正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Torns IF have developed an ingenious method to create one-on-ones with the goalkeeper. It's based on a rule found on page 93 in the Laws of the Game stating that “The first point of contact of the ‘play’ or ‘touch’ of the ball” should be used when judging offside. Groundbreaking.

1,064,796 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Torns IF 的头像
Torns IF2 年前

, @paternnais, @DanielLuthereau and all our other French supporters: Your favourite Torn player Ludde Bergman, aka "Le Grinch", is now in the initial phase of a promising acting career.

Björn (cooper) 的头像
Björn (cooper)2 年前

Hier kannst du dir noch was abschauen @FMzweierkette ;)

José Xavier 的头像
José Xavier2 年前

That is awesome. 5 stars for the humor. 😂😂😂

Persler 的头像
Persler2 年前

Fina vimplen bakom Kalle 💙🤍

jR 的头像
jR2 年前

Haha älskar detta konto

Fabrizio🍾🤷🏻‍♂️ 的头像
Fabrizio🍾🤷🏻‍♂️2 年前

@massefella un club di terza divisione sta facendo cambiare le regole del fuorigioco 👏🏻👏🏻

Dom_Monta 的头像
Dom_Monta2 年前

Sweden, football AND fun facts. If this video is not a perfect match for @rasmusaberg I don't know what is (ok beers are missing)

Paul Cohen 的头像
Paul Cohen2 年前

Mycket trafik på reddit nu också: Har vi nått peak TornsIF nu, eller kommer TornsIF bara öka och bli hetare än cryptovaluta?

Frosty 的头像
Frosty2 年前

geniuses

相关视频

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,312 次观看 • 14 天前