Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

"tops/semes" have been doing cute performances long before this lineup existed. this isn't some new strategy exclusive to the current roster. cute stages, especially to girl group songs, have been part of idol culture for years because they're popular and trendy, not because they're inherently "feminine." yes, marketing exists.... no one is denying that. but marketing alone isn't evidence that a company is intentionally pushing a "fem × masc" dynamic or heteronormativity. those are conclusions that need evidence, not assumptions based on one performance. (why would we even based gender expression on performances?!?) people also keep treating every cute stage as if it automatically means the artists have no agency. unless there's actual evidence they're being forced, claiming they're uncomfortable is still speculation. ironically, that becomes another form of gender policing because u're deciding how they should express themselves based on the role they play. and what if they're genuinely comfortable and PROUD with those performances? like they work hard for it for months, imagine reading tweets insisting you're secretly being forced or that you should perform differently because you're the "top." that's still reducing people to seme/uke stereotypes instead of letting them express themselves however they want. if the goal is to challenge gender stereotypes, then replacing one expectation with is the same thing. freedom of expression means no one should have to prove their authenticity by performing more masculinity or more femininity or have to perform BOTH. whether it's for marketing or not, it's never the artists' fault. we shouldn't make assumptions that could end up hurting them, especially without evidence. at the end of the day, these are just stage performances not a measure of someone's gender expression, identity, or personal comfort. CREDITS : midorialien nx, arfo N. on ytshow more

vivian 🍉 | afk!

1,236 subscribers

25,345 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🦖: Regardless of who you are, I think that in these times, it is not something that causes harm. It is acceptable both within the heterosexual and LGBTQIA+ communities. However, I think it is about respecting personal space. On the subject of intercourse, it is highly private. It is not solely about gender. You need to be able to distinguish between them. Sexual orientation and gender expression do not always have to be in alignment. Sometimes, their gender expression goes one way because that’s how they feel comfortable expressing themselves. However, their sexual orientation is a personal matter. Therefore, you have no right to judge them because you cannot truly know what their sexual orientation is. Respect the way they express their gender. If they want to present as straight, you should respect that that’s how they want to express their gender, regardless of their role when it comes to intercourse. Similarly, if they want to express (their gender) as L G B T Q I A+, that is how they wish to present themselves. Whatever their role during intercourse is, you should not judge. Today, let’s say that I have stated that “I am L”, then you should respect my decision that I am L. You should not judge (my) role during intercourse because it is none of your business. It is a very personal matter. Another thing is it is something you can choose. Actually, this kind of thing depends on the agreement between two people. OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija

Sensitive content

🦖: Regardless of who you are, I think that in these times, it is not something that causes harm. It is acceptable both within the heterosexual and LGBTQIA+ communities. However, I think it is about respecting personal space. On the subject of intercourse, it is highly private. It is not solely about gender. You need to be able to distinguish between them. Sexual orientation and gender expression do not always have to be in alignment. Sometimes, their gender expression goes one way because that’s how they feel comfortable expressing themselves. However, their sexual orientation is a personal matter. Therefore, you have no right to judge them because you cannot truly know what their sexual orientation is. Respect the way they express their gender. If they want to present as straight, you should respect that that’s how they want to express their gender, regardless of their role when it comes to intercourse. Similarly, if they want to express (their gender) as L G B T Q I A+, that is how they wish to present themselves. Whatever their role during intercourse is, you should not judge. Today, let’s say that I have stated that “I am L”, then you should respect my decision that I am L. You should not judge (my) role during intercourse because it is none of your business. It is a very personal matter. Another thing is it is something you can choose. Actually, this kind of thing depends on the agreement between two people. OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija

𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐦.

132,904 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 JOE ROGAN ON THE YOUTUBE CENSORSHIP: "If you Google'd Rogan Trump you could only get clips, you couldn't find the full episode. We reached out to them, and they fixed it, but Elon was furious and contacted Daniel Ek at Spotify and they put it on X as well. Now it has more views than ever. You can't suppress shit. It doesn't work. People are going to realize what you're doing. This is 2024. If my video isn't trending, then what is? Why is my video not trending? If one show has 36 million downloads in one day, that's not trending? There's no way this was a mistake. It could have been a rogue engineer or something. They're desperate because they had no idea it was going to be that popular. It's a runaway train and they hate it because they're ideologically oppose to Trump being more popular. Mass reporting could also have done it, but that's a symptom of the left too."

🚨 JOE ROGAN ON THE YOUTUBE CENSORSHIP: "If you Google'd Rogan Trump you could only get clips, you couldn't find the full episode. We reached out to them, and they fixed it, but Elon was furious and contacted Daniel Ek at Spotify and they put it on X as well. Now it has more views than ever. You can't suppress shit. It doesn't work. People are going to realize what you're doing. This is 2024. If my video isn't trending, then what is? Why is my video not trending? If one show has 36 million downloads in one day, that's not trending? There's no way this was a mistake. It could have been a rogue engineer or something. They're desperate because they had no idea it was going to be that popular. It's a runaway train and they hate it because they're ideologically oppose to Trump being more popular. Mass reporting could also have done it, but that's a symptom of the left too."

Autism Capital 🧩

20,087,632 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: DEI and Wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism; they're also anti-meritocratic. “If by wokeism, one means just like racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, which DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society, where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory. So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant. It can't be that the government is deciding what is or is not misinformation or disinformation, because then you get politics applying to those labels, and in fact, you simply get the suppression of freedom of speech.”

Elon Musk: DEI and Wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism; they're also anti-meritocratic. “If by wokeism, one means just like racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, which DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society, where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory. So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant. It can't be that the government is deciding what is or is not misinformation or disinformation, because then you get politics applying to those labels, and in fact, you simply get the suppression of freedom of speech.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

22,743 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant

X Freeze

31,865 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Brad

35,334 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

Zack Snyder Film

22,225 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

How thoughtful Donghae is to his fans 🥹🩷 #DONGHAE #동해 D: Whether they (Fans) come from Seoul, or from Gwangju, or from Thailand, or South America, they spend that time to see this one performance. They're investing that time. Buying that ticket is exchanging it for an experience with me. They're spending that money to gain happiness. The money they worked hard to earn, they're exchanging it for an experience. Booking hotels and everything, thinking about all of those things, They spend hundreds of dollars to watch this performance, to buy their happiness. If we go out there and do a terrible job, no matter how much they're fans, they'll be disappointed, they will be disappointed. Accidents may happen, even though we should prevent them, but the way we can make people feel better is by working harder ourselves. Even on stage, if anyone can see that it's a mistake, and you're moving lazily, saying, "Let's take it easy because we're older," "Because we're older," "let's just take it easy today," I really think that makes no sense. I think people like that shouldn't be performing at all. In the end, being sincere, and doing your absolute best on stage, that's what creates the emotional impact.

How thoughtful Donghae is to his fans 🥹🩷 #DONGHAE #동해 D: Whether they (Fans) come from Seoul, or from Gwangju, or from Thailand, or South America, they spend that time to see this one performance. They're investing that time. Buying that ticket is exchanging it for an experience with me. They're spending that money to gain happiness. The money they worked hard to earn, they're exchanging it for an experience. Booking hotels and everything, thinking about all of those things, They spend hundreds of dollars to watch this performance, to buy their happiness. If we go out there and do a terrible job, no matter how much they're fans, they'll be disappointed, they will be disappointed. Accidents may happen, even though we should prevent them, but the way we can make people feel better is by working harder ourselves. Even on stage, if anyone can see that it's a mistake, and you're moving lazily, saying, "Let's take it easy because we're older," "Because we're older," "let's just take it easy today," I really think that makes no sense. I think people like that shouldn't be performing at all. In the end, being sincere, and doing your absolute best on stage, that's what creates the emotional impact.

byeol_별

22,546 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨RUBIO: USAID rife with “rank insubordination” — “we had no choice but to take dramatic steps to bring this thing under control." "They have basically evolved into an agency that believes that they're not even a U.S. government agency...they're completely unresponsive. They just don't consider that they work for the US." "They just think they're a global entity and that their master is the globe and not the United States. And that's not sustainable." “The goal was to reform it. But now we have rank insubordination. Their basic attitude is we don't work for anyone. We work for ourselves. No agency of government can tell us what to do." ."There are things that are happening at USAID that we should not be involved in funding and or that we have a lot of questions about, but they're completely uncooperative. So we had no choice but to take dramatic steps to bring this thing under control."

🚨RUBIO: USAID rife with “rank insubordination” — “we had no choice but to take dramatic steps to bring this thing under control." "They have basically evolved into an agency that believes that they're not even a U.S. government agency...they're completely unresponsive. They just don't consider that they work for the US." "They just think they're a global entity and that their master is the globe and not the United States. And that's not sustainable." “The goal was to reform it. But now we have rank insubordination. Their basic attitude is we don't work for anyone. We work for ourselves. No agency of government can tell us what to do." ."There are things that are happening at USAID that we should not be involved in funding and or that we have a lot of questions about, but they're completely uncooperative. So we had no choice but to take dramatic steps to bring this thing under control."

Western Lensman

1,689,350 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING - SHOCKING: Judge Juan Merchan just instructed the jury that they do not need unanimity to convict and do not need to agree on what specifically occurred. He said the prosecution's broad approach is due to the absence of direct evidence that Donald Trump personally recorded the material in question. "They're making this very expansive," CNN legal analyst said, "because they don't have direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that." WATCH She said, "Even if he himself did not falsify the business record, as long as, as they mentioned in the closing argument, if he made or caused the false entry. They're making this very expansive as part of the cast analogy. He doesn't have to be the person to have actually recorded it. That's very important because they don't have the direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that information. You have invoices, you've got ledgers, you've got checks. And so as long as he was a part of it to make or cause it, they could find, if they choose to, beyond a reasonable doubt."

BREAKING - SHOCKING: Judge Juan Merchan just instructed the jury that they do not need unanimity to convict and do not need to agree on what specifically occurred. He said the prosecution's broad approach is due to the absence of direct evidence that Donald Trump personally recorded the material in question. "They're making this very expansive," CNN legal analyst said, "because they don't have direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that." WATCH She said, "Even if he himself did not falsify the business record, as long as, as they mentioned in the closing argument, if he made or caused the false entry. They're making this very expansive as part of the cast analogy. He doesn't have to be the person to have actually recorded it. That's very important because they don't have the direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that information. You have invoices, you've got ledgers, you've got checks. And so as long as he was a part of it to make or cause it, they could find, if they choose to, beyond a reasonable doubt."

Simon Ateba

2,906,836 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“The Chinese are skeptical of our calls for international cooperation on AI. They think they're in a race with us. And if they think they're in a race with us, it's kind of hard for us not to be in a race with them. And that's just the way it is.” “And at the end of the day, the Chinese government is a dictatorship that's nationalist and socialist and doesn't really want to cooperate with us much. They want to beat us. They want to compete with us. So, we can try. It's worth trying.” “But the record shows, according to 100% of the evidence, that when you sign an AI or a nuclear or a cyber-hacking document with the Chinese government, it turns out not to be held up. It turns out that they're not actually trustworthy.”

“The Chinese are skeptical of our calls for international cooperation on AI. They think they're in a race with us. And if they think they're in a race with us, it's kind of hard for us not to be in a race with them. And that's just the way it is.” “And at the end of the day, the Chinese government is a dictatorship that's nationalist and socialist and doesn't really want to cooperate with us much. They want to beat us. They want to compete with us. So, we can try. It's worth trying.” “But the record shows, according to 100% of the evidence, that when you sign an AI or a nuclear or a cyber-hacking document with the Chinese government, it turns out not to be held up. It turns out that they're not actually trustworthy.”

Josh Rogin

24,251 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

SNYDER: You can't imagine Trump or Hegseth visiting Kyiv. It's not that it's not going to happen. It's just unimaginable. It's psychically impossible for them. They can't be in a world where people are actually taking real risks for real things. That would be too much for them. They can't be in a place where there is courage. That would be opposed to just manipulating the rest of us with words, which is designed to make them look tough. They'd never take any risk for anything themselves. They believe that all talk of patriotism, democracy is just for show. These are people who fundamentally will just tell you what you want to hear in order to get what they want personally. For them, whole idea of democracy, and even national sovereignty, is all just a joke, right? Just a means to an end. When they're confronted by others for whom democracy or national sovereignty isn't a joke, who would fight for freedom. Not just use words like "fight for freedom," but who would, like Ukraine, do it, when they're confronted and are doing it. Have been doing it for 4 and a half years now, they don't have a way to respond besides scorn, spite, and dismissal. That's the only thing they can do, because they're in a world where those are all words, and it's all just words. When they're confronted with actual human beings, men and women who are actually taking risks, they're helpless. They have to get that topic off the table. They're only comfortable in a world where everybody is venal and hypocritical. Where everybody lies all the time. And so I think that's the fundamental thing: it's just really uncomfortable for them.

SNYDER: You can't imagine Trump or Hegseth visiting Kyiv. It's not that it's not going to happen. It's just unimaginable. It's psychically impossible for them. They can't be in a world where people are actually taking real risks for real things. That would be too much for them. They can't be in a place where there is courage. That would be opposed to just manipulating the rest of us with words, which is designed to make them look tough. They'd never take any risk for anything themselves. They believe that all talk of patriotism, democracy is just for show. These are people who fundamentally will just tell you what you want to hear in order to get what they want personally. For them, whole idea of democracy, and even national sovereignty, is all just a joke, right? Just a means to an end. When they're confronted by others for whom democracy or national sovereignty isn't a joke, who would fight for freedom. Not just use words like "fight for freedom," but who would, like Ukraine, do it, when they're confronted and are doing it. Have been doing it for 4 and a half years now, they don't have a way to respond besides scorn, spite, and dismissal. That's the only thing they can do, because they're in a world where those are all words, and it's all just words. When they're confronted with actual human beings, men and women who are actually taking risks, they're helpless. They have to get that topic off the table. They're only comfortable in a world where everybody is venal and hypocritical. Where everybody lies all the time. And so I think that's the fundamental thing: it's just really uncomfortable for them.

Kate from Kharkiv

170,895 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Catherine Austin Fitts on the Navy "murdering" its sailors with mRNA flu jabs⚓️💉🩸 "it's murder. It's mass atrocity... it appears [they] don't want to win the war. Either that or [they're] depending on the mRNA technology for mind control" "why would you do that? Especially after Hagseth came out and said, We're not going to mandate that. Now [they're] overriding religious exemptions again" "so, if they are poisoning the U.S. sailors, that's because they want to. The question is, do they want to kill them? Do they want to weaken them or do they want to mind control them or all three?" "But that's not playing to win. If you want to win wars, that's not how you win. We have sailors jumping off because the fleet in the straits is not there blockading the straits. They're hostage. They're being held hostage there" "We could get food in there. We can helicopter food in. You know, we can get food to those guys. We don't have to have them committing suicide because they can't stand it" Shannon Joy The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

Catherine Austin Fitts on the Navy "murdering" its sailors with mRNA flu jabs⚓️💉🩸 "it's murder. It's mass atrocity... it appears [they] don't want to win the war. Either that or [they're] depending on the mRNA technology for mind control" "why would you do that? Especially after Hagseth came out and said, We're not going to mandate that. Now [they're] overriding religious exemptions again" "so, if they are poisoning the U.S. sailors, that's because they want to. The question is, do they want to kill them? Do they want to weaken them or do they want to mind control them or all three?" "But that's not playing to win. If you want to win wars, that's not how you win. We have sailors jumping off because the fleet in the straits is not there blockading the straits. They're hostage. They're being held hostage there" "We could get food in there. We can helicopter food in. You know, we can get food to those guys. We don't have to have them committing suicide because they can't stand it" Shannon Joy The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

Sense Receptor

13,405 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Tucker Carlson about immigration: ”They're not doing this to China, Africa or the Middle East. They're not saying those nations need to invite a lot of people from different parts of the world. It's only one side. It's anti-Western. They're saying that there's something about a majority White Christian country that's inherently threatening, so we're going to destroy it. And that is exactly what they have done around the world. They're not screaming at Chairman Xi to let in a bunch of people from Nigeria. It's not even on the table. They're not demanding Japan do that. It's just Canada, UK, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand.”

Tucker Carlson about immigration: ”They're not doing this to China, Africa or the Middle East. They're not saying those nations need to invite a lot of people from different parts of the world. It's only one side. It's anti-Western. They're saying that there's something about a majority White Christian country that's inherently threatening, so we're going to destroy it. And that is exactly what they have done around the world. They're not screaming at Chairman Xi to let in a bunch of people from Nigeria. It's not even on the table. They're not demanding Japan do that. It's just Canada, UK, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand.”

Taya

30,077 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The medical industrial complex for DECADES has tried to bury anyone who disagrees with the narrative that there’s absolutely no link between vaccines and autism. That’s why they don’t want you to know that even a former NIH director, Dr. Bernadine Healy, disagreed! “We do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically… that makes them more susceptible to vaccines plural, or to one particular vaccine, or to a component of a vaccine, like mercury.” “The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they were afraid that if they found them, however baked or small they were, that that would scare the public away.” “The more you delve into it, if you look at the basic science… and if you look at the evidence that there is no link, what I come away with is the question has not been answered.”

The medical industrial complex for DECADES has tried to bury anyone who disagrees with the narrative that there’s absolutely no link between vaccines and autism. That’s why they don’t want you to know that even a former NIH director, Dr. Bernadine Healy, disagreed! “We do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically… that makes them more susceptible to vaccines plural, or to one particular vaccine, or to a component of a vaccine, like mercury.” “The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they were afraid that if they found them, however baked or small they were, that that would scare the public away.” “The more you delve into it, if you look at the basic science… and if you look at the evidence that there is no link, what I come away with is the question has not been answered.”

Children’s Health Defense

20,452 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

MIND BLOWN 💥 🤯 “You wanna know what I just realized about all the legislation that's being passed. Literally, all of it is to stop a revolution” - “We got the 702 bill, which allows them to go through our text messages and make sure we're not colluding with foreign adversaries, but they're also looking for words like revolution - We have the Bill (S.3589 - Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act of 2024) that stops us if there's more than a million people talking about one topic or assembling. It's illegal, which isn't even the right term because they're passing statutes and regulations. They're not passing laws. - Banning TikTok because TikTok is our only access to uncensored information. We get to see people on the f*cking ground where the shit is happening, telling us what's actually happening. So the story that they spinning doesn't work anymore. Nobody's going to the news outlets. Nobody's looking at the newspaper because we all see that it's propaganda now. Do you know what that tells me? That either we're about to find out something that they have been doing that directly affects us, which is literally every f*cking thing that they've been doing. Or they're about to do something so drastic that it's gonna cause for us to uprise. Now it could have something to do with that guy burning himself alive in front of the Trump, um, trial in New York. He was basically saying they're running a Ponzi scheme allegedly using Bitcoin. So you're putting your money into Bitcoin. They're going on the back end and taking your money out. So eventually, Bitcoin, cryptocurrency is gonna crash because there's no money in it. Now that doesn't surprise me because they are doing the same thing with our retirement plans, with our 401ks, and the trust funds that half of us don't know that we got. - They're worried about a million of us standing up. What could they possibly be doing? Drop your thoughts in the comments.”

MIND BLOWN 💥 🤯 “You wanna know what I just realized about all the legislation that's being passed. Literally, all of it is to stop a revolution” - “We got the 702 bill, which allows them to go through our text messages and make sure we're not colluding with foreign adversaries, but they're also looking for words like revolution - We have the Bill (S.3589 - Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act of 2024) that stops us if there's more than a million people talking about one topic or assembling. It's illegal, which isn't even the right term because they're passing statutes and regulations. They're not passing laws. - Banning TikTok because TikTok is our only access to uncensored information. We get to see people on the fcking ground where the shit is happening, telling us what's actually happening. So the story that they spinning doesn't work anymore. Nobody's going to the news outlets. Nobody's looking at the newspaper because we all see that it's propaganda now. Do you know what that tells me? That either we're about to find out something that they have been doing that directly affects us, which is literally every fcking thing that they've been doing. Or they're about to do something so drastic that it's gonna cause for us to uprise. Now it could have something to do with that guy burning himself alive in front of the Trump, um, trial in New York. He was basically saying they're running a Ponzi scheme allegedly using Bitcoin. So you're putting your money into Bitcoin. They're going on the back end and taking your money out. So eventually, Bitcoin, cryptocurrency is gonna crash because there's no money in it. Now that doesn't surprise me because they are doing the same thing with our retirement plans, with our 401ks, and the trust funds that half of us don't know that we got. - They're worried about a million of us standing up. What could they possibly be doing? Drop your thoughts in the comments.”

Wall Street Apes

1,952,227 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says the left and right are converging: "The functional allies of our adversaries now, who claim to want these progressive things—both far-right and far-left, which are actually structurally very similar—are helping to fight for structures that would not include anyone like them." "I want a society where it is: the best people succeed." "There's a right of free speech, whether you like the person or not." "There's a right of privacy, whether you like the person or not." "There's a right to put checks on the government, whether they like you or not." "The people who are working the hardest to destroy those concepts, and are the most effective in destroying those concepts, call themselves progressive. They're not progressive. "Or they call themselves, super far right. They're not even right-wing." "The people on the far left, and the people I hung out with in the Frankfurt School, which was left of center of where I was—true progressives—would be somewhat not amused to know that the actual philosophical background of most modern non-progressive progressives is not Marx, it's Heidegger." "They're not actually left-wing. They're actually asking for things that are classically right-wing." "What are those things? They're asking for: we all get to be the same. We're all defined by who we are, by how we were born, or what we impute ourselves to be. There are only rights for a sector of people. The rights do not apply to people who are not like us because of wealth or because they think differently, and that we want a society that essentially looks communal." "These are like prototypical, non-progressive, classically right-wing thoughts just reapplied to people who call themselves progressive." "That's the society that Palantir and I are effectively working against." "By giving people more sovereignty, whether they believe it or not, protecting people from terrorism with civil liberties, by making businesses wealthier and better, where the businesses keep their actual alpha, and by helping Ukraine, Israel, and America establish a dominant position." Via Mathias Döpfner

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says the left and right are converging: "The functional allies of our adversaries now, who claim to want these progressive things—both far-right and far-left, which are actually structurally very similar—are helping to fight for structures that would not include anyone like them." "I want a society where it is: the best people succeed." "There's a right of free speech, whether you like the person or not." "There's a right of privacy, whether you like the person or not." "There's a right to put checks on the government, whether they like you or not." "The people who are working the hardest to destroy those concepts, and are the most effective in destroying those concepts, call themselves progressive. They're not progressive. "Or they call themselves, super far right. They're not even right-wing." "The people on the far left, and the people I hung out with in the Frankfurt School, which was left of center of where I was—true progressives—would be somewhat not amused to know that the actual philosophical background of most modern non-progressive progressives is not Marx, it's Heidegger." "They're not actually left-wing. They're actually asking for things that are classically right-wing." "What are those things? They're asking for: we all get to be the same. We're all defined by who we are, by how we were born, or what we impute ourselves to be. There are only rights for a sector of people. The rights do not apply to people who are not like us because of wealth or because they think differently, and that we want a society that essentially looks communal." "These are like prototypical, non-progressive, classically right-wing thoughts just reapplied to people who call themselves progressive." "That's the society that Palantir and I are effectively working against." "By giving people more sovereignty, whether they believe it or not, protecting people from terrorism with civil liberties, by making businesses wealthier and better, where the businesses keep their actual alpha, and by helping Ukraine, Israel, and America establish a dominant position." Via Mathias Döpfner

Jawwwn

13,461 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

ELON CLIPS

17,166 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten