Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨Tracey Martin issues a statement to Candace Owens regarding her Daily Mail claims🚨 “For the record: Candace Owens publicly identified me on X as the "source" and "family friend" behind a Daily Mail article. That statement is unequivocally false. After the article was published, revised, and republished by the...

162,256 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

73 Yorum

Perseus Novum profil fotoğrafı
Perseus Novum1 ay önce

Oh Killer - maybe she can also confirm that Candace wasn't the source which was Mr. Kolvet's bulsht. Quicker the TPUSA dopes stop lying, the quicker we get over dumb stories like this.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

Candace can email them herself.

ExcuseMe4BeingBlunt✨ profil fotoğrafı
ExcuseMe4BeingBlunt✨1 ay önce

So someone DID actually went to them to rat Erika out? 😂 Got it! How many moles are within her circle 🤔😏 Either way, it just made Erika looked sooo 2 faced. It was hilarious.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

How is Tracey suppose to know anything about it besides the fact that she wasn’t involved and that Erika doesn’t speak like that? What should the email have said? Lol.

ExcuseMe4BeingBlunt✨ profil fotoğrafı
ExcuseMe4BeingBlunt✨1 ay önce

Tbh, I don’t care a hoot about Eyebrow Tracy 🤣 You guys are missing the point. Someone from Scarika’s friends or family showed EF’s true colors. Honestly, who doesn’t swear at home when angry? Now she can’t even own it bc it breaks the whole public persona she wants to portray.

Cristina Crisp profil fotoğrafı
Cristina Crisp1 ay önce

I don’t believe a word that comes out of this woman’s mouth. Not a single one.

Monica Rodewald profil fotoğrafı
Monica Rodewald1 ay önce

It’s amazing how ppl will not believe Tracey, Erika’s best friend but they believe Candace who never backs up what she says. It’s sad how ppl are treating Tracey. I think it was @RealCandaceO and her team are source behind the DM article!! Candace is so twisted and spiteful 💯

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

@RealCandaceO Right? This isn’t about truth. People are just believing what they have already decided they want to believe

Monica Rodewald profil fotoğrafı
Monica Rodewald1 ay önce

@RealCandaceO I know, It’s really frustrating at this point because they’re always so condescending about it too.

Monica Rodewald profil fotoğrafı
Monica Rodewald1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT @RealCandaceO After 11 months of accusations and insinuations that they still haven’t been backed up with any proof that anyone they’ve accused were involved or that they’ve done anything wrong. So calling this the truth m, is insane! What they’re doing is quite the opposite! Heroes 😅😂

DJ Bobby Productions profil fotoğrafı
DJ Bobby Productions1 ay önce

You could twist this and say you had lunch with Ben for $10k!

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

🤣

Chrispy profil fotoğrafı
Chrispy1 ay önce

Tracy is vile!

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

Explain why

clover💚 profil fotoğrafı
clover💚1 ay önce

@ballhog34 For starters, she put a video of her young, preteen daughter topless on her social media with a man blow drying her hair. Thats vile and inexcusable.

clover💚 profil fotoğrafı
clover💚1 ay önce

@ballhog34 ALLEGEDLY 😂

Chrispy profil fotoğrafı
Chrispy1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT 100% Allegedly

Erik Pierson profil fotoğrafı
Erik Pierson1 ay önce

Let’s see this public sharing you refer to. I believe i am caught up and have yet to see Candace throw anyone under the bus. Just her usual pointing out of the obvious disconnects that only the evil folks at the Daily Mail can dream up. Interesting you stepped up to be the person they hoped Candace would be silly enough to blame.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

Candace did say it was Tracey, Iol. What are you talking about?

Erik Pierson profil fotoğrafı
Erik Pierson1 ay önce

Based on what you read, That would in turn mean I am asking for the sharing where her name was said … please provide. As I said, I thought i was caught up. Please confirm the comprehension part of your reading.

CUBAN AMERICAN GIRL 🇺🇸🇨🇺♥️🤍💙 profil fotoğrafı
CUBAN AMERICAN GIRL 🇺🇸🇨🇺♥️🤍💙1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT @SarcasticLiberT will not respond. That’s the way they operate.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

@ErikEPierson I did respond. I’m just not on X every last second

Almost Graceful profil fotoğrafı
Almost Graceful1 ay önce

@BrysonGray Oh she’s still trying to stay relevant?

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

@BrysonGray Some people value facts. I don’t expect to understand

🦅 AlaskaBird (anti-commie) #2/92🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
🦅 AlaskaBird (anti-commie) #2/92🇺🇸1 ay önce

I really really really hope she recorded that conversation and we’re going to get to hear it soon.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

She did.

Pam #RINO'sSuck profil fotoğrafı
Pam #RINO'sSuck1 ay önce

Ask for a full retraction.. Ask that the whole story be removed. Sue them for defamation. You said none of it was true, so ask that it be removed.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

You think Tracey should ask for that? The story doesn’t name her, Candace did.

Informerhub profil fotoğrafı
Informerhub1 ay önce

Candace and her team were the source for DailyMail claim. That’s how vile she is.

MrNoBull profil fotoğrafı
MrNoBull1 ay önce

Her word isn't good enough. Have any actual evidence?

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

How does one prove a negative?

MrNoBull profil fotoğrafı
MrNoBull1 ay önce

I don't know but your biased so your opinion really doesn't matter. No amount of truth from Candace would convince you because truth isn't what you are seeking.

👁️👁️its just me looking profil fotoğrafı
👁️👁️its just me looking1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT lol I don’t think you realize just how much you divulged about yourself with this comment. Candace really does draw in the crazies 🤦🏻‍♀️

MrNoBull profil fotoğrafı
MrNoBull1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT Do your 83 followers agree with you?

Chuck Herbert profil fotoğrafı
Chuck Herbert1 ay önce

@itsyooneverno @SarcasticLiberT And you have 95....its like two retard bots fighting eachother....lol. For the record, no one believes Tracey...but it would go a long way towards her credibility if DM did issue that statement....BET

👁️👁️its just me looking profil fotoğrafı
👁️👁️its just me looking1 ay önce

@BullForceOne @SarcasticLiberT You look like something my dog coughed up.

MrNoBull profil fotoğrafı
MrNoBull1 ay önce

@ChuckHerbert @SarcasticLiberT That landed flat. Try again.

Erikaaa profil fotoğrafı
Erikaaa1 ay önce

Boom. 💥

bruce baxter profil fotoğrafı
bruce baxter1 ay önce

She didn’t say definitively it was Tracey Martin you dingleberries… she said she believed she was given her past record noting similarities to the US weekly article…. You people are truly dumb

Cognidiss profil fotoğrafı
Cognidiss1 ay önce

Until daily mail issue a retraction of the story and apologizes for “making it up” , forced by turning point lawyers then I believe Candence

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

Well, that would assume Tracey knows for a fact that DM made the story up. Maybe they did. Maybe some rando pretended to be connected and contact them. Maybe Candace planted the story. Who knows. All she knows is that she wasn’t the source and that Erika doesn’t speak that way.

Cognidiss profil fotoğrafı
Cognidiss1 ay önce

Why haven’t they taken legal action against them? It makes no sense.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

Why isn’t TPUSA suing Daily Mail? What’s there to sue them for regarding this? For publishing a story with an unconfirmed source?

Edward Hubert profil fotoğrafı
Edward Hubert1 ay önce

@Cognidisso Obviously they trust the proven lier, Candace, because they believe everything she says. They are the literal definition of cult. She could tell them she is god and they would bow. One brain cell among them would be generous.

Cognidiss profil fotoğrafı
Cognidiss1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT Edward we see you are some of the stupidest people in the world, that assuming that you are not bots. It literally scientifically impossible for a .30-06 round to not go through his neck. So you go against the laws of physics , who is the flat earther in this debate then??

Edward Hubert profil fotoğrafı
Edward Hubert1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT So your believe is that it always exists even though there are numerous instances that it hasn't exited. So explain how the fragment was found in his neck and damaged his spine in 4-5 vertebrates then. So what's your theory how Charlie died? Be specific as possible.

Cognidiss profil fotoğrafı
Cognidiss1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT I don’t need to go beyond this point. I witness with my own eyes Charlie neck get hit. I know based on the laws of physics that a .30-06 cannot do what I personally observed with me eyes. So that means there is ANOTHER explanation. Period.

Raven profil fotoğrafı
Raven1 ay önce

And if they don’t then we can assume you continue to lie.

Defund_Israel profil fotoğrafı
Defund_Israel1 ay önce

I notice there’s no one denying the contents of that article anymore. 🤔

Jasmine profil fotoğrafı
Jasmine1 ay önce

Candace is the source

Travis Smith profil fotoğrafı
Travis Smith1 ay önce

Daily Mail has not and will not issue that retraction and very well may sue or at least have grounds to sue those lying and claiming they lack journalistic integrity. It was TPUSA's hit piece that just didn't go to plan. I can't tell you how funny this all is🤣🤣

Becky T profil fotoğrafı
Becky T1 ay önce

I can’t with those Nancy Pelosi eyebrows. My goodness can’t people just accept aging. Joel Osteen and his Botox and this mess.

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

Are you unable to focus on what is being said? What a strange comment. But your photo is a cat so

Becky T profil fotoğrafı
Becky T1 ay önce

That’s an Australian Silky dog not a cat. He’s a lot more charming to look at than this old mother of 6 & grandmother of 20 who is aging naturally. But, good point. I should post my pic to show it’s ok to age naturally.

Susie Q profil fotoğrafı
Susie Q1 ay önce

If you were interested in the truth, there are a lot of unanswered questions and inexplicable behavior from your friend, Erika. Start there and maybe you’d be taken seriously.

Rachel profil fotoğrafı
Rachel1 ay önce

@rand0m_m0m People have to start holding her accountable for the claims she makes so recklessly.

Tracey Tracey profil fotoğrafı
Tracey Tracey1 ay önce

Why is her face so deformed?

Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸1 ay önce

Let’s see yours

Tracey Tracey profil fotoğrafı
Tracey Tracey1 ay önce

You never answered my question.

C A R V E G I R L profil fotoğrafı
C A R V E G I R L1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT She's bloated with so much Botox and filler she looks like a desperate trout gasping for air

Tracey Tracey profil fotoğrafı
Tracey Tracey1 ay önce

@SarcasticLiberT So true

Jody Hoisington profil fotoğrafı
Jody Hoisington1 ay önce

Candace was probably the source of the article.

Adyl Rogers profil fotoğrafı
Adyl Rogers1 ay önce

You people are pathological liars. It was probably Erika herself that released the statement.

DungenCr4wler profil fotoğrafı
DungenCr4wler1 ay önce

Candace didn't say it was Tracey, go watch the whole episode.

Ladonna Marie profil fotoğrafı
Ladonna Marie1 ay önce

Wahhhhhh

Mandy profil fotoğrafı
Mandy1 ay önce

She said she suspected it was her. If it truly wasn't then why hasn't EK/TPUSA requested an apology and retraction??

Cine profil fotoğrafı
Cine1 ay önce

She stated that it was “her best guess…” she didn’t state it as fact. Comprehension isn’t your strong suit is it.

randi rivers profil fotoğrafı
randi rivers1 ay önce

Have not seen a statement or retraction by these Daily Mail on this issue…. Anyone else?

X profil fotoğrafı
X1 ay önce

She never said you were. She said she suspects it could’ve been you. Stop grifting off Candace, she made you all famous🤣

CatskillCutie profil fotoğrafı
CatskillCutie1 ay önce

I call BULLSHIT! She’s a liar and a shill!

TreadLightly5151 profil fotoğrafı
TreadLightly51511 ay önce

Lol this bitch thinks she has an ounce of credibility. Bahahahaha!

Pamela Ireland profil fotoğrafı
Pamela Ireland1 ay önce

This misinformation has to stop. Candace has caused so much chaos, destruction and heartache. She’s like the Soap Opera Queen of misinformation media!!! It’s DISGUSTING and she should be STOPPED!!! Yes!! I said that!!!!

andrew carson profil fotoğrafı
andrew carson1 ay önce

@KimStell1 Yes keep exposing that demonic jezebel witch

Benzer Videolar

Yesterday, TPUSA dropped a bombshell: according to the organization, Candace Owens threatened to “burn down” TPUSA. That disclosure allows me to finally discuss something I was working on MONTHS AGO-something I deliberately refused to publish because, despite having an extremely credible source, I could not independently corroborate it. And that distinction matters. I don't publish an allegation simply because it fits a narrative I like. I could not publish, despite that I believe this, I could not get any corroboration. If I published 1/10 of what I get, I would be breaking new ridiculous stories every single day, like other grifters on this app. But my stories hold because I make sure they hold, I do the work. I want to be clear, I am not presenting this story as fact, but after the bombshell released yesterday, I think people are entitled to know some of the things I have learned about Candace Owens. Months ago, one source I consider exceptionally reliable told me that Candace Owens wanted to return to TPUSA --potentially as CEO or in another senior position that would give her substantial influence or control within the organization. I took the allegation seriously enough to investigate it. I sent the attached message to several people who had contacts or sources inside TPUSA, asking them to corroborate what I had been told. I cannot emphasize enough the credibility of the source. However, I could not get any corroboration, so I did not and could not publish, that is not how I work. That's what you're supposed to do when you actually give a damn about getting a story right. My source was not anonymous, and the source would have been in a position to know what the source claimed. But yesterday's revelation changes the evidentiary landscape. It does NOT independently prove every detail my source gave me. I'm not going to pretend it does. But it provides enough independent context that the information I received months ago deserves to be disclosed and scrutinized. And here's the rest of what my source alleged: I was told that Candace wanted back into TPUSA leadership and that when it became apparent Erika Kirk was NOT going to bring her back-and instead intended to distance herself and the organization from Owens-the relationship deteriorated dramatically. Look at the timeline. In the beginning, Candace was publicly supportive of Erika and TPUSA. She accepted that Tyler Robinson was the killer. There wasn't some sprawling conspiracy involving TPUSA. There wasn't a campaign portraying the organization and people surrounding Charlie as suspicious characters in their own friend's murder. Candace even said Erica gave on of the most consequential speeches in American History. Then something changed. According to my source, the rejection came first. The war came afterward. My source's allegation was that once Owens realized there would be no triumphant return to TPUSA and no position of influence waiting for her, she turned against the organization. Now TPUSA itself alleges that Owens threatened to “burn down” the organization. That does not automatically prove my source's entire account. But it sure as hell makes the information I was given months ago considerably more relevant. And there is another important piece of evidence here: my contemporaneous messages. I didn't manufacture this source story yesterday after TPUSA made its allegation. I was privately attempting to corroborate it MONTHS AGO. The messages exist. They establish that this information was in my possession long before yesterday's disclosure. This is why I am releasing them now. People can examine the timeline and evidence and draw their own conclusions. But here's the difference between investigation and grifting: I had a story that would have generated enormous attention months ago, and I SAT ON IT because I couldn't corroborate it. I didn't turn one source into three. I didn't turn suspicion into evidence. I didn't turn an allegation into a fact. I kept digging. Now an organization directly involved in this dispute has publicly made an allegation that materially overlaps with the behavior my source described months ago. That doesn't close the case. It means the story I refused to publish is now a story worth examining. And on top of the other stories I am working on, I intend on pursuing this, HARDER.

MR. Xclusive

14,560 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨SHOCKING: The Macrons Just INVOKED Charlie Kirk's Name In Their Amended Complaint For Their LAWSUIT Against CANDACE OWENS. 😤 NissCee Social on YT just did a deep dive into the massive 250-page amended complaint filed by Brigitte Macron, and the new strategy is nothing short of shocking. THE CHARLIE KIRK AMENDMENT: On September 26, 2025, the Macrons amended their lawsuit to officially invoke Charlie Kirk’s name. They claim that Candace Owens is investigating Brigitte's identity "to distract from investigating Charlie Kirk's murder." The Gaslighting is Real. Candace Owens has said repeatedly that the attacks on her are the distraction to stop her from solving the murder. Now, the First Lady of France is using a dead man's name in a legal filing to paint Candace as "crazy." BUT HERE IS WHERE THEIR EVIDENCE FALLS APART: "BORN A WOMAN" ... BUT NOT FEMALE? The lawsuit uses the phrase "Born a Woman" 23 times. Problem: Babies aren't born women; they are born females. In France, you can legally change your sex on documents. The only way to prove biological sex is with an original birth certificate. Did they include one? NO. Instead, they included a newspaper clipping that proves a Brigitte was born, not that the First Lady is that person. THE DAILY MAIL FAIL: The lawsuit cites a Daily Mail article as the "Holy Grail" proof that the "Boy in the Checkered Shirt" is Brigitte's brother. The Contradiction: The Article: Identifies the boy as Jean-Claude (Brigitte’s late brother). Brigitte’s Previous Claim: Has always said the boy is Jean-Michel (who is alive). So which is it? The dead brother or the living brother? They are tripping over their own lies. THE MISSING HUSBAND: The lawsuit claims journalists met with Brigitte's ex-husband, Andre Louis Auziere. Spoiler: The current version of the article doesn't say that anywhere. In fact, Andre wasn't seen publicly from 1996 until he died in 2019. If the truth is on their side, why are they hiding the birth certificate and relying on conflicting articles? Go SUBSCRIBE to her YT Channel and watch the FULL Video breaking down the lawsuit linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

82,361 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

I am putting this on the record tonight. I believe my life is in danger. I am receiving death threats online, on X, on Facebook, and locally here in East Texas. This is happening because I keep telling the truth. You may not like how I say it. You may not like how direct I am. You may not like the way I present things. But I have not lied to people. I have told the truth, even when it was ugly, even when it made people uncomfortable, even when it cost me. And now, because I am telling the truth, people are attacking me, threatening me, lying about me, and trying to put me back in a cell. It appears my bond may have been revoked tonight simply because I spoke on social media, defended myself, and responded to public lies being told about me. Let me be clear: A gun was never pulled. Not drawn. Not pointed. Not brandished. That story is false. And now the only thing I have left is the truth. So I am releasing the evidence. The video. The timeline. The motions. The documents. The receipts. The public statements. The record. Full disclosure starts tonight. I am not asking anyone to threaten anyone. I am not asking anyone to harass anyone. I am not asking anyone to contact anyone. I am asking people to watch, read, save, share, and understand what is happening. Because if they throw me back in jail and suppress the evidence, then the false story wins. I cannot allow that. Truth is my defense. Truth is my protection. Truth is my only saving grace right now. Everything I have is coming out. Tonight. 👉

Ryan Nichols Sr.

15,801 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce