch in the matrix and ran it until someone noticed.” Screenshots and wallet growth charts circulating online show an account balance rocketing from an initial $500 to mid‑six figures over a few hours, a dramatic ascent that has captured widespread attention. Not the First Time — But Still Wildly Profitable Polymarket has previously acknowledged the challenges of ultra‑short crypto markets and in early 2026 introduced dynamic fees intended to reduce latency arbitrage opportunities. The recent run suggests either the fix was incomplete or the trader has found a new way to capture fleeting price disparities faster than the protocol can adjust. Importantly, this was not a smart‑contract exploit or a rug pull. The activity described aligns with classic high‑frequency trading principles: exploit microsecond advantages in price information and execution. On Wall Street, quant funds have built entire businesses around similar edges. Here, that edge allegedly appeared accessible to an individual with sufficiently fast infrastructure. The Internet’s Reaction The story has ignited discussion across X, with both Russian and English accounts sharing wallet screenshots and short videos of the trades. Commentary ranges from admiration to criticism of the Polymarket mechanism. One widely shared post states: “A trader found a loophole and robbed the bookmaker Polymarket for $600,000. He exploited the delay in Bitcoin price updates… Started with just $500.” Replies to that thread span “genius” and “Polymarket is cooked,” reflecting a split between those whispering admiration for the execution and those questioning the sustainability of the platform’s design. Whether Polymarket will attempt to retroactively claw back profits, adjust rules or simply patch the vulnerability again remains unsettled. For the moment, the anonymous trader is alternately being hailed as a folk hero and criticised as a parasite of an imperfect system. Moral of the Story In prediction markets where time and information intersect, speed can be money. Today’s episode may turn into a cautionary tale about the refinement of oracle feeds and the race to eliminate latency advantages — or it may become part of crypto folklore, a dramatic demonstration of how imperfect markets can be bent by those who read the technical seams most closely.
0:23

💰 A TRADER just ROBBED POLYMARKET for $600,000! Started with ONLY $500 and EXPLOITED the BITCOIN PRICE DELAY - placing bets BEFORE the odds UPDATED! $500 → $600K in hours PURE GENIUS HACK! Who’s NEXT?! Trader Turns $500 into $600,000 on Polymarket in Hours – The Bitcoin Price Delay “Life Hack” That’s Going Viral A mysterious trader may have just pulled off what many in the crypto world are calling the ultimate prediction‑market coup — turning a modest $500 into roughly $600,000 in a single session by exploiting a subtle timing gap in Bitcoin price updates on Polymarket. Social posts that have erupted across X today describe how the trader repeatedly capitalised on a tiny latency in Polymarket’s short‑term Bitcoin markets, placing bets a split second before the platform adjusted prices to reflect real‑time market moves. How the “Glitch in the Matrix” Worked Polymarket’s popular ultra‑short “Bitcoin Up or Down” markets, which resolve in 5‑ or 15‑minute intervals, pull price data from major exchanges such as Binance. There is a slight delay — typically a few hundred milliseconds to a couple of seconds — between live exchange price movements and when those changes are reflected in Polymarket’s odds. According to observers, the trader (widely believed to be operating an automated bot) exploited this delay by watching the live price on external feeds, submitting bets on the direction of Bitcoin before Polymarket’s internal prices had fully adjusted, and repeating the process many times in rapid succession. One viral post captured the dynamic this way: “He was seeing the move a fraction of a second earlier, basically seeing the future. He entered positions before Polymarket odds could adjust. Over and over again. Not luck. Just speed.” Another read: “This is a man who found a glitch in the matrix and ran it until someone noticed.” Screenshots and wallet growth charts circulating online show an account balance rocketing from an initial $500 to mid‑six figures over a few hours, a dramatic ascent that has captured widespread attention. Not the First Time — But Still Wildly Profitable Polymarket has previously acknowledged the challenges of ultra‑short crypto markets and in early 2026 introduced dynamic fees intended to reduce latency arbitrage opportunities. The recent run suggests either the fix was incomplete or the trader has found a new way to capture fleeting price disparities faster than the protocol can adjust. Importantly, this was not a smart‑contract exploit or a rug pull. The activity described aligns with classic high‑frequency trading principles: exploit microsecond advantages in price information and execution. On Wall Street, quant funds have built entire businesses around similar edges. Here, that edge allegedly appeared accessible to an individual with sufficiently fast infrastructure. The Internet’s Reaction The story has ignited discussion across X, with both Russian and English accounts sharing wallet screenshots and short videos of the trades. Commentary ranges from admiration to criticism of the Polymarket mechanism. One widely shared post states: “A trader found a loophole and robbed the bookmaker Polymarket for $600,000. He exploited the delay in Bitcoin price updates… Started with just $500.” Replies to that thread span “genius” and “Polymarket is cooked,” reflecting a split between those whispering admiration for the execution and those questioning the sustainability of the platform’s design. Whether Polymarket will attempt to retroactively claw back profits, adjust rules or simply patch the vulnerability again remains unsettled. For the moment, the anonymous trader is alternately being hailed as a folk hero and criticised as a parasite of an imperfect system. Moral of the Story In prediction markets where time and information intersect, speed can be money. Today’s episode may turn into a cautionary tale about the refinement of oracle feeds and the race to eliminate latency advantages — or it may become part of crypto folklore, a dramatic demonstration of how imperfect markets can be bent by those who read the technical seams most closely.

Russian Market

36,649 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Election officials blow the lid off of the massive amount of deliberate and orchestrated FRAUD during the 2020 Election in Michigan. This tells you everything you need to know about our elections. JESSE JACOB: Claimed she was instructed by supervisors to backdate absentee ballot packages and ignore verification protocols, violating Michigan's Election Officials Manual. She observed widespread disregard for deadlines, signatures, and voter eligibility, leading to the processing of invalid ballots. At the TCF Center on November 4, 2020, she was told to enter false receipt dates and skip checks on problematic ballots, feeling harassed when she resisted. - Estimated 10,000–15,000 ballot packages prepared daily from September 22–30, 2020 (about 10 days), totaling around 100,000 false documents backdated by 3 days. - Handled 25,000–30,000 illegal second ballots across 23 satellite sites, issued without affidavits or returning originals. - Examined approximately 25,000 ballots over 1.5 days at TCF Center, with no Republican inspectors present. - Ballots issued after the November 2, 2020, 4:00 PM deadline (e.g., dated November 3) were backdated to November 2. MELISSA CARONE: Alleged she saw city workers repeatedly scanning the same batches of ballots without proper procedures, causing overcounts due to machine jams. She reported a data loss incident dismissed by her manager and claimed vans arrived late at night under the guise of delivering food but actually carrying ballots. She noted a lack of Republican oversight and untrained workers. - Batches of ballots run through tabulators 9–10 times without discarding originals, with jams occurring 2–3 times per hour per machine across 22–24 tabulators, leading to thousands of jams. - Estimated at least 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times. - Poll book off by more than 100,000 entries; turnout rate claimed at 120%. - Only about 3 Republicans observed the process. Trump was allegedly ahead by 100,000 votes before a data loss event. HIMA KOLANAGIREDDY: Described machine jams leading to improper handling of ballots and manual entries of unregistered voters. She claimed Democratic challengers intimidated GOP observers, and poll workers were hostile or untrained. She filed an affidavit with the Election Integrity Fund on November 4, 2020, including specific ballot details. - Tabulator machines jammed 3–4 times per hour; machines showed vote increments of 300–400 instead of resetting to zero. - 50–150 ballots in 2–3 boxes from Goddard Street were manually entered without verification, with birth dates like 1900 and no receipt dates (e.g., "November 0-"). - Sequential ballot numbers (e.g., 2232 followed by 2233) on mail-in ballots, which she claimed should not be sequential. ANDREW SITTO: Alleged theft of duplicate ballots and improper alterations to favor Democrats. He described a late-night delivery of ballots with no Trump votes and claimed challenges were ignored. Access to the counting room was blocked under false pretenses. - Workers stole 3–4 duplicate ballots at a time, with more than half a dozen thefts observed in his first shift and similar in others, estimating 2–3 dozen duplicates mishandled. - Around 4:30 AM on November 4, 2020, approximately 50,000 ballots (boxes of ~600 each) were brought in from the rear entrance. - No Trump votes in a dozen sampled duplicates from his 6:00 AM–2:00 PM shift; only one Trump duplicate seen all night. - Room access blocked at 2:00 PM, citing COVID capacity. COLONEL PHIL WALDRON: Presented evidence of turnout impossibilities, vote spikes exceeding machine capacities, and vulnerabilities in Dominion systems. He cited high error rates and potential foreign interference, referencing affidavits and forensic audits. - 643 precincts with over 80% turnout, 21 over 90%, 10 exactly 100%, and 6 over 120%. - Vote spikes: 16,000 absentee votes by 6:52 AM on November 4; +213,429 more from 6:52–7:49 AM; 56,098 votes in an 8-minute period at 11:15 AM (machines max ~20,000 votes per hour). - Antrim County error rate of 8.3 (exceeding federal limit of 1 in 125,000 by ~750 times); 6,000-vote glitch. - 384,000 votes processed in 2 hours 38 minutes, exceeding capacity (max 100,000 at 2,000 per hour per machine). - 17,327 voters over age 80 who voted, cross-referenced with ~350 pages of obituaries. MONICA PALMER: Highlighted unbalanced precincts and defective ballot containers with broken chains of custody. She noted adjudication bottlenecks and insufficient time for review before certification, recommending more authority for canvassers. - 76% of absentee precincts unbalanced after the primary election. - 71% of counting boards unbalanced without explanation in the general election. - 400 unexplained unbalanced precincts in Wayne County. - Five damaged ballot containers (out of 50 purchased, ~30 defective) with gaps allowing tampering; not recounted. - Corrected voter lists received 13 days post-election, covering multiple precincts. It's time to get rid of all electronic voting machines, 3rd party access, end mail-in voting, and require voter ID and proof of citizenship, and move to paper only voting, or our elections will never be secure.
1:01:11

Election officials blow the lid off of the massive amount of deliberate and orchestrated FRAUD during the 2020 Election in Michigan. This tells you everything you need to know about our elections. JESSE JACOB: Claimed she was instructed by supervisors to backdate absentee ballot packages and ignore verification protocols, violating Michigan's Election Officials Manual. She observed widespread disregard for deadlines, signatures, and voter eligibility, leading to the processing of invalid ballots. At the TCF Center on November 4, 2020, she was told to enter false receipt dates and skip checks on problematic ballots, feeling harassed when she resisted. - Estimated 10,000–15,000 ballot packages prepared daily from September 22–30, 2020 (about 10 days), totaling around 100,000 false documents backdated by 3 days. - Handled 25,000–30,000 illegal second ballots across 23 satellite sites, issued without affidavits or returning originals. - Examined approximately 25,000 ballots over 1.5 days at TCF Center, with no Republican inspectors present. - Ballots issued after the November 2, 2020, 4:00 PM deadline (e.g., dated November 3) were backdated to November 2. MELISSA CARONE: Alleged she saw city workers repeatedly scanning the same batches of ballots without proper procedures, causing overcounts due to machine jams. She reported a data loss incident dismissed by her manager and claimed vans arrived late at night under the guise of delivering food but actually carrying ballots. She noted a lack of Republican oversight and untrained workers. - Batches of ballots run through tabulators 9–10 times without discarding originals, with jams occurring 2–3 times per hour per machine across 22–24 tabulators, leading to thousands of jams. - Estimated at least 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times. - Poll book off by more than 100,000 entries; turnout rate claimed at 120%. - Only about 3 Republicans observed the process. Trump was allegedly ahead by 100,000 votes before a data loss event. HIMA KOLANAGIREDDY: Described machine jams leading to improper handling of ballots and manual entries of unregistered voters. She claimed Democratic challengers intimidated GOP observers, and poll workers were hostile or untrained. She filed an affidavit with the Election Integrity Fund on November 4, 2020, including specific ballot details. - Tabulator machines jammed 3–4 times per hour; machines showed vote increments of 300–400 instead of resetting to zero. - 50–150 ballots in 2–3 boxes from Goddard Street were manually entered without verification, with birth dates like 1900 and no receipt dates (e.g., "November 0-"). - Sequential ballot numbers (e.g., 2232 followed by 2233) on mail-in ballots, which she claimed should not be sequential. ANDREW SITTO: Alleged theft of duplicate ballots and improper alterations to favor Democrats. He described a late-night delivery of ballots with no Trump votes and claimed challenges were ignored. Access to the counting room was blocked under false pretenses. - Workers stole 3–4 duplicate ballots at a time, with more than half a dozen thefts observed in his first shift and similar in others, estimating 2–3 dozen duplicates mishandled. - Around 4:30 AM on November 4, 2020, approximately 50,000 ballots (boxes of ~600 each) were brought in from the rear entrance. - No Trump votes in a dozen sampled duplicates from his 6:00 AM–2:00 PM shift; only one Trump duplicate seen all night. - Room access blocked at 2:00 PM, citing COVID capacity. COLONEL PHIL WALDRON: Presented evidence of turnout impossibilities, vote spikes exceeding machine capacities, and vulnerabilities in Dominion systems. He cited high error rates and potential foreign interference, referencing affidavits and forensic audits. - 643 precincts with over 80% turnout, 21 over 90%, 10 exactly 100%, and 6 over 120%. - Vote spikes: 16,000 absentee votes by 6:52 AM on November 4; +213,429 more from 6:52–7:49 AM; 56,098 votes in an 8-minute period at 11:15 AM (machines max ~20,000 votes per hour). - Antrim County error rate of 8.3 (exceeding federal limit of 1 in 125,000 by ~750 times); 6,000-vote glitch. - 384,000 votes processed in 2 hours 38 minutes, exceeding capacity (max 100,000 at 2,000 per hour per machine). - 17,327 voters over age 80 who voted, cross-referenced with ~350 pages of obituaries. MONICA PALMER: Highlighted unbalanced precincts and defective ballot containers with broken chains of custody. She noted adjudication bottlenecks and insufficient time for review before certification, recommending more authority for canvassers. - 76% of absentee precincts unbalanced after the primary election. - 71% of counting boards unbalanced without explanation in the general election. - 400 unexplained unbalanced precincts in Wayne County. - Five damaged ballot containers (out of 50 purchased, ~30 defective) with gaps allowing tampering; not recounted. - Corrected voter lists received 13 days post-election, covering multiple precincts. It's time to get rid of all electronic voting machines, 3rd party access, end mail-in voting, and require voter ID and proof of citizenship, and move to paper only voting, or our elections will never be secure.

The SCIF

49,978 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Dave Chappelle’s story is one of the rawest examples of what happens when a black genius gets too powerful for the machine to handle—and how he clawed his way out on top. Back in 2003, Chappelle’s Show hit Comedy Central and changed everything. Those sketches—Rick James, Clayton Bigsby, the Racial Draft—weren’t just hilarious; they cut straight through America’s bullshit on race and power. The show blew up, pulling millions of viewers and raking in hundreds of millions from DVDs and reruns. Dave was thirty, suddenly the sharpest voice in comedy. But the deal he’d signed early on gave him almost nothing on the back end. Comedy Central—and its parent Viacom, run by the Redstone family—kept the real money. Dave watched his work get bootlegged and monetized while he got crumbs. Then Season 3 rolled around in 2005. During filming, something felt off. One sketch had a Black character in a pixie costume, and a white executive was laughing a little too hard, in a way that made Dave’s skin crawl. He started telling people privately, “They’re trying to make me wear a dress.” In Hollywood, that’s code for forcing Black men into emasculating roles to diminish their threat—think of the patterns with Eddie Murphy, Martin Lawrence, or countless others. The pressure built. They dangled a $50 million deal for two more seasons. Insane money on paper, but Dave could smell the trap: even less control, more ways to twist his voice into something that served the system instead of exposing it. So he did what almost nobody does—he walked away. Dropped the $50 million, got on a plane, and vanished to South Africa. Stayed on a farm in Durban with a Muslim friend, took a breath, and reflected. The media went feral: “Chappelle’s having a breakdown,” “crack addiction,” “mental health crisis.” Same smear playbook they use on anyone who says no—Kanye, Katt Williams, you name it. Label them crazy, bury the real story. While he was gone, Comedy Central took the unfinished Season 3 footage, slapped it together as “The Lost Episodes,” and aired it anyway. Hosted by Charlie Murphy and Donnell Rawlings, no Dave in sight. They still made bank off his genius, sending a clear message: We own your art even if you run. For years after, Hollywood painted him as difficult, unstable, the guy who “blew” $50 million. Doors quietly closed. No big specials, no major movies. Dave went underground—small clubs, quiet tours—rebuilding on his own terms. Then, around 2016-2017, Netflix came knocking. This time Dave negotiated like a boss: massive paydays—reportedly $20 million per special—full creative control, real ownership. His comeback specials dropped and hit harder than ever. He talked openly about the “dress” incident, the industry’s traps for Black artists, the way they try to break you. In *Sticks & Stones*, he shredded cancel culture. In *The Closer*, he took on the trans debate and refused to bend. The outrage machine came for him full force—walkouts, petitions, headlines screaming “transphobe.” Didn’t matter. Arenas sold out, Grammys won, legacy cemented. And the sweetest part? In 2022, after years of the show being pulled from streaming (Dave had publicly asked platforms not to run it until he got paid fairly), HBO Max finally caved. They cut him a proper check, and Chappelle’s Show came back—with Dave in control. Fast-forward to right now, December 2025: Dave just surprise-dropped his newest Netflix special, The Unstoppable recorded live in his hometown Washington, D.C. back in October. In it, he dives fearless into the chaos of the year—Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Puff Daddy’s downfall, the Riyadh comedy fest backlash, National Guard deployments, free speech crackdowns, and wraps with an epic 30-minute closer weaving American history from Jack Johnson to Nipsey Hussle. Bold truths, no holds barred, and as unstoppable as ever.
1:03

Dave Chappelle’s story is one of the rawest examples of what happens when a black genius gets too powerful for the machine to handle—and how he clawed his way out on top. Back in 2003, Chappelle’s Show hit Comedy Central and changed everything. Those sketches—Rick James, Clayton Bigsby, the Racial Draft—weren’t just hilarious; they cut straight through America’s bullshit on race and power. The show blew up, pulling millions of viewers and raking in hundreds of millions from DVDs and reruns. Dave was thirty, suddenly the sharpest voice in comedy. But the deal he’d signed early on gave him almost nothing on the back end. Comedy Central—and its parent Viacom, run by the Redstone family—kept the real money. Dave watched his work get bootlegged and monetized while he got crumbs. Then Season 3 rolled around in 2005. During filming, something felt off. One sketch had a Black character in a pixie costume, and a white executive was laughing a little too hard, in a way that made Dave’s skin crawl. He started telling people privately, “They’re trying to make me wear a dress.” In Hollywood, that’s code for forcing Black men into emasculating roles to diminish their threat—think of the patterns with Eddie Murphy, Martin Lawrence, or countless others. The pressure built. They dangled a $50 million deal for two more seasons. Insane money on paper, but Dave could smell the trap: even less control, more ways to twist his voice into something that served the system instead of exposing it. So he did what almost nobody does—he walked away. Dropped the $50 million, got on a plane, and vanished to South Africa. Stayed on a farm in Durban with a Muslim friend, took a breath, and reflected. The media went feral: “Chappelle’s having a breakdown,” “crack addiction,” “mental health crisis.” Same smear playbook they use on anyone who says no—Kanye, Katt Williams, you name it. Label them crazy, bury the real story. While he was gone, Comedy Central took the unfinished Season 3 footage, slapped it together as “The Lost Episodes,” and aired it anyway. Hosted by Charlie Murphy and Donnell Rawlings, no Dave in sight. They still made bank off his genius, sending a clear message: We own your art even if you run. For years after, Hollywood painted him as difficult, unstable, the guy who “blew” $50 million. Doors quietly closed. No big specials, no major movies. Dave went underground—small clubs, quiet tours—rebuilding on his own terms. Then, around 2016-2017, Netflix came knocking. This time Dave negotiated like a boss: massive paydays—reportedly $20 million per special—full creative control, real ownership. His comeback specials dropped and hit harder than ever. He talked openly about the “dress” incident, the industry’s traps for Black artists, the way they try to break you. In *Sticks & Stones*, he shredded cancel culture. In *The Closer*, he took on the trans debate and refused to bend. The outrage machine came for him full force—walkouts, petitions, headlines screaming “transphobe.” Didn’t matter. Arenas sold out, Grammys won, legacy cemented. And the sweetest part? In 2022, after years of the show being pulled from streaming (Dave had publicly asked platforms not to run it until he got paid fairly), HBO Max finally caved. They cut him a proper check, and Chappelle’s Show came back—with Dave in control. Fast-forward to right now, December 2025: Dave just surprise-dropped his newest Netflix special, The Unstoppable recorded live in his hometown Washington, D.C. back in October. In it, he dives fearless into the chaos of the year—Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Puff Daddy’s downfall, the Riyadh comedy fest backlash, National Guard deployments, free speech crackdowns, and wraps with an epic 30-minute closer weaving American history from Jack Johnson to Nipsey Hussle. Bold truths, no holds barred, and as unstoppable as ever.

Lance

95,799 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

I Built a 37.0 Profit Factor Bot by Cracking Every TradingView Source Code tradingview is a gold mine hiding in plain sight and i just found the master key to unlock every single secret hidden within its community scripts. most traders spend their entire lives staring at candles and hoping for a miracle while the actual alpha is buried in the open source code that nobody bothers to look at. i used to be that guy who sat there getting liquidated at three in the morning because i thought i could outplay the market with my gut feeling and some drawings on a screen. it turns out that the game is completely rigged against you if you are trading manually but there is a specific way to flip the script. i am going to show you how to stop guessing and start knowing exactly what works across every possible market condition before you ever risk a single dollar. i spent years losing money and thousands on developers because i thought i was not smart enough to code the systems myself but i was wrong. the first step to cracking the market is realizing that every indicator on the super charts has a source code section that is completely open to the public. you can literally scroll through the community scripts and pull the exact logic for thousands of different strategies that people claim are the holy grail of trading. but the secret is not just having the code because most of these indicators are actually garbage that will blow your account up in a week. this is where the real loop opens because you need a way to test these ideas across twenty five different data sets in seconds rather than months. i use a custom setup with ai agents specifically a sub agent i call the backtest architect to handle the heavy lifting of turning pine script into python code. the goal is to create a factory where you can feed in a raw indicator and get back a full report on its expectancy and profit factor without lifting a finger. most people find one strategy and marry it for life but a real data dog knows that you have to iterate to success or you will get left behind. i am running eighty one different backtests right now because i know that ninety percent of what i find will be trash but that remaining ten percent is where the wealth is made. the backtest architect knows exactly how to structure the folders and data paths so that we are testing everything from the base indicator to complex versions with filters. you might think that popular tools like fibonacci or order blocks are the way to go because everyone on social media talks about them like they are law. but when i actually ran the numbers through the machine the results were embarrassing and most of those strategies just resulted in negative expectancy. it is a dangerous trap to follow the crowd into a trade just because some guru said a certain level was important when the data shows it is a coin flip at best. the dynamic swing indicator was one of the few that actually held its weight during the recent massive testing sessions we ran. it was pulling in profit factors of over thirty seven with annualized returns that look too good to be true until you see the trade list. we combined it with filters like the adx and the money flow index to see if we could refine the signals and the results were absolutely staggering. when you have a system that can run through forty data sets while you are drinking tea you realize that manual trading is a form of self harm. i realized this after spending hundreds of thousands on apps and devs only to find out that i could just learn to build these bots myself live on the internet. the speed of iteration is the only thing that matters in this game because the faster you can fail the faster you can find the one strategy that actually prints. one of the biggest hurdles i faced was thinking that i needed to be a math genius or a senior engineer to automate my trading systems. the truth is that code is the great equalizer because it allows a regular person to compete with massive hedge funds by using the same logic and speed. i decided to learn everything in public because i wanted people to see the process of losing money with liquidations and then finally finding a path to automation. the reality of the market is that it moves in cycles and what worked yesterday will almost certainly fail tomorrow unless you are constantly testing. that is why i built the agents to automatically look through the results folder and rank the top performers based on a composite score. it takes all the emotion out of the process because i am no longer looking for a reason to enter a trade i am just looking at a csv file that tells me the truth. if you are still drawing lines on a chart and hoping for the best you are basically playing a game of chance against a high speed casino. the transition from a manual trader to a systems builder is the single most important pivot you will ever make in your life. it is not about being right or wrong it is about having a positive expectancy that has been proven across thousands of trades and multiple years of history. i had to fix a few errors in the short selling logic where the agents were getting confused between maximum and minimum values for take profit levels. these tiny bugs are the difference between a winning system and a blown account so you have to be willing to dive into the code and refine the machine. but once the system is tuned and the sub agents are running it becomes a beautiful workflow that functions entirely without your input. we are currently moving through the editors picks and the trending indicators one by one because i want to have a database of every single strategy on the platform. being a data dog means you never stop searching for that edge and you never settle for a strategy that just looks okay on a single chart. you have to demand excellence from your code because the market will not give you a single inch of mercy if you are lazy with your research. the ultimate goal is to have fully automated systems trading for you so you can focus on scaling rather than staring at a screen for ten hours a day. i am already up to over eighty backtests in this single session and i plan on hitting hundreds more by the end of the week. once you realize that you can crack the code of any indicator you see on the internet you will never look at a chart the same way again. this is the power of using agents to bridge the gap between a raw idea and a finished trading bot that actually works in the real world. i am done with getting liquidated and i am done with the stress of over trading because the code handles everything with cold precision. the path to success is paved with data and if you are not willing to automate your process you are just waiting for your next liquidation to happen
49:49

I Built a 37.0 Profit Factor Bot by Cracking Every TradingView Source Code tradingview is a gold mine hiding in plain sight and i just found the master key to unlock every single secret hidden within its community scripts. most traders spend their entire lives staring at candles and hoping for a miracle while the actual alpha is buried in the open source code that nobody bothers to look at. i used to be that guy who sat there getting liquidated at three in the morning because i thought i could outplay the market with my gut feeling and some drawings on a screen. it turns out that the game is completely rigged against you if you are trading manually but there is a specific way to flip the script. i am going to show you how to stop guessing and start knowing exactly what works across every possible market condition before you ever risk a single dollar. i spent years losing money and thousands on developers because i thought i was not smart enough to code the systems myself but i was wrong. the first step to cracking the market is realizing that every indicator on the super charts has a source code section that is completely open to the public. you can literally scroll through the community scripts and pull the exact logic for thousands of different strategies that people claim are the holy grail of trading. but the secret is not just having the code because most of these indicators are actually garbage that will blow your account up in a week. this is where the real loop opens because you need a way to test these ideas across twenty five different data sets in seconds rather than months. i use a custom setup with ai agents specifically a sub agent i call the backtest architect to handle the heavy lifting of turning pine script into python code. the goal is to create a factory where you can feed in a raw indicator and get back a full report on its expectancy and profit factor without lifting a finger. most people find one strategy and marry it for life but a real data dog knows that you have to iterate to success or you will get left behind. i am running eighty one different backtests right now because i know that ninety percent of what i find will be trash but that remaining ten percent is where the wealth is made. the backtest architect knows exactly how to structure the folders and data paths so that we are testing everything from the base indicator to complex versions with filters. you might think that popular tools like fibonacci or order blocks are the way to go because everyone on social media talks about them like they are law. but when i actually ran the numbers through the machine the results were embarrassing and most of those strategies just resulted in negative expectancy. it is a dangerous trap to follow the crowd into a trade just because some guru said a certain level was important when the data shows it is a coin flip at best. the dynamic swing indicator was one of the few that actually held its weight during the recent massive testing sessions we ran. it was pulling in profit factors of over thirty seven with annualized returns that look too good to be true until you see the trade list. we combined it with filters like the adx and the money flow index to see if we could refine the signals and the results were absolutely staggering. when you have a system that can run through forty data sets while you are drinking tea you realize that manual trading is a form of self harm. i realized this after spending hundreds of thousands on apps and devs only to find out that i could just learn to build these bots myself live on the internet. the speed of iteration is the only thing that matters in this game because the faster you can fail the faster you can find the one strategy that actually prints. one of the biggest hurdles i faced was thinking that i needed to be a math genius or a senior engineer to automate my trading systems. the truth is that code is the great equalizer because it allows a regular person to compete with massive hedge funds by using the same logic and speed. i decided to learn everything in public because i wanted people to see the process of losing money with liquidations and then finally finding a path to automation. the reality of the market is that it moves in cycles and what worked yesterday will almost certainly fail tomorrow unless you are constantly testing. that is why i built the agents to automatically look through the results folder and rank the top performers based on a composite score. it takes all the emotion out of the process because i am no longer looking for a reason to enter a trade i am just looking at a csv file that tells me the truth. if you are still drawing lines on a chart and hoping for the best you are basically playing a game of chance against a high speed casino. the transition from a manual trader to a systems builder is the single most important pivot you will ever make in your life. it is not about being right or wrong it is about having a positive expectancy that has been proven across thousands of trades and multiple years of history. i had to fix a few errors in the short selling logic where the agents were getting confused between maximum and minimum values for take profit levels. these tiny bugs are the difference between a winning system and a blown account so you have to be willing to dive into the code and refine the machine. but once the system is tuned and the sub agents are running it becomes a beautiful workflow that functions entirely without your input. we are currently moving through the editors picks and the trending indicators one by one because i want to have a database of every single strategy on the platform. being a data dog means you never stop searching for that edge and you never settle for a strategy that just looks okay on a single chart. you have to demand excellence from your code because the market will not give you a single inch of mercy if you are lazy with your research. the ultimate goal is to have fully automated systems trading for you so you can focus on scaling rather than staring at a screen for ten hours a day. i am already up to over eighty backtests in this single session and i plan on hitting hundreds more by the end of the week. once you realize that you can crack the code of any indicator you see on the internet you will never look at a chart the same way again. this is the power of using agents to bridge the gap between a raw idea and a finished trading bot that actually works in the real world. i am done with getting liquidated and i am done with the stress of over trading because the code handles everything with cold precision. the path to success is paved with data and if you are not willing to automate your process you are just waiting for your next liquidation to happen

Moon Dev

26,010 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF ELON'S CYBERCAB AND ROBOVAN PRESENTATION 00:00 Welcome 01:16 Cybercab & Future of transportation 04:33 Cost 05:53 Timeline 07:13 Self-driving technology 10:05 Inductive charging 10:24 The cities of the future 11:04 Robovan 12:13 Optimus Welcome Welcome to the We, Robot party. We have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the Robotaxi, the Cybercab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling, there's no people in them. As you can see, the car is just going by with no people. We have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. So you'll see model Y's and the Cybercabs, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the Cybercab. There's no steering wheel or pedals. So I hope this goes well, we'll find out. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. We want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, yes, I wish I could be there now. That's what we want. Cybercab & Future of transportation So, when we think about transport today, there's a lot of pain that we take for granted, that we think is normal. Like having to drive around LA in 3 hours of traffic. Yeah, people that live in LA, I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to another city faster than you can get to LA. And you have to drive the whole way, unless you're in a Tesla. Of course, our Tesla already does quite well at this supervised self-driving. So, supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd who are using that. So, we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. But there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much. I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments, storage of the car, it's very expensive. You say, like, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So, the vast majority of the time cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more, maybe ten times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe ten times as much value. There's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only ten of them are used for driving. And then, a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which can be pretty annoying at times. So, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just, it'll save lives, like a lot of lives and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become ten times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator but once in a while, they get tired and accidentally shear somebody in half. Now, we have automated elevators. You just get an elevator and you press a button and you don't even think about it and it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. That's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car and the time that they will get back that they can now spend, well, I guess, on their phones or watching a movie or doing work or whatever you want to do you can think of the car in autonomous world as being like just little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So, yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Cost So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile, whereas the cost of Cybercab we think probably over time, the operating cost is probably going to be around twenty cents a mile. Including taxes and everything else, it probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. And you will be able to buy one. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there'll be an interesting business model where, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars and like, sort of manage, I don't know, 10, 20 cars and just take care of them. Like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little flock of cars and you're the shepherd and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. Timeline We do expect actually to start fully autonomous unsupervised FSD in Texas and California next year. And that's obviously, that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cybercab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably, I tend to be a little optimistic with time frames, but in 2026. So, yeah, before 2027, let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. But well, before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program and model S and X, too. But the Model 3 and Y will achieve unsupervised full self-driving with permission, in wherever regulators essentially approve it. In the US, and then to follow outside the US. And Cybertruck, too. All our cars are basically, all cars that we make. Let's not get nuanced here. Self-driving technology One of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. It's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see. With that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also, it can see in all directions simultaneously and it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So, it will naturally be, like I said 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human, just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is, AI and vision. So, there's no expensive equipment needed. The Model 3 and Model Y and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy, unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually over-spec the computer for the Cybercab. So, our AI 5 computer will be somewhat over-spec'd because I think there's actually also an opportunity, sort of like an Amazon Web Services, where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left and there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute, where if you've got like a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it so that I think will make sense. So, our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls, and it feels great. So we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here. It's a very big set. So it's like really we've used I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So, it goes on, the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So, it'll be cool and you'll get to experience it tonight. Inductive charging Something we're also doing is and it's really high time we did this is inductive charging. So, the robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, it's kind of how it should be. The cities of the future One of the things that is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in. And when you drive around a city, or when the car drives you around the city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere, parking garages. What would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so, from we're taking the inglot out of parking lot. You're welcome. So, there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So, like, that would be quite fantastic. Robovan Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovan. We're going to make this and it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you? That'd be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. You can configure it for goods transport within a city. Or transport of up to 20 people at a time. The Robovan is what's gonna solve for high density. If you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovan. One of the things we want to do, and we've seen this with the Cybertruck, is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future. Optimus Speaking of robots. Everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gearboxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. The same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. We've made a lot of progress with Optimus. And as you can see, we started up with someone in a robot suit. And then, we've progressed dramatically, year after year. So, if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own. So, you can have your own personal R2-D2-C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000, probably less than a car is my prediction, long-term. It'll take us a minute to get to the long term. But fundamentally, at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for, I think, probably $20,000 to $30,000, long-term. And what can it do? It'll basically do anything you want. It can be a teacher or babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks whatever you can think of, it will do. And, yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind, because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then, they'll be producing products and services. I predict, actually, provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome, look on the bright side, the cup is 80% full, the cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically, anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance the likes of which people have not, almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So now, one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please, please be nice to the Optimus robots. You'll be able to walk right up to them and they'll serve drinks at the bar. I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots and they're there, you're just in front of you. So yeah, with that, let's party!
15:37

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF ELON'S CYBERCAB AND ROBOVAN PRESENTATION 00:00 Welcome 01:16 Cybercab & Future of transportation 04:33 Cost 05:53 Timeline 07:13 Self-driving technology 10:05 Inductive charging 10:24 The cities of the future 11:04 Robovan 12:13 Optimus Welcome Welcome to the We, Robot party. We have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the Robotaxi, the Cybercab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling, there's no people in them. As you can see, the car is just going by with no people. We have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. So you'll see model Y's and the Cybercabs, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the Cybercab. There's no steering wheel or pedals. So I hope this goes well, we'll find out. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. We want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, yes, I wish I could be there now. That's what we want. Cybercab & Future of transportation So, when we think about transport today, there's a lot of pain that we take for granted, that we think is normal. Like having to drive around LA in 3 hours of traffic. Yeah, people that live in LA, I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to another city faster than you can get to LA. And you have to drive the whole way, unless you're in a Tesla. Of course, our Tesla already does quite well at this supervised self-driving. So, supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd who are using that. So, we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. But there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much. I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments, storage of the car, it's very expensive. You say, like, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So, the vast majority of the time cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more, maybe ten times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe ten times as much value. There's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only ten of them are used for driving. And then, a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which can be pretty annoying at times. So, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just, it'll save lives, like a lot of lives and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become ten times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator but once in a while, they get tired and accidentally shear somebody in half. Now, we have automated elevators. You just get an elevator and you press a button and you don't even think about it and it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. That's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car and the time that they will get back that they can now spend, well, I guess, on their phones or watching a movie or doing work or whatever you want to do you can think of the car in autonomous world as being like just little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So, yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Cost So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile, whereas the cost of Cybercab we think probably over time, the operating cost is probably going to be around twenty cents a mile. Including taxes and everything else, it probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. And you will be able to buy one. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there'll be an interesting business model where, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars and like, sort of manage, I don't know, 10, 20 cars and just take care of them. Like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little flock of cars and you're the shepherd and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. Timeline We do expect actually to start fully autonomous unsupervised FSD in Texas and California next year. And that's obviously, that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cybercab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably, I tend to be a little optimistic with time frames, but in 2026. So, yeah, before 2027, let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. But well, before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program and model S and X, too. But the Model 3 and Y will achieve unsupervised full self-driving with permission, in wherever regulators essentially approve it. In the US, and then to follow outside the US. And Cybertruck, too. All our cars are basically, all cars that we make. Let's not get nuanced here. Self-driving technology One of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. It's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see. With that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also, it can see in all directions simultaneously and it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So, it will naturally be, like I said 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human, just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is, AI and vision. So, there's no expensive equipment needed. The Model 3 and Model Y and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy, unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually over-spec the computer for the Cybercab. So, our AI 5 computer will be somewhat over-spec'd because I think there's actually also an opportunity, sort of like an Amazon Web Services, where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left and there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute, where if you've got like a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it so that I think will make sense. So, our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls, and it feels great. So we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here. It's a very big set. So it's like really we've used I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So, it goes on, the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So, it'll be cool and you'll get to experience it tonight. Inductive charging Something we're also doing is and it's really high time we did this is inductive charging. So, the robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, it's kind of how it should be. The cities of the future One of the things that is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in. And when you drive around a city, or when the car drives you around the city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere, parking garages. What would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so, from we're taking the inglot out of parking lot. You're welcome. So, there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So, like, that would be quite fantastic. Robovan Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovan. We're going to make this and it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you? That'd be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. You can configure it for goods transport within a city. Or transport of up to 20 people at a time. The Robovan is what's gonna solve for high density. If you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovan. One of the things we want to do, and we've seen this with the Cybertruck, is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future. Optimus Speaking of robots. Everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gearboxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. The same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. We've made a lot of progress with Optimus. And as you can see, we started up with someone in a robot suit. And then, we've progressed dramatically, year after year. So, if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own. So, you can have your own personal R2-D2-C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000, probably less than a car is my prediction, long-term. It'll take us a minute to get to the long term. But fundamentally, at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for, I think, probably $20,000 to $30,000, long-term. And what can it do? It'll basically do anything you want. It can be a teacher or babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks whatever you can think of, it will do. And, yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind, because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then, they'll be producing products and services. I predict, actually, provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome, look on the bright side, the cup is 80% full, the cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically, anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance the likes of which people have not, almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So now, one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please, please be nice to the Optimus robots. You'll be able to walk right up to them and they'll serve drinks at the bar. I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots and they're there, you're just in front of you. So yeah, with that, let's party!

Mario Nawfal

241,051 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

6⭐️ Hash 🍫🔥 Can YOU Visually tell the Trichomes size of true 6-Star hash perfection⁉️ When it’s oily, and has greasy layers, it’s that flawless full-melt bubble. Pure resin gold with zero residue. This is what the 2026 solventless boom is chasing: elite full-melt hash that vaporizes like ancient medicine, not plant junk. But, can you spot the trichome size and quality just by eye that earns those sacred 6 stars? ✨ In our 28-million-year co-evolution with cannabis, the plants taught us this code. Landrace genetics + proper harvest (milky/early amber) + clean processing = swollen resin factories bursting with terps, cannabinoids, and that legendary oily shine. Quick Visual Star Rating Guide (Trichome Science You Can See): • 1-2⭐ Tiny bulbous glands (10–30μm) or dusty debris → powdery, weak, immature. Burns harsh. • 3⭐ Capitate-sessile heads (25–100μm) → decent but flat, lower yield, some plant contam. • 4-5⭐ Solid stalked trichomes → good resin but not peak purity. • 6⭐ The Kings – Mature capitate-stalked heads (prime 70–120μm, sweet spot 80–110μm). Massive, shiny, bead-like glands packed in a subcuticular “balloon” of oil. Greasy, resin-beaded texture screams full melt. Zero chunky junk or dust. Melts clean into liquid with aggressive bubbling and rich terps. That greasy, flowing texture you see in the video? Fresh resin flooding from fully swollen secretory cells – the biology behind the magic. Bigger heads = more chemical factories = higher potency and flavor. UV-B stress, careful curing, and true landrace lines crank it to another dimension. This is why 6-star solventless is the current demand: purity, transparency, and that full-melt experience everyone’s hunting in 2026. What star rating would YOU give hash like this? Drop your take below 👇 Have you ever pressed or dabbed something this clean? Share your highest melt story or landrace finds – let’s preserve the wisdom together. #6StarHash #FullMelt #Trichomes #Solventless #DrySift #Landrace #HashScience #ResinHeads #CannabisLegacy
0:51

6⭐️ Hash 🍫🔥 Can YOU Visually tell the Trichomes size of true 6-Star hash perfection⁉️ When it’s oily, and has greasy layers, it’s that flawless full-melt bubble. Pure resin gold with zero residue. This is what the 2026 solventless boom is chasing: elite full-melt hash that vaporizes like ancient medicine, not plant junk. But, can you spot the trichome size and quality just by eye that earns those sacred 6 stars? ✨ In our 28-million-year co-evolution with cannabis, the plants taught us this code. Landrace genetics + proper harvest (milky/early amber) + clean processing = swollen resin factories bursting with terps, cannabinoids, and that legendary oily shine. Quick Visual Star Rating Guide (Trichome Science You Can See): • 1-2⭐ Tiny bulbous glands (10–30μm) or dusty debris → powdery, weak, immature. Burns harsh. • 3⭐ Capitate-sessile heads (25–100μm) → decent but flat, lower yield, some plant contam. • 4-5⭐ Solid stalked trichomes → good resin but not peak purity. • 6⭐ The Kings – Mature capitate-stalked heads (prime 70–120μm, sweet spot 80–110μm). Massive, shiny, bead-like glands packed in a subcuticular “balloon” of oil. Greasy, resin-beaded texture screams full melt. Zero chunky junk or dust. Melts clean into liquid with aggressive bubbling and rich terps. That greasy, flowing texture you see in the video? Fresh resin flooding from fully swollen secretory cells – the biology behind the magic. Bigger heads = more chemical factories = higher potency and flavor. UV-B stress, careful curing, and true landrace lines crank it to another dimension. This is why 6-star solventless is the current demand: purity, transparency, and that full-melt experience everyone’s hunting in 2026. What star rating would YOU give hash like this? Drop your take below 👇 Have you ever pressed or dabbed something this clean? Share your highest melt story or landrace finds – let’s preserve the wisdom together. #6StarHash #FullMelt #Trichomes #Solventless #DrySift #Landrace #HashScience #ResinHeads #CannabisLegacy

Łаηdrąćę Вureaմ

241,409 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

$AMD $5 Trillion is Inevitable LT| Agentic AI🧵 Agentic AI is the new $5 Trillion TAM 🚨🚨🚨 This thead will do Comp with $INTC and how to quantify this massive Agentic AI demand spike, and forcing Jensen to rush a CPU design. Global Agentic AI Market size is estimated to be $3-$5Trillion TAM by 2030(McKinsey) Quantifying the demand from agentic AI for AMD involves assessing the broader market growth for agentic systems, their unique computational requirements (particularly for CPUs in orchestration and reasoning tasks), and AMD's positioning very well through products like EPYC processors and partnerships. AMD EPYC Venice is the most superior choice in 2026-2027 for most Agentic AI workloads Agentic AI refers to autonomous AI agents that perform multi-step tasks, involving sequential logic, tool integration, and decision-making workloads that heavily rely on CPUs for handling orchestration, memory management, and context switching, rather than just GPU-parallelized training or batch inference. Agentic AI is often cited as 40-100x more "hungry" than traditional AI due to its continuous, 24/7 operation and complex workflows. This stems from factors like chain-of-thought reasoning (multiple LLM calls per query), API/tool interactions, memory management, and orchestration loops, which can generate 10-100x more tokens and require real-time responsiveness. For example, a single agentic query might trigger 5-20 model inferences, making it 10-20x more compute-intensive than simple chatbots, and the always-on nature compounds this to 40-100x overall. Nvidia's CEO has highlighted this as driving "easily 100x more computation" for inference in agentic/reasoning setups. AMD's EPYC Venice (6th Gen EPYC, codenamed "Venice") and Intel's Xeon 7 Diamond Rapids represent the pinnacle of server CPU technology in 2026, both targeting high-performance data center workloads like AI inference, agentic AI orchestration, cloud computing, and HPC. Venice builds on AMD's Zen 6 architecture, emphasizing core density and efficiency, while Diamond Rapids leverages Intel's Panther Cove P-cores for balanced performance. Both chips adopt similar advancements like 16-channel DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 6, but differ in core counts, process nodes, and overall design philosophy. Intel has faced acute supply constraints across its Xeon lineup, including legacy nodes (Intel 7/3) and the ramping 18A process for next-gen parts. Intel shortage is expected with lead times up to 6 months or longer. 1. AMD EPYC Venice vs Intel Xeon 7 Diamond Rapids Architecture AMD: Zen 6 chiplet design with 8 CCDs and dual IODs Intel: Panther Cove P-cores; multi-die architecture with 4 compute tiles Core/Thread Count AMD: Up to 256 cores / 512 threads (Zen 6c variant) Intel: Up to 192 cores / 192 threads Process Node AMD: TSMC N2 (2nm) Intel: Intel 18A (1.8nm-class); in-house fab Memory Support AMD: 16-channel DDR5; up to 1.6 TB/s bandwidth. Intel: 16-channel DDR5 ; up to 1.6 TB/s bandwidth I/O and Connectivity AMD: PCIe Gen 6 (up to 128 lanes); twice the CPU-to-GPU bandwidth Intel: PCIe Gen 6 (up to 128 lanes); LGA 9324 socket Power (TDP) AMD: Starting 400-500W, potentially lower due to efficiency gains from TSMC 2nm Intel: Starting 400-500W, as it targets competitive efficiency Performance Projections AMD: Up to 70% uplift vs. 5th Gen Turin (1.7x in multi-threaded/AI tasks) Intel: ~40% faster than Granite Rapids (Xeon 6, 128-core). Lags AMD in per-core perf and 40-50% behind Venice core-for-core comp Target Workloads AMD: AI inference/orchestration, HPC, cloud virtualization. Partnerships Intel: Hyperscale AI, general enterprise. Custom silicon Pricing: AMD: estimated $10k-$20k for top SKUs Intel: estimated $8-$18k Availability: AMD: Significant Ramp H2 2026 due to higher allocation from TSMC Intel: H1-H2 2026 delayed, but trying to catch up Overall: ~Venice's 256 cores provide a 33% edge over Diamond Rapids' 192, making it superior for massively parallel tasks like AI training/inference or virtualization ~TSMC's N2 vs. Intel 18A debates rage on which is "better," but AMD's mature chiplet approach yields better density ( 32 cores/CCD vs. Intel's 48/tile). Venice's redesign reduces latency, aiding agentic AI where CPUs handle orchestration ~ Early projections show Venice widening AMD's lead matching or exceeding Diamond Rapids' perf with fewer watts in multi-threaded benchmarks. Intel's no-SMT design (to prioritize AI) handicaps it vs. AMD's 512 threads, though Clearwater Forest (E-core) could compete in density-focused niches. ~Power & Cooling: Both push above 400-500W, demanding liquid cooling. ~AMD been taking market share now above 40%. AMD EPYC Venice emerges as the superior choice in 2026 for most server workloads. Its higher core/thread count (256/512 vs. 192/192), stronger per-core performance, and architecture optimized for AI-driven tasks (agentic orchestration with GPU integration) provide decisive advantages in throughput, scalability, and efficiency. Projections indicate Venice delivering 1.7x the performance of prior gens while widening the gap over Intel ( 40-70% leads in multi-threaded benchmarks). AMD's fabless model with TSMC ensures reliable scaling, and its ecosystem ( open ROCm) appeals to AI adopters. Intel's Diamond Rapids is competitive in single-threaded enterprise apps and custom hyperscale ( NVLink), with potential fab advantages for supply/security. However, without SMT and lower density, it falls short in core-for-core battles—exposing Intel to another generation of AMD dominance unless 18A yields surprise efficiency gains. For data centers prioritizing raw compute ( AI, HPC), Venice wins; for Intel-centric ecosystems or specialized I/O, Diamond Rapids holds ground. Real benchmarks post-launch will confirm, but logic points to AMD pulling ahead. 2. Market size , Potential Revenue and Supply Global Agentic AI market size is projected to be $3-$5 Trillion by 2030 according to McKinsey, where consensus points to 40-50% CAGR driven by small to large enterprise demand. I also wrote a full thread on how and why Agentic AI is so explosive that AMD will blow all anlaysts estimate for subscribers. Link below if you are interested. AMD's data center segment hit a record $5.4B in Q4 2025 (up 39% YoY), with EPYC shipments ramping due to agentic demand. With 2GW of deployment in H2 2026, AMD AI data center revenue has $40-$50B+ at the lowest or most conservative projection; or Total Revenue in the $77-$94B For FY2026. However, Agentic AI massive demand spike could send EPYC revenue 3x to 4x in the next few years, potentially surpassing MI series GPU demand as enterprises prioritize CPU-dense Rack setups. This is pushing $NVDA Jensen to rush a CPU design and acquired Groq, a new CPU player due to this massive TAM. Noted that this is just popping just in weeks, highlighting we are just so early in this AI Supercycle and the pace of adoption is insane, and clearly productivity will skyrocket. Why? Because Agentic AI is 24/7 Smart AI agent working for you or your businesses is a mad compelling, and it is estimated to be 40-100x more Inference Hugnry! Many experts already said it is impossible to project this kind of Inference Demand. AI CapEx is expected to ramp up even more in 2027-2028-2029 and 2030 as Global Agentic AI is going to scale to $3-$5 Trillion TAM by 2030. The nature of Agentic is driving higher CPU/GPU ratio, with CPUs handling 50-90% of Agentic workflows. For example, The current Helios Rack: 18 compute trays per rack with 72 GPUs + 18 CPUs. The beauty of this $META and $AMD long term partnership is, that it is absolutely flexible to adjust racks to higher CPU rato or equal to service different needs. Helios rack can be easily swap to 2 GPUs 2CPUs or even CPUs only trays for dedicated orchestration/head nodes. You see, the beauty of this open rack-scale is flexibility and evolvability. If Agentic AI demand pushes much higher, AMD should be able to adjust variant trays without abandoning Heilos Rack. We can't talk just about massive Agentic AI demand without talking about the Supply side or TSMC. TSMC, AMD's primary foundry for advanced nodes ( Zen 6/Venice on N2/2nm), is addressing AI-driven shortages through massive expansions. TSMC accelerates fab construction with up to 10 facilities targeted for 2026. TSMC is accelerating its domestic manufacturing expansion, with industry sources indicating that as many as ten fabs could be under construction or preparing to begin operations across Taiwan’s major science parks. TSMC Capex: $52-56B in 2026 (up 37% YoY), with $45B already approved for new/upgraded capacities. 70-80% for advanced processes (2nm/A16), 10-20% for packaging (CoWoS quadrupling to 120-140K wafers/month by late 2026). In addition, Taiwanese companies (led by TSMC) commit to at least $250B in direct investments in US-based advanced semiconductor, AI, and energy production/innovation capacity.Taiwan provides $250B in government credit guarantees to facilitate additional investments and build a full US semiconductor ecosystem (including industrial parks). TSMC completed a second land purchase in Arizona (January 2026) for gigafab scaling, with an additional $100B+ (potentially four more modules) to further expand and qualify for tariff exemptions. AMD with secured 12GW from OpenAI and $META and massive Agentic AI will mean higher priority acess to 20-30% more wafers on TSMC advanced nodes, as TSMC has multi-year agreements with AMD for AI chips. Dr. C. C. Wei, CEO of TSMC quote: "I spend a lot of time in the last three or four months talking to my customer and then customers. Customer. I want to make sure that my customers demand are real. I talk to those cloud service providers, all of them. Their answer is. I'm quite satisfied with their answer. Actually they show me the evidence that the AI really help their business. So they grow their business successfully and he or she in their financial return. So I also double check their financial status. They are very rich." Amid shortages, the US buildout ensures AMD can ramp production of Instinct GPUs and EPYC CPUs without the constraints hitting competitors like Intel. By diversifying away from Taiwan (85% of advanced nodes today), the agreement mitigates supply disruptions, ensuring stable flows for AMD's chips. Scaling production and securing supply will matter for AMD the most in the next 5-10 years growth. The growth could be 80-100% YoY or higher; or it could be in the 60%. The aggressive TSMC supply ramp is reassuring the higher growth point. Conclusion: AMD stands at a pivotal inflection point in 2026, where the explosive rise of agentic AI demanding 40-100x more inference compute through its 24/7, multi-step orchestration positions the company to potentially triple its EPYC CPU revenue to $45-60B+ by 2028 while scaling Instinct GPUs to tens of billions annually by 2027. Agentic AI demand could push AI CapEx closer to $1 Trillion in 2027, far higher than most estimates. Dr. Lisa Su, AMD's visionary CEO, is masterfully securing supply to harness this massive demand by prioritizing operational execution and deep TSMC collaboration, ensuring readiness for the second-half 2026 AI ramp. Dr. Su has explicitly called out surging EPYC demand for agentic tasks where CPUs power head nodes and traditional workloads alongside GPUs while guiding for data center dominance through proactive capacity planning and partnerships like Nutanix ($150M investment for open agentic platforms) or providing tens of millions CPUs for OpenAI, $META, $ORCL, $AMZN, $MSFT, $GOOGL and others. Her strategy includes multi-year TSMC agreements for advanced nodes (N2 for Venice CPUs and future Instincts), diversifying beyond Taiwan to mitigate risks, and unveiling innovations like the MI455X GPU at CES 2026, which she touted as enabling "the next trillion-dollar market opportunity" in physical AI. Dr. Su's forward-looking vision predicting AI reaching 5 billion users emphasizes "AI everywhere," backed by hardware like Ryzen AI chips, all while declaring demand "going through the roof" and committing to scale without bottlenecks. TSMC's aggressive ramp-up, fueled by $52-56B in 2026 capex (up 37% YoY) and 10+ new fabs across Taiwan, the US (Arizona cluster expanding to 6+ modules with $165B+ investment), Japan, and Europe, provides profound reassurance for AMD's supply stability. The January 2026 US-Taiwan agreement committing $250B in investments and credit guarantees for US reshoring accelerates this, granting tariff relief (15% rates with 1.5-2.5x exemptions) tied to capacity buildouts, enabling TSMC to potentially double output over the decade to meet AI wafer hunger. This translates to 20-30% higher wafer allocations on key nodes, sidestepping Intel-like shortages and empowering Dr. Su's team to deliver on hyperscaler demands without disruption. Ultimately, this synergy cements AMD's leadership in the agentic era, promising sustained growth, $5T+ valuations at scale, and a resilient path forward as AI reshapes the world. This is NOT Financial Advice! Video source: AMD CES 2026
2:49

$AMD $5 Trillion is Inevitable LT| Agentic AI🧵 Agentic AI is the new $5 Trillion TAM 🚨🚨🚨 This thead will do Comp with $INTC and how to quantify this massive Agentic AI demand spike, and forcing Jensen to rush a CPU design. Global Agentic AI Market size is estimated to be $3-$5Trillion TAM by 2030(McKinsey) Quantifying the demand from agentic AI for AMD involves assessing the broader market growth for agentic systems, their unique computational requirements (particularly for CPUs in orchestration and reasoning tasks), and AMD's positioning very well through products like EPYC processors and partnerships. AMD EPYC Venice is the most superior choice in 2026-2027 for most Agentic AI workloads Agentic AI refers to autonomous AI agents that perform multi-step tasks, involving sequential logic, tool integration, and decision-making workloads that heavily rely on CPUs for handling orchestration, memory management, and context switching, rather than just GPU-parallelized training or batch inference. Agentic AI is often cited as 40-100x more "hungry" than traditional AI due to its continuous, 24/7 operation and complex workflows. This stems from factors like chain-of-thought reasoning (multiple LLM calls per query), API/tool interactions, memory management, and orchestration loops, which can generate 10-100x more tokens and require real-time responsiveness. For example, a single agentic query might trigger 5-20 model inferences, making it 10-20x more compute-intensive than simple chatbots, and the always-on nature compounds this to 40-100x overall. Nvidia's CEO has highlighted this as driving "easily 100x more computation" for inference in agentic/reasoning setups. AMD's EPYC Venice (6th Gen EPYC, codenamed "Venice") and Intel's Xeon 7 Diamond Rapids represent the pinnacle of server CPU technology in 2026, both targeting high-performance data center workloads like AI inference, agentic AI orchestration, cloud computing, and HPC. Venice builds on AMD's Zen 6 architecture, emphasizing core density and efficiency, while Diamond Rapids leverages Intel's Panther Cove P-cores for balanced performance. Both chips adopt similar advancements like 16-channel DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 6, but differ in core counts, process nodes, and overall design philosophy. Intel has faced acute supply constraints across its Xeon lineup, including legacy nodes (Intel 7/3) and the ramping 18A process for next-gen parts. Intel shortage is expected with lead times up to 6 months or longer. 1. AMD EPYC Venice vs Intel Xeon 7 Diamond Rapids Architecture AMD: Zen 6 chiplet design with 8 CCDs and dual IODs Intel: Panther Cove P-cores; multi-die architecture with 4 compute tiles Core/Thread Count AMD: Up to 256 cores / 512 threads (Zen 6c variant) Intel: Up to 192 cores / 192 threads Process Node AMD: TSMC N2 (2nm) Intel: Intel 18A (1.8nm-class); in-house fab Memory Support AMD: 16-channel DDR5; up to 1.6 TB/s bandwidth. Intel: 16-channel DDR5 ; up to 1.6 TB/s bandwidth I/O and Connectivity AMD: PCIe Gen 6 (up to 128 lanes); twice the CPU-to-GPU bandwidth Intel: PCIe Gen 6 (up to 128 lanes); LGA 9324 socket Power (TDP) AMD: Starting 400-500W, potentially lower due to efficiency gains from TSMC 2nm Intel: Starting 400-500W, as it targets competitive efficiency Performance Projections AMD: Up to 70% uplift vs. 5th Gen Turin (1.7x in multi-threaded/AI tasks) Intel: ~40% faster than Granite Rapids (Xeon 6, 128-core). Lags AMD in per-core perf and 40-50% behind Venice core-for-core comp Target Workloads AMD: AI inference/orchestration, HPC, cloud virtualization. Partnerships Intel: Hyperscale AI, general enterprise. Custom silicon Pricing: AMD: estimated $10k-$20k for top SKUs Intel: estimated $8-$18k Availability: AMD: Significant Ramp H2 2026 due to higher allocation from TSMC Intel: H1-H2 2026 delayed, but trying to catch up Overall: ~Venice's 256 cores provide a 33% edge over Diamond Rapids' 192, making it superior for massively parallel tasks like AI training/inference or virtualization ~TSMC's N2 vs. Intel 18A debates rage on which is "better," but AMD's mature chiplet approach yields better density ( 32 cores/CCD vs. Intel's 48/tile). Venice's redesign reduces latency, aiding agentic AI where CPUs handle orchestration ~ Early projections show Venice widening AMD's lead matching or exceeding Diamond Rapids' perf with fewer watts in multi-threaded benchmarks. Intel's no-SMT design (to prioritize AI) handicaps it vs. AMD's 512 threads, though Clearwater Forest (E-core) could compete in density-focused niches. ~Power & Cooling: Both push above 400-500W, demanding liquid cooling. ~AMD been taking market share now above 40%. AMD EPYC Venice emerges as the superior choice in 2026 for most server workloads. Its higher core/thread count (256/512 vs. 192/192), stronger per-core performance, and architecture optimized for AI-driven tasks (agentic orchestration with GPU integration) provide decisive advantages in throughput, scalability, and efficiency. Projections indicate Venice delivering 1.7x the performance of prior gens while widening the gap over Intel ( 40-70% leads in multi-threaded benchmarks). AMD's fabless model with TSMC ensures reliable scaling, and its ecosystem ( open ROCm) appeals to AI adopters. Intel's Diamond Rapids is competitive in single-threaded enterprise apps and custom hyperscale ( NVLink), with potential fab advantages for supply/security. However, without SMT and lower density, it falls short in core-for-core battles—exposing Intel to another generation of AMD dominance unless 18A yields surprise efficiency gains. For data centers prioritizing raw compute ( AI, HPC), Venice wins; for Intel-centric ecosystems or specialized I/O, Diamond Rapids holds ground. Real benchmarks post-launch will confirm, but logic points to AMD pulling ahead. 2. Market size , Potential Revenue and Supply Global Agentic AI market size is projected to be $3-$5 Trillion by 2030 according to McKinsey, where consensus points to 40-50% CAGR driven by small to large enterprise demand. I also wrote a full thread on how and why Agentic AI is so explosive that AMD will blow all anlaysts estimate for subscribers. Link below if you are interested. AMD's data center segment hit a record $5.4B in Q4 2025 (up 39% YoY), with EPYC shipments ramping due to agentic demand. With 2GW of deployment in H2 2026, AMD AI data center revenue has $40-$50B+ at the lowest or most conservative projection; or Total Revenue in the $77-$94B For FY2026. However, Agentic AI massive demand spike could send EPYC revenue 3x to 4x in the next few years, potentially surpassing MI series GPU demand as enterprises prioritize CPU-dense Rack setups. This is pushing $NVDA Jensen to rush a CPU design and acquired Groq, a new CPU player due to this massive TAM. Noted that this is just popping just in weeks, highlighting we are just so early in this AI Supercycle and the pace of adoption is insane, and clearly productivity will skyrocket. Why? Because Agentic AI is 24/7 Smart AI agent working for you or your businesses is a mad compelling, and it is estimated to be 40-100x more Inference Hugnry! Many experts already said it is impossible to project this kind of Inference Demand. AI CapEx is expected to ramp up even more in 2027-2028-2029 and 2030 as Global Agentic AI is going to scale to $3-$5 Trillion TAM by 2030. The nature of Agentic is driving higher CPU/GPU ratio, with CPUs handling 50-90% of Agentic workflows. For example, The current Helios Rack: 18 compute trays per rack with 72 GPUs + 18 CPUs. The beauty of this $META and $AMD long term partnership is, that it is absolutely flexible to adjust racks to higher CPU rato or equal to service different needs. Helios rack can be easily swap to 2 GPUs 2CPUs or even CPUs only trays for dedicated orchestration/head nodes. You see, the beauty of this open rack-scale is flexibility and evolvability. If Agentic AI demand pushes much higher, AMD should be able to adjust variant trays without abandoning Heilos Rack. We can't talk just about massive Agentic AI demand without talking about the Supply side or TSMC. TSMC, AMD's primary foundry for advanced nodes ( Zen 6/Venice on N2/2nm), is addressing AI-driven shortages through massive expansions. TSMC accelerates fab construction with up to 10 facilities targeted for 2026. TSMC is accelerating its domestic manufacturing expansion, with industry sources indicating that as many as ten fabs could be under construction or preparing to begin operations across Taiwan’s major science parks. TSMC Capex: $52-56B in 2026 (up 37% YoY), with $45B already approved for new/upgraded capacities. 70-80% for advanced processes (2nm/A16), 10-20% for packaging (CoWoS quadrupling to 120-140K wafers/month by late 2026). In addition, Taiwanese companies (led by TSMC) commit to at least $250B in direct investments in US-based advanced semiconductor, AI, and energy production/innovation capacity.Taiwan provides $250B in government credit guarantees to facilitate additional investments and build a full US semiconductor ecosystem (including industrial parks). TSMC completed a second land purchase in Arizona (January 2026) for gigafab scaling, with an additional $100B+ (potentially four more modules) to further expand and qualify for tariff exemptions. AMD with secured 12GW from OpenAI and $META and massive Agentic AI will mean higher priority acess to 20-30% more wafers on TSMC advanced nodes, as TSMC has multi-year agreements with AMD for AI chips. Dr. C. C. Wei, CEO of TSMC quote: "I spend a lot of time in the last three or four months talking to my customer and then customers. Customer. I want to make sure that my customers demand are real. I talk to those cloud service providers, all of them. Their answer is. I'm quite satisfied with their answer. Actually they show me the evidence that the AI really help their business. So they grow their business successfully and he or she in their financial return. So I also double check their financial status. They are very rich." Amid shortages, the US buildout ensures AMD can ramp production of Instinct GPUs and EPYC CPUs without the constraints hitting competitors like Intel. By diversifying away from Taiwan (85% of advanced nodes today), the agreement mitigates supply disruptions, ensuring stable flows for AMD's chips. Scaling production and securing supply will matter for AMD the most in the next 5-10 years growth. The growth could be 80-100% YoY or higher; or it could be in the 60%. The aggressive TSMC supply ramp is reassuring the higher growth point. Conclusion: AMD stands at a pivotal inflection point in 2026, where the explosive rise of agentic AI demanding 40-100x more inference compute through its 24/7, multi-step orchestration positions the company to potentially triple its EPYC CPU revenue to $45-60B+ by 2028 while scaling Instinct GPUs to tens of billions annually by 2027. Agentic AI demand could push AI CapEx closer to $1 Trillion in 2027, far higher than most estimates. Dr. Lisa Su, AMD's visionary CEO, is masterfully securing supply to harness this massive demand by prioritizing operational execution and deep TSMC collaboration, ensuring readiness for the second-half 2026 AI ramp. Dr. Su has explicitly called out surging EPYC demand for agentic tasks where CPUs power head nodes and traditional workloads alongside GPUs while guiding for data center dominance through proactive capacity planning and partnerships like Nutanix ($150M investment for open agentic platforms) or providing tens of millions CPUs for OpenAI, $META, $ORCL, $AMZN, $MSFT, $GOOGL and others. Her strategy includes multi-year TSMC agreements for advanced nodes (N2 for Venice CPUs and future Instincts), diversifying beyond Taiwan to mitigate risks, and unveiling innovations like the MI455X GPU at CES 2026, which she touted as enabling "the next trillion-dollar market opportunity" in physical AI. Dr. Su's forward-looking vision predicting AI reaching 5 billion users emphasizes "AI everywhere," backed by hardware like Ryzen AI chips, all while declaring demand "going through the roof" and committing to scale without bottlenecks. TSMC's aggressive ramp-up, fueled by $52-56B in 2026 capex (up 37% YoY) and 10+ new fabs across Taiwan, the US (Arizona cluster expanding to 6+ modules with $165B+ investment), Japan, and Europe, provides profound reassurance for AMD's supply stability. The January 2026 US-Taiwan agreement committing $250B in investments and credit guarantees for US reshoring accelerates this, granting tariff relief (15% rates with 1.5-2.5x exemptions) tied to capacity buildouts, enabling TSMC to potentially double output over the decade to meet AI wafer hunger. This translates to 20-30% higher wafer allocations on key nodes, sidestepping Intel-like shortages and empowering Dr. Su's team to deliver on hyperscaler demands without disruption. Ultimately, this synergy cements AMD's leadership in the agentic era, promising sustained growth, $5T+ valuations at scale, and a resilient path forward as AI reshapes the world. This is NOT Financial Advice! Video source: AMD CES 2026

Mike

44,460 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Thread: BJP's Bold Surge in Kerala's 2025 Local Body Elections – A Game-Changer on the Horizon 1/10: Kerala's local body polls on Dec 9 and 11 have wrapped up, with results dropping today (December 13). Amid high 73%+ turnout, the BJP-led NDA is making waves by fielding a record 21,065 candidates – up massively from past cycles. That's 19,871 pure Lotus warriors! From scraping benches for nominees to dominating the fray – this is the BJP's biggest splash yet in God's Own Country. 2/10: What's fueling this? Strategic inclusivity. BJP has allocated over 40% seats to women – aligning with Kerala's record 52% female candidates overall (39,609 women in the mix). Empowering voices like these isn't just numbers; it's building a diverse, dynamic base. Youth power too: Hundreds of under-25s, including BJYM leaders, are contesting. Fresh faces for fresh ideas. 3/10: Hindu youth are rallying big-time. Tired of the LDF's "welfare fatigue" and the UDF's "old guard," they're drawn to the BJP's development pitch – think QR-coded voter slips, AI governance promises and complete transformation of Kerala towns to First World status. Amit Shah nailed it: Youth across communities want "performance over propaganda." Early trends show NDA eyeing 25% vote share. 4/10: This youth wave signals trouble for the communists led by the CPIM. Anti-incumbency bites hard after 10 years – gold smuggling scandals, pension delays and Vizhinjam port woes have eroded trust. The LDF's 2024 Lok Sabha flop (just 1 seat) and internal rifts (like CPIM-Jamaat friction) point to decline. The BJP's rise could flip urban bastions like Trivandrum Corporation – a semi-final before the 2026 Assembly polls. 5/10: Kerala Christians are the UDF's lifeline. With Christian backing the Congress is holding on to Kerala by its fingernails. But the BJP's outreach (Suresh Gopi's Lok Sabha victory and anti-love jehad narratives) is pulling Christians away from the Congress. And here's the kicker: Christian population dipped to below 18% (from higher shares), hit by low births and migration. UDF's vote bank is shrinking fast. 6/10: With Hindus (55% population) consolidating behind BJP – no more "soft Left" drift to SNDP/NSS – the math tilts in favour of Saffron. Add even 10-15% Christian swing (seen in Thrissur Lok Sabha), and NDA could coalition-crush in key districts. LDF's urban slump (Thrissur Corp turnout crashed to 62%) screams shift. The Kerala duopoly is cracking. 7/10: Ground buzz: BJP's door-to-door "Mission 2025" hit 50 lakh homes, countering "poisoned narratives." Muslim candidates like Mumtaz in Hindu wards signal bold inclusivity. Even wall graffiti is saffron-fied. NDA's mantra: Politics of Performance vs Corruption. Voters feel change is coming. 8/10: Verdict today could preview 2026 Assembly election: BJP as kingmaker or bigger. From 1% in past to 20%+ barrier-breaker – Kerala is awakening. LDF down, UDF wobbly, NDA up. Perhaps the people of Kerala are finally realising that Development is preferable to Division. 9/10: Quick stats recap: 75K+ candidates, 2.8 crore voters, 1,199 local bodies at stake. BJP's jump: From marginal to major player. Women and youth quotas = smart politics. Hindu youth = the engine. CPIM fall = Inevitable. Congress cling = temporary. Eyes on counts. 10/10: Kerala deserves Vikas, not Vikalp-less drama. Whatever the voters have decided will be evident in a few short hours, but one thing is abundantly clear - from here on, the BJP is a significant player in Kerala politics. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
1:00

Thread: BJP's Bold Surge in Kerala's 2025 Local Body Elections – A Game-Changer on the Horizon 1/10: Kerala's local body polls on Dec 9 and 11 have wrapped up, with results dropping today (December 13). Amid high 73%+ turnout, the BJP-led NDA is making waves by fielding a record 21,065 candidates – up massively from past cycles. That's 19,871 pure Lotus warriors! From scraping benches for nominees to dominating the fray – this is the BJP's biggest splash yet in God's Own Country. 2/10: What's fueling this? Strategic inclusivity. BJP has allocated over 40% seats to women – aligning with Kerala's record 52% female candidates overall (39,609 women in the mix). Empowering voices like these isn't just numbers; it's building a diverse, dynamic base. Youth power too: Hundreds of under-25s, including BJYM leaders, are contesting. Fresh faces for fresh ideas. 3/10: Hindu youth are rallying big-time. Tired of the LDF's "welfare fatigue" and the UDF's "old guard," they're drawn to the BJP's development pitch – think QR-coded voter slips, AI governance promises and complete transformation of Kerala towns to First World status. Amit Shah nailed it: Youth across communities want "performance over propaganda." Early trends show NDA eyeing 25% vote share. 4/10: This youth wave signals trouble for the communists led by the CPIM. Anti-incumbency bites hard after 10 years – gold smuggling scandals, pension delays and Vizhinjam port woes have eroded trust. The LDF's 2024 Lok Sabha flop (just 1 seat) and internal rifts (like CPIM-Jamaat friction) point to decline. The BJP's rise could flip urban bastions like Trivandrum Corporation – a semi-final before the 2026 Assembly polls. 5/10: Kerala Christians are the UDF's lifeline. With Christian backing the Congress is holding on to Kerala by its fingernails. But the BJP's outreach (Suresh Gopi's Lok Sabha victory and anti-love jehad narratives) is pulling Christians away from the Congress. And here's the kicker: Christian population dipped to below 18% (from higher shares), hit by low births and migration. UDF's vote bank is shrinking fast. 6/10: With Hindus (55% population) consolidating behind BJP – no more "soft Left" drift to SNDP/NSS – the math tilts in favour of Saffron. Add even 10-15% Christian swing (seen in Thrissur Lok Sabha), and NDA could coalition-crush in key districts. LDF's urban slump (Thrissur Corp turnout crashed to 62%) screams shift. The Kerala duopoly is cracking. 7/10: Ground buzz: BJP's door-to-door "Mission 2025" hit 50 lakh homes, countering "poisoned narratives." Muslim candidates like Mumtaz in Hindu wards signal bold inclusivity. Even wall graffiti is saffron-fied. NDA's mantra: Politics of Performance vs Corruption. Voters feel change is coming. 8/10: Verdict today could preview 2026 Assembly election: BJP as kingmaker or bigger. From 1% in past to 20%+ barrier-breaker – Kerala is awakening. LDF down, UDF wobbly, NDA up. Perhaps the people of Kerala are finally realising that Development is preferable to Division. 9/10: Quick stats recap: 75K+ candidates, 2.8 crore voters, 1,199 local bodies at stake. BJP's jump: From marginal to major player. Women and youth quotas = smart politics. Hindu youth = the engine. CPIM fall = Inevitable. Congress cling = temporary. Eyes on counts. 10/10: Kerala deserves Vikas, not Vikalp-less drama. Whatever the voters have decided will be evident in a few short hours, but one thing is abundantly clear - from here on, the BJP is a significant player in Kerala politics. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳

Rakesh Krishnan Simha

24,901 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson promoted a "Jews control the U.S." conspiracy theory the DAY AFTER it was widely debunked. Worse, Tucker used the trope to malign the Detroit-area Sheriff who was the public face of the terrorist attack against a Jewish preschool last month. On March 23, Shadow of Ezra — which peddles dark (and typically false) tales about Jews & Israel — first floated the bogus theory, alongside a clip from a press conference three days prior by Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard. The post took something true — that someone had posted an anti-Semitic meme featuring Sheriff Bouchard — and wrapped it inside a lie: claiming that the sheriff had ordered the meme's author arrested "to teach the public a lesson." During the press conference, Sheriff Bouchard noted that the meme's author had been arrested in Wisconsin, but without any suggestion that it was related to the meme. Less than 24 hours after the Shadow of Ezra post, early morning on March 24, Oakland County Sheriff’s Office issued a statement in its own viral post confirming that the meme's author was arrested for an unrelated, outstanding felony warrant. Various major news outlets picked up the story. By that evening, it would have taken less than 30 seconds on Google to see that the conspiracy theory had been debunked. Enter Tucker Carlson. Long after the truth was clear, on the evening of March 25, Tucker spent several minutes of his monologue ranting as if the debunked trope were actually real. Tucker bellowed, "Sheriff Bouchard from Michigan has decided that he’s going to arrest and imprison people who make memes mocking him." He then got firmly on his high horse, declaring that Bouchard "should be the subject of a federal investigation, like in about one minute after that hits the Internet." But Tucker didn't just want the full weight of the FBI on Bouchard; he wanted riots. "How is this not leading to mass protests? Why did they not shut your sheriff’s department down," he asked incredulously. Of course, the reason is that the entire premise for his performative outrage was a loopy conspiracy theory that could have been easily debunked in 30 seconds or less. Just in case someone might want to give Tucker the benefit of the doubt, he doubled down on the flimsy falsehood two days later, reposting specifically this segment in a standalone video on March 27 — three days after it had been widely reported as bogus. But this is par for Tucker's course these days. As long as a supposed "fact" makes Israel or Jews look deceitful, sinister or secretly pulling the strings to screw over "ordinary" Americans, Tucker will enthusiastically run with it — no matter how outlandish or how easily the "fact" can be debunked. And this example gives lie to the myth — peddled most often by Megyn Kelly — that Tucker is merely criticizing "Israel." There was not even a possible tangential connection between the Sheriff Bouchard conspiracy and Israel. It was done strictly to spread the poisonous narrative that Jews are secretly controlling America and desescrating key pillars of our society, including the Constitution. For Tucker, that was all he needed to gleefully push the falsehood like the carnival barker he has become.
3:56

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson promoted a "Jews control the U.S." conspiracy theory the DAY AFTER it was widely debunked. Worse, Tucker used the trope to malign the Detroit-area Sheriff who was the public face of the terrorist attack against a Jewish preschool last month. On March 23, Shadow of Ezra — which peddles dark (and typically false) tales about Jews & Israel — first floated the bogus theory, alongside a clip from a press conference three days prior by Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard. The post took something true — that someone had posted an anti-Semitic meme featuring Sheriff Bouchard — and wrapped it inside a lie: claiming that the sheriff had ordered the meme's author arrested "to teach the public a lesson." During the press conference, Sheriff Bouchard noted that the meme's author had been arrested in Wisconsin, but without any suggestion that it was related to the meme. Less than 24 hours after the Shadow of Ezra post, early morning on March 24, Oakland County Sheriff’s Office issued a statement in its own viral post confirming that the meme's author was arrested for an unrelated, outstanding felony warrant. Various major news outlets picked up the story. By that evening, it would have taken less than 30 seconds on Google to see that the conspiracy theory had been debunked. Enter Tucker Carlson. Long after the truth was clear, on the evening of March 25, Tucker spent several minutes of his monologue ranting as if the debunked trope were actually real. Tucker bellowed, "Sheriff Bouchard from Michigan has decided that he’s going to arrest and imprison people who make memes mocking him." He then got firmly on his high horse, declaring that Bouchard "should be the subject of a federal investigation, like in about one minute after that hits the Internet." But Tucker didn't just want the full weight of the FBI on Bouchard; he wanted riots. "How is this not leading to mass protests? Why did they not shut your sheriff’s department down," he asked incredulously. Of course, the reason is that the entire premise for his performative outrage was a loopy conspiracy theory that could have been easily debunked in 30 seconds or less. Just in case someone might want to give Tucker the benefit of the doubt, he doubled down on the flimsy falsehood two days later, reposting specifically this segment in a standalone video on March 27 — three days after it had been widely reported as bogus. But this is par for Tucker's course these days. As long as a supposed "fact" makes Israel or Jews look deceitful, sinister or secretly pulling the strings to screw over "ordinary" Americans, Tucker will enthusiastically run with it — no matter how outlandish or how easily the "fact" can be debunked. And this example gives lie to the myth — peddled most often by Megyn Kelly — that Tucker is merely criticizing "Israel." There was not even a possible tangential connection between the Sheriff Bouchard conspiracy and Israel. It was done strictly to spread the poisonous narrative that Jews are secretly controlling America and desescrating key pillars of our society, including the Constitution. For Tucker, that was all he needed to gleefully push the falsehood like the carnival barker he has become.

Joel Mowbray

51,268 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Why Opus 4.6 Is The Final Boss Of Algorithmic Trading (Full Bot Build) the day of the human trader is officially over and most people are still staring at charts like it is 1995. wall street is terrified because the barrier to entry just got deleted by a piece of software that can outthink a stanford graduate in seconds. they want you to believe that you need a multi million dollar education to compete with the big banks. they want you to stay stuck in the cycle of emotional trading and leverage because that is how they pay for their hamptons houses. but there is a specific reason why every retail trader is about to become obsolete unless they pivot right now. i am going to show you exactly why your current strategy is a mathematical death trap and how a single jump in technology just changed the game forever every time you sit down at your computer to draw lines on a chart you are entering a gunfight with a toothpick. the institutions have been using high frequency algorithms for decades while you are trying to guess which way the candle is going to move based on a feeling in your gut. it is not a fair fight and it was never intended to be. last year we were looking at models that could barely handle basic logic but now the intelligence has scaled to a point where the machines are finding edges we did not even know existed. there is a ghost in the machine that is pulling out strategies with sharp ratios so high they look like typos. if you do not understand how to harness this power you are essentially donating your capital to the people who already have too much of it i spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on developers because i was too scared to learn how to code myself. i thought that being the idea guy was enough and that i could just hire people from upwork to build my dreams. i got rinsed for years paying for apps and bots that did not work because i did not have my hands on the wheel. it took losing a massive amount of money through liquidations and over trading to realize that nobody was coming to save me. i had to become the person who could build the systems or i was going to be another statistic in the graveyard of traders who thought they were smarter than the math. once i finally sat down and forced myself to understand the syntax everything shifted and the world became a giant playground of data the truth is that code is the great equalizer because it does not care where you came from or what school you went to. i got held back in seventh grade and my teacher told me i would not make it around here. that kind of talk is meant to keep you in your place but the computer does not have a bias. if you can write the logic the system will execute it exactly as told regardless of your background. we are living in a time where a kid in a basement can build a system that rivals a hedge fund because the big tech companies are subsidizing our intelligence. they are spending hundreds of billions of dollars on infrastructure and we are the ones who get to reap the rewards of their competition most people fail in this game because they fall in love with a single idea and refuse to let it go even when it is burning their account to the ground. they spend months or years trying to make one indicator work when the data clearly shows it is trash. you have to drop the ego and realize that your intuition is probably your biggest liability. the secret to winning is iterating to success by testing a hundred ideas until you find the one that actually sticks. i call it the rbi system which stands for research backtest and implement. if you skip any of these steps you are just gambling with extra steps and the house always wins in the end research is where most traders get lazy because they just want a magic bot that prints money while they sleep. they go to youtube and find some guy promising a ninety percent win rate with a rsi crossover. that is not research that is falling for marketing fluff designed to sell you a dream. real research happens when you dive into white papers and study what the quants are actually doing on wall street. you look for market inefficiencies like liquidation clusters and cross exchange discrepancies that are hidden in plain sight. by the time you finish this process you should have a list of ideas that are grounded in reality instead of wishful thinking backtesting is the filter that saves you from losing your life savings on a bad hunch. most people use tools that repaint or give them false confidence because the data is not being handled correctly. if you are using a basic charting platform to see if your strategy works you are likely seeing a version of history that does not exist. you need to use raw python libraries like backtesting py to see the cold hard truth of how your logic would have performed. when you see a drawdown of thirty percent on paper you realize that using ten times leverage would have deleted your account five times over. the math does not lie and it is the only thing that can protect you from your own greed the most dangerous drug in the world is leverage because it makes you feel like a genius right before it makes you a pauper. i have watched two billion dollars get liquidated in a single day because people thought they could predict the bottom with fifty times leverage. the exchanges can see exactly where your liquidation price is and they have every incentive to push the price there to hunt your liquidity. you are playing in a casino where the house can see your cards and they are actively trying to take them from you. the only way to win is to stop playing their game and start using limit orders to save on the fees that are slowly bleeding you dry it is funny how much money people will spend on food and entertainment but they will hesitate to invest in their own education. they will spend a thousand dollars on a weekend out but will not put that same money into learning a skill that could provide for them for the rest of their lives. money is just a tool of exchange and it always replenishes if you are providing value to the world. if you spend your capital on knowledge you are buying back your time and your freedom. i decided to live my life on youtube and build in public because i wanted to show people that a regular guy could do this. now i have fully automated systems trading for me while i sleep and i never have to worry about getting licked by a sudden market move again chasing the greats like jim simons is not about the money it is about the mastery of the system. he ran up a net worth of over thirty billion dollars by doing exactly what we are talking about here. he did not stare at charts all day and hope for the best he built models that exploited the mathematical laws of the market. he was a scientist first and a trader second and that is the mindset you need to adopt. if you are not approaching this quantitatively you are just a gambler who happens to be sitting at a computer. the goal is to become a quant researcher who happens to have robots executing their findings the transition from hand trader to automated builder is the most liberating thing you can do for your mental health. you go from waking up in a cold sweat checking your phone to waking up and checking your logs to see how the system performed. even if the day was red you have data that tells you why and you can use that to make the system better tomorrow. it is a process of constant improvement and refinement that never really ends. you are building a legacy of code that will continue to work for you as long as the electricity is running. i am not afraid to die on a treadmill because i know that i will outwork anyone who is just looking for a shortcut if you are still on the fence about whether or not you can do this just remember that i was exactly where you are. i was losing money and feeling like the market was rigged against me because it actually was. i had to decide that i was going to change my environment and take control of my own destiny. you have the same opportunity right now to pivot and start building your own automated future. the models are getting better every single day and the barrier to entry is lower than it has ever been in human history. you just have to decide to lock in and do the work for a thousand days until you become undeniable there is no better feeling than finding a strategy that has a sharp ratio over ten and knowing that you built it with your own two hands. it is a moment of pure clarity where you realize that you are no longer a victim of the market. you are the architect of your own financial reality and the possibilities are literally endless. i am going to keep sharing everything i find because i believe that we can take on wall street together. as long as i am breathing i will be stepping on the gas and pushing the boundaries of what is possible with code. welcome to the family and let's get after it because the machines are already running and they are not waiting for anyone
2:49:30

Why Opus 4.6 Is The Final Boss Of Algorithmic Trading (Full Bot Build) the day of the human trader is officially over and most people are still staring at charts like it is 1995. wall street is terrified because the barrier to entry just got deleted by a piece of software that can outthink a stanford graduate in seconds. they want you to believe that you need a multi million dollar education to compete with the big banks. they want you to stay stuck in the cycle of emotional trading and leverage because that is how they pay for their hamptons houses. but there is a specific reason why every retail trader is about to become obsolete unless they pivot right now. i am going to show you exactly why your current strategy is a mathematical death trap and how a single jump in technology just changed the game forever every time you sit down at your computer to draw lines on a chart you are entering a gunfight with a toothpick. the institutions have been using high frequency algorithms for decades while you are trying to guess which way the candle is going to move based on a feeling in your gut. it is not a fair fight and it was never intended to be. last year we were looking at models that could barely handle basic logic but now the intelligence has scaled to a point where the machines are finding edges we did not even know existed. there is a ghost in the machine that is pulling out strategies with sharp ratios so high they look like typos. if you do not understand how to harness this power you are essentially donating your capital to the people who already have too much of it i spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on developers because i was too scared to learn how to code myself. i thought that being the idea guy was enough and that i could just hire people from upwork to build my dreams. i got rinsed for years paying for apps and bots that did not work because i did not have my hands on the wheel. it took losing a massive amount of money through liquidations and over trading to realize that nobody was coming to save me. i had to become the person who could build the systems or i was going to be another statistic in the graveyard of traders who thought they were smarter than the math. once i finally sat down and forced myself to understand the syntax everything shifted and the world became a giant playground of data the truth is that code is the great equalizer because it does not care where you came from or what school you went to. i got held back in seventh grade and my teacher told me i would not make it around here. that kind of talk is meant to keep you in your place but the computer does not have a bias. if you can write the logic the system will execute it exactly as told regardless of your background. we are living in a time where a kid in a basement can build a system that rivals a hedge fund because the big tech companies are subsidizing our intelligence. they are spending hundreds of billions of dollars on infrastructure and we are the ones who get to reap the rewards of their competition most people fail in this game because they fall in love with a single idea and refuse to let it go even when it is burning their account to the ground. they spend months or years trying to make one indicator work when the data clearly shows it is trash. you have to drop the ego and realize that your intuition is probably your biggest liability. the secret to winning is iterating to success by testing a hundred ideas until you find the one that actually sticks. i call it the rbi system which stands for research backtest and implement. if you skip any of these steps you are just gambling with extra steps and the house always wins in the end research is where most traders get lazy because they just want a magic bot that prints money while they sleep. they go to youtube and find some guy promising a ninety percent win rate with a rsi crossover. that is not research that is falling for marketing fluff designed to sell you a dream. real research happens when you dive into white papers and study what the quants are actually doing on wall street. you look for market inefficiencies like liquidation clusters and cross exchange discrepancies that are hidden in plain sight. by the time you finish this process you should have a list of ideas that are grounded in reality instead of wishful thinking backtesting is the filter that saves you from losing your life savings on a bad hunch. most people use tools that repaint or give them false confidence because the data is not being handled correctly. if you are using a basic charting platform to see if your strategy works you are likely seeing a version of history that does not exist. you need to use raw python libraries like backtesting py to see the cold hard truth of how your logic would have performed. when you see a drawdown of thirty percent on paper you realize that using ten times leverage would have deleted your account five times over. the math does not lie and it is the only thing that can protect you from your own greed the most dangerous drug in the world is leverage because it makes you feel like a genius right before it makes you a pauper. i have watched two billion dollars get liquidated in a single day because people thought they could predict the bottom with fifty times leverage. the exchanges can see exactly where your liquidation price is and they have every incentive to push the price there to hunt your liquidity. you are playing in a casino where the house can see your cards and they are actively trying to take them from you. the only way to win is to stop playing their game and start using limit orders to save on the fees that are slowly bleeding you dry it is funny how much money people will spend on food and entertainment but they will hesitate to invest in their own education. they will spend a thousand dollars on a weekend out but will not put that same money into learning a skill that could provide for them for the rest of their lives. money is just a tool of exchange and it always replenishes if you are providing value to the world. if you spend your capital on knowledge you are buying back your time and your freedom. i decided to live my life on youtube and build in public because i wanted to show people that a regular guy could do this. now i have fully automated systems trading for me while i sleep and i never have to worry about getting licked by a sudden market move again chasing the greats like jim simons is not about the money it is about the mastery of the system. he ran up a net worth of over thirty billion dollars by doing exactly what we are talking about here. he did not stare at charts all day and hope for the best he built models that exploited the mathematical laws of the market. he was a scientist first and a trader second and that is the mindset you need to adopt. if you are not approaching this quantitatively you are just a gambler who happens to be sitting at a computer. the goal is to become a quant researcher who happens to have robots executing their findings the transition from hand trader to automated builder is the most liberating thing you can do for your mental health. you go from waking up in a cold sweat checking your phone to waking up and checking your logs to see how the system performed. even if the day was red you have data that tells you why and you can use that to make the system better tomorrow. it is a process of constant improvement and refinement that never really ends. you are building a legacy of code that will continue to work for you as long as the electricity is running. i am not afraid to die on a treadmill because i know that i will outwork anyone who is just looking for a shortcut if you are still on the fence about whether or not you can do this just remember that i was exactly where you are. i was losing money and feeling like the market was rigged against me because it actually was. i had to decide that i was going to change my environment and take control of my own destiny. you have the same opportunity right now to pivot and start building your own automated future. the models are getting better every single day and the barrier to entry is lower than it has ever been in human history. you just have to decide to lock in and do the work for a thousand days until you become undeniable there is no better feeling than finding a strategy that has a sharp ratio over ten and knowing that you built it with your own two hands. it is a moment of pure clarity where you realize that you are no longer a victim of the market. you are the architect of your own financial reality and the possibilities are literally endless. i am going to keep sharing everything i find because i believe that we can take on wall street together. as long as i am breathing i will be stepping on the gas and pushing the boundaries of what is possible with code. welcome to the family and let's get after it because the machines are already running and they are not waiting for anyone

Moon Dev

46,677 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public." ~Proctor's Response to Coulthart (Why am I spending more time on this? American Alchemy's video on the mummies has 904,000 views. @incredhistory's video has 5,500 views. The original, sensationalistic claims always do MUCH better than any evidence that is presented later that throws cold water on said claims. That's always been an issue. That could change if Jesse makes a short video on his YT channel right now, linked to the @incredhistory video, and implores his viewers to watch it with an open mind. And/or if he pins a tweet linking his X followers to the "Incredible History" analysis.) "At one point in time, I was truly wondering if these [mummies] were a new species." ~Accused Debunker, Will Brown 🙂 "It's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects." ~Ross Coulthart (After watching the new video by "Incredible History" and the interview done on "Weaponized," it's not too early for me (and MANY other people) to say I believe they're fake. Others felt they were fake right from the start but I wanted to wait for more evidence. We have that now. From yesterday's "Reality Check" with Coulthart and Meagan Medick.) Coulthart: "I think (the new @incredhistory video) is important. It raises... I've actually been in touch with the gentleman who made it, Will (Brown), and I'm hoping to some stage, talk to him. And I'd like to include what he says in any analysis that we do on NewsNation about the tridactals." (Who are the experts featured in the new "Incredible History" video segments that I clipped below? Dr. Daniel Proctor (Galaxopithecus), "has a PhD in bio-anthropology. Specifically, his area of focus is the hands and the feet. He has published papers on the evolution of the hands and the feet, including focusing of the ability to grasp." Dr. Joseph A.P. Wilson (Joseph A P Wilson), "earned his doctorate in anthropology from the University of Florida. he's current lecturer in archeology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and part time lecturer in anthropology at Fairfield University. And more importantly., before academia, he worked as a molecular genetic technologist at Greenwood Genetic Center in South Carolina." Michele - Mrs Anthrope (Radiographer) - Mrs. Anthrope The descriptions of their credentials is from the "Incredible History" video which I clipped a few segments from and included below.) ~More from Reality Check~ Coulthart: "We've filmed in Peru, and we've spoken directly with the doctors there. As I said in social media commentary that was posted before I left Peru, it's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects. I'm very careful not to even say, beings." (Again, after the seeing the "Incredible History" video, it shouldn't be too early to offer up a new opinion.) Coulthart: "I certainly got the impression from the CT tomography scans that they seemed like intact beings of some kind. But frankly, I'm not an anatomist. I'm not an anthropologist or anyone with any kind of experience in a scientific analysis of these beings. And I think we'll have to go with what good science says. And all the way through in this, what the scientists in Peru have told me, and what the scientists in America and indeed in Mexico have told me, is they want independent review. They want independent assessment. "And I guess what I'm a little worried about is the partisan way, the way that on UFO, UAP, Twitter, social media, people take their positions and adopt in a definitive position once and for all. This is a hoax, or this is real. Frankly, I just don't think we know enough right now. I don't think you can base a final conclusion on an analysis of a couple of bones in one alleged being's scans. I've heard arguments two and for." (With the new information, it's NOT "partisan" and I am NOT saying "once and for all." But I think the arguments for fraud put forth by "Incredible History" are pretty damning and are enough to show anybody with an open mind that there are massive problems with the hypothesis that these are non-human beings or...hybrids of humans and non-humans. It appears to be a done deal: aka Fake.) Coulthart: "What I think will be definitive, and I'm aware that there is a DNA analysis underway at the moment. I don't know the name of the institution in the United States that's doing it, but there is some kind of DNA analysis underway, which will hopefully provide us with more answers as to the genetic origins of whatever these objects are. And that should be coming out sometime this year, hopefully fairly early up. "Until then, yes, I do think that we should acknowledge that there's been some great work done to raise, I think, serious questions about the legitimacy or the authenticity of the beings or the objects, but let's keep an open mind and let's reward and applaud good science where it's done. "This isn't like some kind of wrestling bout. You know, there's not a winner or a loser." (The credibility of the non-human subject is in danger of being set back because so many people in this community want to believe so hard and will ignore anything that goes against those beliefs. If these, apparent, hoaxes are not called out and done so, forcefully, we're all going to lose.) Coulthart: "Science is an iterative process where people basically do an analysis and make an assessment. Let's make those assessments, do the independent work, make sure that independent scientists with rigor get peer reviewed and checked and assessed, and then we can come up with a judgment. "I think the real tragedy would be if these are, potentially, if they are significantly important objects that have, basically, been procured as part of Peru's natural, cultural, significant history, it would be really tragic if, because of a sweeping assertion that these are a hoax, that the entire thing is not taken seriously. I'm not so sure I can dismiss it out of hand just because of this latest debunk, but I'm very, very happy to let independent, rigorous science do the do the guesswork and do the analysis." ~ (Will Brown (@incredhistory) responded to Coulthart's take via a reply to Meagan Medick's post.) Will Brown: "Curious why you all didn’t give the same reaction to Jesse Michel's (Jesse Michels) bold proclamations in a video that received 200x the views mine did on YouTube? "Similar question for Jay Anderson’s (Jay Anderson) 'scientific proof' video which has 10X the views? "Perhaps it’s because those videos don’t throw a wrench in whatever it is you are working on? "…any and all documentaries and books moving forward should include Steve Mera's testimony about what’s actually going on in Palpa." ~ Will Brown: "Hey Ross Coulthart, I’m hoping you’ll correct yourself here. In this video you stated we only looked at scans for one of the 'beings.' That is false. The video covers Maria and Monseratt. The Podcast with Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell and George Knapp adds Paloma in addition to Maria and Monseratt... All of which have multiple signs of manipulation on hands and feet. "You told me you watched my video…you even said you thought it was excellent and that it brought up legitimate concerns. "Did you actually watch the video? "Your statements today make me believe that you didn’t watch at all." ~ (And here's Dr. Daniel Proctor's (Galaxopithecus) response to Coulthart, and others, who are holding out hope for new DNA analysis.) Proctor: "I want to respond to Ross Coulthart’s recent caution that we should be careful calling the Nazca mummies a 'hoax' because they might represent cultural heritage, and to his claim that DNA should be more definitive than anatomy. "Respectfully, this framing gets the issue backwards. "First, there is nothing new here. 'Maria' was introduced nearly a decade ago. She did not appear last year, or this year, or as some sudden scientific revelation. She has been circulating since roughly 2015–2016, and in that entire span she has never been properly documented in reputable osteological, archaeological, or forensic journals. There is no provenience, as they allegedly come from a cave from an undisclosed location. No controlled excavation, no chain of custody, no standard reports of any nature, and anonymous discoverer. "What we are actually seeing is a slow drip of bodies, which are always sensational, always just beyond proper access, always promoted as revolutionary, and always somehow unable to withstand normal scientific scrutiny. That pattern is not accidental. "Second, anatomy is not secondary evidence. "The idea that DNA should be privileged over gross anatomy in evaluating human remains is baffling. Anatomy is primary data. Bones do not lie about how they articulate. Hand bones do not mysteriously relocate into feet. Developmental biology places hard constraints on what a viable organism can look like. "DNA can tell you what tissue something came from, within the strict parameters for which the tests have been designed. No mainstream lab has tests for some hypothetical 'alien' DNA. "Anatomy tells you whether the body ever existed as a coherent organism. In this case, the anatomy alone demonstrates fabrication. That is not speculative. It is observable. "Third, the cultural-heritage argument is deeply ironic. "The Nazca mummy trade, because that is what this is, destroys real cultural heritage. Looting graves, ghoulishly disarticulating bodies, recombining bones, and fabricating specimens for sale and spectacle is the opposite of preservation. Calling attention to that destruction is not disrespectful, on the contrary, it is necessary. "We have seen this playbook before. The commercialization of mummies, the alienization of cranial modification, and the recycling of colonial myths about 'non-human' ancient peoples. 'None of this is new. 'What is new is the social-media amplification. "Which brings me to Ross’s discomfort with debunking (or defending) these claims on social media rather than in scientific venues. "Here’s the problem: this hoax does not live in scientific venues. "It never has. "It lives on YouTube, on X, on press conferences, in podcasts, and in staged congressional spectacles. It is an argument of persuasion, not evidence. Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public. "Finally, caution cuts both ways. Being 'diplomatic' toward a hoax that incentivizes grave robbery, fuels pseudoscience, and misrepresents Indigenous pasts does not protect heritage. It only enables its continued destruction."
8:29

"Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public." ~Proctor's Response to Coulthart (Why am I spending more time on this? American Alchemy's video on the mummies has 904,000 views. @incredhistory's video has 5,500 views. The original, sensationalistic claims always do MUCH better than any evidence that is presented later that throws cold water on said claims. That's always been an issue. That could change if Jesse makes a short video on his YT channel right now, linked to the @incredhistory video, and implores his viewers to watch it with an open mind. And/or if he pins a tweet linking his X followers to the "Incredible History" analysis.) "At one point in time, I was truly wondering if these [mummies] were a new species." ~Accused Debunker, Will Brown 🙂 "It's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects." ~Ross Coulthart (After watching the new video by "Incredible History" and the interview done on "Weaponized," it's not too early for me (and MANY other people) to say I believe they're fake. Others felt they were fake right from the start but I wanted to wait for more evidence. We have that now. From yesterday's "Reality Check" with Coulthart and Meagan Medick.) Coulthart: "I think (the new @incredhistory video) is important. It raises... I've actually been in touch with the gentleman who made it, Will (Brown), and I'm hoping to some stage, talk to him. And I'd like to include what he says in any analysis that we do on NewsNation about the tridactals." (Who are the experts featured in the new "Incredible History" video segments that I clipped below? Dr. Daniel Proctor (Galaxopithecus), "has a PhD in bio-anthropology. Specifically, his area of focus is the hands and the feet. He has published papers on the evolution of the hands and the feet, including focusing of the ability to grasp." Dr. Joseph A.P. Wilson (Joseph A P Wilson), "earned his doctorate in anthropology from the University of Florida. he's current lecturer in archeology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and part time lecturer in anthropology at Fairfield University. And more importantly., before academia, he worked as a molecular genetic technologist at Greenwood Genetic Center in South Carolina." Michele - Mrs Anthrope (Radiographer) - Mrs. Anthrope The descriptions of their credentials is from the "Incredible History" video which I clipped a few segments from and included below.) ~More from Reality Check~ Coulthart: "We've filmed in Peru, and we've spoken directly with the doctors there. As I said in social media commentary that was posted before I left Peru, it's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects. I'm very careful not to even say, beings." (Again, after the seeing the "Incredible History" video, it shouldn't be too early to offer up a new opinion.) Coulthart: "I certainly got the impression from the CT tomography scans that they seemed like intact beings of some kind. But frankly, I'm not an anatomist. I'm not an anthropologist or anyone with any kind of experience in a scientific analysis of these beings. And I think we'll have to go with what good science says. And all the way through in this, what the scientists in Peru have told me, and what the scientists in America and indeed in Mexico have told me, is they want independent review. They want independent assessment. "And I guess what I'm a little worried about is the partisan way, the way that on UFO, UAP, Twitter, social media, people take their positions and adopt in a definitive position once and for all. This is a hoax, or this is real. Frankly, I just don't think we know enough right now. I don't think you can base a final conclusion on an analysis of a couple of bones in one alleged being's scans. I've heard arguments two and for." (With the new information, it's NOT "partisan" and I am NOT saying "once and for all." But I think the arguments for fraud put forth by "Incredible History" are pretty damning and are enough to show anybody with an open mind that there are massive problems with the hypothesis that these are non-human beings or...hybrids of humans and non-humans. It appears to be a done deal: aka Fake.) Coulthart: "What I think will be definitive, and I'm aware that there is a DNA analysis underway at the moment. I don't know the name of the institution in the United States that's doing it, but there is some kind of DNA analysis underway, which will hopefully provide us with more answers as to the genetic origins of whatever these objects are. And that should be coming out sometime this year, hopefully fairly early up. "Until then, yes, I do think that we should acknowledge that there's been some great work done to raise, I think, serious questions about the legitimacy or the authenticity of the beings or the objects, but let's keep an open mind and let's reward and applaud good science where it's done. "This isn't like some kind of wrestling bout. You know, there's not a winner or a loser." (The credibility of the non-human subject is in danger of being set back because so many people in this community want to believe so hard and will ignore anything that goes against those beliefs. If these, apparent, hoaxes are not called out and done so, forcefully, we're all going to lose.) Coulthart: "Science is an iterative process where people basically do an analysis and make an assessment. Let's make those assessments, do the independent work, make sure that independent scientists with rigor get peer reviewed and checked and assessed, and then we can come up with a judgment. "I think the real tragedy would be if these are, potentially, if they are significantly important objects that have, basically, been procured as part of Peru's natural, cultural, significant history, it would be really tragic if, because of a sweeping assertion that these are a hoax, that the entire thing is not taken seriously. I'm not so sure I can dismiss it out of hand just because of this latest debunk, but I'm very, very happy to let independent, rigorous science do the do the guesswork and do the analysis." ~ (Will Brown (@incredhistory) responded to Coulthart's take via a reply to Meagan Medick's post.) Will Brown: "Curious why you all didn’t give the same reaction to Jesse Michel's (Jesse Michels) bold proclamations in a video that received 200x the views mine did on YouTube? "Similar question for Jay Anderson’s (Jay Anderson) 'scientific proof' video which has 10X the views? "Perhaps it’s because those videos don’t throw a wrench in whatever it is you are working on? "…any and all documentaries and books moving forward should include Steve Mera's testimony about what’s actually going on in Palpa." ~ Will Brown: "Hey Ross Coulthart, I’m hoping you’ll correct yourself here. In this video you stated we only looked at scans for one of the 'beings.' That is false. The video covers Maria and Monseratt. The Podcast with Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell and George Knapp adds Paloma in addition to Maria and Monseratt... All of which have multiple signs of manipulation on hands and feet. "You told me you watched my video…you even said you thought it was excellent and that it brought up legitimate concerns. "Did you actually watch the video? "Your statements today make me believe that you didn’t watch at all." ~ (And here's Dr. Daniel Proctor's (Galaxopithecus) response to Coulthart, and others, who are holding out hope for new DNA analysis.) Proctor: "I want to respond to Ross Coulthart’s recent caution that we should be careful calling the Nazca mummies a 'hoax' because they might represent cultural heritage, and to his claim that DNA should be more definitive than anatomy. "Respectfully, this framing gets the issue backwards. "First, there is nothing new here. 'Maria' was introduced nearly a decade ago. She did not appear last year, or this year, or as some sudden scientific revelation. She has been circulating since roughly 2015–2016, and in that entire span she has never been properly documented in reputable osteological, archaeological, or forensic journals. There is no provenience, as they allegedly come from a cave from an undisclosed location. No controlled excavation, no chain of custody, no standard reports of any nature, and anonymous discoverer. "What we are actually seeing is a slow drip of bodies, which are always sensational, always just beyond proper access, always promoted as revolutionary, and always somehow unable to withstand normal scientific scrutiny. That pattern is not accidental. "Second, anatomy is not secondary evidence. "The idea that DNA should be privileged over gross anatomy in evaluating human remains is baffling. Anatomy is primary data. Bones do not lie about how they articulate. Hand bones do not mysteriously relocate into feet. Developmental biology places hard constraints on what a viable organism can look like. "DNA can tell you what tissue something came from, within the strict parameters for which the tests have been designed. No mainstream lab has tests for some hypothetical 'alien' DNA. "Anatomy tells you whether the body ever existed as a coherent organism. In this case, the anatomy alone demonstrates fabrication. That is not speculative. It is observable. "Third, the cultural-heritage argument is deeply ironic. "The Nazca mummy trade, because that is what this is, destroys real cultural heritage. Looting graves, ghoulishly disarticulating bodies, recombining bones, and fabricating specimens for sale and spectacle is the opposite of preservation. Calling attention to that destruction is not disrespectful, on the contrary, it is necessary. "We have seen this playbook before. The commercialization of mummies, the alienization of cranial modification, and the recycling of colonial myths about 'non-human' ancient peoples. 'None of this is new. 'What is new is the social-media amplification. "Which brings me to Ross’s discomfort with debunking (or defending) these claims on social media rather than in scientific venues. "Here’s the problem: this hoax does not live in scientific venues. "It never has. "It lives on YouTube, on X, on press conferences, in podcasts, and in staged congressional spectacles. It is an argument of persuasion, not evidence. Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public. "Finally, caution cuts both ways. Being 'diplomatic' toward a hoax that incentivizes grave robbery, fuels pseudoscience, and misrepresents Indigenous pasts does not protect heritage. It only enables its continued destruction."

Joe Murgia

44,343 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten