Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Torns IF have developed an ingenious method to create one-on-ones with the goalkeeper. It's based on a rule found on page 93 in the Laws of the Game stating that “The first point of contact of the ‘play’ or ‘touch’ of the ball” should be used when judging offside. Groundbreaking.

1,065,109 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Torns IF's profile picture
Torns IF3 years ago

, @paternnais, @DanielLuthereau and all our other French supporters: Your favourite Torn player Ludde Bergman, aka "Le Grinch", is now in the initial phase of a promising acting career.

Björn (cooper)'s profile picture
Björn (cooper)3 years ago

Hier kannst du dir noch was abschauen @FMzweierkette ;)

José Xavier's profile picture
José Xavier3 years ago

That is awesome. 5 stars for the humor. 😂😂😂

Persler's profile picture
Persler3 years ago

Fina vimplen bakom Kalle 💙🤍

jR's profile picture
jR3 years ago

Haha älskar detta konto

Fabrizio🍾🤷🏻‍♂️'s profile picture
Fabrizio🍾🤷🏻‍♂️3 years ago

@massefella un club di terza divisione sta facendo cambiare le regole del fuorigioco 👏🏻👏🏻

Dom_Monta's profile picture
Dom_Monta3 years ago

Sweden, football AND fun facts. If this video is not a perfect match for @rasmusaberg I don't know what is (ok beers are missing)

Paul Cohen's profile picture
Paul Cohen3 years ago

Mycket trafik på reddit nu också: Har vi nått peak TornsIF nu, eller kommer TornsIF bara öka och bli hetare än cryptovaluta?

Frosty's profile picture
Frosty3 years ago

geniuses

Related Videos

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,462 views • 2 months ago