Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

⚠️TOTAL CHIMP OUT⚠️ 🐒🦍 Another psychotic nigger goes totally apeshit when confronted by law enforcement. Complete with all the stereotypical defensive tactics and claims, instinctively used by insufferable low IQ niggers everywhere. 🙄 On the phone, leave me alone, don't touch me, I didn du nuffin, I can't see,...

27,706 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

You can't reject peace, choose hostility, and still expect the world to see you as the victim. The incident began when an officer pulls 22 year old India Mixon over after running her license plate and finding that her registration/license is suspended. When the officer approaches her vehicle, Mixon immediately becomes defensive, arguing that she just sent out a check to resolve the issue. The officer repeatedly asks to see her driver's license and proof of insurance, explaining that he is conducting a traffic stop and needs to identify her. Mixon refuses to cooperate or hand over her ID, claiming she does not have to produce it, and instead focuses on calling her case manager on her phone. ​As Mixon continues to refuse to identify herself, the officer warns her that she will be arrested if she does not cooperate. She is seen repeatedly reaching around the interior of her car, despite multiple commands from the officer to stop. After several minutes of non-compliance, the officer orders her out of the vehicle. When she refuses to step out, the officer opens the car door and physically removes her to place her in handcuffs. Mixon resists and accuses the officers of targeting her because of her race. Additional officers arrive on the scene to assist. Mixon becomes increasingly hysterical, claims that she is homeless and that all of her belongings are inside the vehicle, which is being prepared for towing due to the suspended registration. Mixon as$aults one of the officers and winds up having a "spit hood" secured over her head. In the end, she is charged with driving under suspension, simple assault, and as$ault on a police officer and her car was towed.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

265,199 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Off duty officer had to chase shoplifter though the store only to get sprayed as the criminal makes their escape. ​An off-duty police officer working security at a department store was alerted to an active shoplifting incident. The officer confronted a female suspect near the exit doors as she attempted to leave with a large bag of unpurchased merchandise. When the officer tried to detain her, a struggle ensued. The suspect broke free, ran through the store aisles, and fled into the parking lot. ​The officer pursued the suspect to a parked white sedan. As he attempted to pull her from the driver’s seat to place her under arrest, the woman produced a can of pepper spray and sprayed the officer This allowed her to put the vehicle in reverse, navigate out of the space, and flee the scene. However, during the initial struggle, she dropped her purse, leaving her identification behind for investigators. ​Officers deployed to the address listed on her ID. Upon arrival, they witnessed the woman pulling up to drop off a young child. Spotting the police presence, she immediately took off again, initiating a secondary high-speed pursuit. During the chase, the suspect reached reckless speeds of up to 100 mph. ​The pursuit finally ended in a residential neighborhood after the suspect lost control of the vehicle, nearly driving it into a local retention pond and drainage ditch. She was quickly apprehended by responding officers in a nearby grassy area. ​While detained, the suspect admitted her actions were reckless but claimed she only used the spray because she felt the initial off-duty officer had been too rough. She was booked into custody and formally charged with Shoplifting, Felony Obstruction of Law Enforcement, and multiple traffic offenses stemming from the pursuit. How did you feel about how the officer at the end was speaking with her? Was he feeding into her story just to get her to admit more, or was he agreeing with her excuses of why she acted the way she did?

Giggling Ganon

55,393 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This level of entitlement shows no bounds... Inside a holding area, a male police officer confronted a handcuffed woman sitting on a bench. He asks her directly, "Why do you steal?" to which she adamantly demands that only female officers handle her case, yelling, "I want a woman to touch me. Woman only!" The male officer agrees to accommodate her request for a female officer but notes that she needs to wear a protective mesh hood first. He places a spit hood (a breathable fabric hood used by law enforcement to protect officers from being b!tten or spit on) over her head. ​A female officer enters to take over the interaction. The woman becomes significantly calmer with her, allowing the female officer to touch her hair and adjust the hood. During this time, the suspect launches into an aggressive verbal rant directed at the male officer, making highly personal insults and accusations regarding his personal life and consent. When the female officer asks her to stand up and walk to another room, the suspect refuses, claiming she cannot move because she is in handcuffs. She then k!cks out her leg at the female officer. ​Because of her physical non-compliance and lashing out, the male officer steps back in to physically lift and secure her. ​The suspect begins screaming and resisting, shouting at him to get his hands off of her. After the struggle, the woman ends up on the floor. The officers explain that they have to get her off the ground so she doesn't hit her head. The suspect openly states: "I don't trust any of them except the black guy." ​A Black officer steps over to assist her, prompting her to reiterate, "I hate white men," multiple times as they successfully lift her back up and continue the booking process. This clip perfectly captures the staggering level of entitlement and delusion some people carry into a jail cell. ​Despite being arrested for theft and actively fighting the booking process, she somehow believes she is in a position to demand a bespoke, customized booking experience. She flips seamlessly from hurling deeply personal, unhinged insults about consent at a male officer, to weaponizing raw racism the second a Black officer steps in to help her off the floor. ​The irony of a white woman screaming "I hate white men" and dropping blatant racial preferences while being restrained for kicking a female officer is as hypocritical as it is exhausting. It is a textbook display of a chaotic, entitled suspect trying—and completely failing—to dictate the rules to the very people holding the handcuffs.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

91,806 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Albuquerque, New Mexico — Police received a call from an employee at a gas station who said a vehicle had been parked at the gas pump for several hours. The caller said the vehicle was not running, and she could barely see the driver because of the dark, tinted windows. She asked for officers to check on the driver. Officers arrived and ran the license plate and determined the registered owner of the car was Keshawn Thomas. Officers discovered the driver, later confirmed to be Thomas, was asleep in the driver’s seat of the vehicle. Officers noticed alcohol, including an open container, inside the vehicle. They determined that since the vehicle was not running, they did not have charges for drunk driving. Officers decided they would tell Thomas he needed to have someone come and pick up the car. They woke Thomas and asked him to exit the vehicle and take a seat. They told Thomas not to start the car and told him he was not in trouble. Thomas exited the vehicle but declined to sit down. An officer asked Thomas what he was doing with open containers in the car and pointed out he was drunk, and had been passed out for several hours. Officers later told investigators that they detected signs of intoxication during the encounter. An officer told him he should not be driving drunk because he could hurt himself or others. Thomas and officers argued with each other, and as the conversation became more heated, an additional officer was requested for assistance. Thomas sat in the driver’s seat of his vehicle with the door open and appeared to be searching the interior of the car. Officers directed him to get his phone and exit the vehicle. After about 30 second, one of the officers called out that Thomas had a gun. All three officers fired their handguns, striking Thomas. He died at the scene.

Damon Strong

137,555 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

What I saw was an ICE vehicle attempting to leave an area that was in a near riot condition, a civilian vehicle then suddenly moved in front of it to block its departure. I then saw an ICE officer approach that vehicle and issue a lawful order to the driver to get out of the car. Instead of complying with that order, the driver backed up, pointed the car in the direction of another officer, and then shifted into drive, stepping on the gas while an officer had his hand on the door then accelerated in the direction of the other ICE officer at the moment he fired into the vehicle. That’s what the video shows, and we all have eyes and we all can see it. There are a lot of questions that it raises, starting with the perspective of the officer who fired at this approaching vehicle. Was the car indeed pointed directly at him when he fired? It certainly appeared that way to me from the video we’ve seen. I assume the officer was wearing a body camera and we’ll get a better idea of his perspective in the course of the investigation. There’s the question of why the driver attempted to block the ICE vehicle as it was leaving, why the driver felt motivated to obstruct clearly uniformed federal law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties, why she willfully refused to comply with a lawful order by those officers, and why she pointed her vehicle toward another officer while hitting the gas. I suspect that a great deal of motivation was exactly from the kind of incendiary rhetoric we hear everyday from our radical democratic colleagues. It is a direct attack on the rule of law. Our ICE officers are enforcing federal law as the Congress wrote it. The Democrats here don’t like that law, they object to its enforcement, and they are actively encouraging citizens to obstruct its enforcement. In a nation of laws, the answer is not to obstruct the law, but to change it. We’re sitting in the very institution that writes these laws. If they believe the laws that enforce our nations sovereignty are wrong? Then they should make the case to change them. And Ms. Ross, I point out that when the Democrats had the majority and our nation was suffering through the worst illegal mass migration in its history, the immigration subcommittee under Democratic control held not a single hearing on that crisis as it unfolded, not one. I suspect their encouragement of disobedience to the law had a large role to play in the mind of the driver and in the minds of the increasingly violent mobs that our colleagues are deliberately inciting. As Lincoln said to their predecessors, “There is no grievance is a fit object for redress by mob law.” How sad the same words need to be repeated here. Before the House Judiciary Committee that’s supposed to be dedicated to the rule of law.

Tom McClintock

354,708 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten